SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número63Mapeamento sistemático de literatura sobre mau cheiro em requisitos de desenvolvimento de softwareIoT-LAT: Protótipo de gêmeo digital para a simulação de cenários educacionais dos laboratórios de arte e tecnologia do Instituto Departamental de Belas Artes - Cali índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Facultad de Ingeniería

versão impressa ISSN 0121-1129versão On-line ISSN 2357-5328

Rev. Fac. ing. vol.32 no.63 Tunja jan./mar. 2023  Epub 11-Jul-2023

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v32.n63.2023.14299 

Artículos

Methodology to Prepare Patent Analysis and the Technological Maturity Cycle

Metodología para la elaboración de análisis de patentes y ciclo de madurez tecnológica

Metodologia para elaboração de análise de patentes e ciclo de maturidade tecnológica

Santiago Sinisterra1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-9365

Rubén Camargo-Amado2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-0104

Diego Triviño3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8157-5302

Fiderman Machuca-Martínez4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4553-3957

1 Universidad del Valle (Cali-Valle del Cauca, Colombia). santiago.sinisterra@correounivalle.edu.co.

2 Ph. D. Universidad del Valle (Cali-Valle del Cauca, Colombia). ruben.camargo@correounivalle.edu.co.

3 Ph. D. Corporación Universitaria Comfacauca (Popayán-Cauca, Colombia). diego.trivino@correounivalle.edu.co.

4 Ph. D. Universidad del Valle (Cali Valle del Cauca, Colombia). fiderman.machuca@correounivalle.edu.co.


Abstract

The analysis of patents and the behavior of technology over time have aroused great interest at institutions and companies because they serve as a guide to make decisions on research and innovation projects. Based on this, a methodology that seeks to guide the reader in the preparation of this type of study; both the body of the document and its interpretation has been developed. Two software were used to describe the extraction of patent data; Orbit Intelligence (Licensed Software) and Lens (Open access version). The information obtained, using the same search equation, was presented. For the analysis of the technological maturity cycle, the logistic model was obtained, and it was executed in the Loglet Lab 4 software to obtain the growth curve S. Finally, the Yoon parameters were presented to give a predictive concept of the behavior of the technology over time. The case study that was taken as an example was the technology of “Antibacterial and self-cleaning surfaces based on TiO2/ZnO”, which applied this methodology, we found that the technology of interest is in the maturity phase. It has a high impact on the market, being an important indicator for decision-making focused on research and development. According to what has been proposed, the exposed methodology is a tool to have in consideration that allows to present a more accurate concept about the future projections of a technology, based on the analysis of patent data. Moreover, it is important to consider the trends of the market and the socio-political situation.

Keywords: forecasting; Lens; Loglet Lab 4; Orbit; patent analysis; technology life cycle

Resumen

El análisis de patentes y el comportamiento de la tecnología en el tiempo han despertado un gran interés en las instituciones y compañías debido a que sirve como una guía en la toma de decisiones sobre proyectos de investigación e innovación. Basados en lo anterior, una metodología que busca guiar al lector en la elaboración de este tipo de estudios, tanto el cuerpo del documento como su interpretación. Se utilizaron dos softwares para describir la extracción de datos de patentes Orbit Intelligence (Software licenciado) y Lens (Versión de acceso libre) y se presentó la información obtenida a partir del uso de la ecuación de búsqueda. Para el análisis del ciclo de madurez tecnológica se utilizó el modelo logístico y se ejecutó en el algoritmo Loglet Lab 4 para obtener la curva de crecimiento S. Finalmente, se proponen los parámetros de Yoon para dar un concepto predictivo del comportamiento de la tecnología en el tiempo. El caso de estudio que se tomó como ejemplo fue la tecnología de “Superficies antibacteriales y autolimpiantes a base TiO2/ZnO”. Al aplicar esta metodología, se encontró que la fase de madurez en la que se encuentra la tecnología de interés sugiere un alto impacto en el mercado. Este indicador importante para la toma de decisiones enfocadas a la investigación y desarrollo. De acuerdo con lo planteado, la metodología expuesta es una herramienta que permite presentar un concepto más acertado sobre las proyecciones futuras de una tecnología, basadas en el análisis de datos de patentes. No obstante, es importante tener en cuenta las tendencias del mercado y la situación sociopolítica.

Palabras clave: análisis de patentes; ciclo de madurez tecnológica; forecasting; Lens; Orbit; Loglet Lab 4

Resumo

A análise de patentes e o comportamento da tecnologia ao longo do tempo têm despertado grande interesse em instituições e empresas por servirem de guia na tomada de decisões em projetos de pesquisa e inovação. Com base no exposto, uma metodologia que busca orientar o leitor na elaboração desse tipo de estudo, tanto no corpo do documento quanto em sua interpretação. Dois softwares foram usados ​​para descrever a extração de dados de patentes Orbit Intelligence (Software Licenciado) e Lens (Versão Open Access) e as informações obtidas com o uso da equação de busca foram apresentadas. Para a análise do ciclo de maturidade tecnológica, foi utilizado o modelo logístico e executado no algoritmo Loglet Lab 4 para obtenção da curva de crescimento S. Finalmente, os parâmetros de Yoon são propostos para dar um conceito preditivo do comportamento da tecnologia em o tempo. O estudo de caso tomado como exemplo foi a tecnologia de “superfícies antibacterianas e autolimpantes à base de TiO2/ZnO”. Aplicando essa metodologia, constatou-se que a fase de maturidade da tecnologia de interesse sugere alto impacto no mercado. Este importante indicador para a tomada de decisões com foco em pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Conforme exposto, a metodologia exposta é uma ferramenta que permite apresentar um conceito mais preciso sobre as projeções futuras de uma tecnologia, a partir da análise de dados de patentes. No entanto, é importante levar em consideração as tendências do mercado e a situação sócio-política.

Palavras-chave: análise de patentes; ciclo de maturidade tecnológica; órbita; previsão; lente; Loglet Lab 4

I. INTRODUCTION

Technological innovation is one of the engines of economic growth for any company; therefore, it is crucial to estimate the scope of the technology to be developed and its possible potential to revolutionize the industry or the field of application. Decision-making in research and development is a fundamental to define project priorities and strategies, which entails an investment of time and resources with benefits projected in the medium and long term [1 - 2]. Therefore, understanding what can be expected from a technological development enables knowing its limits and the resources that will be needed for its creation and execution.

It is vital to predict if the project to develop a technology will be innovative and competitive prior to starting it up. To do so, it is necessary to implement methods that project the behavior of the technological development over time and the novelty it will represent in the market. This is an important pillar to maintain the competitiveness of a company. The analysis of patent databases and the analysis of the technology life cycle (forecasting) are two useful methods to identify the direction of technological growth and planning the development of a technology; in the industrial and academic sectors, They consist on examining the statistical, analytical, and methodological information contained in patent documents [3], along with the use of mathematical models to predict the behavior of a technology over time.

These methods have been used in different fields like research and identification of technological trends, e.g., 5G telecommunications [4], in water treatment [5], the automotive sector (hybrid and electric) [6], medical technology (electronic skin) [7], nanotechnology [8], emerging technologies in the energy sector [9], and in the development of population and cities using the logistic model [10]. The above confirms the versatility of these methods in various applications. Patent data mining can be made from specialized web portals, it could be directly from patent offices such as Espacenet (European Patent Office), USPTO (United States Patent Office and Trademark); or from software that allows broader analysis such as Orbit Intelligence (licensed software) or Lens (open access version).

Finally, there are guidelines on patent analysis [11], [12], like the Elsevier editorial, which presents some recommendations for writing scientific articles [13]. However, this methodology not only proposes a series of steps that provide the reader with a guide to conduct this type of analysis for any technology, but also how to use each software and interpret the results obtained and formulate a concept on the cycle of technological maturity based on the logistic model for forecasting [14]. Below, we summarize the importance of patent analysis for the development and competitiveness of a company or institution (Figure 1).

Fig. 1 Importance of patent analysis. 

II. METHODOLOGY

This methodology is designed based on different patent analysis papers and editorial recommendations, according with the methodologies applied, this one collect some of the most relevant concepts to guide the user and understanding the results from the software to prepare a patent analysis article (Figure 2).

Fig. 2 Methodology Scheme. 

III. RESULTS

A. Abstract

The Elsevier editorial establishes that the abstract must be concise and brief regarding what was done in the investigation. This part of the document shows a brief context and summarizes the main issues and results, it is also necessary to present a precise conclusion of the conducted analysis. The abstract must also contain the predictive concept on the future behavior of the target technology supported by the data, graphs, and comparisons shown in the document.

B. Introduction

The introduction must present, the appropriate references that support the topic of interest, as well as a brief theoretical introduction on the technology using reference reviews focused on the topic. It is preferable to cite previous analyzes on related topics, give a short introduction to the software to be used, describe the mathematical model that fits the evaluation of the technological maturity cycle for this analysis, and cite documents where they have been used. These can be both from the basic sciences and the social sciences. It should not be very extensive and the impact of this type of research in the academic, industrial, and financial fields should be clear.

C. Methodology and Data Collection

The methodology must present all the steps to get the data and the analysis that will be applied to obtain valid results.

D. Keywords

The keywords must define specifically the technology from which information is to be extracted; therefore, it is necessary to know if each one is really used in the field of interest. To validate them, it is necessary to find the corresponding thesaurus because keywords represent the concept on which the research is focused. The ScienceDirect platform enables the validation through a search for academic documents in the Elsevier databases; in this case, it would be used to validate the concepts related to the patent search.

Choosing a keyword will depend on the field and on the specificity, since a single word can be accompanied by another concept interferes with the data extraction. The image shows how the keyword “antibacterial” can appear in chemistry in different ways such as “antibacterial agent” or “antibacterial drug”; thus, it is necessary to be clear about the specific field to be studied.

E. Search Equations

Once the validation of the keywords is finished, it is necessary to build the equation that will be entered in the patent database. For this purpose, the Boolean operators “AND”, “OR” or “NOT” must be used. To create the search equation, it is necessary to use the manual of writing and nomenclature of terms of each one of the platforms [15], because the way of representing the words, in case of having compound words with “-”, “/”, subscripts, etc. may differ. For example: “Keyword 1” AND “Keyword 2” OR “Keyword 3”.

After having assembled the search equation with the validated keywords, filters must be set to ensure that the searched only in the fundamental parts of a patent and to avoid disturbances in the information. Otherwise, the keyword could be found in a patent reference without a significant value and affect the interpretation of results.

The applied filter will only relate the keywords to patents that contain them in the title, abstract or description. This way, it excludes non-relevant documents, as citations of other works. The literature recommends that patent analyzes are conducted within a time span of 20 years, the maximum period to renew a patent [16]. The selection of the filter by patent families is important because, in this way, the software will count each patent and its renewals as a single document, thus reducing the bias in the amount of data obtained.

The patent classification system also plays an important role in the quality of the obtained data. In general research topics on technology (e.g.: "nanomaterials"), a greater amount of data will be obtained if the International Patent Classification system (IPC) is used. However, if the research is on a more specific topic and the equation has a greater number of keywords, it is recommended to search in the Cooperative Patent Classification system (CPC), that contains information from the Office of European Patents (OEP) and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (example: “Titanium dioxide” AND “antibacterial activity” AND “coating ”) [17].

F. Data Mining and Results

After entering the validated search equation and the corresponding filters, Lens or Orbit will return the patent data that must be selected or grouped by patent families. Each software gives the option of analyzing the found the patents automatically. Among the graphs presented by the software, the user must select the one that you consider most appropriate for the research topic. Lens and Orbit show differences in part of the information they have access and its representation. Hence, we present the most important differences and graphs to make a correct decision about the software to use (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of the information provided by Lens and Orbit. 

Software/ Analysis Orbit Lens
Number of patents
Number of applications
Countries
Jurisdiction
Patent codes
Technology fields X
Companies
Institutions
Technology domain per company X
Inventors
Citation dependence X
Legal estatus
Investment trend X

Other graphs provided by both software offer the user a greater amount of information, that can be used to better interpret the results. The obtained data presents a first approximation to understanding the behavior of the target technology. However, it is important to be clear about what the trend of this technology will be in the future to design research and investment strategies. This point has aroused great interest in predictive models for the behavior of technology in the future, i.e., “forecasting” [18].

One of the ways to interpret this behavior is through the Technology Life Cycle analysis (TLC), It allows adjusting the data related to the technology of interest and extracted from indicators to a mathematical model that represents their growth based on the time through the logistic model, which is the most used for these analyses. For this, tools such as Loglet Lab 4 software can be used [19]. It fits these values to the model and represents them graphically.

Equation of the Logistic model:

Yt=L1+e-k(t-t0) (1)

Where Y(t) represents the indicator as the dependent variable of the S-curve, L is the asymptotic (maximum) value of the variable, t0 and k are model parameters automatically defined by the software and they define the midpoint and slope, respectively.

This curve by definition can be divided into different phases of technology as, presented by Ernst [18] (Figure 3).

Fig. 3 Technological maturity cycle. 

To obtain the accumulated values of the number of patents or documents to be analyzed, it is necessary to download the data from Lens or Orbit in “csv” format. Thus, they can be processed in Excel and used later in Loglet Lab 4.

According to Gao [20], the stages of development can be defined as follows:

Emerging stage: Low competitive impact and low presence in products and processes; Growth stage: Highly competitive impact without presence in products or processes; this is known as "pacing technology". Maturity stage: Highly competitive impact and product integration; at this stage, the technology is classified as “key/leading technology”. Saturation stage: Loss of competitiveness, it becomes a technology close to being replaced and the processes from this moment on will be focused only on cost reduction.

The indicators applicable to the model can show similar stages because, they are related to the investment and interest of the scientific community [21]. Some of the most used indicators in forecasting are: Number of patents granted, Number of patent families, Number of patent applications, Number of academic documents on this technology, Number of inventors, Number of citations, Public spending on research, and, Number of patents with renewal.

The graph of the logistic model can be constructed using these indicators to give an approximation of the state of the technology using as example the "Antibacterial and self-cleaning surfaces based on TiO2/ZnO" case:

The analysis tab gives the option to modify the mathematical model, either as Logistic, Gompertz, and Richards. To find out the appropriate model, it is necessary to consult the software documentation; however, in this type of study, the logistic model is generally used [14]. The time filter in the patent search engine is removed because it is necessary to consider the record of the first documents (patents or articles depending on the indicator) on this technology.

Once the accumulated data and the time have been entered, the “guess parameters” option will allow the software to estimate the model parameters. They can be entered manually with the advanced options, in this case, the least squares adjustment method will be used. Finally, when selecting the “fit” option, the graphs with the data fitted to the model will appear as shown in Figure 4.

Fig. 4 Results obtained for TLC and statistics. 

The percentages indicated in the statistics provided by the software will show the stages of technology development, making it easier to classify the stage of maturity, as follows:

  • 1% - 10% Emergent stage

  • 10% - 50% Growth stage

  • 50% - 90% Maturity stage

  • 90%-98% Saturation stage

  • ≥99%: Retirement stage

Reaching 99% means that the technology is about to be replaced or withdrawn from the market, this is known as the “Retirement Stage”.

Having the indicators evaluated in the Loglet Lab 4 software, it will be possible to give a more solid concept on the state of the technology from the TLC. Yoon raised a series of parameters that complement the life cycle analysis and can be calculated with the data obtained in the software [22], they are shown below.

The rate of technological maturity (TMR) enables modeling the technological life cycle described in equation (2), the number of potential patents to appear (PPA) (3), and the expected remaining life (ERL) (4). The last one can only be calculated if there is a defined threshold ρ for the technology under study. In this case, a value of 0.90 is estimated for ρ, which indicates that the threshold will be 90% of the total value of the accumulated patents in the saturation phase, that is, the inflection point in the maturity phase. Next, the Yoon approximation equations are presented:

TMRt=LnowL (2)

Where Lnow is the number of documents registered in the last year and L is the maximum number presented by the model for which a TMR of 100% (Retirement stage) is considered.

PPAt=L-Lnow (3)

ERLt=Tρ-t (4)

Where Tρ is the year with the cumulative number of patents ρ*L. Table 2 shows the parameters obtained by indicator and number of granted patents for the example in question:

Table 2 Yoon’s parameters for Antibacterial and Self-cleaning surfaces based on TiO2/ZnO [1]. 

Indicator Name TMR PPA ERL (90%) ERL (99%)
1 Granted patents 66.2% 179 7 18
2 Patent applications 90.0% 90 2 11
3 Scholarly works 61.0% 404 4 10

G. Discussion and Conclusions

The graphs obtained and the mathematically represented life cycle should help engineers to formulate a concept on the behavior of the technology. It must give a theoretical support to this behavior, contrasted with the current situation of society or the context of this technology. A clear example is the rising trend of patents in disinfection processes that may be linked to the recent Covid-19 pandemic. It is important to identify the leading countries in this technology, rather than the jurisdiction where they were patented, since it has been shown that the US market is the most desired worldwide [23].

After making a complete analysis of the technology, the concept of its behavior should be formulated and a possible strategy to be followed by the user should be clear. The leading countries and companies or institutions should be established, as well as the researchers and patents with the most citations in the field. This will action to be taken within the institution or company to achieve a better use of resources.

For the case presented in Figure 3, the life cycle analysis shows that the technology of "Antibacterial and self-cleaning surfaces based on TiO2/ZnO" is higher than 50%, which places it in a stage of maturity. It is also consistent with Yoon's parameters. This stage indicates that projects begin to focus on the innovation of products and processes related to this object of study. Thus, it appears as a leading technology and, innovations in this field will have a high impact. in the market.

Finally, if the user wants to make a first approach to patent analysis, Lens is a free access software that will enable learning how to interpret relevant data on technology, thus being a useful tool for educational purposes. Moreover, Orbit Intelligence, being a licensed software, has access to a greater number of databases and indicates the behavior of the technology more precisely. Therefore, it can be used as software for commercial purposes [23].

IV. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Innovation is a determining factor for the growth of a company or institution and its validity in the market. The efficient management of resources in the development of projects is essential. This type of analysis allows to recognize a clear trend of technologies in the market, which is vital for planning investment and strategies. The used software presents relevant data on the behavior of technology over time; however, Orbit has a more commercial focus due to its investment analysis. Lens, the free version, offers a first approach to patent analysis that can be used to conduct general analysis of the technology or as practice software to start in this type of study. The Loglet Lab 4 program offers different mathematical models and graphs that, complemented with the theory and experience of the researcher, allow formulating a strategic concept on the stage of maturity of a technology and the possible strategies to follow according to the results obtained. Finally, Yoon’s parameters are useful for researchers in R&D planning since results similar to the stages of maturity previously proposed are found.

REFERENCES

[1] S. Sinisterra, R. Camargo-Amado, D. Triviño, F. Machuca Martínez, "Análisis del Ciclo de Madurez Tecnológica de Superficies Antibacterianas y Autolimpiantes a base de TiO2/ZnO," Ciencia en desarrollo, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 115-127, 2022. https://doi.org/10.19053/01217488.v13.n1.2022.13590Links ]

[2] F. Machuca-Martinez, R. Camargo, O. Gutierrez, "Coronaviruses: A patent dataset report for research and development (R&D) analysis," Data in Brief, vol. 30, e105551, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105551Links ]

[3] J. Sheau-Pyng, L. Ming-Fong, F. Chin-Yuan, “Using Patent Analysis to Analyze the Technological Developments of Virtualization,” Procedia - Social and Behav. Sciences., vol. 57, pp. 146-154, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1168Links ]

[4] D. Kochetkov, M. Almaganbetov, "Using patent landscapes for technology benchmarking: A case of 5g networks," Advances in Systems Science and Applications, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 20-28, 2021. https://doi.org/10.25728/assa.2021.21.2.988Links ]

[5] G. Mao, H. Hu, X. Liu, J. Crittenden, N. Huang, “A bibliometric analysis of industrial wastewater treatments from 1998 to 2019,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 275, e115785, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115785Links ]

[6] M. Nagula, "Forecasting of Fuel cell technology in hybrid and electric vehicles using Gompertz growth curve," Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 73-88, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2014.1001601Links ]

[7] J. Yoon, B. Jeong, W. H. Lee, J. Kim, “Tracing the Evolving Trends in Electronic Skin (e-Skin) Technology Using Growth Curve and Technology Position-Based Patent Bibliometrics,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 26530-26542, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2834160Links ]

[8] M. E. Leitch, E. Casman, G. V. Lowry, “Nanotechnology patenting trends through an environmental lens: Analysis of materials and applications,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 14, e1283, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1283-9Links ]

[9] M. M. H. Bellido, H. L. Mendonça, M. V. de A. Fonseca, D. A. C. Branco, A. O. Pereira, “Maturity-based analysis of emerging technologies in the Brazilian Power Sector,” Journal of Cleaning Production, vol. 243, e118603, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118603Links ]

[10] X. Wu, “Application of Logistic Model in City Development Forecast,” in 2nd International Conference on Material Science, Machinery and Energy Engineering, 2017, pp. 706-710. https://doi.org/10.2991/msmee-17.2017.137Links ]

[11] Y. H. Tseng, C. J. Lin, Y. I. Lin, “Text mining techniques for patent analysis,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1216-1247, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.011Links ]

[12] A. Trippe, Guidelines for Preparing Patent Landscape Reports Guidelines prepared for the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) With contributions from WIPO Secretariat, 2015. http://www.wipo.int/tisc/en/Links ]

[13] Elsevier, 11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriously, 2022. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/11-steps-to-structuring-a-science-paper-editors-will-take-seriouslyLinks ]

[14] LogletLab4, Documentation Loglet Lab4, 2021. https://logletlab.com/loglet/documentation/indexLinks ]

[15] Lens, Support Center, 2021. https://support.lens.org/help-resources/search/scholarly-search/Links ]

[16] WIPO, Patentes, 2022. https://www.wipo.int/patents/es/Links ]

[17] B. Degroote, P. Held, “Analysis of the patent documentation coverage of the CPC in comparison with the IPC with a focus on Asian documentation,” World Patent Information, vol. 54, pp. S78-S84, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2017.10.001Links ]

[18] H. Ernst, “The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting: The Diffusion of CNC-Technology in the Machine Tool Industry,” Small Business Economics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 361-381, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007921808138Links ]

[19] P. S. Meyer, J. W. Yung, J. H. Ausubel, “A Primer on Logistic Growth and Substitution: The Mathematics of the Loglet Lab Software,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 247-271, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1625(99)00021-9Links ]

[20] L. Gao et al., “Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 398-407, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.003Links ]

[21] M. Baumann et al., “Comparative patent analysis for the identification of global research trends for the case of battery storage, hydrogen and bioenergy,” Technological Forecasting Social Change, vol. 165, e120505, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120505Links ]

[22] J. Yoon, Y. Park, M. Kim, J. Lee, D. Lee, “Tracing evolving trends in printed electronics using patent information,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 16, no. 7, e2471, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2471-6Links ]

[23] O. A. Jefferson et al., “Erratum: Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 8, p. 772, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0818-772aLinks ]

Citation: S. Sinisterra, R. Camargo-Amado, D. Triviño, F. Machuca-Martínez, “Methodology to Prepare Patent Analysis and the Technological Maturity Cycle,” Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, vol. 32 (63), e14299, 2023. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v32.n63.2023.14299

Received: May 19, 2022; Accepted: January 31, 2023; Published: February 09, 2023

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License