SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue4Factors associated with asymptomatic vertebral fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a rheumatology service in Bogotá (Colombia)Modifications in self-care, quality of life and therapeutic adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic treated by telehealth author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Colombiana de Reumatología

Print version ISSN 0121-8123

Rev.Colomb.Reumatol. vol.29 no.4 Bogotá Oct./Dec. 2022  Epub Aug 11, 2023

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcreu.2021.05.008 

Original Investigation

Systemic lupus erythematosus: Pharmacological differences between women and men and among age groups and geographical regions

Lupus eritematoso sistémico: diferencias farmacológicas entre mujeres y hombres, grupos de edad y regiones geográficas

Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepoa  b  

Camilo Alexander Constain-Mosquerac 

María Clara Mesa-Ardilaa 

Jorge Enrique Machado-Albaa   

a Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma SA, Pereira, Colombia

b Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Colombia

c Semillero de Investigación en Farmacología Geriátrica, Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Facultad de Medicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Colombia


ABSTRACT

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic and potentially fatal autoimmune disease. There are clinical differences between women and men and among age groups. Its treatment involves a heterogeneous group of drugs. The objective was to determine the pharmacological treatment patterns in a group of patients with SLE and compare them according to sex, age group and geographic region. This was a cross-sectional study that identified outpatient drugs used in patients with SLE from a population database of Colombians affiliated with the Colombian Health System. Sociodemographic and pharmacological variables were considered. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed. A total of 4307 patients with SLE were identified (median age, 44.2 years; 89.4% women). Disease-modifying antirheumatics were the most prescribed drugs (90.5%), especially chloroquine (54.4%), which predominated in all age groups and geographical regions. Hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate were the predominant prescribed drugs for women, while corticosteroids, chloroquine, azathioprine, and mycophenolate were the predominant prescribed drugs for men. The use of corticosteroids (prednisolone and prednisone) decreased with increasing age. Differences were found in the prescription of drugs for patients with SLE between women and men and among geographic regions and age groups. The use of chloroquine predominated over hydroxychloroquine, contrasting with clinical practice guidelines.

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus; Chloroquine; Women; Adrenal cortex hormones; Pharmacoepidemiology; Colombia

RESUMEN

El lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) es una enfermedad autoinmune crónica y potencialmente mortal. Existen diferencias clínicas entre mujeres y hombres, y entre grupos de edad. Su tratamiento involucra un grupo heterogeneo de medicamentos. El objetivo fue determinar los patrones de tratamiento farmacológico de un grupo de pacientes con LES y compararlos según el sexo, los grupos de edad y las regiones geograficas. Estudio de corte transversal que identifico los medicamentos de uso ambulatorio empleados en pacientes con LES, a partir de una base de datos poblacional de colombianos afiliados al Sistema de Salud de Colombia. Se consideraron variables sociodemográficas y farmacologicas. Se realizo un análisis descriptivo y bivariado. Se identificó a 4.307 pacientes con LES, con una mediana de edad 44,2 an˜ os y un 89,4% mujeres. Los medicamentos modificadores de enfermedad reumatica fueron los mas prescritos (90,5%), en especial cloroquina (54,4%), el cual predomino en todos los grupos de edad y las regiones geográficas. La hidroxicloroquina y el metotrexato predominaron en mujeres, mientras que los corticosteroides, la cloroquina, la azatioprina y el micofenolato, en hombres. Con el aumento de la edad disminuyo el uso de corticoides (prednisolona y prednisona). Se encontraron diferencias en la prescripción de los medicamentos empleados en los pacientes con LES entre mujeres y hombres, regiones geográficas y grupos etarios. El uso de cloroquina predomino sobre la hidroxicloroquina, en contraste con lo recomendado por las guías de practica clínica.

Palabras clave: Lupus eritematoso sistémico; Cloroquina; Mujeres; Corticosteroides; Farmacoepidemiología; Colombia

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic and life-threatening autoimmune disease that can affect any organ, such as the skin, kidneys, joints, central nervous system and cardiovascular system.1 Its global prevalence has been estimated at 9-241 per 100,000 person-years, with an incidence of 0.3-23.2 per 100,000 person-years, ranging from 2.4 to 7.4 in Europe to 7.9 in Central and South America and 8.1 in Asia.2 It is more common in women, with a ratio of women to men of 7-15:1 for adults and 3-5:1 for pediatric patients.2 However, in the latter group and in men, SLE appears to be much more aggressive, with a greater presence of clinical manifestations and higher severity.3,4

In Colombia, between 2012 and 2016, 431,834 cases of SLE were identified, with an unadjusted prevalence of 91.9 cases per 100,000 inhabitants; in those over 18 years of age, the prevalence was 126.3 per 100,000 inhabitants.5 There is evidence of greater aggressiveness in the clinical presentation of SLE in men, who present with greater lung involvement, longer hospital stays and high readmission and lethality rates.6

In the pharmacological treatment of SLE, antimalarials, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and biotech drugs stand out; these drugs are used to induce remission or reduce disease activity and prevent flare-ups and target organ damage.7 Management is individualized and must take into account the clinical manifestations, complications, severity and degree of disease activity.7-9 However, these drugs are not innocuous and maybe associated with adverse reactions, such as increased susceptibility to infections, increased risk of cardiovasculardiseases, diabetes and cancer, and decreased bone density.1,10

The existing information on the prescription patterns of drugs used in rheumatological diseases is scarce in Colombia, and an understanding of these patterns can help direct informed interventions that focus on the appropriate use of these drugs. Such prescription patterns vary among countries and may also differ among their different regions; therefore, we sought to determine the pharmacological management of patients with SLE and to identify the differences between women and men and among age groups and geographical regions in Colombia.

Materials and methods

This was a cross-sectional study on the prescription patterns of drugs used for patients diagnosed with SLE; the data were obtained from a population database for drug dispensing that collects information from approximately 8.5 million people affiliated with the Colombian Health System in six health insurance companies, corresponding to approximately 30.0% of the active population covered by the contributory or paid regime and 6.0% covered by the state-subsidized regime, which together comprise 17.3% of the Colombian population.

Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes related to SLE (M321, M328, M329) in the period from July 1,2019, to June 30,2020. Patients of any age and sex who were seen as outpatients and were under pharmacological management for SLE were selected. Patients with a concomitant diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus or drug-induced lupus and those diagnosed with SLE without pharmacological treatment were excluded.

Based on the information on the prescription of drugs to the affiliated population, systematically obtained by a dispensing company (Audifarma SA), a database was designed that allowed the collection of the following groups of patient variables:

1. Sociodemographic: sex, age (groups: <20 years, 20-39 years, 40-64 years and >65 years), health system regime affiliation (contributory or subsidized) and city of dispensation;

  • Geographical areas: The place of residence was categorized by department according to the regions of Colombia and considering the classification of the National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE) of Colombia, as follows:

  • Caribbean region: Atlántico, Bolívar, Cesar, Córdoba, La Guajira, Magdalena, Sucre, San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina.

  • Central region: Antioquia, Caldas, Quindío, Risaralda, Caquetá, Huila and Tolima.

  • Bogotá-Cundinamarca region.

  • Eastern region: Boyacá, Meta, Norte de Santander, Santander, Arauca and Casanare.

  • Pacific region: Cauca, Chocó, Nariño, Valle del Cauca, and

  • Amazon-Orinoco Region: Amazonas, Guaviare, Guainía, Vaupés, Vichada and Putumayo.

2. Drugs for SLE management:

  • Corticosteroids: prednisolone, prednisone, deflazacort, and methylprednisolone;

  • Synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs): methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and sulfasalazine;

  • Immunosuppressants: cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus; and

  • Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDb): rituximab, belimumab, and adalimumab; and

3. Comedications (grouped into the following categories): (a) antidiabetics (oral and subcutaneous), (b) antihy-pertensives and diuretics, (c) lipid-lowering drugs; (d) antiulcers, (e) antidepressants, (f) anxiolytics and hypnotics (benzodiazepines and Z-drugs), (g) thyroid hormone, (h) antipsychotics (typical and atypical), (i) antiepileptics, (j) antiarrhythmics, (k) antihistamines, (l) antidementia drugs, (m) opioid analgesics, (n) nonopioid analgesics, (o) bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, (p) antiplatelet agents, (q) anticoagulants (oral and parenteral), (r) antipsychotics, and (s) hormonal contraceptives.

4. Comorbidities: The main cardiovascular, endocrine, rheumatic, urological, kidney, psychiatric, neurological, digestive, respiratory and neoplastic diseases were identified from the reported ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Autoimmune rheumatological diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, vasculitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and systemic sclerosis) and non-immune diseases (fibromyalgia, osteoatrosis, osteoporosis and gout) were included.

Ethical considerations

The protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira in the "research without risk" category (approval number: 02-051020). The principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki were respected.

The data were analyzed with the statistical package SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 for Windows (IBM, USA). A descriptive analysis was performed; qualitative variables are presented as frequencies and proportions, and quantitative variables are presented as measures of central tendency and dispersion, depending on the normality of the data, as established by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were compared using Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using the X 2 test or Fisher's exact test. A statistical significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted.

Results

A total of 4307 patients with a diagnosis of SLE were identified, distributed in 135 different cities or municipalities. Of these, 89.4% (n = 3851) were women, and the median age was 44.2 years (interquartile range: 32.4-55.8 years; range:6.7-90.8 years); the age group distributions were as follows: <20 years (n = 198; 4.6%), 20-39 years (n = 1560; 36.2%), 40-64 years (n = 2120; 49.2%) and ≥65 years (n = 429; 10.0%). Most patients lived in the Bogotá-Cundinamarca Region (n = 1491; 34.6%), followed by the Caribbean Region (n = 1036; 24.1%), Central Region (n = 878; 20.4%), Pacific Region (n = 753; 17.5%), and Eastern Region and Amazonia (n = 149; 3.5%). A total of 91.2% (n =3926) of the patients participated in the contributory regime, and 8.8% (n =381) belonged to the subsidized regime.

Most patients with SLE were treated with DMARDs (n =3901; 90.5%), with apredominance of chloroquine (n =2343; 54.4%), azathioprine (n = 1579; 36.6%), hydroxychloroquine (n =1267; 29.4%) and methotrexate (n =758; 17.6%). Corticosteroids, especially prednisolone (n = 2915; 67.6%), were prescribed to 76.1% (n =3278) of patients; among immuno-suppressants, mycophenolate was the most prescribed (n = 719; 16.7%). The cyclophosphamide was prescribed to 36 patients (0.8%) while DMARDb were prescribed to 11 patients (0.3%).

A total of 71.4% (n= 3076) of all patients had some chronic disease. Of these, 67.8% (n = 2084) had one or two diseases, 23.6% (n=726) had three or four diseases, and 8.6% (n = 266) had five or more diseases. The 10 most common comorbidities were hypertension (n = 2012; 46.7%), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 532; 12.4%), hypothyroidism (n = 513; 11.9%), Sjögren's syndrome (n =489; 11.4%); diabetes (n =383; 8.9%); chronic kidney disease (n =277; 6.4%); depressive disorders (n =226; 5.2%); chronic pain (n = 207; 4.8%); anxiety disorders (n = 179; 4.2%) and fibromyalgia (n = 157; 3.6%). Polyautoimmunity (systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome) occurred in 21.6% (n =932) of patients. In addition, of all patients, 2.7% (n =115) had a diagnosis related to thrombosis. A total of 18.4% (n =792) of the patients had an infection-related diagnosis, including urinary tract infection (n =189; 4.4%), tuberculosis (n =47; 1.1%), pneumonia (n =39; 0.9%), meningitis (n =7; 0.2%) and sepsis (n=7; 0.2%).

The most common comedications were nonopioid analgesics (n = 2854; 66.3%), followed by antiulcers (n = 2391; 55.5%), antihypertensives and diuretics (n = 2234; 51.9%), antiplatelet agents (n=1210; 28.1%), lipid-lowering drugs (n = 1078; 25.0); antidepressants (n =1017; 23.5%), antihistamines (n =1002; 23.3%), opioid analgesics (n =949; 22.0%), thyroid hormone (n =922; 21.4%), antiepileptics (n =621; 14.4%), anticoagulants (n = 525; 12.2%), bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids (n =382; 8.9%), antidiabetics (n =262; 6.1%)), antipsychotics (n =68; 3.9%) and hormonal contraceptives (n =97; 2.3%).

Comparison between women and men

Significant differences were found in some variables between women and men. It was found that cardiovascular, renal and urological comorbidities were more frequent in men, whereas rheumatologic comorbidities (immune and non-immune) were more frequent in women. Regarding pharmacological management, corticosteroids, chloroquine, azathioprine and mycophenolate were prescribed more to men, whereas hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and leflunomide were prescribed more to women. Regarding comedications, analgesics were prescribed more to women, whereas antihypertensives, lipid-lowering drugs and anticoagulants were prescribed more to men (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables according to sex for 4307 patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus in Colombia, 2019-2020. 

Variables Women Men p
n = 3851 % n = 456 %
Age (median; IQR) 44.2 (32.6-55.7) 44.3 (31.2-57.2) 0.872
No chronic comorbidities 1095 28.4 136 29.8 0.534
With chronic comorbidities 2756 71.6 320 70.2
Cardiovascular 1807 46.9 241 52.6 0.021
Rheumatological 1124 29.2 74 16.2 <0.001
Inmune 933 24.2 57 12.5 <0.001
Non-inmune 328 8.5 20 4.4 <0.001
Endocrine 893 23.2 89 19.4 0.070
Neurological 533 13.8 52 11.4 0.142
Psychiatric 359 9.3 31 6.8 0.072
Renal 269 7.0 49 10.7 0.004
Gastrointestinal 257 6.7 21 4.6 0.085
Respiratory 99 2.6 13 2.8 0.734
Cancer 91 2.4 9 2.0 0.593
Urinary 36 0.9 24 5.2 <0.001
Pharmacological management - - - - -
DMARDs 3498 90.8 403 88.0 0.050
Chloroquine 2065 53.6 278 60.7 0.004
Azathioprine 1390 36.1 189 41.3 0.030
Hydroxychloroquine 1161 30.1 106 23.1 0.002
Methotrexate 694 18.0 64 14.0 0.031
Leflunomide 94 2.4 3 0.7 0.011*
Sulfasalazine 52 1.4 4 0.9 0.515*
Corticosteroids 2910 75.6 368 80.3 0.023
Prednisolone 2578 66.9 337 73.6 0.004
Prednisone 464 12.0 91 19.9 <0.001
Deflazacort 246 6.4 15 3.3 0.008
Methylprednisolone 144 3.7 12 2.6 0.225
Other immunosuppressants 716 18.6 121 26.4 <0.001
Mycophenolate 609 15.8 110 24.0 <0.001
Cyclosporine 104 2.7 10 2.2 0.514
Cyclophosphamide 30 0.8 6 1.3 0.269*
Tacrolimus 13 0.3 2 0.4 0.669*
DMARDb 11 0.3 0 0.0 0.620*
Belimumab 6 0.2 0 0.0 1.000*
Rituximab 3 0.1 0 0.0 1.000*
Adalimumab 2 0.1 0 0.0 1.000*
Comedications 3643 94.6 418 91.7 0.011
Non-opioid pain medications 2626 68.2 228 50.0 <0.001
Antiulcer 2172 56.4 219 48.0 0.001
Antihypertensives and diuretics 1961 50.9 273 59.9 <0.001
Platelet antiaggregants 1087 28.2 123 27.0 0.574
Lipid-lowering 917 23.8 161 35.3 <0.001
Antidepressants 934 24.3 83 18.2 0.004
Antihistamines 936 24.3 66 14.5 <0.001
Opioid pain medications 881 22.9 68 14.9 <0.001
Thyroid hormone 857 22.3 65 14.3 <0.001
Antiepileptic drugs 563 14.6 58 12.7 0.275
Anticoagulants 442 11.5 83 18.2 <0.001
Inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids 336 8.7 46 10.1 0.333
Antidiabetic 232 6.0 30 6.6 0.639
Antipsychotics 151 3.9 17 3.7 0.840

IQR: Interquartile range. DMARDs: synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. DMARDb: biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

* Fisher's exact test.

Comparison among geographical regions

The median age was higher in the Pacific Region than in the other regions. The proportion of patients with chronic comorbidities was lowest in the Caribbean Region, and cardiovascular diseases predominated in all regions. Patients in the Pacific Region had fewer prescriptions for corti-costeroids and mycophenolate but more prescriptions for chloroquine, azathioprine and methotrexate than did the other regions. Deflazacort was widely used in the Central Region. The use of anticoagulants was predominant in the Bogotá-Cundinamarca Region (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables according to geographic region for 4307 patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus in Colombia, 2019-2020. 

IQR: Interquartile range. DMARDs: synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. DMARDb: biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Comparison among age groups

Women represented the majority in all age groups. The proportion of comorbidities increased with increasing age. Cardiovascular diseases were predominant in all groups, but their frequency was higher in people older than 65 years. Prescriptions for corticosteroids decreased with increasing age, a trend that was observed with prednisolone and prednisone; for deflazacort, prescriptions increased with age. Chloroquine was predominant for those under 20 years of age, hydroxychloroquine was predominant for those between 20 and 39 years of age, and methotrexate was predominant for those over 40 years of age. Mycophenolate and cyclosporine were prescribed more frequently for children under 20 years of age. Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents were prescribed more often for patients older than 65 years (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables according to age group for 4307 patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus in Colombia, 2019-2020. 

Variables <20 years 20-39 years 40-64 years >65 years
n = 198 % n = 1560 % n = 2120 % n = 429 %
Woman 168 84.8 1396 89.5 1906 89.9 381 88.8
Man 30 15.2 164 10.5 214 10.1 48 11.2
No chronic comorbidities 94 47.5 592 37.9 487 23.0 58 13.5
With chronic comorbidities 104 52.5 968 62.1 1633 77.0 371 86.5
Cardiovascu ar 68 34.3 621 39.8 1080 50.9 279 65.0
Rheumato ogica 18 9.1 298 19.1 694 32.7 188 43.8
Endocrine 25 12.6 238 15.3 580 27.4 139 32.4
Neuro ogica 14 7.1 164 10.5 331 15.6 76 17.7
Psychiatric 5 2.5 100 6.4 237 11.2 48 11.2
Rena 9 4.5 114 7.3 148 7.0 47 11.0
Gastrointestina 6 3.0 62 4.0 164 7.7 46 10.7
Respiratory 3 1.5 11 0.7 62 2.9 36 8.4
Cancer 3 1.5 26 1.7 57 2.7 14 3.3
Urinary 1 0.5 7 0.4 33 1.6 19 4.4
Pharmacological management - - - - - - - -
DMARDs 185 93.4 1437 92.1 1919 90.5 360 83.9
Chloroquine 149 75.3 877 56.2 1134 53.5 183 42.7
Azathioprine 78 39.4 612 39.2 747 35.2 142 33.1
Hydroxychloroquine 33 16.7 566 36.3 563 26.6 105 24.5
Methotrexate 23 11.6 250 16.0 400 18.9 85 19.8
Leflunomide 0 0.0 28 1.8 62 2.9 7 1.6
Sulfasalazine 0 0.0 14 0.9 34 1.6 8 1.9
Corticosteroids 172 86.9 1262 80.9 1549 73.1 295 68.8
Prednisolone 159 80.3 1140 73.1 1371 64.7 245 57.1
Prednisone 55 27.8 268 17.2 206 9.7 26 6.1
Deflazacort 4 2.0 86 5.5 130 6.1 41 9.6
Methylprednisolone 7 3.5 57 3.7 77 3.6 15 3.5
Other immunosuppressants 83 41.9 391 25.1 317 15.0 46 10.7
Mycophenolate 72 36.4 343 22.0 268 12.6 36 8.4
Cyclosporine 15 7.6 41 2.6 48 2.3 10 2.3
Cyclophosphamide 0 0.0 25 1.6 10 0.5 1 0.2
Tacrolimus 0 0.0 6 0.4 9 0.4 0 0.0
DMARDb 0 0.0 6 0.4 3 0.1 2 0.5
Belimumab 0 0.0 4 0.3 1 0.0 1 0.2
Rituximab 0 0.0 1 0.1 2 0.1 0 0.0
Adalimumab 0 0.0 1 0.1 0 0.0 1 0.2
Comedications 179 90.4 1454 93.2 2010 94.8 418 97.4
Non-opioid pain medications 84 42.4 991 63.5 1467 69.2 312 72.7
Antiulcer 98 49.5 762 48.8 1258 59.3 273 63.6
Antihypertensives and diuretics 107 54.0 725 46.5 1114 52.5 288 67.1
Platelet antiaggregants 45 22.7 416 26.7 594 28.0 155 36.1
Lipid-lowering 15 7.6 271 17.4 620 29.2 172 40.1
Antidepressants 14 7.1 282 18.1 597 28.2 124 28.9
Antihistamines 36 18.2 359 23.0 501 23.6 106 24.7
Opioid pain medications 12 6.1 306 19.6 528 24.9 103 24.0
Thyroid hormone 15 7.6 208 13.3 533 25.1 166 38.7
Anticonvulsants drugs 17 8.6 164 10.5 373 17.6 67 15.6
Anticoagulants 11 5.6 209 13.4 240 11.3 65 15.2
Inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids 9 4.5 104 6.7 187 8.8 82 19.1
Antidiabetic 2 1.0 37 2.4 171 8.1 52 12.1
Antipsychotics 2 1.0 49 3.1 96 4.5 21 4.9

DMARDs: synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. DMARDb: biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Discussion

The prescription patterns of drugs used for patients diagnosed with SLE of any age and sex in a group of Colombian patients were identified, with characterizations of the differences or similarities in treatment according to age group, sex, and geographical region. SLE occurred more frequently in women, consistent with what is widely documented in other studies,11-15and the mean age (44.2 years) was in agreement with what was found in the United States (44.5-46.0 years)12,16 Switzerland (44.8 years)13 and Jamaica (45.1 years)17 but higher than previously described in Canada (40.6 years)18 and Colombia (38.4 years).6

Overall, corticosteroids were prescribed to 76.1% of patients, a similar rate to that found in the United States (78.8%)16 but much more frequent than that reported for Canada (53.2%),18 Puerto Rico (50.9%)14 and Switzerland (48.0%).13 Among DMARDs, the use of chloroquine stood out, differing markedly from reports in other studies where the use of hydroxychloroquine was predominant (43.4-91.3%).11,13,16,17 The probable explanation for this result is that in Colombia, hydroxychloroquine is not included in the health benefits plan and has a higher cost compared to chloroquine, which can make access to it difficult.19 However, chloroquine has been associated with greater adverse drug reactions and a worse safety profile, especially regarding the risk of retinopathy.20 It was found that mycophenolate was prescribed more frequently in Colombia than in countries such as Korea (2.2%)21 and the United States (3.3%),11 whereas DMARDb were rarely used, similar to what has been reported in the literature.11,21 In general, our hypothesis is that the differences and similarities found could be explained by the degree of activity and severity of SLE because in mild and moderate cases, antimalarials and corticosteroids are the recommended drugs, whereas when the disease progresses or is refractory, higher doses of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or DMARDb are necessary7-9; however, we do not know the degree of disease activity in this cohort.

In addition to the above, cyclophosphamide that is indicated in patients with lupus nephritis22 has been prescribed in 10.5% of patients in a Colombian cohort6 and in 29.2% of patients in a Latin American cohort,23 in marked contrast to the minimum proportion of patients who had it prescribed in this study. This is probably because cyclophosphamide when administered intravenously will require it to be performed in the hospital, and as the drug dispensing information used in this research only involves outpatient medications, it is highly likely that the patients who received this medication have not been fully identify them.

The prescription pattern for these drugs showed important differences when comparing women and men. There is limited information available in this regard; however, a study by Santamaría-Alza et al. that included 200 patients with SLE found significant differences in the use of cyclophosphamide between women and men (8.3% vs. 22.6%, respectively, p = 0.017),6 a result that was not found in this study. In addition, they found no differences in the proportion of use of other drugs used to manage SLE,6 which contrasts with the results found in the present study, i.e., corticosteroid, chloroquine, azathioprine and mycophenolate prescriptions were predominant for men, whereas azathioprine and hydroxychloroquine prescription were predominant for women. These findings are related to the clinical differences and the frequency of complications between women and men; renal disease, serositis and thrombocytopenia are predominant in the latter.24 In the United States, Pelletier et al. compared patients with and without lupus nephritis and found that the use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and antimalarials was more frequent in patients with kidney disease.25

Different clinical pictures of SLE have been observed in children and adults. In children, the disease is more active, with a much more aggressive progression and with more complications, which affects the type of treatment used.3,15,26 In this analysis, prescription patterns were investigated according to age group, showing greater use of chloroquine, immunosup-pressants and corticosteroids in patients under 20 years of age. A study conducted in Canada compared pediatric and adult patients with SLE and reported similar findings; i.e., corticosteroids (97.0% vs. 70.0%; p < 0.0001) and immunosuppressants (66.0% vs. 37.0%; p = 0.0001) were prescribed more to children, whereas methotrexate was prescribed more to adults (31.0% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.009).15 In Hungary, it was found that mycophe-nolate was prescribed much more frequently to children than to adults (15.2% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.0056),26 results that are similar to those for the United States (28.1 vs. 13.0; p<0.001)27 and in agreement with our results.

The drugs used for the management of SLE were prescribed differently among the different geographical regions of Colombia. This pattern had already been evidenced in another pharmacoepidemiological study that compared the prescription of ambulatory antibiotics in the different regions of the country28 and is probably due to the prescribing habits of physicians, to the academic training of physicians, to the variability in the availability of drugs, to the influence of the pharmaceutical industry and to the health system affiliation regime. Thus, for example, in Argentina, cyclophosphamide was administered more frequently in the public health system than in the private system, while the use of corticosteroids, antimalarials and immunosuppressants was similar between the two systems.29

Finally, it is important to highlight that, during the study period, the first months of the mandatory preventive isolation (confinement) caused by the pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Colombia were included, without affecting the dispensing of drugs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus present in the study.

Some limitations in the interpretation of the results are recognized because access to medical records was not obtained to verify the patients' diagnoses and their hospitalizations and the activity, severity and complications of the disease or comorbidity such as antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. In addition, the drugs prescribed outside the health system or that were not delivered by the dispensing company and the drug induction cycles that the patients may have received are unknown. However, the sample included many patients distributed throughout most of the Colombian territory and both the contributory and subsidized regimes.

Conclusions

Given the above findings, it can be concluded that there are differences in the prescription of drugs used for patients with SLE according to age group, sex and geographical regions of the country. Patients with SLE in Colombia are treated with DMARDs, especially chloroquine and azathioprine, with corticosteroids, particularly prednisolone, and with immunosuppressants such as mycophenolate, and infrequently receive DMARDb. In addition, they frequently have cardiovascular, rheumatologic and endocrine comorbidities and, in addition to drugs for the management of SLE, are prescribed nonopioid analgesics, antiulcers and antihyperten-sives. Knowledge of the differences in management found can be useful to guide treating physicians and health plan administrators to manage the resources necessary to meet the needs of this important group of patients.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Soffy Claritza López for her work in obtaining the database.

REFERENCES

1. Kaul A, Gordon C, Crow MK, Touma Z, Urowitz MB, van Vollenhoven R, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16039, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.39. [ Links ]

2. Gergianaki I, Bortoluzzi A, Bertsias G. Update on the epidemiology, risk factors, and disease outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32:188-205, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2018.09.004. [ Links ]

3. Bundhun PK, Kumari A, Huang F. Differences in clinical features observed between childhood-onset versus adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e8086, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008086. [ Links ]

4. Stefanidou S, Benos A, Galanopoulou V, Chatziyannis I, Kanakoudi F, Aslanidis S, et al. Clinical expression and morbidity of systemic lupus erythematosus during a post-diagnostic 5-year follow-up: a male:female comparison. Lupus. 2011;20:1090-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203311403640. [ Links ]

5. Fernández-Ávila DG, Bernal-Macías S, Rincón-Riano DN, Gutiérrez Dávila JM, Rosselli D. Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in Colombia: data from the national health registry 2012-2016. Lupus. 2019;28:1273-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203319864168. [ Links ]

6. Santamaría-Alza Y, Motta JZN, Fajardo-Rivero JE, Pineda CLF. Systemic lupus erythematosus, gender differences in Colombian patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:2423-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-4161-8. [ Links ]

7. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis JN, et al. 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:736-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215089. [ Links ]

8. Gordon C, Amissah-Arthur MB, Gayed M, Brown S, Bruce IN, D'Cruz D, et al. The British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus in adults: executive summary. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57:14-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex291. [ Links ]

9. Pons-Estel BA, Bonfa E, Soriano ER, Cardiel MH, Izcovich A, Popoff F, et al. First Latin American clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: Latin American Group for the Study of Lupus (GLADEL, Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio del Lupus)-Pan-American League of Associations of Rheumatology (PANLAR). Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1549-57, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213512. [ Links ]

10. Singh JA, Hossain A, Kotb A, Wells G. Risk of serious infections with immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticoids for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2016;14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0673-8. [ Links ]

11. Kariburyo F, Xie L, Sah J, Li N, Lofland JH. Real-world medication use and economic outcomes in incident systemic lupus erythematosus patients in the United States. J Med Econ. 2020;23:1-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1678170. [ Links ]

12. Kan H, Nagar S, Patel J, Wallace DJ, Molta C, Chang DJ. Longitudinal treatment patterns and associated outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Ther. 2016;38:610-24, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.016. [ Links ]

13. Ribi C, Trendelenburg M, Gayet-Ageron A, Cohen C, Dayer E, Eisenberger U, et al. The Swiss Systemic lupus erythematosus Cohort Study (SSCS) - cross-sectional analysis of clinical characteristics and treatments across different medical disciplines in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13990, http://dx.doi.org/10.4414/smw.2014.13990. [ Links ]

14. Molina MJ, Mayor AM, Franco AE, Morell CA, López MA, Vilá LM. Utilization of health services and prescription patterns among lupus patients followed by primary care physicians and rheumatologist in Puerto Rico. Ethn Dis. 2008;182 Suppl. 2:S2-205. [ Links ]

15. Brunner HI, Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MD, Silverman ED. Difference in disease features between childhood-onset and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:556-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.23204. [ Links ]

16. Nyman E, Vaughan T, Desta B, Wang X, Barut V, Emmas C. Characteristics and symptom severity of patients reporting systemic lupus erythematosus in the patientslikeme online health community: a retrospective observational study. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7:201-13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00195-7. [ Links ]

17. Maloney KC, Ferguson TS, Stewart HD, Myers AA, De Ceulaer K. Clinical and immunological characteristics of 150 systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Jamaica: a comparative analysis. Lupus. 2017;26:1448-56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203317707828. [ Links ]

18. Hanly JG, Sayani A, Doucette S, Iczkovitz S, Terres JAR. Treatment pathways in an inception lupus cohort over the first three years. Lupus. 2017;26:119-24, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203316655213. [ Links ]

19. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución número 0003512 de 2019. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/salud/POS/Paginas/plan-obligatorio-de-salud-pos.aspx [accessed 21.9.20]. [ Links ]

20 Dos Reis Neto ET, Kakehasi AM, de Medeiros Pinheiro M, Ferreira GA, Marques CDL, da Mota LMH, et al. Revisiting hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for patients with chronic immunity-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Adv Rheumatol. 2020;60:32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42358-020-00134-8. [ Links ]

21. Shin S. Drug utilization and therapy provision patterns by prescriber types among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Korea. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1779-87, http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S146119. [ Links ]

22. Cyclophosphamide. In: Drug Point Summary [database on the Internet]. Greenwood Village (CO): IBM Corporation; 2021. Available from: www.micromedexsolutions.com [cited 19.5.21]. Subscription required to view. [ Links ]

23. Pons-Estel GJ, Catoggio LJ, Cardiel MH, Bonfa E, Caeiro F, Sato E, et al. Lupus in Latin-American patients: lessons from the GLADEL cohort. Lupus. 2015;24:536-45. [ Links ]

24. Boodhoo KD, Liu S, Zuo X. Impact of sex disparities on the clinical manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4272, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004272. [ Links ]

25. Pelletier EM, Ogale S, Yu E, Brunetta P, Garg J. Economic outcomes in patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus with versus without nephritis: results from an analysis of data from a US claims database. Clin Ther. 2009;31:2653-64, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.032. [ Links ]

26. Tarr T, Dérfalvi B, Gyori N, Szántó A, Siminszky Z, Malik A, et al. Similarities and differences between pediatric and adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015;24:796-803, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203314563817. [ Links ]

27. Hersh AO, von Scheven E, Yazdany J, Panopalis P, Trupin L, Julian L, et al. Differences in long-term disease activity and treatment of adult patients with childhood- and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:13-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.24091. [ Links ]

28. Machado-Alba JE, Valladales-Restrepo LF, Gaviria-Mendoza A, Machado-Duque ME, Figueras A. Patterns of antibiotic prescription in Colombia: are there differences between capital cities and municipalities? Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9:389, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9070389. [ Links ]

29. Schmid MM, Roverano SG, Paira SO. Comparing demographics, clinical presentation, treatments and outcome between systemic lupus erythematosus patients treated in a public and private health system in Santa Fe, Argentina. Reumatol Clin. 2014;10:294-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reuma.2013.12.009. [ Links ]

Sources of funding The present study did not receive funding.

Received: October 27, 2020; Accepted: May 21, 2021

*Corresponding author. E-mail address: machado@utp.edu.co (J.E. Machado-Alba).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License