SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número2Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to identify arcelins from Phaseolus vulgaris with inmuno-proteomic analysis índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Agronomía Colombiana

versão impressa ISSN 0120-9965

Agron. colomb. vol.36 no.2 Bogotá maio/ago. 2018

https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v36n2.69634 

Fitomejoramiento, recursos geneticos y biología molecular

Characterization and selection of Citrus sinensis Osbeck cv. Margaritera parental trees for repopulation in the Mompox depression region, Colombia

Caracterización y selección de árboles madre de naranja cv. Margaritera, Citrus sinensis Osbeck, para repoblamiento en la depresión momposina, Colombia

Marlon Yacomelo1 

Cesar Baquero2 

Mauricio Martínez3 

Nubia Murcia4 

Ender Correa5 

Javier Orlando Orduz-Rodriguez6  * 

1 Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA. Centro de Investigación Caribia, Km 6 vía Sevilla-Guacamayal, Zona Bananera del Magdalena (Colombia).

2 Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA. Centro de Investigación Caribia, Km 6 vía Sevilla-Guacamayal, Zona Bananera del Magdalena (Colombia).

3 Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA. Centro de Investigación Palmira. Diagonal a la intersección de la Carrera 36a con calle 23, Palmira (Colombia).

4 Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA. Centro de Investigación Palmira. Diagonal a la intersección de la Carrera 36a con calle 23, Palmira (Colombia).

5 Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA. Centro de Investigación Caribia, Km 6 vía Sevilla-Guacamayal, Zona Bananera del Magdalena (Colombia).

6 Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA. Centro de Investigación la Libertad. Km 17 vía Puerto López, Meta (Colombia).


ABSTRACT

At the Mompox depression region, located in the lower valley of the Magdalena River, citrus trees and especially the orange cultivar Margaritera (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) are cultivated by small producers. The effects of the rainy season during 2010 and 2011 caused the loss of ca. 80% of the planted area in some municipalities. The main objective of this study was to select outstanding genotypes according to fruit quality attributes based on the Colombian Technical Standard NTC4086. This selection was carried out by collecting and characterizing 120 Margaritera orange genotypes represented by three clones: Margarita, Azúcar and Criollo. The characterization was performed using 14 fruit descriptors regulated by the parameters of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Outstanding clones were chosen using a selection index based on attributes such as juice percentage and maturity index. The fruit characterization showed variability for all the descriptors evaluated, especially those related to size, weight and acidity (explained 51.76% of the total variability). Furthermore, these contributed mostly to comprise three phenotypic groups conformed by 79, 23 and 18 genotypes, respectively. Eight outstanding genotypes were selected for quality attributes: four Margarita clones, two Azúcar clones and two Criollo clones; these became a source of guaranteed propagation material in the region.

Key words: Margarita clone; Azucar clone; Criollo clone; selection index; quality attributes

RESUMEN

En la depresión momposina-valle bajo del Río Magdalena, Colombia, los cítricos y especialmente el cultivar de naranja Margaritera (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) son cultivados por pequeños productores. La ola invernal en 2010-2011 ocasionó la pérdida aproximada del 80% del área sembrada en algunos municipios. El objetivo de esta investigación fue seleccionar genotipos sobresalientes según atributos de calidad de fruta con base en la Norma Técnica Colombiana NTC4086. Para ello se colectaron y caracterizaron 120 genotipos de naranja Margaritera representados por tres clones: Margarita, Azúcar y Criollo. En la caracterización se utilizaron 14 descriptores de fruto siguiendo los parámetros del Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos. Los clones sobresalientes se escogieron mediante un índice de selección basado en atributos de porcentaje de jugo e índice de madurez. La caracterización del fruto mostró variabilidad en los descriptores evaluados, especialmente los relacionados con tamaño, peso y acidez (explicaron el 51,76% de la variabilidad total). Igualmente, contribuyeron a la conformación de tres grupos fenotípicos de 79, 23 y 18 genotipos, respectivamente. Se seleccionaron ocho genotipos sobresalientes según atributos de calidad: cuatro del clon Margarita, dos del Azúcar y dos del Criollo; estos se convierten en una fuente de material de propagación garantizado en la región.

Palabras clave: clon Margarita; clon Criollo; clon Azúcar; índice de selección; atributos de calidad

Introduction

Citrus plants are native to the tropical and subtropical regions of Asia and the Malay Archipelago, and their commercial production is concentrated between 20° and 40° latitude in both hemispheres (Roose et al., 2015) incorporating an uncertain number of species (Albert et al., 2018). According to FAO, citrus plants are the main fruit crop cultivated worldwide reaching an approximate production of 139,796,997 metric t and a planted area of 9,080,780 ha in 2014 (FAO, 2004; FAOSTAT, 2014). During this same year in Colombia, the area planted with citrics was 97,275 ha with a production of 1,206,856 t per year, being orange the main cultivated citrus species with 54,711 ha of cultivated area that produced 669,187 t (ASOHOFRUCOL, 2016; ENA-DANE, 2016). Orange cultivation relies on the use of different clones such as Valencia and Sweety, and in smaller areas clones such as Salustina, Hamlin and various selections of Criollo materials are used (Orduz and Mateus, 2012; Ramírez et al, 2014).

Among the Criollo materials the Margaritera orange stands out; it is grafted on bitter orange (Citrus aurantium L.) tree rootstock. Margaritera orange has been bred according to the necessities of the region's producers, finding three clones: Margarita, Azúcar and Criollo. These bred lines differ in their acidity concentrations and total soluble solids, being the Azúcar clones the ones that showed the lowest acidity and the highest total soluble solids. These clones are adapted to the edaphoclimatic conditions of the Mompox depression region and its surroundings, where average monthly temperatures exceed 25°C all year round, daily minimum temperatures are rarely less than 20°C, and the maximums frequently exceed 32°C. The average bimodal annual rainfall (first peak in May and a second peak in October) decreases from 2,200 mm in the south and southeast, and in Cauca and Magdalena rivers to less than 1,000 mm where Loba and Mompox converge (García, 2001). Margaritera orange is cultivated mainly by small-scale producers in the municipalities of Santa Cruz de Mompox, San Fernando and Margarita in the province of Bolívar, and in Guamal, Santa Ana, San Zenón and San Sebastián in the south of the province of Magdalena; this orange has outstanding attributes of35.22% juice and good taste, making it attractive for domestic and export markets; however, despite the high acceptance of these clones by producers, basic aspects of their phenotypic variability are still unknown.

During the last winter season in 2010-2011, ca. 80% of the orange trees in some municipalities of the Mompox region were affected or destroyed by floods (Huertas et al., 2014; Agronet, 2017).This situation placed the genetic resource of the region at risk. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize and select high value Margaritera orange clones, with the purpose of providing propagation material for nurseries, so basic gardens can be established. Once these gardens are established, they can be used as a basis for repopulation in the region as they are part of the producers' subsistence economic strategy. Furthermore, the constant supply of plant breeding can increase the fruit consumption in the cities of the Caribbean coast.

Materials and methods

Phenotypic characterization of fruits from the selected genotypes

A recognition track was established in the Mompox depression in the municipalities of San Fernando, Margarita and Santa Cruz de Mompox in the province of Bolívar, and in the municipalities of Guamal and San Sebastián in the province of Magdalena, assessing the citrus fruits productive areas and identifying the crops lines that survived the harsh rainy season occurred in 2011. After analyzing the location data, a focused sampling was carried out, considering Margaritera orange trees as the bred line with higher productivity, better fruit quality, more vigorous and longer-life cycle. Twenty-five farms were visited selecting 120 tree genotypes (Fig. 1), and from these, five fruits of the middle third of the tree crown (one for each cardinal point and a randomly selected one) were chosen per tree. During collection, the fruits were selected following the quality criteria registered in the Icontec NTC4086 regulation (Icontec, 1997). Under these statements, whole fruits with specific features of the Valencia orange were selected. Such traits included: presence of the calyx, healthy tissues, and whole fruits without any symptoms of abnormal external humidity caused by poor postharvest management. The fruits should not have any external and strange smell and/or taste (stemming from other products, packages or recipients and/or agrochemicals that might have been in contact with the fruits). Fresh fruits should also have a firm consistency and be free of any visible strange materials (such as dirt, dust, agrochemicals and foreign objects). Each genotype was codified according to the producer's criteria as follows: a Margarita (Mar) clone, an Azúcar (Azuc) clone or a Criollo (Crio) clone. The fruits were then analyzed in the laboratory using 14 quantitative descriptors for Citrus spp. published by IPGRI (2000). For the information analysis, a completely randomized design with 120 treatments and five replicates was used, in which treatments corresponded to the trees sampled and the replicates corresponded to the fruits per tree.

FIGURE 1 Sampled municipalities and geographic location of the genotypes characterized. 

Selection of outstanding clones

A selection index (SI) with standardized variables (mean = 0 and variance = 1) that included variables such as juice percentage (JP) and maturity index (MI) was established; this last one is a variable obtained from the relation between total soluble solids (TSS) and titratable acidity (TA); these are the main attributes considered when orange is commercialized in the agro-industrial markets. According to the Colombian Technical Standards Institute (Icontec) regulation (NTC4086), for the commercialization of Valencia orange (maturity stage I), the desired TSS concentration is 8.2 °Brix, TA of 1.5% citric acid, MI of 5.5 and a JP higher than 40%. Therefore, and after fulfilling the required attributes, the SI (described in equation 1) was established. According to the SI, 7% of the genotypes that comprise the groups obtained in the phenotypic characterization were selected in order to maintain the best clones with the highest variability.

Equation 1:

Where:

SI: standardized selection index

JP: juice percentage (%)

MI: maturity index

Statistical analysis

Data obtained in the morpho-agronomic characterization were analyzed using the statistical program SAS® Enterprise Guide® version 5.1 (2012). A descriptive analysis (mean, standard deviation, standard error, coefficient of variation, minimum and maximum values) was carried out to establish the variability of the quantitative characteristics at the level of the selected and characterized trees; an ANOVA and Tukey test of multiple comparisons were also applied with the evaluated variables. A principal component analysis (PCA) was further carried out to establish the descriptors with the highest contribution to total variability. Next, the 120 genotypes were grouped with a cluster analysis obtaining relatively homogeneous groups (Franco and Hidalgo, 2003).

Results and discusion

Phenotypic characterization

The descriptive statistics such as averages, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and minimum and maximum values of the 120 genotypes of Margaritera orange collected are shown in Table 1. In general, the quantitative morphological characteristics showed a low coefficient of variation (CV<26%), except for the titratable acidity descriptors (CV = 40.32%), number of seeds per fruit (CV = 39.49%), resistance to penetration (CV = 34.72%) and fruit peel weight (CV = 34.17%); these are important when discriminating the variability of Margaritera orange genotypes. Moreover, the descriptors that showed lower coefficient of variation were fruit diameter length with 8.09% and 9.55% respectively. The characteristics that showed the highest dispersion values compared to their sampling means were: fruit weight that showed a minimum value of 94.10 g and a maximum value of 472.50 g; fruit peel weight with a minimum value of 23.30 g and 157.90 g as its maximum value; and fruit content with a minimum value of 37 g and a maximum value of 151 g. These values agreed with the ones reported by Duran and Luz (2013), who found fruit weights between 64.6 and 365 g in Valencia oranges cultivated in Chimicha-gua, department of Cesar.

TABLE 1 Descriptive statistics for 14 quantitative variables of 120 genotypes of the orange Margaritera cultivar (Citrus spp.) collected in the Mompox depression. 

SD: standard deviation; VAR: variance; CV: coefficient of variation.

Correlation analysis

The correlation matrix indicates associations that are statistically significant (P≤0.05) and highly significant (P≤0.01). The most outstanding correlations were fruit weight (FW) compared to: fruit length (FW vs. FL = 0.92**), fruit diameter (FW vs. FD = 0.87**), fruit peel weight (FW vs. FPW = 0.81**) and juice content (FW vs. JC = 0.76**). Meanwhile, the fruit peel weight reported an important correlation (FPW) with peel thickness (FPW vs. PT = 0.81**), fruit length (FWP vs. FL = 0.77**) and fruit diameter (FPW vs. FD = 0.74**). Equally important was the correlation between fruit diameter and fruit length (FD vs. FL = 0.88**), and fruit diameter with juice content (FD vs. JC = 0.67**). Finally, the correlation between fruit length with juice content (FL vs. JC = 0.70**), and titratable acidity with pH (TA vs. pH = -0.7**) were representative as well (Tab. 2).

TABLE 2 Pearson's correlation results for 14 quantitative fruit characteristics in Margaritera orange (Citrus spp.). 

** Highly significant (P≤0.01); * significant (P≤0.05); ns: not significant (P>0.05); bold values indicate highly significant correlations (≤-0.6 and >0.6).

High correlations between the FW with fruit dimensions (FL and FD) and filling (FPW and JC) were expected. To support this statement, higher fruit dimensions, filling rates, and higher weight, were assessed as the physiological response of the accumulation of metabolites in the fruit development. This effect may be limited whether by the inability of the fruit to accumulate metabolites or by the lack of them within the plant (Agustí and Almela, 1991). Likewise, Bain (1958) characterized the general development pattern of the Valencia orange fruits in the subtropical conditions of Australia, as a simple sigmoidal curve from anthesis to maturation. The same trend was also described by several authors such as Pérez de Camacaro and Jiménez (2009) for the same species in a vegetable garden in the State of Portuguesa in Venezuela, Garzón et al. (2013) in the foothills of Llanos Orientales in Colombia, and Orduz et al. (2009) in Arrayana mandarin in foothill conditions in Meta.

Furthermore, the titratable acidity and pH showed a negative correlation; when higher juice pH was found, a lower titratable acidity was also found. These variables are related, as the titratable acidity measures the total acid concentrations which are mostly organic acids such as citric, malic, lactic and tartaric acids that influence flavor, color and juice stability. Moreover, pH quantifies H3O+ concentration which can be considered as active acidity. In this regard, this value is of great importance for food industries, because it determines the use and control of microorganisms and enzymes driving processes, such as the clarification and stabilization of fruit and vegetable juices, as well as fermented byproducts. In Table 2, Pearson's correlation data for 14 quantitative fruit characteristics in Margaritera orange are presented.

Principal component analysis

PCA showed that 78.82% of the variability was explained by five main or principal components (PC) (Tab. 3). The first PC explains most of the variability with 38.41%, followed by the second 13.50%, the third PC 11.19%, the fourth 8.24% and the fifth PC 7.48%.

TABLE 3 Contribution of quantitative variables to the conformation of the first five main components (PC) of the Margaritera orange (Citrus spp.) collected at the Mompox depression. 

The descriptors with the greatest contribution to phenotypic variability in the first three principal components are mainly associated with fruit dimensions (fruit weight, diameter and length) and the chemical characteristics of the juice (titratable acidity, pH and total soluble solids); This results confirm what was stated by Goldenberg et al. (2018) and Agustí et al. (2003), in which the fruit size of a variety can vary between a wide margin and is regulated by a set of endogenous factors (genetic factors, fruit position, competition between different growing organs) and exogenous factors (environmental factors and cultural practices); Lado et al. (2018) and Reuther and Rios-Castaño (1969) described that juice acidity and total soluble solids are regulated by environmental conditions, mainly temperature. However, authors like Nii et al. (1970), Reuther (1973) and Yamanishi (1994) mention that the influence of temperature on total soluble solids (TSS) is not so clear; for example, in Valencia orange the highest TSS contents are obtained in fruits from subtropical areas, but the conclusion of many studies, combining thermal regimes, climates and crop zones in different fruit development states, is the lack of systematic response of the TSS content to the thermal variations.

Cluster analysis

Multivariate-cluster analysis generated three phenotypic groups (GI, GII and GIII) (Fig. 2). Group GI comprises 79 genotypes of which 93.6% belong to the Margarita clone and 6.4% belong to genotypes of the Criollo clone. Group GII is comprised by 23 genotypes of which 60.86% belong to the Margarita clone and 39.14% genotypes belong to the Criollo clone. Finally, group GIII comprises 18 genotypes, of which 80.33% are identified as Azúcar clones, 11.11% belong to genotypes of the Margarita clone, and one (1) genotype belongs to the Criollo clone (see Supplementary material 1).

Comparing characteristics of the groups comprised, significant differences were found (ANOVA≤0.05) with the exception of attributes: number of seeds per fruit and resistance to penetration. The GI genotypes are mainly characterized by having smaller fruits (FD = 70.92 mm and FL = 68.88 mm) and lower weight (183.73 g), lower MI (15.13) and higher JP (36.80%). On the other hand, the genotypes of the GII have larger fruits (FD = 79.59 mm and FL = 79.41 mm), lower weight (FW = 270.79 g) and lower JP (33.35%). Lastly, the GIII shows fruits with an intermediate size and weight compared to fruit characteristics found in GI and GII; this highlights the fact that the main attribute that identifies the genotypes of this group are the low titratable acidity of the juice and higher pH (TA = 0.21% citric acid and pH = 5.23), which is evidenced by the high maturity index (MI = 66.78) (Tab. 4).

TABLE 4 Descriptive analysis of fruit characteristics from the groups obtained in the phenotypic characterization.GI (79): group 1 with 79 genotypes; GII (23): group 2 with 23 genotypes; GIII (18): group 3 with 18 genotypes; CV: coefficient of variation. 

Means with distinct letters indicate significant difference after the Tukey test (P≤0.05).

The results corroborate, to a great extent, the appreciations mentioned by producers, confirming the existence of three clones selected by organoleptic characteristics, also emphasizing that these attributes are maintained when asexual propagation is carried out. Quality attributes reported for the Margaritera orange cultivar are characteristic of Valencia orange cultivated in the tropical zone below 300 m a.s.l.; with these conditions fruits develop a green color when ripe, with high concentrations of soluble solids and low acidity (González, 2014). These features differentiate it from the attributes of the Valencia orange cultivated in the subtropical zone and make it difficult to export to markets in developed countries because these characteristics do not meet the optimum requirements for agro-industrial processing (Aguilar, 2012). However, Valencia orange and especially the Margaritera have an assured market niche for fresh consumption, since there is great local demand with greater marketing opportunities and better prices than those offered by the agroindustry (MADR, 2005). Additionally, in Colombia a large part of the citric demands are met with imports from other countries, and oranges represent the highest percentage with 50.6% as orange juice and 17% as fresh fruit (Aguilar, 2012).

It is important to indicate that quality attributes demanded by fruit processing industries are difficult to meet for the Margaritera orange, considering that citrus fruits are native from subtropical zones and in those latitudes annual growth and development cycles of citrics are regulated by climatic seasons (winter, spring, summer and autumn).

FIGURE 2 Dendrogram analysis of the cluster classification of 120 Margaritera orange genotypes collected at the Mompox depression. Data were obtained from PCA. 

According to Orduz et al. (2010), seasonal changes related to rainy and dry seasons increase the environment average temperature and light radiation rates; a further decrease in these environmental ranges affects several physical properties such as growth, phenology (Guadalupe et al., 2018) and development behavior, and some quality characteristics, including the juice color range, sugar content and the acidic ratio (that establishes if it is pleasant for the palate) (Vélez et al., 2012).

Armadans et al. (2014) and Hernández et al. (2014) stated that citric quality is influenced, in addition, by numerous factors such as soil, fertilization, cultural practices, phytos-anitary treatments and the graft-holder, which suggests that fruit quality can be improved under tropical conditions.

Selection of outstanding clones based on the Colombian technical standard NTC4086

According to the NTC4086 parameters, GI genotypes were classified as fruits caliber D (FD between 62-71 mm) and GII and GIII genotypes were classified as fruits caliber C (DF between 72-83 mm). Fruit quality ranges were assigned according to Orduz et al. (2011), who reported that first quality oranges are those fruits above 230 g. GI and GII genotypes (183.73 g and 217.38 g, respectively) were classified as small fruits, while genotype GIII (270.79 g) was considered as first quality line. All three groups show JP<40%, TSS>8.2 °Brix, TA<1.5% citric acid, and MI>5.5. Despite the fruit quality is not appropriate to many international industrial markets due to the low juice acidity, the non-fulfillment of many requirements demanded in the NTC4086 is not an impediment for the fruit commercialization in the region.

Taking into account the afore-mentioned, we used the selection index proposed in equation 1 to select within each group the genotypes that are closest to comply with the requirements registered in NTC4086. As a result, approximately 7% of the genotypes of each group were selected among the genotypes that show the highest SI. The selected genotypes were: group I (Mar015, Mar037, Mar063 and Mar070), group II (Cr126 and Cr132) and group III (Az108 and Az122).

Moreover, the selected genotypes from group I belong to the traditional clone known as orange Margarita; these clones are characterized by showing small fruits (Caliber D) with a juice percentage higher than 40%, TSS>8.2 °Brix and TA>0.80% citric acid. The two genotypes selected from group II belong to the Criollo clones produced by seed, and are characterized by showing larger fruits (Caliber C) and higher weights, with a JP higher than 39%, TSS>8.2 °Brix and TA>0.64% of citric acid. Finally, the genotypes selected from group III belong to the clone Azúcar range farther from the requirements demanded in the NTC4086. However, it is a highly demanded clone by local producers and general consumers for fresh consumption and is characterized mainly by its high sugar concentration (TSS>9 °Brix) and low titratable acidity (TA<0.2% citric acid) (Tab. 5). The selected genotypes from groups I and II are those suggested to be offered to nurseries of the region as these show features that comply with the attributes reported in the NTC4086. Furthermore, the selected genotypes from group III are suggested to be considered for special fruit orders that require high TSS concentrations and low TA. It is important to note that the suggested genotypes still show a MI higher than the reported in the NTC4086. However, considering that Margaritera orange is mainly produced to supply fresh consumption markets, and following the statements by Sartori et al. (2002), the desired MI for this fruit ranges between 8.8 and 15.4, highlighting the fact that the MI reached by the genotypes of the GI and GII corresponds mainly to fruits in a maturation state 4-5 (MI = 9.8-11.8).

TABLE 5 Characteristics of the selected genotypes with the highest IS. 

In addition to the genotypes selected for quality attributes, the Marg032 genotype was identified as seedless, making it an alternative for improvement processes, considering the great interest of some markets to acquire seedless fruits.

It is important to indicate that the genotypes characterized in the research, except for the Criollo genotypes that are produced by seed, are all grafted onto a bitter orange (Citrus aurantium L.) rootstock, which is a condition for the genotypes to show the features identified in the characterization. In this regard, the rootstock influences more than 20 horticultural characteristics of the grafted variety such as yield, longevity, nutrient adsorption, size, shape, color, internal and external fruit quality, tolerance to diseases, and adaptation to soil and climate conditions (Davies and Albrigo, 1994). Moreover, it might contribute more than any other factor to the success or failure of the citrus industry in any region of the world (Wutscher and Bistline, 1988). In addition, studies carried out by Chaparro-Zambrano et al. (2015) on the behavior of Valencia orange grafted in different rootstocks in the low tropics of Colombia showed as a result that the Sunky x English pattern contributed to a high maturity index ratio (TSS/ TA = 15.82ab) compared to rootstocks C-35 (13.74ab), Carrizo (IM = 14.39ab), Swingle (IM = 14.83ab), Citrumelo or CPB4475 (IM = 13.2ab), Cleopatra (IM = 13.19b), Volka-merian (IM = 11.44b), Webberi (IM = 12.51b) and Yuma (IM = 12.85b). Additionally, in the year 2017 the same authors found statistically significant differences between TSS and MI in juice of Arrayana tangerine grafted onto six rootstocks (Carrizo, Citrumelo Swingle, Cleopatra, Sunky x English, Sunky x Jacobson and Volcameriana). Other studies carried out in Mexico established that among a group of 20 rootstocks, Flying Dragon, Mandarina Cleopatra, Sacaton, Yuma, Morton, Rubidoux and Troyer confer the same quality to the fruit of Valencia orange than the one achieved with the bitter orange tree (Uribe-Bustamante et al., 2013). Simultaneously, Parameshwar et al. (2018) report that Rough Lemon (C. limon Linn. Burn) rootstocks have an effect on tree growth and the quality of fruit in Valencia Late orange. Rootstock effects on lemon fruit production and quality were assessed by Legua et al. (2018) reporting that the rootstock Forner-Alcaide 2324, Forner-Alcaide 418 and Forner-Alcaide 5 influenced fruit quality in lemon cultivars ('Fino 49' F49, 'Verna 50' V50 and 'Fino Elche' FE). In contrast, Da Silva et al. (2018) reported that the quality of navel orange "caracara" was not influenced by any of the evaluated rootstocks (Rangpur lime, 'Florida' rough lemon, 'Volkamer' lemon, 'BRS Tropical Sunki' mandarin, 'Indio' citrandarin, 'Vangasay' rough lemon). The above mentioned allows us to consider the possibility of multiplying the selected clones and grafting them on other rootstocks that can improve the internal and external fruit quality.

Conclusions

Significant differences were found between morphological and fruit quality characteristics of the Margaritera orange. One-hundred and twenty genotypes of Margaritera oranges were selected at the Mompox depression, 92 belonging to the Margarita clone, 15 to the Azúcar clone and 13 to the Criollo clone. The genotypes were morphologically characterized and grouped based on 14 quantitative characteristics, forming three different phenotype sets, grouped with a dissimilarity value of 10. Five main components were established, which explain 78.82% of the variability of the cultivars, being the first component the one that explains the greatest percentage of variability with 38.41%.

Among three Margaritera orange clones studied, eight outstanding genotypes were selected, which became the main source of propagation material for nurseries in the region when carrying out Margarita orange multiplication processes, thus, guaranteeing the origin of the material produced.

The three selected clones become an alternative for nurseries in the region to start the establishment of basic orchards for propagation material, in accordance with resolution ICA 0004215 of 2014.

It is necessary to evaluate the behavior of the selected Margaritera orange clones with other rootstocks, which confer better productivity characteristics, fruit quality and tolerance to excess moisture.

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out by the Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-Corpoica, with funds received from the TV16 transfer within the framework of Law 1731 of 2014.

The authors express their gratitude to all the producers who allowed the entrance of researchers from Corpoica to their farms for the selection and morphological characterization of Margarita orange trees, and especially to the producers Juan Perez and Hermide Perez for their support in the collections of plant material.

Literature cited

Agronet. 2017. Evaluaciones Agropecuarias Municipales 2013. Grupo de estadística e información sectorial-Oficina de Planeación y Prospectiva-Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Bogotá, Colombia. [ Links ]

Aguilar, P., M. Escobar, and C. Pássaro. 2012. Situación actual de la cadena de cítricos en Colombia: limitantes y perspectivas: cultivo, poscosecha e industrialización. Serie Lasallista Investigación y Ciencia. Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, Caldas, Colombia. [ Links ]

Agustí, M. and V. Almela. 1991. Aplicación de fitorreguladores en citricultura. Ed. Aedos, Barcelona, España. [ Links ]

Agustí, M ., A. Martínez-Fuentes, C. Mesejo, M. Juan, and V. Almela . 2003. Cuajado de desarrollo de los frutos cítricos. Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Edita Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, España. [ Links ]

Albert G., J. Terol., V. Ibanez., A. López-García., E. Pérez-Román., C. Borredá., C. Domingo, F.R. Tadeo., J. Carbonell-Caballero., R. Alonso., F. Curk., D. Du., P. Ollitrault, M.L. Roose., J. Dopazo, F.G. Gmitter., D.S. Rokhsar, and M. Talon. 2018. Genomics of the origin and evolution of Citrus. Nature 554, 311-316. Doi: 10.1038/nature25447. [ Links ]

Armadans A., N. Villalba, and H. Rodríguez. 2014. Influencia del porta-injertos y la época de cosecha sobre la calidad de pomelo (Citrus paradisis Macfad) variedad Rio Red. Acta Agron. 63 (2), 122-127. Doi: 10.15446/acag.v63n2.37905. [ Links ]

ASOHOFRUCOL. 2016. Proyecciones. Unidad Técnica de ASO-HOFRUCOL, con base en cifras de MADR (2015). [Projections. Technical Unit of ASOHOFRUCOL, based on figures from MADR (2015)]. ASOHOFRUCOL, Colombia. [ Links ]

Bain, J.M. 1958. Morphological, anatomical and physiological changes in the developing fruit of the Valencia orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). Aust. J. Bot. 6, 1-24. Doi: 10.1071/BT9580001. [ Links ]

Chaparro-Zambrano, H., H. Velásquez, and J.O. Ordúz. 2015. Performance of 'Valencia' sweet orange grafted in different rootstocks, Colombia Tropical Lowland 2001-2013. Agron. Colomb. 33(1), 43-48. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.49497. [ Links ]

Da Silva, M., E. Girardi., N. De Oliveira., A. Da Silva., W. Soares., and O. Sampaio. 2018. Initial performance of alternative citrus scion and rootstock combinations on the northern coast of the state of Bahia, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Frutic. Doi: 10.1590/0100-29452018480. [ Links ]

Davies, F.S. and L.G. Albrigo. 1994. Citrus. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K. [ Links ]

Duran, R. and A. Villa. 2013. Evolución de los parámetros de naranja Valencia producida en el municipio de Chimichagua, Cesar-Colombia. Rev. Temas Agrar. 18 (1), 66-74. Doi: 10.21897/rta.v18i1.711. [ Links ]

ENA-DANE. 2016. Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria [National Agricultural Survey]. ENA-DANE, Colombia. [ Links ]

FAO. 2004. Citrus fresh and processing. Annual statistics. FAO, Rome. [ Links ]

FAOSTAT. 2014. Producción mundial de cítricos año 2014. URL: URL: http://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QC (accessed 24 August 2017). [ Links ]

Franco, T.L. and R. Hidalgo (eds.). 2003. Análisis estadístico de datos de caracterización morfológica de recursos Fitogenéticos. Boletín número 8, Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos (IPGRI), Cali, Colombia. [ Links ]

García, L. 2001. Región de Mompox: síntesis de estudios de evaluación ambiental regional para el sector transporte. Subdirección del Medio Ambiente y Gestión Social-Instituto Nacional de Vías de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia. [ Links ]

Garzón, D.L., J.E. Velez-Sanchez, and J.O. Orduz-Rodriguez. 2013. Efecto del déficit hídrico en el crecimiento y desarrollo de frutos de naranja Valencia (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) en el piedemonte del Meta, Colombia. Acta Agron. 62(2), 136-147. [ Links ]

Goldenberg, L., Y. Yaniv, R. Porat, and N. Carmi. 2018. Mandarin fruit quality: a review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 98, 18-26. Doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8495. [ Links ]

González, C. 2014. Identificación de materiales de naranja para la agroindustria de jugos y concentrados de exportación, adaptados a las condiciones agroecológicas de la zona cafetera central. Undegraduate thesis. Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, Bogotá, Colombia. [ Links ]

Guadalupe, N., D.C. Castro, M. Buyatti, P. Gabriel, and N. Gariglio. 2018. Factors affecting phenology of different Citrus varieties under the temperate climate conditions of Santa Fe, Argentina. Rev. Bras. Frutic. Jaboticabal 40(1), (e-315). Doi: 10.1590/0100-29452018315. [ Links ]

Hernández, D., D. Mateus, and J.O. Orduz. 2014. Características climáticas y balance hídrico de la lima ácida Tahití (Citrus latifolia Tanaka) en cinco localidades productoras de Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 8(2), 217-229. Doi: 10.17584/rcch.2014v8i2.3215. [ Links ]

Huertas, N., F. Panesso, and L. Garces, 2014. Adaptación al cambio climático en el municipio de Margarita, Bolívar. Revista Economía y Región 8(1), 207-242. [ Links ]

ICONTEC. 1997. Norma técnica colombiana NTC4086. Frutas frescas, naranja Valencia especificaciones. Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación (ICONTEC), Bogotá. [ Links ]

IPGRI. 2000. Descriptores para los cítricos. Citrus spp. Instituto Internacional de Recursos Fitogenéticos, Rome. [ Links ]

Lado J., G. Gambetta., and L. Zacarías. 2018. Key determinants of citrus fruit quality: Metabolites and main changes during maturation. Sci. Hortic. (233), 238-248. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.055. [ Links ]

Legua L., M.R. Martinez-Cuenca, R. Bellver, and M.A. Forner-Giner. 2018. Rootstock's and scion's impact on lemon quality in southeast Spain. Int. Agrophys. (32) 325-333. Doi: 10.1515/intag-2017-0018. [ Links ]

Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR). 2005. Observatorio agrocadenas de Colombia. Documento de trabajo No. 107. La cadena de cítricos en Colombia: Una mirada global de su estructura y dinámica 1991-2005. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Bogotá, Colombia. [ Links ]

Nii, N., K. Harada, and K. Kadowaki. 1970. Effects of temperature on the fruit growth and quality of Satsuma oranges. J. Jap. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 39, 309-317. Doi: 10.2503/jjshs.39.309. [ Links ]

Orduz, J.O., S. Castiblanco, C. Calderón, and H. Velásquez . 2011. Potencial de rendimiento y calidad de 13 variedades e híbridos comerciales de cítricos en condiciones del piedemonte llanero de Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortíc. 5(2), 171-185. Doi: 10.17584/rcch.2011v5i2.1273. [ Links ]

Orduz, J. and D. Mateus . 2012. Generalidades de los cítricos y recomendaciones agronómicas para su cultivo en Colombia. pp. 49-88. In: Garcés G., L.F. (ed.). Cítricos: cultivo, poscosecha e industrialización. Caldas: Corporación Universitaria Lasallista. Serie Lasallista Investigación y Ciencia. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR), Corporación Universitaria Lasallista; Universidad de Antioquia, Itagui, Colombia. [ Links ]

Orduz, J ., H. Monrroy, and G. Fischer. 2010. Comportamiento fenológico de la mandarina 'Arrayana' en el piedemonte del Meta, Colombia. Agron. Colomb . 28(1), 63-70. [ Links ]

Orduz J., H. Monroy, G. Fischer , and A. Herrera. 2009. Crecimiento y desarrollo del fruto de mandarina (Citrus reticulata) Ar-rayana' en condiciones del piedemonte del Meta, Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic . 31(2), 149-160. Doi: 10.17584/rcch.2009v3i2.1208. [ Links ]

Parameshwar P., P.S. Joshi, and Nagre, P.K. 2018. Effect of rootstock on plant growth and fruit quality of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis var. Valencia Late). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(4), 1685-1689. Doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.190. [ Links ]

Pérez de Camacaro, M. and A. Jiménez. 2009. Crecimiento y abscisión del fruto de naranja 'valencia' (Citrus sinensis L. Os-beck) en un huerto del estado Portuguesa, Venezuela. Bioagro 21(2), 133-138. [ Links ]

Ramírez R.J., M.P.J, Ordóñez, T.E. Narváez, G.S.C. Pinzón, M. Martínez, R.N. Murcia, and E.S.M. Salazar. 2014. Principales características y tendencias del mercado de cítricos en Colombia. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Corpoica). [ Links ]

Reuther, W. 1973. Climate and citrus behavior. pp. 280-337. In: Reuther, W. (ed.). The citrus industry (2nd ed.). University of California, Berkeley, USA. [ Links ]

Reuther, W. and D. Rios-Castaño. 1969. Comparison of growth, maturation and composition of citrus fruits in subtropical California and tropical Colombia. Proc. 1st Int. Citrus Symp. 1, 277-300. Riverside, California, USA. [ Links ]

Roose, M.L., F.G. Gmitter , R.F. Lee, and K.E. Hummer. 2015. Conservation of citrus germplasm: an international survey. Acta Hortic. 1101, 33-38. Doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1101.6. [ Links ]

Sartori, I., O. Koller, S. Schwarz, R. Bender, and G. Schafer. 2002. Maturação de frutos de seis cultivares de Laranjas-Doces na depressão central do Rio Grande do Sul. Rev. Bras. Frutic . 24, 364-369. Doi: 10.1590/S0100-29452002000200018. [ Links ]

Uribe-Bustamante, A., S. Curti-Díaz, C. Hernández-Guerra, and S.J. Ticante-Montero. 2013. Calidad de naranja 'Valencia' injertada en 20 portainjertos. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 19(1), 61-69. Doi: 10.5154/r.rchsh.2011.08.043. [ Links ]

Vélez, J., J. Álvarez-Herrera, and O. Alvarado-Sanabria. 2012. El estrés hídrico en cítricos (Citrus spp.): Una revisión. Orinoquia 16(2), 32-39. [ Links ]

Wutscher, H.K. and F.W. Bistline. 1988. Performance of "Hamlin" orange on 30 citrus rootstocks in Southern Florida. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 113, 493-497. [ Links ]

Yamanishi, O.K. 1994. Effect of spring day/night temperatures on flower development. Fruit set and fruit quality on strangulated pummelo trees. J. Jap. Soc. Hortic. Sci . 63(3), 493-504. Doi: 10.2503/jjshs.63.493. [ Links ]

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 1.

List of genotypes (codes) belonging to each phenotypic group.

Received: December 31, 2017; Accepted: July 24, 2018

* Corresponding author: jorduz@agrosavia.co

Licencia Creative Commons:

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License