SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 issue1Cephalopoda (Mollusca) of the Colombian Caribbean Sea author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - INVEMAR

Print version ISSN 0122-9761

Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost. vol.50 no.1 Santa Marta Jan./June 2021  Epub Sep 19, 2021

https://doi.org/10.25268/bimc.invemar.2021.50.1.988 

NOTES

Ecological shallow water delimitation of the Serrana, Roncador, and Quitasueño Atolls of the Seaflower Biosphere Reserve in the Colombian Caribbean

Santiago Millán1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4082-937X

Carolina García-Valencia2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3824-3839

1Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-Invemar, Laboratorio de Servicios de Información (LabSIS), Santa Marta, Colombia

2Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-Invemar, Laboratorio de Servicios de Información (LabSIS), Santa Marta, Colombia carolina.garcia@invemar.org.co


ABSTRACT

In order to contribute to the sea bottoms knowledge of the Seaflower Biosphere Reserve (RB Seaflower), a mapping update was made at 1:50,000 scale of the Seascape Ecological Units (SEU) for the Serrana, Roncador and Quitasueño atolls, based on the processing and interpretation of ALOS AVNIR - 2 satellite images acquired in 2012. For the attribute assignation was used as reference cartographic products, fieldwork data, and ecological descriptions of the benthic community. A total of 138,967 ha and 30 SEU, which corresponds to 32,908 ha for Serrana, 4,861 to Roncador and 101,198 to Quitasueño. The products generated represents a good approximation of the location, extension and distribution of the benthic seascape elements, constituting the base line information for the management of these atolls, they are also part of the Continental, Coastal and Marine Ecosystem Map of Colombia at scale 1:100,000 (MEC 100K) and the Colombian Coral Areas Atlas (AACC) updated on a digital platform to 2020. However, more extensive field work is needed for cartographic purposes, which allows for greater spatial and thematic detail, and to evaluate cartographic reliability.

KEYWORDS: Marine atlas; Ecological units; Coral reefs; Cartography.

RESUMEN

Para contribuir al conocimiento de los fondos coralinos de la Reserva de Biosfera Seaflower (RB Seaflower), se realizó la actualización cartográfica a escala 1:50 000 de unidades ecológicas del paisaje (UEP) para los atolones de Serrana, Roncador y Quitasueño, basada en el procesamiento e interpretación de imágenes del sensor satelital ALOS AVNIR-2 en 2012. Para la asignación temática se utilizó como referencia productos cartográficos previos, información de campo y descripciones ecológicas de la comunidad bentónica. En total se delimitaron 138 967 ha y 30 UEP, de las cuales 32 908 ha corresponden a Serrana, 4 861 a Roncador y 101 198 a Quitasueño. Los productos generados representan una buena aproximación de la disposición, extensión y distribución de los elementos del paisaje bentónico, constituyéndose en información de línea base crucial para el manejo de estos atolones. Además, hacen parte del Mapa de Ecosistemas Continentales Costeros y Marinos de Colombia a escala 1:100 000 (MEC100K) y del Atlas de Áreas Coralinas de Colombia (AACC) actualizado en plataforma digital a 2020. Sin embargo, hace falta trabajo de campo más extenso con fines cartográficos, que permita mayor detalle espacial y temático, y evaluar la confiabilidad cartográfica.

PALABRAS CLAVES: Hábitats marinos; Unidades ecológicas; Arrecifes de coral; Cartografía.

The global degradation of coral reefs (Hughes et al., 2003), compromises the large number of ecosystem services that provide (Woodhead et al., 2019). To protect them, Seascape Ecological Units (SEU) cartography is a tool to guide restoration and conservation processes (Mumby, 2001). In Colombia, coral reef mapping began in the 1990s, including the Roncador and Serrana atolls (Díaz et al., 1996). Later, Díaz et al. (2000) presented the Colombia´s coral areas maps, which included almost all the RB Seaflower areas. Taking advantage of this product, Sánchez et al. (2005) presented modified cartographic squemes of Serrana, Roncador y Quitasueño; the first maps of Serranilla, Bajo Nuevo and Bajo Alicia were also produced (Invemar - ANH, 2012). Based on the availability of thematic information for the previously mentioned atolls, during the 2014 Seaflower Expedition, the registration of new biotic information in field was achieved, creating a data set that facilitated cartographic updates.

32 dives were made with Scuba equipment in the lagoon basins, backreefs, and fore reef terraces obtaining information derived from rapid ecological evaluation similar to that carried out by Díaz et al. (1995) and Garzón-Ferreira and Pinzón. (1999), discriminating scleractinian corals at species level in a 20 × 2 m band transect. Based on the types, highest percentages of biotic, substrate coverage, each SEU was determined, and the associated geomorphology. To fill information gaps due to the low number of points the Colombian coral areas atlas were used as reference (Díaz et al., 2000), and modifications from the aforementioned authors with cartographic schemes prepared by Sánchez et al. (2005), thus, the spatial position of each cartographic element through the ArcGIS 10.5 software was identified. General aspects of the Colombian Caribbean oceanic reef zoning were also consulted (Diaz et al., 1996; Díaz - Pulido et al., 2004), allowing a better interpretation of the information.

Before the cartographic edition, the digital image processing included atmospheric corrections through the “dark subtraction” tool on three satellite images of 2012, ALOS AVNIR - 2 sensors (one for each atoll), in where were observed contours up to 30 m deep. Geometric corrections were ruled out due to the absence of reference sites. However, the images show displacements of less than 10 m regarding the information taken in the field. Then each image was divided into three zones (lagoon basin, backreef, and fore reef terraces), as recommends from Andréfouёt and Guzmán (2005). In each zone were made band combinations to create true color compositions and principal component analysis using the blue and green bands, obtaining three components that were visualized with different order and selecting the combination that show the differentiation of predominantly coral cover. This analysis detects and transforms the image variability set of bands or components which explain the maximum of variability but maintaining the significant information (Chuvieco, 1996).

As a reference, the existing cartography mentioned previously was used (Díaz et al., 2000 y Sánchez et al., 2005), confronting it´s correspondence with what was observed in the satellite images, making new assignments when the field information demonstrated it. Besides, the thematic attributes associated using visual interpretation criteria such as texture, tone, and color in true color composition and principal components already described, which allowed assigning levels of uncertainty per polygon on the presence of each unit.

As a result, two cartographic layers were updated, one geomorphological and other biotic, and then rename according to the classification of Díaz et al. (2000). The final step consisted of the cartographic union of these layers, and the concatenation of the respective legends (biotic and geomorphological) generating a layer of SEU. For the assignment of the geomorphological units, the most outstanding features of the landscape were named taking into account the geomorphological classification scheme contained in Díaz et al. (2000) discriminating three zones: 1. Fore reef terraces, 2. Crest and 3. Lagoon basin; two types: 1. Patch reef (located in the lagoon basin) and 2. peripheral patch reef (located at the leeward side of the periphery of lagoon basin). Allowing to differentiate the biotic units by their location with respect to the reef geomorphology. A total 138,967 ha was delimited and 30 SEU based on 7 geomorphological units and 12 biotic units.

The Serrana atoll, despite corresponding to less than a third of the Quitasueño size with 32,908 ha, its reef crest that is part of the peripheral reef with a length of 56 km, and its lagoon basin with 24,883 ha, are the largest in Colombia, However, it represents only 12 SEU, the smallest number of the three atolls (Figure 1). Roncador, despite being the smallest of the three atolls with 4,861 ha, 13 km in length with a northwest - southeast orientation, 6 km in its widest portion and a 12.8 km long reef crest being part of the peripheral reef, represented 15 SEU. This atoll is characterized by having the lagoon basin with the highest relative coverage of coral formations in Colombia (Figure 2). Quitasueño, the largest coral area in Colombia with 101,198 ha, it extends for 63 km in its longest portion with north - south orientation and 24 km in its widest portion. It´s characterized by having a large for reef terrace, with dominance of coral formations towards the center, and large extensions of octocorals and sponges towards the south and north. In Quitasueño the largest number of SEU was identified for a total of 21, furthermore, its reef crest is the second largest in the country with a 43 km length (Figure 3).

Figure 1 SEU map of the Serrana Atoll in the colombian Caribbean. 

Figure 2 SEU map of the Roncador Atoll in the colombian Caribbean. 

Figure 3 SEU map of the Quitasueño Atoll in the colombian Caribbean 

Regarding the previous cartography (Díaz et al., 2000), the main differences can be seen in the lagoon basins detail level, which is higher in the aforementioned authors, but the scale is unknown; geometric distortions and displacements were also corrected and new elements of the background were delimited, mainly in Quitasueño.

The most notable change is the restriction of the SEU Arena - Coral debris to the lagoon terraces, since the soft bottoms of the other zones seems to correspond to descriptions of bioturbed sediments - calcareous algae of Diaz et al. (2000), likewise, their representation in the deep zones was improved with respect to the mentioned authors. The most notable difference is appreciated in Quitasueño with the SEU Octocorals - Sponges, at depths between 20 and 30 m in the fore reef terrace, it is similar to the so-called Macroalgae meadows - Octocorals - Sponges in Serranilla bank and bajo Alicia registered in 2012 (Invemar and ANH, 2012), but in this case macroalgae are not mentioned because despite being common in coral reefs (McCook, 1996; Knowlton, 2004), and become increasingly dominant in recent decades including remote coral reefs (Bruno y Valdivia, 2916), its dominance can occur seasonally (Díaz-Pulido and Garzón-Ferreira, 2002). Another notable SEU for not being previously represented in Quitasueño is Octocorals - Mixed corals located in the pre-reef terraces, which coincides with the descriptions of Sánchez et al. (2005). Regarding the SEU that build coral reefs or with hermatypic coral dominance, they cover about 29,000 ha representing about 21 % of the three atolls, where the most relevant are Octocorals - Mixed corals and Orbicella spp. The change in these proportions with respect to Díaz et al. (2000) is almost the same in Roncador, in Serrana the difference is barely 3 % in favor of soft bottoms, but Quitasueño is notably different, since the SEUs that form coral reefs are considerably higher in Díaz et al. (2000) where the mixed corals approach 40,000 ha, but in the present publication they only add up to 1,637; these differences may be due to the low capacity to detect the seabeds at that time, especially those corresponding to the deep areas of the fore reef terraces. The relationship between SEU forming coral reefs was inversely proportional to the atoll size. Quitasueño presents 18 %, Serrana 27 % and Roncador, which is about 21 times smaller than Quitasueño, presents 59 %; it is necessary to know if this behavior is a generality of the complex oceanic reefs of the Caribbean.

It is pertinent to mention that the SEU represented by Díaz et al. (2000) and Sánchez et al. (2005) as Acropora cervicornis was not identified in the field, which, if it persists, is presumed in scattered patches smaller than the scale of the present case. Also, the unit Acropora palmata - Pseudodiploria spp., it is represented in smaller proportions than those reported by the aforementioned authors. However, in several places eroded skeletons of these two species can be seen, vestiges of a past where they were more common, which is consistent with the decrease in the coverage of these species due to the mortality episodes reported throughout the Caribbean in the late 1980s (Aronson and Pretch, 2001).

In conclusion, a good approximation of the extension and distribution of the benthic seascape elements was achieved of an available product for consultation in MEC100K (Ideam et al., 2015) and AACC (Invemar - Minambiente, 2020). However, the need to carry out extensive field work and specifically oriented to the generation of thematic cartography to update the information at a more detailed scale and validate it persists, since the scientific need for updated, spatialized and thematic information that leads to identifying and delimiting SEU to the maximum level of detail is still in force.

ACKNOWLEGMENTS

The authors thanks Invemar, the Centro de Investigaciones Oceanográficas e Hidrográficas (CIOH) and the Dirección General Marítima (Dimar) for sponsoring the development of this study. Likewise, to Professor Adolfo Sanjuan Muñoz for his accompaniment in the field, and the PhDs Juan Manuel Díaz and Sven Zea for their comments and discussion on the distribution of biotic and geomorphological units.

BIBLIOGRAFÍA / LITERATURE CITED

Andréfouёt. S and H. Guzmán. 2005. Coral reef distribution, status and geomorphology -biodiversity relationship in Kuna Yala (San Blas) archipelago Caribbean Panamá. Coral Reefs, 24: 31-42. [ Links ]

Aronson, R. and W. Precht. 2001. White-band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hidrobiología, 460: 25-38. [ Links ]

Bruno, J. and A. Valdivia. 2016. Coral reef degradation is not correlated with local human population density. Scientific Reports, 6: 29778. [ Links ]

Chuvieco, E. 1996. Fundamentos de teledetección espacial. Ed. Rialp, Madrid. 576 p. [ Links ]

Díaz-Pulido. J, J. Sánchez, S. Zea, J. Díaz, J. Garzón-Ferreira. 2004. Esquemas de distribución espacial de la comunidad bentónica de Arrecifes coralinos continentales y oceánicos del Caribe colombiano. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc., 28: 337- 347. [ Links ]

Díaz, J.M., J. Garzón-Ferreira y S. Zea. 1995. Los arrecifes coralinos de la isla de San Andrés, Colombia: Estado actual y perspectivas para su conservación. Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Bogotá. 150 p. [ Links ]

Díaz, J.M., G. Díaz-Pulido, J. Garzón-Ferreira, J. Geister, J.A. Sánchez y S. Zea. 1996. Atlas de los arrecifes coralinos del Caribe colombiano. Tomo I. Complejos Arrecifales Oceánicos. Invemar, Serie Publicaciones Especiales 2. Santa Marta. 83 p. [ Links ]

Díaz, J.M., L. Barrios, M. Cendales, J. Garzón-Ferreira, J. Geister, M. López-Victoria, G. Ospina, F. Parra-Velandia, J. Pinzón, B. Vargas-Ángel, F. Zapata y S. Zea. 2000. Áreas coralinas de Colombia. Invemar, Serie de publicaciones especiales No. 5, Santa Marta. 175 p. [ Links ]

Garzón - Ferreira. J y J. Pinzón. 1999. Evaluación rápida de estructura y salud de las formaciones coralinas de la Isla Malpelo (Pacífico colombiano). Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost., 28: 137-154. [ Links ]

Hughes, T., J. Kerry, M. Álvarez-Noriega, J. Álvarez Romero, K. Anderson, A. Baird, R. Babcock, M. Beger, D. Bellwood, R. Berkelmans, T. Bridge, I. Butler, M. Byrne, N. Cantin, S. Comeau, S. Connolly, G. Cumming, S. Dalton, G. Diaz-Pulido, C. Eakin, W. Figueira, J. Gilmour, H. Harrison, S. Heron, A. Hoey, J.-P. Hobbs, M. Hoogenboom, E. Kennedy, C.-Y. Kuo, J. Lough, R. Lowe, G. Liu, M. McCulloch, M. McWilliam, J. Pandolfi, R. Pears, M. Pratchett, V. Schoepf, V. Simpson, T. Skirving, W. Sommer, B. Torda, G. Wachenfeld, D.B. Willis and S. Wilson. 2017. Globalwarming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature, 15: 373-377. [ Links ]

Hughes, T., A. Baird, D. Bellwood, M. Card, S. Connolly, C. Folke and J. Lough. 2003. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 301: 929-933. [ Links ]

Ideam, MADS, IAvH, Invemar, IIAP, Sinchi, PNNC e IGAC. 2015. Mapa de ecosistemas continentales, costeros y marinos de Colombia. Versión 1.0 a escala 1:100000. [ Links ]

Invemar-ANH. 2012. Línea base ambiental en el Área de Régimen Común Jamaica - Colombia como aporte al aprovechamiento sostenible de los recursos marinos compartidos. 113 p. [ Links ]

Invemar - Minambiente. 2020. Convenio interadministrativo Invemar - Minambiente CI-521 de 2020. Actividad: Actualización del Atlas de Áreas Coralinas de Colombia Fase II. Actualmente en curso. [ Links ]

Knowlton, N. 2004. Multiple “stable” states and the conservation of marine ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr., 60: 387-396. [ Links ]

McCook, L. 1996. Effects of herbivores and water quality on Sargassum distribution on the Central Great Barrier Reef: cross - shelf transplants. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 139: 179-92. [ Links ]

Mumby, P. 2001. Beta and habitat diversity in marine systems: a new approach to measurement, scaling and interpretation. Oecología, 128: 274-280. [ Links ]

Sánchez. J.A., V. Pizarro, A. Acosta de Sanchez , P. Castillo, P. Herron, J. Martínez, P. Montoya y C. Orozco. 2005. Evaluating coral reef benthic communities in remote Caribbean Atolls (Quitasueño, Serrana and Roncador Banks) to recommend marine-protected areas for the Seaflower biosphere Biosphere Reserve. Atoll Res. Bull., 531: 1-65. [ Links ]

Woodhead, A. , C. Hicks, A. Norström, G. Williams & N. Graham. 2019. Coral reef ecosystem services in the Anthropocene. Funct. Ecol., 33: 1023-1034. [ Links ]

Received: February 03, 2020; Accepted: February 24, 2021

*Autor de correspondencia: santiago.millan@invemar.org.co

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License