SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue1Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of persons with suspected vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)Characterization of Kawasaki disease in children between 3 months and 15 years in 2 health institutions in Bogotá, Colombia author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Infectio

Print version ISSN 0123-9392

Infect. vol.26 no.1 Bogotá Jan./Mar. 2022  Epub Nov 13, 2021

https://doi.org/10.22354/in.v26i1.988 

ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL

Bacterial diversity analysis of freshwater sources for human use in rural areas of the tropical Andean region of Colombia

Análisis de la diversidad bacteriana en aguas superficiales usadas para consumo humano en zonas rurales de la región andina colombiana

Katherine Bedoya1  2 

Laila Galeano3  4 

Margarita M. Hincapié3  5 

Jairo A. Mesa1 

Juan F. Alzate1  6  * 

1 Centro Nacional de Secuenciación Genómica - CNSG, Universidad de Antio quia -UdeA, Medellín, Colombia Carrera 53 # 61 - 30, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.

2 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-7373

3 Universidad de Medellín, Facultad de Ingeniería, Medellín, Colombia. Cra. 87 #30-65, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.

4 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5467-9958

5 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3009-8312

6 Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Uni versidad de Antioquia -UdeA, Cra. 51d #62-29, Medellín, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-4609


Abstract

Potable water supply and sanitization in rural areas in developing countries are still inadequate. The main risk associated with unsafe drinking water is the infection with pathogenic microorganisms. Objective: In this study, we investigate the bacterial diversity and the potentially pathogenic bacteria in water samples from diffe rent points of distribution in three rural villages from the Andean region of Colombia. Methods: Illumina libraries for water samples were prepared and sequenced using 300 bp paired-end MiSeq protocol, the bioinformatic analyses were performed with Mothur pipeline and the phyloseq package in Rstudio. Results: The mi crobial community composition showed statistically significant differences according to the village and the sample origin. Alpha, Beta, and Gammaproteobacteria were the dominant class detected in all water samples. The most relevant pathogenic genera detected in the surface were Legionella, Mycobacterium, Yersinia, Burkholderia, and Rickettsia. In the tap water samples, potential pathogens like Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Nocardia, and Escherichia/Shige lla were detected.

Keywords: drinking water; pathogenic bacteria; Colombian village; microbiota; metataxonomics

Resumen

El suministro y potabilización del agua de consumo humano en las zonas rurales de los países en vías de desarrollo sigue siendo limitado. El principal riesgo asociado con el uso de agua no potable es la infección con microorganismos patógenos. Objetivo: En este estudio se investigó la diversidad bacteriana y la presencia de bacterias potencialmente patógenas en muestras de agua de diferentes puntos de distribución en tres asentamientos rurales de la región andina de Colombia. Métodos: Se prepararon y secuenciaron bibliotecas de amplicones (rDNA 16S) para muestras de agua utilizando la plataforma Illumina MiSeq con lecturas pareadas de 300 bases. Los análisis bioinformáticos se realizaron con el programa Mothur y el paquete estadístico Phyloseq en Rstudio. Resultados: La composición de la comunidad microbiana mostró diferencias estadísticamente significativas según el sitio y el origen de la muestra. Alfa, Beta y Gammaproteobac terias fueron las clase dominantes detectadas en todas las muestras de agua. Los géneros patógenos más relevantes detectados fueron Legionella, Mycobacterium, Yersinia, Burkholderia y Rickettsia. En las muestras de agua del grifo se detectaron patógenos potenciales como Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Nocardia y Escherichia /Shigella.

Palabras clave: Metataxonómica; diversidad bacteriana; aguas superficiales; aguas de consumo humano no tratadas; 16S rDNA

Introduction

Access to safe drinking water and sanitization is still a public health problem in South America and the Caribbean. Accor ding to the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), 28 million people lack access to an improved water source and 83 million people lack access to improved sanitation facili ties1. Low coverage and quality services are more common and evident in low-income, vulnerable groups, and rural po pulations2. Pathogenic microorganisms are the most critical risk factor related to drinking water3. The main bacterial ge nera involved in waterborne diseases are enteric pathogens including Vibrio, Salmonella, Shigella, Escherichia, Campylo bacter, among others4.

Most of the studies related to the drink water quality as sessment have been performed using culture-dependent methods to identify indicator pathogens controlled in the drinking water regulation laws5. The advent of high through put DNA sequencing techniques provides a powerful broad-spectrum and high-resolution tool for microbiota as sessment in different types of environmental samples6. In this way, using metagenomic analysis tools, Kaestli et al. studied Australian water samples from drinking water distribution systems of three indigenous communities and successfully reported bacterial genera associated with fecal coliforms and other intestinal pathogens such as Clostridium, Cam pylobacter, Corynebacterium, Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium, Legionella, Burkholderia, and Leptospira7. In another report, 24 pathogenic and opportunistic bacterial species were de tected in water samples using a metataxonomic approach in a rural area from Haiti in which Klebsiella spp was the most frequent pathogen8. In general, the microbial diversity of drinking water in Latin America has been poorly characteri zed. Using novel NGS/metataxonomic technologies it will be possible to observe both environmental microbiota as well common coliform pathogens and other bacterial pathogens not included in the actual water regulation laws8.

In Colombia, 78% of the population has access to drinking water. However, the rural areas are at high risk since the 45,2% of the rural water purification plants show quality fai lures10. The Colombian Ministry of Health reports that about 1,300 children die each year from diarrheal diseases caused by drinking unsafe quality water9. In this regard, the govern ment objectives include the universal and equitable access to safe drinking water. Nonetheless, the monitoring of indicator pathogens (E. coli and fecal coliforms) is mainly realized in urban areas10. A report of the Colombian Ministry of Health informed that E. coli and fecal coliforms were detected in 23,8% and 32,9% of water samples collected in rural and ur ban areas, respectively.

In the current study, we explored the bacterial diversity of the river intake water and tap water collected from three villages in the Andean region of Colombia, using 16S rDNA sequen cing. These communities obtain water by collecting it from surface water of nearby rivers and storing it in improvised tanks, and, in most cases, the water is not treated with any chemical or physical methods before it gets to its final con sumers. Bacterial pathogens were detected in the tap water, this could affect the health of the communities.

Materials and Methods

Study area and sampling

This study was conducted in the rural area from three muni cipalities of the Antioquia Department within the Andean re gion of Colombia: Village El Carmelo (El Peñol municipality), village Curiti (Liborina municipality) and village La Linda (Jar din) (Table 1). All the villages are located in the department of Antioquia (Fig.1).

Table 1 Description of the water samples collected in the different villages and distribution site 

Figure 1 Maps representing the point of sampling in the municipality Jardin, El Peñol and Liborina 

  • The municipality of Liborina is located in the middle west of the department of Antioquia (6 ° 40 ‘59’ ‘North, 75 ° 48’ 0 ‘’ West), the average temperature is 26 ° C, with an area of 217 km2, of which 99% corresponds to the rural area11, a total population of 10,028 people, of which 2,296 are located in the urban area and 7,732 in the rural area12. The drinking water coverage is 100% in the urban area and 35% in the rural area13. The rural community of Curiti is located in the southwest of the municipality of Liborina. This rural community has a water supply system without purification treatment, and they take their water from two rivers.

  • The municipality of El Peñol is located in the eastern sub-region of the department of Antioquia (6 ° 13 ‘08’ ‘North, 75 ° 14’ 31 ‘’ West). El Peñol has a total area of 148 km2, an average annual temperature of 19 ° C14. The economy is based on agriculture with plantations of tomatoes, ba nanas, peas, beans, coffee, blackberries, cabbage, carrots, paprika, among others, as well as extensive livestock. The total population of El Peñol is 21,049 inhabitants, of which 11,022 and 10,027 make up its urban and rural population, respectively12. The potable water coverage is 100% in the urban areas, while in rural areas, it is 73%15. The village of El Carmelo is located to the south of the municipality, the inhabitants of the village do not have access to potable water.

  • The municipality of Jardin is located in the southwest region of the department of Antioquia (5 ° 36 ′ 0 ″ North, 75 ° 49 ′ 1 ″ West), the average temperatura is 19 ° Celsius. Its ex tension is 224 km2. Its total population is 14,518 inhabitants, distributed in 7,659, in the urban area and 6,859 in the rural area12. Its mountainous topography characterizes Jardin. Its economy’s base is a tourism and the cultivation of beans, sugar cane, cassava, potatoes, avocado, corn, and coffee. Its coverage in terms of drinking water is 99% in urban and rural areas, only in some rural communities there are water treatments by filtration and chlorination16. The rural com munity of La Linda is located 3 km from the municipality.

The water for human consumption in these communities is pumped from surface sources (rivers) into storage tanks without any treatment, except for Jardin in which there are improvised filters (without routine maintenance) for treating the water before the storage. In this study the selected sam pling points were the water intake, the storage tank, tap wa ter in the houses, and the town’s downstream river. A total of 18 water samples were collected on January 2020. Ten liters of water were collected from each sampling site using clean, non-sterilized containers with a screw cap and transported on ice to the laboratory. The intake and downstream water sam ples were taken in the middle part and at a depth between 5 and 20 cm, the tank and tap water were taken through PVC pipes. The specifications of the Institute of Meteorology, Hy drology and Environmental Studies (IDEAM) and the British standard were followed for the sampling: Part 2: Guidance on sampling techniques and ISO 5667-3 Preservation and handling of simple water. (BRITISH STANDARD. Water qua lity -Sampling Part 2: Guidance on sampling techniques. BS EN 25667-2:1993 BS 6068-6.2:1991 ISO 5667-2: 1991 Incor porating Amendment No. 1). The water was filtered through membrane disc filters with a pore size of 0.22mm to ensures the biomass quantity for DNA recovery (Membrane MCE 0.20um 47mm. Advantech MFS).

DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, genomic DNA was extracted directly from membrane filters within the first 24 h of sampling using DNAeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Ger many). DNA was quantified using the fluorescent probe Pico Green (Invitrogen P11496) and DNA quality was assessed by gel electrophoresis (1% agarose).

Samples were normalized to a final concentration of 10 ng/μL. Illumina libraries were prepared and sequenced using 300 bp paired-end MiSeq protocol at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) following the service provider recommendations. The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of bacterial and archaeal 16S rDNA gene were amplified with the primers Bakt_341F (5′- CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and Bakt_805R (5′- GACTA CHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). Forward and reverse primers con tained the Illumina adapter, pad and linker sequences.

Bioinformatics análisis

The Sequences were analyzed using Mothur’s pipeline ac cording to Miseq standard operating procedure (SOP) 17. Briefly, Paired-end (PE) reads were assembled using Mothur’s tool “make.contigs” and then aligned to the SILVA 16S rDNA reference database. Sequences with ambiguous bases or ho mopolymers longer than 6 bases were removed. VSEARCH algorithm was used to filtering chimeric sequences. Nonbac terial lineages (chloroplasts, mitochondria, archaea and eu karyotes) were removed. Mothur’s subroutine “dist.seqs” was used for clustering reads into operational taxonomic unit (OTU) at a nucleotide identity limit of 0.03. Data were norma lized with the “totalgroup” method and rare OTUs with less than 3 sequences were removed. The phylogenetic classifi cation was obtained with the Classifier Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) tool (80 bootstrap threshold) 18. The micro bial diversity was calculated with the R package Phyloseq and Vegan. The Alpha diversity measurements including Chao1, observed species, Simpson, and Shannon index, were cal culated for each sample. Beta diversity was calculated using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), the distance method was bray. The Core community was calculated with the R package microbiome according to the core microbiota analysis using amplicon data.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Analysis was made through R v3.6.2 in RStudio and Phyloseq package. Statistical significance was considered when the P-value was less than 0.05 with the non-parametric tests Kruskal-Wallis, pairwise Wilcoxon and Analysis of va riance using distance matrices (Adonis).

Accession number of sequences

Raw sequences were deposited in the SRA NCBI database under the bio project access number PRJNA662790.

Results

Alpha and Beta diversity analysis

An average of 33,904 sequences per sample was obtained af ter the quality filtering (low quality, chimeras, and nonbacte rial origin), ranging from 32,813 to 34,607. Good’s coverage estimator was between 88% and 99% for all the samples in dicating an appropriate sampling effort for capturing most of the bacterial diversity. The rarefaction curves showed a good depth of sequencing (Fig. 2) The sequences were clustered into 35,236 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) with 97% identity. The richness and diversity index were performed ac cording to the village (Fig. 3) and sample origin (Fig. 4). These results showed a higher diversity in the intake water, but this observation was significant only for the observed index com paring the Carmelo (7333 OTUs observed) and Curiti (5856 OTUs observed) villages (p=0.045).

Figure 2 Rarefaction curves of the samples according to the village 

Figure 3 Alpha diversity indices in the water samples collected in three rural villages from Colombia. ACE (abundance-based coverage estimator). The OTUs observed index showed statistically significant differences between the villages Curiti and Carmelo, panel A (p<0.05). 

Figure 4 Alpha diversity in the water samples collected at four distribution points in the distribution network. ACE (abundance-based coverage estimator) 

The non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis based on Bray-Curtis distance was applied for inferring the variations within the bacterial community structure grouping according to village or sample origin (Fig. 5). The stress value was 0.079. The obtained results showed a clustering of the bacterial community according to the village in the NMDS ordination space. Also, we detected a separation according to sample origin. This observation was supported by the Adonis test (p=0.001).

Figure 5 Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot showing differences in microbial composition in water samples according to the village and distribution point of collection. 

Taxonomic composition in water samples

The Bacterial community structure was classified into 33 phyla dominated by Proteobacteria (42.5 to 67.32%) Bacteroidetes (1.88 to 23.68%), Actinobacteria (1.15 to 12.08%), and Aci dobacteria (0.67 to 5.06%). A large proportion of sequences could not be effectively classified (3.84 to 25.17%) by the RDP classifier at 0.8 bootstrap threshold. We observed diffe rences in the abundances of phyla according to the village and sample origin (Fig. 6). The sample collected in the intake water from Liborina village (CUIW) showed higher frequen cy in Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria phyla compared with the other samples. The core community was represented by 19 phyla detected in all villages included in the study. The frequency of Fusobacteria was higher in downstream water after the domestic activity from La Linda village (0.93%). Besi des, this village showed a higher frequency of the candidate phylum WPS-2 (1.12%).

Figure 6 Top 10 of the bacterial community composition in the water samples at phylum level 

At the genus level, 619 genera were effectively classified in all samples. The dominant genera detected, belonging to Proteobacteria, were Rhodoferax and Pseudomonas (Fig. 7). Flavobacterium belonging to the Bacteroidetes phylum was the most frequent genus classified in the downstream water from La Linda village. Bacterial genera residing in the human intestinal tract were detected in fewer frequencies. However, we observed an enrichment of Prevotella and Paludibacter in the downstream water from La Linda Village.

Figure 7 Top 10 of the bacterial community composition in the water samples at genus level 

Microbial pathogen analyses

Potentially pathogenic genera were identified in all the samples collected at different distribution points in the three villages, with differences in their frequencies (Fig. 8). Legionella, Myco bacterium, Yersinia, Burkholderia and Rickettsia were the domi nant pathogenic genera reported in the surface water and water tank from La Linda village. These genera persisted in the tap wa ter of two houses. Notably, the downstream water in this village was dominated by Aeromonas that was less frequent in the in take water. A higher frequency of some potentially pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium and Treponema was detected in the tap water from Carmelo village compared with the intake water and the water tank; this might suggest contamination in the pipeline. The water tank from Curiti village showed a higher frequency of Leptospira, Es cherichia/Shigella, Bordetella, and Serratia. However, we obser ved a reduction in the frequencies of these bacterial genera in the houses’ tap water with no apparent explanation.

Figure 8 Heatmap showing the bacterial genus potentially pathogens detected in the water simples 

Discussion

This study analyzed the bacterial microbiota from source, storage, tap water, and downstream water from three An dean rural communities in Colombia. The variations in the bacterial diversity within different rivers related to the geo graphical localization have been reported previously (figure 2) (19. This observation confirmed our results since the beta-diversity Analysis showed a separation in the bacterial popu lations according to the village. Our results also demonstrate the tremendous bacterial diversity present in the tropical An dean region’s freshwater sources and the lack of knowledge of these bacterial communities due to the high frequency of unclassified bacteria detected in this study20.

The dominant phylum classified in all the studied samples was Proteobacteria (figure 5); this phylum was previously re ported as dominant in several types of freshwater ecosys tems and groundwater21. As in this study, Alpha, Beta, and Gammaproteobacteria were detected in the tap water produ ced from freshwater in Portugal and France22,23. The persis tence of Alphaproteobacteria in drinking water is related to their capability to survive in low levels of nutrients and the chlorine tolerance23. Gammaproteobacteria comprises known pathogenic species belonging to the families Enterobacteria ceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Legionellaceae and Aeromonada ceae. Members of Burkholderiaceae and Comamonadaceae belonging to Betaproteobacteria have been reported in drin king water, thanks to their capacity to their efficient stress response and biofilm formation24.

Safe water supply improves the quality of life in the com munities; however, in the villages included in this study, the water is carried to the houses from a river without any appro priate chemical or physical treatment. The impact of anthro pogenic activities on water quality in these communities is related mainly to agriculture and domestic wastes. For this reason, microbiological contamination of the water sources is a relevant issue for these communities. Pathogens were detected in all phases of the improvised water distribution systems of these villages (figure 7). Our results are in concor dance with the observations of20, that reported dominance of Pseudomonas, Mycobacterium and Aeromonas in the surface water from several districts in Beijing.

Aeromonas presence in the intake water and downstream water in La Linda village in high frequency is a reason for public health concern because this bacterium is considered an emerging pathogen, especially in emerging economies25. Members of the genus have been isolated from aquatic ha bitats or inside various vertebrate hosts, including humans, fish, frogs, and crustaceans26. In humans, Aeromonas is res ponsible for gastrointestinal disturbances, septicemia, endo carditis, pneumonia, and conjunctivitis27. The high reports of Aeromonas in drinking water supplies are related to its capa city to colonize biofilms and resist the chlorine treatment28. Aeromonas has been isolated from surface water, ground water, chlorinated drinking water, and bottled mineral water in several countries such as Brazil29. Despite of the health sig nificance of Aeromonas infections, no routine monitoring of water supplies searching this bacterium is performed.

Storage tanks are essential components of the water distri bution systems and, if not properly maintained and sanitized, it can increase the risk to human health since the long stag nation times of drinking water could foster the risk of infec tion with pathogenic bacteria30. Previous studies have repor ted the presence of Pseudomonas, Legionella, and coliforms in storage tanks30. These observations are consistent with our results in which Escherichia/Shigella and Yersinia were detec ted in higher proportion in water storage tanks. Leptospira also was detected in a storage tank from Curiti village; this bacterium has been isolated from drinking water mainly in areas where sanitization is insufficient31.

In this study, the tap water showed a high frequency of Legione lla, this genus comprises 59 species, most of them are of aquatic origin32. Potable water is the most important source of pathoge nic species of Legionella related with lung infections33. This bac terium was detected in drinking water from Germany at tem peratures above 50oC and have been associated with biofilm formed in water piping. Legionnaire’s disease outbreaks have been reported around the world. In these cases, the primary in fection route is the inhalation of contaminated aerosols from drinking water, whirlpool spas, and cooling towers34.

Thirty potentially pathogenic bacterial genera were detected in the tap water of the three studied villages, some of them at significant abundance. This observation might help us un derstand the hazardous situation in which these people lives, and that this lack of safe drinking water could explain, at least in part, the burden of the enteric diseases of these popula tions. Despite in this study we do not perform viability test, this result could be an indicator of contamination because the DNA of dead cells is degraded in the environment and is less probable to detected through the sequencing platforms. To assess the real risk viability test should be performed. Pathogens such as Escherichia/Shigella, Yersinia and Leptospi ra pose a great threat to human health, especially to the chil dren in these villages, and are consumed on a regular basis in the drinking water by these communities. The pathogens reported in the tap water from La Linda village could indicate that the improvised water filtration systems and without rou tine maintenance offer no improvement in the water quality. This situation causes the final consumer to be exposed to the intake of water contaminated with pathogenic microor ganisms such as E. Coli, total and fecal coliforms, Aeromonas, and others, which generate adverse effects on human health.

References

1. Pan American Health Organization. Agua saneamiento. 2020. https://www.paho.org/es/temas/agua-saneamiento. [ Links ]

2. Orach CG. Health equity: challenges in low income countries. Afr Health Sci 2009; 9 Suppl 2:49-51. [ Links ]

3. Pandey PK, Kass PH, Soupir ML, Biswas S, Singh VP. 2014. Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria. AMB Express 4:1-16. [ Links ]

4. Cabral JPS. 2010. Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7:3657-3703. [ Links ]

5. Bae S, Lyons C, Onstad N. 2019. A culture-dependent and metagenomic approach of household drinking water from the source to point of use in a developing country. Water Res X 2:100026. [ Links ]

6. Motlagh AM, Yang Z. 2019. Detection and occurrence of indicator organisms and pathogens. Water Environ Res 91:1402-1408. [ Links ]

7. Kaestli M, O’Donnell M, Rose A, Webb JR, Mayo M, Currie BJ, Gibb K. 2019. Opportunistic pathogens and large microbial diversity detected in source-to-distribution drinking water of three remote communities in Northern Australia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13:1-23. [ Links ]

8. Mukherjee N, Bartelli D, Patra C, Chauhan B V., Dowd SE, Banerjee P. 2016. Microbial diversity of source and point-of-use water in rural Haiti - A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic survey. PLoS One 11:1-16. [ Links ]

9. Cann KF, Thomas DR, Salmon RL, Wyn-Jones AP, Kay D. 2013. Extreme water-related weather events and waterborne disease. Epidemiol Infect 141:671-686. [ Links ]

10. Carlos J, Moreno B. 2013. Estado de la Vigilancia de la Calidad del Agua para Consumo Humano en Colombia Estado de la Vigilancia de la Calidad del Director Redes en Salud Pública 2015. [ Links ]

11. Liborina M de. 1999. Municipio de Liborina, Proyecto de esquema de ordenamiento territorial - E.O.T. Municipio de Liborina. [ Links ]

12. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. 2018. www.dane.gov.co. [ Links ]

13. Henao Pulgarín OA. 2016. Municipio De Liborina Óscar Alveiro Henao Pulgarin Vn Sueño En El Que Todos Cabemos ’. [ Links ]

14. GRUPO GESTIÓN DEL RIESGO. 2012. Zonificación de riesgo por movimientos en masa inundación y avenidas torrenciales. atención de áreas afectadas por eventos desastrosos of control estratégico cornare.. [ Links ]

15. Ocampo F de J. 2015. Plan De Desarrollo 2012 - 2015 “El Peñol, Alcaldía Para Todos.” [ Links ]

16. Alcaldía Municipal de Jardín. 2016. Plan de Desarrollo de Jardín, Antioquia 2016-2019 “La Alcaldía que Quiere la Gente” 1-215. [ Links ]

17. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. 2009. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537-7541. [ Links ]

18. Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras- Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM. 2014. Ribosomal Database Project: Data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 42:633- 642. [ Links ]

19. Wang L, Zhang J, Li H, Yang H, Peng C, Peng Z, Lu L. 2018. Shift in the microbial community composition of surface water and sediment along an urban river. Sci Total Environ 627:600-612. [ Links ]

20. Jin D, Wang P, Bai Z, Wang X, Peng H, Qi R, Yu Z, Zhuang G. 2011. Analysis of bacterial community in bulking sludge using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. J Environ Sci 23:1880-1887. [ Links ]

21. Azmuda N, Fakruddin M, Khan SI, Birkeland NK. 2019. Bacterial community profiling of tropical freshwaters in Bangladesh. Front Public Heal 7:1-16. [ Links ]

22. Poitelon JB, Joyeux M, Welté B, Duguet JP, Prestel E, Lespinet O, DuBow MS. 2009. Assessment of phylogenetic diversity of bacterial microflora in drinking water using serial analysis of ribosomal sequence tags. Water Res 43:4197-4206. [ Links ]

23. Vaz-Moreira I, Nunes OC, Manaia CM. 2017. Ubiquitous and persistent Proteobacteria and other Gram-negative bacteria in drinking water. Sci Total Environ 586:1141-1149. [ Links ]

24. Ferro P, Vaz-Moreira I, Manaia CM. 2019. Betaproteobacteria are predominant in drinking water: are there reasons for concern? Crit Rev Microbiol 45:649-667. [ Links ]

25. Schuetz AN. 2019. Emerging agents of gastroenteritis: Aeromonas, Plesiomonas, and the diarrheagenic pathotypes of Escherichia coli. Semin Diagn Pathol 36:187-192. [ Links ]

26. Fernández-Bravo A, Figueras MJ. 2020. An update on the genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, epidemiology, and pathogenicity. Microorganisms. 8(1): 129 [ Links ]

27. Figueras Salvat MJ, Ashbolt N. 2016. AEROMONAS. Glob Water Pathog Proj 3-10. [ Links ]

28. Lynch MJ, Swift S, Kirke DF, Keevil CW, Dodd CER, Williams P. 2002. The regulation of biofilm development by quorum sensing in Aeromonas hydrophila. Environ Microbiol 4:18-28. [ Links ]

29. Razzolini MTP, Günther WMR, Martone-Rocha S, de Luca HD, Cardoso MRA. 2010. Aeromonas presence in drinking water from collective reservoirs and wells in peri-urban area in Brazil. Brazilian J Microbiol 41:694-699. [ Links ]

30. Peter A, Routledge E. 2018. Present-day monitoring underestimates the risk of exposure to pathogenic bacteria from cold water storage tanks. PLoS One 13:1-21. [ Links ]

31. Wynwood SJ, Graham GC, Weier SL, Collet TA, McKay DB, Craig SB. 2014. Leptospirosis from water sources. Pathog Glob Health 108:334-338. [ Links ]

32. Lesnik R, Brettar I, Höfle MG. 2016. Legionella species diversity and dynamics from surface reservoir to tap water: From cold adaptation to thermophily. ISME J 10:1064-1080. [ Links ]

33. Whiley H. 2016. Legionella risk management and control in potable water systems: Argument for the abolishment of routine testing. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(1):12 [ Links ]

34. MacIntyre CR, Dyda A, Bui CM, Chughtai AA. 2018. Rolling epidemic of Legionnaires’ disease outbreaks in small geographic areas article. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 36. [ Links ]

Cómo citar este artículo: K. Bedoya, et al. Bacterial diversity analysis of freshwater sources for human use in rural areas of the tropical Andean region of Colombia. Infectio 2022; 26(1): 11-18

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. This research do not use animal nor human material.

Confidentiality of data. Not data that enable identity of par ticipants was revealed

Financing. This study was funded by Universidad de Medellín and Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad de Antioquia

Received: March 01, 2021; Accepted: June 04, 2021

* Autor para correspondencia: Correo electrónico: jfernando.alzate@udea.edu.co Sede de Investigación Universitaria-SIU, Universidad de Antioquia, Carrera 53 # 61 - 30, CP 050010, Medellín, Colombia.

Conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no actual or po tential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations within three years of beginning the submitted work that could inap propriately influence, or be perceived to influence, their work.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License