SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 issue1LOW - MEDIUM ENTHALPY GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT IN DEEP RESERVOIRS OF THE LLANOS BASIN -COLOMBIA author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro

Print version ISSN 0122-5383On-line version ISSN 2382-4581

C.T.F Cienc. Tecnol. Futuro vol.12 no.1 Bucaramanga Jan./June 2022  Epub Dec 13, 2022

https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.403 

Original articles

BIODEGRADATION AND TOXICITY OF SCLEROGLUCAN FOR ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY

BIODEGRADACIÓN Y TOXICIDAD DEL ESCLEROGLUCANO PARA RECOBRO MEJORADO DE PETRÓLEO

Zully-Patricia Rodríguez-Mateus1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-6119

Rosa-Carolina Angarita1 

Jhorman-Alexis Niño-Gómez2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-6904

Laura-Milena Corredor2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-1460

Sebastián Llanos Gallo3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-7043

Henderson Quintero1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-442X

Rubén-Hernán Castro-García4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-4221

1 Desarrollo en tecnologías de Hidrocarburos DTH SAS, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

2 Ecopetrol S.A. - Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo (ICP), Vía Piedecuesta Km.7, Piedecuesta, Santander-Colombia

3 Tecnólogos e Ingenieros de la Industria del Petróleo TIP, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

4 Meridian Consulting, Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia


ABSTRACT

Polymer flooding consists of injecting polymer-augmented water into the reservoir to control the water-oil mobility ratio, resulting in an increase in the volumetric sweep efficiency compared to water flooding. Synthetic polymers (polyacrylamides) and biopolymers (scleroglucan, xanthan gum, schizophyllan) are the two families of polymers usually evaluated for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Scleroglucan (SG) is resistant to electrolytes, hydrolysis, pH (3-10) and temperature (30-100°C) and has remarkable rheological properties, but it is quite susceptible to microbiological degradation. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the biodegradation of SG in the injection and production processes and its aquatic toxicity. The anaerobic biodegradation of the SG solutions was determined through the viscosity changes of the solutions, while the aerobic biodegradation was calculated with the changes in the SG concentration. It was observed that the viscosity reduction of the SG solution was 30% and the SG concentration decreased from 100 ppm to 52 ppm because bacteria can metabolize the biopolymer. Daphnia pulex, Scenedesmus acutus and Oreochromis sp. were the organisms used in the ecotoxicological assays of the SG solutions. The acute ecotoxicological bioassays showed that there was no evidence of acute deleterious effects of SG on any of the three organisms. From the chronic ecotoxicological bioassays, it was concluded that there was no effect of SG on the mortality of Daphnia pulex, regardless of the tested SG concentration.

KEYWORDS: Biodegradation; Toxicity; Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR); Biopolymer; Scleroglucan

RESUMEN

La inyección de polímeros en el yacimiento es usada para incrementar la viscosidad del agua para controlar la relación de movilidad agua-petróleo, lo que resulta en un aumento en la eficiencia de barrido volumétrico, en comparación con el proceso de inyección de agua. Los polímeros sintéticos (poliacrilamidas) y biopolímeros (escleroglucano, goma xantana, esquizofilano) son las dos familias de polímeros más usadas para la recuperación mejorada de petróleo (EOR).

El escleroglucano (SG) es resistente a electrolitos, hidrólisis, pH (3- 10) y temperatura (30-100°C) y tiene excelentes propiedades reológicas, pero es susceptible a la degradación microbiana. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue evaluar la biodegradación de SG durante su inyección y producción y su toxicidad acuática. La biodegradación anaeróbica de las soluciones SG se determinó a través de los cambios de viscosidad de las soluciones, mientras que la biodegradación aeróbica fue calculada por los cambios en la concentración de SG. Se observó que la reducción de la viscosidad de la solución SG fue del 30% y que la concentración de SG disminuyó de 100 a 52 ppm, porque las bacterias pueden metabolizar el biopolímero. Daphnia pulex, Scenedesmus acutus y Oreochromis sp. fueron los organismos utilizados en los ensayos ecotoxicológicos de las soluciones SG. Los bioensayos ecotoxicológicos agudos mostraron que no hay evidencia de efectos nocivos agudos del SG en ninguno de los tres organismos. A partir de los bioensayos ecotoxicológicos crónicos se concluyó que no hay efecto del SG en la mortalidad de Daphnia pulex, a las concentraciones de SG evaluadas.

PALABRAS CLAVE: Biodegradación; Toxicidad; Recuperación Mejorada de Petróleo (EOR); Biopolímero; Escleroglucano

1. INTRODUCTION

Polymer flooding results from adding a high-molecular-weight water-soluble polymer to waterfloods to increase oil recovery by decreasing the water/oil mobility ratio [1]. Partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) is the most widely used synthetic polymer for EOR purposes, but it is susceptible to high salinity, temperature, and shear forces which leads to notable loss of its thickening power, affecting adversely its performance in EOR (1). Scleroglucan (SG) is considered the best environmentally-friendly substitution for polyacrylamides because of their high tolerance to harsh conditions [2].

The limitation of the use of SG for EOR processes is its susceptibility to microbial degradation. Polymer biodegradation depends on the chemical and physical properties of the polymer. These properties are key because they affect the biodegradation efficiency of microorganisms. The enzymes responsible for polymer degradation are generally extracellular depolymerase and intracellular depolymerase. These enzymes are involved in the degradation of complex polymers to simple units such as monomers and dimers. The degradation of polymers under anaerobic conditions produces organic acids, H2O and gases (CO2 and CH4) [3]. Under aerobic conditions, the biodegradation of the polymer forms CO2 and H2O in addition to the cellular biomass of the microorganisms. Deep subsurface petroleum reservoir ecosystems harbor a high diversity of microorganisms, which can use SG as a carbon source, promoting their proliferation and biocorrosion of oil infrastructures [4,5]. The microbial degradation of SG was investigated by Kozlowicz et al. (2020 )[6]. Their results showed that the risk of anaerobic biodegradation of SG decreases significantly at temperatures above 60°C and salinities greater than 7 wt%. They also recommended that antimicrobial controls must be targeted to the near-wellbore zone.

The possibility of SG reaching natural water systems downstream of its application is another concern because aquatic ecosystems are very prone to contamination [7,8]. Aquatic toxicity is determined with organisms representing the three trophic levels: Algae or plants (representing primary producers), invertebrates (e.g., crustaceans, representing primary consumers/secondary producers), and vertebrates (usually fish, representing secondary consumers). There are acute and chronic endpoints in aquatic toxicity. Acute toxicity tests (short-term exposure tests) assess concentrations that produce 50% death in a given group of individuals [9]. The results from these tests are expressed by the Lethal Concentration (LC50) [10]. Chronic toxicity is about longer-term exposure and includes effects on the hatching, growth, and survival of the individuals. This test is used to determine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration) values or LOEC (Lowest Observed Effect Concentration) [9].

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no literature reports on the anaerobic biodegradation tests for SG, and studies of the acute and chronic toxicity of SG on aquatic organisms. For this reason, this study aimed to evaluate the biodegradation of SG under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, the effect of SG on the hatching and survival rate of Daphnia pulex and its lethal concentration (LC50) in Daphnia pulex, Scenedesmus acutus and Oreochromis sp.

2. METHODOLOGY

MATERIALS

The biopolymer solutions were prepared with commercial SG (MW≈4-5 MDa), injection brine (RW) from a Colombian field (pH = 8.17 and conductivity = 2480 µS/cm) and a synthetic brine (SB). The synthetic brine was prepared with sodium chloride (NaCl, 99.5% pure, Merck Millipore, USA), potassium chloride (KCl, 99.5% pure, Merck Millipore, USA), magnesium chloride (MgCl2.6H2O, 99% pure, Merck Millipore, USA), and calcium chloride (CaCl2.2H2O, 99% pure, Merck Millipore, USA). Sodium acetate (C2H3NaO2, 99% pure, Merck Millipore, USA) was used as a positive control in the biodegradability tests. The concentration of SG was determined by using phenol (C6H6O, 99.5% pure, Merck Millipore, USA) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, >95% pure, Merck Millipore, USA).

The acute ecotoxicological bioassays of SG were carried out on the Scenedesmus acutus organisms (Microalgae-primary producer), Daphnia pulex (Cladocera-primary consumer) and Oreochromis sp. (fish-secondary consumer). The chronic bioassays were performed with Daphnia pulex.

METHODS

POLYMER SOLUTION PREPARATION

The 2000 ppm stock SG solutions were prepared by dissolving the SG powder into the aqueous phase under mechanical stirring (500 rpm). Then, the solutions were stirred at 800 rpm and heated at 40°C for 10 min. Finally, the solutions were homogenized for 20 min by using a high-performance immersion blender (IKA™ T 25 Digital Ultra-Turrax) [11]. The aqueous phases used were synthetic brine (SB), injection brine (RW) or sterile injection brine (RSW) filtered through a 0.45 µm MCE membrane filter (Merck Millipore, USA). A synthetic brine (SB) containing 0.829 g/L sodium chloride (NaCl, 99.5% pure, Merck Millipore, USA), 0.035 g/L potassium chloride (KCl, 99.5% pure, Merck Millipore, USA), 0.069 g/L magnesium chloride (MgCl2.6H2O, 99% pure, Merck Millipore, USA), and 0.331 g/L calcium chloride (CaCl2.2H2O, 99% pure, Merck Millipore, USA). To perform the tests, the stock solutions were diluted until reaching a concentration of 930 ppm.

BIODEGRADATION TESTS

ANAEROBIC BIODEGRADATION OF SCLEROGLUCAN

The solutions and brines presented in Table 1 were used to determine if SG undergoes biological degradation under anaerobic conditions.

Table 1 Solutions and brines used for the anaerobic degradation tests of SG. 

To perform the tests, the solutions were flushed with sterile nitrogen until the concentration of the dissolved oxygen was ~ 0 mg/L. Subsequently, aliquots of 100 mL of each SG solution were contained in 150 mL glass bottles with plastic caps fitted with butyl rubber septum. The samples were flushed again with nitrogen to ensure an oxygen-free system (Figure 1). All samples were assayed in duplicate. A concentration of 100 ppm of a commercial glutaraldehyde-based biocide (B) was used for these tests.

Figure 1 Methodology used for the anaerobic biodegradation tests. 

The viscosities of the SG solutions were measured in a DV2T Viscosimeter (Brookfield Ametek, USA) at 30°C and 7.3s-1. The uncertainty of the reported value remained between ±1 to 5%.

The initial microbial load of the RW was 1.0E+03 total anaerobic bacteria/mL. The total anaerobic bacteria count was obtained with the serial dilution technique in thioglycollate medium [12]. The incubation process was carried out for 30 days at 60 °C and 100 rpm.

AEROBIC BIODEGRADATION OF SCLEROGLUCAN

Figure 2 shows the methodology used to determine the aerobic degradation of SG by microbial growth. The tests were performed with 930 ppm SG solutions prepared in RW and RSW, which were sheared with an Ultra-turrax IKA T50 (Ika laboratory equipment, Germany). The sheared samples were diluted to obtain solutions of 100 ppm and 200 ppm (considering that 10.8% and 21.5% of the injected polymer concentration remains in the production water) (9,11). After that, 200 mL of these solutions were contained in Pyrex® baffled Erlenmeyer flasks. The initial concentration of total aerobic bacteria was 7.4E + 04 CFU/mL. The bacteria count was obtained as described by Herigstad et al. (2001) [13]. The samples were incubated for 15 days at 30°C and 150 rpm. The concentration of SG was determined through the phenol-sulfuric acid method using an EPOCH microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments Inc., USA). For this procedure, 1 mL of the phenol reagent solution (5 g of phenol in 100 g of distilled water) is added to 1 g of SG solution. Then, 6 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid are added to the solution. This sample is allowed to stand for 10 minutes at room temperature. After that, the warm sample is shaken and placed in a water bath at 25 °C for 15 minutes. The absorbance is measured within 30 seconds at 485 nm with the instrument set at zero absorbance with the reagent blank [14].

Figure 2 Methodology used in the aerobic biodegradation tests. 

BIODEGRADABILITY TEST OF SCLEROGLUCAN

The biodegradation of SG was evaluated according to the OECD 301 test guideline (1992) [15] by measuring the CO2 production with a WTW respirometric OxiTop® IS (Xylem Analytics, Germany). The tests were carried out by adding 100 ppm of SG to a mineral solution containing 21.74 g/L K2HPO4, 8.50 g/L KH2PO4, 1.70 g/L NH4Cl, 44.60 g/L Na2HPO4 ∙ 12H2O, 22.5 g/L MgSO4∙7 H2O, 0.25 g/L FeCl3∙6 H2O, and 27.5 g/L CaCl2 [15]. The pH value of all solutions was adjusted to 7. For the control of endogenous respiration, the oxygen uptake rate was measured by using the inoculum and a mineral medium. The sludge from the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of the ICP was used as the inoculum. The samples were incubated for 28 days at 20°C ± 1. Sodium acetate served as a positive control, and to verify the performance of the inoculum. According to the OECD guidelines (OECD 301), the sodium acetate must exhibit dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal >70% in 28 days, otherwise, the test should be repeated using an inoculum from a different source [15].

Figure 3 Organisms used in the bioassays. 

At the end of the tests, the percentage biodegradation of SG at each time was compared to that obtained for the sodium acetate [16]. This percentage was calculated by the following equation:

Where Ct is the mean concentration of DOC in the inoculated culture medium containing test substance at time t (mg DOC/l), Co is the mean starting concentration of DOC in the inoculated culture medium containing the test substance (mg DOC/l), Cbl(o) is the mean starting concentration of DOC in blank inoculated mineral medium (mgDOC/l), and Cbl(t) is the mean concentration of DOC blank inoculated mineral medium at time t (mgDOC/l).

TOXICITY TESTS

TEST ORGANISMS

Daphnia pulex, Scenedesmus acutus and Oreochromis sp. were the organisms used in the ecotoxicological assays of the SG solutions [17-19]. The SG stock solution was prepared in RW at 1000 ppm. Then, the stock solution was diluted with the appropriate amount of RW to obtain five samples with different concentrations of SG (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5% and 6.25% v/v). The Scenedesmus acutus and Daphnia pulex organisms were obtained from a stock culture available at the biotechnology laboratory at ICP, while the Oreochromis sp. were bought from a local supplier. Before the tests, the Oreochromis sp. organisms were acclimated to pure water for 9 days, according to the OECD 203 test guideline [18,20].

The bioassay data for inhibition of the Scenedesmus acutus (algae) was used to determine the toxic effects of the samples on primary producers. The samples required for these tests were prepared in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, containing 50 mL of the study solution and 5 mL of bristol culture medium [21]. First, the algal density in each sample was determined using a Neubauer chamber. Then, a standard volume of inoculum was added to each flask to obtain an initial concentration of 5.0E + 03 cells/mL. Each sample was tested in triplicate. The samples were incubated in a chamber with controlled temperature (24 ± 2°C), light (6,000-7,000 lux), and constant shaking (100-150 rpm). The cells density in each flask was determined at 24, 48 and 72h.

The acute toxicity tests with Daphnia pulex were used to determine the toxic effects of the study samples on aquatic invertebrates. This bioassay was conducted in an environmental cabinet at constant temperature (22 ± 1°C), moderate light intensity (2000-6000 lux) and 16/8h light/dark regime. The bioassays were carried out in 50 mL glass beakers, containing 30 mL of the studied solutions. For the experiments, five neonates of Daphnia pulex were introduced into each beaker. Four replicates of each sample were prepared. The living organisms of Daphnia pulex were determined at 24 and 48h. Control samples containing 20 individuals were divided into 4 groups and kept in dilution water. After 48-hour incubation, the number of live organisms was registered and used to obtain the lethal dose 50 (LD50).

The acute toxicity tests with Oreochromis sp. were used to determine the toxic effects of the study samples on aquatic vertebrates. The tests were carried out in an air-conditioned room at constant temperature (20±3°C), moderate light intensity (2000-6000 lux) and 16/8h light/dark regime. The bioassays were carried out in 3L fishbowls, containing 2L of the studied solutions. For the tests, five fingerlings of Oreochromis sp. were introduced in each container with a hand net. Two replicates were prepared for each SG concentration. The living organisms of Oreochromis sp. were determined at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Injection (RW) and potable water were used as positive and negative control samples, respectively.

The effect of SG solutions on the reproductive output of Daphnia pulex was evaluated through chronic toxicity bioassays. For this purpose, young females of Daphnia pulex were exposed for 21 days to different concentrations of SG. At least, 10 organisms were added to each sample and the water was changed every 72h. The tests were carried out in an environmental cabinet at constant temperature (22 ±1°C), moderate light intensity (1000 - 4000 lux) and 16/8h light/dark regime. During the test, the total number of live offspring produced by each parental organism was determined.

The toxicological classification of the samples was based on the treaty established by the European Economic Community (EEC), which determines the criteria for assessing risks to the environment and human health associated with hazardous substances (Directive 67/548/ EEC). The risks classification is shown in Table 2 [22].

Table 2 Criteria Rules for Human Health and Environment Risk Assessments (Directive 67/548/EEC). 

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The results of the acute toxicological tests were analyzed using the Probit program v2.5 [23]. The lethal concentration (LC50) was calculated following the USEPA guidelines (2002) [24]. The anaerobic biodegradation of the SG solutions was determined through the viscosity changes of the solutions, while the aerobic biodegradation was calculated with the changes in the SG concentration. The biodegradability tests were validated since the deviation of the measured values of the biological replicas was less than 20%.

One-way Anova was used in the chronic toxicological tests with Daphnia pulex to determine if there were significant differences (p>0.05) in the reproduction rate between the negative and positive controls and the SG solutions. Tukey's test was performed to confirm the statistical significance of the data [25].

For the anaerobic and aerobic tests, one-way Anova was used to determine the statistical significance (p>0.05) of the changes in the viscosity and the concentration of SG in the solutions, respectively. Subsequently. Tukey´s test was performed.

3. RESULTS

ANAEROBIC BIODEGRADATION OF SCLEROGLUCAN.

Figure 4 shows the viscosity changes of the SG solutions as a function of time. The p-value of the abiotic controls in sterile water (RSW/SG) and synthetic brine (SB/SG) showed that there were no significant differences in the viscosity changes of the SG solutions after 5 weeks (p = 0.345 and 0.242, respectively). This result was attributed to the non-ionic nature of SG, which made it salt-resistant [26].In contrast, the viscosity reduction of the biotic control (RW/SG) was 92% (from 49.5 to 3.9 cP, p=0.001), suggesting that the bacteria use SG as a substrate. However, the viscosity reduction of biotic control with the biocide (RW/SG/B) was 34% (from 49 to 32.3 cP).

Figure 4 Viscosity as a function of time of the SG solutions in injection water with (RW/B) and without biocide (RW), sterilized injection water (RSW), and synthetic brine (SB) at 7.3 s-1 and 30°C. 

The anaerobic bacterial count in the RW/SG solution increased from 1.0E +02 to 1.0E+03 bacteria/mL at week 5 (Table 3). The bacterial count of the RW/SG/B solution at time 0 was <10 bacteria/mL, but from week 3 an increase to 1.0E+01 bacteria /mL was observed. It indicates that the biocide was not 100% effective. The initial bacterial count of RW brine was 1.0E+02 bacteria/mL and decreased to <10 bacteria/mL in week 5, due to the lack of carbon sources that enable the bacterial growth. In the abiotic controls with sterile water (RSW/ SG) and synthetic brine (SB/SG), the initial bacterial count was <10 bacteria/mL.

The bacterial growth and the decrease in viscosity of the SG solutions were attributed to the fact that bacteria can use the biopolymer as a carbon source. It has been reported in the literature that the metabolism of glucans occurs because the glucanase enzymes produce by bacteria break βdown biopolymers. For SG, the glucanase enzymes break down the β -d-(1-3)-glucopyranosyl chain [27,28] and their link with the -d-(1-6)-glucopyranosyl groups, depolymerizing SG.

Table 3 Total growth of the anaerobic bacteria (bacteria/mL) after five weeks. 

AEROBIC BIODEGRADATION OF SCLEROGLUCAN.

Figure 5 shows the change in concentration of 100 and 200 ppm SG sheared solutions prepared in RW and RSW. For abiotic controls, there were no significant changes in SG concentration (7% and 5% for RSW / SG solutions of 100 ppm (p = 0.511) and 200 ppm (p = 0.733), respectively). However, in the presence of bacteria, the SG concentration of the 100 ppm and 200 ppm RW / SG solutions was reduced by 48% (p = <0.001) and 27% (p = <0.029), respectively. Additionally, the aerobic bacteria count increased in SG solutions prepared in RW and decreased in RW brine after 15 days (Figure 6). As mentioned before, the decrease in the concentration of SG in solution is attributed to the fact that this biopolymer can be used as a substrate for the metabolism of microorganisms [29].

Figure 5 SG concentration of the 100 and 200 ppm SG solutions prepared in injection water (RW) and sterilized injection water (RSW) as a function of time. 

Figure 6 Total aerobic bacteria count (CFU/mL) of RW and 100 and 200 ppm SG solutions prepared in injection water (RW) and sterilized injection water (RSW) as a function of time. 

BIODEGRADATION OF SCLEROGLUCAN.

Figure 7 shows the biodegradation of SG and sodium acetate as a function of time. The sigmoid behavior of the data and the biodegradation of the sodium acetate (~100%) confirmed the validity of the tests [30]. Additionally, the deviation of the measured values of the biological replicas was less than 20%. The biodegradation of SG was 75.8% after 23 days. According to the OECD 301 test guideline (1992), SG can be classified as a biodegradable polymer.

Figure 7 Degradation of SG and the sodium acetate as a function of time. 

RESULTS OF THE TOXICITY ASSESSMENT

ACUTE TOXICITY TESTS

The result of the toxicity test and the physicochemical parameters of the RW/SG solution are presented in Table 4. The method validation was carried out according to the OECD 201 test guideline (2011) (19). For this, it was determined that the coefficient of variation between replicas was less than 35% and the biomass of Scenedesmus acutus. increased by 16% in the control bioassays after 72h.

Table 4 Physicochemical properties and toxicity classification of the RW/SG solution. 

According to the OECD guidelines established for this test (OECD 202, 2004 [26] and OECD 203, 2019), the sample was classified as not harmful to the environment. However, the toxicity test showed that SG could have deleterious effects on Scenedesmus acutus. population based on the LC50 values (Table 4). The mean survival percentage of Daphnia pulex and Oreochromis sp. was above 90%. Therefore, the RW/SG sample does not show acute toxicity for both types of organisms.

The chronic bioassay with Daphnia pulex in the RW/SG was performed to evaluate the effect of sublethal concentrations of SG on the survival and reproduction of the cladoceran. It was observed that the survival of the Daphnia pulex was not significantly affected by SG (Figure 8).

Regarding the reproduction of Daphnia pulex, the number of neonates was considerably lower at higher SG concentrations (Figure 8). The statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences (p=0.007) between the SG samples and the negative control. This difference may be related to the high conductivity of the RW (2500 μs/ cm), which affects the metabolism of the Daphnia pulex. In contrast, there were no significant differences (p=0.16) between the SG solutions and the positive control (RW).

Figure 8 Survival of Daphnia pulex as a function of the SG concentration. 

CONCLUSIONS

In the biodegradation tests, it was observed that the bacteria grew in the RW/SG, leading to the reduction of the SG concentration and the lost viscosity of the solutions because bacteria use the biopolymer as an energy and carbon source. Additionally, it was found that the biocide did not mitigate the bacterial growth in the RW/SG/B solution. The biodegradation of SG was 75.8% after 23 days. The acute ecotoxicological bioassays of the RW/SG solution showed that there was no evidence of acute deleterious effects of SG on the Scenedesmus acutus, Daphnia pulex and Oreochromis sp. microorganisms, according to the OECD (201, 202, 203) guidelines established for these tests. Therefore, the sample was classified as not harmful to the environment. It was concluded from the chronic ecotoxicological bioassays that there was no effect of SG on the mortality of Daphnia pulex, regardless of the tested SG concentrations. The proposed experimental protocol was validated through the tests performed in this study. This protocol can be applied to evaluate the biodegradation and toxicity of other natural and synthetic polymers.

REFERENCES

[1]. Green DW, Willhite GP., (1998). Enhanced Oil Recovery. Richardson, TX: SPE. p. 1-554. [ Links ]

[2]. Abidin AZ, Puspasari T, Nugroho WA. (2012). Polymers for Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology, Procedia Chem, 4, 11-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.002Links ]

[3]. Pathak VM, Navneet. (2017). Review on the current status of polymer degradation: a microbial approach, Bioresour Bioprocess, 4(1), 1-32, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0145-9 Links ]

[4]. Williams TM, Cooper LE. (2014). The environmental fate of oil and gas biocides: A review, NACE - Int Corros Conf Ser, 3876, 1-15. [ Links ]

[5]. Li XX, Liu JF, Zhou L, Mbadinga SM, Yang SZ, Gu JD, et al. (2017). Diversity and composition of sulfate-reducing microbial communities based on genomic DNA and RNA transcription in production water of high temperature and corrosive oil reservoir, Front Microbiol, 8, 1-17., DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01011Links ]

[6]. Kozlowicz B, Jensen T, Khambete M, Kadhum MJ, Garshol FK, Vik EA, et al. (2020). Scleroglucan polymer stability: Thermal, chemical, and microbial, Proc - SPE Symp Improv Oil Recover, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/200335-MSLinks ]

[7]. Newman MC. Fundamentals of the Science of Pollution. [ Links ]

[8]. Núñez M, Hurtado J. Bioensayos de toxicidad aguda con Daphnia magna, (2005). Rev peru biol, 12(1), 165-70. [ Links ]

[9]. Newman MC. (2019). Major Classes of Contaminants, Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology, 29-96, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351133999-2Links ]

[10]. Peraza R, Delgado V. (2012). Determinación de la concentración letal media (cl 50 ) de cuatro detergentes domésticos biodegradables en, Rev Int Contam Ambient, 28(2), 137-44. [ Links ]

[11]. Castro RH, Llanos S, Rodríguez J, Quintero HI, Manrique E. (2020). Polymers for eor application in high temperature and high viscosity oils: Rock-fluid behavior, Energies, 13 (22), 1-11,DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225944Links ]

[12]. International N. (2014). TM 0194-2014 Standard Test Method Field Monitoring of Bacterial Growth in Oil and Gas Systems, Vol. 8340. [ Links ]

[13]. Herigstad B, Hamilton M, Heersink J. (2001). How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria, J Microbiol Methods, 44 (2), 121-9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00241-4 Links ]

[14]. Dubois M, Gilles K, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. (1951). A colorimetric method for the determination of sugars, Nature, 168 (4265), 167, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/168167a0 Links ]

[15]. OECD. (1992). OECD 301 - Ready Biodegradability, OECD Guidel Test Chem, 301 (July), 1-62. [ Links ]

[16]. Georgia Gatidou, Niki Vazaiou, Nikolaos S. Thomaidis, Athanasios S. (2020). Stasinakis, Biodegradability assessment of food additives using OECD 301F respirometric test, Chemosphere, 241, 125071,ISSN 0045-6535, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125071. [ Links ]

[17]. Systems B, Guidelines O. (2008). Test No. 211: Daphnia magna Reproduction Test. Test No 211 Daphnia magna Reprod Test., (211) [ Links ]

[18]. OECD. (2019). Test No. 203: Fish, Acute Toxicity Testing, Section 2: Effects on Biotic Systems. Guidel Test Chem, 10. [ Links ]

[19]. OECD .(2011). Test No. 201: Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264069923-en. [ Links ]

[20]. OECD. (1992). Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals: 203 - Fish, Acute Toxicity Test. OECD iLibrary, pp. 1-8. [ Links ]

[21]. Sonnhof U, Grafe P, Krumnikl J, Linder M, Schindler L. (1975). Inhibitory postsynaptic actions of taurine, GABA and other amino acids on motoneurons of the isolated frog spinal cord. Brain Res, 100 (2), 327-41, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(75)90486-2Links ]

[22]. Zhu L, Li Z, Hiltunen E. (2018). Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris biomass harvesting by natural flocculant: Effects on biomass sedimentation, spent medium recycling and lipid extraction, Biotechnol Biofuels, 11 (1), 1-10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1183-z Links ]

[23]. Schuckit M a. (1967). Drug and Drug and, 5 (19), 311-27. [ Links ]

[24]. United States Enviromental Protection Agency. (2002). Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms Fifth Edition October 2002, Environ Prot, (October), 266. [ Links ]

[25]. Haynes W. (2013), Tukey’s Test. In: Dubitzky W., Wolkenhauer O., Cho KH ., Yokota H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Systems Biology. Springer, New York, NY, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1212 Links ]

[26]. Salinas ER, Bozich JS, Kolbenschlag S, Kary- Heinrich M, Hopp PW, Lukas R, et al. (2020). Aquatic testing guidelines insufficiently control the influence of dilution water toc and hardness on cationic polymer toxicity - A proposal to improve standardized test procedures. Chemosphere, 259, 127473, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127473 Links ]

[27]. Pizarro C. S, Ronco M. AM, Gotteland R. (2014). M. β-glucanos: ¿Qué tipos existen y cuáles son sus beneficios en la salud?, Rev Chil Nutr., 41 (4), 439-46, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182014000400014 Links ]

[28]. Survase SA, Saudagar PS, Bajaj IB, Singhal RS. Scleroglucan: Fermentative Production, Downstream Processing and Applications [ Links ]

[29]. Leonhardt B, Santa M, Steigerwald A, Kaeppler T. (2013). Polymer flooding with the polysaccharide Schizophyllan - First field trial results. Saint Petersbg Russ - From Fundam Sci to Deploy 17th Eur Symp Improv Oil Recover IOR 2013., 16-8, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20142599Links ]

[30]. Rücker C, Mahmoud WMM, Schwartz D, Kümmerer K. (2018). Biodegradation tests of mercaptocarboxylic acids, their esters, related divalent sulfur compounds and mercaptans, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 25 (19), 18393-411, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1812-x Links ]

AUTHORS

Zully-Patricia, Rodriguez-Mateus Affiliation: Desarrollo en Tecnologías de Hidrocarburos DTH SAS, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-6119 e-mail: zullyrodriguez-23@hotmail.com

Rosa-Carolina, Angarita Affiliation: Desarrollo en tecnologías de Hidrocarburos DTH SAS, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia ORCID: e-mail: rosacarolinaangarita@gmail.com

Jhorman-Alexis, Niño-Gomez Affiliation: Ecopetrol S.A., Santander-Colombia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-6904 e-mail: jhorman.nino@ecopetrol.com.co

Laura-Milena, Corredor Affiliation: Ecopetrol S.A., Santander, Colombia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-1460 e-mail: laura.corredor@ecopetrol.com.co

Sebastian, Llanos Gallo Affiliation: Tecnólogos e Ingenieros de la Industria del Petróleo TIP, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-7043 e-mail: sllanosgallo@gmail.com

Henderson, Quintero Affiliation: Ecopetrol S.A., Santander, Colombia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-442X e-mail: henderson.quintero@ecopetrol.com.co

Rubén-Hernán, Castro-García Affiliation: Meridian Consulting, Cundinamarca, Colombia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-4221 e-mail: ruben.castro@ecopetrol.com.co

How to cite: Rodríguez-Mateus, Z. P., Angarita, R. C., Niño-Gómez, J. A., Corredor, L. M., Llanos Gallo, S., Quintero, H., Castro-García, R. H. (2022). Biodegradation and toxicity of scleroglucan for enhanced oil recovery. CT&F - Ciencía, Tecnología y Futuro, 12(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.403

Received: December 08, 2021; Revised: February 03, 2022; Accepted: May 02, 2022

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License