SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue3Colombian biodiversity, an opportunity for the strengthening of the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industriesAnthocyanins Stability During Storage of Blueberries Juice author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Vitae

Print version ISSN 0121-4004

Vitae vol.23 no.3 Medellín Sept./Dec. 2016

http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v23n3a02 

Foods: science, engineering and technology

Prevalence of lactic acid bacteria in sliced cooked ham as an indicator of its shelf life

Prevalencia de bacterias de ácido láctico en jamón cocido friccionado como indicador de su vida útil

América Chávez-Martínez1  , José Carlos Rodríguez-Figueroa2  , Mario Gallego3  , Martha Estrada Gandarilla4 

1Ciencia y tecnología de alimentos, Microbiología de Alimentos. Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua. México amchavez@uach.mx

2Secretaria de Educación Superior, Universidad de Sonora. México

3Zootecnia y Ecología, Animal Science, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua. México.

4Estudiante, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua. México.

Abstract:

Background:

Ready to eat sliced-cooked-meat-products (RTE) are popular convenience foods. Slicing of such products at retail point is a common practice in supermarkets. Due to handling, as well as the supermarket environment, it has been suggested that the counts and presence of specific lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in these products may be associated with their rapid deterioration and short shelf life.

Objectives:

The aim was to quantify and identify LAB in commercial sliced cooked ham.

Methods:

Thirty samples of sliced cooked ham were collected from five supermarkets. Each sample was analyzed in terms of: Lactobacillus on De Man Rogosa, Sharpe agar (30(C), mesophilic (30(C) and thermophilic (37ºC ) Streptococcus on M17 agar containing 1% lactose, Lactococcus on LM17 agar containing 100 (g per liter of cycloheximide (25(C) and Enterococci on Kanamicin Aesculin Azide agar containing kanamycin (37(C), all under anaerobic conditions (Gas-Pack System(, BBL) for 48-72h. Twenty-one colonies were randomly picked and physiologically and biochemically characterized.

Results:

No difference was observed in genuses between supermarkets; however, significant differences were observed between microbial genuses. Enterococci showed the lowest count (2.34 ± 0.05 log10 CFU/g) and Lactobacilli had the highest counts (5.98 ± 0.04 log10 CFU/g). Of the strains isolated 23.8% were identified as thermophillic Lactobacillus, 23.8% mesophilic Lactobacillus, 28.6% Enterococcus, 14.3% Lactococcus and 9.5% Streptococcus. From these, only six could be characterized to species level; one was L.lactis subsp. lactis and five were L. amylolyticus.

Conclusions:

High LAB counts are a common cause of spoilage in RTE meat products, since these are commonly found in meat environments. Therefore a study on the processing, distribution and in-site handling of RTE meat products at supermarkets may be necessary in order to increase its shelf life.

Key words: cooked ham; Lactic acid bacteria; shelf life; Lactobacillus spp.

Resumen:

Antecedentes:

Los productos cárnicos rebanados cocidos listos para el consumo (RTE) son alimentos populares de conveniencia. El rebanado de este tipo de productos es una práctica común en los supermercados. Debido a la manipulación, así como al entorno del supermercado, se ha sugerido que los recuentos y la presencia de bacterias ácido lácticas (LAB) en estos productos pueden estar asociados con su rápido deterioro y corta vida en anaquel.

Objetivo:

El objetivo de este trabajo fue cuantificar e identificar LAB en jamón cocido rebanado en el supermercado.

Métodos:

se recolectaron 30 muestras de jamón cocido rebanado de cinco supermercados. Cada muestra se analizó en términos de: Lactobacillus en agar De Man Rogosa, Sharpe (30(C), Streptococcus mesofílicos (30(C) y termofílicos (37(C) en agar M17 conteniendo 1% de lactosa, Lactococcus en agar LM17 contiendo 100 (g por litro de ciclohexamida (25(C), y Enterococci en agar Kanamicin Aesculin Azide conteniendo kanamicina (37(C), todos bajo condiciones anaeróbicas (Gas-Pack System(, BBL) por 48-72h. Veintiún colonias seleccionadas al azar fueron fisiológica y bioquímicamente caracterizadas.

Resultados:

No se observaron diferencias en el género entre los supermercados; sin embargo, se observaron diferencias significativas entre género microbiano. Los enterococos mostraron los recuentos más bajos (2,34 ± 0,05 log10 CFU/g) y los lactobacilos los más altos (5,98 ± 0,04 log10 CFU/g). De las cepas aisladas 23,8% fueron identificados como Lactobacillus termófilos, 23,8% Lactobacillus mesófilos, 28,6% Enterococcus, 14,3% Lactococcus y 9,5% Streptococcus. De éstos, sólo seis pudieron caracterizarse a nivel de especie; uno fue L.lactis subsp lactis y cinco fueron L. amylolyticus.

Conclusiones:

Conteos altos de LAB son una causa común del deterioro de los productos cárnicos listos para el consumo, ya que estos se encuentran comúnmente en los entornos donde se maneja carne. Por lo tanto, es necesario llevar a cabo un estudio sobre el procesamiento, distribución y manejo de productos cárnicos listos para el consumo en los supermercados con el fin de aumentar su vida en anaquel.

Palabras-clave: Jamón cocido; Bacterias ácido lácticas; vida en anaquel; Lactobacillus spp

Introduction

Ready to eat (RTE) meat products are popular convenience foods. In recent years, the popularity of them have increased as they are a quick, easy and accessible option for consumers 1. They are retailed chilled with a shelf life depending on their formulation, and handling. During handling, which includes slicing and packing, these products might be contaminated with microorganisms from the supermarket environment (e.g. slicer, counter, refrigerator, staff, etc)1. In addition, if the cold supply chain is abused and the products are not handled as stated by the regulations, they might be rapidly spoiled. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widespread in nature and consistently exist on mucous membranes and body. Hence, they are part of the initial flora on raw meats after slaughter and in sliced cooked meats they are considered contaminants. LAB may inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms as a result of the production of organic acids and other antagonist substances (2; however, organic acids might also accelerate the decomposition of meat products (3. It has been reported that LAB cause acidification, increase viscosity, excessive drip and discoloration (greening) in meat products (4 -7). Kreyenschmidt et al. (2010) reported that the shelf life of meat products ends when LAB reach 107 CFU/g, as the product is no longer sensorially acceptable because of the existance of signs of spoilage such as off-odours and viscosity 6. Mexican legislation for meat products does not required analysis of LAB; although they are of great importance since they cause economic losses during shelf life. In Mexico, most RTE meat products are sliced at supermarkets, this practice may increases the degree of contamination since one slicer is used for different products. For these reasons the aims of this study were to quantify and presumptive identify LAB strains in sliced ham as an indicator of its shelf life.

Materials and methods

Ham samples

Six samples of 250 g commercial cooked ham sliced at the retail point and elaborate without starter cultures were obtained on six consecutive Mondays at the same time from five different supermarkets of the same retail chain in the City of Chihuahua, Mexico. The study was conducted from April to December 2012. Microbiological analyses were done within the first 24h, all samples were kept under refrigeration until analyses.

Microbiological analyses

Ten grams of cooked ham were taken aseptically, placed in a stomacher bag (Lab-blender type 80 Modelo: BA 6020, USA) with ninety ml of buffered peptone water (BD Difco(, Sparks, MO, USA) for 1 minute. After decimal dilutions, samples were surface-plated (100 (l) onto appropriate media. Lactobacillus were plated on de Man Rogosa, Sharpe agar (MRS; Oxoid(, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England), mesophilic and thermophilic Streptococcus on M17 agar (Oxoid(, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) containing 1% lactose (Sigma Aldrich, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England), Lactococcus on LM17 (BD(, Sparks Glencoe, MD, USA) containing 100 (g per liter of cycloheximide (Fluka Chemica(, Milan, Italy) and Enterococci on Kanamicin Aesculin Azide agar containing kanamycin (KAA; Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England). Incubation was at 30(C for Lactobacillus and mesofilic Streptococcus, at 25ºC for Lactococcus and 37ºC for thermophilic Streptococcus and Enterococcus, all under anaerobic conditions (Gas-Pack System(, BBL) for 48-72h.

In order to multiply the cultures, twenty-one colonies were randomly picked and inoculated in MRS broth at 30°C for presumptive Lactococcus, Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc, and in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI, Lab M(, Bury, Lancashire, UK) for presumptive Enterococcus and Streptococcus at 37°C. Then colonies were transferred to nutrient agar (Oxoid(, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) to assure purity. All strains were Gram stained and tested by the KOH method, catalase formation directly onto each plate, and morphology by phase contrast microscopy. The strains were cryopreserved in vials (Nalgene®) with liquid medium (60% glycerol (Fermont(, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México) and 40% of the strain in a liquid medium) at -20°C until they were used for characterization.

Working cultures were grown in MRS and M17 broth media for rods and cocci respectively. Overnight Gram-positive and catalase-negative strains were further tested for their ability to produce CO2 from glucose in MRS broth containing Durham tubes, growth after incubation at 10°C for 7 days, at 45°C for 2 days, and in the presence of 20, 40 and 65 g NaCl/L after incubation at 30°C for 4 days. Based on these results, all strains were presumptively classified to genus level (8), as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Morphological and physiological criteria used in presumptive identification of the isolates in this study 

+, Positive; (, negative; +/(, positive or negative; ND, not determined.

The fermentation of carbohydrates was determined on a standard liquid media using phenol red (BD, Sparks Glencoe, MD, USA) as pH indicator. The carbon sources were Arabinose, Cellobiose, Fructose, Galactose, Glicerol, Lactose, Maltose, Mannose, Mannitol, Melibiose, Melezitose, Raffinose, Rhamnose, Ribose, Sorbitol, Sucrose, Trehalose, Xylose added to the medium to a final concentration of 1% (w/v), and Salicin, added to a final concentration of 0.5% (w/v), (all from Sigma Aldrich, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England). Aliquots of 250 µL of each media were added to a microplate (Costar, Cole-Parmer, USA) and inoculated. Incubation was microaerophyically at 35°C for 24 h. Microaerophilic conditions were generated by sealing the microplate with parafilm. The carbohydrate fermentation was considered positive when the color of the media changed to yellow. The strains were presumptively classified to genus and species level by matching results with Bergey's Manual (8.

Statistical Analysis

Bacterial counts were transformed from CFU/g to log10 CFU/g. Data were analyzed by ANOVA with significant differences (p< 0.05). Subsequently the data were subjected to analysis of variance by fitting a model that included the fixed effects of supermarket, species and their interaction using PROC GLM( (SAS, 2002). The comparison of means was performed by the Tukey-Kramer test (SAS). The isolation and identification of LAB species was reported in the number and percent of isolations and the species identified.

Results

Table 2 shows LAB counts of sliced cooked ham analyzed in this study. Differences (p<0.05) between microbial genuses were found. Enterococci showed the lowest count (2.34 ± 0.05 log10 CFU/g) and Lactobacillus the highest (5.98 ± 0.04 log10 CFU/g). No difference (p>0.05) was observed in genus between supermarkets.

Table 2 Numbers of lactic acid bacteria from cooked ham sliced at retail point estimated in different microbial media 

ab Means with different superscripts in the same row differ (P<0.05). Lb=Lactobacillus, Lc=Lactococcus, Sm=Streptococcus mesophiles, St= Streptococcus thermophiles and E= Enterococcus. CFU/g = colony forming units per gram. 1 Lactococcus plated onto LM17 + 100 (g/lt cycloheximide (25ºC); Streptococcus onto M17 + 1% lactose (30 and 37, for mesophiles and thermophiles, respectively), Enterococcus onto KAA agar (37ºC), all incubated under anaerobic conditions

Table 3 shows the results of the 21 isolates that were randomly picked and presumptively identified as: thermophilic Lactobacillus (23.8%), mesophilic Lactobacillus (23.8%), Enterococcus (28.6%), Lactococcus (14.3%), and Streptococcus (9.5%). Of these, only six could be characterized to species level; one was L.lactis subsp. lactis (01) and five were L. amylolyticus (isolates numbers 13, 14, 19, 22 and 24).

Table 3 Morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of bacteria isolated from cooked ham sliced at retail point 

Morphology C = cocci, R = rods, Cc = cocci chains, + = positive, - = negative. Note: sugar fermentation is not shown.

Discussion

Lactobacillus had the highest counts (5.98 ± 0.04 log10 CFU/g) followed by Lactococcus and Streptococcus thermophiles (5.97±0.04 log10 CFU/g), Streptococcus mesophiles (5.90±0.04 log10 CFU/g) and Enterococcus (2.34±0.05 log10 CFU/g). Meanwhile, L.lactis subsp. lactis (1 isolate) and L. amylolyticus (5 isolate) were identified. These suggest that the products have consistent quality, in terms of BAL counts, regardless of the supermarket where they were purchased. Although different supermarkets were sampled, these were from the same retail chain, so it can be assume that the cleaning and disinfection protocols are the same in all sampled supermarkets. As reported by Kreyenschmidt et al. the shelf life of RTE meat products ends when LAB counts reached 107 CFU/g (8 log10 CFU/g) 6. The results found in this study were similar to those found by Pérez-Rodríguez et al. who reported LAB counts of 5.92 ± 1.06 log10 CFU/g in cooked ham (1). Moreover, Samelis et al., at the day of purchase, reported LAB counts of 3.48 log10 CFU/g; then, at day 15, counts exceeded 8 log10 UFC/g 9. This suggests that the samples in this study might have a shelf life shorter than 15 days since at the day of purchase counts were higher than 5 log10 for all microbial genuses but Enterococci. Borch et al. found that during the aerobic storage of cooked and sliced meat products the dominant LAB were Bacillus, Lactobacillus and Micrococcus4. In cooked sausages it was reported the presence of Pediococus, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus and Aerococcus (3. Gibson et al. studied cross contamination using a melamine copolymer resin (fluorescent compound) as a contaminant, demonstrating how easily the resin was distributed. It was identified that the most likely areas of contamination were; gloves, the slicing machine, the collection tray and the blade 10. Slicing is of vital importance, as the higher the contamination of cooked meats at this stage, the shorter the shelf life, independent of the storage conditions (7,11,12.

Respect to the strains presumptive identified L.lactis subsp. lactis and L. amylolyticus, Rodríguez et al. analyzed Spanish fermented sausages samples reporting the presence of Lactococcus and isolated two strains of Lc. Lactis13. While Hamasaki et al. identified strains of Lc. lactis subsp lactis in cooked sliced ham 14. The lack of reports on the presence of Lc. lactis in meat products may be attributed to the research being addressed to dairy products given the supposition that they are found only in them, so isolates are classified as “atypical” strains. Meanwhile, L. amyloliticus have been also isolated from fresh meats (15, so that its presence in cooked ham may be due to contamination. Although phenotypic characterization, based on sugar fermentation pattern and conventional phenotypic properties, might not always provide sufficient information for the reliable identification of LAB, this is a useful tool for presumptive characterization 16. The findings in this study may reflect the reality in Mexico, since all supermarkets are handled similarly in the deli area. However, these should be viewed with caution, since the samples were taken from one supermarket chain. Therefore, it is recommended that in future works, samples of sliced cooked ham are obtained from several supermarket chains. Likewise, Mexican legislation for cooked meat products does not require analysis of LAB, just some pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus, and Salmonella. The results of this study show the importance of LAB in cooked ham quality and its shelf life, suggesting that it is important to regulate their content and presence, to improve food quality by regulating the handling and storage.

Conclusions

The LAB initially present in the samples showed counts between 5.98±0.04 and 2.34±0.05 at the day of purchase, being Lactobacillus the most numerous group. L.lactis subsp. lactis and L. amylolyticus were identified as a spoilage bacteria of sliced cooked ham. Meat products are popular convenience foods that are highly perishable and rapidly spoiled due to defective handling. High LAB counts are a common cause of spoilage in meat products since these are commonly found in meat environments. The quantification and phenotyphic methodologies based on sugar fermentation are helpful to better understand the growth and presumptive identification of LAB as a spoilage microorganism of sliced cooked ham. The study of the evolution of the LAB microbiota in sliced cooked ham may be important for selecting the main deteriorating LAB aiming to decrease their presence in this food product. Therefore a study on the processing, distribution and in-site handling of RTE meat products may be necessary in order to increase their shelf life. Also, the evaluation might include enumeration and growth rate of LAB and the presence and quantification of organic acids and other chemical compounds.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Professional Development Program for Teachers (Programa para el Desarrollo Profesional Docente, PRODEP). The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

1. Pérez-Rodríguez F, Castro R, Posada-Izquierdo GD, Valero A, Carrasco E, García-Gimeno RM, Zurera G. Evaluation of hygiene practices and microbiological quality of cooked meat products during slicing and handling at retail. Meat Sci. 2010 May; (86): 479-485. [ Links ]

2. Piard JC Desmazeaud M. Inhibiting factors produced by lactic acid bacteria. 2. Bacteriocins and other antibacterial substances. Le Lait. 1992 March; 72(2): 113-142. [ Links ]

3. Ramírez-Chavarrín N, Wacher-Rodarte C, Pérez-Chabela M. Characterization and identification of thermotolerant lactic acid bacteria isolated from cooked sausages as bioprotective cultures. J Mus Food. 2010 July; 21(3): 585-596. [ Links ]

4. Borch EM, Kant-Muermans L, Blix Y. Bacterial spoilage of meat products and cured meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 1996 Nov; 33(1): 103-120. [ Links ]

5. Samelis J, Kakouri A, Georgiadou KG, Metaxopoulos J. Evaluation of the extent and type of bacterial contamination at different stages of processing of cooked ham. J Appl Microbiol. 1998 May; 84(4): 649-660. [ Links ]

6. Kreyenschmidt J, Hübner A, Beierle E, Chonsch L, Scherer A, Petersen B. Determination of the shelf life of sliced cooked ham based on the growth of lactic acid bacteria in different steps of the chain. J Appl Microbiol . 2010 Feb; 108(2): 510-520. [ Links ]

7. Pothakos V, Devlieghere F, Villani F, Björkroth J, Ercolini D. Lactic acid bacteria and their controversial role in fresh meat spoilage. Meat Sci . 2015 Nov; 109: 66-74. [ Links ]

8. De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer K-H, Whitman W, editor. The firmicutes. Bergey´s Manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol 3. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Ed. Williams & Wilkins; 2009. [ Links ]

9. Samelis J, Kakouri A, Rementzis J. Selective eject of the product type and the packaging conditions on the species of lactic acid bacteria dominating the spoilage microbial association of cooked meats at 4°C. Food Microbiol. 2000 Jun; 17(3): 329-340. [ Links ]

10. Gibson KE, Koo OK, O´Bryan CA, Neal JA, Ricke SC, Crandall PG. Observation and relative quantification of cross-contamination within a mock retail delicatessen environment. Food control. 2013 May; 31(1): 116-124. [ Links ]

11. Holley RA. Impact of slicing hygiene upon shelf life and distribution of spoilage bacteria in vacuum packaged cured meats. Food Microbiol . 1997 Jun; 14(3): 201-211. [ Links ]

12. Korkeala H, Björkroth K. Microbiological spoilage and contamination of vacuum-packaged cooked sausages. J Food Prot. 1997 Jun; 60(6): 724-731. [ Links ]

13. Rodríguez JM, Cintas LM, Casaus P, Horn N, Dodd HM, Hernández PE, Gasson MJ. Isolation of nisin-producing Lactococcus lactis strains from dry fermented sausages. J Appl Microbial. 1995 feb; 78(2): 109-115. [ Links ]

14. Hamasaki Y, Ayaki M, Fuchu H, Sugiyama M, Morita H. Behavior of psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria isolated from spoiling cooked meat products. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jun; 69(6): 3668-3671. [ Links ]

15. Schillinger U, Lücke FK. Lactic acid bacteria on vacuum-packaged meat and their influence on shelf life. Fleischwirtschaft. 1987; 67(10): 1244-1248. [ Links ]

16. Santos EM, Jaime I, Rovira J, Lyhs U, Korkeala H, Björkroth J. Characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria in “morcilla de Burgos”. Int J Food Microbiol . 2005 Jan; 97(3): 285-296 [ Links ]

Received: February 22, 2016; Accepted: November 15, 2016

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License