SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 suppl.1Caracterización de radionúclidos en los sedimentos marinos del monte submarino Orca, bahía Almirantazgo y ensenada MackellarFlujos de sedimento glaciomarino en pequeñas bahías de la costa de Danco, península Antártica índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - INVEMAR

versión impresa ISSN 0122-9761

Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost. vol.50  supl.1 Santa Marta dic. 2021  Epub 13-Dic-2021

https://doi.org/10.25268/bimc.invemar.2021.50.suplesp.972 

Research Articles

Epipelagic euphausiids assemblage in the Gerlache Strait (Antarctic Peninsula) during January 2015

Marisol Rivera-Gómez1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-7180

Alan Giraldo2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-888X

Diego F. Mojica-Moncada3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-7527

1Universidad del Valle, Departamento de Biología, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Oceanográficas, Cali, Colombia. marisol.rivera.gomez@correounivalle.edu.co

2Universidad del Valle, Departamento de Biología, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Oceanográficas, Cali, Colombia. alan.giraldo@correounivalle.edu.co

3Centro de Investigaciones Oceanográficas e Hidrográficas, Dirección General Marítima. Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. dmojica@dimar.mil.co


ABSTRACT

The spatial distribution of the epipelagic Euphausiids was investigated during the first Colombian Scientific Expedition to Antarctica -Expedición Caldas- in the Gerlache Strait during the austral summer of 2015. Surface zooplankton was collected at 20 oceanographic stations with a simple conical net of 0.6 m in diameter mouth and 200 µm of mesh net. Four euphausiid species were collected in 70 % of the sampling stations: Euphausia crystallorophias Holt and Tattersall 1906, Euphausia superba Dana 1850, Thysanoessa sp. and Thysanoessa macrura Sars 1883. Euphausia crystallorophias was the most abundant species with maximum density of 818 ind 1000 m-3 associated with the entrance of the Wilhelmina Bay, in the central area of the Gerlache Strait. The northern and southern sectors of the strait had significant differences in surface temperature and salinity associated with significant differences in the composition of the euphausiid species assemblages between both sectors. Although E. crystallorophias was the numerically dominant euphausiid species in the Gerlache Strait, E. superba was mostly distributed in the northern sector while Thysanoessa sp. was only distributed in the southern sector.

KEYWORDS: Euphausiacea; Temperature; Salinity; Antarctic Ocean; Austral summer.

RESUMEN

La distribución espacial de los eufáusidos en la zona epipelágica del estrecho Gerlache, Antártica capturados durante el verano austral de 2015, fue investigada durante la “Expedición Caldas”, primera expedición científica de Colombia a la Antártica. En 20 estaciones de muestreo oceanográfico se realizaron arrastres superficiales para recolectar zooplancton utilizando una red cónica simple de 0,6 m de diámetro y 200 µm de luz de malla. Cuatro especies de eufáusidos fueron recolectados en 70 % de las estaciones: Euphausia crystallorophias Holt y Tattersall 1906, Euphausia superba Dana 1850, Thysanoessa sp. y Thysanoessa macrura Sars 1883. La especie más abundante fue E. crystallorophias con abundancia máxima de 818 ind 1000 m-3 asociada a la entrada de la bahía Wilhelmina, en la zona central del estrecho Gerlache. Los sectores norte y sur del estrecho mostraron diferencias significativas en la temperatura y salinidad superficial y variaciones en la composición de los conjuntos de eufáusidos entre estos dos sectores. Aunque, E. crystallorophias fue la especie numéricamente dominante en todo el estrecho Gerlache, E. superba se distribuyó principalmente en el sector norte mientras que Thysanoessa sp. sólo en el sur.

PALABRAS CLAVE: Euphausiacea; Kril antártico; Temperatura; Salinidad; Verano austral.

INTRODUCTION

Euphausiids are exclusively marine crustaceans that feed on particulate matter, phytoplankton and microzooplankton (Cleary et al. 2018; Kohlbach et al. 2019). Some of the species that make up this taxonomic group fulfill a relevant ecological function in the Antarctic pelagic food web because they are prey for fish (Hudson et al., 2014), seabirds (Rogers et al., 2012; Rombolá et al., 2012; Santora et al., 2017), sea lions (Yamanaka, 1983) and Balaenopteridae whales (Stone and Hamner, 1988; Nowacek et al., 2011; Murase et al., 2002), shortening the energy transfer process from primary production to higher trophic levels. Also, these organisms make large vertical displacements in the water column, for which they are considered key elements in the biological pump and even a fundamental element in the benthopelagic coupling process in the Antarctic region (Schmidt et al., 2011; Conroy et al., 2020).

In the Antarctic Peninsula, euphausiids in their larval and juvenile stages together with copepods and salps are one of the three main groups that make up zooplankton (Schnack-Schiel and Mujica, 1994), although some species of euphausiids during their adult stage are considered micronektonic organisms. This is a taxonomic group that has been widely studied in the Antarctic region, particularly Euphausia superba due to its high abundance in the area (Piatkowski, 1985; Hosie et al., 1988; Cavan et al., 2019). For the Gerlache Strait, knowledge of euphausiids includes geographical distribution, vertical migratory behavior, population size structure (Nordhausen, 1994a; Zhou et al. 1994; Lawson et al. 2008; Wiebe et al. 2011; Cleary et al. 2016), herbivore and respiration metabolic rates, their contribution to carbon flux (Huntley and Brinton, 1991; Hernández-León et al. 2000; 2001; 2013; Reiss et al. 2017) as well as the relationship between the rates of recruitment and abundance with ENSO events of origin in the tropical Pacific (Loeb et al. 2009).

The Gerlache Strait, located in the northwestern part of the Antarctic Peninsula, presents geomorphology and bathymetry that promotes the development of particular circulation patterns in the north and south, which result in different hydrographic conditions (Rodríguez et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2002; 2006; Torres-Parra et al., 2020). Considering that the conditions of temperature and salinity largely determine the structure and composition of the planktonic community in a locality (Rodríguez et al., 2002; Leonori et al., 2017), it is expected that the species that make up the set of Epipelagic euphausiids in the Gerlache Strait exhibit a particular trend of spatial variation, which would be related to the thermal and saline conditions of each sector of the Strait, in such a way that the structure of the set of euphausiids will be different between these sectors.

To test this hypothesis, aspects related to the spatial ecology of the set of epipelagic euphausiids in the Gerlache Strait were evaluated during the austral summer of 2015 within the framework of the first scientific expedition from Colombia to the Antarctic - ”Caldas Expedition”, addressing the following research questions: 1. Is the taxonomic composition of the group of euphausiids present in the epipelagic zone in the north and south of the Gerlache Strait similar? and 2. Is the spatial distribution of the abundance of euphausiids homogeneous in the epipelagic zone of the Gerlache Strait during the study period?

STUDY AREA

The Gerlache Strait is located in the northwestern sector of the Antarctic Peninsula, delimited by the Palmer Archipelago in which two island formations stand out, the islands of Antwerp and Brabant (Figure 1).

Figure 1.Position of the sampling stations in the Gerlache Strait in the Antarctic Peninsula. 

The strait is 180 km long and between 8 and 60 km wide, with a depth of 300 m in the extreme south and 1000 m in the extreme north (García et al., 2002). The surface circulation in the Gerlache Strait flows to the northeast with velocities greater than 30 cm s-1 feeding the Bransfield Strait Current (Zhou et al., 2002). A dynamic coastal anticyclonic gyre system develops in this region due to a large number of shallow bays along the strait (Zhou et al., 2002). During the austral summer of 2015, the thermal and saline structure in the superficial part of the water column showed different conditions in each of the entrances to the strait, at the entrance to the north, thermal stratification conditions prevailed with homogeneous salinity, while the South entrance showed greater mixing and low salinity in the first 30 m (Giraldo et al., 2019; Torres-Parra et al., 2020).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The zooplankton samples were obtained during the Caldas Expedition aboard the ship “ARC 20 de Julio” of the Colombian National Navy. Sampling was carried out from January 17 to 22, 2015, at 20 oceanographic stations (Figure 1). Continuous vertical recording of temperature, conductivity, and depth was performed at each station using a Seabird® CTD profiler (SBE 19plus SeaCat profiler CTD and SBE 25plus Sealogger CTD). The horizontal distribution of temperature and salinity was analyzed at standard depths (1, 10, 50, and 100 m) to infer the thermohaline conditions in the study area, using the kriging interpolation method of the Surfer® program.

Surface tows were made to collect zooplankton at each sampling station using a simple conical net of 0.6 m in diameter and 200 µm mesh with a Hydrobios® flowmeter installed in the center of the mouth, to estimate the volume of filtered water. The samples were fixed in formalin at a 4 % concentration, buffered with saturated sodium borate. All tows were carried out under daylight conditions. The samples were labeled and analyzed in the laboratory of the Research group in Oceanographic Sciences of the Universidad del Valle. In the laboratory, the sample was divided into four equal parts using a Motoda-type plankton subsampler, ¼ of the zooplankton sample was used to estimate the dry biomass. From the remaining – fraction, the euphausiids were separated, identified, counted, and classified by stage of development, following the taxonomic keys of Antezana et al. (1976), Baker et al. (1990), Gibbons et al. (1999) and Brinton et al. (2000). All counts were standardized (individuals 1000 m-3) based on the volume of filtered water.

To quantify the dry biomass of the zooplankton from each sampling station, the constant dry weight method was used (Postel et al., 2000), concentrating the sample on a previously dried and weighed cellulose filter, being brought to constant weight in an oven at 60 ° C for 24 h, to be subsequently weighed on a 0.0001 g precision analytical balance. Weight records were multiplied by 1.25 to adjust for tissue loss in formaldehyde (Hopkins, 1971). To quantify the biomass contribution of the different species of euphausiids identified in the study area, the average weight of the adult individuals of each species (excluding juveniles) was established and multiplied by their abundance, establishing the contribution percentage of each species to the total biomass of zooplankton.

The analysis of the conditions of temperature, salinity, and the set of euphausiids in the North and South sectors of the strait was carried out as comparison units according to the geomorphological and oceanographic characterization described by Zhou et al. (2002) and Giraldo et al. (2019). T-student tests were carried out after checking the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances with the data transformed with the box-cox transformation to establish whether there were differences between temperature and salinity in the North and South sectors of the Gerlache Strait. To evaluate differences in the abundance of euphausiids between the two sectors of the Strait, a non-parametric Mann-Whitney analysis was carried out, and a non-parametric Spearman correlation analysis was carried out to evaluate the correlation between the abundance of euphausiids as a function of temperature. and salinity at the evaluated depths. These statistical analyzes were performed with Statistica 7.

A multidimensional non-metric scaling analysis (nMDS) was carried out from a similarity matrix established with the Bray Curtis algorithm, to infer the spatial variation of the set of euphausiids comparing the North and South sectors. Also, the difference between the sets was evaluated using a Similarity analysis (Anosim) and the contribution of each species to the similarity of the sets of each sector and the dissimilarity between the sectors of the strait was established using a percentage similarity analysis (SIMPER) (Clarke, 1993; Clarke and Ainsworth, 1993; Clarke and Warwick, 1994; 2001). All community analyzes were conducted using the Primer 6 program (Clarke and Gorley, 2006).

RESULTS

The temperature of the first 100 m of depth had significant differences between the North and South sectors of the strait (Table 1). The superficial stratum and at 10 m depth of the North sector presented higher temperature values than the South sector, while between 50 - 100 m depth the temperature was lower in the North sector (Figure 2). Salinity was homogeneous in both sectors for most depths except in the superficial stratum where the lowest salinities were recorded in the eastern region of the North sector (Figure 3). The salinity at 1 m depth was significantly different between the North and South sectors (Table 1).

Figure 2 Distribution of sea temperature at depths of 1, 10, 50, and 100 m during the austral summer of 2015 in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. 

Figure 3 Salinity distribution at depths 1, 10, 50, and 100 m during the austral summer of 2015 in the Gerlache Strait, Peninsula, Antarctica. 

Table 1 T-tests to contrast differences between temperature (° C) and salinity (UPS) between the northern and southern sectors of the Gerlache Strait during the austral summer of 2015. 

The highest concentrations of zooplankton biomass were recorded at the entrance to Wilhelmina Bay (station 12 = 2246.87 mg 100 m-3) and between Lion Island and Antwerp Island (station 17 = 1194.50 mg 100 m-3) (Figure 4). The concentration of zooplankton biomass was between one to two orders of magnitude lower in the rest of the study area (5.32 - 697.24 mg 100 m-3) (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Distribution of zooplankton biomass (mg 100 m-3) estimated during the Austral summer of 2015 in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. 

Euphausiids were captured in 70 % of the sampling stations, identifying four species: Euphausia crystallorophias Holt and Tattersall 1906 (79.7 %), Euphausia superba Dana 1850 (11.4 %), Thysanoessa sp. (7.6 %), and Thysanoessa macrura Sars 1883 (1.3 %). The highest abundance of euphausiids was E. crystallorophias recorded at station 12 at the entrance to Wilhelmina Bay (818 ind 1000 m-3) (Figures 5 and 6). All the individuals present in the samples corresponded to juveniles, males, and females. The larvae were not captured. The male-female ratio of E. crystallorophias was 48.5 % males and 51.5 % females, for E. superba 68.7 % males and 31.3 % females, for Thysanoessa sp. 65.3 % males and 34.7 % females, and T. macrura all individuals were female.

Figure 5 A. Photographs of the species collected. B. Distribution of the total abundance of euphausiids (ind 1000 m-3) during the austral summer of 2015 in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. 

Figure 6 Distribution of the abundance of euphausiids by species (ind 1000 m-3) during the austral summer of 2015 in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. 

The abundance of the species did not have statistically significant differences between the North and South sectors (Mann-Whitney, U = 749, p = 0.852). However, E. crystallorophias was more abundant at station 12 located in the North sector. Furthermore, the catches of E. superba were made mainly in the North sector while the species of the genus Thysanoessa were almost exclusively recorded in the South sector, except for station 12 (Figure 6). No significant relationship was found between the abundance of any of the species with temperature or salinity, except E. superba positively correlated with surface temperature (R = 0.57, p < 0.05) and 10 m depth (R = 0.64, p < 0.05).

Euphausia crystallorophias had a contribution of zooplankton biomass equivalent to 32.1 %, E. superba 12.7 %, T. macrura 0.4 %, and Thysanoessa sp. 0.3 %. Regarding the North and South sectors, E. crystallorophias represented 50.1 % of the zooplankton biomass in the North sector and 6.7 % in the South sector. Euphausia superba represented 20.2 % in the North sector and 2.1 % in the South sector. Thysanoessa sp. it represented 0.2 % in the North sector and 0.4 % in the South sector. T. macrura was only recorded in the southern sector of the Gerlache Strait, representing 0.9 % of the zooplankton biomass.

The group of euphausiid species in the Gerlache Strait showed two significantly different groups (Anosim, R = 0.52, p = 0.005), one group made up of most of the stations in the southern sector of the strait and the other with the stations of the North sector (Figure 7). For the two-dimensional solution obtained by the nMDS, the Spearman correlations were only high and positive between the temperature at 1 and 10 m and axis 1 (Table 2). The Simper analysis suggested that the dissimilarity between the North and South sectors was 89.19 %. Euphausia superba (41.0 %), E. crystallorophias (32.4 %), and Thysanoessa sp. (24.6 %) were the species that contributed most of the dissimilarity between the sectors, while E. superba was the species that most contributed to the similarity of the North sector (99.8 %) and Thysanoessa sp. the one that had the greatest contribution to the similarity of the South sector (89.7 %).

Figure 7 Multidimensional non-metric analysis using the Bray Curtis algorithm, based on the abundance matrix of euphausiid species recorded during the southern summer of 2015 in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. 

Table 2 Spearman correlations between the axes of the multidimensional non-metric analysis and the physical parameters, during the Austral summer of 2015 in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. 

DISCUSSION

Four species of euphausiids were recorded in the epipelagic zone of the Gerlache Strait during the austral summer of 2015. This low specific richness coincides with previous studies in Bahía Margarita, south of the Gerlache Strait (Marrari et al., 2011; Parker et al., 2011), where they reported T. macrura, E. crystallorophias, and E. superba. For the Scottish Sea, Ward et al. (2004) recorded E. superba, T. macrura, and T. vicina, species that had previously been reported for the Gerlache Strait during winter (Nordhause 1994a).

In Antarctic neritic waters, Euphausia crystallorophias is the most common euphausiid species (Mauchline and Fisher, 1969; Thomas and Green 1988; Pakhomov and Perissinotto 1996; Sala et al., 2002; La et al., 2015). This is a species with a broad feeding spectrum, including diatoms, bacteria, organic debris, and algae that grow under ice (Mauchline and Fisher, 1969; Pachamov and Perissinotto, 1996; Melnikov and Spiridonov, 1996; Ju and Harvey, 2004; Lee et al., 2013) and that reaches average densities between 450 to 1400 ind 100 m-3 (Everson, 1987; Pakhomov et al., 1998). The highest abundance of E. crystallorophias in the summer of 2015 was 818 ind 1000 m-3 in the central area of the Gerlache Strait, being the species that dominated in number and biomass contribution the set of euphausiids in the study area, similar to as reported by Daly and Zimmerman (2004) and Marrari et al., (2011) for the western sector of the Antarctic Peninsula. Furthermore, the abundance recorded in the present study was greater than that which had been reported for the neritic zone of the Bellingshausen Sea (Margarita Bay) by Siegel and Harm (1996).

Euphausia superba is perhaps the most widely studied euphausiid species in the world (Nicol, 2006; Siegel, 2016). This species is endemic to the Antarctic Ocean, not only is it the largest euphausiid (adults: 42-65 mm) or the most abundant in the Antarctic Ocean, but it is also a key species in the biogeochemical flow of carbon and iron and the trophic dynamics of the Antarctic pelagic ecosystem (Everson, 2000; Nowacek et al., 2011; Gleiber et al., 2012; Trathan and Hill, 2016; Schmidt et al., 2016). E. superba has sustained extensive international fishing activity for 50 years (Nicole et al., 2012; Nicole and Foster, 2016). Although this species mainly inhabits the Antarctic oceanic environment (Siegel and Watkins, 2016), the Gerlache Strait has been reported as one of the most abundant areas in the Antarctic peninsula (Huntley and Brinton, 1991), probably associated with the circulation pattern local that favors the residence time of the larvae in a protected environment with high productivity (Varela et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2002, 2006; Jiang et al., 2013), as has also been reported in the Strait of Bransfield (Hofmann and Murphy, 2004). However, most of the large swarms of E. superba are distributed in oceanic waters, approaching coastal areas during the summer (Atkinson et al., 2008; Tarling et al., 2009).

Thysanoessa macrura is the euphausiid species with the most consistency in its spatial distribution in the Antarctic Ocean, and it can outnumber E. superba swarms (Kittel and Stepnik, 1983; Daly and Macaulay, 1988; Nordhausen et al., 1994a). Thysanoessa macrura performs short vertical migrations in the day-night cycle, concentrating in the epipelagic zone of the water column (Loeb and Shulenberger, 1987; Lancraft et al., 1989; Nordhausen, 1992), in the Gerlache Strait this species has been reported at depths up to 120 m (Nordhausen et al., 1994b).

Around 60 degrees south Thysanoessa vicina and T. macrura show an overlap in the geographic distribution range, so it is possible that the type of Thysanoessa sp. recorded in this study corresponds to one of these two species considering that they are morphologically similar, and their traditional taxonomic identification depends on diagnostic characters such as the body size of adults, which for T. vicina is approximately 16 mm and for T. macrura it is about 30 mm. According to Thiriot-Quiévreux et al. (1998), these species have a different number of chromosomes, so it is recommended to implement karyotype analysis to establish with total certainty the potential presence of T. vicina in the Gerlache Strait.

In the present study, no larvae of any species were captured. T. macrura spawns at the end of winter and by the summer season the individuals will already correspond to juveniles (Wallis et al., 2018). However, E. crystallorophias and E. superba have the spawning season during the summer (Zhou et al., 2002), so the absence of initial stages of development of these two species during the sampling period may be a consequence of atypical climatic conditions registered in the Antarctic Peninsula during the first semester of 2015, which delayed the entry of conditions characteristic of summer in the region (Blunden and Arndt, 2016).

The sex ratios recorded in the present study were different for each of the species. In the case of E. superba, it has been reported that males grow faster than females (Kawaguchi et al., 2007), which could explain the higher rate of males compared to females registered in this study. For E. crystallorophias the sex ratio was close to 1, which coincides with that recorded by Pakhomov and Perissinoto (1996), who reported this same ratio for this species in different neritic environments of the Antarctic continent during summer. For T. macrura, only females were recorded, possibly due to the few individuals that were captured of this species. For this species dominance of females has been reported, reaching up to 75 % of the adult population during summer (Nordhausen, 1992; Haraldsson and Siegel, 2014).

Few studies have specifically shown a relationship between temperature or salinity and the abundance of euphausiids in Antarctica (Weber et al., 1986; Trathan et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2013 Leonori et al., 2017). On a spatial scale of 1 - 100 km, euphausiid aggregations may depend on local bathymetric conditions, for example, in areas such as the continental slope or within the Gerlache Strait, the highest concentrations of euphausiids will be the result of the effect of the topographic characteristics added to the local circulation pattern that favors local retention processes (Zhou et al., 2002, 2006; Jiang et al., 2013). This could be one of the reasons why the highest abundances of euphausiids were recorded in station 12 of the present study, due to their location in a protected area and with low speed in the currents that form in the area (Zhou et al., 2002; Torres-Parra et al., 2020).

The thermohaline conditions in the epipelagic zone of the Gerlache Strait during the austral summer of 2015 were similar to those reported during the austral summer of 1995 (Rodríguez et al., 2002), with higher temperatures in the stratum of 1 - 10 m than in the 50-100 m stratum, while in the southern sector the temperature was similar in the first 100 m depth. The low surface salinity recorded in the northern sector of the Gerlache Strait, particularly near Charlotte Bay and Hughes Bay of the northern sector of the Danco coast, is probably due to the contribution of meltwater, a condition that is frequent during the austral summer in the coastal areas of the Antarctic continent (Smith and Klinck, 2002; Eveleth et al. 2017), although the climatic conditions during the sampling period promoted conditions of low thaw rate (Blunden and Arndt, 2016).

The distinction of the set of epipelagic euphausiids in the two sectors of the Gerlache Strait could be influenced by different trophic resources in each sector. Changes in temperature and salinity in the water column can have important effects on the dominant type of phytoplankton (Mendes et al., 2018). Rodríguez et al., (2002) reported that the southern sector of the Gerlache Strait was dominated by ultraflagellates while in the northern sector it was dominated by microplanktonic diatoms. Likewise, Giraldo et al. (2019), reported differences in the size of the copepods present in the northern and southern sectors of the strait, with adult copepods in the northern sector being an order of magnitude smaller than those in the southern sector of the Gerlache Strait. This condition could be modulating the structure and composition of the group of euphausiids in this locality, considering also that E. superba has presented a preference for small copepods (Atkinson and Snÿder, 1997), which could explain the exclusive presence of this species in the North sector of the Gerlache Strait

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

To Melissa Moreno, Isabel Cristina Calle, Andrés Cuellar, and Juan José Gallego for their support in the separation of biological samples. To the crew of the ship “ARC 20 de Julio” for their valuable collaboration during the development of the sampling. Special thanks to Vice Admiral Juan Manuel Soltau Ospina, General Maritime Director. This work was co-financed by the Colombian Antarctic Program, the National Navy of the Republic of Colombia, the General Maritime Directorate, the Colombian Ocean Commission, the Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, the Universidad del Valle and the Young Researchers and Innovators Program of Colciencias call 706-2015 of which the first author was the beneficiary.

BIBLIOGRAFÍA / LITERATURE CITED

Antezana, T., N. Aguirre y R. Bustamante. 1976. Clave ilustrada y distribución latitudinal de los eufáusidos del océano Antártico (Crustacea, Zooplancton). Ser Cient. Inst. Antárt. Chil., 4: 53-68. [ Links ]

Atkinson, A. and R. Snÿder, 1997. Krill-copepod interactions at South Georgia, Antarctica, I. Omnivory by Euphausia superba. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 160: 63-76. [ Links ]

Atkinson. A., V. Siegel, E.A. Pakhomov, P. Rothery, V. Loeb, R.M. Ross, L.B. Quetin, K. Schmidt, P. Fretwell, E.J. Murphy, G.A. Tarling and A.H. Fleming. 2008. Oceanic circumpolar habitats of Antarctic krill. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 362: 1-23 [ Links ]

Baker, A. de C., B.P. Boden and E. Brinton. 1990. A practical guide to the euphausiids of the world. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), London. 96 p. [ Links ]

Blunden, J. and D.S. Arndt. 2016. State of the climate in 2015. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97: Si-S275. [ Links ]

Brinton, E., M.D. Ohman, A.W. Townsend, M.D. Knight and A.L. Bridgeman. 2000. Euphausiids of the world ocean, CD-ROM. Windows version 1.0 ed. (2000). UNESCO Publishing and ETI (Expert Center for Taxonomic Identification, University of Amsterdam). [ Links ]

Cavan, E.L., A. Belcher, A. Atkinson, S.L. Hill, S. Kawaguchi, S. McCormack, B. Meyer, S. Nicol, L. Ratnarajah, K. Schmidt, D.K. Steinberg, G.A. Tarling and P.W. Boyd. 2019. The importance of Antarctic krill in biogeochemical cycles. Nat. Commun., 10(1): 1-13. [ Links ]

Clarke, K.R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol., 18: 117-143. [ Links ]

Clarke, K. R. and M. Ainsworth. 1993. A method of linking multivariate community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 92: 205-219. [ Links ]

Clarke, K.R. and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Primer-E. Plymouth, UK. [ Links ]

Cleary, A.C., E.G. Durbin, M.C. Casas and M. Zhou. 2016. Winter distribution and size structure of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba populations in-shore along the West Antarctic Peninsula. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 552: 115-129. [ Links ]

Cleary, A.C, E.G Durbin and M.C. Casas. 2018. Feeding by Antarctic krill Euphausia superba in the West Antarctic Peninsula: differences between fjords and open waters. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 595: 39-54. [ Links ]

Conroy, J.A., D.K. Steinberg, P.S. Thibodeau and O. Schofield. 2020. Zooplankton diel vertical migration during Antarctic summer. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 103324. [ Links ]

Daly, K.M. and M.C. Macaulay. 1988. Abundance and distribution of krill in the ice edge zone of the Weddell Sea, austral spring 1983. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 35: 21-41. [ Links ]

Daly, K.M . and J.J. Zimmermman. 2004. Comparisons of morphology and neritic distributions of Euphausia crystallorophias and Euphausia superba furcilia during autumn and winter west of the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol., 28: 72-81. [ Links ]

Eveleth, R., N. Cassar, R.M. Sherrell, H. Ducklow, M.P. Meredith, H.J. Venables, Y. Lin and Z. Li. 2017. Ice melt influence on summertime net community production along the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 139: 89-102. [ Links ]

Everson, I. 1987 Some aspects of the small scale distribution of E. crystallorophias. Polar Biol., 8: 9-15. [ Links ]

Everson, I. 2000. Role of krill in marine food webs: the Southern Ocean. 194-201. In: Everson, I. (Ed.) Krill: biology, ecology and fisheries. Blackwell Science, Oxford. 373 p. [ Links ]

García, M.A., C.G. Castro, A.F. Ríos, M.D. Doval, G. Rosón, D. Gomis and O. López. 2002. Water masses and distribution of physico-chemical properties in the Western Bransfield Strait and Gerlache Strait during Austral summer 1995/96. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 49: 585-602. [ Links ]

Gibbons, M., V. Spiridonov and G. Tarling.1999. Euphausiacea:1241-1279. En: Boltovskoy, D (Ed.) South Atlantic zooplankton. Backhuys Publishers, The Netherlands. 1706 p. [ Links ]

Giraldo, A., M.I. Críales-Hernández, M. Jerez-Guerrero y D.F. Mojica-Moncada. 2019. Biomasa del mesozooplancton y ensamblaje de copépodos epipelágicos en el estrecho de Gerlache (Antártica) durante el verano austral de 2015. Bol. Invest. Mar. Costeras. 48(1): 9-26. [ Links ]

Gleiber, M.R., D.K. Steinberg and H.W. Ducklow. 2012. Time series of vertical flux of zooplankton fecal pellets on the continental shelf of the western Antarctic Peninsula. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 471: 23-36. [ Links ]

González, H. E., G. Daneri, J.L. Iriarte, B. Yannicelli, E. Menschel, C. Barría, S. Pantoja and L. Lizárraga. 2009. Carbon fluxes within the epipelagic zone of the Humboldt Current System off Chile: The significance of euphausiids and diatoms as key functional groups for the biological pump. Progr. Oceanogr., 83(1-4): 217-227. [ Links ]

Haraldsson, M. and V. Siegel. 2014. Seasonal distribution and life history of Thysanoessa macrura (Euphausiacea, Crustacea) in high latitude waters of the Lazarev Sea, Antarctica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 495: 105-118. [ Links ]

Hernández-León, S., A. Portillo-Hahnefeld, C. Almeida, P. Bécognée and I. Moreno. 2001. Diel feeding behaviour of krill in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctica. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 223: 235-242. [ Links ]

Hofmann, E.E. and E.J. Murphy. 2004. Advection, krill, and Antarctic marine ecosystems. Antarct Sci., 16: 487-499 [ Links ]

Hopkins, T.L. 1971. Zooplankton standing crop in the Pacific Sector of the Antarctic. 347-362. In: Llano G.W. and I.E. Wallen (Eds.) Biology of the Antarctic seas IV. Antarct. Res. Ser., 362 p. [ Links ]

Hosie, G.W., T. Ikeda and M. Stolp. 1988. Distribution, abundance and population structure of the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba, Dana) in the Pridz Bay Region, Antarctica. Polar Biol., 8: 213-224. [ Links ]

Hudson, J.M., D. Steinberg, T. Sutton, J. Graves and R. Latour. 2014. Myctophid feeding ecology and carbon transport along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 93: 104-116. [ Links ]

Huntley, M. and E. Brinton. 1991. Mesoscale variation in growth and early development of Euphausia superba Dana in the western Bransfield Strait region. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 38(8-9): 1213-1240. [ Links ]

Jiang, M., M.A. Charette, C.I, Measures, Y. Zhu and M. Zhou. 2013. Seasonal cycle of circulation in the Antarctic Peninsula and the off-shelf transport of shelf waters into southern Drake Passage and Scotia Sea. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 90: 15-30. [ Links ]

Ju, S.J. and H.R. Harvey. 2004. Lipids as markers of nutritional condition and diet in the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba and Euphausia crystallorophias during austral winter. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 51(17-19): 2199-2214. [ Links ]

Kawaguchi, S., T. Yoshida, L. Finley, P. Cramp and S. Nicol. 2007. The krill maturity cycle: a conceptual model of the seasonal cycle in Antarctic krill. Polar Biol., 30: 689-698. [ Links ]

Kittel, W. and R. Stepnlk. 1983. Distribution of Euphausia crystallorophias, E frigida, E. triacantha and Thysanoessa macrura (Crustacea, Euphausiacea) in the southern Drake Passage and Bransfield Strait in February and March 1981. Pol. Polar Res., 4: 7-19. [ Links ]

Kohlbach, D., B.A. Lange, M. Graeve, M. Vortkamp and H. Flores. 2019. Varying dependency of Antarctic euphausiids on ice algae-and phytoplankton-derived carbon sources during summer. Mar. Biol., 166(6): 79. [ Links ]

La, H.S., H. Lee, S. Fielding, D. Kang, H.K. Ha, A. Atkinson, J. Park, V. Siegel, S.H. Lee and H.C. Shin. 2015. High density of ice krill (Euphausia crystallorophias) in the Amundsen Sea coastal polynya, Antarctica. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 195: 75-84. [ Links ]

Lancraft, T.M., J.J. Torres and T.L. Hopkins. 1989. Micronekton and macrozooplankton in the open waters near Antarctic ice edge zones (AMERIEZ 1983 and 1986). Polar Biol., 9: 225-233. [ Links ]

Lawson, G.L., P-H. Wiebe, C.J. Ashjian and T.K. Stanton. 2008. Euphausiid distribution along the Western Antarctic Peninsula—Part B: distribution of euphausiid aggregations and biomass, and associations with environmental features. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 55(3-4): 432-454. [ Links ]

Lee, D.B., K.H. Choi, H.K. Ha, E.J. Yang, S.H. Lee, S. Lee and H.C. Shin. 2013. Mesozooplankton distribution patterns and grazing impacts of copepods and Euphausia crystallorophias in the Amundsen Sea, West Antarctica, during austral summer. Polar Biol., 36: 1215-1230. [ Links ]

Leonori, I., A. De Felice, G. Canduci, I. Costantini, I. Biagiotti, G. Giuliani and G. Budillon. 2017. Krill distribution in relation to environmental parameters in mesoscale structures in the Ross Sea. J. Mar. Syst., 166: 159-171. [ Links ]

Loeb, V. and J. Santora. 2015. Climate variability and spatiotemporal dynamics of five Southern Ocean krill species. Progr. Oceanogr., 134: 93-122. [ Links ]

Loeb, V. J. and E. Shulenberger. 1987. Vertical distributions and relations of euphausiid populations off Elephant Island, March 1984. Polar Biol., 7(6): 363-373. [ Links ]

Loeb, V ., E. Hofmann, J. Klinck, O. Holm-Hansen and W. White. 2009. ENSO and variability of the Antarctic Peninsula pelagic marine ecosystem. Antarctic Sci., 21(2): 135-148. [ Links ]

Marrari, M., K.L. Daly, A. Timonin and T. Semenova. 2011. The zooplankton of Marguerite Bay, Western Antarctic Peninsula - Part I: Abundance, distribution and population response to variability in environmental conditions. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 58: 1599-1613. [ Links ]

Mauchline, J. and L.R. Fisher. 1969. The biology of euphausiids. Adv. Mar. Biol., 7: 1-454. [ Links ]

Melnikov, I.A. and V.A. Spiridonov. 1996. Antarctic krill under perennial sea ice in the western Weddell Sea. Antarc. Sci., 8(4): 323-329. [ Links ]

Mendes, C.R.B., V.M. Tavano, T.S. Dotto, R. Kerr, M.S. de Souza, C.A.E. García and E.R. Secchi. 2018. New insights on the dominance of cryptophytes in Antarctic coastal waters: a case study in Gerlache Strait. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 149: 161-170. [ Links ]

Murase, H., K. Matsuoka, T. Ichii and S. Nishiwaki. 2002. Relationship between the distribution of euphausiids and baleen whales in the Antarctic examined using JARPA data. Polar Biol., 25(2): 135-145. [ Links ]

Nicol, S. 2006. Krill, currents, and sea ice: Euphausia superba and its changing environment. Bioscience, 56(2): 111-120. [ Links ]

Nicol, S. and J. Foster. 2016. The fishery for Antarctic krill: its current status and management regime: 387-422. In: Siegel, V. (Ed.). Biology and ecology of Antarctic krill. Springer, Cham.441 p. [ Links ]

Nicol S, J. Foster and S. Kawaguchi. 2012. The fishery for Antarctic krill - recent developments. Fish Fish., 13(1): 30-40 [ Links ]

Nordhausen, W. 1992. Distribution and growth of larval and adult Thysanoessa macrura (Euphausiacea) in the Bransfield Strait Region, Antarctica. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 83(2): 185-196. [ Links ]

Nordhausen, W. 1994a. Winter abundance and distribution of Euphausia superba, E. crystallorophias, and Thysanoessa macrura in Gerlache Strait and Crystal Sound, Antarctica. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 109: 131-142. [ Links ]

Nordhausen, W. 1994b. Distribution and diel vertical migration of the euphausiid Thysanoessa macrura in Gerlache Strait, Antarctica. Polar Biol., 14: 219-229. [ Links ]

Nowacek, D., A. Friedlaender, P. Halpin, E. Hazen, D. Johnston, A. Read, B. Espinasse, M. Zhou and Y. Zhu. 2011. Super-aggregations of krill and humpback whales in Wilhelmina Bay, Antarctic Peninsula. PLoS One, 6(4): 1-5. [ Links ]

Pakhomov, E. A . and R. Perissinotto. 1996. Antarctic neritic krill Euphausia crystallorophias: spatio-temporal distribution, growth and grazing rates. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 43(1): 59-87. [ Links ]

Pakhomov, E .A., R. Perissinotto and P.W. Froneman. 1998. Abundance and trophodynamics of Euphausia crystallorophias in the shelf region of the Lazarev Sea during austral spring and summer. J. Mar Syst., 17: 313-324. [ Links ]

Parker, M., J. Donnelly and J. Torres. 2011. Invertebrate micronekton and macrozooplankton in the Marguerite Bay region of the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 58: 1580-1598. [ Links ]

Piatkowski, U. 1985. Distribution, abundance and diurnal migration of macrozooplankton in Antarctic surface waters. Meeresforschung/Rep. Mar. Res., 30: 264-279. [ Links ]

Piatkowski, U. 1989. Macrozooplankton communities from Weddell Sea surface waters, Antarctica. Pesq. Antartica Bras., 1(1): 1-10. [ Links ]

Postel, L., H. Fock and W. Hagen. 2000. Biomass and abundance. 83 -192. In: Harris, R. P., P.H. Weibe, J. Lenz, H. R. Skjoldal and M. Huntley. ICES Zooplankton methodology manual. Academic, London. 684 p. [ Links ]

Reiss, C.S., A. Cossio, J.A. Santora, K.S. Dietrich, A. Murray, B.G. Mitchell, J. Walsh, E. L. Weiss, C. Gimpel, C.D. Jones and G.M. Watters. 2017. Overwinter habitat selection by Antarctic krill under varying sea-ice conditions: implications for top predators and fishery management. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 568: 1-16. [ Links ]

Rodríguez, J., F. Jiménez-Gómez, J.M. Blanco and F.L. Figueroa. 2002. Physical gradients and spatial variability of the size structure and composition of phytoplankton in the Gerlache Strait (Antarctica). Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 49: 693-706. [ Links ]

Rogers, A.D., N.M. Johnson, E.J. Murphy and A. Clarke. 2012. Antarctic ecosystems: an extreme environment in a changing world. Wiley, Noida. 756 p. [ Links ]

Rombolá, E., E. Marschoff and N. Coria. 2012. Analysis of the sources of variance in the mean size of krill consumed by Chinstrap and Adélie penguins at South Orkney Islands. Polar Biol., 35: 1601-1606. [ Links ]

Sala, A., M. Azzali and A. Russo. 2002. Krill of the Ross Sea: distribution, abundance and demography of Euphausia superba and Euphausia crystallorophias during the Italian Antarctic Expedition (January-February 2000). Sci. Mar., 66(2): 123-133. [ Links ]

Santora, J.A., R.R. Veit, C.S. Reiss, I.D. Schroeder and M. Mangel. 2017. Ecosystem oceanography of seabird hotspots: environmental determinants and relationship with Antarctic krill within an important fishing ground. Ecosystems, 20(5): 885-903. [ Links ]

Schmidt, K., A. Atkinson, S. Steigenberger, S. Fielding, M.C. Lindsay, D.W. Pond, G.A. Tarling, C.S. Allen, S. Nicol and E.P. Achterberg. 2011. Seabed foraging by Antarctic krill: implications for stock assessment, bentho-pelagic coupling, and the vertical transfer of iron. Limnol. Oceanogr., 56(4): 1411-1428. [ Links ]

Schmidt, K , C. Schlosser, A. Atkinson, S. Fielding, H.J. Venables, C.M. Waluda and E.P. Achterberg. 2016. Zooplankton gut passage mobilises lithogenic iron for ocean productivity. Curr. Biol., 26: 2667-2673. [ Links ]

Schnack-Schiel, S. B. and A. Mujica. 1994. The zooplankton of the Antarctic Peninsula region. 79-92. In: El-Sayed, S. Z. (Ed.). Southern Ocean Ecology: the BIOMASS Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 391 p. [ Links ]

Seyboth, E., S. Botta, C.R.B. Mendes, J. Negrete, L. Dalla-Rosa and E.R. Secchi. 2018. Isotopic evidence of the effect of warming on the northern Antarctic Peninsula ecosystem. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 149: 218-228. [ Links ]

Siegel, V. 2016. Introducing Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana, 1850: 1-19. In: Siegel, V. (Ed.) Biology and ecology of Antarctic krill. Advances in Polar Ecology. Springer, Cham. 441 p. [ Links ]

Siegel, V. and U. Harm. 1996. The composition, abundance, biomass and diversity of the epipelagic zooplankton communities of the southern Bellingshausen Sea (Antarctic) with special reference to krill and salps. Arch. Fish. Mar. Res., 44(1/2): 115-139. [ Links ]

Siegel, V . and J.L. Watkins. 2016. Distribution, biomass and demography of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. 21-100. In: Siegel,V. (Ed.). Biology and ecology of Antarctic krill. Springer, Cham. 441 p. [ Links ]

Steinberg, D.K., K.E. Ruck, M.R. Gleiber, L.M. Garzio, J.S. Cope, K.S. Bernard, S.E. Stammerjohn, O.M.E. Schofield, B.Q. Langdon and R.M. Ross. 2015. Long-term (1993-2013) changes in macrozooplankton off the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep- Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 101: 54-70. [ Links ]

Stone, G. and W. Hamner. 1988. Humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae and southern right whales Eubalaena australis in the Gerlache Strait, Antarctica. Polar Rec., 24(148): 15-20. [ Links ]

Tarling, G.A., T. Klevjer, S. Fiedling, J. Watkins, A. Atkinson, E. Murphy, R. Korb, M. Whitehouse and R. Leaper. 2009. Variability and predictability of Antarctic krill swarm structure. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 56: 1994-2012. [ Links ]

Thiriot-Quiévreux, C., A. Leitāo and J. Cuzin-Roudy. 1998. Chromosome diversity in Mediterranean and Antarctic euphausiid species (Euphausiacea). J. Crust. Biol., 18(2): 290-297. [ Links ]

Thomas, P.G. and K. Green. 1988. Distribution of Euphausia crystallorophias within Prydz Bay and its importance to the inshore marine ecosystem. Polar Biol., 8(5): 327-331. [ Links ]

Torres-Parra, R.R., A.L. Caicedo-Laurido and J.D. Iriarte-Sánchez. 2020. Hydrographic conditions during two austral summer situations (2015 and 2017) in the Gerlache and Bismarck straits, northern Antarctic Peninsula. Deep- Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 161: 103278. [ Links ]

Trathan, P. N . and S.L. Hill. 2016. The importance of krill predation in the Southern Ocean: 321-350. In: Siegel, V. (Ed.) The biology and ecology of Antarctic krill. Springer, Cham. 441 p. [ Links ]

Trathan, P. N., A.S. Brierley, M.A. Brandon, D.G. Bone, C. Goss, S.A. Grant, E.J. Murphy and J.L. Watkins. 2003. Oceanographic variability and changes in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) abundance at South Georgia. Fish. Oceanogr., 12(6): 569-583. [ Links ]

Varela, M., E. Fernández and P. Serret. 2002. Size-fractionated phytoplankton biomass and primary production in the Gerlache and south Bransfield Straits (Antarctic Peninsula) in Austral summer 1995-1996. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 49(4): 749-768. [ Links ]

Wallis, J.R., S. Kawaguchi and K.M. Swadling. 2018. Sexual differentiation, gonad maturation, and reproduction of the Southern Ocean euphausiid Thysanoessa macrura (Sars, 1883) (Crustacea: Euphausiacea). J. Crust. Biol., 38(1): 107-118. [ Links ]

Ward, P., S. Grant, M. Brandon, V. Siegel, V . Sushin, V. Loeb and H. Griffiths. 2004. Mesozooplankton community structure in the Scotia Sea during the CCAMLR 2000 survey: January - February 2000. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 51: 1351-1367. [ Links ]

Weber, L.H., S.Z. El-Sayed and I. Hampton. 1986. The variance spectra of phytoplankton, krill and water temperature in the Antarctic Ocean south of Africa. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 33: 1327-1343 [ Links ]

Wiebe, P., C. Ashjian, G. Lawson, A. Piñones and N. Copley. 2011. Horizontal and vertical distribution of euphausiid species on the Western Antarctic Peninsula U.S. GLOBEC Southern Ocean study site. Deep-Sea Res. Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 58: 1630-1651. [ Links ]

Yamanaka, I. 1983. Interaction among krill, whales and other animals in the Antarctic ecosystem. Mem. Natl. Inst. Polar Res., Spec. is., 27: 220-232. [ Links ]

Zhou, M., P.P. Nieler and J-H. Hu. 2002. Surface currents in the Bransfield and Gerlache Straits, Antarctica. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 49: 267-280. [ Links ]

Zhou, M ., P.P. Nieler, Y. Zhu and R.D. Dorland. 2006. The western boundary current in the Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. Deep-Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 53(7), 1244-1252. [ Links ]

Received: October 03, 2019; Accepted: October 05, 2020

*Autor de correspondencia: marisol.rivera.gomez@correounivalle.edu.co

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License