Editorial

Where do we go in terms of safety and quality of obstetric care in Colombia?

Hacia dónde vamos en seguridad y calidad de la atención obstétrica en Colombia?

Edgar Iván Ortiz^1,2,3, Jack Ludmir⁴

¹ Profesor Titular. Departamento Obstetricia y Ginecología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
² Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (Fecolsog). Bogota, Colombia.
³ Federación Latinoamericana de Asociaciones y Sociedades de Obstetricia y Ginecología (FLASOG). Panama, Panama.
⁴ Professor and Head, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology. Pennsylvania Hospital. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Ortíz EI, Ludmir J. Where do we go in safety and quality of obstetric care in Colombia?. Colomb Med (Cali). 2015; 47(1): 9-10.

© 2016 Universidad del Valle. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article history:
Received: 15 September 2015 - Received: 11 March 2016 - Accepted: 11 March 2016.

Corresponding author:

Edgar Iván Ortiz: Profesor Titular. Departamento Obstetricia y Ginecología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. Presidente FECOLSOG, FLASOG.
E-mail: edgar.ortiz@correounivalle.edu.co.

---

Despite the great achievements in indicators of access to prenatal care and delivery care with qualified staff in Latin America, the fifth goal agreed at the Millennium Development Goals (MDG 5) of reducing maternal mortality in 75% by 2015 did not come true^1-2. In part, this can be explained by gains in coverage that do not result in safe and high quality obstetric care.

Extreme Maternal Morbidity (EMM), defined as a serious complication that occurs during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum, and which threatens the life of a woman, is an anticipatory event of death. Its monitoring enables identification of actions that prevent maternal death, and therefore it is recognized as a quality tracer; Colombia, with the establishment of monitoring extreme maternal morbidity (EMM) at national level, have the opportunity to become a model country in how to improve obstetric care^3,4.

This implies improving the skills of human resources in the analysis of cases, properly interpreting the indicators generated from their surveillance, and developing and implementing improvement plans in line with the needs of the institutions involved in obstetric care, making emphasis on quality and safety of care⁵.

The aggregate analysis of EMM cases held in the period 20072012 in Colombia revealed the presence of delays in obstetric care either by the lack of recognition of alarm symptoms by the patient, or the lack of adequate medical care. This information allows a country to focus on areas where care could be improved, including education of pregnant women, their families and communities; and implementation of protocols for safe obstetric care, prioritizing the most common causes of EMM, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, postpartum bleeding and sepsis⁶.

What is the value of reporting EMM cases to the national health responsible if the reporting institution is not aware of their own indicators and does not use the information to establish specific programs to improve health care?

EMM surveillance cannot be limited only to its characterization at the level of a country, because the true potential of the event would be underestimated. It is required an ongoing analysis of cases, to develop care programs to improve quality and safety in obstetrical care, and to build indicators to monitor and evaluate the impact of improvement plans at institutional level.

The EMM analysis and the implementation of improvement programs in care entails a reduction of maternal mortality, as it was demonstrated with compelling evidence in the significant reduction of maternal deaths in the Hospital Universitario del Valle, in Cali, Colombia, from 2005 to 2010, by monitoring and analysis of EMM, and the implementation of improvement plans⁷.

Safe and high quality obstetric care requires commitment and leadership from both government authorities and the institutions providing obstetric care, in order to achieve a reduction of maternal deaths, a goal that is consistent with the new objectives of sustainable development⁸.

For a country, it is mandatory to understand that EMM surveillance is not a bureaucratic requirement, which requires the implementation of real and feasible programs intended to improve the quality and safety of obstetric care.

We think that it is necessary a new model of obstetric care, based on the centrality of the pregnant woman and her family, and not in the traditional (pyramidal) model. Women care must be comprehensive, multidisciplinary and humanized. In this new (circular) model, the woman and her family are the backbone. This model is based on four pillars: safety and quality of care, user satisfaction, commitment of all hospital staff and health personnel, and economic sustainability of the institution, which allows a constant reinvestment in care improvement⁹.

Our hope is that this new focus on the expectant mother and her family will allow us, as a country and continent, to achieve the new goals of sustainable development, in order to ensure physical and emotional well-being of women and children that ensure they reach their full potential.

---

References

1. PAHO, CLAP/WR. Basic Indicators 2013. 2014. Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=27299&Itemid=721&lang=en.         [ Links ]

2. Instituto Nacional de Salud.Dirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública Comportamiento de los eventos de vigilancia en salud públicaEnfermedades no Transmisibles. Morbilidad materna extrema. Boletín Epidemiológico. 2015; Semana Epidemiológica(52): 62.         [ Links ]

3. Ortiz EI, Quintero CA, Mejia J, Romero E, Ospino L. Vigilancia de la morbilidad materna extrema. Ministerio de la Protección Social de Colombia. Dirección General de Salud Pública y Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas (UNFPA). 2010. 67 pp.         [ Links ]

4. Firoz T, Chou D, von Dadelzsen P, Say L, Agrawal P, Vanderkruik R. Measuring maternal healthfocus on maternal morbidity. Bull WHO. 2013;91(10):794-6.         [ Links ]

5. Guerrero GJE, Ortiz LEI, Sarria GOD. Modelo de seguridad para la atención de la emergencia obstétrica en instituciones de salud. Ministerio de Salud y Proteccion Social de Colombia y Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas (UNFPA). 2014. 133 pp.         [ Links ]

6. Acuña JM, Ortiz EI, Carvajal J. Morbilidad Materna Extrema. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia y Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas (UNFPA). 2014. 51 pp.         [ Links ]

7. Ortiz EI. La vigilancia de la morbilidad materna extrema. No publicado. 2011.         [ Links ]

8. ONU. Transformar nuestro mundo. 2015. Available from: http://www.un.org/es/comun/docs/?symbol=A/70/PV.4.         [ Links ]

9. Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011; 9(2): 100-3.         [ Links ]