SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número6Patrones alimentarios de adultos mayores en una región argentina y su relación con factores socioeconómicosCondiciones habitacionales y observación de triatominos como estimación de riesgo de domiciliación en Santa Rosalía, Vichada, Colombia índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de Salud Pública

versión impresa ISSN 0124-0064

Rev. salud pública vol.21 no.6 Bogotá nov./dic. 2019  Epub 22-Abr-2021

https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v21n6.76110 

Articles/Research

Socioeconomic and parasitological aspects in Quilombola communities in two of the oldest municipalities in Brazil

Aspectos socioeconómicos y parasitológicos en comunidades quilombolas en dos de los municipios más antiguos de Brasil

Alline M. Nunes Wildemberg Brauer1 

Débora Barreto Teresa Gradella2 

Anelise Andrade de Souza3 

Marco A. Andrade de Souza4 

1 AB: Bachelor of Pharmacy. M.Sc. Pharmaceutical Sciences. Brazilian Hospital Services Company. Salvador, Brazil. alline_brauer@hotmail.com

2 DB: Bachelor of Pharmacy. M.Sc. Biotechnology. Ph.D. Clinical Analysis. Department of Health Sciences. Federal University of Espírito Santo. São Mateus, Brazil. teresadhl4@gmail.com

3 AA: Bachelor of Nutrition. M.Sc. Health and Nutrition. Ph.D. Collective Health. Department of Clinical and Social Nutrition. Federal University of Ouro Preto. Brazil. anelise.souza@ufop.edu.br

4 MA: Bachelor of Pharmacy. M.Sc. Biological Sciences. Ph.D. Parasitology. Department of Health Sciences. Federal University of Espírito Santo. São Mateus, Brazil. marco.souza@ufes.br


ABSTRACT

Objective

To carry out a socioeconomic, demographic and parasitological evaluation of quilombola communities in two of the oldest municipalities in Brazil.

Material and Methods

Between December 2015 and June 2016, of the total of 231 residents of the communities, socioeconomic questionnaires were applied and fecal samples collected from 150 individuals were analyzed by spontaneous sedimentation method and the Kato-Katz method.

Results

It was observed that 95.3% (n=143) of the interviewees had piped water at their residence, and 76% (n=114) came from wells or springs; 85.3% (n=128) reported that the toilet drain was made in a rudimentary septic tank and 59.3% (n=89) reported having litter buried or burned, showing precarious conditions in basic sanitation. Still on socioeconomic aspects, 80.7% (n=121) of the individuals reported having access to the public health service. Parasitological tests were positive for 48% (n=72) of the analyzed samples, and 25% (n=18) had two or more parasites. The most frequent organism in the study population was the commensal Entamoeba coli (55.6%, n=40), followed by Ascaris lumbricoides (19.4%, n=14) and the commensal Endolimax nana (16.7%, n=12). The Poisson regression showed an increase of 1.59 in the prevalence of parasites for individuals who do not have access to the public health service, when compared to those who have access to these services.

Conclusions

The results indicate the need to implement public health measures in order to reduce, prevent and treat the parasitological condition of the population to obtain better conditions and quality of life.

Key Words: African Americans; population health; parasitology; epidemiology; South America (source: MeSH, NLM)

RESUMEN

Objetivo

Realizar una evaluación socioeconómica, demográfica y parasitológica de las comunidades quilombolas en dos de los municipios más antiguos de Brasil.

Materiales y Métodos

Entre diciembre de 2015 y junio de 2016, del total de 231 residentes de las comunidades, se aplicaron cuestionarios socioeconómicos y se analizaron muestras fecales de 150 individuos mediante el método de sedimentación espontánea y el método Kato-Katz.

Resultados

Se observó que el 95,3% (n=143) de los entrevistados tenían agua entubada en su residencia y el 76% (n=114) provenía de pozos o manantiales; El 85,3% (n=128) informó que el desagüe del inodoro se realizó en un tanque séptico rudimentario y el 59,3% (n=89) informó que tenía basura enterrada o quemada, que mostraba condiciones precarias en el saneamiento básico. Aún en aspectos socioeconómicos, el 80,7% (n=121) de las personas reportaron tener acceso al servicio de salud pública. Las pruebas parasitológicas fueron positivas para el 48% (n=72) de las muestras analizadas, y el 25% (n=18) tenía dos o más parásitos. El organismo más frecuente en la población de estudio fue el comensal Entamoeba coli (55.6%, n=40), seguido de Ascaris lumbricoides (19.4%, n=14) y el comensal Endolimax nana (16.7%, n=12). La regresión de Poisson mostró un aumento de 1,59 en la prevalencia de parásitos para las personas que no tienen acceso al servicio de salud pública, en comparación con aquellos que tienen acceso a estos servicios.

Conclusión

Los resultados indican la necesidad de implementar medidas de salud pública para reducir, prevenir y tratar la condición parasitológica de la población para obtener mejores condiciones y calidad de vida.

Palabras Clave: Afroamericanos; salud poblacional; parasitología; epidemiología; América del Sur (fuente: DeCS, BIREME)

From the sixteenth century, black populations arrived in Brazil on expeditions brought from the African continent in the holds of slave ships, in the condition of slaves. Blacks were treated as inferior beings and subjected to poor living conditions, various forms of violence and overwork, factors that triggered episodes of resistance and struggle against the slave rule 1,2.

The history of slaves is characterized by innumerable social movements and actions that were based on the intense search for freedom, regardless of the means used to achieve it: escape, negotiation with lords, donation and, in some extreme cases, suicide and abortion as well were practiced. The escape was seen by the slaves as the main form of survival, and it culminated in the formation of quilombos which, according to their Bantu etymology, are defined as fortified camps in the forest 1,3-6.

With the abolition of slavery, they came to be known as quilombola communities or quilombo remnant com-munities, which present "a historical trajectory of their own, endowed with specific territorial relations and with black ancestry related to the resistance to the historical oppression suffered" 6,7.

After Africa, Brazil is considered the country with the largest contingent of black population, and this prominent presence has led to a change in the State's attitude towards the racial issue. Many researchers consider the Federal Constitution of 1988 as an important landmark for the social changes that occurred in the country, since it instituted the criminalization of racism and all forms of discrimination, besides recognizing the lands of quilombola communities as definitive property 1,8,9.

Since then, many laws, programs, operational strategies, actions and public policies have been instituted to protect the black population and reduce racial inequality in the country, guaranteeing the black population and residents of quilombola communities access to health, improvements in environmental protection, basic sanitation, comprehensive health care, food and nutritional security 10.

However, it is still possible to observe in these communities a scenario marked by socioeconomic marginalization and precarious living and health conditions; quilombola dwellers deal with high poverty rates that are reflected in several ways, among them, difficulty in accessing health services, lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality 1,11,12. It is observed that the legal rights of quilombola communities do not correspond to their effectiveness, and this is often due to the scarcity of studies that are not only demographic, but also epidemiological, which help in a suitable formulation, institution and execution. On the other hand, some researchers have identified this need and have carried out research in quilombola communities, in order to collect socioeconomic data and health indicators of these populations 1,13.

Socioeconomic assessment can illustrate the conditions and quality of life of a population. Quilombola com-munities are usually referred to as vulnerable in relation to the disease/health process, since they have precarious health and infrastructure conditions, where the vast majority do not have adequate homes, treated water and sanitary sewage 14,15.

In fact, this socioeconomic reality is directly related to the transmission of intestinal parasites, since low sanitary conditions, associated with inadequate domestic and personal hygiene practices, are determining factors in the development and propagation of parasitic diseases 16-18.

Parasitic diseases are infections caused by the presence of protozoa or helminths in the intestinal tract, who-se transmission mainly occurs via the fecal-oral route, through the ingestion of contaminated food or water and inadequate hygiene practices. Brazil has several endemic areas with a high prevalence of parasitic diseases, constituting a serious public health problem 19-21.

Besides the association with socioeconomic conditions, researchers relate the high frequency of parasitosis with the ease of transmission, the resistance of the infecting forms, and the possibility of triggering reinfection cycles. The clinical manifestations of parasitic diseases can increase morbidity rates and, in more severe situations, lead to the death of infected individuals, which makes the knowledge of this reality relevant in different population groups 16,18,22,23.

In this context and considering that quilombola com-munities are constantly associated with poor basic sanitation conditions 1,11,14,15, this study aimed to evaluate socioeconomic and parasitological aspects in quilombola communities located in the Northern region of Espírito Santo.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study with a quantitative approach and non-probabilistic convenience sample conducted in five quilombola communities (Angelim DISA, Córrego do Alexandre, Córrego do Macuco, Nova Vista and São Jorge), located in the municipalities of São Mateus and Conceição da Barra, Northern region of Espírito Santo, Brazil. The population of the municipality of São Mateus is estimated at 109,028 inhabitants, distributed in an area of 2,338.727 Km2, with a population density of 46.62 inhabitants/Km2, and a Human Develop Index (HDI) of 0,735. The municipality of Conceição da Barra has a population of 28,449 inhabitants, distributed in 1,184.908 Km2, with a population density of 24.01 in-habitants/Km2 and HDI of 0.681 24.

Socioeconomic data and fecal samples were collected between December 2015 and June 2016. A total of 500 residents of quilombola communities were contacted to participate in the study. Of these, only 150 (30%) accepted to participate, and gave stool samples and answered the questionnaire. Parasitological analyses were per-formed using qualitative spontaneous sedimentation methods proposed by Hoffman, Pons and Janer (HPJ), and the Kato-Katz semi-quantitative method, in triplicate and duplicate, respectively 25-27. A single faecal sample was collected from an individual subject. The results of the parasitological examinations were given to each participant or legal guardian. The data obtained, systematized in a Microsoft Excel 2007 spreadsheet and typed twice, were analyzed using the software STATA, version 12.0. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Pearson chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Poisson regression analysis, respectively. The dependent variable chosen for this study was "Parasitosis". The independent variables were chosen among other socioeconomic and demographic variables included in the National household sample survey questionnaire 28, and those that presented statistical significance (p<0.20) in the Pearson chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were included in the Poisson regression model. The Prevalence Ratio was obtained and a confidence interval of 95% (p<0.05) was adopted in the final model. The questionnaire presents questions related to socioeconomic, demographic and health variables such as gender, skin color, age, what kind of material predominates on the roof of the houses, how many rooms are in the house, whether the residence has piped water, how the garbage family is income, and whether residents have access to health care.

Ethics statement

The study was initially evaluated and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Federal University of Espírito Santo, under N° CAAE: 47999915.1.0000.5063. The participants of the research were oriented on the objectives of the study and, through the agreement, they signed an Informed Consent Term (TCLE). The participants were adults and minors and for the minors the parents or guardians provided consent on behalf of all child participants.

RESULTS

From a total of 150 stool specimens analyzed, considering the methods of Spontaneous Sedimentation and Kato-Katz, 48.0% (n=72) were positive for intestinal parasites, out of them 75.0% (n=54) monoparasite and 25.0% (n=18) biparasite/polyparasite, presenting two or more species of parasites. Among the positive samples, protozoa were found in 72.2% (n=52) and helminths in 41.6% (n=30). On the other hand 13.8% (n=10) of the samples had parasites of both groups.

The commensal Entamoeba coli was the most frequent among the samples (55.6%, n=40), followed by Ascaris lumbricoides and by the commensal ENDOLIMAX nana, present in 19.4% (n=14) and 16.7% (n=12), respectively. The complete prevalence of parasitic species is described in (Table 1).

Table 1 Prevalence of intestinal and commensal parasites in quilombola communities in the Northern region of Espírito Santo, Brazil, in 2016 

Parasites N %*
Ascaris lumbricoides 14 19.4
Hookworm 7 9.7
Entamoeba coli 40 55.6
Entamoeba histolytica/dispar 8 11.1
Endolimax nana 12 16.7
Enterobius vermicularis 2 2.8
Hymenolepis nana 3 4.2
Trichuris trichiura 3 4.2
Taenia sp. 2 2.8
n=72

* The total % of the table is more than 100%. Some of the samples had co-infection and involved in more than one parasite infection percentage.

The Kato-Katz method allowed the identification of six kinds of intestinal parasites in 19 positive samples, some of which biparasite. When comparing the methods of spontaneous sedimentation and Kato-Katz it was observed that the Kato-Katz method was more specific for most of the helminths identified in the study (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of intestinal and commensal parasites in quilombola communities in the Northern region of Espírito Santo, Brazil, in 2016.Comparison between Spontaneous Sedimentation and Kato-Katz methods 

Parasites Spontaneous sedimentation method Kato-Katz method
N % N %
A. lumbricoides 1 1.4 13 18.1
Hookworm 3 4.2 4 5.6
Entamoeba coli 40 55.6 0 0
Entamoeba histolytica/dispar 8 11.1 0 0
Endolimax nana 12 16.7 0 0
Enterobius vermicularis 2 2.8 0 0
Hymenolepis nana 2 2.8 1 1.4
Trichuris trichiura 1 1.4 2 2.8
Taenia sp. 0 0 2 2.8
n=72

Once the number of infected individuais was established, the number of parasites eggs per gram of feces (epg) per individual sample was determined, with values ranging from 24 to 14,808 epg. Of all infected individuais, 14 (73.68%) had low parasite load (up to 100 epg), none had intermediate parasite load (>100 and <400 epg) and 5 (26.32%) had high parasite load (above 400 epg) 29 (Table 3).

Table 3 Number of parasites eggs per gram (epg) per individuals sample in the Northern region of Espírito Santo, Brazil, in 2016 

a Parasites epg (feces)
1 Hookworm 24
Ascaris lumbricoides 24
2 Ascaris lumbricoides 24
3 Hymenolepis nana 24
4 Trichuris trichiura 72
5 Ascaris lumbricoides 48
Taenia sp. 48
6 Ascaris lumbricoides 24
7 Ascaris lumbricoides 8.7
8 Hookworm 24
9 Hookworm 24
10 Taenia sp. 24
11 Ascaris lumbricoides 24
12 Ascaris lumbricoides 1.5
13 Hookworm 24
14 Ascaris lumbricoides 11.1
Trichuris trichiura 72
15 Ascaris lumbricoides 14.8
16 Ascaris lumbricoides 2.1
17 Ascaris lumbricoides 9.2
18 Enterobius vermicularis 24
19 Ascaris lumbricoides 48

It was observed that intestinal parasites were more frequent in males (52.8%), black-skinned (76.4%) aged between 21 and 60 years old (50%). Regarding the socioeconomic conditions of the studied population, 95.3% have piped water, of which 76% come from a well or spring, 97.3% have a bathroom at home, 85.4% have a toilet drain made in a rudimentary septic tank and 59.3% reported having litter buried or burned. In addition, 40.7% report having a family income between two and three minimum wages and 80.7% report having access to the public health service (Table 4).

Table 4 Characterization, using Pearson chi-square test and Fisher's exact test of the general population and positive samples for intestinal parasites in quilombola communities in the Northern region of Espírito Santo, Brazil, in 2016 

General Sample (n1) Negative Sample (n2) Positive Sample (n3) p
Gender n % n % N % 0.76
Female 79 52.7 45 57.7 34 47.2
Male 71 47.3 33 42.3 38 52.8
Skin color
Yellow 1 0.7 0 0 1 1.4 0.008*
White 7 4.7 5 6.4 2 2.8
Black 103 68.6 48 61.6 55 76.4
Pardo 39 26.0 25 32.0 14 19.4
Age group
0-10 years old 27 18.0 10 12.8 17 23.6 0.01*
11-20 years old 15 10.0 10 12.8 5 6.9
21-60 years old 75 50.0 39 50.0 36 50.0
Above 60 years old 33 22.0 19 24.4 14 19.5
Wall Material
Masonry 148 98.7 78 100 70 97.2 0.25
Plywood 2 1.3 0 0 2 2.8
Roof material
Asbestos 123 82.0 64 82.1 59 81.9 0.22
Concrete 3 2.0 2 2.6 1 1.4
Roof tile 20 13.3 9 11.5 11 15.3
Wood 4 2.7 3 3.8 1 1.4
Number of rooms
Up to three 2 1.3 2 2.6 0 0 0.39
Four or more 148 98.7 76 97.4 72 100
Number of bedrooms
Up to two 56 37.3 32 41 24 33.3 0.55
Three or more 94 62.7 46 59 48 66.7
Piped water
Yes 143 95.3 76 97.4 67 93.1 0.35
No 7 4.7 2 2.6 5 6.9
Origin of water
Well or spring 114 76.0 58 74.4 56 77.8 0.33
General distribution network 35 23.3 20 25.6 15 20.8
Rain or transported 1 0.7 0 0 1 1.4
Bathrooms
Yes 146 97.3 77 98.7 69 95.8 0.53
No 4 2.7 1 1.3 3 4.2
Toilet drain
Rudimentary septic tank 128 85.4 68 87.2 60 83.3 0.04*
Septic tank 20 13.3 10 12.8 10 13.9
Sewerage system 2 1.3 0 0 2 2.8
Use of bathroom
Exclusive to the household 147 98.0 77 98.7 70 97.2 0.82
Common to other households 3 2.0 1 1.3 2 2.8
Waste management
Burned or buried 89 59.3 45 57.7 44 61.1 0.16*
Collected 61 40.7 33 42.3 28 38.9
Family income
Less than 1 minimum wage 29 19.3 23 29.5 6 8.3 0.04*
1 minimum wage 57 38.0 24 30.8 33 45.8
2 to 3 minimum wages 61 40.7 29 37.2 32 44.5
Between 3 and 5 minimum wages 1 0.7 1 1.3 0 0
Above 10 minimum wages 2 1.3 1 1.3 1 1.4
Access to health services
Yes 121 80.7 69 88.5 52 72.2 0.001*
No 29 19.3 9 11.5 20 27.8

n1=150; n2=78; n3=72 *p<0.20: significant result.

When comparing socioeconomic and demographic variables between positive and negative samples for parasitosis, using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when necessary, a value of p<0.20 can be observed for the variables skin color, age group, toilet drain, waste management, family income and access to health services. Subsequently, these variables were applied to the Poisson regression model, and a significant association with the parasitological results was obtained only for the variable access to the health services, with gross prevalence ratio (PR) of 2.9 (95% CI: 0.37-1.02) and prevalence ratio (PR) adjusted by the model of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.092.66, p<0.05), showing that individuals who do not have access to health services have an increase of 1.59 in the prevalence of parasitosis, when compared to those who have access to these services.

DISCUSSION

The study showed a high prevalence of intestinal parasites, as observed in other epidemiological studies conducted by Damazio et al. 30 and Mendes et al. 31, who identified, respectively, frequencies of 42.7% and 40.6% of intestinal parasites; both studies were also conducted in quilombola communities of Espírito Santo.

It is worth noting that intestinal parasites are a public health problem common to quilombola communities in several states and regions of Brazil, as can be observed in parasitological surveys conducted by Andrade et al. 14 and Amorim et al. 32, who identified, respectively, a prevalence of 63.8% parasitosis in quilombola communities in the state of Minas Gerais and 35.4% in communities in the state of Bahia.

The use of two parasitological techniques (Spontaneous Sedimentation and Kato-Katz) allows obtaining more accurate results, as described by Mendes et al. 33 and Carvalho et al. 34 who reported that the laboratory routine should use more than one parasitological method for detecting parasitic forms of protozoa and helminths, especially in samples with low parasite load 35,36, as observed in the present study.

Although not posing a health risk, the prevalence of commensal, non-pathogenic parasites, such as E. coli and E. nana, suggests poor hygiene and basic sanitation, since they indicate fecal-oral contamination, thus facilitating the transmission of other pathogenic parasites with a similar contamination pathway 9,37.

Unlike protozoa E. coli and E. nana, E. histolytica/dispar, present in 11.1% (n=8) of the positive samples, may pose a public health risk. E. histolytica and E. dispar are morphologically identical, but biochemically, physio-logically and genetically distinct, which makes E. dispar non pathogenic and E. histolytica, the etiological agent of intra-intestinal amoebiasis and, in the most severe cases, extra-intestinal invasion, with clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic infections to death. Species differentiation can be done through ELISA, indirect immunofluorescence, radioimmunoassay, among others, and the parasitological methods used in this study are insufficient to distinguish them 30,37,38.

In addition to protozoa, helminth species with a high degree of pathogenicity were identified in quilombola communities, such as Taenia sp., hookworms and A. lumbricoides, besides other species that manifest themselves with milder symptoms, such as E. vermicularis, H. nana and T. trichiura. However, not only does the severity of parasitic infections depend on virulence, but also on parasite load and host characteristics, such as age, nutritional status and immunological status 38,39.

The children, aged 0-10 years, were the most affected by intestinal parasites, which is in agreement with studies that relate the age of the children with being more prone to parasitic infections, once the immune response to parasites is still under development, personal hygiene care is being learned, many are dependent on parents and/or caregivers, in addition to a change in dietary patterns, with the introduction of raw foods in the diet, besides a greater contact with the soil, domestic animals and other children 40-42.

The high prevalence of intestinal parasites is often related to the precarious conditions of infrastructure and basic sanitation, favoring the transmission and maintenance of parasitosis in the populations. The high prevalence of A. lumbricoides, Ancylostomidae, E. histolytica/dispar, H. nana, T. trichiura, E. vermicularis, Taenia sp. parasites and the commensals E. coli and E. nana, indicating the need for effective interventions through educational actions, improved access to health services, implementation of parasite control programs, expansion and improvement of basic sanitation services offered to the community, in order to reduce the prevalence of intestinal parasites and to ensure better conditions and quality of life to the residents.

Considering that basic sanitation involves services of water supply, sewage and solid waste management, and that the population must be assisted in these three aspects to have a quality service, the results of this study indicate precarious conditions of basic sanitation, which makes the population vulnerable to diseases, posing a risk to public health 18,43.

The water supply comes mainly from wells or springs, without prior treatment or quality control, and may be unfit for human consumption, acting as a vehicle in the transmission of parasitic, bacterial and/or viral diseases. In addition, the burning and burial of the solid waste generated contributes negatively to population health, favoring air pollution, increasing the probability of respiratory problems, among others, besides the contamination of soil and groundwater, compromising the agricultural production of these populations. Some studies associate the poor conditions of basic sanitation and home infrastructure in quilombola communities to geographic isolation, making it difficult to increase services and improve the living conditions of this population 18,44.

However, in spite of the precarious socioeconomic condition, a statistically significant association between socioeconomic and demographic variables with the prevalence of parasitosis was not observed in this study, except for the variable access to the public health service, which presented an inversely proportional relation, acting as a protection factor, which may have occurred due to the number of participants in this study. Other studies with the same theme are suggested, covering a quilombola population that is representative of the state of Espírito Santo ♣

Acknowledgments:

To the students of Federal University of Espírito Santo Silvilene da Cunha Lázaro, Diego Ferrari Miranda and Igor Rocha Targino for their contribution in field works.

REFERENCES

1. Pedrosa MAF. Composição genética de quatro populações remanescentes de quilombos do Brasil com base em microssatélites e marcadores de ancestralidade [Internet]. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília; 2006 [cited 2018 Sep 30]. https://bit.ly/3q1Eyf3 . [ Links ]

2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Política Nacional de Saúde Integral da População Negra: uma política para o SUS [Internet]. Brasília: Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa, Departamento de Apoio à Gestão Participativa; 2013 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. https://bit.ly/39PGeSQ . [ Links ]

3. Guimarães CM. Quilombos e política (MG-XVIII). Rev de História. 1995;132:69-81. [ Links ]

4. Chagas MF. A política do reconhecimento dos remanescentes das comunidades dos quilombos. Horizontes Antropol. 2001;15:209-35. DOI:10.1590/S0104-71832001000100009. [ Links ]

5. Schmitt A, Turatti MCM, Carvalho MCP. A atualização do conceito de quilombo: identidade e território nas definições teóricas. Ambient. soc 2002; 10:1-10. DOI: 10.1590/S1414-753X2002000100008. [ Links ]

6. Leite IBB. O Projeto Político Quilombola: desafios, conquistas e impasses atuais. Rev Est Feministas. 2008; 16(3):65-977. DOI:10.1590/S0104-026X2008000300015. [ Links ]

7. Presidência da República. Identificação, reconhecimento, delimitação, demarcação e titulação das terras ocupadas por remanescentes das comunidades dos quilombos [Internet]. Brasília: Federal government of Brazil; 2003 [cited 2018 Aug 12]. https://bit.ly/36HYiwk . [ Links ]

8. Brasil. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. https://bit.ly/36JiGx7 . [ Links ]

9. Lima M. Desigualdades raciais e políticas públicas: ações afirmativas no governo Lula. Novos estudos - CEBRAP. 2010;87:77-95. DOI:10.1590/S0101-33002010000200005. [ Links ]

10. Federal Goverment of Brazil. Estatuto da Igualdade Racial [Internet]. Brazil: Federal Goverment of Brazil; 2010 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. https://bit.ly/2YRk2kZ . [ Links ]

11. Silva DO, Guerrero AF, Guerrero CH, Toledo LM. A rede de causalidade da insegurança alimentar e nutricional de comunidades quilombolas com a construção da rodovia BR-163, Pará, Brasil. Rev. Nutr. 2008; 21:83-97. DOI:10.1590/S1415-52732008000700008. [ Links ]

12. Ministério Público de Pernambuco. MPPE. No país do racismo institucional. Dez anos de ações do GT Racismo no MPPE [Internet]. Brasília: Federal government of Brazil ; 2013 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. https://bit.ly/3jirPBM . [ Links ]

13. Kochergin CN, Proietti FA, Cesar CC. Comunidades quilombolas de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil: autoavaliação de saúde e fatores associados. Cad. saúde pública. 2014; 30(7):1487-1501. DOI:10.1590/0102-311X00141213. [ Links ]

14. Andrade EC, Leite ICG, Vieira MT, Abramo C, Tibiriçá SHC, Silva PL. Prevalência de parasitoses intestinais em comunidade quilombola no Município de Bias Fortes, Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2008. Epidemiol. serv. Saúde. 2011; 20(3):337-44. DOI:10.5123/S1679-49742011000300008. [ Links ]

15. Freitas DA, Caballero AD, Marques AS, Hernande CIV, Antunes SLNO. Saúde e comunidades quilombolas: uma revisão da literatura. Rev CEFAC [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Jul 30]; 13(5):937-43. https://bit.ly/39LJy1x . [ Links ]

16. Telles VGA, Cardozo RO, Souza MAA. Estudo epidemiológico sobre enteroparasitoses no município de São Mateus, Espírito Santo, Brasil. Rev Scient Vitae [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jul 30]; 2(6):25-32. https://bit.ly/2Lk4XW5 . [ Links ]

17. Silva AMB, Bouth RC, Costa KS, Carvalho DC, Hirai KE, Prado RR, et al. Ocorrência de enteroparasitoses em comunidades ribeirinhas do Município de Igarapé Miri, Estado do Pará, Brasil. Rev Pan-Amazônica de Saúde [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jul 30]; 5(4):45-51. https://bit.ly/2YKodiz . [ Links ]

18. Silva EB, Alves CS, Portilho JCS. Diagnóstico Participativo de Saneamento Básico na comunidade rural do Baixo Rio Araguari, Município de Ferreira Gomes-Amapá, Brasil. Biota Amazônia. 2016; 6(2):17-23. DOI:10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v6n2p17-23. [ Links ]

19. Harpham T, Stephens C. Urbanization and health in developing countries. World Health Stat Q. 1991; 44(2):62-9. [ Links ]

20. Junior HC, Grossmann SMC, Murta NMG, Dias JVL, Pires HHR. Saúde em comunidade quilombola: caracterização ambiental e ocorrência de enteroparasitoses. Rev Univ Vale do Rio Verde. 2015; 13(2):603-12. DOI: 10.5892/ruvrd.v13i1.2509. [ Links ]

21. Gelaw A, Anagaw B, Nigussie B, Silesh B, Yirga A, Alem M, et al. Pre-valence of intestinal parasitic infections and risk factors among school-children at the University of Gondar Community School, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13(304):1-7. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-304. [ Links ]

22. Andrade EC, Leite IC, Rodrigues VO, Cesca MG. Intestinal parasitic diseases: a review of social, epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic aspects. Rev. APS. 2010; 13(2):231-40. [ Links ]

23. Belo VS, Oliveira RB, Fernandes PC, Nascimento BW, Fernandes FV, Castro CLF, et al. Fatores associados à ocorrência de parasitoses intestinais em uma população de crianças e adolescentes. Rev. paul. Pediatr. 2012; 30(2):195-201. DOI:10.1590/S0103-05822012000200007. [ Links ]

24. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE. Censo Demográfico 2010: resultados gerais da amostra [Internet]. Brasília; Federal Government of Brazil; 2011 [cited 2018 Aug 30]. https://bit.ly/39KQE6l . [ Links ]

25. Hoffman WA, Pons JA, Janer JL. The sedimentation concentration method in Schistosomiasis mansoni. J Public Health. 1934; 9:281-9. [ Links ]

26. Kato K. Acorrect application of the thick-smear technic with cellophane paper cover. A pamphlet. 1960; 1-9. [ Links ]

27. Katz N, Chaves A, Pellegrino J. A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in Schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo. 1972; 14:397-400. [ Links ]

28. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílio. Síntese de Indicadores; 2015 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. https://bit.ly/39OK7Yw . [ Links ]

29. World Health Organization. The control of schistosomiasis. Second report of the WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1993;830:1-86. [ Links ]

30. Damazio SM, Lima MS, Soares AR, Souza MAA. Intestinal parasites in a quilombola Community of the Northern State of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo . 2013; 55(3):1-6. [ Links ]

31. Mendes AN, Silva ACC, Koppe EC, Filgueiras LA. Incidência de ascaridíase em comunidade quilombola de Cachoeiro de Itapemirim, Espírito Santo, Brasil. Bol Inf Geum [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Jul 30]; 7(1):28-33. https://bit.ly/3oSIPQi . [ Links ]

32. Amorim MM, Tomazi L, Silva RAA, Gestinari RS, Figueiredo TB. Avaliação das condições habitacionais e de saúde da comunidade quilombola Boqueirão, Bahia, Brasil. Biosci. J [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Jul 30]; 29(4):1049-57. https://bit.ly/2MVbNBQ . [ Links ]

33. Carvalho GLX, Moreira LE, Pena JL, Marinho CC, Bahia MT, Macha-do-Coelho GLL. A comparative study of the TF-Test®, Kato-Katz, Hoff-man-Pons-Janer, Willis and Baermann-Moraes coprologic methods for the detection of human parasitosis. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2012; 107:80-4. DOI:10.1590/S0074-02762012000100011. [ Links ]

34. Mendes CR, Teixeira ATLS, Pereira RAT, Dias LCS. Estudo comparativo de técnicas parasitológicas: Kato-Katz e coprotest®. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2005; 38:178-80. DOI: 10.1590/S0037-86822005000200010. [ Links ]

35. Enk MJ, Lima AC, Drummond SC, Schall VT, Coelho PM. The effect of the number of stool samples on the observed prevalence and the infection intensity with Schistosoma mansoni among a population in an area of low transmission. Acta trop. 2008; 108:222-8. DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.09.016. [ Links ]

36. Siqueira LMV, Coelho PMZ, Oliveira AA, Massara CL, Carneiro NFF, Lima ACL, et al. Evaluation of two coproscopic techniques for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis in a low-transmission area in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz . 106:2011; 844-50. DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02762011000700010. [ Links ]

37. Silva MTN, Santana JV, Bragagnoli G, Marinho AMN, Malagueno E. Prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar in the city of Campina Grande, in northeastern Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo . 2014; 56(5):451-4. DOI:10.1590/s0036-46652014000500015. [ Links ]

38. Neves DP, Melo AL, Linardi PM. Parasitologia Humana. 12th ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2011. [ Links ]

39. Belloto MVT, Junior JES, Macedo EA, Ponce A, Galisteu KJ, Castro E, et al. Enteroparasitoses numa população de escolares da rede pública de ensino do Município de Mirassol, São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Pan-Amazônica de Saúde . 2011; 2(1):37-44. DOI: 10.5123/S2176-62232011000100004. [ Links ]

40. Zaiden MF, Santos BM, Cano MA, Junior AN. Epidemiologia das parasitoses intestinais em crianças de creches de Rio Verde, GO. Med. (Ribeirão Preto). 2008;41(2):182-7. DOI: 10.5123/S2176-62232010000400004. [ Links ]

41. Pereira C, Silva MC. Fatores de risco das enteroparasitoses de escolares públicos da Bahia. Rev Saúde.Com [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jul 30]; 10(3):245-53. https://bit.ly/3pPb2Jj . [ Links ]

42. Fentie T, Erqou S, Gedefaw M, Desta A. Epidemiology of human fascioliasis and intestinal parasitosis among schoolchildren in Lake Tana Basin, northwest Ethiopia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013; 107(8):480-6. DOI:10.1093/trstmh/trt056. [ Links ]

43. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira [Internet]. Brasília: Government of Brasília; 2015 [cited 2018 Jul 30]. https://bit.ly/3jfLpPi . [ Links ]

44. Rosseto R, Sambuichi RHR. Resíduos Agrosilvopastoris II: resíduos inorgânicos e resíduos domésticos da área rural; 2011 [cited 2018 Aug 23]. https://bit.ly/3oXOeWB . [ Links ]

Conflict of interest: None.

Received: November 12, 2018; Revised: September 18, 2019; Accepted: October 13, 2019

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License