SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue3Use of disaccharides and activated carbon to preserve cellulolytic ruminal bacterial consortiums lyophilizedReduction of the crude protein in the diet of creole broilers in a semi-intensive system author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista MVZ Córdoba

Print version ISSN 0122-0268On-line version ISSN 1909-0544

Rev.MVZ Cordoba vol.24 no.3 Córdoba Sep./Dec. 2019  Epub June 01, 2020

https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1501 

Research article

Parasitic nematodes of Pool Frog (Pelophylax lessonae) in the Volga Basin

Igor V. Chikhlyaev1 

Alexander B. Ruchin2  * 

Alexander I. Fayzulin1 

1 Institute of Ecology of the Volga River Basin, Russian Academy of Sciences, Togliatti, Russia.

2 Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park «Smolny». Saransk, Russia.


ABSTRACT

Objetive.

Present a modern review of the nematodes fauna of the pool frog Pelophylax lessonae (Camerano, 1882) from Volga basin populations on the basis of our own research and literature sources analysis.

Materials and methods.

Present work consolidates data from different helminthological works over the past 80 years, supported by our own research results. During the period from 1936 to 2016 different authors examined 1460 specimens of pool frog, using the method of full helminthological autopsy, from 13 regions of the Volga basin.

Results.

In total 9 nematodes species were recorded. Nematode Icosiella neglecta found for the first time in the studied host from the territory of Russia and Volga basin. Three species appeared to be more widespread: Oswaldocruzia filiformis, Cosmocerca ornata and Icosiella neglecta. For each helminth species the following information included: systematic position, areas of detection, localization, biology, list of definitive hosts, the level of host-specificity.

Conclusions.

Nematodes of pool frog, excluding I. neglecta, belong to the group of soil-transmitted helminthes (geohelminth) and parasitize in adult stages. Some species (O. filiformis, C. ornata, I. neglecta) are widespread in the host range. The latter two are able to reach high invasion indices and also to be the background parasites of the pool frog. It happens due to these nematode species life cycle specificity and the long-term connection of the amphibian with water.

Keywords: Aplectana; Cosmocerca; Icosiella neglecta; Oswaldocruzia filiformis (Source: CAB)

RESUMEN

Objetivo.

Presentar una revisión moderna de la fauna de nematodos de la rana esculenta Pelophylax lessonae (Camerano, 1882) de las poblaciones de la cuenca del Río Volga.

Materiales y métodos.

Este trabajo consolida los datos de diferentes trabajos helmintológicos de los últimos 80 años, respaldados por los resultados de nuestras propias investigaciones. Durante el período de 1936 a 2016 diferentes autores examinaron 1460 especímenes de rana esculenta, utilizando el método de autopsia helmintológica completa de 13 regiones de la cuenca del Río Volga.

Resultados.

En total se registraron 9 especies de nematodos. Nematodo Icosiella neglecta encontrado por primera vez en el huésped estudiado en el territorio de Rusia y la cuenca del Río Volga. Tres especies parecían estar más extendidas: Oswaldocruzia filiformis, Cosmocerca ornata e Icosiella neglecta. Para cada especie de helmintos se incluyó la siguiente información: posición sistemática, áreas de detección, localización, biología, lista de hospederos definitivos, nivel de especificidad del hospedero.

Conclusiones.

Los nematodos de la rana esculenta, excepto I. neglecta, pertenecen al grupo de helmintos transmitidos por el suelo (geohelmintos) y parasitan en estadios adultos. Algunas especies (O. filiformis, C. ornata, I. neglecta) están muy extendidas en el área de distribución del hospedador. Estos dos últimos son capaces de alcanzar altos índices de invasión y también de ser los parásitos subyacentes de la rana esculenta. Esto sucede debido a la especificidad del ciclo de vida de estas especies de nematodos y a la conexión a largo plazo del anfibio con el agua.

Palabras clave: Aplectana; Cosmocerca; Icosiella neglecta; Oswaldocruzia bialata (Fuente: CAB)

INTRODUCTION

The pool frog Pelophylax lessonae (Camerano, 1882) (Amphibia: Anura) is common in Europe from southern France in the west to Tatarstan and Bashkortostan (Russia) in the east 1,2,3,4. It is restricted to the forest zone, in which it inhabits plain broad leaved and mixed forests till the south taiga. In the forest the frog prefers shallow standing water bodies with dense vegetation: lakes, ponds, former river-beds, marshes; it occasionally occurs in the shallows of rivers and streams, in flood meadows and islands 1,5,6. Through riverine thickets and forested floodplains, this frog penetrates the forest-steppe and steppe zones; adults are able to migrate to neighboring water bodies. It is common in the anthropogenic landscapes where it inhabits temporary and drying reservoirs like: road tracks, roadside pits, ditches and quarries with water 7,8,9,10,11. The helminths fauna of the pool frog on the territory of the habitat has been studied unevenly and insufficiently. Reviews on parasites of frogs and toads for European countries clearly confirm this 12,13,14,15,16.

This paper continues a series of publications devoted to the modern characterization of the helminth fauna of certain amphibian species in the Volga basin 17,18,19,20,21. Data on the fauna of trematodes (Trematoda) of this species of amphibians from the Middle Volga region are presented in the works of Chikhlyaev et al 22,23. The aim of the study is to present a modern review of the nematodes (Nematoda) fauna of the pool frog from Volga basin populations on the basis of our own research and literature sources analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site study. The Volga basin covers an area of 1360 thousand km2, which is almost 13% of the area of Europe (Figure 1). In Russia, 41 regions belong fully or partially to this basin. The channel of the Volga and its tributaries are located in lowlands, and only in some places the river flows through elevations (for example, the Samarskaya Luka near the Zhiguli Mountains). The vast basin is characterized by a significant variety of landscapes. Forest ecosystems predominate in the northern part of the basin. At the same time, there are the mixed and coniferous forests in the northwestern part, while the forests of the taiga type with larch and spruce prevail in the northeastern part. In the middle part of the Volga basin, the forest ecosystems gradually pass into the zone of the forest-steppe landscapes, then to the south, the steppe and semi-desert ecosystems are more expressed. Beyond the southern margin of the dry steppes the flat and anhydrous Caspian semi-desert with its saline soil cover, drainage rivers, low-lying and sparse vegetation begins.

Figure 1 Location of the Volga basin. 

In the period from 1936 to 2016 different authors have examined 1460 specimens of pool frog from 13 regions of the Volga basin, among which are: Kaluga, Moscow, Ivanovo, Kostroma, Nizhny Novgorod, Tambov, Ulyanovsk and Samara regions, Republic of Mordovia, Republic of Chuvashia, Republic of Mari El, Republic of Tatarstan and Republic of Bashkortostan (Table 1). Own researches are conducted in 8 regions of Russia. In total, more than 568 specimens of P. lessonae have been studied. Studies were performed by the method of full helminthological autopsy. The collection, fixation and processing of the material were carried out according to the standard methods 24.

Table 1 Nematodes of pool frog Pelophylax lessonae in the Volga basin regions 

Notes: KL - Kaluga region (32,our data); MS - Moscow region (33); IV - Ivanovo region (34); KS - Kostroma region (26); NN - Nizhny Novgorod region (35,36,our data); TM - Tambov region (37,our data); UL - Ulyanovsk region (38); SM - Samara region (39,40,our data); RM - The Republic of Mordovia (18,41,our data); CH - The Republic of Chuvashia (our data); ME - The Republic of Mari El (our data); TT - The Republic of Tatarstan (42,our data); BS - The Republic of Bashkortostan (43).

For species determination of helminths, were used reports of Ryzhikov et al 24. To refer nematodes species to according systematic taxones, we used systems developed by Hodda 25.

RESULTS

Annotated list of pool frog nematodes species with an indication of their systematic position, areas of detection, localization, biology and geographic distribution is given below. The information on degree of specificity of parasites to hosts is also provided. For each species of nematodes, a list of their definitive hosts within Russia is indicated, corrected according to literary sources analysis 18,19,22-24.

Phylum: Nematoda Cobb, 1932

Class: Chromadorea Inglis, 1983

Order: Panagrolaimida Hodda, 2007

Family: Rhabdiasidae Railliet, 1916

Rhabdias bufonis (Schrank, 1788)

Localization: lungs.

Areas of detection: Kostroma, Nizhny Novgorod and Samara regions, the Republics of Mordovia and Tatarstan.

Description (n=2): The shape of the buccal capsule is close to cylindrical. The size of the buccal capsule, which is 10-11 μm long and 9 μm wide. The shape of the tail is slender; body length, which is 9-10 mm.

Biology: It is a soil-transmitted parasite (geohelminth). Infection of amphibians results from percutaneous penetration of invasive larvae which migrate with a blood flow in the host’s lungs on the land 26. Participation of paratenic hosts - land mollusks, oligochaetes is probable 24. Is a widely specific parasite of anurans.

Definitive hosts: different species of anurans amphibians of the genera Pelophylax, Rana, Bufo, Pelobates and Hyla, Bombina bombina (Linnaeus, 1761), Bufotes viridis (Laurenti, 1768).

Distribution: Holarctic.

Order: Rhabditida Chitwood, 1933

Family: Trichostrongylidae Leiper, 1908

Oswaldocruzia filiformis (Goeze, 1782)

Syn.: Oswaldocruzia goezei Skrjabin et Schulz, 1952

Localization: small intestine.

Areas of detection: Kaluga, Moscow, Ivanovo, Kostroma, Nizhny Novgorod, Tambov, Ulyanovsk and Samara regions, the Republics of Mordovia, Chuvashia, Mari El, Tatarstan and Bashkortostan.

Biology: Geohelminth. Infection of amphibians occurs by oral penetration of invasive larvae on the land. Experiments on percutaneous infections did not reveal actual penetration of larvae in or through the skin nor a subsequent migration through host tissues. The percutaneous route of infection is not plausible for O. filiformis27. Is a widely specific parasite of amphibians.

Definitive hosts: different species of amphibians of the genera Pelophylax, Rana, Bufo, Pelobates, Bombina and Hyla, Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896, B. viridis, Lissotriton vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758), Salamandra salamandra (Linnaeus, 1758).

Distribution: Palearctic.

Oswaldocruzia bialata (Molin, 1860)

Localization: small intestine.

Areas of detection: Kostroma region, Republic of Tatarstan.

Biology: Geohelminth 28. The development cycle is probably similar to that O. filiformis.

Definitive hosts: anurans amphibians of family Ranidae, Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758).

Distribution: Palearctic.

Order: Spirurida Railliet, 1914

Family: Cosmocercidae Travassos, 1925

Aplectana acuminata (Schrank, 1788)

Localization: intestine.

Areas of detection: Moscow, Kostroma and Nizhny Novgorod regions, the Republic of Tatarstan.

Biology: Geohelminth. Is widely specific parasite of tadpoles amphibians whom they catch very much early. Own finds of nematodes at tadpoles of green frogs testify to the water route of infection with a parasite.

Definitive hosts: amphibians of genera Pelophylax, Rana, Pelobates and Hyla, B. bombina, B. bufo, B. viridis, Triturus cristatus (Laurenti, 1768).

Distribution: Europe.

Cosmocerca ornata (Dujardin, 1845)

Localization: rectum.

Areas of detection: Kaluga, Moscow, Ivanovo, Kostroma, Nizhny Novgorod, Tambov and Samara regions, the Republics of Mordovia, Mari El and Tatarstan.

Biology: Geohelminth. Infection of amphibians occurs in water at a stage of tadpoles. However nematode larvae in intestines of tadpoles don’t develop and in process a metamorphosis of the host are eliminated 29. Possibly, development of nematodes happens only at infection of adult frogs. Is widely specific parasite of anurans amphibians.

Definitive hosts: amphibians of genera Pelophylax, Rana, Bufo, Pelobates and Hyla, B. bombina, B. viridis, L. vulgaris (?).

Distribution: Europe.

Cosmocerca commutata (Diesing, 1851)

Syn.: Cosmocercoides skrjabini (Ivanitzky, 1940)

Localization: rectum (adult specimens); musculature of throat, body cavity (larval stages).

Areas of detection: Nizhny Novgorod region and the Republic of Tatarstan.

Biology: Geohelminth. The nematode larvae, as a result of peroral penetration are localized in capsules of the oral cavity, where they develop into adults and, after the encapsulation, migrate in rectum 30. A narrow specific parasite of the B. viridis.

Definitive hosts: B. viridis. Findings from other species of amphibians (especially frogs) require confirmation.

Distribution: Palearctic.

Oxysomatium brevicaudatum (Zeder, 1800)

Syn.: Neoxysomatium brevicaudatum (Zeder, 1800)

Localization: rectum.

Areas of detection: Moscow, Kostroma and Nizhny Novgorod regions, the Republic of Tatarstan.

Biology: Geohelminth. The frequent occurrence of a nematode at terrectrial amphibians, according to us, testifies in favor of a land route of infection. Is widely specific parasite of anurans amphibians.

Definitive hosts: amphibians of genera Pelophylax, Rana and Pelobates, B. bombina, B. bufo, B. viridis, L. vulgaris (?).

Distribution: Holarctic.

Neoraillietnema praeputiale (Skrjabin, 1916)

Syn.: Aplectana praeputialis (Skrjabin, 1916)

Localization: rectum.

Area of detection: Kostroma region.

Biology: Geohelminth. Life cycle of a nematode is not studied. Is widely specific parasite of anurans.

Definitive hosts: anurans amphibians of genera Pelophylax, Rana and Hyla, B. bombina, B. bufo (?), B. viridis.

Distribution: Europe.

Family: Onchocercidae (Leiper, 1911)

Icosiella neglecta (Diesing, 1851)

Localization: muscles, subcutaneous tissue.

Areas of detection: Kaluga, Nizhny Novgorod, Tambov and Samara regions, the Republics of Mordovia, Chuvashia, Mari El and Tatarstan. First observed in the pool frog of Russia and the Volga basin.

Biology: Develops with change of hosts (biohelminth). The intermediate hosts are the Ceratopogonidae dipterans - Forcipomyia velox and Sycorax silacea. Infection with a parasite occurs at percutaneous penetration of invasive larvae through a sting of midges during feeding by blood of frogs 31. Is a specific parasite of anurans amphibians family Ranidae.

Definitive hosts: anurans amphibians of family Ranidae.

Distribution: Palearctic.

DISCUSSION

In the pool frog on the territory of Volga basin there are 9 species of nematodes from 7 genera, 4 families, 3 orders and 1 class (Table 1). Of these, 6 species are broadly specific, polyhostal parasites of anurans, one (I. neglecta) - are specific, oligohostal for the family Ranidae Rafinesque, 1814, and one (C. commutata) is a narrow specific, monohostal parasite of toads of the genus Bufotes Rafinesque, 1815. Nematode I. neglecta are indicated for the first time for the pool frog of Russia and the Volga basin. Among all nematodes, 8 species parasitize in the adult stage and use frogs as obligatory definitive hosts. And only nematode C. commutata combine different stages of development in one individual or individuals of different ages, and use amphibians as amphyxenic hosts.

The largest species diversity of nematodes was recorded in pool frogs in the Republic of Tatarstan (8 species), Nizhny Novgorod (7 species) and Kostroma (7 species) regions; lower number of species was registered in Samara (4 species), Kaluga, Moscow, Tambov (on 3 species) and Ivanovo (2 species) regions, Republic of Mordovia (4 species), Republic of Mari El (3 species) and Republic of Chuvashia (2 species); the minimum - in Ulyanovsk (1 species) region and the Republic of Bashkortostan (1 species) (Table 1). These differences depend on the nature of conditions of dwelling of amphibians in separate biotopes, their geographical location, extent of anthropogenic transformation and different volumes of selections.

The nematodes composition of the pool frog varies in the Volga basin. Of the recorded 9 species, only one was observed in all regions (100% of occurrence): it is the nematode O. filiformis. Very close to this index were C. ornata and I. neglecta, found in 10 and 8 samplings, respectively, out of 13 examined. Three more species of helminths (Rh. bufonis, O. brevicaudatum and A. acuminata) were less common in the habitat range of this host, and their findings were of a sporadic nature. The rest of the species, in particular, nematodes O. bialata, C. commutata and N. praeputiale were found locally and they were observed in 1-2 samplings.

In conclusion the fauna of helminths of the amphibians depends on their way of life, the nature of a biotope, duration of stay in water / on the land and food spectrum. Nematodes of pool frog, excluding I. neglecta, belong to the group of soil-transmitted helminthes (geohelminth) and parasitize in adult stages. Some species (O. filiformis, C. ornata, I. neglecta) are widespread in the host range. The latter two are able to reach high invasion indices and also to be the background parasites of the pool frog. It happens due to these nematode species life cycle specificity (the availability of free-floating invasive larval stages) and the long-term connection of the amphibian with water.

REFERENCES

1. Cogalniceanu D, Szekely P, Samoila C, Iosif R, Tudor M, Plaiasu R, Stanescu F, Rozylowicz L. Diversity and distribution of amphibians in Romania. Zookeys. 2013; 296:35-57. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.296.4872Links ]

2. Zeisset I, Hoogesteger T. A reassessment of the biogeographic range of northern clade pool frogs (Pelophylax lessonae). Herpetological J. 2018; 28(2):63-72. https://www.thebhs.org/publications/the-herpetological-journal/volume-28-number-2-april-2018/1801-02-a-reassessment-of-the-biogeographic-range-of-northern-clade-pool-frogs-i-pelophylax-lessonae-iLinks ]

3. Dubey S, Leuenberger J, Perrin N. Multiple origins of invasive and ‘native’ water frogs (Pelophylax spp.) in Switzerland. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2014; 112(3):442-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12283Links ]

4. Ratnikov VY, Blain HA. Holocene amphibians and reptiles from Voroncha (Belarus): Comparative osteology, paleopathology and paleobiogeography. Historical Biology. 2018; 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2018.1506777Links ]

5. Hoogesteger T, Rahkonen J, Karhilahti A. Pool frog (Pelophylax lessonae) Camerano 1882 (Anura, Ranidae), an addition to the Finnish amphibian fauna. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica. 2013; 89:25-31. URL Available in: https://journal.fi/msff/article/view/40883/10203Links ]

6. Bashinskiy IV, Osipov VV. Beavers in Russian forest-steppe - characteristics of ponds and their impact on fishes and amphibians. Russian J Theriology. 2016; 15(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusjtheriol.15.1.06Links ]

7. Hoffmann A, Plotner J, Pruvost NBM, Christiansen DG, Rothlisberger S, Choleva L, Mikulicek P, Cogalniceanu D, Sas-Kovacs I, Shabanov D, Morozov-Leonov S, Reyer HU. Genetic diversity and distribution patterns of diploid and polyploid hybrid water frog populations (Pelophylax esculentus complex) across Europe. Molecular Ecology. 2015; 24(17):4371-4391. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13325Links ]

8. Fayzulin AI, Zamaletdinov RI, Litvinchuk SN, Rosanov JM, Borkin LJ, Ermakov OA, et al. Species composition and distributional peculiarities of green frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex) in Protected Areas of the Middle Volga Region (Russia). Nature Conservation Research. 2018; 3(Suppl. 1):1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2018.056Links ]

9. Lukanov SP, Tzankov ND, Naumov BY. First documented records of Pelophylax lessonae (Camerano, 1882) (Amphibia: Ranidae) from Bulgaria. Acta Zool Bulgarica. 2017; 69(4):483-488. http://www.acta-zoologica-bulgarica.eu/downloads/acta-zoologica-bulgarica/2017/69-4-483-488.pdfLinks ]

10. Canestrelli D, Nascetti G. Phylogeography of the pool frog Rana (Pelophylax) lessonae in the Italian peninsula and Sicily: multiple refugia, glacial expansions and nuclear-mitochondrial discordance. Journal of Biogeography. 2008; 35 (10):1923-1936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01946.xLinks ]

11. Korzikov VA, Aleksanov VV. On some factors driving the presence of amphibians in water bodies of the Upper Oka Basin (Central Russia). Nature Conservation Research . 2018; 3(Suppl. 1):110-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2018.059Links ]

12. Svitin R, Kuzmin Y. Oswaldocruzia duboisi (Nematoda, Molineidae): morphology, hosts and distribution in Ukraine. Vestnik Zoologii. 2012; 46(3): e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10058-012-0017-xLinks ]

13. Okulewicz A, Hildebrand J, Łysowski R, Buńkowska K, Perec-Matysiak A. Helminth communities of green and brown frogs from Poland (Lower Silesia Region). J Herpetology. 2014; 48(1):34-37. https://doi.org/10.1670/12-108Links ]

14. Vojtková L, Roca V. Parasites of the frogs and toads in Europe. Part II: Trematoda. Revista Española de Herpetología. 1994; 8:7-18. [ Links ]

15. Vojtková L, Roca V. Parasites of the frogs and toads in Europe. Part III: Nematoda, Cestoda, Acanthocephala, Hirudinea, Crustacea and Insecta. Revista Española de Herpetología . 1996; 10:13-27. URL Available in: https://www.herpetologica.es/publicaciones/revista-espanola-de-herpetologia/69-revista-espanola-de-herpetologia-10-1996Links ]

16. Popiołek M, Rozenblut-Kościsty B, Kot M, Nosal W, Ogielska M. Endoparasitic helminths of water frog complex in Poland: do differences exist between the parental species Pelophylax ridibundus and Pelophylax lessonae, and their natural hybrid Pelophylax esculentus? Helminthologia. 2011; 48(2):108-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-011-0020-8Links ]

17. Ruchin AB, Chikhlyaev IV, Lukijanov SV. Analysis of helminthofauna of Common spaedfoot Pelobates fuscus (Laurenti, 1768) and Moor frog Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842 (Amphibia: Anura) at their joint habitation. Parazitologiia. 2009; 43(3):240-247. URL Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19637773Links ]

18. Ruchin AB, Kirillov AA, Chikhlyaev IV, Kirillova NY. Parasitic Worms of Land Vertebrates in Mordovia Reserve (Annotated List of Species). Moscow, Russia. 2016. URL Available in: https://zapoved-mordovia.ru/uploads/images/nauchnaia-rabota/izdania-zapovednika/124_Parazit_worms_MGPZ_2016.pdfLinks ]

19. Chikhlyaev IV, Ruchin AB. The helminth fauna study of European common brown frog (Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758) in the Volga basin. Acta Parasitol. 2014; 59(3):459-471. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0268-5Links ]

20. Chikhlyaev IV, Ruchin AB, Fayzulin AI. The helminth fauna study of European common toad in the Volga basin. Nat Environ and Pollut Technol. 2016; 15(3):1103-1109. http://www.neptjournal.com/upload-images/NL-57-51-(49)D-574.pdfLinks ]

21. Reshetnikov AN, Sokolov SG, Chikhlyaev IV, Fayzulin AI, Kirillov AA, Kuzovenko AE, et al. Direct and indirect interactions between an invasive alien fish (Perccottus glenii) and two native semi-aquatic snakes. Copeia. 2013; 1:103-110. https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-12-007Links ]

22. Chikhlyaev IV, Kirillov AA, Kirillova NY. Trematodes (Trematoda) of amphibians (Amphibia) of the Middle Volga region. 1. Orders Fasciolida, Hemiurida, Paramphistomida and Strigeida. Parazitol. 2012; 46(3):171-192. URL Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23082495Links ]

23. Chikhlyaev IV, Kirillov AA, Kirillova NY. Trematodes (Trematoda) of amphibians (Amphibia) of the Middle Volga region. 2. Order Plagiorchiida. Parazitol. 2012; 46(4):290-313. URL Available in: https://www.zin.ru/journals/parazitologiya/content/2012/prz_2012_4_6_Chikhlyaev.pdfLinks ]

24. Ryzhikov KM, Sharpilov VP, Shevchenko NN. Helminths of Amphibian Fauna of the USSR. Nauka: Moscow, USSR; 1980. URL Available in: http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/elcat/new/detail.php3?doc_id=1086877Links ]

25. Hodda M. Phylum Nematoda Cobb 1932. Animal Biodiversity: an Outline of Higher-Level Classification and Survey of Taxonomic Richness. Zootaxa. 2011; 3148: 63-95. URL Available in: https://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/f/zt03148p095.pdfLinks ]

26. Schaake M. Infectionsmodus und Infectionsweg der Rhabdias bufonis Schrank (Angiostomum nigrovenosum) und die Metamorphose des Genitalapparaten der Hermafroditischen Generation. Z. Parasitenk. 1931. 3(4):517-648. URL Available in: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02146549Links ]

27. Hendrikx WML. Observations on the routes of infection of Oswaldocruzia filiformis (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) in amphibian. Z Parasitenkd. 1983; 69: 119-126. URL Available in: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00934016Links ]

28. Durette-Desset MC, Batcharov A, Ben Slimane B, Chabaud AG. Some Oswaldocruzia (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) parasites of Amphibia in Bulgaria. Redescription of Oswaldocruzia bialata (Molin, 1860). Helminthologia. 1993; 30:99-104. [ Links ]

29. Kirillova NY, Kirillov AA. Role of the Marsh frog tadpoles in the life cycle of Cosmocerca ornata (Nematoda: Cosmocercidae). Parasitology. 2015; 49(1):49-60. URL Available in: http://www.zin.ru/journals/parazitologiya/content/2015/prz_2015_1_5_Kirillova.pdfLinks ]

30. Yumagulova GR. To the study of nematode Cosmocercoides skrjabini (Ivanitzky, 1940). Results of Biological Research of the Bashkir State University for 1998. Ufa: Russia; 1999. [ Links ]

31. Desportes C. Forcipomyia velox Winn et Sycorax silacea Curtis, vecteurs d’Icosiella neglecta (Diesing, 1850) filaire commune de la grenouille verte. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee. 1942-1943; 19:53-68. URL Available in: https://www.parasite-journal.org/articles/parasite/pdf/1942/01/parasite1942-1943191p53.pdfLinks ]

32. Chikhlyaev IV, Korzikov VA, Fayzulin AI. Materials for the helminth fauna of the Pool frog Pelophylax lessonae and the Common toad Bufo bufo (Amphibia, Anura) in Kaluga region. Bulletin of Samara Sci. Center of the RAS. 2016; 5(2):377-381. URL Available in: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/materialy-k-gelmintofaune-prudovoy-lyagushki-pelophylax-lessonae-i-seroy-zhaby-bufo-bufo-amphibia-anura-v-kaluzhskoy-oblastiLinks ]

33. Kotova EN. Parasitic worms of fish and amphibians of the Klyazma river in the area of the Bolshevo Biological Station. Notes of the Bolshevo Biol Station. 1936; 9:139-140. [ Links ]

34. Kirillova YA, Egorov SV. The helminth fauna of anurans amphibians of the Ivanovo region. Editor: Bessonov, A.S. Theory and Practice to Combat Parasitic Diseases (Zoonoses). Issue 3. Moscow; Russia: 2002. [ Links ]

35. Borisova VI. Helminths of amphibians geographical distribution study. Parazitol. 1988; 22(6):471-475. URL Available in: https://www.zin.ru/journals/parazitologiya/content/1988/prz_1988_6_4_Borisova.pdfLinks ]

36. Nosova KF. Helminth fauna of the Pool frog in Nizhny Novgorod region. Publishing House of NSPI; Nizhny Novgorod, USSR: 1993. [ Links ]

37. Kolodina AS, Pyatova MV, Ravkovskaya EA, Lada GA. To the question of nutrition and helminths of the Pool frog (Pelophylax lessonae) in the conditions of Tambov region. Bulletin of Tambov Univ. 2016; 21(5):1791-1796. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20310/1810-0198-2016-21-5-1791-1796Links ]

38. Indiryakova TA, Romanova EM, Matveeva EA. Helminth fauna species diversity of amphibians in the Ulyanovsk region. Proceedings of OGAU. 2008; 1(17):172-176. URL Available in: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vidovoe-raznoobrazie-gelmintofauny-amfibiy-na-territorii-ulyanovskoy-oblastiLinks ]

39. Chikhlyaev IV. On the helminths of the Pool frog Rana lessonae Camerano, 1882 in Samara city. Mordovia State Bulletin. 2009; 1: 96-98. URL Available in: http://vestnik.mrsu.ru/content/pdf/09-1.pdfLinks ]

40. Chikhlyaev IV. Materials on the helminth fauna of the Pool frog Pelophylax lessonae (Camerano, 1882) in Zhiguli Nature Reserve. Samarskaya Luka: Problems of Regional and Global Ecol. 2017; 26(4):244-248. URL Available in: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/materialy-k-gelmintofaune-prudovoy-lyagushki-pelophylaxlessonae-camerano-1882-v-zhigulevskom-zapovednikeLinks ]

41. Chikhlyaev IV, Ruchin AB, Fayzulin AI. Helminths of anurans amphibians (Anura, Amphibia) of the Mordovia Reserve. Proceedings of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve. 2015; 14:376-388. URL Available in: http://zapoved-mordovia.ru/biblio/Trudy_Mordovskogo_zapovednika_Vyp_14_2015.pdfLinks ]

42. Smirnova MI, Gorshkov PK, Sizova VG. Helminth fauna of anurans amphibians in Tatarstan Republic. Institute of Biology of Academy of Sciences of the USSR; Kazan, USSR: 1987. [ Links ]

43. Bayanov MG. Helminths of amphibians in Bashkortostan. Editor: Bayanov M.G. Problems of Animal Ecology of Southern Ural. Issue. 5. Publishing House Bashkir University: Ufa, USSR; 1992.t [ Links ]

How to cite (Vancouver) Chikhlyaev VI, Ruchin AB, Fayzulin AI. Parasitic nematodes of Pool Frog (Pelophylax lessonae) in the Volga Basin. Rev MVZ Cordoba. 2019; 24(3):7314-7321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1501

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest with publication of this manuscript.

Received: February 2019; Accepted: July 2019; Published: August 2019

* Correspondence: ruchin.alexander@gmail.com

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons