SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 issue1Glyphosate and atrazine inhibit growth of Azospirillum brasilense, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus thuringiensis, Chromobacterium subtsugae and Saccharopolyspora spinosaPropagation of macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia Maiden & Betche) by cuttings author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Agronomía Colombiana

Print version ISSN 0120-9965

Agron. colomb. vol.39 no.1 Bogotá Jan./Apr. 2021  Epub Sep 15, 2021

https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n1.89545 

Scientific note

Pre-sowing application of combinations of burndown and pre-emergent herbicides for Conyza spp. control in soybean

Aplicación en la pre-siembra de mezclas de herbicidas desecantes y pre-emergentes para el control de Conyza spp. en la soya

Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht1 

Leandro Paiola Albrecht1 

Samuel Neves Rodrigues Alves2 

André Felipe Moreira Silva3  * 

Weslei de Oliveira Silva1 

Juliano Bortoluzzi Lorenzetti4 

Maikon Tiago Yamada Danilussi4 

Arthur Arrobas Martins Barroso4 

1 Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Parana (Brazil).

2 FMC, Paulínia, São Paulo (Brazil).

3 Crop Science, Palotina, Parana (Brazil).

4 Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Parana (Brazil).


ABSTRACT

Together, Conyza bonariensis, C. canadensis and C. sumatrensis show 105 reported cases of biotypes resistant to herbicides like glyphosate, paraquat, and acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors . The application of pre-emergent herbicides combined with burndown herbicides is believed to be effective in controlling Conyza spp. during soybean pre-sowing management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sulfen-trazone/diuron, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and diclosulam in mixtures with diquat, paraquat, or glufosinate on the control of Conyza spp. Two field experiments were conducted in a randomized block design with four replicates. Treatments consisted of the application of pre-emergent plus burndown herbicides, besides the weedy control treatment (without application), for a total of 10 treatments. The control of Conyza spp. was evaluated at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d after herbicide application, and symptoms of injury in soybean plants were evaluated at 14, 21, 28, and 35 d after herbicide application. The herbicides sulfentrazone/diuron, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and diclosulam in combination with burndown herbicides diquat, paraquat, or glufosinate were effective in controlling Conyza spp. in the pre-sowing management of soybean, highlighting good options for pre- and post-emergent herbicide rotations. Mixtures with diclosulam showed a higher potential for injury to soybean plants than sulfentrazone/diuron and imazethapyr/flumioxazin.

Key words: diclosulam; flumioxazin; glufosinate; Glycine max; imazethapyr; sulfentrazone; weeds

RESUMEN

Juntas, Conyza bonariensis, C. canadensis y C. sumatrensis presentan 105 casos reportados de biotipos resistentes a herbicidas tales como glifosato, paraquat y los inhibidores de la acetolactato sintasa (ALS). Se cree que la aplicación de herbicidas pre-emergentes en mezclas con desecantes es efectiva para controlar Conyza spp. en el manejo pre-siembra de la soya. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia de sulfentrazona/ diuron, imazetapir/flumioxazin y diclosulam, en mezcla con diquat, paraquat o glufosinato, en el control de Conyza spp. Se realizaron dos experimentos de campo en diseño de bloques al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Los tratamientos consistieron en la aplicación de herbicidas pre-emergentes en mezclas con desecantes, además del tratamiento control (sin aplicación), para un total de 10 tratamientos. El control de Conyza spp. se evaluó a los 7, 14, 21, 28 y 35 d después de la aplicación del herbicida, y se evaluaron los síntomas de daño en las plantas de soya a los 14, 21, 28 y 35 d después de la aplicación del herbicida. Los herbicidas sulfentrazona/diuron, imazetapir/flumioxazin y diclosulam en mezclas con diquat, paraquat o glufosinato, fueron efectivos para controlar Conyza spp. en la pre-siembra de la soya, destacando buenas opciones para la rotación de herbicidas antes y después de la emergencia. Las mezclas con diclosulam mostraron un mayor potencial de daño a las plantas de soya que sulfentrazona/diuron y imazetapir/flumioxazin.

Palabras clave: diclosulam; flumioxazin; glufosinato; Glycine max; imazetapir; sulfentrazona; malezas

Introduction

Glyphosate has become the most widely used herbicide in grain crops with the adoption of glyphosate-tolerant crops, such as Roundup Ready® soybean. This intensive use leads to the selection of herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. There are currently 53 weed species with cases of glyphosate-resistant biotypes worldwide (Heap, 2021).

The weeds hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis), horseweed (C. canadensis), and Sumatran fleabane (C. sumatrensis) are among the main weeds found worldwide (Trainer et al., 2005). They are annual herbaceous plants with high seed production and are found in various agricultural environments, such as grain crops (Lorenzi, 2014). Altogether, they have 105 reported cases of biotypes that are resistant to herbicides, such as glyphosate, paraquat, and acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors (Heap, 2021). Recent studies showed that there are biotypes of C. sumatrensis with resistance to paraquat (Zobiole et al., 2019) or 2,4-D (Queiroz et al., 2020), and multiple resistance to glyphosate, chlorimuron, and paraquat (Albrecht, Pereira, et al., 2020).

Thus, it is necessary to use other herbicides, such as pre-emergent herbicides, and different modes of action that are effective in controlling hard-to-control weeds, whether herbicide-tolerant or resistant (Mueller et al., 2014). Studies highlight the efficacy of pre-emergent herbicides in controlling Conyza spp. in soybeans. These include flumioxazin (Zimmer et al., 2018), diclosulam (Braz et al., 2017), diuron (Moreira et al., 2010), sulfentrazone (Zimmer et al., 2018), and imazethapyr (Hedges et al., 2019).

In addition to the use of pre-emergent herbicides for the effective management of Conyza spp., burndown herbicides should be used in combination in situations with the presence of these weeds prior to soybean sowing. Among these herbicides, diquat (Weaver et al., 2004), paraquat, and glufosinate (Zobiole et al., 2018) stand out.

The application of pre-emergent herbicides combined with burndown herbicides is believed to be effective in controlling Conyza spp. in the pre-sowing management of soybean. Therefore, the present study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of pre-emergent herbicides sulfentrazone/diuron, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and diclosulam in combination with burndown herbicides diquat, paraquat, or glufosinate on the control of Conyza spp.

Materials and methods

Two field experiments were carried out in the city of Palotina, state of Parana, Brazil, at coordinates 24°20'44.54" S, 53°51'50.93" W (experiment 1) and 24°20'48.89" S, 53°51'37.58" W (experiment 2) during the 2018-19 growing season.

For both experiments, the soil was classified as clay texture, with 63% clay, 19% silt, and 15% sand. The climate of the region is temperate humid with hot summers (Cfa), according to the Köppen classification (Aparecido et al, 2016), and the weather conditions for the experimental period are illustrated in Figure 1. The area in experiment 1 was previously cultivated with maize and in experiment 2 with wheat. Both areas were infested with Conyza spp. plants up to 15 cm high and with 16 leaves. No flowering plants were observed at the time of application, and plant density was 17 and 20 Conyza plants m-2 in experiments 1 and 2, respectively.

FIGURE 1 Rainfall and minimum and maximum temperature for the experimental sites. 2018/19 season, Palotina, PR, Brazil. 

The treatments consisted of different herbicide applications in a randomized block design with four replicates (Tab. 1). Application of treatments occurred on October 15, 2018 with sowing of soybean cultivar Monsoy* 5947 IPRO (Monsanto Co. do Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) on the same day, immediately after application. Herbicides were applied using a C02 pressurized backpack sprayer (Pulverizador Pesquisa - Herbicat Ltda, Catanduva, SP, Brazil) equipped with six AIXR 110.015 nozzles at a pressure of 2.5 kgf m-2 and a speed of 3.6 km/h, providing an application volume of 150 L ha-1. For experiment 1, the climatic conditions during the application were as follow: temperature of 27.3°C, relative air humidity of 61.5%, and wind speed of 6.4 km/h. For experiment 2, the conditions were as follow: temperature of 29.5°C, relative air humidity of 60.2%, and wind speed of 7.0 km/h.

TABLE 1 Herbicide mixture treatments applied in pre-sowing of soybean to control Conyza spp. 2018/19 season, Palotina, PR, Brazil. 

*Rates at g of acid equivalent (ae) ha-1 for imazethapyr and at g of active ingredient (ae) ha-1 for the other herbicides. Addition of 0.5% mineral oil to all treatments.

The experimental units were composed of 3 x 5 m parcels; soybean sowing was carried out after the application of the treatments with 13 seeds m-1. Six soybean lines were sown in each parcel with a spacing of 0.45 m. The evaluations were carried out in the useful area of the parcel, discarding the external lines and the first and last meters.

The control of Conyza spp. plants was assessed at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d after herbicide application (DAA). Injury symptoms in soybean plants were assessed at 14, 21, 28 and 35 DAA. These assessments were carried out through visual analysis at each experimental unit considering significantly visible symptoms in the plants, according to their development. Scores from 0 to 100% were assigned, where 0 represented the absence of symptoms and 100% the death of the plant (Velini et al., 1995). The treatment without application (without herbicide effect) was used as a reference for evaluations, always with a score of 0, whether for weed control or injuries to soybean plants, as in other studies (Braz et al., 2017; Chahal & Jhala, 2019; Guerra et al., 2020).

Data were tested by analysis of variance and F-test (P<0.05) according to Pimentel-Gomes and Garcia (2002). The means of the treatments were compared by the Tukey test (P<0.05) using the Sisvar 5.6 program (Ferreira, 2011).

Results

In experiment 1, all herbicide treatments were effective in controlling Conyza spp., with values higher than or equal to 83.8% at 7 DAA for all treatments. No differences were detected between herbicide treatments, and all of them were superior to the weedy control treatment (without application) throughout all evaluations. It is worth noting the control for all combinations at 35 DAA with values of at least 94.3% (Tab. 2).

TABLE 2 Control (%) of Conyza spp. from 7 to 35 d after application of herbicide mixtures (DAA). 2018/19 season, Palotina, PR, Brazil (experiment 1). 

*Means followed by the same letter in the line do not differ from each other according to the Tukey test at the 5% probability level. CV - coefficient of variation.

As observed for experiment 1 (area previously cultivated with maize), in experiment 2 (area previously cultivated with wheat) herbicide treatments were effective in controlling Conyza spp. with no differences between combinations from 21 to 35 DAA. Some differences were observed between herbicide treatments at 7 and 14 DAA; however, all exhibited weed control of at least 89.0%. At 35 DAA, a control of Conyza spp. of at least 94.8% was observed for all herbicide treatments (Tab. 3).

TABLE 3 Control (%) of Conyza spp. from 7 to 35 d after application of herbicide mixtures (DAA). 2018/19 season, Palotina, PR, Brazil (experiment 2). 

*Means followed by the same letter in the line do not differ from each other according to the Tukey test at the 5% probability level. CV - coefficient of variation.

For experiment 1, at 14 DAA, no differences were detected between treatments regarding injury symptoms in soybean plants. Treatments with diclosulam caused stronger symptoms, up to 10.3% at 21 DAA; these were superior to almost all other treatments from 21 to 35 DAA. For the treatments composed of the application of sulfentrazone/diuron and imazethapyr/flumioxazin, injury symptoms were 3.8% to 4.3% and 2.3% to 2.5%, respectively at 35 DAA (Tab. 4).

TABLE 4 Crop injury (%) of soybean plants from 14 to 35 d after application of herbicide mixtures (DAA). 2018/19 season, Palotina, PR, Brazil (experiment 1). 

*Means followed by the same letter in the line do not differ from each other according to the Tukey test at the 5% probability level. ns - not significant, means do not differ from each other by the F-test at the 5% probability level. CV - coefficient of variation.

Table 5 shows the injury symptoms in soybean plants due to herbicide application for experiment 2. Differences between treatments were observed in all evaluations. Symptoms were up to 9% (at 28 DAA), while at the last assessment (35 DAA) they ranged from 2.0% to 6.8%, in general with greater potential for injury to the application of diclosulam.

TABLE 5 Crop injury (%) of soybean plants from 14 to 35 d after application of herbicide mixtures (DAA) during the 2018/19 season, Palotina, PR, Brazil (experiment 2). 

*Means followed by the same letter in the line do not differ from each other according to the Tukey test at the 5% probability level. CV - coefficient of variation.

Discussion

In this study, the pre-sowing application of sulfentrazone/ diuron (premix formulation) in combination with diquat, paraquat, or glufosinate was effective in controlling Conyza spp. Similar results were observed by Zimmer et al. (2018), where pre-sowing application of sulfentrazone (195 g ae ha-1) in a mixture with halauxifen (5 g ai ha-1) + glyphosate (1,120 g ae ha-1) + cloransulam (25 g ai ha-1) provided 94% control of C. canadensis at 35 d after application. Sulfentrazone was effective in different management programs to control Amaranthus tuberculatus (Schryver et al., 2017) and other weeds. Sulfentrazone has a variable half-life (34-116 d) according to soil moisture and temperature and is less persistent under conditions of higher humidity and higher temperature (40°C); these aspects interfere with its residual period (Brum et al., 2013). Additionally, sulfentrazone has a spectrum of action on eudicotyledonous weeds and some grasses (Rodrigues & Almeida, 2018). These studies, and the results of the present study, indicate the effectiveness of sulfentrazone in different mixtures on the control of weeds.

The application of diuron with mixtures was effective in controlling Conyza spp. in the present study. In other research, a control of 91% of C. bonariensis at 30 DAA was observed with the application of diuron (200 g ai ha-1) at mixtures (Paula et al., 2011). Other studies also highlight the effectiveness of diuron in controlling Conyza spp. in different combinations (Lamego et al., 2013; Santos et al., 2015). Diuron is an herbicide that is especially effective for the control of eudicotyledons and some grasses. In the present study, diuron was effective in controlling Conyza spp. in a premixture with sulfentrazone. The half-life can vary from 40 to 91 d and is generally more persistent in soils with higher levels of clay and organic matter (Rocha et al., 2013). This characteristic helps to explain the results of this study.

The pre-sowing application of imazethapyr/flumioxazin (premix formulation) was also effective for controlling Conyza spp. in this study. Similar results were observed by Albrecht, Albrecht, et al. (2020), who found that this premix formulation obtained a control of about 80% of Conyza spp. up to 35 DAA. Imazethapyr has a soil half-life varying from 36 to 98 d (Marinho et al., 2019), and flumioxazin from 13 to 18 d (Ferrell & Vencill, 2003), according to the edaphoclimatic conditions. The persistence of imazethapyr helps to explain the effectiveness of this mixture over time, especially in the emergence of plants.

Pre-sowing application of imazethapyr (100 g ae ha-1) in a mixture with glyphosate, dicamba, and saflufenacil provided 93% control of C. canadensis 12 weeks after application (Hedges et al., 2019). This herbicide, in mixture with saflufenacil, is also effective in controlling Abutilon theophrasti, Amaranthus retroflexus, and Chenopodium album (Underwood et al., 2017). Pre-sowing application of flumioxazin (76 g ai ha-1) in combination with halauxifen (5 g ai ha-1) + glyphosate (1,120 g ae ha-1) + cloransulam (25 g ai ha-1), following glyphosate application (1,120 g ae ha-1) in post-emergence soybean, provided 96% control of C. canadensis at 35 d after the first application (Zimmer et al., 2018). The results of the present study corroborated these findings, indicating the effectiveness of imazethapyr/ flumioxazin in different chemical control programs.

In the present study, diclosulam was also effective in controlling Conyza spp. in combination with diquat, paraquat, or glufosinate. In general, no significant differences were observed between the management adopted for the control of Conyza spp. in initial post-emergence (plants up to 15 cm high) and pre-emergence. This highlights the importance of rotation of mechanisms of action not only in post-emergence, but also in pre-emergence.

Diclosulam is one of the most widely used herbicides in soybean pre-sowing for controlling Conyza spp. and other weeds. Krenchinski et al. (2019) report control of up to 97.25% of Conyza spp. for diclosulam applied at pre-sowing in soybean, plus halauxifen + glyphosate. Other studies also report the control of Conyza spp. with the application of diclosulam in different combinations (Braz et al., 2017; Zobiole et al., 2018). This herbicide has a soil half-life varying from 16 to 87 d, according to the edaphoclimatic conditions (Lavorenti et al., 2003) and provides a broad-spectrum control (Rodrigues & Almeida, 2018).

The results of this study indicated that glufosinate may be an alternative in the management of Conyza spp. as a tool for preventing resistance to herbicides. In this sense, it is worth mentioning the recent cases of a C. sumatrensis biotype reported to be resistant to paraquat (Zobiole et al., 2019) or with multiple resistance to glyphosate, chlorimuron, and paraquat (Albrecht, Pereira, et al., 2020) in the state of Parana, Brazil. Paraquat is a photosystem I inhibitor herbicide with the same mechanism of action as that of diquat. These two herbicides are among the main desiccants for pre-sowing application in soybean.

Several studies also highlight the efficacy of glufosinate in controlling Conyza spp. (Oliveira Neto et al., 2010; Tahmasebi et al., 2018; Zobiole et al., 2018; Albrecht, Albrecht, et al., 2020). This herbicide is also effective in controlling other weeds, such as Amaranthus spp. (Hay et al., 2019), Spermacoce latifolia and Richardia brasiliensis (Gallon et al., 2019). Glufosinate can be used in pre-sowing, as in the present study, and in post-emergence of tolerant transgenic cultivars (soybean, maize, and cotton with pat or bar genes).

Regarding symptoms of injury, diclosulam showed higher phytotoxic potential, especially in experiment 1, with symptoms of up to 10.3%. For the other pre-emergent herbicides, minor injuries were observed in the soybean plants. Different studies also report injury symptoms in soybean with the application of diclosulam (Osipe et al., 2014; Braz et al., 2017). However, plants recover from the symptoms with no effect on the agronomic performance, and this proves the selectivity of the herbicide.

Belfry et al. (2016) found symptoms of 8% and 2% injury for pre-sowing application of flumioxazin and sulfentrazone, respectively. Belfry et al. (2015) also observed symptoms of 8% and 4% injury for pre-sowing application of flumioxazin and imazethapyr, respectively. Braswell et al. (2015) observed up to 15% soybean injury for pre-sowing application of diuron. For these herbicides, injury symptoms up to a maximum of 5% were observed in soybean plants at the end of the evaluations. These results confirm the potential selectivity of pre-emergent herbicides for soybeans.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this study we can conclude that it is important to rotate both post-emergent and pre-emergent herbicides since there have been several reports of resistance to glyphosate and ALS inhibitors that are widely used in pre-emergence. We would like to highlight the equivalence of the different herbicide combinations in the control of Conyza spp. in this study, after growing maize (experiment 1) or wheat (experiment 2).

The herbicides sulfentrazone/diuron, imazethapyr/flumioxazin, and diclosulam in mixtures with burndown herbicides (diquat, paraquat or glufosinate) were effective in controlling Conyza spp. at pre-sowing of soybean. The choice of pre-emergent or burndown herbicides must consider the history of use of the area, the weed community, and the cost of management, among other factors. Regardless of the choice, pre-emergent herbicides in combinations with burndown herbicides are important tools for the effective management of weeds.

This study fills a gap in the research since studies with the premixes sulfentrazone/diuron and imazethapyr/flumioxazin are not easily found in the literature in contrast to other products. Glyphosate was not used in this study, which characterizes the management adopted as an alternative to this herbicide.

Author's contributions

AJPA, LPA, SNRA and AAMB designed and conceptualized the experiments; WOS, JBL and MTYD carried out the experiments, and AFMS contributed to the data analysis and wrote the article. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Literature cited

Albrecht, A. J. P., Albrecht, L. P., Silva, A. F. M., Ramos, R. A., Corrêa, N. B., Carvalho, M. G., Lorenzetti, J. B., & Danilussi, M. T. Y. (2020). Control of Conyza spp. with sequential application of glufosinate in soybean pre-sowing. Ciência Rural, 50(9), Article e20190868. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20190868Links ]

Albrecht, A. J. P., Pereira, V. G. C., Souza, C. N. Z., Zobiole, L. H. S., Albrecht, L. P., & Adegas, F. S. (2020). Multiple resistance of Conyza sumatrensis to three mechanisms of action of herbicides. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 42, Article e42485. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42485Links ]

Aparecido, L. E. O., Rolim, G. S., Richetti, J., Souza, P. S., & Johann, J. A. (2016). Köppen, Thornthwaite and Camargo climate classifications for climatic zoning in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 40(4), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542016404003916Links ]

Belfry, K. D., Shropshire, C., & Sikkema, P. H. (2016). Identity-preserved soybean tolerance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technology, 30(1), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00082.1Links ]

Belfry, K. D., Soltani, N., Brown, L. R., & Sikkema, P. H. (2015). Tolerance of identity preserved soybean cultivars to preemergence herbicides. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 95(4), 719-726. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-351Links ]

Braswell, L. R., York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., & Seagroves, R. W. (2015). Effect of diuron and fluometuron on grain sorghum and soybean as replacement crops following a cotton stand failure. Journal of Cotton Science, 19, 613-621. [ Links ]

Braz, G. B. P., Oliveira Jr., R. S., Zobiole, L. H. S., Rubin, R. S., Voglewede, C., Constantin, J., & Takano, H. K. (2017). Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) control in no-tillage soybean with diclosulam plus halauxifen-methyl. Weed Technology, 31(2), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2016.28Links ]

Brum, C. S., Franco, A. A., & Scorza Júnior, R. P. (2013). Degradação do herbicida sulfentrazone em dois solos de Mato Grosso do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 17(5), 558-564. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000500014Links ]

Chahal, P. S., & Jhala, A. J. (2019). Integrated management of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Erigeron canadensis) with tillage and herbicides in soybean. Weed Technology, 33(6), 859-866. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.74Links ]

Ferreira, D. F. (2011). Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 35(6), 1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001Links ]

Ferrell, J. A., & Vencill, W. K. (2003). Flumioxazin soil persistence and mineralization in laboratory experiments. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51(16), 4719-4721. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0342829Links ]

Gallon, M., Trezzi, M. M., Pagnoncelli Jr., F. B., Pasini, R., Viecelli, M., & Cavalheiro, B. M. (2019). Chemical management of broadleaf buttonweed and Brazilian pusley in different application methods. Planta Daninha, 37, Article e019185625. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100098Links ]

Guerra, N., Haramoto, R., Schmitt, J., Costa, G. D., Schiessel, J. J., & Oliveira Neto, A. M. (2020). Weed control and selectivity herbicides pre emerging in garlic cultivars. Planta Daninha, 38, Article e020228966. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100074Links ]

Hay, M. M., Dille, J. A., & Peterson, D. E. (2019). Integrated pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) management in glufosinate-resistant soybean with a cover crop, narrow row widths, row-crop cultivation, and herbicide program. Weed Technology, 33(5), 710-719. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.62Links ]

Heap, I. (2021). Current status of the international herbicide-resistant weed database. Herbicide resistant action committee. http://www.weedscience.orgLinks ]

Hedges, B. K., Soltani, N., Robinson, D. E., Hooker, D. C., & Sikkema, P. H. (2019). Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane in Ontario with multiple effective modes-of-action in glypho-sate/dicamba-resistant soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 99(1), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2018-0067Links ]

Krenchinski, F. H., Pereira, V. G. C., Zobiole, L. H. S., Albrecht, A. J. P., Albrecht, L. P., & Peterson, M. (2019). Halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam: new option to control Conyza spp. prior soybean sowing. Planta Daninha, 37, Article e019189000. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100059Links ]

Lamego, F. P., Kaspary, T. E., Ruchel, Q., Gallon, M., Basso, C. J., & Santi, A. L. (2013). Manejo de Conyza bonariensis resistente ao glyphosate: coberturas de inverno e herbicidas em pré-se-meadura da soja. Planta Daninha, 31(2), 433-442. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582013000200022Links ]

Lavorenti, A., Rocha, A. A., Prata, F., Regitano, J. B., Tornisielo, V. L., & Pinto, O. B. (2003). Comportamento do diclosulam em amostras de um latossolo vermelho distroférrico sob plantio direto e convencional. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 27(1), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832003000100019Links ]

Lorenzi, H. (2014). Manual de identificação e controle de plantas daninhas: plantio direto e convencional. Instituto Plantarum. [ Links ]

Marinho, M. I. C., Costa, A. I. G., Vieira, N. M., Paiva, M. C. G., Freitas, F. C. L., & Silva, A. A. (2019). Validation and application of a QuEChERS based method for estimation of half-life of imidazolinone herbicides in soils by LC-ESI-MS/MS. Eco-toxicology and Environmental Safety, 167, 212-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.075Links ]

Moreira, M. S., Melo, M. S. C., Carvalho, S. J. P., Nicolai, M., & Crhistoffoleti, P. J. (2010). Herbicidas alternativos para controle de biótipos de Conyza bonariensis e C. canadensis resistentes ao glyphosate. Planta Daninha, 28(1), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000100020Links ]

Mueller, T. C., Boswell, B. W., Mueller, S. S., & Steckel, L. E. (2014). Dissipation of fomesafen, saflufenacil, sulfentrazone, and flumioxazin from a Tennessee soil under field conditions. Weed Science, 62(4), 664-671. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00183.1Links ]

Oliveira Neto, A. M., Guerra, N., Dan, H. A., Braz, G. B. P., Jumes, T. M. C., Santos, G., Constantin, J., & Oliveira Júnior, R. S. (2010). Manejo de Conyza bonariensis com glyphosate + 2,4-D e amônio-glufosinate em função do estádio de desenvolvimento. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 9(3), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v9i3.87Links ]

Osipe, J. B., Oliveira Jr., R. S., Constantin, J., Biffe, D. F., Rios, F. A., Franchini, L. H. M., Gheno, E. A., & Raimondi, M. A. (2014). Seletividade de aplicações combinadas de herbicidas em pré e pós-emergência para a soja tolerante ao glyphosate. Bioscience Journal, 30(3), 623-631. [ Links ]

Paula, J. M., Vargas, L., Agostinetto, D., & Nohatto, M. A. (2011). Manejo de Conyza bonariensis resistente ao herbicida glyphosate. Planta Daninha, 29(1), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000100024Links ]

Pimentel-Gomes, F., & Garcia, C. H. (2002). Estatística aplicada a experimentos agronômicos e florestais: exposição com exemplos e orientações para uso de aplicativos. FEALQ. [ Links ]

Queiroz, A. R. S., Delatorre, C. A., Lucio, F. R., Rossi, C. V. S., Zobiole, L. H. S., & Merotto Júnior, A. (2020). Rapid necrosis: a novel plant resistance mechanism to 2,4-D. Weed Science, 68(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2019.65Links ]

Rocha, P. R. R., Faria, A. T., Silva, G. S., Queiroz, M. E. L. R., Guimarães, F. C. N., Tironi, S. P., Galon, L., & Silva, A. A. (2013). Meiavida do diuron em solos com diferentes atributos físicos e químicos. Ciência Rural, 43(11), 1961-1966. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013001100007Links ]

Rodrigues, B. N., & Almeida, F. S. (2018). Guia de herbicidas. Editing authors. [ Links ]

Santos, F. M., Vargas, L., Christoffoleti, P. J., Martin, T. N., Mariani, F., & Silva, D. R. O. (2015). Herbicidas alternativos para o controle de Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. H. Walker resistentes aos inibidores da ALS e EPSPs. Revista Ceres, 62(6), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201562060004Links ]

Schryver, M. G., Soltani, N., Hooker, D. C., Robinson, D. E., Tranel, P. J., & Sikkema, P. H. (2017). Control of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus var. rudis) in soybean in Ontario. Weed Technology, 31(6), 811-821. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.50Links ]

Tahmasebi, B. K., Alebrahim, M. T., Roldán-Gómez, R. A., Silveira, H. M., Carvalho, L. B., Alcántara-de la Cruz, R., S De Prado, R. (2018). Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance. Crop Protection, 112, 350-355. https://doi.org/1C.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021Links ]

Trainer, G. D., Loux, M. M., Harrison, S. K., S Regnier, E. (2005). Response of horseweed biotypes to foliar applications of cloransulam-methyl and glyphosate. Weed Technology, 19(2), 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-127R3Links ]

Underwood, M. G., Soltani, N., Robinson, D. E., Hooker, D. C., Swanton, C. J., Vink, J. P., S Sikkema, P. H. (2017). Weed control, environmental impact, and net revenue of two-pass weed management strategies in dicamba-resistant soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 98(2), 370-379. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2017-0147Links ]

Velini, E. D., Osipe, R., S Gazziero, D. L. P. (1995). Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. SBCPD. [ Links ]

Weaver, S., Downs, M., S Neufeld, B. (2004). Response of paraquat-resistant and -susceptible horseweed (Conyza canadensis) to diquat, linuron, and oxyfluorfen. Weed Science, 52(4), 549-5553. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-03-102RLinks ]

Zimmer, M., Young, B. G., S Johnson, W. G. (2018). Herbicide programs utilizing halauxifen-methyl for glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in soybean. Weed Technology, 32(6), 609-664. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2018.60Links ]

Zobiole, L. H. S., Krenchinski, F. H., Pereira, G. R., Rampazzo, P. E., Rubin, R. S., S Lucio, F. R. (2018). Management programs to control Conyza spp. in pre-soybean sowing applications. Planta Daninha, 36, Article e018175883. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100076Links ]

Zobiole, L. H. S., Pereira, V. G. C., Albrecht, A. J. P., Rubin, R. S., Adegas, F. S., S Albrecht, L. P. (2019). Paraquat resistance of Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis). Planta Daninha, 37, Article e019183264. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100018Links ]

Received: July 30, 2020; Accepted: March 09, 2021

* Corresponding author: afmoreirasilva@alumni.usp.br

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License