SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue3Effectiveness and tolerability of three types of colonoscopy preparation productsMicrosatellite instability in Colombian patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología

Print version ISSN 0120-9957On-line version ISSN 2500-7440

Rev. colomb. Gastroenterol. vol.36 no.3 Bogotá July/Sept. 2021  Epub Dec 16, 2021

https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.682 

Original articles

Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pancreatitis treated in a tertiary referral hospital in Cali

1Gastroenterologist. Fundación Valle del Lili. Cali, Colombia

2Internal medicine resident. Universidad Icesi. Cali, Colombia.

3Statistician, Valle del Lili Foundation. Cali, Colombia


Abstract

Introduction:

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a disease with a high degree of clinical complexity, and depending on its severity, it can have high morbidity and mortality rates, resulting in substantial health-care costs, particularly at the hospital level.

Materials and methods:

A descriptive study was developed based on the medical records of a tertiary referral university hospital. The records that included an ICD 10 diagnosis of acute pancreatitis between January 2011 and December 2018 were reviewed. All patients over the age of 18, of both sexes, with an AP diagnosis who met at least two of the 2012 Atlanta criteria were included in the study.

Results:

1 353 records were reviewed, of which 386 met the criteria for AP. There were 205 women (53%) and 181 males (47%) among them, and comorbidities were found in less than 10% of the participants. 38% of cases of pancreatitis occurred in people between 50 and 70 years of age. Regarding the etiology of AP, biliary origin was the most frequent with 200 cases (52%), followed by idiopathic (19.7%) and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 33 patients (8.5%).

Conclusions:

AP is a common condition that affects adults of all ages and results in a high number of emergency room visits. Previous data in Colombia was only available for individuals with severe pancreatitis, and nothing was known about the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in the emergency room.

Keywords: Pancreatitis; Acute; Characteristics of the population

Resumen

Introducción:

la pancreatitis aguda (PA) es una enfermedad de alta complejidad clínica y, de acuerdo con su gravedad, puede tener una elevada morbimortalidad con altos costos para el sistema de salud, especialmente a nivel intrahospitalario.

Materiales y métodos:

se desarrolló un estudio descriptivo basado en historias clínicas de un hospital universitario de alta complejidad. Se revisaron las historias con diagnóstico CIE 10 de pancreatitis aguda entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2018. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes mayores de 18 años, de ambos sexos, con diagnóstico de PA por cumplimiento de al menos 2 de los criterios de Atlanta de 2012.

Resultados:

se revisaron 1353 historias clínicas, de las cuales 386 cumplieron criterios para PA. Entre ellas se identificaron 205 mujeres (53 %) y 181 hombres (47 %), y la prevalencia de comorbilidades fue inferior al 10 %. El 38 % de los casos de pancreatitis ocurrieron en personas entre los 50 y 70 años de edad. Con respecto a la etiología de la PA, el origen biliar fue el de mayor frecuencia, con 200 casos del total (52 %); seguido de idiopático (19,7 %) y poscolangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE), que ocurrió en 33 pacientes (8,5 %).

Conclusiones:

la PA es una entidad frecuente que afecta a adultos de todas las edades y genera una cantidad importante de consultas en urgencias. En Colombia, los datos previos apuntaban a pacientes con pancreatitis graves y no se tenía conocimiento del comportamiento sociodemográfico y clínico de las pancreatitis agudas en urgencias.

Palabras clave: Pancreatitis; aguda; características de la población

Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory process that involves the pancreas, secondary to self-digestion by the enzymes it secretes (1. It should be suspected in a patient with upper, acute and severe abdominal pain; and for its diagnosis biochemical or radiological evidence is required (1-4.

It is a disease with a high degree of clinical complexity, and depending on its severity, it can have high morbidity and mortality rates, resulting in substantial health-care costs, particularly at the hospital level (6,7.

In Colombia, there are few studies that characterize patients with AP. The present work sought to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with AP in a fourth-level institution between 2011 and 2018.

Materials and methods

A retrospective descriptive study was developed, based on medical records from a highly complex university hospital. After obtaining the approval of the institutional ethics committee, the records with ICD 10 diagnosis of acute pancreatitis between January 2011 and December 2018 were reviewed (ICD 10 K85X, K868, K871). All patients over the age of 18, of both sexes, with an AP diagnosis who met at least two of the 2012 Atlanta criteria were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, clinical presentation, pancreatic enzyme levels, diagnostic imaging, management and complications were described.

A descriptive statistical analysis was performed; continuous variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), due to their distribution. Categorical variables are presented in proportions. For data analysis, the statistical softwareStata 14.0 was used.

Results

1353 records were reviewed, of which 386 met the criteria for AP. There were 205 women (53%) and 181 men (47%) among them, and comorbidities were found in less than 10% of the participants. 38% of cases of pancreatitis occurred in people between 50 and 70 years old. Table 1 shows the proportions of the other age groups.

Table 1 Sociodemographic Data and Clinical Presentation 

Variable n (total: 386) %
Sex
Male 181 46,9
Female 205 53,1
Age (years)
< 30 55 14,3
30-49 107 27,7
50-69 148 38,3
> 70 76 19,7
History
Dyslipidemia 30 7,8
Alcoholism 21 5,4
Cigarette consumption 21 5,4
Recurrent pancreatitis 13 3,4
Clinical presentation
Abdominal pain 376 97,4
Emesis 282 73,1
SIRS* 138 35,8
Severe acute pancreatitis 98 25,7
Jaundice 75 19,4
Shock 58 15,0
Symptom time** (hours) 20 (4-48) -

*SIRS: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome. It is defined as the presence of more than two of the following: temperature > 38 °C or < 36 °C, heart rate (HR) > 90 beats per minute (bpm), respiratory rate (RR) > 20 breaths per minute (bpm), leukocytes > 10 000, < 4000 or bandemia greater than 10 %. **Median (IQR).

Regarding the initial clinical manifestation, it was found that 97.4% of patients presented abdominal pain and 73% emesis, which are the two most frequent symptoms; the frequency of other symptoms is described in Table 1. In 98 patients (25.7%) who consulted the emergency room, severe AP was diagnosed. Pancreatic enzymes were found to be elevated in most cases: amylase and lipase were measured at 36% and 84%, respectively. The median amylase was 874 (laboratory limit value = 100) and 1293 for lipase (laboratory limit value = 60). The duration of symptoms prior to admission to the emergency room was on average 20 hours (8-48 hours).

Regarding the etiology of AP, biliary origin was the most frequent with 200 cases (52%), followed by idiopathic (19,7%) and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 33 patients (8.5%) and toxic in 22 cases (5,7 %) (Table 2). Other less frequent causes are mentioned in (Table 3).

Table 2 Toxic 

Medicine n %
Natural 5 22,8
Azathioprine 5 22,8
Pembrolizumab 1 4,5
5-ASA 1 4,5
Clozapine 1 4,5
Docetaxel 1 4,5
Glucantime® 1 4,5
Sulfonamides 1 4,5
Acyclovir 1 4,5
AINE 1 4,5
Antiretrovirals 1 4,5
Corticosteroids 1 4,5
Estrogens 1 4,5
Valproic acid 1 4,5

5-ASA: 5 aminosalicylic acid; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

As part of the diagnosis, biliary ultrasound was performed on all patients, 131 (30.1%)were subsequently taken to abdominal computed axial tomography (CT scan) and 137 to cholangioresonance (35.5%). The pancreatitis finding in these studies was 22.8%, 80.2% and 64.8%, respectively. The Balthazar classification was used in all patients with CT scan and 47 patients were classified as A (35.9%), 27 patients as B (20.6%), 28 patients as C (21.4%), 18 patients as D (13.7%) and 11 patients as E (8.4%). Of the patients evaluated, 42 (10%) had pancreatic necrosis, of which 23 (54.8%) had necrosis in less than 30% of the pancreas, 11 (26.2%) between 30% and 50% and 8 (19%) in more than 50%.

Table 3 Aetiology 

Cause n (total: 386) %
Biliary 200 51,8
Idiopathic 76 19,7
Post-ERCP 33 8,5
Toxic 22 5,7
Alcoholic 13 3,4
Posttraumatic 12 3,1
Recurrent 10 2,6
Dyslipidemic 9 2,3
Postsurgical 6 1,6
Autoimmune 5 1,3

Regarding management, 372 patients were hospitalized on the general floor (96.4%) with a median hospital stay of 4 (2-7) days. 230 patients required intensive care unit (ICU; 59.6%) with a median ICU stay of 4 (2-9) days. In relation to the initiation of the via oral, it was on average 2 (1-3) days after admission in 81.5% of patients, enteral nutrition in 10.6% and parenteral nutrition in 4.1% of patients. Other interventions such as antibiotic treatment and procedures are described in Table 4.

Table 4 Management 

Management n (total: 386) %
Hospitalization
Floor 372 96,4 %
Days on the floor 4* 2-7**
ICU 230 59,6 %
Days in the ICU 4* 2-9**
Diet
Time without via oral 2* 1-3**
Oral 315 81,6 %
Enteral 41 10,6 %
Parenteral 16 4,1 %
Antibiotic
Antibiotic requirement 104 26,9 %
Indication
Pancreatic 27 26 %
Extra pancreatic 77 74 %
Procedures
ERCP 59 15,3 %
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 126 32,6 %
Cholecystectomy, laparotomy 13 3,4 %
Necrosectomy 19 5 %

*Median. **IQR.

A total of 323 patients (83.6%) had no complications, 42 (10.9%) had necrotizing pancreatitis; 9 pancreatic pseudocyst (2.3%); 8 (2.1%) pancreatic abscess, and 4 (1.0%) diabetes mellitus (DM). Overall mortality was 4.1% (17 patients) (Table 5).

Table 5 Complications 

Complications n (total: 386) %
Without complications 323 83,6
Necrotizing pancreatitis 42 10,9
Pancreatic pseudocyst 9 2,3
Pancreatic abscess 8 2,1
DM 4 1,0
Death 17 4,4

Discussion

This study included 386 patients who met the criteria for the diagnosis of AP over an 8-year period, following a review of more than 1300 medical records who had an ICD-10 diagnosis of AP. This means that, even with clinical pictures suggestive of this pathology, there are limited cases that do meet the criteria. The proportion of patients by sex distribution was similar to that of international (8-10 and local (11,12 studies, with a slight predominance of the female sex, a situation that may be related to biliary etiology as the most frequent cause of AP, which is usually slightly more frequent in women (8,9). The prevalence was higher in patients between 50 and 70 years old, which is consistent with the study by Yatay et al., in which the most prevalent age was the sixth decade of life (9). There is a low percentage of comorbidities that can be explained by the variables chosen for the study, which are those that are associated as precipitating events of AP, and it can be observed that only a small fraction of patients with these predisposing factors developed the disease.

Abdominal pain characteristic of epigastric predominance and band irradiation was the most frequent symptom, present in almost all patients (97.4%), a percentage similar to that reported in the literature, in which it is reported that this is the cardinal symptom that leads patients to consult the emergency service (1). About three out of four patients had emetic episodes and one in five of those consulted had jaundice; this frequency of symptoms is similar to what was reported (1).

In relation to pancreatic enzymes, on the one hand, serum amylase presents an earlier elevation and helps guide the diagnosis for AP, but also presents a rapid return to normality, so that the diagnosis of AP can be lost in patients who show up more than 24 hours after the onset of symptoms. On the other hand, serum lipase, despite presenting a later elevation, remains elevated longer, since it reaches its peak at 24 hours and lasts up to14 days (3. Associated with this, in our study we see that on average patients enter the emergency room within 20 hours of the onset of symptoms and cases are found up to 48 hours later, this could indicate the highest percentage of serum lipase performed (84%), compared to serum amylase (36%). Both have good specificity and sensitivity (1. Patients who were included in the study met criteria for elevating pancreatic enzymes. In addition, amylase or lipase can be used in the institutional protocol, according to institutional guidelines, they are usually administered in the first 24-48 hours.

Regarding the etiology of AP, biliary origin remains the main cause with more than half of the cases reported, a finding that is consistent with multiple previous reviews around the world (8,13), and slightly lower than that reported by Diaz et al. in 201211). However, in contrast to other previous studies, the second most frequent cause in our population was not alcohol, which only represented 3.4% of cases; considerably less than in international studies (8,13 in which it represents around 20%. Our findings are consistent with what was reported by Diaz et al. 11), a situation that suggests the possibility of lower alcohol consumption at the national level or local mutations of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), alcohol-dehydrogenase (ADH) and cytochrome P450 CYP2E1, which make people less likely to develop the disease; a consideration that will have to be studied in the future 8,14-19.

The third cause of AP in this study was post-ERCP, the definition used was elevation of amylases 3 times to the normal value, 24 hours after the procedure. This etiology represented about 8% of cases; a very high incidence when compared to studies in other countries (8,13,20,21 and almost double of what was reported by Dias et al. (11), a finding that may be related to the complexity of the cases treated in the institution, a referral center in southwestern Colombia 22. In line with this, we found that severe AP after ERCP was uncommon compared to the other etiologies (3%); however, in our study this incidence is high compared to what was reported in the literature (0.5%) (8).

Hypertriglyceridemia was an uncommon cause of AP in our study, representing only 2.3% of cases with an average triglyceride of 600 mg/dL, substantially lower than that reported by studies such as Papachristou et al.23, in which it represents up to 10% of cases, and almost half of what was reported by Diaz et al. (11 locally. Although in more than 80% of cases a plausible etiology of AP was distinguished, in some patients (especially in those in whom idiopathic cause was determined) a lipid profile was not available.

Other causes of pancreatitis were toxicity, with a value lower than that reported in other series (5.7%) (8,24,25 and trauma, in 3% of cases, lower than previously described at the national level (11).

Regarding the relationship between the value of pancreatic enzymes and the severity of the disease, it was not possible to establish a relationship compatible with the findings of reviews found in the literature. In the 73 patients who had lipases below 600 IU/mL, mortality was 5.7%; whereas, in those with higher values, mortality was 3.3%26).

Almost 60% of patients required ICU management in the first 48 hours, double of what was reported in other series (8,11), possibly related to the typical population characteristics of a remission center, as mentioned above, where a higher level of complexity tends to be frequent. Severe AP was defined according to the Atlanta criteria, the medical criteria and in the APACHE II.

26.9% of patients received antibiotics; of these, 74% were due to extrapancreatic infections (27-30); antibiotic prophylaxis was not used, which is consistent with the management proposed in the guidelines (11.

30% of the patients were taken to cholecystectomy, taking into account that the most frequent etiology was of biliary origin and the procedure was performed during the same hospitalization. While only 5% of patients were taken to necrosectomy. Compared to other national series, a lower need for procedures was found, which could be related to an inclusion of fewer severe cases and a timely management (31-37).

Unlike other series, 83.6% of the patients did not present complications. The most frequent complication was pancreatic necrosis (10.9%), followed by pancreatic pseudocyst (2.3%) and pancreatic abscess (2.1%); beyond all this, the mortality observed in the study was lower than that reported in other series with a value of 4.4%38-40 and the mortality referred to in the clinical history was related to pancreatitis. The 17 medical records of the deceased patients were reviewed, in which the cause of death was analyzed and 95% died from infectious complications. When the relationship between complications and severity of pancreatitis is reviewed, mild pancreatitis was only complicated in 3% of cases, while severe pancreatitis had complication rates up to 37%41-45). The scope of this study did not consider the description of the management of complications, which we will take into account for an additional study, given that in our institution we perform transgastric necrosectomies and drains with transgastric pseudocyst prostheses.

Conclusions

AP is a common condition that affects adults of all ages and results in a high number of emergency room visits. In Colombia, previous data was only about individuals with severe pancreatitis, and nothing was known about the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in the emergency room. This study provides clinical information of interest on a large population of patients treated in a referral center. The demographic behavior of the population studied is similar to that reported in the rest of the world, with similar affection in sexes and age groups. It is noteworthy that the biliary cause is the main etiology of AP and in most cases, its extensive study allowed to clarify other etiologies. Management in general is consistent with most guidelines suggesting avoiding the use of prophylactic antibiotics and deferring early feeding. More local studies are required to clarify the behavior of complications and long-term mortality in our environment.

References

1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779Links ]

2. Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology; Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut. 2005;54 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.057026Links ]

3. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(9):1400-15; 1416. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.218Links ]

4. Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, De Maertelaere V, Bali M, Winant C, Coppens E, Jeanmart J, Zalcman M, Van Gansbeke D, Devière J, Matos C. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(3):715-23. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.006Links ]

5. Di MY, Liu H, Yang ZY, Bonis PA, Tang JL, Lau J. Prediction Models of Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis in Adults: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(7):482-490. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0650Links ]

6. Pandol SJ, Saluja AK, Imrie CW, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis: bench to the bedside. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(3):1127-51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.01.055Links ]

7. Fagenholz PJ, Castillo CF, Harris NS, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA Jr. Increasing United States hospital admissions for acute pancreatitis, 1988-2003. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(7):491-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.02.002Links ]

8. Weiss FU, Laemmerhirt F, Lerch MM. Etiology and Risk Factors of Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis. Visc Med. 2019;35(2):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499138Links ]

9. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas. 2006;33(4):323-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mpa.0000236733.31617.52Links ]

10. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(6):1252-61. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068Links ]

11. Diaz C, Garzón S, Morales CH, Montoya M. Pancreatitis aguda grave: curso clínico, manejo y factores asociados con mortalidad. Rev Colomb Cir. 2012;27(4):281-9. [ Links ]

12. Puerto LH, Medina R, Nuñez LR, Conrado Jimenez H, Olaya JG, San Juan JF, Puerto Horta SA, Martínez Montalvo CM, Medina Cabrera MM. Manejo y desenlaces de la pancreatitis aguda en un hospital de cuarto nivel (Huila, Colombia), 3 años de experiencia. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2019; 34(1): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.243Links ]

13. Bustamante Durón D, García Laínez A, Umanzor García W, Leiva Rubio L, Barrientos Rosales A, Diek Romero L. Pancreatitis aguda: evidencia actual. Archivos de Medicina. 2018;14(1:4):1-10. [ Links ]

14. Bertin C, Pelletier AL, Vullierme MP, Bienvenu T, Rebours V, Hentic O, Maire F, Hammel P, Vilgrain V, Ruszniewski P, Lévy P. Pancreas divisum is not a cause of pancreatitis by itself but acts as a partner of genetic mutations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(2):311-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.424Links ]

15. DiMagno MJ, Dimagno EP. Pancreas divisum does not cause pancreatitis, but associates with CFTR mutations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(2):318-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.430Links ]

16. Whitcomb DC, LaRusch J, Krasinskas AM, Klei L, Smith JP, Brand RE, Neoptolemos JP, Lerch MM, Tector M, Sandhu BS, Guda NM, Orlichenko L; Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium, Alkaade S, Amann ST, Anderson MA, Baillie J, Banks PA, Conwell D, Coté GA, Cotton PB, DiSario J, Farrer LA, Forsmark CE, Johnstone M, Gardner TB, Gelrud A, Greenhalf W, Haines JL, Hartman DJ, Hawes RA, Lawrence C, Lewis M, Mayerle J, Mayeux R, Melhem NM, Money ME, Muniraj T, Papachristou GI, Pericak-Vance MA, Romagnuolo J, Schellenberg GD, Sherman S, Simon P, Singh VP, Slivka A, Stolz D, Sutton R, Weiss FU, Wilcox CM, Zarnescu NO, Wisniewski SR, O’Connell MR, Kienholz ML, Roeder K, Barmada MM, Yadav D, Devlin B. Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis. Nat Genet. 2012;44(12):1349-54. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2466Links ]

17. Apte MV, Pirola RC, Wilson JS. Mechanisms of alcoholic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25(12):1816-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06445.xLinks ]

18. Phillip V, Huber W, Hagemes F, Lorenz S, Matheis U, Preinfalk S, Schuster T, Lippl F, Saugel B, Schmid RM. Incidence of acute pancreatitis does not increase during Oktoberfest, but is higher than previously described in Germany. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(11):995-1000.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.06.016Links ]

19. Whitcomb DC. Genetic risk factors for pancreatic disorders. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(6):1292-302. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.069Links ]

20. Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Deviere J, Mariani A, Rigaux J, Baron TH, Testoni PA; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2010;42(6):503-15. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244208Links ]

21. Aktas H, Mensink PB, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Low incidence of hyperamylasemia after proximal double-balloon enteroscopy: has the insertion technique improved? Endoscopy. 2009;41(8):670-3. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214976Links ]

22. Ding X, Zhang F, Wang Y. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2015;13(4):218-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2014.11.005Links ]

23. PapachristouGI, Machicado JD, Stevens T, Goenka MK, Ferreira M, Gutierrez SC, Singh VK, Kamal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JA, Pelaez-Luna M, Gulla A, ZarnescuNO , Triantafyllou K, Barbu ST, Easler J, Ocampo C, Capurso G, Archibugi L, Cote GA, Lambiase L, Kochhar R, Chua T, Tiwari SC, Nawaz H, Park WG, de-Madaria E, Lee PJ, Wu BU, Greer PJ, Dugum M, Koutroumpakis E, Akshintala V, Gougol A. Acute pancreatitis patient registry to examine novel therapies in clinical experience (APPRENTICE): an international, multicenter consortium for the study of acute pancreatitis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(1):106-113. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0109Links ]

24. Nitsche C, Maertin S, Scheiber J, Ritter CA, Lerch MM, Mayerle J . Drug-induced pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14(2):131-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-012-0245-9Links ]

25. Bertilsson S, Kalaitzakis E. Acute Pancreatitis and Use of Pancreatitis-Associated Drugs: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study. Pancreas. 2015;44(7):1096-104. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000406Links ]

26. Hamer JF. Retrospective cohort study demonstrates that modified CT Severity Index directly correlates with lipase values at or above 600. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;56:169-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.023Links ]

27. Isenmann R, Rünzi M, Kron M, Kahl S, Kraus D, Jung N, Maier L, Malfertheiner P, Goebell H, Beger HG; German Antibiotics in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(4):997-1004. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.050Links ]

28. Dellinger EP, Tellado JM, Soto NE, Ashley SW, Barie PS, Dugernier T, Imrie CW, Johnson CD, Knaebel HP, Laterre PF, Maravi-Poma E, Kissler JJ, Sanchez-Garcia M, Utzolino S. Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):674-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000250414.09255.84Links ]

29. Lim CL, Lee W, Liew YX, Tang SS, Chlebicki MP, Kwa AL. Role of antibiotic prophylaxis in necrotizing pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(3):480-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2662-6Links ]

30. Villatoro E, Mulla M, Larvin M. Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(5):CD002941. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002941.pub3Links ]

31. Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD010326. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010326.pub2Links ]

32. van Baal MC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, Schaapherder AF, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Gooszen HG, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5):860-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182507646Links ]

33. da Costa DW, Bouwense SA, Schepers NJ, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, Bakker OJ, Bollen TL, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Boermeester MA, Bruno MJ, van Eijck CH, Timmer R, Weusten BL, Consten EC, Brink MA, Spanier BWM, Bilgen EJS, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Hofker HS, Rosman C, Voorburg AM, Bosscha K, van Duijvendijk P, Gerritsen JJ, Heisterkamp J, de Hingh IH, Witteman BJ, Kruyt PM, Scheepers JJ, Molenaar IQ, Schaapherder AF, Manusama ER, van der Waaij LA, van Unen J, Dijkgraaf MG, van Ramshorst B, Gooszen HG, Boerma D; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1261-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00274-3Links ]

34. Freeman ML, Werner J, van Santvoort HC, Baron TH, Besselink MG, Windsor JA, Horvath KD, vanSonnenberg E, Bollen TL, Vege SS; International Multidisciplinary Panel of Speakers and Moderators. Interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: summary of a multidisciplinary consensus conference. Pancreas. 2012;41(8):1176-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e318269c660Links ]

35. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck CH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Timmer R, Laméris JS, Kruyt PM, Manusama ER, van der Harst E, van der Schelling GP, Karsten T, Hesselink EJ, van Laarhoven CJ, Rosman C, Bosscha K, de Wit RJ, Houdijk AP, van Leeuwen MS, Buskens E, Gooszen HG; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(16):1491-502. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908821Links ]

36. Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, Geskus RB, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, van Eijck CH, Fockens P, Hazebroek EJ, Nijmeijer RM, Poley JW, van Ramshorst B, Vleggaar FP, Boermeester MA, Gooszen HG, Weusten BL, Timmer R; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(10):1053-61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.276Links ]

37. Mouli VP, Sreenivas V, Garg PK. Efficacy of conservative treatment, without necrosectomy, for infected pancreatic necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(2):333-340.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.004Links ]

38. Wu D, Xu Y, Zeng Y, Wang X. Endocrine pancreatic function changes after acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2011;40(7):1006-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e31821fde3fLinks ]

39. Pezzilli R, Simoni P, Casadei R, Morselli-Labate AM. Exocrine pancreatic function during the early recovery phase of acute pancreatitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2009;8(3):316-9. [ Links ]

40. Symersky T, van Hoorn B, Masclee AA. The outcome of a long-term follow-up of pancreatic function after recovery from acute pancreatitis. JOP. 2006;7(5):447-53. [ Links ]

41. Doepel M, Eriksson J, Halme L, Kumpulainen T, Höckerstedt K. Good long-term results in patients surviving severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80(12):1583-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800801229Links ]

42. Lankisch PG, Breuer N, Bruns A, Weber-Dany B, Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Natural history of acute pancreatitis: a long-term population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(11):2797-805; quiz 2806. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.405Links ]

43. Nøjgaard C, Becker U, Matzen P, Andersen JR, Holst C, Bendtsen F. Progression from acute to chronic pancreatitis: prognostic factors, mortality, and natural course. Pancreas. 2011;40(8):1195-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e318221f569Links ]

44. Yadav D , O’Connell M, Papachristou GI . Natural history following the first attack of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(7):1096-103. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.126Links ]

45. Seidensticker F, Otto J, Lankisch PG. Recovery of the pancreas after acute pancreatitis is not necessarily complete. Int J Pancreatol. 1995;17(3):225-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02785818Links ]

Citation:

Rojas C, Salazar N, Sepúlveda M, Maldonado C, Castro A, Gómez Y, Jurado E, Rojas N. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pancreatitis treated in a tertiary referral hospital in Cali. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2021;36(3):341-348. https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.682

Received: October 14, 2020; Accepted: March 01, 2021

*Correspondence: Carlos Rojas. crojo16@yahoo.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License