SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue1Catalytic ozonation in treatment of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in wastewater: A bibliometric analysisUses, nutritional properties and sensory evaluation for amaranth, quinoa and grape and coffee by-products author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Ingeniería y competitividad

Print version ISSN 0123-3033On-line version ISSN 2027-8284

Ing. compet. vol.24 no.1 Cali Jan./June 2022  Epub Oct 30, 2021

https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.24i1.10973 

Review

Digital image processing techniques for detection of pests and diseases in crops: a review

Técnicas de procesamiento digital de imágenes para detección de plagas y enfermedades en cultivos: una revisión

July A. Gómez-Camperos1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-144X

Haidee Y. Jaramillo1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-119X

Gustavo Guerrero-Gómez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-4105

1 Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña, Facultad de Ingenierías, Grupo de investigación GINSTI y GITYD, Ocaña, Colombia. Correo electrónico: jagomezc@ufpso.edu.co, hyjaramillo@ufpso.edu.co, gguerrerog@ufpso.edu.co


Abstract

Proper detection of pests and diseases in crop production is essential to increase agricultural production in a sustainable way. For this reason, the term Agriculture 4.0 is incorporated, which integrates a set of technologies, devices, protocols, and computational paradigms to improve agricultural processes. Information on climatic conditions, soils, diseases, insects, seeds, fertilizers. It constitutes an essential contribution to the economic and sustainable development of this sector. Digital image processing techniques are a tool that allows early identification of pests or diseases in crops such as cereals, fruit trees, roots, leaves, and tubers mainly. In this way, mitigate economic losses in the agricultural sector. Globally, about 40% of crops are discarded by various diseases and pests. In most cases, crop diseases produce visible symptoms and characteristics during plant growth. Due to the scarcity of technologies used in crops, the diagnosis of diseases and pests is supported mainly by human inspection, generating errors caused by the subjectivity of individuals.

This literature review was carried out to identify different digital image processing techniques for pests and disease prevention in crops from different agricultural sectors. The results showed that the diagnostic system is composed of the acquisition of images, pre-image processing, segmentation, characteristics extraction, characteristics selection, and the subsequent classification of pests or diseases. Likewise, current trends and challenges on the subject are presented.

Keywords: agriculture; crop; disease; image processing; plague

Resumen

La detección adecuada de plagas y enfermedades en la producción de cultivos es fundamental para aumentar la producción agrícola de forma sostenible. Es por esta razón, que se incorpora el término Agricultura 4.0, la cual integra un conjunto de tecnologías, dispositivos, protocolos y paradigmas computacionales para mejorar los procesos agrícolas. La información sobre las condiciones climáticas, suelos, enfermedades, insectos, semillas, fertilizantes, constituye una importante contribución al desarrollo económico y sostenible de este sector. Las técnicas de procesamiento digital de imágenes son una herramienta que permite la identificación temprana de las plagas o enfermedades en los cultivos como: cereales, frutales, raíces, hojas y tubérculos; y de esta forma, mitigar pérdidas económicas en el sector agrícola. A nivel mundial, alrededor del 40% de los cultivos son desechados por diversas enfermedades y plagas. En la mayoría de los casos, las enfermedades de los cultivos producen síntomas y características visibles durante el crecimiento de las plantas. Debido a la escasez de tecnologías utilizadas en los cultivos, el diagnóstico de las enfermedades y plagas se soporta en gran parte en la inspección humana, generando errores ocasionados por la subjetividad de los individuos. La presente revisión de literatura se llevó a cabo con la finalidad de identificar diferentes técnicas de procesamiento digital de imágenes para la prevención de plagas y enfermedades en cultivos de los diferentes sectores agrícolas. Los resultados demostraron que el sistema de diagnóstico está compuesto de la adquisición de imágenes, preprocesamiento de imágenes, la segmentación, la extracción de características, la selección de características y la posterior clasificación de las plagas o enfermedades; asimismo, se presentan las tendencias y desafíos actuales en la temática.

Palabras Claves: agricultura; cultivo; enfermedad; procesamiento de imágenes; plaga

1. Introduction

The need to adapt the agricultural sector to the demands and requirements (present and future) of the population has caused the second green revolution or agriculture 4.0. Its basis is collecting and analyzing data on the field to improve crop quality, take data in real-time, generate corrective actions, reduce environmental pollution, and deal with climate change. This improvement is possible with the use of technologies such as drones, sensors, software, mobile applications, among others that allow the development of monitoring systems, traceability, geolocation, soil mapping, guidance systems, crop data management technification of the countryside 1.

Agriculture remains an important sector for most countries. Because it represents the main source of food for the world's population, however, it faces a significant challenge: producing more and better while increasing sustainability with reasonable use of natural resources, reducing environmental degradation and adapting to climate change, reducing the environmental impact of plant protection products, and preventing the introduction and spread of quarantine diseases. Therefore, there is a great interest in developing legislative, scientific, and technological tools to detect diseases and pests in crops 2. Modern technologies such as expert systems, artificial intelligence, and computer vision have made it possible to solve problems in different applications such as rice, corn, grape, palm, banana fields, and the detection of different types of diseases 3,4.

On the other hand, 5 used artificial intelligence techniques to estimate the visual characteristics of different plant leaves through image processing. The results showed that the artificial vision techniques models could be of great use in agriculture if good training and validation of the virtual tools is carried out. Similar studies have been reported by 6-10.

Currently, pests monitoring, and crop diseases are also done by remote sensing through the leaves level, canopy, and field. In this way, hyperspectral and multispectral aerial data have been used to monitor the disease in tomatoes and rice, for example, according to the study carried out by Phone et al.11. Likewise, authors such as 12 and 13 have carried out review studies establishing different variables that intervene in plant diseases in agriculture and how they have been treated with artificial intelligence techniques, determining that the type of soil and the climate (temperature and humidity) is one of the most important variables In the agricultural sector.

Huang et al. 14 analyzed the spectral characteristics of yellow rust (pest type) and its influences on winter wheat based on multitemporal push-broom hyperspectral imaging (PHI). Besides, they used a regression model to predict the severity of yellow rust successfully. On the other hand, Barman et al. 15 classified citrus from oranges with 60% accuracy based on hyperspectral images in the air. However, information on the control of crop pests and diseases is still scarce because large-scale detection due to the area's magnitude is difficult to study and process.

The application of image processing techniques and machine learning algorithms in the detection and recognition of diseases and pests in crops is an active area of research that shows great potential for study. Currently, several methods are used for the detection of pests and diseases, among which are the direct chain 16, fuzzy system 17, K-Means clustering 18, decision tree 19,20, computer vision, and artificial intelligence 21-23, deep convolutional neural network 24,25, Markov algorithms 26, fuzzy inference system 27,28, convolutional neural network (CNN) 29,30, and Bayesian networks 31, as the important methods currently studied.

Considering the above, digital image processing is an important study area due to the need to innovate and improve agricultural processes, with which computer technologies can be applied together with innovative methods for agriculture 4.0. such as sensors based on the analysis of host responses, e.g., differential mobility spectrometer and lateral flow devices, provide instant results and can effectively detect early infections directly in the field, phage display-based biosensors and biophotonics can also detect infections instantly although can be integrated with other systems. Therefore, this review study aims to identify approaches, methods, and technologies of a plant pest and disease detection system through articles collected in current databases.

2. Methodology

The information collection was carried out in different academic sources, as following IEEE, Scopus, and Science Direct due to being the most prominent. This with the aim to identify works/articles in the databases related to the subject of detecting pests and diseases in crops using digital processing techniques of images. Figure 1 shows the process carried out during the review.

Source: own elaboration

Figure 1 Article search and selection process.  

The following questions were presented to establish the search for articles: 1) What digital image processing techniques are used to detect pests and diseases in crops? and 2) In what types of crops have digital image processing techniques been used to detect diseases and pests? Table 1 shows the information search conditions using defined text strings. The search equation was selected considering the following words: diseases in crops, plants, and artificial intelligence.

Table 1 Information search conditions 

Database Search string Number of articles
Science Direct Digital crop imaging techniques, automatic crop disease detection, crop pest detection 30
IEEE Automatic detection of diseases and pests in crops 9
Scopus Automatic detection of diseases and pests in crops 22

Source: own elaboration

3. Results

In the literature review 63 articles were gathered, where the information was collected and analyzed around the search questions that were selected, and the results are presented below.

3.1. Digital image processing techniques for detecting diseases in crops

The articles found that the extraction of artisanal characteristics (visual method) of the leaves of the crops is the most common technique used for the recognition of crop diseases, as shown in Figure 2.

Source: own elaboration

Figure 2 Steps for the extraction of artisan characteristics.  

Image acquisition begins with transferring electronic signals from a sensor to a numerical representation by a device such as a camera. Mainly, two types of cameras can be used that are distinguished by way of scanning: area or line. Conventional or area scan cameras generate an image with each exposure cycle. In contrast, line scan cameras capture only one line of pixels at a time. To acquire two-dimensional images, it is necessary to move the object to be captured employing a protractor or move the camera along a stationary object. The quality of the image acquired by a computer vision system is directly affected by the lighting used during the acquisition phase.

In this way, all the effort invested in the use of adequate lighting will increase the performance and reliability of the system, reducing the complexity of the software used in the pre-processing stage 32. Examples of procedures carried out at this stage are image resizing, filtering, color space conversion, and histogram equalization. In-plant disease recognition applications, the segmentation is twofold. First, segmentation is carried out to isolate the leaf, fruit, or flower from the background, and then a second segmentation is carried out to isolate healthy tissue from diseased tissue 33, taking into account the image colors previously programmed.

Characteristics extraction involves extracting information from the segmented image that could facilitate the precise classification of the anomaly (the pest or disease identified by agricultural crop). The characteristics that can be extracted are texture (energy, contrast, homogeneity, and correlation), shape, size, and color 34. Texture features can be extracted using statistical measures such as local binary patterns (LBP), gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), color co-occurrence matrix (CCM), and spatial gray level dependency matrix (SGLDM). Texture features can also be extracted using model-based methods, such as Auto-Regressive (AR) and Markov Random Field (MRF) models 35.

3.2. Methods for classifying diseases in crops

3.2.1. Support Vector Machines “SVM”

SVM is a non-probabilistic linear classifier that constructs a decision threshold with the greatest possible distance between the examples. An SVM attempts to find the hyperplane by dividing the data into two subspaces with the maximum distance between the data closest to the hyperplane (called a separate hyperplane). The distance between the hyperplane and the data is called the margin. The data closest to the hyperplane are called support vectors. Because data is divided into two subsets of data, there are two types of support vectors: those of a subset of data and those of a different subset of data. They are often called positive and negative support vectors, respectively. In this way, it is possible to create linear separators without the original space of the inputs, it is impossible to define them linearly. Finally, SVM is a non-parametric method, so it has the flexibility to represent complex functions and at the same time is resistant to overfitting 36.

3.2.2. Neural network

A neural network is composed of nodes connected by directed links with an associated weight that determines the strength and signal of the connection. Weights are the main form of long-term storage in neural networks and learning algorithms can generally update the weights. The input and output nodes are those with connections to the external world. Each node is independent of the others and therefore can perform your calculations only from their input values and their respective weights. Each unit receives the values of the incoming links, calculates the activation level, and when activated, sends the signal to all its outgoing links. The four main architectures used are unsupervised pre-trained networks, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, and recursive neural networks. These networks are already used to solve various problems such as text-to-speech conversion, cite fan2014 synthesis, language identification, translation, signal processing, automatic character recognition, and automatic generation of subtitles. In the classification of images, convolutional neural networks are the most used due to their nature. The main purpose of a convolutional neural network (CNN) is to learn the data characteristics of convolution operations. Therefore, this type of network is more suitable for the recognition of patterns in images 37.

3.2.3. K-Means grouping technique

The K-means clustering method is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm used to segment the interest region from plant leaf images. Also, divide the data objects into K-groups based on the similarity between the objects. K-means is a technique used to segmentation wheat diseases such as leaf rust, powdery mildew, and striped rust from images using automatic data grouping (clustering), which is achieved by considering the absolute difference between each pixel and the clustering center in the color space.

3.2.4. Edge detection techniques

The edge is defined as the boundary with different properties between two regions. It is the transition point from one entity to another. This detection technique is used to describe the physical scale of objects because there is often a significant change in intensity at the area’s boundaries. Edge detection is a critical step in understanding image function and is also used to separate images into specific target regions according to needs 17.

3.2.5. Convolutional neural network

A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a type of data processing breakthrough neural network with a grid-like topology. CNN is one of the best algorithms in deep learning methodologies because it can easily understand the image’s content and, therefore, aid in different classifications. CNN can be classified into seven different types based on architectural modifications, including ResNet, VGG, GoogLeNet, AlexNet, DAG Net, and AlexNet. Transfer learning methods are developed to increase the learning capacity of the methodology 20.

Transfer learning is one of the machine learning methods in which the model developed for a particular task can be reused for the second model. In transfer learning, the training of the base network is carried out first on the data set. Then it is passed to the next layer, where the target data set is trained again. The whole process would work if the characteristics extracted in the target and base tasks are general and not specified for particular tasks.

3.3. Classification of pests in crops

In the articles consulted, it was found that the classification of pests in crops utilizing digital image processing techniques is carried out with the methodology shown in Figure 3.

Source: own elaboration

Figure 3 Pest characteristics extraction diagram.  

3.3.1. Image acquisition and pre-processing

Processing began with the acquisition of the cropped image. Then, pre-processing operations are performed to improve the image by eliminating unwanted distortion and enhancing the desired characteristics for further processing 38. In image pre-processing, image quality enhancement techniques are applied to reduce noise and sharpen the image for greater precision. This process is carried out to improve the image’s quality to obtain a better detection and classification of insects, pests, and diseases.

3.3.2. Segmentation

The next step in the discovery process is segmentation. Segmentation is performed on the image converted to color to separate the object of interest from the sheet. Generally, Gaussian mixture models and segmentation algorithms are employed, as described in the reference 25. These algorithms involve many arithmetic calculations in the form of divisions, multiplications, and calculation average, which in turn leads to an exponential increase in execution time 39.

3.3.3. Feature extraction

Feature extraction plays an important role in image processing. Feature extraction techniques are applied to extract features useful for image recognition and classification. A feature set contains information to distinguish one object from another. Features can be classified into two, shape feature extraction and texture feature extraction. Some image properties are considered in the extraction of characteristics, such as region properties, gray covariance, among others 40.

  • Shape feature extraction: Shape characteristics are the essential characteristics that are not affected due to scale, rotation, and translation and are applied in computer vision and automatic object recognition systems. The classification of insects is carried out based on the finite shape characteristics extracted from the images of insects. RGB-shaped insect images were converted to grayscale images for further feature extraction. Image processing techniques are applied to extract shape features using Sobel's edge detection algorithm and morphological operations. The nine shape features include area, perimeter, major axis length, minor axis length, eccentricity, circularity, solidity, shape factor, and compactness stored in feature vectors and then applied to classifier models 41.

  • Texture feature extraction: Color is a property of pixels, while texture can be measured from a group of pixels. Examples of texture characteristics are energy entropy, contrast, among others. According to the domain from which the texture feature is extracted, they can be classified into spatial texture feature extraction and spectral texture feature extraction 42,43.

3.3.4. Pest classification

This final classification categorizes all the pixels in the image into different classes according to their similarities or differences. Two types of classification methods are supervised classification and unsupervised classification.

On the other hand, in unsupervised pest classification, pixel clusters are based on an image’s software analysis without the user providing a training data set. The computer uses techniques to determine which pixels are related and groups them into classes. Supervised classification is based on the idea that a user can select sample pixels in an image representing tutorials. Then the image processing software uses these training data sets as references for the classification process of all the pixels of the image. The training data sets are selected based on the user's knowledge. Table 2 shows some works related to the technique of extraction of characteristics for diseases in crops. On the other hand, Table 3 shows some works related to the pests and diseases classification in crops.

Table 2 Summary of recent works on the recognition of diseases through the extraction of artisanal characteristics 

Reference Processing techniques Precision
3 Crop: Wheat 78%
Techniques: Color constancy normalization, automatic SLIC segmentation, and manual clipping of the region of interest (RoI) using the touch screen of the mobile device and the Chan-Vese algorithm
44 Crop: Rice Probability ratio of brown spot and leaf scald diseases was 25 and 50%, respectively.
Techniques: Histogram intersection, grouping of K-means based on thresholds.
45 Crops: Apple, Corn, Grape, Potato, Tomato, Tobacco Apple: 83.3% Corn: 87.2% Grape: 86.8% Potato: 81.9% Tomato: 87.3% Tobacco: 82.5%
Techniques: Automatic image segmentation algorithm and deep learning with an expanded data set.
46 Crops: Beans and Potatoes LIRA, an 88% recognition rate.
Techniques: Neural classifiers RSC (Sub-space Random Classifier) and LIRA (Limited Receptive Area) With CSR, or 89%.
24 Crops: Corn 88.4%
Technique: convolutional neural networks
47 Crop: Banana 98.6%.
Technique: Correlation coefficient
48 Crop: Onion 87.2%
Technique: Neural Networks
49 Crop: Apple, Banana, Cabbage, Yucca, Celery, Corn Cucumber, Grape 99.5%
Technique: Convolutional Neural Networks

Source: Own elaboration.

Table 3 Summary of recent works on classification and detection of pests in crops 

Article Processing techniques Precision
50 Convolutional neural networks 92.4%
51 Sparse multi-task coding, multi-core learning technique Colour: 70.2% Texture: 63.5% Form: 80.2%
52 Deep residual learning method Classification of 98.6%
53 Multilayer classifier based on the random threshold classifier Recognition rate 85%.
54 Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) 59.8%
55 Deep learning with UAV imaging 91.2%
56 SVM classification With an error less than 2.5%.

Source: Own elaboration.

3.4. Image-based techniques for the detection of diseases in crops

Optical imaging technology, also called "image-based technique", has gained great interest in detecting diseases and pests in crops, which has become a valuable tool in all significant areas of application due to different technological advances and developments that help process improvement 57. Known emerging imaging-based techniques for food safety and quality include traditional imaging (TI), hyperspectral imaging (HSI), laser backscatter imaging (LBI), ultrasound imaging (UI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray imaging (XRI), thermal imaging (TI), fluorescence imaging (FI), Raman imaging (RI), microwave imaging (MI), and 3D imaging. These emerging imaging techniques have shown promising potential in the non-destructive quality control of various food products58.

3.4.1. 3D image

In 2D imaging, the data are taken from two different dimensions that differ given some plant names, such as development, total height, and yield estimation. Therefore, the need for 3D images appears as an essential element for the automatic detection of plant diseases. There are two main 3D representations: one related to the surface and the other to the volume presentations. The first involves the details of depth, the surface element, and the different points given by their dimension coordinates. The volume is also given by defining the volumetric component and a frequency component of the model coordinates.

Nowadays, different types of affordable sensors are available besides exhibit highly advanced technology for different domains like nutrient content, growth level, crop presence, biomass estimation, height, and health status. Plant leaf diseases are further analyzed using these sensors because the collected data can be used to quantify the various previously identified production traits.

3.4.2. Fluorescence images

The fluorescence imaging system is one of the practical ways to distinguish the state of metabolism in plants. The fluorescence method that emits light focuses on the chlorophyll complex of the plant. The light irradiates the chloroplast with blue light resulting in re-emission of the light that was absorbed by the chlorophyll. As a result, fluorescent light reflects light to assimilate blue light. The combination of the blue light source with the saturation of the blue pulse could be used to estimate the efficiency and other physical properties of plants.

The UV light source for fluorescence excitation is obtained from a xenon or halogen lamp. A charge-coupled device (CCD) camera is used as fluorescence detection to record the excitation of fluorescence at specific wavelengths. CCD cameras respond with sensitivity to visible and ultraviolet light radiated by the fluorescence signal along with other light sources, including pulsed lasers, pulsed flash lamps, or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) 59.

3.4.3. Tomography

Tomography is one technique that involves obtaining images of a single plane or an object that a tomography generates. There are different tomography types such as linear, polytomography, zonography, computerized or computerized axial type, and positron emission tomography. For the detection of diseases in plants, tomography is used to evaluate the plant state, being a non-invasive technique, capable of offering information on the entire cross-sections of the fruit and the plant with only one measurement, the tomography is based on the transformation of the data, which are given as ranges of speeds, in colors. It is done through software that interpolates the data obtained. The interpretation of the result depends directly on the meaning of each color.

3.4.4. Multispectral images

Multispectral imaging techniques use different types of wavebands such as green, red, or near-infrared wavebands to capture all kinds of images rather than invisible or visible fruits or crops, or vegetation. To detect plant diseases, multispectral images are integrated with classification algorithms and machine learning that give the information to meaningful data 60.

3.4.5. Hyperspectral images

Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) technology combines the advantages of traditional computer vision and spectroscopy. This technology enables the spatial and spectral variation in a sample to be measured simultaneously.

This technique aims to find the spectrum of the involved pixels that contribute to the image under consideration. The hyperspectral imaging device is implemented for wavelength dispersion, and a transport stage is present. Besides different from the traditional computer vision system 61.

The spectral variation is the product of the interaction of the matter's radiation for hundreds of 10 wavelengths and sampling points simultaneously. It can be quantified by reflectance, which is defined as the percentage of light emitted by a sample concerning the total light that falls on it. This technique aims to obtain information through a group of spectral bands, thus detecting the affected leaves and fruits, classification. From a hyperspectral image, the spectral signature (Spectrum) of a pixel can be obtained. It is possible to try to detect damage caused more efficiently than with conventional RGB systems.

3.4.6. Magnetic resonance images

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a unique technology that measures the magnetic properties of spins related to subjects' physical or chemical properties. NMR is the physical process in which the nucleus, whose magnetic moment is different from zero, resonantly absorbs radiation of a certain frequency under an external magnetic field. The detectors detect and receive the emitted NMR signals as electromagnetic radiation. These signals can be sent to the computer and converted into an image through data processing 62.

In the detection of diseases in crops, magnetic resonance imaging is used to identify in advance, in a non-destructive way, the composition and internal structure of the quality of fruits and vegetables. Magnetic resonance images represent different parameters of the analyzed object: the density of atoms, the time it takes for the atoms to return energy to the medium, and the time it takes for the atoms to lose coherence with each other.

3.4.7. Thermal images

Thermography is a non-destructive temperature monitoring technique based on infrared radiation emitted by an object. Thermal imaging evaluation provides useful key data on the dimension, heat distribution, and structural analysis. Thermal imaging can aid in the early detection of plant diseases and therefore allow the design of timely control treatments, allowing for presymptomatic monitoring of plant diseases and pests. Thermal imaging can efficiently monitor temperature irregularities at an early stage of development using thermal imaging analysis.

3.5. Trends and challenges in digital image processing techniques for the detection of pests and diseases in crops

After reviewing different articles mentioned in this work, some challenges to be solved in the agricultural sector are presented below:

  • The data set should be considered in large quantity due to the cultivation areas in the agricultural industry.

  • Acquired images are affected by background data and noise (i.e., image quality).

  • Segment the exact place on an insignificant leaf disease-preparation of training and test samples from the input image.

  • Classification plays a role in recognizing a segmented point in disease in a pest.

  • The color, size, and texture of the crop leaf vary when the weather changes depending on the year's month.

  • Regular observation is needed for particular crops to identify important characteristics.

  • In Fuzzy C-Means grouping techniques, the calculation can be concentrated, and the determination of the membership operation is a difficult task for detecting diseases in crops.

  • Identifying diseases and pests for different leaves, stems, and fruits of crops is a challenge through visual inspection.

The reviews suggest that image processing and machine learning techniques have great potential to find diseases and pests in crops, so you should continue to subject research. In this way, it contributes to the economic development of the agricultural sector that is affected widely due to the problem of damage to crops due to pests and diseases generated during the growth of plants that are part of the production process.

4. Conclusions

This article presents a review of image processing techniques for detecting diseases and pests in crops. Also, it presents different algorithms used in the identification of diseases and pests in the agro-industrial sector.

This article reviews the non-destructive techniques that have been used to detect plant diseases and crops. Two non-destructive techniques have been discussed for detecting plant diseases, image-based approaches, and image-processing approaches. Image-based approaches include fluorescence and hyperspectral imaging, while image-processing approaches consist of image acquisition, image pre-processing, image segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. Image processing techniques require a combination of camera and software for further image analysis. Based on this method, the classifier selections are chosen to produce reliable results.

Conventional methods to identified diseases and pests in crops it is focused on the recognition of a single disease or a small number of diseases and generally worked well only under controlled conditions in the laboratory rather than in wild settings containing many Influence factors, such as uniform illumination, scale or constant position of the disease in the image. Although progress has been made regarding disease identification, most traditional methods are only capable of identifying some specific types of diseases in nature.

5. Acknowledgement and Funding Statement

The authors thank Dr. R.A. Garcia-Leon for his valuable collaboration. The authors received no specific funding for this work

6. References

1. Rahul MSP, Rajesh M. Image processing based Automatic Plant Disease Detection and Stem Cutting Robot. In: Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT). Tirunelveli: IEEE; 2020.p.889-94. Doi: 10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214257 [ Links ]

2. Burhan SA, Minhas S, Tariq A, Hassan NB. Estudio comparativo de algoritmos de aprendizaje profundo para la detección de enfermedades y plagas en cultivos de arroz. In: 12a Conferencia Internacional sobre Electrónica, Computadoras e Inteligencia Artificial. Bucharest. IEEE; 2020. p.1-5. Doi: 10.1109/ECAI50035.2020.9223239 [ Links ]

3. Johannes A, Picón A, Álvarez-Gila A, Echazarra J, Rodriguez-Vaamonde S, Navajas AD, et al. Automatic plant disease diagnosis using mobile capture devices, applied on a wheat use case. Comput Electron Agric. 2017;138:200-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.04.013 [ Links ]

4. Patil R, Kumar S. Bibliometric Survey on Diagnosis of Plant Leaf Diseases Using Artificial Intelligence. Int J Mod Agric. 2020;9(3):1111-31. [ Links ]

5. Yigit E, Sabanci K, Toktas A, Kayabasi A. A study on visual features of leaves in plant identification using artificial intelligence techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019;156:369-77. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.036 [ Links ]

6. Tavakoli H, Alirezazadeh P, Hedayatipour A, Banijamali N, Landwehr AH. Leaf image-based classification of some common bean cultivars using discriminative convolutional neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021;181:105935. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105935 [ Links ]

7. Aakif A, Faisal M. Automatic classification of plants based on their leaves. Biosystems Engineering. 2015;139:66-75. Doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.08.003 [ Links ]

8. Chaki J, Parekh J, Bhattacharya S. Plant leaf classification using multiple descriptors: A hierarchical approach. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. 2020;32(10):1158-72. Doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.01.007 [ Links ]

9. Horaisová K, Kukal J. Leaf classification from binary image via artificial intelligence. Biosystems Engineering. 2016;142:83-100. Doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.12.007 [ Links ]

10. Wang B, Gao Y, Yuan X, Xiong S, Feng X. From species to cultivar: Soybean cultivar recognition using joint leaf image patterns by multiscale sliding chord matching. Biosystems Engineering. 2020;194:99-111. Doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.03.019 [ Links ]

11. Huijser MP, Camel W, Hardy A. Reliability of the animal detection system along US Hwy 191 in Yellowstone National Park, Montana, USA. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Ecology and Transportation. (CEOT). USA; 2005. p. 509-523. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6cg9f98fLinks ]

12. Eli-Chukwu NC. Applications of artificial intelligence in agriculture: A review. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 2019;9(4):4377-83. Doi: 10.48084/etasr.2756 [ Links ]

13. Bannerjee G, Sarkar U, Das S, Ghosh I. Inteligencia artificial en la agricultura: un estudio de la literatura. Revista Internacional de Investigación Científica en Aplicaciones de Ciencias de la Computación y Estudios de Gestión. 2018;7(3):1-6. [ Links ]

14. Huang W, Lamb DW, Niu Z, Zhang Y, Lui L, Wang J. Identification of yellow rust in wheat using in-situ spectral reflectance measurements and airborne hyperspectral imaging. Precision Agric. 2007;8:187-97. Doi: 10.1007/s11119-007-9038-9 [ Links ]

15. Barman U, Choudhury RD, Sahu D, Barman GG. Comparison of convolution neural networks for smartphone image based real time classification of citrus leaf disease. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;177:105661. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105661 [ Links ]

16. Zhang B, Huang W, Li J, Zhao C, Fan S, Wu J. Chengliang Liu, Principles, developments and applications of computer vision for external quality inspection of fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Research International. 2014;62:326-43.: Doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.012 [ Links ]

17. Huili T, Jiyao Y, Lianqing Z, Zhou S. Agriculture disease diagnosis expert system based on knowledge and fuzzy reasoning: A case study of flower. In: 6th Int Conf Fuzzy Syst Knowl Discov (FSKD). China; IEEE; 2009. p. 39-43. Doi: 10.1109/FSKD.2009.512 [ Links ]

18. Zhou Z, Zang Y, Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang P, Luo X. Rice plant-hopper infestation detection and classification algorithms based on fractal dimension values and fuzzy C-means. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2013;58(3-4):701-09. Doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.028 [ Links ]

19. Gomez S, Vergara M, Montenegro A, Ruiz FA, Safari H, Raymaekers N, et al. Detection of banana plants and their major diseases through aerial images and machine learning methods: A case study in DR Congo and Republic of Benin. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2020;169:110-24. Doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.08.025 [ Links ]

20. Romero MP, Chang YM, Brunton LA, Parry J, Prosser A, Upton A. et al. Decision tree machine learning applied to bovine tuberculosis risk factors to aid disease control decision making. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2020;175:104860. Doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104860 [ Links ]

21. Ozyilmaz U. Evaluation of the effectiveness of antagonistic bacteria against Phytophthora blight disease in pepper with artificial intelligence. Biological Control. 2020;151:104379. Doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104379 [ Links ]

22. Abdulridha J, Ampatzidis Y, Roberts P, Kakarla S. Detecting powdery mildew disease in squash at different stages using UAV-based hyperspectral imaging and artificial intelligence. Biosystems Engineering. 2020;197:135-48. Doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.001 [ Links ]

23. Jha K, Doshi A, Patel P, Shah M. A comprehensive review on automation in agriculture using artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. 2019;2:1-12. Doi: 10.1016/j.aiia.2019.05.004 [ Links ]

24. Mishra S, Sachan R, Rajpal D. Deep Convolutional Neural Network based Detection System for Real-time Corn Plant Disease Recognition. Procedia Computer Science. 2020;167:2003-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.236 [ Links ]

25. Geetharamani G, Pandian JA. Identification of plant leaf diseases using a nine-layer deep convolutional neural network. Computers & Electrical Engineering. 2019;76:323-38, Doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.04.011 [ Links ]

26. Deeba K, Amutha B. ResNet - deep neural network architecture for leaf disease classification. Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2020;(InPress):103364. Doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103364 [ Links ]

27. Toseef M, Khan MJ. An intelligent mobile application for diagnosis of crop diseases in Pakistan using fuzzy inference system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018;153:1-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.07.034 [ Links ]

28. Kolhe S, Kamal R, Saini HS, Gupta GK. A web-based intelligent disease-diagnosis system using a new fuzzy-logic based approach for drawing the inferences in crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2011;76(1):16-27. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.002 [ Links ]

29. Picon A, Seitz M, Alvarez-Gila A, Mohnke P, Ortiz-Barredo A, Echazarra J. Crop conditional Convolutional Neural Networks for massive multi-crop plant disease classification over cell phone acquired images taken on real field conditions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019;167:105093. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105093 [ Links ]

30. Afonso M, Blok PM, Polder G, Van der Wolf JM, Kamp J. Blackleg Detection in Potato Plants using Convolutional Neural Networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;52(30):6-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.481 [ Links ]

31. Agarwal M, Singh A, Arjaria S, Sinha A, Gupta S. ToLeD: Tomato Leaf Disease Detection using Convolution Neural Network. Procedia Computer Science. 2020;167:293-301. Doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.225 [ Links ]

32. Devaraj A, Rathan K, Jaahnavi S, Indira K. Identification of plant disease using image processing technique. In: Proc Int Conf Commun Signal Process. (ICCSP). China: IEEE; 2019. p. 749-53. Doi: 10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698056 [ Links ]

33. Francis J, Sahaya A, Dhas D, Anoop BK. Identification of leaf diseases in pepper plants using soft computing techniques. In: 2016 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS). India: IEEE; 2016. p. 168-73. Doi: 10.1109/ICEDSS.2016.7587787 [ Links ]

34. Phadikar S, Sil J. Rice disease identification using pattern recognition techniques. In: Proc 11th Int Conf Comput Inf Technol (ICCIT). USA: IEEE; 2008. p. 420-23. Doi: 10.1109/ICCITECHN.2008.4803079 [ Links ]

35. Raiu R, Subburaman A, Haribabu S. Shrub Ailment Recognization Using Advanced Image Processing. In: 7th Int Conf Comput Power, Energy, Inf Commun (ICCPEIC). Melmaruvathur: IEEE; 2018. p. 215-20. Doi: 10.1109/ICCPEIC.2018.8525159 [ Links ]

36. Ikhwan AN, Kamal M. Digital image processing technique for palm oil leaf disease detection using multiclass SVM classifier. In: Int Conf Smart Instrumentation, Meas Appl (ICSIMA). Malasya: IEEE; 2017. p. 1-6. Doi: 10.1109/ICSIMA.2017.8311978 [ Links ]

37. Prajapati BS, Dabhi VK, Prajapati HB. A survey on detection and classification of cotton leaf diseases. In: Int Conf Electr Electron Optim Tech (ICEEOT). India: IEEE; 2016. p. 2499-06. Doi: 10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7755143 [ Links ]

38. Jiao L, Dong S, Zhang S, Xie C, Wang H. AF-RCNN: An anchor-free convolutional neural network for multi-categories agricultural pest detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;174:105522. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105522 [ Links ]

39. Kantale P, Thakare S. A Review on Pomegranate Disease Classification Using Machine Learning and Image Segmentation Techniques. In: Proc Int Conf Intell Comput Control Syst (ICICCS). India: IEEE; 2020. p. 455-60. Doi: 10.1109/ICICCS48265.2020.9121161 [ Links ]

40. Thenmozhi K, Srinivasulu U. Image processing techniques for insect shape detection in field crops. In: Proc Int Conf Inven Comput Informatics (ICICI). India: IEEE; 2017. p. 699-04. Doi: 10.1109/ICICI.2017.8365226 [ Links ]

41. Li Y, Wang H, Dang LM, Sadeghi-Niaraki M, Moon H. Crop pest recognition in natural scenes using convolutional neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;169:105174. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105174 [ Links ]

42. Preetha B, Radhakrishnan L, Suresh P. Detection and classification of pests from crop images using Support Vector Machine. In: Proc Int Conf Emerg Technol Trends Comput Commun Electr Eng (ICETT). India: IEEE; 2016. p. 99-04. Doi: 10.1109/ICETT.2016.7873750 [ Links ]

43. Al-Amin M, Dewan Ziaul K, Tasfia Anika B. Prediction of rice disease from leaves using deep convolution neural network towards a digital agricultural system. In: 22nd Int Conf Comput Inf Technol (ICCIT). Bangladesh: IEEE; 2019. p. 18-20. Doi: 10.1109/ICCIT48885.2019.9038229 [ Links ]

44. Patil JK, Kumar R. Feature extraction of diseased leaf images. Journal of Signal and Image Processing. 2012;3(1):65-71. [ Links ]

45. Xiong Y, Liang L, Wang L, She J, Wu M. Identification of cash crop diseases using automatic image segmentation algorithm and deep learning with expanded dataset. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;177:105712. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105712 [ Links ]

46. Roldán-Serrato KL, Escalante-Estrada JAS, Rodríguez-González MT. Automatic pest detection on bean and potato crops by applying neural classifiers. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food. 2018;11(4):245-55. Doi: 10.1016/j.eaef.2018.08.003 [ Links ]

47. Khan MA, Akram T, Sharif M, Awais M, Javed K, Ali H, Saba T. CCDF: Automatic system for segmentation and recognition of fruit crops diseases based on correlation coefficient and deep CNN features. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018;155:220-36. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.013 [ Links ]

48. Wan-Soo K, Dae-Hyun L, Yong-Joo K. Machine vision-based automatic disease symptom detection of onion downy mildew. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;168:105099. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105099 [ Links ]

49. Konstantinos PF. Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018;145:311-18. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.01.009 [ Links ]

50. Nanni L, Maguolo G, Pancino F. Insect pest image detection and recognition based on bio-inspired methods. Ecological Informatics. 2020;57:101089. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101089 [ Links ]

51. Xie C, Zhang J, Li R, Li J, Hong P, Xia J, Chen P. Automatic classification for field crop insects via multiple-task sparse representation and multiple-kernel learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2015;119:123-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.10.015 [ Links ]

52. Cheng X, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Wu Y, Yue Y. Pest identification via deep residual learning in complex background. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2017;141:351-56. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.08.005 [ Links ]

53. Roldan-Serrato L, Tetyana Kussul B, Escalante-Estrada A, Gonzales Rodriguez M. Recognition of pests on crops with a random subspace classifier. In: Int Work Conf Bio-Inspired Intell Intell Syst Biodivers Conserv Proc (IWOBI). USA: IEEE; 2015. p. 21-26. Doi: 10.1109/IWOBI.2015.7160138 [ Links ]

54. Bollis E, Pedrini E, Avila S. Weakly supervised learning guided by activation mapping applied to a novel citrus pest benchmark. In: Conf on Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPRW). USA: IEEE; 2020. P. 310-19. Doi: 10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00043 [ Links ]

55. Castelão E, Brandoli B, Astolfi G, Alessandro N, Paraguassu W, Railda A. et. al. Detection and classification of soybean pests using deep learning with UAV images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2020;179:105836. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105836 [ Links ]

56. Ebrahimi MA, Khoshtaghaza MH, Minaei S, Jamshidi B. Vision-based pest detection based on SVM classification method. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2017;137:52-58. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.03.016 [ Links ]

57. Zhang J, Huang Y, Pu R, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Yuan L, Wu K. et al. Monitoring plant diseases and pests through remote sensing technology: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019;165:104943. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.104943 [ Links ]

58. Sankaran S, Mishra A, Ehsani R, Davis C. A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2010;72(1):1-13. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.02.007 [ Links ]

59. Bürling K, Hunsche M, Noga G. Use of blue-green and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements for differentiation between nitrogen deficiency and pathogen infection in winter wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2011;168(14):1641-48. Doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.03.016 [ Links ]

60. Zhenchuan Y, Congshun W, Guizhen Y, Yilong H, Guoying W. A bulk micromachined lateral axis gyroscope with vertical sensing comb capacitors. In: 13th International Conference on Solid State Sensors Actuators Microsystems, 2005, Digest of Technical Papers. TRANSDUCERS '05. 2005;1121-24. Doi: 10.1109/SENSOR.2005.1496374 [ Links ]

61. Barbedo J, Tibola C, Fernandes J. Detecting Fusarium head blight in wheat kernels using hyperspectral imaging. Biosystems Engineering. 2015;131:65-76. Doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.01.003 [ Links ]

62. Galed G, Fernández-Valle ME, Martínez A, Heras A. Application of MRI to monitor the process of ripening and decay in citrus treated with chitosan solutions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2004;22(1):127-37. Doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.05.006 [ Links ]

Received: January 30, 2021; Accepted: May 20, 2021

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License