SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue3Allelopathy from Campomanesia lineatifolia seed extract on Taraxacum officinaleTechnification-promoting policies and their effect on aquaculture productivity author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria

Print version ISSN 0122-8706On-line version ISSN 2500-5308

Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecuaria vol.22 no.3 Mosquera Sep./Dec. 2021  Epub Aug 31, 2021

https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol22_num3_art:2051 

Animal feed and nutrition

Productive and reproductive performance and blood chemistry on grazing Brahman replacement heifers supplemented with fatty acids and protein

Comportamiento productivo, reproductivo y química sanguínea de novillas de reemplazo Brahman a pastoreo suplementadas con ácidos grasos y proteína

José Luis Bello-Faria1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-1106

Robert Emilio Mora-Luna*  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-784X

Ana María Herrera-Angulo3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-4663

Bladimiro Acosta-Rivas4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-7184

1Universidad Nacional Experimental del Táchira (UNET). San Cristóbal

2Universidad Nacional Experimental del Táchira (UNET). San Cristóbal

3Universidad Nacional Experimental del Táchira (UNET). San Cristóbal

4Universidad Nacional Experimental del Táchira (UNET). San Cristóbal


Abstract

To evaluate the effect of calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids (CaLCFA) and protein supplementation on body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), pregnancy rate (PR), and blood chemistry, 57 Brahman heifers with 309.1 ± 3.04 kg BW and 1,010 ± 8.51 days of age, were divided into three BW uniform groups and assigned for 102 days to three treatments under a completely randomized design: 1) grazing forage only (F); 2) F+CaLCFA, and 3) F+CaLCFA+protein-energy mix (CaLCFA+CP) with 453 protein g/kg, containing mainly (g/kg) CaLCFA (200), hydrolyzed feather meal (300), and cornmeal (375). About 0.2 and 1 kg/animal/d of CaLCFA and CaLCFA+CP were offered, respectively, with an average intake of 200 and 192 g/animal/d for the same order of supplements. The breeding period (BP) lasted for 45 days and started 57 days after beginning the supplementation period. Body weight showed a treatment × time interaction (p < 0.01), being different at the end of the BP (348; 338 and 331 kg, respectively for CaLCFA, CaLCFA+CP, and F). Average daily gain (g/d) was higher (p < 0.01) for CaLCFA (358) than for CaLCFA+CP (281), and lower for F (206). Overall, PR was higher (p < 0.05) for CaLCFA+CP (68.4 %) and lower for F (36.8 %). Cholesterol (mg/dL) was higher (p < 0.05) for CaLCFA+CP (139) and lower for F (117). Calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids and CaLCFA+CP supplementation improved BW and ADG of Brahman heifers at first mating, while PR and cholesterol increased only with CaLCFA+CP supplementation.

Keywords biomass; cholesterol; live weight gain; pregnancy; supplements

Resumen

Para evaluar el efecto de la suplementación con sales de calcio de ácidos grasos de cadena larga (CaAGCL) y la adición de proteína, sobre peso vivo (PV), ganancia diaria de peso (GDP), porcentaje de preñez (PP) y química sanguínea, 57 novillas Brahman con PV de 309,1 ± 3,04 kg y 1.010 ± 8,51 días de edad, fueron divididas en tres grupos uniformes en peso y asignados a tres tratamientos durante 102 días siguiendo un diseño completamente aleatorio: 1) animales pastando forraje (F); 2) F+CaAGCL y 3) F+ suplementación con mezcla energética-proteica (CaAGCL+PC) de 453 g proteína/kg, conformada principalmente (g/kg) por CaAGCL (200), harina de pluma hidrolizada (300), harina de maíz (375). Se ofertaron 0,2 y 1 kg/animal/d de CaAGCL y CaAGCL+PC, respectivamente, con un consumo promedio de 200 y 192 g/animal/d para el mismo orden de suplementos. La temporada de servicio (TS) fue de 45 días y comenzó el día 57 de iniciada la suplementación. El PV mostró interacción tratamiento × tiempo (p < 0,01) siendo diferentes al final de la TS (348; 338 y 331 kg para CaAGCL, CaAGCL+PC y F, respectivamente). La GDP (g/d) fue mayor (p < 0,01) en CaAGCL (358) seguida por CaAGCL+PC (281) y más baja en F (206). El PP general fue mayor (p < 0,05) en CaAGCL+PC (68,4 %) y más bajo en F (31,6 %). El colesterol (mg/dL) fue mayor (p < 0,05) en CaAGCL+PC (139) y más bajo en F (117). La suplementación con CaAGCL y CaAGCL+PC mejora el PV y GDP de novillas Brahman de primer servicio, mientras el PP y colesterol se incrementa solo con la suplementación con AGCL+PC.

Palabras clave biomasa; colesterol; ganancia de peso vivo; preñez; suplementos

Introduction

Cattle (Bos indicus and B. taurus) production in Venezuela is a pastoral activity, subject to forage dry matter (DM) availability variations according to the year dry or rainy season (Mora et al., 2010). In the Venezuelan beef cattle production systems to provide roughage preserved (hay, silage) during the dry season is not a common practice, even in the Brahman cattle genetic centers (73.3 % of these) (Depablos et al., 2010). Therefore, the feeding practices seek to maximize the efficiency of forage use and/or correct nutrient deficiencies (Mora et al., 2014). The low quality of tropical forages is known in terms of crude protein (CP; 40-108 g/kg DM) (Lima et al., 2018; Mlay et al., 2006), metabolizable energy content (1.36-1.85 Mcal/kg DM) (Mlay et al., 2006), and the greater content of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), with values from 675 to 759 g/kg DM (Lima et al., 2018; Mlay et al., 2006). Higher NDF and lower protein values have been reported in some forage species at different seasons of the year in central (Depablos et al., 2009; Herrera et al., 2009) and western Llanos of Venezuela (Mora et al., 2014; Parada & Mora, 2019), therefore, the animals are subjected to periods of malnutrition during their productive life.

In addition to the environmental conditions, herds have groups of animals more susceptible to these effects of low supply of forage and nutrients such as replacement heifers (Chicco & Godoy, 2005). In beef cattle production, these animals must be mating at 2-year-old, however, under nutritional deficit conditions, growth is negatively affected and also the reproductive performance during the breeding season (Moriel et al., 2020). Therefore, low average daily gain delays puberty, increasing the age at first mating. In most of the country's farms, replacement heifers have the first mating at 3-year-old (Camaripano, 2013), however, with an improved fed management, only 18-20 % of these (Depablos et al., 2009).

Strategic supplementation in its different forms: energetic, protein, and mineral, has been considered an option to correct the nutrient deficiencies of the pastures and minimize the periods of undernutrition that the animals go through, as well as to increase the economic productivity of the livestock system. Chicco and Godoy (2005) suggested the use of low rumen load supplements, defined by these authors, as supplements with nutrient supply with a catalytic effect that maximize ruminal fermentation (greater degradation of organic matter and NDF, and higher production of volatile fatty acids, ammonia nitrogen, and microbial protein), taking up less space in this compartment to allow for greater forage intake. Additionally, low rumen load supplements including rumen-undegradable protein sources (hydrolyzed feather meal, fish meal, blood meal) may increase the flow of essential amino acids to the small intestine (Scholljegerdes et al., 2005).

Another supplementation option are calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids (CaLCFA), which like other fats increase diet energy density, besides minimize the negative effects of unsaturated fats on rumen fermentation and digestion (Palmquist & Jenkins, 2017), and because they are protected from biohydrogenation in this compartment, the absorption in the small intestine of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids is increased (Purushothaman et al., 2008). Additionally, supplementation with CaLCFA improves the reproduction in cattle, associated with an increase in the concentration of cholesterol and progesterone (Sklan et al., 1991), as well as a greater number of larger follicles (Lucy et al., 1991), since cholesterol-LCFA esters are a critical component of follicular steroidogenesis associated with the maturation of dominant follicles (Gwynne & Strauss III, 1982).

For these reasons, the objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of supplementation with CaLCFA and CaLCFA + protein, using hydrolyzed feather meal as the main source of rumenundegradable protein, on body weight (BW) changes, reproductive variables, and some components of blood chemistry of Brahman replacement heifers grazing in the western Llanos of Venezuela, as well as evaluating quantity and quality of forage along the experimental period.

Materials and methods

Experiment management

The experiment was carried out in the western Llanos of Venezuela at the “Agropecuaria El Caibón S/C”, located at 07°22′29″N and 71°10′13″W, Santa Cruz de Guacas, Barinas State. The weather of this region is classified as tropical savanna (Peel et al., 2007), with an annual average pluviometry of 1,800 to 2,400 mm during the rainy season from April to December, with dry periods between January and March (Marvéz, 2003). The experiment was initiated in November (end of the rainy season) and ended in February (dry season) for a duration of 102 d. The historical average monthly rainfall in the region for November, December, January, and February was 59, 28, 12, and 9 mm, respectively. The historical record included rainfall between the years 2011-2017 according to (Instituto Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología [INAMEH], 2020), and between 2019-2021 recorded on-farm. The farm has soils with silty clay loam texture; pH of 4.6-5.8 and organic matter content of 1.80-5.70 %.

Table 1. Dry matter (DM) content and fatty acids profile of CaLCFA supplement 

Note:1Made with plant-based oils from Elaeis guineensis Jacq (Oil palm). Assurance levels provided by the manufacturer.

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Fifty-seven Brahman replacement heifers with 309.1 ± 3.04 kg BW (mean+ se) and 1,010 ± 8.51 d of age (or 33.2 ± 0.28 months), were divided in three BW uniform groups, and assigned to three treatments: 1) grazing forage only (F); 2) F + CaLCFA (table 1); and 3) F + CaLCFA + protein-energy mix, with 453 g CP/kg DM (CaLCFA+CP, table 2). The supplements were offered in quantities of 200 g/animal/d and 1 kg/animal/d, for CaLCFA and CaLCFA+CP, respectively. Daily, the two supplemented groups were taken up and each heifer was supplemented individually between 6:30 and 7:00 hours. In the paddocks, all animals had free access to 50 g/animal/d of a mineral mix (250 and 85 g/kg of Ca and P, respectively), and water from a natural source. The supplements (CaLCFA and CaLCFA+CP) offered and orts were weighed daily with a portable weight (Pocket Balance, Germany). The supplements intake was calculated by subtracting their amount in the orts from the daily amounts offered.

The animals were kept in a rotational system (63 ha) with 12 paddocks (5.25 ha), 9 d in and 27 d out of them, in pastures with Urochloa arrecta (Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz) Morrone & Zuloaga mainly, and U. humidicola (Rendle) Morrone & Zuloaga (Poaceae) and Leersia hexandra Swartz, with an average stocking rate of 0.76 AU/ha. Animals were kept in three paddocks for 9 d and then rotated in the same paddocks every 3 d to minimize the pasture effect. The supplementation started 57 d before the beginning of the breeding period, the latter lasting 45 d. Heifers were bred by artificial insemination using Holstein’s sexed semen at the first insemination and Holstein’s non-sexed semen at the second one.

Table 2. Supplement composition 

Note:ag/kg as fed. CaLCFA: calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids. DM: dry matter. CP: crude protein. EE: ether extract. NDF: neutral detergent fiber. ADF: acid detergent fiber. OM: organic matter. Ca: calcium. P: phosphorus. ME: metabolizable energy.

Source: Elaborated by the authors

The breeding period started in January (the beginning of the dry season). During the latter, before supplementation (6:00 h), heifers were grouped into three pens (one pen/treatment) and observed for 30 min for heat detection, using one teaser bull per group. The same heat observation procedure was repeated at 16:30 h.

Forage sampling

Systematic forage samplings were taken considering the spatial and botanical variability of the pasture. Six forage samples per paddock were taken every 9 d (when starting the grazing of a group of three paddocks), for a total of n = 198 samples. The samples were collected using a metal frame (Paladines, 1992) of 0.375 m2 for a harvest area of 6.75 m2/d. Forage was harvested clipping at 10 cm above ground level. Canopy height within the sampling area was measured twice per frame using a graduated ruler (precision of 1 cm), and canopy cover was expressed as the percentage of soil covered by forage. To determine biomass, forage samples were pre-dried in a forced-air oven (Thelco®, Model 6M, U.S.A.) at 60 °C until constant weight according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2016). Sixty-six composite samples were made, two per paddock. Each sample was divided into two fractions for structural and chemical analysis. For the former, according to Chacón et al. (1977), green, dead, leaf and stem percentages, green:dead ratio and leaf:stem ratio were calculated.

For chemical analysis, the remaining fraction was ground (Thomas Wiley®, Model 4, U.S.A) in 1 mm sieve, and was analyzed according to AOAC (2016) for DM by gravimetric estimation at 105 °C, CP by Kjeldahl method (N × 6.25) and ash by ignition at 550 °C. The NDF was performed according to Van Soest and Wine (1967) without sodium sulfite, and Ca and P were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AOAC, 2016) and colorimetric procedure (Fiske & Subbarow, 1925), respectively.

Chemical analysis of CaLCFA+CP supplement was performed. Dry matter, CP, ash Ca and P were determined by the same methods described for forage samples, ether extract by reflux with hot petroleum ether (AOAC, 2016), and NDF and acid detergent fiber according to McQueen and Nicholson (1979) and Van Soest (1973), respectively (table 2). Supplement metabolizable energy was calculated based on theoretical values of cane molasses according to National Research Council (NRC, 2000) and CaLCFA from oil palm according to De Blas et al., (2010); cornmeal (Zea mays, ground grain and cob), and hydrolyzed feather meal according to in vitro DM true digestibility reported by Mora et al., (2015), transformed into digestible energy according to Heaney and Pigden (1963) and subsequently to metabolizable energy according to NRC (2000). Rumen-degradable and undegradable proteins of the supplements were estimated according to the values reported by NRC (2000) for each ingredient.

Animal sampling

Animal BW was measured (Iderna®, Capacity 3,000 kg, Venezuela) at 0, 28, 56, 84 and 102 days of the experimental period (one weighing per animal per day), with no access to grazing and water 16 h before weighing. The average daily gain (ADG) in each period was calculated.

Blood samples were taken by jugular puncture from six animals per treatment randomly selected at the beginning of the experiment. The same animals were sampled at the same time when BW was determined. The samples were collected with 21G×1” needles (BD Vacutainer®, USA) and deposited in tubes Vacuum Diagnostics® (6 mL, China) without anticoagulant. Blood samples were centrifuged (IEC Centrifuges®, Model Clinical, U.S.A.) at 915 × g for 15 min, and serum was kept at -20 °C (Bosch® Model GSD32, Germany) to determine glucose (Trinder, 1969) and cholesterol (Allain et al., 1974) by enzymatic-colorimetric procedure, and urea by enzymatic kinetic (Tiffany et al., 1972). Wiener lab kits (Wiener lab®, Argentina) were used to determine glucose and cholesterol concentrations, while Invelab kit (INVELAB S.A.®, Venezuela) was used for urea determination. Absorbance readings were taken on a Microlab 200 spectrophotometer (Lab Wiener 2000, Germany) at a wavelength of 505 nm for glucose and cholesterol, and 340 nm for urea, according to the kit instructions.

Animals were palpated transrectally (Bekele et al., 2016) at 0, 28, 56 d of the experimental period, to detect the presence of ovarian structures (follicles and corpus luteum). Pregnancy was detected by transrectal palpation, at 45 d after the end of the breeding period (Bekele et al., 2016). The number of animals born from the animals of each treatment was recorded during the calving period.

Statistical analyses

Forage variables data were grouped in periods (0-28, 29-56, 57-84, and 85-102 d of experiment) and treated by ANOVA according to a complete randomized design, using the GLM procedure of SAS® (University Edition). The statistical model was Yij = µ + Pi +Eij, where Yij is a dependent variable, µ is the mean for all observations, Pi is the effect of period i, and Eij is a random error (Montgomery, 2017). The green:dead and leaf:stem ratios, as well as Ca were transformed to neperian logarithm (Ott & Longnecker, 2010). Differences among periods were evaluated using the Tukey-Kramer procedure for unbalanced data (Montgomery, 2017).

Data for BW, ADG and blood chemistry were treated by ANOVA as a complete randomized design, with measurement repeated using the MIXED procedure of SAS® according to the following statistical model: Yijk = µ + Di + Aij +Tk + (D×T)ik + Eijk, where Yijk is the response at time k on animal j in treatment i, µ is the overall mean, Di is the fixed effect of treatment i, Aij is the random effect of animal j in the treatment i, Tk is the fixed effect of time k, (D×T)ik is the fixed interaction effect of treatment i with the time k, and E ijk is a random error at time k on animal j in treatment i (Littell et al., 1998). Differences among treatments were evaluated using Tukey’s test (Montgomery, 2017). When the interaction Treatment × Time was significant the PLM procedure of SAS® and Tukey’s test were used. The presence of ovarian structures, pregnancy and calving were considered binary variables and were analyzed by logistic regression (Ott & Longnecker, 2010) using the GENMOD procedure of SAS®. The results were expressed as a percentage.

Results and discussion

Biomass and structural and chemical análisis

The amount of biomass in the paddocks (table 3) showed variations during the experimental time with lower values corresponding to periods 0-28 d (2,402 kg DM/ha) and 84-102 d (2,249 kg DM/ha). The lower value of biomass at the beginning of the experiment may be to the fact that the pastures were grazed by other animals prior to the experiment with a greater stocking rate. However, biomass gradually increased (10 %) and by the end of the experiment diminished (23.2 %) due to limited rainfall. In all cases biomass was always higher than 2,000 kg DM/ha, the value suggested by Minson (1990) as sufficient for an adequate intake under grazing conditions. Similar average values of U. arrecta biomass (2,264 kg DM/ha; harvested at 28 days of age) were observed by Homen et al., (2010) in Venezuela between November and February months, end of the rainy season and dry season, respectively. Nevertheless, at the end of the experiment, biomass was lower than 30 kg of DM/AU/d suggested by Lamela (1992) as the adequate amount. This decrease was probably due to limited rainfall as was observed by Herrera et al., (2017) in the dry season in western Llanos of Barinas State.

Table 3. Biomass and structural analysis of forage 

Note:a, b, c Means with different superscripts in the same row are different (p < 0.05).

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Canopy height and canopy cover (table 3) decreased along the experimental period, possibly due to the decrease in rainfall, during that time of year, characteristic of the region. Growth inhibition under drought is a typical defense reaction among plants. Water deficit in the soil leads primarily to the reduction of the water potential of plant shoots and the stimulation of the growth of the root system (Staniak, 2016). The greater canopy height observed until day 56 of the experiment (> 36.7 cm) could have favored a greater DM intake (Paula et al., 2012), due to an increase in the size of the bite (Allden & Whittaker, 1970). From day 56, the canopy height began to decrease, which could negatively affect the DM intake.

The green and leaf material percentages, as well as the green:dead and leaf:stem ratios (table 3) decreased along the experiment, which can negatively affect the DM intake since the animals prefer to eat the green and leaf fractions of the forage. Once the grazing animal is accustomed to eating the leaf fraction, it appears to continue to search out the leaf even when very little is present, and this can lead to very low forage intake (Minson, 1983). Additionally, the animal prefers to restrict the forage intake rather than increase the stem consumption (Minson, 1982), this explains the increase of the stem fraction during the experimental period. The amount of green leaf per hectare followed the same behavior as the percentage of green material and was always less than 1,000 kg DM/ha, which may have a negative effect on the leaf selection, and consequently, the organic matter intake by the animal decreases (Chacon & Stobbs, 1976).

Crude protein and NDF of forage (table 4) decreased throughout the experimental time. In the first three periods, CP was higher than 700 g/kg DM, which is the lower limit to sustain microbial growth and support efficient fibrous carbohydrate digestion in rumen (Lazzarini et al., 2009), however, at the end of the experiment (85-102 d) dropped to 616 g/kg DM, this might have a negative effect on forage intake (Milford & Minson, 1966). The decrease of CP concentration, probably was due to the leaf fraction decrease, since CP content in the leaves is greater than stems (Queiroz et al., 2012). In addition, CP concentration in plants is the result of nitrogen uptake which is greatly determined by water availability (Allahdadi & Bahreininejad, 2019). Crude protein forage content was adequate to heifer requirements to have a minimum ADG of 291 g/d (NRC, 2000) only during the first 56 d of the experiment.

On the other hand, NDF of forage was within the range reported in tropical grasses (675-759 g/kg DM; Lima et al., 2018; Mlay et al., 2006) and showed the highest values at the end of the rainy season (721 g/kg DM), and gradually decreased until reaching 666 g/kg DM at the end of the experiment (dry season). The calcium content of forage decreased along of experimental period, while P was not influenced (table 4). Calcium was greater than P content, which was opposite to observed from other authors in forages of the western Llanos of Venezuela (Herrera et al., 2017; Mora et al., 2014; Parada & Mora, 2019). Both mineral elements showed adequate concentrations to satisfy the requirements of replacement heifers (NRC, 2000).

Table 4. Forage chemical composition during the experiment 

Note:CP: crude protein. NDF: neutral detergent fiber. Ca: calcium. P: phosphorus. a, b, c Means with different superscripts in the same row are different (p < 0.01). 1309-430 kg BW replacement heifers and ADG of 291 g/d (NRC, 2000).

Source: Elaborated by the authors

The intake of CaLCFA supplement was complete (200 g/animal/d), while the average intake of CaLCFA+CP supplement was 192 g/animal/d. Although the low consumption of the CaLCFA+CP supplement may be associated with the low palatability of hydrolyzed feather meal (Aderibigbe & Church, 1983). Recent research using 180-360 g/animal/d of this ingredient does not report rejection or decrease in its consumption (Mora et al., 2014, 2015; Ngu et al., 2019).

Body weight and average daily gain

Heifers BW showed an interaction treatment × time (figure 1), being similar at the beginning of the experiment (309.1 ± 3.04 kg), however, at day 28 superiority in CaLCFA of 4.5 % and 3.5 % was observed over F and CaLCFA+CP, respectively. At the beginning of the breeding season (day 56), the superiority of CaLCFA was maintained, with BW 2.28 % greater than the other two treatments, which presented similar weights among them. At the end of the experiment the three treatments showed different BW, being CaLCFA greater than CaLCFA+CP (2.96 %) and F (5.15 %), and CaLCFA+CP greater than F (2.11 %), this latter lost BW in the last period of the experiment. Body weights at the beginning of the breeding season were 328, 336 and 329 kg for F, CaLCFA and CaLCFA+CP, respectively. These values are lower than 340 kg, suggested as adequate by Camaripano (2013) for mating and to ensure a higher pregnancy rate in Brahman heifers, BW that was only reached by CaLCFA along the breeding season.

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Figure 1. Effect of the interaction treatment × time (p < 0.01) on body weight of Brahman replacement heifers. F (¨), CaLCFA (■), CaLCFA+CP (▲). 

On the other hand, ADG was influenced by treatments, with greater gains (g/d) for CaLCFA (358) in relation to CaLCFA+CP (281), and lower for F (206) compared to the former two treatments (table 5). The better response when using CaLCFA, possibly is the conjunction with forage feeding. When ruminants are fed with a forage-based diet, the amount of ruminal acetate produced is greater (Kozloski, 2019), and CaLCFA supplementation also increases ruminal acetate (Behan et al., 2019). This latter is the most important source of metabolizable energy through its oxidation and is also the main substrate for lipogenesis (Kozloski, 2019). When formaldehyde-treated lipid supplements are added to the diet, there was a reduction in the partitioning of acetate towards lipogenesis (Yang et al., 1978), therefore increase the availability of acetate for oxidative purposes (Van Houtert et al., 1990), this may help explain why supplementation with CaLCFA improves ADG and BW.

Table 5. Average daily gain (ADG) and blood chemistry of Brahman replacement heifers supplemented with CaLCFA and CaLCFA+CP 

Note:1mg/dL. a, b, c Means with different superscripts in the same row are different (p < 0.01). SEM: Standard error of the mean.

Source: Elaborated by the authors

With the use of CaLCFA and a bypass protein meal of 438 g CP/kg DM (formaldehyde-treated cottonseed meal) in heifers, Van Houtert et al. (1990) observed that when adding CaLCFA (100; 200 o 300 g/animal/d) to 300 g of bypass protein meal, the ADG increased compared to the heifer's group that did not receive CaLCFA (372 vs. 419 g/d), and this response was maximized when 900 g of bypass protein meal were added (469 vs. 616 g/d). This greater ADG response was not observed in the present experiment when CaLCFA+CP was used, possibly due to the low consumption of this supplement (192 g/animal/d), which also implied an average CaLCFA intake of 34.3 g/animal/d and 51.4 g/animal/d of hydrolyzed feather meal.

The greater ADG of CaLCFA+CP compared to F, may be due to the CP and rumen-undegradable protein intake through a supplement, which was estimated at 77.6 and 36 g/animal/d, respectively. Sawyer et al. (2012) observed that a low intake of CP as 40 g/animal/d of CP with 30 g of rumenundegradable protein content (blood and feather meal mix), can replace 160 g CP/animal/d of cottonseed meal supplement (88 g rumen-degradable protein) and maintain ruminal function. Sawyer et al. (2012) indicated that protein sources greater in rumen-undegradable protein may improve CP use efficiency when fed at lesser amounts by minimizing ruminal and metabolic N losses and maintaining NDF fermentation. In addition, Mora et al. (2015) observed that supplementation with hydrolyzed feather meal led a ruminal environment of volatile fatty acids and organic matter degradation of forage similar to that produced when soybean meal supplement was used, and superior to the non-supplemented group.

Average daily gain showed treatment × time interaction (table 5 and figure 2) with more persistent values greater than 400 g/d when animals were supplemented with CaLCFA, during 3 of 4 evaluations of ADG.

In the period from 29 to 56 d, CaLCFA+CP and F showed an ADG greater than CaLCFA, however, it was not enough to reach the BW of CaLCFA, due to greater ADG of the latter, in the previous evaluation period.

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Figure 2. Effect of the interaction treatment × time (p < 0.01) on average daily gain (ADG) of Brahman replacement heifers. F (¨), CaLCFA (■), CaLCFA+CP (▲). 

Along 57-84 d period, all treatments showed ADG with no difference and decreased compared to the previous period, particularly CaLCFA showed its lower ADG along the experimental period. It was possibly due to the beginning of the breeding period at 56 days, the animals were kept in the pens twice a day for heat detection, which could have a negative influence on the dry matter intake of forage, and therefore on the ADG, since they were not adapted to this management.

In the final period of the experiment (85-102 d), despite the decrease in the forage quality (CP, NDF, green, dead, leaf, stem) as well as in the quantity (biomass, canopy height, canopy cover), the CaLCFA supplemented group showed greater ADG, followed by CaLCFA+CP, and BW losses in CONTROL. Probably the supplements were able to compensate for the decrease in the quality and quantity of the pasture.

Blood chemistry

Serum blood glucose concentration (table 5) was no affected by the treatments, however, was affected by the factor time, being highest at the beginning of the experiment, and greater than the critical value of 40 mg/dL (González, 2000) along the experiment. This result is opposite from Cappellozza et al. (2014) using Angus × Hereford heifers with 226 d of age and 200 kg BW, they observed greater glucose concentration on an animal with protein (65.1 mg/dL) and energetic supplementation (65.0 mg/dL) vs. the no supplemented group (59.3 mg/dL). Nevertheless, in tropical conditions, supplementation with protein sources did not affect glucose concentrations in Brahman first-calf heifers under grazing conditions (Mora et al., 2014), nor crossbred cows in confinement conditions (Mora et al., 2015).

Serum blood urea concentration (table 5) was not influenced by treatments, being these values within the reported reference (15-42 mg/dL), which indicates that there was no low protein intake, nor a high intake of rumen-degradable protein (Wittwer, 2000). Similar results were reported by (Mora et al., 2014) in grazing animals and supplemented with 200 and 420 g CP/d.

The factor time influenced urea concentration, with lower values during the first 84 d of the experiment, and higher at day 102 (39.7 mg/dL). This increase may be due to the decrease in forage biomass (quantity, height, green, leaf) and therefore possible lower consumption of structural carbohydrates during this stage of the experiment, since a decrease in energy intake inversely influences the concentration of ruminal ammonium due to a reduction in the microbial protein synthesis, increasing the concentration of blood urea (Wittwer, 2000). A similar increase in urea concentration (in milk) was observed by Herrera et al. (2017), when biomass was lower than 2,000 kg DM/ha.

On the other hand, serum cholesterol was influenced by supplementation type (table 5) with higher concentrations for CaLCFA+CP (139 mg/dL) and lower for F (117 mg/dL). This result was unexpected, due to the low consumption of CaLCFA (34.3 g/animal/d) through the CaLCFA+CP supplement. The results are contrary to those observed by different authors (Espinoza et al., 2010; Long et al., 2014), who observed higher concentrations of blood cholesterol when the animals were supplemented with CaLCFA (100 to 200 g/animal/d). Previously was described the reduction in the partitioning of acetate towards lipogenesis when bypass fat was used, and greater acetate would be available for oxidative purposes. Therefore, lesser acetyl-coenzyme A could be used for cholesterol synthesis, which begins with the condensation of two acetyl-coenzyme A molecules (Nelson & Cox, 2014). This can explain partially the lack of response in the cholesterol concentration for CaLCFA. The average cholesterol concentrations along the experimental time, in the three treatments were within the normal range 66-166 mg/dL (Wittwer, 2000).

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Figure 3. Effect of the interaction treatment × time (p < 0.01) on serum blood cholesterol concentration of Brahman replacement heifers. F (¨), CaLCFA (■), CaLCFA+CP (▲). 

Serum cholesterol showed an interaction treatment × time (table 5 and figure 3), being lower in CaLCFA+CP at day 0, and increasing progressively, with higher concentrations after the breeding period started (84 and 102 d), and slightly above the normal range, while in F group, cholesterol concentrations decreased in the same period. The decrease in the forage quality and the decrease in the F group of ADG and cholesterol concentration, allows us to infer that there was a decrease in the energy provide since the decrease in cholesterol concentration indicates a low energy intake in the diet (Wittwer, 2000).

Reproductive variables

The percentage of animals with follicle and corpus luteum (table 6) at day 0; 28 and 56 was similar among treatments, while at day 28, the percentage of animals with no ovarian structures was greater in CaLCFA (63.1 %) and lower in CaLCFA+CP (15.7 %).

Pregnancy rate at the first insemination (table 6) tended (p = 0.07) to be greater in CaLCFA+CP and lower in CaLCFA and F. Pregnancy rate corresponding to the second insemination was similar among treatments. The low number of animals at the second insemination could be limiting to detect differences among treatments (Ferguson & Chalupa, 1989).

The overall pregnancy rate (table 6) was greater in CaLCFA+CP and lower in F. The improvement on the reproductive performance in the CaLCFA+CP supplemented group, may be due to the contribution of the amino acids glutamate and aspartate, that are found in high concentrations in hydrolyzed feather meal (Divakala et al., 2009; Pacheco et al., 2016). Glutamate and aspartate are considered excitatory amino acids and are an essential component of the neuroendocrine transmission line that regulates anterior pituitary luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone secretion (Brann & Mahesh, 1994).

Table 6. Reproductive performance of Brahman replacement heifers supplemented with CaLCFA and CaLCFA+CP 

Note:a, b Means with different superscripts in the same row are different (p < 0.05). 1Sexed semen. 2Non-sexed semen.

Source: Elaborated by the authors

The increase in cholesterol concentrations in blood serum along the breeding period in CaLCFA+CP, also may be able to improve the pregnancy rate since cholesterol serves as a precursor for progesterone synthesis by ovarian luteal cells. Progesterone prepares the uterus for implantation of the embryo and also helps maintain pregnancy (Funston, 2004). The increase in progesterone concentrations has been associated with a better conception rate (Butler et al., 1996; Sklan et al., 1991).

The lack of response in the pregnancy rate for CaLCFA, despite having a greater BW at the beginning of the breeding period, may be due to a long supplementation period (102 d). Lammoglia et al. (2000) observed that supplementing replacement heifers with fat (Safflower seeds; Carthamus tinctorius L. cv. Centennial (Asteraceae) during 162 d, did not improve pregnancy rate, due to a dietary fat-reproduction antagonism. The authors suggested a feeding period with the fat of approximately 60 d before the beginning of the breeding period, due to the increase in backfat thickness changed dramatically after 56 d of supplementation, the value that remained until day 162. Increased body fat content has been associated with increased blood leptin concentration (Chilliard et al., 2005; Long et al., 2007), and the latter also increases in heifers due to the effect of CaLCFA supplementation (5 d/week, 276 and 200 g/animal/d) (Long et al., 2007, 2014, respectively) during 60 d before the beginning of the breeding period. In the ovaries, thecal cells have high-affinity receptors for leptin, leading to an inhibition of insulin-induced progesterone and androstenedione production, reducing, therefore, ovarian activity (Spicer & Francisco, 1998). In beef heifers, no difference was observed in the pregnancy rate among the control group and the saturated or unsaturated rumen bypass fat supplemented groups (Long et al., 2014).

The calving rate was not affected by treatments on both sexed and non-sexed semen inseminated animals, the same response was observed in the overall calving rate.

Conclusions

The decrease in biomass and forage structure (canopy height, canopy cover, green, leaf, green:dead and leaf:stem ratios) as well as in CP content, could affect negatively the forage intake by heifers. The Ca and P content in the forage were adequate to satisfy replacement heifer requirements.

Supplementation with CaLCFA and CaLCFA+CP improved BW and ADG of Brahman heifers at first mating, despite the low quantity and quality of forage at the end of the experiment. However, reproductive performance and blood serum cholesterol concentrations increased only with CaLCFA+CP supplementation, in spite of low consumption of the supplement.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the UNET Research Dean for partial funding through project number 02-005-10, and Dr. Claudio F. Chicco (†) for his assistance in the formulation and evolution of overarching research goals and aims.

References

Aderibigbe, A. O., & Church, D. C. (1983). Feather and hair meals for ruminants. II. Comparative evaluation of feather and hair meals as protein supplements. Journal of Animal Science, 57(2), 473-482. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.572473x Links ]

Allahdadi, M., & Bahreininejad, B. (2019). Effects of water stress on growth parameters and forage quality of globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus L.). Iran Agricultural Research, 38(2), 101-110. https://iar.shirazu.ac.ir/article_5596_0d82535bbf1a58118eac41634fd5e25c.pdf Links ]

Allain, C. C., Poon, L. S., Chan, C. S. G., Richmond, W., & Fu, P. C. (1974). Enzymantic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clinical Chemistry, 20(4), 470-475. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/20.4.470 Links ]

Allden, W. G., & Whittaker, I. A. M. (1970). The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: the interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 21(5), 755-766. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9700755 Links ]

Association of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC]. (2016). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (20th ed.). [ Links ]

Behan, A. A., Loh, T. C., Fakurazi, S., Kaka, U., Kaka, A., & Samsudin, A. A. (2019). Effects of supplementation of rumen protected fats on rumen ecology and digestibility of nutrients in sheep. Animals, 9(7), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070400 Links ]

Bekele, N., Addis, M., Abdela, N., & Ahmed, W. M. (2016). Pregnancy diagnosis in cattle for fertility management: A review. Global Veterinaria, 16(4), 355-364. https://idosi.org/gv/gv16(4)16/7.pdf Links ]

Brann, D. W., & Mahesh, V. B. (1994). Excitatory amino acids: function and significance in reproduction and neuroendocrine regulation. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 15(1), 3-49. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.1994.1002 Links ]

Butler, W. R., Calaman, J. J., & Beam, S. W. (1996). Plasma and milk Urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(4), 858-865. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.744858x Links ]

Camaripano, L. (2013). Preñez en vacas Brahman de primer servicio (novillas) y primera lactancia ¿qué las afecta? In J. Salomón, R. Romero, M. Arias, & J. De Venanzi (Eds.), XXXVIII Cursillo sobre Bovinos de Carne (pp. 1-37). Universidad Central de Venezuela. [ Links ]

Cappellozza, B. I., Cooke, R. F., Reis, M. M., Moriel, P., Keisler, D. H., & Bohnert, D. W. (2014). Supplementation based on protein or energy ingredients to beef cattle consuming low-quality coolseason forages: II. Performance, reproductive, and metabolic responses of replacement heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 92(6), 2725-2734. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013.7442 Links ]

Chacon, E., & Stobbs, T. H. (1976). Influence of progressive defoliation of a rass sward on the eating behaviour of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 27(5), 709-727. https://doi.org/10.1071/ar9760709 Links ]

Chacón, E., Stobbs, T. H., & Haydock, K. P. (1977). Estimation of leaf and stem contents of oesophageal extrusa samples from cattle. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 43(1/2), 73-75. [ Links ]

Chicco, C. F., & Godoy, S. (2005). Restricciones y alternativas para la nutrición de bovinos en el trópico. In R. Romero, J. Salomón, & J. De Venanzi (Eds.), XX Cursillo sobre Bovinos de Carne (pp. 157-190). Universidad Central de Venezuela. [ Links ]

Chilliard, Y., Delavaud, C., & Bonnet, M. (2005). Leptin expression in ruminants: Nutritional and physiological regulations in relation with energy metabolism. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 29(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.02.026 Links ]

De Blas, C., Mateos, G. G., & García-Rebollar, P. (2010). Tablas FEDNA de composición y valor nutritivo de alimentos para la fabricación de piensos compuestos (3.. ed.). Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal. [ Links ]

Depablos, L., Ojeda, Á., Martínez, G., & Colmenares, O. (2010). Caracterización de centros genéticos de ganado Brahman adscritos a programas cooperativos de mejoramiento animal en Venezuela. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (UCV), 36(3), 95-106. http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_agro/article/view/10839 Links ]

Depablos, L., Ordóñez, J., Godoy, S., & Chicco, C. F. (2009). Suplementación mineral proteica de novillas a pastoreo en los Llanos Centrales de Venezuela. Zootecnia Tropical, 27(3), 249-262. http://ve.scielo.org/pdf/zt/v27n3/art04.pdf Links ]

Divakala, K. C., Chiba, L. I., Kamalakar, R. B., Rodning, S. P., Welles, E. G., Cummins, K. A., Swann, J., Cespedes, F., & Payne, R. L. (2009). Amino acid supplementation of hydrolyzed feather meal diets for finisher pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 87(4), 1270-1281. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1121Links ]

Espinoza, J. L., Ortega, R., Palacios, A., & Guillén, A. (2010). Efecto de la suplementación de grasas sobre características productivas, tasas de preñez y algunos metabolitos de los lípidos en vacas para carne en pastoreo. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria, 42, 25-32. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/amv/v42n1/art04.pdf Links ]

Ferguson, J. D., & Chalupa, W. (1989). Impact of protein nutrition on reproduction in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 72(3), 746-766. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022.0302(89)79168-2Links ]

Fiske, C. H., & Subbarow, Y. (1925). The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 66(2), 375-400. https://www.jbc.org/content/66/2/375.full.pdf Links ]

Funston, R. N. (2004). Fat supplementation and reproduction in beef females. Journal of Animal Science, 82(Suppl. 13), E154E161.https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1608&context=animalscifacpubLinks ]

González, F. H. D. (2000). Uso do perfil metabólico para determinar o status nutricional em gado de corte. In F. H. D. González, J. O. Barcellos, H. Ospina, & L. A. O. Ribeiro (Eds.), Perfil metabólico em ruminantes: seu uso em nutrição e doenças nutricionais (pp. 63-74). Gráfica da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. https://lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/26657/000274557.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Links ]

Gwynne, J. T., & Strauss III, J. F. (1982). The role of lipoproteins in steroidogenesis and cholesterol metabolism in steroidogenic glands. Endocrine Reviews, 3(3), 299-329. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv3-3-29Links ]

Heaney, D. P., & Pigden, W. J. (1963). Interrelationships and conversion factors between expressions of the digestible energy value of forages. Jounnal of Animal Science, 22(4), 956-960. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1963.224956x Links ]

Herrera, A. M., Martínez, N., Herrera, P., Colmenares, O., & Birbe, B. (2009). Consumo de heno y producción de leche en vacas doble propósito suplementadas con bloques multinutricionales. Zootecnia Tropical, 27(4), 465-473. http://ve.scielo.org/pdf/zt/v27n4/art12.pdf Links ]

Herrera, A. M., Mora, R. E., Isea, J. C., Eslava, J. F., & Darghan, A. E. (2017). Producción y composición química de leche de vacas F1 Holstein × Cebú suplementadas con dos fuentes de nitrógeno no proteico. Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia, 27(2), 119-130.http://www.saber.ula.ve/bitstream/handle/123456789/43499/articulo7.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yLinks ]

Homen, M., Entrena, I., & Arriojas, L. (2010). Biomasa y valor nutritivo de tres gramíneas forrajeras en diferentes períodos del año en la zona de bosque húmedo tropical, Barlovento, estado Miranda. Zootecnia Tropical, 28(1), 115-127. http://ve.scielo.org/pdf/zt/v28n1/art15.pdf Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología [INAMEH]. (2020). Boletín Climático Mensual. Noviembre, Diciembre, Enero y Febrero 2011-2017. Instituto Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología. http://www.inameh.gob.ve/web/PDF/_gsdata_/_saved_/Links ]

Kozloski, G. V. (2019). Bioquímica dos ruminantes. Terceira edição. (3.. ed.). Editora UFSM. [ Links ]

Lamela, L. (1992). Sistemas de producción de leche. In T. Clavero (Ed.), Producción e Investigación en Pastos Tropicales (pp. 151-160). Universidad del Zulia. [ Links ]

Lammoglia, M. A., Bellows, R. A., Grings, E. E., Bergman, J. W., Bellows, S. E., Short, R. E., Hallford, D. M., & Randel, R. D. (2000). Effects of dietary fat and sire breed on puberty, weight, and reproductive traits of F1 beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 78(9), 2244-2252. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7892244x Links ]

Lazzarini, I., Detmann, E., Sampaio, C. B., Paulino, M. F., Valadares Filho, S. D. C., Souza, M. A., & Oliveira, F. A. (2009). Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38(10), 2021-2030. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516.35982009001000024 Links ]

Lima, D. M., Abdalla Filho, A. L., Lima, P. M. T., Sakita, G. Z., Dias e Silva, T. P., McManus, C., Abdalla, A. L., & Louvandini, H. (2018). Morphological characteristics, nutritive quality, and methane production of tropical grasses in Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 53(3), 323-331. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2018000300007Links ]

Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R., & Ammerman, C. B. (1998). Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science, 76(4), 1216-1231. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7641216xLinks ]

Long, N. M., Burns, T. A., Duckett, S. K., & Schafer, D. W. (2014). Reproductive performance and serum fatty acid profiles of underdeveloped beef heifers supplemented with saturated or unsaturated rumen bypass fat compared to an isocaloric control. Professional Animal Scientist, 30(5), 502-509. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2014-01311Links ]

Long, N. M., Hill, G. M., Baker, J. F., Graves, W. M., Froetschel, M. A., Keisler, D. H., & Mullinix, B. G. (2007). Reproductive performance of beef heifers supplemented with corn gluten feed and rumen-protected fat before breeding. Professional Animal Scientist, 23(4), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30984-0Links ]

Lucy, M. C., Staples, C. R., Michel, F. M., Thatcher, W. W., & Bolt, D. J. (1991). Effect of feeding calcium soaps to early postpartum dairy cows on plasma prostaglandin F, luteinizing hormone, and follicular growth. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(2), 483-489. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S00220302(91)78195-2Links ]

Marvéz, P. (2003). Rasgos climáticos de los llanos de Venezuela. In J. M. Hétier & R. Falcón López (Eds.), Tierras Llaneras de Venezuela (pp. 75-88). Institut de Recherche pour le Développment (IRD); Centro Interamericano de Desarrollo e Investigación Ambiental y Territorial (CIDIAT). https://core.ac.uk/reader/39844808Links ]

McQueen, R. E., & Nicholson, J. W. G. (1979). Modification of the neutral-detergent fiber procedure for cereals and vegetables by using alpha-amylase. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, 62(3), 676-680. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/62.3.676Links ]

Milford, R., & Minson, D. J. (1966). Intake of tropical pasture especies. In International Grassland Congress (Ed.), Proceedings of the IX International Grassland Congress, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 7 to 20 January, 1965 (pp. 815-822). Edições Alarico Limitada. [ Links ]

Minson, D. J. (1982). Effects of chemical and physical composition of herbage eaten upon intake. In J. B. Hacker (Ed.), Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures. Proceedings of an International Symposium held at St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, August 24th-28th, 1981 (pp. 167-182.). CABI Publishing. [ Links ]

Minson, D. J. (1983). Forage quality: Assessing the Plant-Animal complex. In J. A. Smith & V. W. Hays (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIV International Grassland Congress. Held at Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A. June 15-24, 1981 (pp. 23-29). Westview Press. [ Links ]

Minson, D. J. (1990). Forage mass. In T. Cunha (Ed.), Forage in Ruminant Nutrition (1st ed., pp. 67-89). Academy Press. [ Links ]

Mlay, P. S., Pereka, A., Phiri, E. C., Balthazary, S., Igusti, J., Hvelplund, T., Weisbjerg, R. M., & Madsen, J. (2006). Feed value of selected tropical grasses, legumes and concentrates. Veterinarski Arhiv, 76(1), 53-63. http://vetarhiv.vef.unizg.hr/papers/2006-76-1-6.pdfLinks ]

Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments (9th ed. ). Wiley. [ Links ]

Mora, R. E., Chicco, C. F., Herrera, A. M., Godoy, S., & Garmendia, J. (2014). Suplementación con fuentes de proteína degradable y no degradable en el rumen en vacas alimentadas con Urochloa humidicola. I. Cambios de peso vivo, condición corporal, preñez y química sanguínea en vacas Brahman de primer parto a pastoreo. Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia, 24(6), 563-576. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cientifica/article/view/19087Links ]

Mora, R. E., Chicco, C. F., Herrera, A. M., Godoy, S., & Garmendia, J. (2015). Suplementación con fuentes de proteína degradable y no degradable en el rumen en vacas alimentadas con Urochloa humidicola. II. Fermentación ruminal, degradación de materia orgánica y química sanguínea en vacas mestizas. Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia, 25(1), 63-73. [ Links ]

Mora, R., Herrera, A., Sánchez, D., Chicco, C., Godoy, S., & Depablos, L. (2010). Suplementación parenteral con cobre y zinc en vacunos machos mestizos Brahman en los Llanos Occidentales de Venezuela. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (UCV), 36(3), 83-94. http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_agro/article/view/10838/10570#Links ]

Moriel, P., Palmer, E., Vedovatto, M., Piccolo, M. B., Ranches, J., Silva, H. M., Mercadante, V. R. G., Lamb, G. C., & Vendramini, J. M. B. (2020). Supplementation frequency and amount modulate post-weaning growth and reproductive performance of Bos indicus-influenced beef heifers. Journal of Animal Ecology, 98(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa236Links ]

Nelson, D. L., & Cox, M. M. (2014). Princípios de Bioquimica de Lehinger (6.. Ed.). ARTMED EDITORA LTDA. [ Links ]

Ngu, N. T., Nhan, N. T. H., Hon, N. V., Anh, L. H., Thiet, N., & Hung, L. T. (2019). Effects of urea, soybean meal and blood and feather meal mixture on rumen characteristics and performance of Brahman crossbred cattle. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 31(6), 86. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd31/6/ntngu31086.htmlLinks ]

National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7th ed.). National Academy Press. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/9791Links ]

Ott, R. L., & Longnecker, M. (2010). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis (6th ed.). Brooks/Cole. [ Links ]

Pacheco, G. F. E., Pezzali, J. G., Kessler, A. M., & Trevizan, L. (2016). Inclusion of exogenous enzymes to feathers during processing on the digestible energy content of feather meal for adult dogs. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 45(6), 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000600002Links ]

Paladines, O. (1992). Medida de la producción primaria de los potreros bajo condiciones de pastoreo. In O. Paladines (Ed.), Metodologías de Pastizales para trabajar en fincas y proyectos de desarrollo agropecuario (Serie Metodológica, pp. 39-81). PROFOGAN, MAG/GTZ. [ Links ]

Palmquist, D. L., & Jenkins, T. C. (2017). A 100-Year Review: Fat feeding of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(12), 10061-10077. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12924Links ]

Parada, J. E., & Mora, R. E. (2019). Suplementación con bolos intra-ruminales de cobalto, cobre y selenio en novillas Brahman blanco en la región suroeste de Venezuela. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 31(9). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd31/9/robert31141.htmlLinks ]

Paula, C. C. L., Euclides, V. P. B., Montagner, D. B., Lempp, B., Difante, G. S., & Carloto, M. N. (2012). Estrutura do dossel, consumo e desempenho animal em pastos de capim-marandu sob lotação contínua. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 64(1), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000100024Links ]

Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classificatio. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(5), 1633-1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007Links ]

Purushothaman, S., Kumar, A., & Tiwari, D. P. (2008). Effect of feeding calcium salts of palm oil fatty acids on performance of lactating crossbred cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 21(3), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.60505Links ]

Queiroz, D. S., Casagrande, D. R., Moura, G. D. S., Silva, E. A., Viana, M. C., & Ruas, J. R. M. (2012). Espécies forrageiras para produção de leite em solos de várzea. Forage species for milk production in lowland soil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41(2), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1590/S151635982012000200006Links ]

Sawyer, J. E., Mulliniks, J. T., Waterman, R. C., & Petersen, M. K. (2012). Influence of protein type and level on nitrogen and forage use in cows consuming low-quality forage. Journal of Animal Science, 90(7), 2324-2330. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4782Links ]

Scholljegerdes, E. J., Weston, T. R., Ludden, P. A., & Hess, B. W. (2005). Supplementing a ruminally undegradable protein supplement to maintain essential amino acid supply to the small intestine when forage intake is restricted in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 83(9), 2151-2161. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.8392151xLinks ]

Sklan, D., Moallem, U., & Folman, Y. (1991). Effect of feeding calcium soaps of fatty acids on production and reproductive responses in high producing lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(2), 510-517. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78198-8Links ]

Spicer, L. J., & Francisco, C. C. (1998). Adipose obese gene product, leptin, inhibits bovine ovarian thecal cell steroidogenesis. Biology of Reproduction, 58(1), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.1.207Links ]

Staniak, M. (2016). The impact of drought stress on the yields and food value of selected forage grasses. Acta Agrobotanica, 69(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1663Links ]

Tiffany, T. O., Jansen, J. M., Burtis, C. A., Overton, J. B., & Scott, C. D. (1972). Enzymatic kinetic rate and end-point analyses of substrate, by use of a GeMSAEC fast analyzer. Clinical Chemistry, 18(8), 829-840. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/18.8.829Links ]

Trinder, P. (1969). Determination of glucose in blood using glucose oxidase with an alternative oxygen acceptor. Annals of Clinical Biochemestry, 6(1), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456326900600108Links ]

Van Houtert, M. F. J., Perdok, H. B., & Leng, R. A. (1990). Factors affecting food efficiency and body composition of growing ruminants offered straw-based diets: Supplementation with lipids with and without protein meal. Animal Science, 51(2), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000335610000547XLinks ]

Van Soest, P. J. (1973). Collaborative study of acid-detergent fiber and lignin. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 56(4), 781-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/56.4.781Links ]

Van Soest, P. J., & Wine, R. H. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 50(1), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/50.1.50Links ]

Wittwer, F. (2000). Diagnóstico dos desequilibrios metabólicos de energía en rebanhos bovinos. In F. H. D. González, J. O. Barcellos, H. Ospina, & L. A. O. Ribeiro (Eds.), Perfil metabólico em ruminantes: seu uso em nutrição e doenças nutricionais. (pp. 9-22). Gráfica da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.https://lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/26657/000274557.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yLinks ]

Yang, Y. T., Baldwin, R. L., & Garrett, W. N. (1978). Effects of dietary lipid supplementation on adipose tissue metabolism in lambs and steers. Journal of Animal Science, 47(3), 686-690). https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.473686xLinks ]

Received: June 12, 2020; Accepted: April 30, 2021

* Corresponding author: Universidad Nacional Experimental del Táchira, San Cristóbal, Venezuela. Avenida Universidad, Sector Paramillo. Edificio B, piso 3 Decanato de Investigación. robertmora78@yahoo.com

Disclaimers: The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest in carrying out this work.

Creative Commons License Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.