INTRODUCTION
Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy (MNTI) is a rare, pigmented neoplasm that originates at the neural crest. The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified it as a benign congenital head and neck abnormality,1-2 with expansive and locally aggressive growth, although a few cases with potential malignant transformation have been reported.2,3 It occurs mainly during the first year of life 4-6 as a mass affecting the maxilla; however, it has been described in the mandible, head, neck, brain, epididymis, mediastinum, shoulder, scapula, anterior fontanelle, femur, uterus, and ovary.2,3,7-8
This tumor has been referred to with a variety of names, including congenital melano-carcinoma, retinal anlage tumor, pigmented congenital epulis, melanotic progonoma, retinal choristoma,7,9 pigmented adamantinoma, melanocytic epithelial odontoma, melanocytic ameloblastoma, melano-ameloblastoma10 and melanocytoma.11
The morphological expression of MNTI is similar to small round cell tumors, so it is necessary to conduct differential diagnosis, including Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET, Embryonic Rhabdomyosarcoma, Lymphoblastic Lymphoma,8,11 Small Cell Desmoplastic Tu- mor, Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma, and Neuroblastoma10 (Table 1).
Features | Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET | Embryonic Rhabdomyosarcoma | Lymphoblastic Lymphoma | Small Cell Desmoplastic Tumor | Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma | Neuroblastoma |
Location | Femur, tibia, humerus | Soft tissues, orbit, nasopharynx, oral cavity | Distal femur | Intra-abdominal | Craniofacial (mandible) | Retroperitoneal (Suprarenal marrow. Zuckerkandl organ) |
Age | Under 20 | Under 15 years. Half under 5 years | Over 30 years | Young patients | 20-30 years | 18-21 months |
Sex | M: F: 1.4:1 | M: F: 1.5:1 | Same | Higher in men | Same | Higher in men |
Clinical | Pain/mass. Constitutional Symptoms | Infiltrating mass | Soft tissue mass | Intra-abdominal mass | Pain and edema | Mass, fever, anemia, diarrhea, increased urinary catecholamines |
Rx | Onion bulb-like image | Radiodense mass with poorly defined edges | Soft tissue mass and bone rarefaction | Solid intra-abdominal mass | Lithic and sclerotic image | Mass with calcification |
Macroscopy | Dark grey | Non-circumscribed fleshy mass | Fishmeal mass | Grey mass and satellite nodules | Firm to soft mass | Yellow nodular or multilobular mass |
Microscopy | Round, small, blue cell | Primitive cell | Multilobed, indented cell (Chicken cell lymphoma) | Small cell nests separated by desmoplasia | Round, small, blue cell. Cartilage and hemangiopericitoide vessels | Small round cell nests (Homer-Wright rosettes) and fibrillary matrix |
Immunohistochemistry | CD99, FLI1, CK | MyoD1, Myogenin | CD45, TDT, CD43, CD79A | WT1, CK, NSE, Desmin | CD99, SOX9, PS100, ERG, FL1 (-) | NB84, NSE, Chromogranin, Synaptophysin, CD56 |
Molecular pathology | EWSR1-ETS (Fusion) | Chromosomal gains (2, 8, 11, 12, 13, 20) | EWSR1 T-cell receptor gene | EWSR1-WT1 Fusion | HEY1-NCOA2 fusion | Amplified MYCN |
Treatment | Multimodal | Surgical, multimodal, and radiation therapy | Chemotherapy and radiation therapy | Surgical and Multimodal | Surgical | Surgical and Multimodal |
Prognosis | Survival 65% to 5 years | Survival 92% to 5 years | Survival 95% to 5 years | Poor survival | Very aggressive | Depends on the degree of differentiation |
Source: by the authors
The purpose of this report is to describe a new case of MNTI including a literature review. Since this is a rare pathology, it becomes necessary to report its clinical and radiographic characteristics, and especially the histopathological ones supported by immunohistochemistry techniques, providing clinicians with guidelines and tools to issue a comprehensive diagnosis and thus perform the corresponding treatment.
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 5-months-old female patient was referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service of the Hospital La Misericordia Foundation (HOMI) as she had a clinical condition of one month of evolution consisting of a progressively growing tumefaction in the upper lip and gum, limiting food intake because of pain, as well as mechanical difficulty for suction.
The physical examination showed a deformed contour with elevated alar base, deletion of left nasogenian sulcus, abnormal nose shape due to increased size, upper proquelia, and violet epidermis; intraorally, it had a pigmented and expansive fixed indurated mass measuring approximately 2.0 cm at the level of the alveolar ridge of teeth 61, 62 and 63, with defined edges compromising the vestibular floor (Figures 1A and 1B).
Computed Tomography (CT) was conducted with three-dimensional reconstruction, showing a multilocular, defined and expansive intraosseal lesion of isodense content measuring 27.4 mm x 13.7 mm x 17.6 mm (Figures 1C and 1D), partially obstructing the lower ipsilateral meatus with concomitant of left lateral nasal slope.
Upon informed consent, the tumor was removed under general anesthesia, using marginal resection and germenectomy of 61, 62 and 63. The HOMI Pathology Service received a surgical specimen with five lobed fragments of different size, the largest being 1.5 cm in diameter, violet, bluish and semi-soft, and three temporary teeth corresponding to 61, 62 and 63. The histopathological study showed a fibrous stroma lesion, with cell pattern arranged in alveoli and nests. The alveoli were peripherally surrounded by large cells loaded with melanin pigment and centrally occupied by groups of small neuroblastic cells, which are also grouped into stromal nests with isolated expression of cell crushing (the Azzopardi effect, due to fall of DNA from nucleus) (Figures 2A and 2B). Because of the patient’s age, location of lesion, its clinical characteristics (pigmented expansive mass) and location (upper maxillary middle line), the first clinical diagnosis option for surgery was MNTI. However, within differential diagnoses, the radiologists considered the possibility of an odontogenic or developmental cyst due to the defined and expansive radiolucent image observed in the anterior area of the maxilla.
The immunohistochemistry markers with positive results were: HMB45, cytoplasmic marker, marking melanocytes (Figure 2C), protein S100, cytoplasmic marker, melanocytic (Figure 2D), CD99 membrane marker, marking neuroblastic cells (Figure 2E) and enolase (NSE), cytoplasmic marker, neuroectodermal (Figure 2F), which were monitored. This set of microscopic (morphology) and immunohistochemical characteristics determined the final diagnosis of Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy (MNTI).
The patient was initially given weekly postoperative clinical and imaging checks during the first month, followed by monthly follow-ups, and annual orthopedic management-supported checks are currently carried out for further reconstruction by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service.
DISCUSSION
Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy (MNTI), first described in 1918 by Krompecher, reporting 215 cases since 1992, is a rare, pigmented, benign, locally aggressive, recurrent, and possibly malignant neoplasm with metastatic capacity. Histologically, it has a three-phase pattern of fibrous stroma, cell population grouped in alveoli and solid nests, which belongs to the group of small round blue cell tumors of neuroectodermal nature.2,7,8In the pediatric population, these include small, round cell tumors, Ewing’s sarcoma/ PNET, embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma,8,11 small cell desmoplastic tumor, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, Neuroblastoma (Table 1), small cell osteosarcoma, and Wilms tumor.10
MNTI has been associated with a mutation of the BRAF V600E gene.12 The Raf-MEK- ERK mitogen activates the protein kinase pathway, which is triggered by growth factors, hormones and cytokines that regulate the proliferation, differentiation, survival, senescence, and migration of tumor cells. Mutations of gene BRAF V600E have been identified in cells derived from the neural crest and large cells containing melanic pigment, which is based on the finding that the oncogenic mutation of BRAF V600E is a fundamental event in the melanotic neoplasia group, often defining diploid tumors and other aneuploids.12
Different theories have been described for its etiology: congenital melanocarcinoma derived from impacted epithelial remains, odontogenic epithelium and a phylogenetic origin.10,13 However, one consensus states that it originates from the neural crest. In 1969, Borello and Gorlin demonstrated the neuroectodermal origin of this tumor by histopathological analysis, as the cells resemble neuroblasts. Electron microscopy studies showed neurosecretory granules and detected high urinary levels of vanillylmandelic acid (VMA).10,12-14
It occurs most often in men (58%) than women (38.7%). The average age is before the end of the first year of life4,5,15 and the preferred anatomical sites are the cranio- maxillo-facial skeleton: midline maxillary bone (68%-80%), skull (10.8%), mandible (5.4%) as the case described in the present clinical case, in which the premaxilla and left maxillary portion were affected, extending to the floor of the nostrils. It may also occur in other sites, including brain, epididymis, mediastinum, ovary, uterus and the appendicular skeleton in femur.1,7,8,16-18
Clinically, it appears as a sessile-based, asymptomatic, unique, non-ulcerated, firm lesion, with increased lobular volume and pigmentation (blue, black or brown) that may or may not be seen in the soft tissue covering it.2,10 It shows an expansive, rapid growth, producing destruction of underlying bone, and possibly associated with displacement and alteration in dental de- velopment,7,11,15,16 invading neighboring anatomical structures such as the nasal cavity, orbit and base of the skull, as found in the patient of this case, with the mentioned tumor characteristics and extension to nostrils, and the need to remove dental germs.
Radiographically in CT, MNTI shows as a defined isodensal lesion, causing the expansion and destruction of cortical bone, simulating “floating” teeth (when presented in the maxillaries), sometimes associated with a sunburst spiculated periosteal reaction. The soft tissue component appears slightly hyperdense, which is attributed to melanin.2 In magnetic resonance, this tumor appears isointense or hypointense in the T1 and T2-enhanced sequences, showing improvement in contrast after gadolinium injection; the large amount of melanin pigment explains a T1- enhanced hyperintense sequence. The tumor may also contain areas of T1 and T2-enhanced hypointense sequences, corresponding to hyperostosis and calcifications.2,7,10
Macroscopically, the tumor appears as a multilobed soft mass that varies in color from grayish to dark blue depending on the amount of melanin pigment.18 Histopathologically, it shows a three-phase pattern consisting of fibrous-bottomed stroma and cells that architecturally are grouped in alveolar pattern and nests. The alveoli are marginally coated by melanocytes that are large cuboidal cells loaded with melanin pigment; light retains groups of small, round cells of neuroblastic nature that are similarly grouped into solid nests in the stroma and can show cell crushing, or Azzopardi phenomenon, which is caused by the fall of DNA from the nucleus,6,8 as shown in the histological images.
Electron microscopy has shown the presence of desmosomes, melanosomes and neurosecretory granules that is correlated with the expression of markers of epithelial, melanocytic and neuroectodermal in immunohistochemistry: CKAE1/AE3, Melan A, HMB45, protein PS100, SOX10, CD99, CD57 (LEU-7), NSE: (enolase) and synaptophysin.
Diagnosis should be established comprehensively considering clinical, imaging, pathological, ultrastructure, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics. The morphological interpretation and immunophenotypic expression in the present case guided the diagnosis with positivity for HMB45 and PS100 given the melanocytic differentiation, as well as positivity for CD99 and NSE (enolase) in small neuroblast-type cells.
Usually, the tumor has a benign, locally aggressive behavior, with recurrence of 10% to 15%, being eventually malignant in 6.97%, and acquiring metastatic capacity due to the proliferation of neuroblastic cells, with metastasis described in regional lymph nodes, liver, pleura, bone marrow, and pelvis.7,8,11,14-17,20
The perpetuation or involution of MNTI can be explained by the relationship of the stroma and its inflammatory infiltrate composed mainly of T lymphocytes, CD4 and CD8 regulators, dendritic cells presenting antigens and macrophages. At the onset of the tumor process, the inflammatory infiltrate is rich in M1 macrophages with a TH1 response; such response activates CD4 and CD8 T cells, producing tumor cell apoptosis, indicating that the TH1 or M1 response is antitumor or protective in nature. However, the tumor growth process and the production of IL- 10 exceeds the tumor protection capacity deranging the TH1 response into TH2 or with M2 macrophages, providing the lesions with recurrence and progression characteristics. This mechanism is possibly related to the action of IL-10 on neuroblastic cells, increasing the expression of CD138 and leading to the activation of FGF2, which causes neoplastic proliferation and adhesion of malignant cells to the extracellular matrix, prevents mobility, and allows for increased cell invasion and metastasis. Removing much of the tumor allows a greater infiltration of TH1; for this reason, in many cases the lesion involves without the need for complete resection.21
There is no real consensus regarding the management of MNTI. However, the treatment of choice is surgical resection with adequate safety margins3,22,23 as done in the present case. In cases in which the tumor affects the head and/or neck, or the jaws, proper margin resection is an important issue due to potential damage to neurovascular anatomical structures; when full resection cannot be achieved, chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, or carboplatin has been reported as an adjuvant treatment option to reduce recurrence rate,3,22-23 considering that chemotherapy is not a common treatment procedure, except in patients with confirmed metastasis and previously assessed by oncology.10
Small-molecule drugs targeting BRAF or MEK kinases have been approved for the treatment of BRAF mutation in melanoma, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor Ipilimumab, selective type 1 BRAF: Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor Trametinib. Treatment with these drugs has shown to be effective in decreasing tumor size, but the resistance is a problem in the management of melanoma. This drug resistance can be triggered by the genomic instability that leads to tumor heterogeneity, involved in cancer progression. Since MNTI is a benign tumor, the use of BRAF targets treatments with a greater chance of success represent a potential alternative in treatments for aggressive tumors with BRAF mutations.12
This finding is important in understanding the biology of MNTI; however, caution should be exercised because there are very few reports of pediatric patients with BRAFV600E mutant tumors successfully treated with Vemurafenib, which has shown to be safe in clinical trials of melanoma, but there are significant side effects with its use, ranging from rash, arthralgia, nausea, squamous cell carcinoma and liver damage.12
CONCLUSION
This case illustrates the benefit of multidisciplinary integration, as it shows the importance of taking into account variables of the clinical, imaging, pathological, and immunohistochemical expressions that help establish a correct diagnosis and ensure adequate therapeutic management, in addition to a continued presentation of new cases of this rare pathology.