SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.56Validity and reliability of the Colombian version of the individualized care scale patientCoinfection by SARS-CoV-2 with other viruses in patients from health institutions in the department of Boyacá, 2021-2022 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de la Universidad Industrial de Santander. Salud

Print version ISSN 0121-0807On-line version ISSN 2145-8464

Rev. Univ. Ind. Santander. Salud vol.56  Bucaramanga Dec. 2024  Epub Oct 08, 2024

https://doi.org/10.18273/saluduis.56.e:24040 

Research and innovation article

Description of elderly people with frailty in the city of Pereira, 2021

Descripción de las personas mayores con fragilidad en la ciudad de Pereira, 2021

Víctor Hugo Arboleda-Campo*  1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5620-0632

Diana Isabel Muñoz-Rodríguez2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-4813

Angela María Segura-Cardona2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0010-1413

Carlos Robledo-Marín2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6944-561X

Alejandra Segura1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-0952

Erika Giraldo-Gallo1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2262-7341

1 Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.

2. Fundación Opción Colombia - FUNDACOL, Medellín, Colombia.


Abstract

Introduction:

Across the world, aging in the elderly is accompanied by an increase in pathologies, caused by mobility restrictions, physical and psychological problems that characterize the fragile state.

Objetive:

To analyze the spatial distribution of frail people aged >60 years in Pereira, a Colombian city.

Materials and methods:

This was a cross-sectional study including 505 participants. Regarding geolocation, Google Earth and Qgis 2.16 software were used to create maps by neighborhoods and blocks and maps according to frailty.

Results:

In total, 4.4% of the people aged >60 years were classified as at risk of frailty, of which a significant relationship was found with disability, nutritional status and falls with a mean age of 71 years. Frailty distribution was shown to be unequal in the city's neighborhoods, with women being more frequently affected.

Conclusions:

The information will favor public health decision makers to plan and manage strategies to meet the needs of the population, whose geolocation will allow to provide better living conditions in old age.

Keywords: Spatial analysis; Elderly; Frailty; Medical geography

Resumen

Introducción:

en el mundo, el envejecimiento de las personas mayores va acompañado de un aumento de patologías, provocadas por restricciones de movilidad, problemas físicos y psicológicos que caracterizan el estado frágil.

Objetivo:

analizar la distribución espacial de las personas mayores con fragilidad en la ciudad de Pereira.

Materiales y métodos:

se trata de un estudio transversal con una muestra de (n=505) participantes, en cuanto a la geolocalización, se utilizó el software Google Earth y Qgis 2.16, para elaborar los mapas por barrios y manzanas y según la fragilidad.

Resultados:

en total, el 4,4 % de las personas de 60 o más años fueron clasificados en riesgo de fragilidad, de los cuales se encontró una relación significativa con la discapacidad, estado nutricional y caídas, con una edad media de 71 años de los participantes. La organización de la fragilidad mostró una distribución desigual en los barrios en el territorio, con mayor compromiso de las mujeres.

Conclusiones:

la información favorecerá a los tomadores de decisiones en salud pública para planificar y gestionar estrategias de atención a las necesidades de la población que al ser georrefenciada permitirá poder brindar mejores condiciones de vida en la vejez.

Palabras clave: Análisis espacial; Adulto mayor; Fragilidad; Geografía médica

Introduction

In the world, old age has gained attention because of both physiological and pathological effects leading to an impaired health condition1. The concept applies to people >60 years of age2. It is estimated that by 2050 such population will virtually double from 12% to 22%, reaching approximately 2 billion people3-5. Aging may be associated with an increase in pathologies resulting from mobility restrictions, physical and psychological problems characterizing the frail state6. Thus, frailty is a clinical syndrome affecting >10% of the elderly in the world and its prevalence increases at advanced ages. It is related to a dynamic process based on the downward path of physical function during aging, which may lead to functional loss and is associated with adverse outcomes ranging including falls7, from disability and hospitalization requirement to death8,9 and multimorbidity10.

As a result of the different approaches and measurement methods, there is no standard definition for frailty. Prevalence of the frail condition in older people in the community varies greatly (between 4% and 59%)11, which makes it difficult to adopt preventive measures to minimize its occurrence and adverse outcomes12. This situation is more evident in developing countries such as Colombia, due to the large inequality gap in the provision of health services in preventive care13, which adds to various socioeconomic components, barriers to access and mobilization, and the difficulties for a timely diagnosis14,15. According to the National Study on Health, Wellbeing and Aging (SABE), frailty reaches up to 17.9%16, with pre-frail state ranging between 18.7% and 53.1%17.

On the other hand, geographic information systems are an important tool for epidemiological investigation and surveillance as they integrate medical information with geographic data, environmental and socioeconomic variables, among other data18. The process requires knowing information needs, information sources, their organization and storage, use and distribution, all of which is the basis for knowledge creation19. This technique allows both early detection and decision-making in any geographical context18, and distributes health-related states or disease determinants for their control19. Consequently, improved access implies the absence of physical or geographical barriers preventing people from using health services20. This study was aimed to analyze the spatial distribution of frailty in people aged >60 years in Pereira, Colombia in 2021.

Methods

Study design

This was a descriptive study, with a cross-sectional, probabilistic and two-stage design. In the first stage, 51 neighborhoods were selected by the residents in the urban area of the surveyed city of Pereira, Colombia. The city was taken as a secondary unit of the sample by means of systematic random sampling; within each neighborhood, two blocks were selected as the primary unit of the sample, by simple random sampling.

Study population

According to the National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE), 78,127 people aged >60 years. were estimated in 202021 in the urban area of Pereira.

Data source

The information was collected between April and June 2021, within the framework of the cross-sectional project "Health and mental well-being of older adults in five cities in Colombia, 2020 (SABAM)"22. Pereira is made up of 19 communes with 360 neighborhoods of which, 50 related neighborhoods were considered as a primary unit. by simple random sampling, from which all the elderly people residing in selected neighborhood houses were included.

For frailty screening, coordinates were determined by address and located on a base map from the Google Maps program. The base of the communes and neighborhoods was used and a designation was made for each point of reference according to gender and frail state classification, to create the geodatabase with the corresponding information. In addition, the highest (red) and the lowest (yellow) frailty prevalence ranges were respectively designated by neighborhoods and blocks using the QGis 2.16 program.

Following frailty classification, the coordinates were manually placed with the data of the elderly in remote areas in the Google Maps program, locating the points of interest on the base map. For projections, information from the Agustín Codazzi Geographic Institute (IGAC) and National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE) was used in the QGis 2.16 software. Polygons of the census tracts were associated with individualized tables by census tract code and frailty classification, favoring spatial consultation. Based on this information, a map of surveyed neighborhoods was created including frailty proportion by neighborhoods and blocks (Figure 2).

Variables

Descriptive variables

Sociodemographic variables included city, age, gender, and household socioeconomic status (SES) of the home classified as low (1-2), medium (3-4) and high (5-6) stratum.

Outcome variable

Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL scale (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, weight loss)23, this instrument combines elements proposed by Fried and Rockwood in relation to deficits, and allows self-diligence24,25, an instrument that may be self-completed in less than 5 minutes25. The score ranges between 0 and 5 points depending on the evaluated items, with >3 reflecting a frail condition24. This outcome variable was related to the sociodemographic variables (city, age, gender, household SES), health status (poor, fair, very good, excellent)26, comorbidities (yes/ no), polypharmacy (>3 drugs), nutritional status (DETERMINE scale)27, depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CES-D)28, functional status (yes/not physically active), falls (yes/no), disability (yes/no), and basic activities of daily living (ADLs) (Barthel index)29.

Statistical methods

The categorical variables were described using absolute frequencies and percentages. The population characterization data and frailty components studied are presented as means and percentages with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI), comparing the groups (frail, pre-frail, non-frail). The free version of the Jamovi 2.3.18 statistical program was used.

To calculate the sample size, the Fleiss finite population formula was used, with a 95% CI for a sample of 381 older people, with a 15% expansion that reached a total of 506 older adults who signed the informed consent.

Results

There were 505 elderly people from the city of Pereira surveyed. Mean age was 69.6 (SD ±7.8) years (range 60-98 years). Approximately 52% were males and more than 45% of both men and women were pre-frail and frail (Table 1). Three quarters of the elderly were 60 to 74 years old, of whom 69.3% were pre-frail vs 4.7% who were frail. Regarding educational level, >50% had attended primary school (55.4% pre-frail vs. 5.0% frail). As about household SES, more than three quarters were from low SES (67.2% pre-frail vs 5.0 frail), and 20% of the sample were from middle SES (74.0 pre-frail vs 1.9 frail). About 56% were either on poor or fair health condition. In addition, it was found that approximately 37% of the elderly had >2 diseases. Over 55% were taking >1 medication, were physically inactive, reported having depressive symptoms and having experienced falls. However, according to the ADLs 61.4% were independent.

Table 1 Characteristics of elderly people as per frailty classification, Pereira, Colombia 2021 

Characteristics Total n = 505 Robust n = 138 (27.3%) Prefrail n = 345 (68.3%) Frail n = 22 (4.4%) X2 p
Gender
Female 239(47.3) 62 (44.9) 165 (47.8) 12 (54.5) 0.813 0.666
Male 266(52.7) 76 (55.1) 180 (52.2) 10 (45.5)
Age
Early elderly (60-74) 381(75.4) 99 (71.7) 264(76.5) 18(81.8) 2.26 0.688
Late elderly (75-89) 119(23.6) 38 (27.5) 77 (22.3) 4 (18.2)
Nonagenarian (>90) 5(1.0) 1 (0.7) 4 (1.2) 0 (0.0)
Education
Primary school 284(56.1) 82(59.4) 191(55.4) 11(5.0) 4.42 0.817
High school 127(25.1) 31(22.5) 91(26.4) 5(22.7)
Technical/university degree 40(7.9) 12(8.7) 25(62.5) 3(13.6)
Posgraduate study 7(1.4) 1(0.7) 5(1.4) 1(4.5)
No studies 47(9.3) 12(8.7) 33(9.6) 2(9.1)
Household SES
Low (1-2) 399(79.0) 111 (80.4) 268 (77.7) 20 (90.9) 8.15 0.086
Middle (3-4) 104(20.6) 25 (18.1) 77 (22.3) 2 (9.1)
High (5-6) 2(0.4) 2 (1.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Health condition
Poor 21(4.2) 11 (8.0) 9 (2.6) 1 (4.5) 9.52 0.300
Fair 265(52.5) 69 (50.0) 184 (53.3) 12 (54.5)
Good 111(22.0) 32 (23.2) 73 (21.2) 6 (27.3)
Very good 64(12.7) 16 (11.6) 47 (13.6) 1 (4.5)
Excellent 44(8.7) 10 (7.2) 32 (9.3) 2 (9.1)
Comorbidities
No comorbidities 155(30.7) 45 (32.6) 104 (30.1) 6 (27.3) 12.3 0.056
1 157(31.1) 35 (25.4) 112 (32.5) 10 (45.5)
2 161(31.9) 54 (39.1) 101 (29.3) 6 (27.3)
>3 32(6.3) 4 (2.9) 28 (8.1) 0 (0.0)
Medications taken
None 156(30.9) 49 (35.5) 102 (29.6) 5 (22.7) 5.87 0.209
1-3 medications 330(65.3) 81(58.7) 232 (67.2) 17 (77.3)
>4 medications 19(3.8) 8 (5.8) 11 (3.2) 0 (0.0)
Physical activity
Active 209(41.4) 53 (38.4) 145 (42.0) 11 (50.0) 1.24 0.539
Inactive 296(58.6) 85 (61.6) 200 (58.0) 11 (50.0)
Disability
No 366(72.5) 117 (84.8) 242 (70.1) 7 (31.8) 29.6 <.001
Yes 139(27.5) 21 (15.2) 103 (29.9) 15 (68.2)
Nutritional status
Good 179(35.4) 58 (42.0) 116 (33.6) 5 (22.7) 20.8 <.001
Moderate nutritional risk 133(26.3) 47 (34.1) 83 (24.1) 3 (13.6)
High nutritional risk 193(38.2) 33 (23.9) 146 (42.3) 14 (63.6)
Depression symptoms
No depression 177(35.0) 40(29.0) 129(37.9) 8(36.4) 3.08 0.215
Depression present 328(65.0) 98(71.0) 216(62.6) 14(63.6)
ADLs
Independent 310(61.4) 85 (61.6) 211 (61.2) 14 (63.6) 0.06 0.972
Dependent 195(38.6) 53 (38.4) 134 (38.8) 8 (36.4)
Falls
No 448(88.7) 131 (94.9) 302 (87.5) 15 (68.2) 15.1 <.001
Yes 57(11.3) 7(5.1) 43 (12.5) 7 (31.8)

SES: household socioeconomic status. ADLs: basic activities of daily living

Frailty prevalence was 4.4% (Table 1); components are presented in Table 2. As assessed by means of the FRAIL scale, about 49% of the population reported fatigue and <15% impairment of endurance, ambulation, and balance. It was found that about 45% were hypertensive and <15% suffered diabetes, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease/failure, angina, asthma, arthritis, stroke or kidney disease. This reflects approximately half of elderly people are affected by cardiovascular diseases, while respiratory diseases affect 8.7% and metabolic disorders about 29%.

Table 2 Elderly people distribution according to the FRAIL scale by gender 2021. 

FRAIL scale Total n = 505 Males n = 239 Females n = 266 X 2 p
Fatigue
At all times 17(3.4) 7(2.6) 10(4.2) 7.66 0.105
Most of the time 37(7.3) 13(4.9) 24(10.0)
Part of the time 195(38.6) 108(40.6) 87(36.4)
Very little time 101(38.0) 94(39.3) 195(38.6)
Never 61(12.1) 37(13.9) 24(10.0)
Endurance
Yes 79(15.6) 40(15.0) 39(16.3) 0.156 0.692
No 426(84.4) 226(85.0) 200(63.7)
Ambulation
Yes 50(9.9) 25(9.4) 25(10.5) 0.159 0.690
No 455(90.1) 241(90.6) 214(89.5)
Balance
Yes 33(6.5) 17(6.4) 16(6.7) 0.0190 0.890
No 472(93.5) 249(93.6) 223(93.3)
Comorbidities
High blood pressure
Yes 237(46.9) 120(45.1) 117(49.0) 0.746 0.388
No 268(53.1) 146(54.9) 122(51.0)
Diabetes
Yes 147(29.1) 70(26.3) 77(32.2) 2.12 0.145
No 358(70.9) 196(73.7) 162(67.8)
Cancer
Yes 15(3.0) 7(2.6) 8(3.3) 0.224 0.636
No 490(97.0) 259(97.4) 231(96.7)
COPD
Yes 19(3.8) 6(2.3) 13(5.4) 3.52 0.060
No 486(96.2) 260(97.7) 226(94.6)
Heart disease
Yes 6(1.2) 1(0.4) 5(2.1) 3.16 0.076
No 499(98.8) 265(99.6) 234(97.9)
Heart failure
Yes 20(4.0) 7(2.6) 13(5.4) 2.61 0.106
No 485(96.0) 259(97.4) 226(94.6)
Angina
Yes 11(2.2) 1(0.4) 10(4.2) 8.57 0.003
No 494(97.8) 265(99.6) 229(95.8)
Asthma
Yes 30(5.9) 15(5.6) 15(6.3) 0.0914 0.762
No 475(94.1) 251(94.4) 224(93.7)
Arthritis
Yes 76(15.0) 38(14.3) 38(15.9) 0.256 0.613
No 429(85.0) 228(85.7) 201(84.1)
Stroke
Yes 7(1.4) 3(1.1) 4(1.7) 0.274 0.600
No 498(98.6) 263(98.9) 235(98.3)
Kidney disease
Yes 12(2.4) 7(2.6) 5(2.1) 0.158 0.691
No 493(97..6) 259(97.4) 234(97.9)

COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

In the study, the prevalence of frailty in both old men and women was similar among pre-frail subjects aged 70-74 years and 75-89 years, while three quarters of those aged >90 years were males. On the other hand, its prevalence was lower among the frail, equally affecting both genders (Figure 1).

According to the map of Pereira communes, frailty is most common in El Triunfo and La Esperanza neighborhoods (Figure 2), where its prevalence exceeds 25%.

Figure 1 Prevalence of frailty according to gender and age of elderly people in Pereira Colombia 2021. 

Source: the autor

Figure 2 Prevalence of frailty in elderly subjects in Pereira, 2021 

Discussion

The prevalence of frailty in elderly people in Pereira is lower than that reported in the SABE for Colombia16, because this study was carried out in both urban and rural areas and with an instrument for measuring frailty. However, there is similarity to a study reported in Peru, in which it was identified that female gender and low SES are associated risk factors30, along with the presence of chronic diseases, which add to progressive physical capacity deterioration10,31. Therefore, primary health care detection of factors involved in frailty at a community level is important because this may offer an opportunity to identify any changes in elderly people and could also result in delaying progression of the condition.

According to a 2017 Australian geospatial modeling report, the growth of fragile populations in peripheral metropolitan, regional and remote areas can be reduced by targeting health interventions in these areas and improving access to support services32.

In addition, a relationship with disability is reported, which is similar to what was reported in another study in which it is associated with negative health outcomes33. It is associated as it can be marked by loss of independence in a multidimensional process resulting from the interaction between health condition and other individual factors such as age, gender, educational level, social and environmental factors9,33. Also, a relationship between fragility and falls was reported, which as mentioned in other research, may be due to weakness in the lower limbs7. Likewise, the study identified an association with nutritional status, probably due to inadequate nutrient intake and has also been shown in previous publications34,35. As this leads to muscle weakness and physical impairment impacting health condition, timely frailty identification could prevent deficiencies and limitations occurring in the elderly at different times.

Neighborhoods with the highest number of elderly people with frailty (i.e., El Triunfo and La Esperanza) belong to the Rio Otún commune, where the highest concentrations of frail people >60 years were seen according to the 2021 DANE report. Frailty was also found among those for whom carrying out any activity was most difficult; consequently, this reflects the need to undertake actions that allow early identification of this pathological condition leading to physical impairment in the elderly36, and also to implement plans focused on health promotion and disease prevention in the two mentioned neighborhoods. Future implementation of a notification and georeferencing system in the community to establish when a person is at risk of a fragile state in order to facilitate pertaining interventions was proposed.

For frail older people, there are different challenges related to their timely identification, which is why it is recommended to carry out new research on this topic, for the evaluation of the planning and implementation of public policies in this population group. Furthermore, the exploration of frailty is not part of the general medical consultation, and it is important to identify the conditions that are associated in the community, due to their growing interest as part of a continuous accumulation of deficits. The main limitation of the study consists of the type of instrument used to measure frailty, since it presents several phenotypes, which makes comparison between regions difficult.

Conclusions

Georeferencing implementation allows mapping location of vulnerable sectors with older people, which is important for data surveillance and control. It also highlights the need to recognize the changes occurring in the elderly, as in Pereira there is a large number of pre-frail women aged 60-74 years, so that decision makers may make proposals for improving this population health condition.

References

1. Vélez E, Centeno M, Zevallos M, Vélez J. El envejecimiento del adulto mayor y sus principales características. Recimundo. 2019; 3(1): 58-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/3.(1).enero.2019.58-74Links ]

2. Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg. 2022; 17(1): 334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1Links ]

3. Ortega L. D, Mendez F, Ortega L D, Mendez F. Survey on Health, Well-being and Aging. SABE Colombia 2015: Technical Report. Colomb Médica. 2019; 50(2): 128-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v50i2.4557Links ]

4. Daza M, Carbonell M. Manual básico para la evaluación psicológica de adultos mayores institucionalizados y sus familias. Ediciones Univ Coop Colomb. 54p. doi: https://doi.org/10.16925/gcgp.15Links ]

5. Cantú MP. Envejecimiento saludable y condiciones sociales de los adultos mayores en México. Rev Iberoam Bioét. 2022; 19: 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i19.y2022.005Links ]

6. Troncoso Pantoja C, Concha Cisternas Y, Leiva Ordoñez A, Martínez-Sanguinetti MA, Petermann-Rocha F, Díaz-Martínez X, et al. Prevalence of frailty among Chilean older people. Rev Médica Chile. 2020; 148(10): 1418-1426. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872020001001418Links ]

7. Ruiz Jasso LV, Sifuentes L D, Acevedo Alemán J, Torres Obregón R, del Bosque Moreno J. Fragilidad, polifarmacia y riesgo de caídas en personas adultas mayores. Gerokomos. 2022; 33(2): 95-98. [ Links ]

8. Teh R, Barnett D, Edlin R, Kerse N, Waters D, HAle L, et al. Effectiveness of a complex intervention of group-based nutrition and physical activity to prevent frailty in pre-frail older adults (SUPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022; 3(8): e519-e530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00124-6Links ]

9. Ma Y, Hou L, Yang X, Huang Z, Yang X , Zhao N, et al. The association between frailty and severe disease among COVID-19 patients aged over 60 years in China: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2020; 18(1): 274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01761-0Links ]

10. Longo M, Bellastella G, Maiorino MI, Meier JJ, Esposito K, Giugliano D. Diabetes and aging: From treatment goals to pharmacologic therapy. Front Endocrinol. 2019; 10. [ Links ]

11. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60(8): 1487-1492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.xLinks ]

12. Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster JY, Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Arch Public Health. 2015; 73(1): 19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-015-0068-xLinks ]

13. Garcia R. J, Nikoloski Z, Mossialos E. Inequality in healthcare use among older people in Colombia. Int J Equity Health. 2020; 19(1): 168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01241-0Links ]

14. Miguel Barbero C de, Miguel Barbero C de. Estandarización del diagnóstico y plan de cuidados enfermero ante el "Riesgo del síndrome de la Fragilidad del Anciano". 2020; 14(2): 14209. [ Links ]

15. Abbasi M, Rolfson D, Khera AS, Dabravolskaj J, Dent E, Xia L. Identification and management of frailty in the primary care setting. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 2018; 190(38): E1134-E1140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.171509Links ]

16. Ocampo Ch JM, Reyes-O CA, Castro X, Gómez F. Frailty in older adults and their association with social determinants of health. The SABE Colombia Study. Colomb Médica. 50(2): 89-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v50i2.4121Links ]

17. Cheng MH, Chang SF. Frailty as a risk factor for falls among community dwelling people: evidence from a meta-analysis. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017; 49(5): 529-536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12322Links ]

18. Torres HG, Mendoza MÁ, García EE, Martínez GA. Uso de una api de google maps para la georeferenciación de pacientes con enfermedad glomerular. Rev Colomb Nefrol. 2014; 1(Supl. 1). [ Links ]

19. Rojas C, Torres C, Manterola C, Lüders C. Gestión de información y epidemiología en el caso de la distribución espacial de personas mordidas por perros. Rev Cub Inf Cienc Salud. 2018; 29(4):1-11. [ Links ]

20. Molina G, Oquendo T, Bastidas D, Rodríguez S, Flórez M. Georreferenciación de la oferta de programas de salud pública en cuatro ciudades en el contexto del mercado competitivo del sistema de salud, Colombia 2014. Iatreia. 2015; 28(3): 223-239. doi: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.v28n3a01Links ]

21. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). Censo nacional de población y vivienda 2018-Colombia. 2018. https://sitios.dane.gov.co/cnpv/#!/Links ]

22. Cardona D, Segura A, Robledo C. Salud y bienestar mental de la persona mayor en cinco ciudades de Colombia. Año 2020. Vol 1. Primera edición. Universidad CES; 2020. [ Links ]

23. Chen CY, Gan P, How CH. Approach to frailty in the elderly in primary care and the community. Singapore Med J. 2018; 59(5): 240-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2018052Links ]

24. Van KA, Rolland Y, Bergman H, Morley JE, Kritchevsky B. The I.A.N.A. task force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008; 12(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02982161Links ]

25. Morley JE, Malmstro TK, Miller DK. A simple Frailty quiestionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012; 16(7): 601-608. [ Links ]

26. Axon DR, Jang A, Son L, Pham T. Determining the association of perceived health status among united states older adults with self-reported pain. Aging Health Res. 2022; 2(1): 100051. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahr.2021.100051Links ]

27. Cano SM, Garzón MO, Segura ÁM, Cardona-Arias D. Factores asociados al maltrato del adulto mayor de Antioquia, 2012. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2015; 33(1): 67-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.18825Links ]

28. Rueda Jaimes GE, Díaz Martínez LA, López Camargo MT, Campo Arias A. Validación de una versión abreviada de la Escala para Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos (CES-D) en adultos colombianos. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2009; 38(3): 513-521. [ Links ]

29. Pulgarín CLB, Ocampo JM, Marín-Medina DS, et al. Riesgo de caídas, según escala de Barthel y morse, en adultos mayores institucionalizados, Manizales, Colombia. Rev Inst Salud Pública Chile. 2019;3(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.34052/rispch.v3i1.71Links ]

30. Menéndez G. L, Izaguirre R. A, Tranche-Iparraguirre S, Montero R. Á, Orts C. MI. Prevalencia y factores asociados de fragilidad en adultos mayores de 70 años en la comunidad. Aten Primaria. 2021; 53(10): 102128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102128Links ]

31. Araya AX, Iriarte E, Padilla O, Araya AX, Iriarte E, Padilla O. Reconocimiento de la fragilidad en personas mayores que viven en la comunidad: un desafío pendiente. Gerokomos. 2019; 30(2): 61-66. [ Links ]

32. Taylor D, Barrie H, Lange J, Thompson MQ, Theou O, Visvanathan R. Geospatial modelling of the prevalence and changing distribution of frailty in Australia - 2011 to 2027. Exp Gerontol. 2019; 123: 57-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.05.010Links ]

33. Tchalla A, Laubarie-Mouret C, Cardinaud N, Gayot C, Rebiere M, Dumoitier N, et al. Risk factors of frailty and functional disability in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the FREEDOM-LNA cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2022; 22(1): 762. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03447-zLinks ]

34. Shalini T, Chitra PS, Kumar BN, Madhavi G, Reddy GB. Frailty and Nutritional Status among Urban Older Adults in South India. J Aging Res. 2020; 2020: e8763413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8763413Links ]

35. Valentini A, Federici M, Cianfarani MA, Tarantino U, Bertoli A. Frailty and nutritional status in older people: the Mini Nutritional Assessment as a screening tool for the identification of frail subjects. Clin Interv Aging. 2018; 13: 1237-1244. [ Links ]

36. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. La información del DANE en la toma de decisiones departamentates y municipales. Pereira-Risaralda. 2021:153p. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/planes-departamentos-ciudades/210924-InfoDane-Pereira-Risaralda.pdfLinks ]

Suggested citation: Arboleda Campo VH, Muñoz Rodríguez DI, Cardona Arango D, Segura Cardona AM, Robledo-Marín C, Segura A, et al. Description of elderly people with frailty in the city of Pereira, 2021. Salud UIS. 2024; 56: e24040. doi: https://doi.org/10.18273/saluduis.56.e:24040

Authors contribution

VHAC: participated in the macro project, directed the writing of the manuscript. Participated in data analysis and writing of the manuscript, as well as reviewing all versions.

DIMR: participated in the macro project, writing the manuscript, reviewing all versions.

DCA: leader of the macro project, obtaining financing. Manuscript writing, review of all versions.

AMSC: participated in the macro project,design of the statistical component, sampling and analysis. Manuscript writing, review of all versions. ASC y CRM: participated in the macro project, writing the manuscript, reviewing all versions. EGG data analysis, writing of the manuscript, review of all versions.

Funding This study was financed within the framework of the SABAM project with support from the Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry of Colombia and CES University, Registry code 67945

AI Thecnological support The authors report that they did not use Artificial Intelligence, language models, machine learning or similar technologies to create or assist with the elaboration or editing of any of the contents of this document.

Received: May 13, 2023; Accepted: July 24, 2024

* arboleda.victor@uces.edu.co

Conflict of interés

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License