EDITORIAL

What is a native? and what is normal? A necessary distinction for to understand!
http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/just.21.29.1227

The historical development of the humanity has been an accomplice of infinite social recognized, valued, accepted and even sanctified vicissitudes. In the same way, in the terms of Durkheim's social facts, innumerable configurations have existed and desconfiguraciones social, repudiated, dismissed, exiled, because they are in the habit of being scandalous, chilling before the divine thing and the morally correct thing. This prosecution of what it are nice or badly, of the correct and incorrect thing, of the acceptable and unacceptable thing, is in surface the scheme of legitimacy of what is understood for naturally and normally.

However, the problem is not realizing what is meant by natural and normal, the problem is that behind what is deemed as normal nature of being denied. This should obviously take us in terms of philosophy and philosophy of law to reflect on the institutions created by men and women of the <Milky Way> on behalf of nature and normal.

By way of intimidating a little, the faithful be in the claim of a woman and vice versa man or a same-sex couple is something that is not natural. In this sense, infidelity is natural, as is equally homosexuality and heterosexuality. The problem is that the latter denied the former with the label that homosexuality is unnatural, that it is a disease, is something abnormal. A deviation or social anomie.

On the other hand from a Hobbesian perspective, man is not just evil by nature, it is profane, hostile, envious, with some exceptions as in the case of Siddhartha Gautama Buddha, Jesus Christ, Immanuel Kant, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, among others, really they are few and different from the rest of human nature, which has been from a viewpoint of regularities and witness imperfect, worldly, Dionysian, masochistic and sadistic condition of being frequencies.

On the religious level, so it does the sources of good and evil. The nature and divinity have merged, and thus raising within the Judeo-Christian tradition is a guarantee of the natural and normal being, be generous, well lurch, the Good Samaritan, the right man moral and ethically, which it is not logical from the transcendental idea of free will, in which lies the free will of men and women, and which you can live emancipated from dogmas, and owning, lord and master of rational decisions purposive from the same grace of reason and justified likely source of the natural and normal with, as is the discussion of human rights.

In this sense, marriage is an institution created by men and seen socially as natural and normal, which clearly merits a brief distinction, where the nuptials as already noted, it is normal, but not natural, infidelity is essentially natural, but loyalty in terms of a relationship should be normal. This is also preaches that the nature of being is pure animality, reflective wildness, negative freedom is meat, which is controllable only by the limits of reason or self-ethics; and meanwhile, normal is a social construction that is validated by consensus legitimizing the good and the bad, according to the arkhe emanating from the Judeo-Christian tradition that is an absolute denial, even relative or ponderativa of the profane.

Finally, on behalf of nature and normal, atrocities, perversions, to which Norbert Elias call <second nature>, where society is ill-considered and recognized as such (natural and normal), the above examples raised, and other legitimated which in the course of social practice, so even though all agree in the silence of reason as incorrect, are accepted by a majority complicity of pseudo-citizens, as is verbigracia domestic violence, machismo, child abuse, corruption and multiplex metamorphosis as clientelism, electoral favors, being in pineapple, on the play, have the political leverage, the rewards, among other misfortunes seen as normal and worse as natural with no reason.