SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 issue1Cancer represents a challenge of increasing scale in the region: Do we have high-quality information to confront it?Cancer incidence and mortality in Uruguay: 2013-2017 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Colombia Médica

On-line version ISSN 1657-9534

Colomb. Med. vol.53 no.1 Cali Jan./Mar. 2022  Epub Jan 25, 2022

https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v53i1.5050 

Original article

Cancer epidemiology in Cali, 60 years of experience

Luis Eduardo Bravo1  2  3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-0312

Luz Stella García1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8108-1855

Paola Collazos1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-2087

Edwin Carrascal1  2  3 

Elvia Karina Grillo Ardila1  4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-5153

Erquinovaldo Millan5 

Jorge Holguín5  6 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-6672

1Universidad del Valle, Registro Poblacional de Cáncer. Cali, Colombia.

2Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Salud, Escuela de Medicina. Departamento de Patología, Cali, Colombia.

3 Hospital Universitario del Valle “Evaristo García” E.S.E., Cali, Colombia.

4 Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Salud, Doctorado en Salud, Cali, Colombia.

5Secretaria de Salud Pública de Cali, Cali, Colombia.

6Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Salud, Escuela de Medicina, Departamento de Otolaringología Cali, Colombia.


Abstract

Background:

The population-based Cancer Registry of Cali Colombia operates continuously since 1962, disseminating incidence information in the XI volumes of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents.

Aim:

To describe the incidence and mortality rates for the period 2011-2020 and the changes in the trend of incidence rates (1962-2017) and mortality rates from cancer (1986-2020).

Methods:

The Joinpoint model and the annual percentage change (APC) were used as summary measures of the changes in the trends of incidence rates (ASR-I) and mortality (ASR-M) standardized by age with the direct method.

Results:

Trough 1988-2017 the ASR-I for all locations increased 0.4% annually (95% CI: 0.2, 0.6) in men and decreased annually 0.2% (95% CI: -0.3; -0.1) in women. The ASR-Is of cancers related to opportunity screening activities (prostate and breast) increased until the early 21st century and then decreased. The ASR-I of cancers related to infectious agents continue to decrease (cervix, vulva, and stomach). There is evidence of control of cancer related to tobacco consumption (lung, oral cavity, bladder). In both sexes, the ASR-I of thyroid, colorectal and lymphoma cancers increased and those of ovarian cancer decreased. Between 1984-2020 the ASR-M for all locations decreased annually 0.7% (95% CI: -0.9, -0.5) in men and 1.1% (95% CI: -1.3, -0.9) in women. For both sexes, ASR-M decreased for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, lung, bladder, lymphomas, and leukemias; and increased in colorectal cancer. The ASR-M for cervical and prostate cancer decreased annually by 3.5% (95% CI: -3.9, -3.2) and 0.1% (95% CI: -0.5, -0.3), respectively.

Comment:

This information allows the construction of some indicators to monitor the City Cancer Challenge initiative and the current 10-year plan for cancer control in Colombia, 2011-2021.

Key words: Cali; Cancer; Colombia; trends; neoplasms; epidemiology; adult; age distribution; aged; 80 and over; child; female; humans; incidence; infant; male; middle aged; morbidity; mortality; pathology; registries; survival rate; young adult

Resumen

Antecedentes:

El registro poblacional de Cáncer de Cali-Colombia, opera desde 1962 divulgando continuamente la información de incidencia en los XI volúmenes de Cancer Incidence in Five Continents.

Objetivo:

Describir las tasas de incidencia y mortalidad del periodo 2011-2020 y los cambios en la tendencia de las tasas de incidencia (1962-2017) y mortalidad por cáncer (1986-2020).

Métodos:

Se utilizó el modelo de Joinpoint y el cambio porcentual anual (APC) como medidas de resumen de los cambios en las tendencias de las tasas de incidencia (ASR-I) y mortalidad (ASR-M) estandarizadas por edad con el método directo.

Resultados:

Durante el periodo 1988-2017 las ASR-I para todas las localizaciones aumentaron anualmente 0.4% (IC 95%: 0.2; 0.6) en los hombres y disminuyeron anualmente 0.2% (IC 95%: -0.3; -0.1) en las mujeres. Las ASR-I de los cánceres relacionados con actividades de tamización de oportunidad (próstata y mama) aumentaron hasta principios del siglo XXI y luego descendieron. Las ASR-I de los canceres relacionados con agentes infecciosos continúan disminuyendo (cérvix, vulva y estómago). Hay evidencias de control de los cánceres relacionados al consumo de tabaco (pulmón, cavidad oral, vejiga). En ambos sexos aumentaron las ASR-I de los cánceres de tiroides, colorrectal y linfomas y disminuyeron las de cáncer de ovario. Entre 1984-2020 las ASR-M para todas las localizaciones disminuyeron anualmente 0.7% (IC 95%: -0.9; -0.5) en los hombres y 1.1% (IC 95%: -1.3; -0.9) en las mujeres. Para ambos sexos, disminuyeron las ASR-M para los cánceres de esófago, estómago, pulmón, vejiga, linfomas y leucemias; y aumentaron en cáncer colorrectal. Las ASR-M por cáncer de cérvix y próstata disminuyeron anualmente 3.5% (IC 95%: -3.9; -3.2) y 0.1% (IC 95%: -0.5; -0.3), respectivamente.

Comentario:

Esta información permite construir algunos indicadores para monitorear la iniciativa City Cancer Challenge y el actual Plan Decenal para el Control del Cáncer en Colombia, 2011-2021.

Palabras clave: Cali; Colombia; cáncer; tendencias de cáncer; epidemiología; adulto; anciano; niños; mujer; humano; incidencia; hombre; morbilidad; mortalidad; neoplasmas; patología; registros; tasa de sobrevivencia; adulto joven

Remark

1) Why was this study conducted?
In order to update the information on incidence (2013-2017), mortality (2011-2020); and describe the changes in the trend of cancer incidence and mortality rates in Cali, Colombia from 1962 to 2017; and 1984 to 2020, respectively.
2) What were the most relevant results of the study?
The incidence rates of cancers related to screening activities (prostate and breast) increased until the beginning of the 21st century; then declined in the second decade. With the implementation of aspiration cytology and the development of new diagnostic imaging methods, there was an increase in thyroid cancer diagnoses. In contrast, the incidence and mortality rates of cancers related to infectious agents continue to decrease (cervix and stomach), with an acceleration of the trend in the last five years. There is evidence of control of cancers related to tobacco consumption (lung, oral cavity, bladder).
3) What do these results contribute?
Some indicators that will serve to evaluate the City Cancer Challenge initiative; and evidence of progress in the control of incidence and mortality for some types of cancer prioritized by the Ten-Year Plan for the Control of Colombian cancer.

Introduction

Chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) cause 71% of all deaths annually in the world. One in five of these deaths is attributed to cancer 1,2, an increasing global public health problem, caused by a group of long-term diseases that are the first or second cause of premature death in people aged 30 to 69 years in 134 countries of the world 3. By 2040, it is estimated the appearance of 30.2 million new cases of cancer in the world; two thirds will occur in low- and middle-income countries, where cure rates are lower; and 20% of cancer diagnoses will occur in people under 75 years of age 4.

"The distribution of cancer types varies between countries; and age-standardized rates are expressed in cases per 100,000 person-years of incidence (ASR-I) and mortality (ASR-M). These rates are the measures of occurrence used to describe each type of cancer." In 2020, the ASR-I for the five most frequent locations of cancer in the world were breast (47.8), prostate (30.7), lung (22.4), colorectal (19.5) and cervix (13.3) Lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer death (ASR-M = 14.1) 5.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), between 30 and 50% of cancers are preventable. To reduce the burden of the disease, it is necessary to reduce known risk factors and implement prevention strategies aimed at early diagnosis, timely treatment, and adequate patient care 6. These strategies coincide with the third of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which aims to reduce by 2030 one third of premature deaths caused by NCDs 7.

The economic impact of cancer on the population and health systems is significant; however, there is evidence that investments in health are cost-effective. It is estimated that in order to save 7.3 million lives by 2030, a minimum investment of per capita spending is required, which can range from US $2.7 in high-income countries to US $3.95 and US $8.15 in high-to-medium income countries, and low-to-middle income countries, respectively 4. If between 2020 and 2030 there is an additional 6.9% increase in treatment costs for the comprehensive expansion of treatments, imaging tests and quality of cancer care, 12.5% ​​of deaths in the world would be avoided, with US $2.9 billion in lifetime economic benefits, and a return on every dollar invested of US $12.43 8.

One in five low-to-middle income countries has the information necessary to promote policies against the disease 9. The Colombian government has organized the national cancer information system; it also determines the roles and responsibilities of the health system components, indicating the sources and integration of information, as well as the mechanisms for its improvement 10. There are six regional population-based cancer registries, which are part of the national cancer information system, and their purpose is to record incident cases in defined geographic areas: Cali, Pasto, Manizales, Bucaramanga, Barranquilla, and Medellín 11. The information they provide is used to measure and monitor the impact of cancer in the community; they represent the gold standard for providing cancer incidence and survival figures in each region, and they are a key element for cancer control because they provide indicators for planning and evaluating cancer control activities, as well as to conduct research 12.

The Cali Population Cancer Registry (RPCC, for its initials in Spanish) has operated continuously since 1962, monitoring the impact of cancer in the city 11,13,14. The RPCC is an accredited member of the International Association of Cancer Registries (IACR) and meets the international quality standards recommended by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 15. This study presents age-standardized rates in incidence (2013 to 2017), and mortality from cancer (2011 to 2020); it also describes the changes in temporal trends in cancer incidence and mortality rates from 1962 to 2017, and 1984 to 2020, respectively.

Materials and Methods

Registry population and area

Cali, capital of the Valle del Cauca Province, is the third city in Colombia; its demographic structure, which is presented in Figure 1 according to the 1964 and 2018 censuses, shows changes in the shape of the population pyramid, with a reduction of the base and broadening of the cusp; the population has quadrupled, reaching 2.2 million inhabitants in 2018, from which 53.6% are women 16. There are 48 older adults (aged 65 years and over) for every 100 children and youth (aged under 15 years) 16,17. The population of 1964 was considerably younger than that of 2018. These data show a remarkable transformation of the population of Cali in the last 60 years. The coverage area of ​​the cancer registry is the municipality of Cali, with a density of 40.42 inhabitants/hectare 18.

Figure 1 Silhouette of the population pyramids of Cali, 1964 and 2018. The 1964 population pyramid is expansive, with a broad base and a narrow top. The population pyramid in 2018 is regressive, with less population at the base than in the intermediate sections. For every 100 people aged under 15, there are 48 people aged over 65. 

The Colombian health system

Colombia, a middle-to-high income country, has a General System of Social Security in Health based on a solidarity insurance model, founded on the principles of structured pluralism and regulated competition between public and private sectors. This compulsory and universal health insurance system seeks to cover the entire population, regardless of their socioeconomic status 19,20. Its financing is mixed, with contributions from workers, employers and the national government. Although health coverage reaches 99% of the population, the system is not yet efficient, and multiple supply and access barriers continue to exist 21.

The cancer care model was defined in the Decennial Cancer Control Plan in Colombia 2012-2021, which prioritizes cervical, breast, prostate, colorectal, stomach and childhood cancers 22. In Cali, the network for cancer care has 165 authorized oncology services, located in the urban area, where 95% of the population resides. Care is fractional, and only five hospitals have integrated cancer services; only one of them is a state hospital 23.

Cancer notification systems

Since 2014, the Ministry of Health has established a regulatory framework for the mandatory notification of cancer cases through the Epidemiology Surveillance System (SIVIGILA) 24 and the High-Cost Account (CAC) 25. Priority was given to all cases of childhood cancer and 11 adult cancers, seven solid tumors (breast, prostate, cervix, stomach, colon and rectum, lung, and melanoma) and four hematological neoplasms (both myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemias; as well as Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas). However, identity and tumor information are included for all people diagnosed with cancer located at any anatomical site, regardless of age or health insurance status 26.

The implementation of the notification systems facilitated the activities of the cancer registry during the 2013-2020 period, because most of the sources reported simultaneously to both the notification system of the ministry of health and the cancer registry.

Removal of cancer cases

The Cali cancer registry is population-based. New cases of cancer in permanent residents of the city are obtained on an ongoing basis through active search and reporting. Collection is continuous in diagnostic laboratories (pathology, cytology, flow cytometry), hospitals and clinics; both public and private; and in the Municipal Public Health Secretariat (death certificates and cancer notification systems). The procedures for updating the information and including new cases in the database have been previously described 27.

Case definition

Men and women of any age, residents in the urban area of ​​Cali, with a diagnosis of invasive malignant tumor for the first time (incident), of any anatomical location, independent that has been confirmed or partially or totally treated. The basis for the diagnosis can be both microscopic (fluid cytology, peripheral blood and bone marrow, histology of primary tumors and autopsy); as well as non-microscopic (clinical, surgical and imaging diagnosis). They include single or multiple primary malignant tumors, all tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), and cancer in situ of the breast and cervix. There are excluded benign tumors with uncertain behavior, malignancies of metastatic site, and basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (they were included until 1986). Those cases that have come to the city for treatment or diagnosis purposes are not considered residents of Cali 27.

Comparability

Malignant tumors were coded with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 28. During the long registration period, 1962-2020, three versions have been used (ICD-8, ICD-9 and ICD-10); in 1998, the IARCTools program was used to convert the codes between the CIE versions 29. The main locations were defined according to the guidelines suggested by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) for the analysis of incidence information; and by WHO to group the primary tumor site and the underlying cause of death 5,15,27. The date of incidence corresponds to the date of the first histological or cytological confirmation of the cancer. To classify multiple primary tumors, the guidelines of the European Network of Cancer Registries (ENCR) and the IARC/IACR 30,31. Details regarding the history, objectives, logistics and coverage; as well as procedures and methods for estimating incidence, mortality, and survival in adults have been previously described 15,27.

Incidence and mortality analysis

Cases: Information on new cancer cases was obtained from the RPCC database, and information on general mortality is periodically obtained from individual death certificates notified to the Municipal Public Health Secretariat of Cali.

Population at risk. The population structure for Cali by sex and five-year age groups for each calendar year was obtained from official census data provided by the National Administrative Department of Statistics of Colombia (DANE) 16,18. 18 age groups were taken into account, using the categories 0-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19… 80-84, 85+).

Estimate of rates. Incidence and mortality rates are expressed as annual average rates for a five-year observation period; the denominator (total population or specific stratum) becomes an estimate of person-years of observation. Individuals of the opposite sex were excluded from the denominator of sex-specific cancer rates.

Crude rates, standardized rates, and age-specific rates are expressed per 100,000 person-years. Standardization by age was done with the direct method using the world standard population proposed by Segi (ASR-W, for its English acronym, Age-Standardized Rate) 27,32. To describe the incidence and mortality information, the acronyms ASR-W (I) and ASR-W (M) will be used, respectively.

The crude rate (RC), for all ages, was calculated by dividing the total number of cases of each type of cancer by the number of person-years of observation. The age-specific rate for each group was calculated by dividing the number of cases in the age group by the corresponding person-years of observation. To obtain the ASR-W, the age-specific rates (ai) were multiplied by the weights of the standard population (pi) resulting in the product aipi, whose sum was divided by 100,000.

Rate trend analysis

The trend in cancer incidence and mortality rates was analyzed for eleven five-year periods (1962-2017) and seven five-year periods (1984-2020), respectively. The trend of the rates was examined using the annual percentage change in the rates (APC) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). It was used the weighted least squares method, implemented by default in the SEER * Stat program 33. In order to identify the moment in which significant changes in the trend occurred, and to estimate the trend observed in said interval, the JoinPoint regression model was used 34. The (APC) represents the average annual percentage increase or decrease in cancer rates during a specific time period. In describing the change, the terms "increase" or "decrease" were used when the APC was significantly different from zero (two-sided p-values ​​<0.05); otherwise, the term "stable or flat" was used.

Quality indicators

Incidence information. Internal consistency was evaluated using the IarcTool program 12,29; validity, by using diagnostic criteria methods (percentage of cases identified only by death certificates, proportion of morphologically verified cases and categorized by sex and place). Completeness was evaluated by analyzing the mortality: incidence ratio (M: I), and the missing information analyses describe the percentage of poorly defined sites, unknown age, and unknown diagnosis base.

Mortality information. The quality of the certification of mortality was evaluated using the following proportions (%): deaths from cancer of the uterus of unspecified site (C55); deaths from cancer of an unestablished primary, of poorly specified sites, or as a consequence of a metastatic tumor without an unestablished primary (C76-C80, C97); cancer deaths without age information; cancer deaths that were not certified by a physician; and well-certified cancer deaths 35.

Ethical considerations

The RPCC follows the guidelines of the European Network of Cancer Registries (ENCR) 30. The director of the RPCC is responsible for information security. All members of the RPCC sign an agreement to ensure the protection of the confidentiality of data about people whose cancer is reported to the RPCC. Access to the physical space of the Registry is restricted to authorized persons. Information considered confidential is controlled by access codes to computers, closed files and destruction of material with identification when it is no longer useful. A single person (administrator) makes the initial matches between databases to detect new cases and update vital status and last contact information. Each case is assigned a registration number, and the information that identifies a patient is removed when the data (name and identity document) are analyzed.

Results

New cases of cancer (2013-2017)

Table 1 shows the cancer incidence rates per 100,000 person-years by sex and location for the five-year period 2013-2017. During this period, 24,963 new cases of cancer were diagnosed in permanent residents of Cali, for an annual average of 4,993 cases; 55% (13,772) occurred in women; the female/male ratio was 1.2. The age-standardized incidence rates for all locations in men were 191.2; and 175.4 in women. The proportion of cancer cases with morphological verification was 88.8%; and 1.5% had the death certificate as the only evidence of cancer diagnosis.

The five main sites of primary cancer in men were prostate (ASR: 53.8), stomach (ASR: 18.0), colon and rectum (ASR: 17.3), lymphomas (ASR: 13.3), and lung (ASR: 13.1), being 60.4% of all new cases during the period. In women, the most frequent locations were breast (ASR: 45.9), thyroid (ASR: 17.4), colon and rectum (ASR: 14.3), cervix (ASR: 13.0), and stomach (ASR: 9.8), corresponding to 56.8% of all new cases diagnosed in the period.

Table 1 Cali, Colombia. Incidence rates standardized by age (World Population) per 100,000 person-year and the annual percentage change (APC) by sex during the period 2013-2017 

Male Female Male Female Code
Site n ASR n ASR APC 95% CI APC 95% CI ICD 10
Oral cavity and pharynx 313 5.3 241 3.1 -1.0* (-1.3 ; -0.6) -1.0* (-1.5 ; -0.6) C00-14
Esophagus 117 2.0 57 0.6 -1.5* (-2.1 ; -0.8) ~ C15
Stomach 1,074 18.0 823 9.8 -1.9* (-2.1 ; -1.8) -1.9* (-2.2 ; -1.7) C16
Small intestine 44 0.7 56 0.7 ~ ~ C17
Colon and Rectum 1,025 17.3 1,168 14.3 2.2* (1.9 ; 2.5) 1.6* (1.3 ; 1.9) C18-20
Anus 37 0.6 96 1.2 ~ ~ C21
Liver 272 4.7 282 3.3 1.8* (1.2 ; 2.4) 0.6 (-0.1 ; 1.3) C22
Gallbladder 119 2.0 244 2.9 -1.3* (-1.9 ; -0.8) -2.1* (-2.6 ; -1.6) C23-24
Pancreas 271 4.6 318 3.7 ~ 0.0 (-0.4 ; 0.3) C25
Nasal cavity and middle ear, paranasal sinus 33 0.6 37 0.4 ~ ~ C30-31
Larynx 149 2.6 28 0.3 -1.5* (-2.0 ; -1.0) ~ C32
Bronchi and lung 768 13.1 599 6.9 -1.0* (-1.5 ; -0.6) 0.0 (-0.5 ; 0.5) C34
Bone 97 1.6 97 1.4 1.0* (0.3 ; 1.6) 0.5 (-0.3 ; 1.3) C40-41
Connective tissue 143 2.3 143 1.9 ~ 0.2 (-0.3 ; 0.7) C47-49
Mesothelioma 14 0.2 6 0.1 ~ ~ C45
Kaposi Sarcoma 60 1.0 11 0.1 ~ ~ C46
Skin melanoma 137 2.3 174 2.2 ~ 0.4 (-0.2 ; 1.0) C43
Other skin 54 0.9 68 0.9 ~ ~ C44
Breast 58 1.0 3,546 45.9 ~ 1.1* (0.9 ; 1.4) C50
Vulva 47 0.5 -1.9* (-2.6 ; -1.2) C51
Vagina     34 0.4   ~ C52
Uterus unspecified 62 0.8 ~ C55
Uterine cervix     992 13.0   -3.1* (-3.3 ; -2.9) C53
Corpus uteri 400 5.1 0.2 (-0.2 ; 0.5) C54
Ovary     472 6.1   -0.5* (-0.8 ; -0.1) C56
Other females genital organs 32 0.4 ~ C57-58
Penis 60 1.0     ~   C60
Prostate 3,083 53.8 2.1* (1.5 ; 2.7) C61
Testicle 160 2.5     1.6* (1.0 ; 2.2)   C62
Other male genital organs 7 0.1 ~ C63
Kidney, renal pelvis, urethra 298 5.1 242 3.3 2.6* (2.0 ; 3.1) 2.0* (1.5 ; 2.5) C64-66
Bladder 301 5.1 118 1.3 -0.9* (-1.3 ; -0.5) -1.4* (-1.9 ; -0.8) C67
Other urinary organs 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~ ~ C68
Eye 78 1.3 73 1.1 ~ ~ C69
Central Nervous System 295 5.1 268 3.7 1.0* (0.5 ; 1.4) 1.5* (1.0 ; 2.0) C70-72
Thyroid 234 3.8 1,293 17.4 1.9* (1.1 ; 2.7) 2.9* (2.6 ; 3.3) C73
Other endocrine 12 0.2 6.0 0.1 ~ ~   C74-75
Hodgkin's disease 101 1.7 69 1.0 -1.4* (-1.9 ; -0.8) -0.7* (-1.4 ; -0.1) C81
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 502 8.5 467 6.0 1.5* (1.0 ; 2.0) 1.3* (0.8 ; 1.9) C82-85, 96
Multiple myeloma 187 3.1 173 2.1 ~ ~ C90
Lymphocytic leukemia 245 4.7 177 2.6 1.9* (1.4 ; 2.4) ~ C91
Myeloid and monocytic leukemia 191 3.1 155 2.1 -0.2 (-0.8 ; 0.3) 0.7* (0.1 ; 1.2) C92-94
Non-specific leukemia 48 0.8 43 0.5 ~ ~ C95
Poorly defined sites 483 8.2 528 6.4 -0.5* (-0.9 ; -0.2) -1.2* (-1.6 ; -0.8) **
All the sites 11,191 191.2 13,772 175.4 0.4* (0.2 ; 0.6) -0.2* (-0.3 ; -0.1) C00-96
All the sites ¶ 11,137 190.3 13,704 174.5 0.4* (0.2 ; 0.6) -0.2* (-0.3 ; 0.0) C00-43, 45-96

Number of cases (n); Standardized incidence rate by age (ASR, by its acronym in English)

APC: For its acronym in English Annual Percent Change. APC is calculated for period 1962-2017

*The APC is significantly different from zero (p <0.05)

**C26, C39, C48, C76, C80 - ICD: 998_/3

~ APC could not be calculated

¶ All sites excluding non-melanoma skin cancer

Figure 2 shows the age-specific incidence and mortality rates for all locations according to sex during the 2013-2017 period.

Figure 2 Cali, Colombia. Age-specific incidence and mortality rates for all locations according to sex. 2013-2017. The upper panel shows the age-specific incidence and mortality rates for all cancer sites for each sex. The incidence and mortality curves by sex follow a parallel course, and tend to converge with aging, being more accentuated in women. The bottom panel shows that age-specific incidence and mortality rates in those younger than 50 years are higher in women, because cervical and thyroid cancers develop at younger ages. In older adults, incidence and mortality rates are higher in men due to the influence of aerodigestive and prostate cancers. In childhood, incidence rates are higher in men. 

Figure 3 shows the curves of the specific incidence rates by age (C-TEE), and sex on a logarithmic scale for the main locations; the rates are expressed per 100,000 person-years. Supplementary Table 1S shows the age-specific incidence and mortality rates during the five-year period 2013-2017 and 2016-2020, respectively. Most cancers present a characteristic pattern, C-TTE in those under 50 years of age are similar in men and women; then, they are higher in men, with the exception of thyroid cancer. As age increases, it was observed an increase in the magnitude of age-specific incidence rates in all locations, except in thyroid cancer, which tends to decrease in women older than 60 years. Ovarian, thyroid, and hematolymphoid cancers manifest from an early age; on the other hand, cancers of the prostate, esophagus, and larynx are rare under the age of 50.

Figure 3 Cali, Colombia. Age-specific incidence rates according to type of cancer and sex. 2013-2017 

The age-specific rate curve for hematolymphoid cancers (leukemias and lymphomas) is U-shaped, decreasing from early childhood through adolescence, and then increasing from adulthood to old age. However, this pattern is valid only for leukemias, because in lymphomas the rates increase steadily from infancy to old age.

In melanoma and aerodigestive cancers (stomach, colorectal, esophagus, larynx, and lung) the age-specific incidence rate curve tends to be straight. They differ from each other by the slope of the curve, and by the age at which the cases begin to appear. These cancers are rare before the fourth decade.

The curves for specific cancers of women start from the first decade (ovary and thyroid), third decade (breast and cervix), and later for uterine corpus cancer. Before the age of 50, cervical cancer is more common than breast cancer; then, the frequency is inverted. In all these cancers, the exponential rise associated with age slows down from the fifth and sixth decades onwards, to the point that women with thyroid cancer over 60 years of age have less risk than those under this age; this decrease in ASR suggests a cohort effect, women born 60 years ago had a lower risk of thyroid cancer morbidity. To comprehensively analyze this component, it is necessary to use age-period-cohort models.

Prostate cancer is infrequent before the age of 50, the ASR show exponential growth until the age of 70; then stabilize around the value reached at this age.

General mortality

During the 2011-2020 decade, 127,797 deaths occurred in Cali (Table 2). 72% (91,813) were caused by non-communicable chronic diseases (Group II), 12% (15,567) by communicable diseases (Group I) and 15% (19,422) for injuries (intentional and non-intentional, Group III).

Table 2 Cali. Colombia. Mortality rates standardized by age (World Population) per 100,000 person-year and the annual percentage change (APC) by sex during the period 2011-2020 

Site 2011-2015 2016-2020 APC Code ICD 10
Male Female Male Female Male Female
n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR APC 95% CI APC 95% CI
Oral cavity and pharynx 115 2.0 104 1.3 148 2.3 127 1.4 -1.7* (-2.4 ; -1.0) 0.2 (-0.7 ; 1.0) C00-14
Esophagus 95 1.7 52 0.7 130 2.0 59 0.6 -2.7* (-3.4 ; -2.0) -4.0* (-4.9 ; -3.1) C15
Stomach 807 14.4 659 8.2 928 14.4 703 7.5 -2.1* (-2.4 ; -1.9) -2.4* (-2.8 ; -2.1) C16
Colon and rectum 570 10.2 606 7.5 644 10 770 8.1 1.7* (1.2 ; 2.2) 0.6* (0.1 ; 1.1) C18-21
Liver 316 5.7 372 4.5 366 5.7 360 3.6 -0.2 (-0.7 ; 0.2) -1.8* (-2.3 ; -1.2) C22
Pancreas 252 4.5 300 3.7 345 5.4 430 4.5 0.2 (-0.4 ; 0.9) -0.3 (-0.9 ; 0.3) C25
Bronchi and lung 799 14.4 602 7.3 839 13.1 654 6.7 -1.8* (-2.1 ; -1.5) -1.0* (-1.3 ; -0.6) C34
Skin melanoma 152 2.7 126 1.6 168 2.6 152 1.6 1.8* (1.1 ; 2.6) 1.0* (0.1 ; 1.9) C43-44
Breast 7 0.1 1,054 13.8 7 0.1 1,310 14.9 ~ 0.2 (-0.2 ; 0.5) C50
Cervix uteri 486 6.5 516 6.0 -3.5* (-3.9 ; -3.2) C53
Corpus uteri     138 1.9     223 2.5   -1.2* (-2.1 ; -0.3) C54-C55
Ovary 302 4.0 403 4.6 -0.5 (-1.2 ; 0.2) C56
Prostate 1,012 17.4     1,114 17.1     -0.1 (-0.5 ; 0.3)   C61
Bladder 113 2.0 75 0.9 141 2.2 67 0.6 -0.9* (-1.8 ; -0.1) -2.6* (-3.7 ; -1.6) C67
Lymphoma 330 6.0 290 3.7 423 6.6 355 3.9 -0.3 (-0.8 ; 0.3) -0.9* (-1.5 ; -0.4) C81-C90.C96
Leukemia 270 4.6 246 3.5 285 4.5 271 3.2 -0.7* (-1.2 ; -0.2) -1.1* (-1.8 ; -0.3) C91-95
Other sites 1,193 21.0 1,333 17.2 1,452 22.7 1,520 16.7 -0.4* (-0.7 ; -0.1) -1.1* (-1.4 ; -0.9) **
All sites 6,034 106.7 6,746 86.1 6,992 108.7 7,921 86.1 -0.7* (-0.9 ; -0.5) -1.1* (-1.3 ; -0.9) C00-C97

Number of cases (n).

ASR: Mortality rate standardized by age (ASR).

APC: Annual Percent Change. APC is calculated for the period 1984-2020.

* The APC is significantly different from zero (p <0.05). ~ APC could not be calculated

** C17. C23. C24. C26-C32. C37-C41. C45-C49. C51. C52. C57-C60. C62-C66. C68-C80. C97

The causes of death vary with age; in children, group I diseases predominate; in adolescents and young adults under 40 years of age, injuries (internal and external); and from the fifth decade on, chronic non-communicable diseases. Between the ages of 30 and 60, cancer is more common; and from the eighth decade on, cardiovascular diseases predominate (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Cali, Colombia. Frequency distribution by age of causes of mortality grouped by categories defined by WHO, 2011-2020. WHO: World Health Organization. Group I: Communicable, maternal, perinatal and nutritional. Group II: Non-communicable chronic diseases (Cancer, cardiovascular and others). Group III: Injuries (intentional and non-intentional) 

Cancer mortality (2011-2020)

The 27,693 deaths from cancer that occurred during the decade represented 19.7% of global mortality, and 30.2% of mortality from chronic non-communicable diseases. 53% of cancer deaths occurred in women; 37% in adults (15-64 years); 62% in those aged over 64 years; and 0.8% in children (0-14 years). The incidence mortality ratio was 0.56.

Table 2 shows the number of deaths and mortality rates from cancer according to age, sex and period during the decade 2011-2020. Although the number of deaths was higher in women, the standardized cancer mortality rates per 100,000 person-years for all locations were higher in men, 108.7; that in women 86.1 (period 2016-2020).

During the 2016-2020 period, in men, the five main sites of death from cancer were prostate (ASR: 17.1), stomach (ASR: 14.4), lung (ASR: 13.1), colon and rectum (ASR: 10.0), and lymphomas (ASR: 6.6). In women, the main causes of death were breast cancer (ASR: 14.9), followed by colon and rectal cancer (ASR: 8.1), stomach (ASR: 7.5), lung (ASR: 6.7) and cervix (ASR: 6.0).

Changes in morbidity and mortality

Table 3 shows the trend analysis of incidence (ASR-W-I) and mortality (ASR-W-M) rates for the period 1962-2017, and 1984-2020, respectively. The APC represents the average annual percentage change in rates. Increase or decrease was defined when the APC was significantly different from zero (two-tailed values ​​p <0.05); otherwise, it was considered a stable or flat rate. The information on the age-standardized incidence rates for the period 1962-2017 and the mortality rates for the period 1984-2020 are described in supplementary tables 2S and 3S.

Table 3 Cali, Colombia. Annual percentage change (APC) in incidence (1962-2017) and mortality (1984-2020) by sex. 

Site Mortality Code ICD 10
Male Female Male Female
APC 95% CI APC 95% CI APC 95% CI APC 95% CI
Oral cavity and pharynx -1.0* (-1.3 ; -0.6) -1.0* (-1.5 ; -0.6) -1.7* (-2.4 ; -1.0) 0.2 (-0.7 ; 1.0) C00-14
Esophagus -1.5* (-2.1 ; -0.8) ~ -2.7* (-3.4 ; -2.0) -4.0* (-4.9 ; -3.1) C15
Stomach -1.9* (-2.1 ; -1.8) -1.9* (-2.2 ; -1.7) -2.1* (-2.4 ; -1.9) -2.4* (-2.8 ; -2.1) C16
Colon and rectum 2.2* (1.9 ; 2.5) 1.6* (1.3 ; 1.9) 1.7* (1.2 ; 2.2) 0.6* (0.1 ; 1.1) C18-21
Liver 1.8* (1.2 ; 2.4) 0.6 (-0.1 ; 1.3) -0.2 (-0.7 ; 0.2) -1.8* (-2.3 ; -1.2) C22
Pancreas ~ 0.0 (-0.4 ; 0.3) 0.2 (-0.4 ; 0.9) -0.3 (-0.9 ; 0.3) C25
Bronchi and lung -1.0* (-1.5 ; -0.6) 0.0 (-0.5 ; 0.5) -1.8* (-2.1 ; -1.5) -1.0* (-1.3 ; -0.6) C33-34
Skin melanoma ~ 0.4 (-0.2 ; 1.0) 1.8* (1.1 ; 2.6) 1.0* (0.1 ; 1.9) C43
Breast   1.1* (0.9 ; 1.4)   0.2 (-0.2 ; 0.5) C50
Cervix uteri -3.1* (-3.3 ; -2.9) -3.5* (-3.9 ; -3.2) C53
Corpus uteri   0.2 (-0.2 ; 0.5)   -1.2* (-2.1 ; -0.3) C54-C55
Ovary -0.5* (-0.8 ; -0.1) -0.5 (-1.2 ; 0.2) C56
Prostate 2.1* (1.5 ; 2.7) ~ -0.1 (-0.5 ; 0.3)     C61
Bladder -0.9* (-1.3 ; -0.5) -1.4* (-1.9 ; -0.8) -0.9* (-1.8 ; -0.1) -2.6* (-3.7 ; -1.6) C67
Thyroid 1.9* (1.1 ; 2.7) 2.9* ( 2.6 ; 3.3) -0.8 (-1.9 ; 0.4) -1.2* (-2.2 ; -0.1) C73
Lymphoma 1.0* (0.6 ; 1.3) 1.1* (0.6 ; 1.6) -0.7* (-1.3 ; 0.0) -1.5* (-2.2 ; -0.9) C81-C88, C96
Leukemia 0.8* (0.4 ; 1.1) -0.7* (-1.2 ; -0.2) -0.7* (-1.2 ; -0.2) -1.1* (-1.8 ; -0.3) C91-95
Other sites 0.4* (0.2 ; 0.7) -0.2 (-0.4 ; 0.0) -0.4* (-0.7 ; -0.1) -1.1* (-1.4 ; -0.9) **
All sites¶ 0.4* (0.2 ; 0.6) -0.2* (-0.3 ; 0.0) -0.7* (-0.9 ; -0.5) -1.1* (-1.3 ; -0.9) C00-C97

APC: Annual Percent Change. APC is calculated for the period: 1962-2017 (Incidence) and 1984-2020 (Mortality).

* The APC is significantly different from zero (p <0.05).

**C17, C23, C24, C26-C32, C37-C41, C45-C49, C51, C52, C57-C60, C62-C66, C68-C80, C97

¶ Mortality included C43-44: Melanoma and other skin

Trends in incidence rates 1962-2017

During the period 1962-2017, the sex-specific cancer incidence rate for all locations showed a divergent trend. In men, it increased with an annual average of 0.4% (95% CI: 0.2, 0.6); in women, it decreased with an annual average of 0.2% (95% CI: -0.3; -0.1).

In men and women there was a reduction in the incidence rates of cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, stomach, gallbladder, bladder, and Hodgkin's disease. Cancer of the esophagus, lung and larynx decreased in men; and ovarian and cervical cancer in women.

Incidence rates remained stable in women with cancers of the liver, pancreas, lung, bone, soft tissue tumors, melanoma of the skin, and uterine corpus. In men, there were no changes in myelomonocytic leukemia.

In men and women, increased incidence rates were found for cancers of the kidney, renal pelvis and urethra; colorectal, central nervous system and thyroid. Breast cancer and myelomonocytic leukemia increased in women. In men, cancer of the prostate, testicle, liver, bone, and lymphocytic leukemia.

Trends in mortality rates

Age-standardized cancer mortality rates (TM) for all locations for the 1984-2020 period decreased steadily, with an annual average of 0.7% in men (95% CI: -0.9, -0.5), and 1.1% in women (95% CI: -1.3, -0.9).

For both sexes, there was an increase in mortality rates from colorectal cancer and melanomas; and decreased TMs for malignant tumors of the esophagus, stomach, lung, bladder, lymphomas, and leukemias. In men, the TM due to oral cavity cancer decreased; in women the TM due to cervical and uterine corpus cancer also decreased.

Pancreatic cancer mortality rates remained stable in both sexes. They also remained the same (remained unchanged) for malignant tumors of liver, prostate and thyroid in men; and in the oral cavity, breast and ovary in women.

Changes in trend

Tumors associated with infectious agents

The incidence and mortality rates for cervical and stomach cancer decreased during the evaluated period (Figure 5). In cervical cancer, there was a change in the trend of incidence and mortality rates around 2002 and 2005, respectively. Before 2002, the incidence rate decreased with a mean annual change of 2.8% (95 CI: -3.1, -2.5); and then accelerated to 4.6% (CI95: -5.6, 3.5). In contrast, the trend in mortality rates showed a slowdown; before 2005, the mean annual decrease was 4.4% (95% CI: -5.2, -3.7); then, it decreased to 2% (95% CI: -3.2, -0.8).

Stomach cancer mortality rates in both sexes, and incidence rates in men decreased monotonously (Figure 5). The mean annual decrease in mortality rates was 2.4% (95% CI: -2.8; -2.1) in women; and 2.1% in men (95% CI: -2.2, -1.8).

Figure 5 Cali, Colombia. Trends in cancer incidence rates (1962-2017) and cancer mortality rates (1986-2020). 

The mean annual decrease in stomach cancer incidence rates in men was 2% (95% CI: -2.2, -2.8). In women, there was a point of change in the trend around 1995. Before this year, the mean annual decrease was 1.3% (95% CI: -1.8, -0.8); afterwards, it increased to 2.9% (95% CI: -3.5, -2.3).

Tumors associated with diagnostic and screening activities

Breast cancer:

Two points of change in the trend of incidence rates occurred around the years 1996 and 2001, which determined three periods. Until 1996, incidence rates increased on average 1.3% annually (95% CI: 0.1, 2.5). Then, there was an acceleration of the change and the increase was 5.1% (CI95%: -2; 11.8) until 2001. Since then, there has been a mean annual decrease of 0.6% (CI95%: -2; 0) (Figure 5). The death rate showed a change around 2005.

Prostate cancer:

The behavior was similar, with two points of change in the trend of incidence rates around the years 1988 and 2002, which determined three periods. Until 1988, the incidence rates increased on average 1.3% annually (95% CI: 0.1, 2.5); then, growth accelerated to 6.7% per year (95% CI: 5.1, 8.3). Since 2002, there has been a mean annual decrease of 1.8% (95% CI: -2.6, -1) (Figure 5).

Mortality rates showed a change in trend around 1987; before, the mean annual increase was 18% (95% CI: -6.5, 49.6). Then, the trend reversed, and there was a mean annual decrease of 0.3% (95% CI: -0.7, 0.1).

Colorectal Cancer:

Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates increased monotonously in both sexes; the magnitude of the increase was greater in males. In women, the incidence and mortality rates had a mean annual increase of 1.6% (95% CI: 1.3, 1.9) and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1, 1.1); and in men, the mean annual increase was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.9, 2.5) and 1.7% (95% CI: 1.2, 2.2), respectively (Figure 5).

Thyroid cancer: Incidence rates showed a change in trend around 1994, which determined two growth periods with a mean annual increase of 0.5% (95% CI: -0.6, 1.5) and 4.6 % (95% CI: 4.1, 5.6). In contrast, mortality rates showed a mean annual decrease of 1.2% (95% CI: -2.3, -0.2) (Figure 6).

Figure 6 A. Cali, Colombia. Trends in thyroid cancer incidence rates by sex and type of tumor morphology (1962-2017). The trend in thyroid cancer incidence rates differs according to the histological type. Papillary carcinomas have increased, especially in women. Follicular and anaplastic carcinomas have decreased over time. B. Cali, Colombia. Changing patterns of gastroesophageal junction cancer, 1962-2017. Incidence rates for proximal esophagus and distal stomach cancers have decreased since the 1960s. The incidence rates for gastroesophageal junction cancer have increased since 1970. 

Cancer related to tobacco use

Table 3 shows decreased incidence and mortality rates for esophageal, bronchial and lung cancer, and bladder cancer in both sexes. The TM of laryngeal and oral cavity cancer decreased only in men (Figure 5).

In cancer of the trachea, bronchi and lung, there were changes in the trend of incidence rates around 1986 in women, and 1991 in men, which determined two periods of divergent trend. Before 1986 and 1991, incidence rates increased by an annual average of 1.8% (95% CI: 0.8, 2.8) and 4.9% (95% CI: 2.9, 7) in men and women, respectively. After these dates, there was a mean annual decrease of 2.7% (95% CI: -3.4, -2.1) in men, and 1.2% (95% CI: -1.7, -0.6) in women (Figure 5).

The decrease in lung cancer mortality rates was monotonous in both sexes, with a mean annual change of 2.7% (95% CI: -3.4, -2.1) in men, and 1.2% (95% CI %: -1.7; -0.6) in women (Figure 5).

Quality indicators

Supplementary Table 4S presents the quality indicators for new cases in selected locations for the period 2013-2017; the age is known for almost 100% of the cases. For all cancer sites, the percentage of cases with morphological verification (MV) was 86.1% in men and 88.8% in women, with a range of 80-99%, except in the liver (75.4% in men. and 73.1% in women), lung (67.3% in men and 69.7% in women), and pancreas (58.7% in men and 59.4% in women).

Consistent values ​​are observed in the mortality incidence ratio, except for liver (1.26 in men and 1.47 in women), lung (1.09 men and 1.05 women), and pancreas (1.06 men and 1.08 women). In these locations, the number of deaths was greater than the number of cases detected in life.

The percentage of cases with a death certificate as the only evidence of cancer diagnosis (DCO) varied between 0-3%, except in pancreas (8.1% in men), liver (6.4% in women), bladder (5.1% in women) and lung (5.1%). The most frequent locations present a low percentage of cases with a death certificate as the only evidence of a cancer diagnosis.

For the period 2011-2020, 99.9% of deaths were certified by a doctor; the proportion of cancers with a poorly defined site (C76-C80, C97) was 4.8%, and 0.8% for unspecified uterine cancer (C55). Only 2 (0.007%) of the death certificates did not have age information. The proportion of deaths classified as ill-defined signs, symptoms, and causes (R00-R99) was 0.9%.

Discussion

Population-based cancer registries are an indispensable tool for cancer control 12. In Cali, the cancer registry operates since 1962, providing valid and continuous information on new cases of all types of cancer, in permanent residents of Cali, through active search and notification. This article complements the changes observed in the temporal trends of cancer incidence and mortality rates in Cali over 60 years 14,36. This information can be used by regional and national health authorities to build some indicators in order to monitor the City Cancer Challenge initiative 37,38 and the current 10-year plan for cancer control in Colombia (PDCC) 22.

In other regions of Latin America there is difficulty in evaluating interventions for cancer control due to the lack of quality information 39; and because there is inequity in the coverage of the cancer registry. In Africa, Asia, and Latin America, the coverage of high-quality cancer registries is less than 9% of the population. In contrast, the equivalent coverage in North America and Europe is 83% and 32%, respectively. To narrow this gap and improve the quality of cancer registries in low- and middle-income countries, the Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development (GICR) seeks to build local and sustainable infrastructure by establishing regional centers of expertise 40.

Keys to the success of the Cali cancer registry

Colombia, with its Cali cancer registry, is part of a select group of 17 cancer registries from twelve countries that have disseminated quality information on cancer incidence for half a century in the eleven volumes of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. The other countries are Japan, Israel, Denmark, Finland, Slovenia, Norway, Sweden, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada 41.

Several factors have been determining factors in guaranteeing the continuity of the RPCC's operations. The permanent support of Universidad del Valle as a sponsor; a clear definition of cancer case, registry area and population at risk; and the implementation of standard methods to guarantee quality 27. In the Colombian model, it has been successful for cancer registries to be linked to university academic centers with the support and partial funding of the Municipal Health Secretariats and the National Cancer Institute of Colombia 42.

In addition, universities favor the sustainability of the work team and facilitate the formulation of research projects to solve specific problems in the environment. The RPCC has been directed by research professors from the Pathology Specialization Program of the Universidad del Valle. The University and the graduate program have high quality accreditation before the Colombian Ministry of Education 43. In the Faculty of Health, dozens of graduate students have done their graduate work; and undergraduate students have participated in the periodic (five-year) survey carried out by the cancer registry of the city's oncology services, which aims to improve comprehensiveness. The 75 pathologists who graduated from the program during the last half century constitute a formidable support network for the cancer registry because they currently direct the high and medium complexity pathology laboratories in Cali; and as university professors, they contribute to the training of human talent in health in the six universities of the city.

Cali: Interpretation of changes in cancer trends

The data presented here may reflect many events and trends that are taking place today in many Latin American countries. In Cali, during the 2013-17 five-year period, global cancer incidence rates increased for all locations in men, APC = 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.6); and they decreased in women, APC = -0.2 (95% CI: -0.3, -0.1). Cancers of the prostate, stomach, lung, colorectal and hematolymphoid were the most common in men (55.4% of cases); in women, they were breast, colorectal, thyroid, cervix, stomach and hematolymphoid (64.4% of cases). Cancer represents 23% of the 6,4851 deaths that occurred in Cali during the 2016-2020 period. Changes in demographics, lifestyles, and in known risk factors determine variations in cancer trends that are reflected in the information presented here.

Interpretation of changes in cancer incidence and mortality trends focuses on breast, cervical, stomach, prostate, and colorectal; prioritized by the current PDCC 2011-2021; and in cancers related to tobacco use. The role of the RPCC in the identification and resolution of public health problems of cancers related to infectious agents (stomach and cervix) is described through specific transdisciplinary research projects that have allowed the social appropriation of knowledge.

Changes in population and risk factors

Cali is an immigration center in southwestern Colombia. The population has quadrupled in the last 60 years; and today, there are 48 persons older than 65 years for every 100 persons aged under 15; 95% of the people live in urban areas. Fertility rates fell to figures slightly below what is known as the replacement level (2.05 children per woman); and life expectancy increased to 76 years; this average is equivalent to that of high-income countries, 25 years ago 16,44.

In Colombia, the burden of morbidity and mortality has changed from a predominance of infectious diseases to an increasing contribution of chronic, non-communicable diseases. This epidemiological and demographic dynamic transforms the age structure due to population growth and aging. As in other Latin American countries, there are changes in lifestyle associated with urbanization, increased income, altered social and family structures, and more sedentary daily activities and occupations; these changes modify exposure to risk factors. Alcohol consumption and excess body weight, through changes in diet and physical activity, are established carcinogens 45. Other known factors are unprotected sex, air pollution, indoor smoke and contaminated injections; they account for 35% of cancer deaths worldwide 46,47. The main etiology for some types of cancer is still unknown. Genetics, obesity and some dietary regimens have been related with breast, prostate and colon cancer. Only few proportions of prostate cancer has been described having a relationship with black race.

Hormone-dependent cancers associated with screening

The tumor cells of breast cancer and prostate cancer are hormone-dependent and require estrogens and testosterone for growth. Mammography and digital rectal examination plus serum PSA detection are used in population screening programs for these tumors. Increasingly improved imaging tests plus population screening of asymptomatic people may detect indolent cancers with limited or no growth for long periods of time that will not result in patient death. As a result, there will be overdiagnosis and overtreatment as a consequence of tumor non-progression or competitive mortality due to other causes. It is imperative to develop, for each type of cancer, specific biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic targets, and to predict the biological behavior of tumors.

Prostate cancer

In Cali, 30% of the population self-recognize as Afro-Colombian ethnicity. Prostate cancer incidence rates increased over the past 60 years, rapidly between 1986 and 2002 11,48, reached a plateau around 2005, and then declined over the past decade. Once the use of screening tests has stabilized, the rates will tend to stabilize in the coming years, as has happened in countries with a high human development index (HDI). To interpret the trends in the incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer, it is necessary to take into account early detection activities, and that there are known risk factors in the etiology of prostate cancer (age, racial group and family history); while there are others that seem to be associated, but without robust evidence, such as diet and obesity 5,6.

The increase was greater in the age group screened with PSA. Similar changes have occurred in Europe, North America, and Australia; and are associated with serum PSA determination as a screening test and with new diagnostic methods (like obtaining sextant biopsies using fine needles guided by transrectal ultrasound) and treatment. Transurethral resection and minimally invasive procedures have modified urological practice, and the tissues obtained are taken for histopathological review and cancer may present as an incidental finding.

Detection of all prevalent cases is inefficient for prostate cancer control, because the frequency of prostate cancer increases with age; and in step-section autopsy specimens, it ranges from 68% to 77% for men aged 60 to 79 years 49. Current screening methods do not differentiate between indolent and aggressive cancers. To optimize the population screening of prostate cancer, it is urgently needed the development of biomarkers that detect aggressive forms of the disease, in order to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment of patients.

Breast cancer

In Cali, as in most countries in the world, breast cancer incidence rates increased 5.1% annually from the nineties to the beginning of the 21st century, (95% CI: -1.2, 11.8). This increase coincided with decreased fertility, younger menarche, older age of first term pregnancy, use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy, and increased opportunity screening activities with mammography. Since 2005, the curve stabilized for a short period; and in the last decade, there was a reversal of the trend with a decrease of 0.6% per year in incidence rates (95% CI: -1.2, 0.0). This pattern of change was more evident in the population subjected to screening, 50-69 years, and part of the increase may be concentrated in cases with early stages of the disease. Once the use of screening tests has stabilized, breast cancer incidence rates tend to stabilize, as long as other factors causing the disease have not changed 15,50,51.

It is the first time that this trend pattern has been documented in a Latin American cancer registry. The decrease in the risk of breast cancer was observed 20 years ago in high-income countries, coinciding with the decrease in the use of hormones for menopausal therapy and the saturation of screening activities 50,52.

Although the incidence rates of breast cancer have increased in the course of the last decades, the values ​​are low in relation to the notorious demographic changes in Cali (with a considerable increase in life expectancy). 30% of the population of Cali recognize themselves as Afro-Colombian. The incidence of breast cancer is six times lower in Afro-descendant women, compared with other ethnic groups. Breast cancer incidence rates in Uganda and Algeria have doubled in recent years, but it is much lower than in Afro-descendant women in the US and other Western countries. Other sociodemographic and biological determinants of the difference in breast cancer risk between high- and low-income countries remain to be clarified 53.

In Europe, Central Asia and North America, breast cancer mortality has decreased by around 20% (95% CI: 11; 27) due to advances in treatments and early detection by mammographic screening. In the other regions of the world, including Africa and Latin America, mortality rates have increased 0.23% per year (95% CI: 0.20, 0.25) during the last 27 years, due to increases in incidence rates and because the diagnosis is made at a late stage, due to the lack of population screening programs, as well as the barriers to cancer treatment and care 54,55.

Cali shows progress in the control of breast cancer; mortality has remained stable during the last 30 years, despite the increase in incidence rates, because opportunistic screening activities have contributed to detecting cases in less advanced stages 14,15. As in all low- and middle-income countries. Survival from breast cancer in Cali is still low; for the 2013-2017 five-year period, it was 81.1% (95% CI: 78.7; 83.3), nine percentage points lower than that observed in the United States and Europe 51.

Low-to-middle income countries have difficulties in establishing organized population screening programs, because they lack the financial resources to train the required human talent and implement the efficient infrastructure to detect and treat detected cancer cases in a timely and adequate manner 56. To reduce the burden of disease, we must increase healthy behaviors, because 20% of breast cancers worldwide are due to modifiable risk factors, including alcohol consumption, excess body weight and physical inactivity. Although the evidence is limited, breast examination in women in low- and middle-income countries has shown that can reduce the stage of breast cancer at the moment of doing the diagnosis 54.

Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is considered a marker of human development. The ASRs are at least six times higher in countries with very high HDI compared to countries with low HDI, probably related to changes in the prevalence of risk factors linked to Western lifestyles: increased consumption of red meat and processed foods, refined carbohydrates, alcohol and tobacco consumption, obesity, and physical inactivity 57.

In Colombia, the Human Development Index (HDI) in 2019 was 0.767 points, which represents an improvement of 0.164 points compared to 1990 58. Coinciding with this increase, in Cali, the incidence rates of colorectal cancer (ASR/100,000) almost tripled, they went from 6.6 in 1964 to 17.3 in 2017; the same happened with mortality rates. However, incidence rates continue to be lower than those observed in countries with a very high HDI (United States (36) and United Kingdom (38.3)) 59. During the last 60 years, the incidence and mortality rates for CCR in Cali increased an annual average of 2.2% (95% CI: 1.9; 2.5) and 1.7% (95% CI: 1.2; 2.2), respectively. In contrast, countries with high HDI have evidence of CCR control, because premature mortality from CCR is avoidable; and since 1985 and 1976, there has been a significant decrease in incidence and mortality rates, respectively.

In Cali, the 5-year net survival of the CCR was lower than that reported by the SEER program, 54% vs 64.7%. This 10-point gap highlights the deficiencies of health services for risk control, early detection and comprehensive treatment of patients with CCR. Taking into account the upward trend in the incidence and mortality of the disease, it is a priority to strengthen opportunity screening activities in small Colombian cities; and to establish a population screening program in large capital cities in order to guarantee timely and quality access to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with this disease.

Cancers related to tobacco use

In Cali there was a turning point in the trend of lung cancer incidence rates around 1986 in women, and 1991 in men. Before these years, incidence rates increased an annual average of 1.8% (95% CI: 0.8, 2.8) in men, and 4.9% (95% CI: 2.9, 7) in women. After these dates, there was a mean annual decrease of 2.7% (95% CI: -3.4, -2.1) in men and 1.2% (95% CI: -1.7, -0.6) in women, Figure 5. The trend in lung cancer incidence rates for both sexes in Cali can be interpreted as a reflection of a failed tobacco-related epidemic, which began in the 1960s and stopped in the 1980s. This phenomenon is related to a very strong campaign against smoking that has been carried out in Colombia since the 1970s 14. Incidence and mortality rates for other cancers related to tobacco use (esophagus, lung, and bladder) have also decreased in both sexes. Mortality rates for cancer of the larynx and oral cavity decreased only in men.

The causal association between lung cancer and smoking is well documented. Lung cancer is more common in men, but the gender gap has narrowed. Lung cancer incidence and mortality rates have been declining in men and increasing in women, globally. This can be explained by the decline in the prevalence of smoking in men, which was followed by an acceptance of smoking by women in many countries. Indoor exposure to cooking and heating fumes using charcoal or combustible materials in unventilated stoves could also increase the risk of lung cancer in populations of women who had a low level of smoking 60.

Social appropriation of knowledge. Public health problems are solved with research

In the 1960s, the RPCC identified that gastric and cervical cancer, now related to infectious agents, were the main cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in the Cali population. To resolve these concerns, it was created a research group that has persisted over time, providing valid information on the measures of cancer occurrence and solving the problems through specific research projects.

Gastric Cancer: Transdisciplinary Research

In the first publication corresponding to the period 1962-1966, the RPCC disclosed that 75% of the population of Cali were immigrants from other Colombian regions. The specific gastric cancer incidence rates by place of origin showed that the migrants from the Nariño Province, located in the mountainous regions of the southwestern Colombian Andes, had the highest rate of gastric cancer: more than three times higher than the of the natives of Cali, and five times higher than that of those born on coasts regions 61. Coinciding with the Inter-American study of mortality, more than 30% of the adults who died in Cali underwent autopsy and the presence of intestinal metaplasia in the gastric mucosa of 1,500 autopsies in adults was documented. The highest prevalence was found in immigrants from Nariño (58%), again three times higher than that of natives of Cali (19%) or those born on the coasts (21%) 61.

The investigations focused on Nariño during the last 50 years; the RPCC coordinated the fieldwork activities of the projects, and the successive directors of the RPCC were the principal investigators of the different investigations. In the 1970s, the detailed study of gastric biopsies led to the characterization of the stages of the precancerous process, called "the Correa cascade" 62. Histopathologic lesions represent the following sequential changes: chronic active gastritis, multifocal atrophy (glandular loss), intestinal metaplasia (complete and incomplete), and dysplasia; and dietary surveys show that populations at high risk of cancer have two things in common: excessive salt intake 63 and poor intake of fresh, unprocessed fruits and vegetables 64,65. In the eighties, the dynamics of the changes of the precancerous process were described, characterized by a slow progression, with multiple partial episodes of progression towards more advanced lesions and regression to less advanced lesions 66.

Since the 1990s, the hypothesis of n-nitroso compounds as determinants of gastric cancer has been reconsidered 67, and all efforts reoriented towards the investigation of the relationship between H. pylori and gastric cancer in Nariño, it has been documented that the infection begins in the first months of age 68 and reaches a prevalence of 50% at two years, and close to 90% at 9 years. In adults, serological methods show that the infection persists in more than 90% throughout life. Studies on the method of transmission concluded that the initial infection was related to the presence of infected older siblings in the home 69.

Applying the knowledge obtained during 30 years of research, a controlled clinical trial was conducted in Nariño, which documented a decrease in the frequency of precancerous lesions with antioxidant dietary supplements and antibiotics to eradicate H. pylori infection 70. This research demonstrated that the protective effect of being free of infection is only evident after 6 years of follow-up, and persists years after the intervention has ended 71. This primary prevention strategy through chemoprevention is an alternative to the discordant results and low cost-effectiveness of the early detection of gastric cancer in Latin America, and the unsuccessful efforts to obtain a vaccine against H. pylori70.

In the last 15 years, progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis by dynamically integrating the epidemiological guideline with multidisciplinary teams of basic sciences 72-74. Some of the mechanisms of oxidative damage and genotoxicity caused by H. pylori infection were elucidated, and the ancestral origin of the bacterial strains was traced 75,76. The abrupt break in co-evolution between a bacterium and humans is shown to cause more damage than the known virulence factors of H. pylori77.

Cervical cancer

In the 1960s, the RPCC in the report for the period 1962-1966 published that cervical cancer was the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from cancer in Cali women 14. The Municipal Public Health Secretary implemented a program for the early detection of cervical cancer through the use of repeated cytology as a primary screening test, in order to make the definitive diagnosis and treatment 78. The quality control in the central reference laboratory of the Municipal Public Health Secretary was carried out by pathologists from the Universidad del Valle, who documented in in the mid-1980s that the risk of developing invasive carcinoma is at least 10 times higher in women not subjected to screening than in those subjected to screening 77. Invasive cancer incidence rates have consistently decreased over the last 60 years; and since 2000, they are lower than those of cervix cancer precursor lesions (Figure 7).

Figure 7 Cali, Colombia. Impact of Pap smear on cervical cancer risk. A. Cali, Colombia. Prevalence rates of vaginal citology screening (1964-1978). B-C. Compared with incidence rates of in situ and invasive carcinoma of the cervix uterine, trough 1964-2012. The risk of developing invasive carcinoma is at least 10 times greater in women non-screened than is screened women. A marked and steady and significant decline in incidence and mortality rates is observed trough 1964-2012. D. Breast cancer. The incidence rates increase steadily, more markedly after 1996, then decrease. 

Around the 1990s, two events occurred in Cali that impacted the cervical cancer detection program. The Ministry of Health decentralized the cytology laboratory, which impaired quality control. With the health law reform, in 1993, the organized population screening program deteriorated and early cancer detection lost its vertical and centralized nature, becoming a set of opportunity screening activities carried out by insurers and their service networks, which have fragmented cancer care 79. These phenomena could explain why there is a slowdown in the decline in mortality rates in the second decade of the 21st century. Before 2005, the mean annual decrease was 4.4% (95% CI: -5.2, -3.7) and then it decreased to 2% (95% CI: -3.2, -0.8).

In the 1990s, Dr. Nubia Muñoz demonstrated the causal association between HPV and cervical cancer. The first population case-control studies on HPV and cervical cancer were conducted in Spain and Colombia, two countries with contrasting rates of cervical cancer, per 100,000 women per year; Spain with one of the lowest incidence values (5.7), and Cali with a high incidence (48.2) 80. The Cali Population Cancer Registry was essential in the identification of incident cases of cervical cancer diagnosed during the study period in this city. The results of these studies have been considered the first unequivocal molecular epidemiological evidence of the causal association between HPV and cervical cancer 81. The demonstration that infection with certain types of HPV is the main and necessary cause of CaCu, modified the primary prevention through the use of prophylactic vaccines against HPV in adolescents, and secondary prevention through the introduction of the HPV test as primary screening test 82,83.

In 2012, Colombia introduced the HPV vaccination program in schools, which reached a coverage of 90% of the target population during the first year. In 2014, some teenagers from a school in Carmen de Bolívar had a massive psychogenic reaction to vaccination. The government response to the crisis was late and inappropriate; by 2016, acceptance of the HPV vaccine among eligible girls decreased to 14% for the first dose, and 5% for the full cycle 84.

The Municipal Public Health Secretary of Cali, with an intra and intersectoral work strategy and with political commitment at the municipal and national level plus budgetary measures necessary to strengthen coverage, achieved by 2019 that the coverage reached 75% in the 9-year-old population with the first dose 85. Unfortunately, the Covid-19 pandemic interfered with the continuity of the HPV vaccination reactivation program.

In 2017, the RPCC evaluated the effect of vaccination on oral HPV-16 infection in high school students in Cali, by detecting HPV-16 DNA in samples from the oral cavity and throat of 1,784 high school students from both sexes, aged from 14 to 17 years, in 21 schools in the city. The students immunized with two doses had a reduction of 72% (CI95%: 0.07, 0.88) in the detection of HPV-16, in comparison with those not vaccinated 86.

Interaction of the Cali Cancer Registry with its environment

Due to Colombia's advances in cancer control and the strength of the RPCC, Cali was prioritized among hundreds of cities and was the first city in the world to implement the City Cancer Challenge (C/Can) initiative. The objective of C/Can is to expand coverage and improve the quality of cancer care in cities in low- and middle-income countries 37,38. Diagnostic pathology services are essential for cancer health systems, and the morphological verification of tumors is one of the main quality criteria in cancer registries; unfortunately, in low- and middle-income countries, there are limitations to implementing minimum quality standards in pathology laboratories.

To overcome the limitations above described, the Cali Cancer Registry worked closely with local health authorities and city pathologists to identify and implement sustainable solutions adapted to the local context. The RPCC actively participated in the implementation of the C/Can initiative and contributed to improve the resources and infrastructure of the pathology laboratory of the main state university hospital in the city (HUV). Based on the epidemiological profile of cancer in Cali, immunohistochemistry was implemented; and with the guidance of the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), a workshop was organized to improve the quality of pathology diagnosis, with the participation of pathologists and technologists in cytology and histology 87. After the workshop, a quality control manual was drawn up, which includes the minimum quality standards for all the medium and low complexity pathology laboratories in Cali. At the HUV, the protocols of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) were implemented to generate synoptic pathology reports of all tumor excisions 88, also an internal quality control program, and an external program with the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) 89. In parallel, and as a first step towards the objective of improving and integrating information systems in Cali, the RPCC has promoted the use of cancer notification systems, and has supported the creation of hospital cancer registries in four tertiary-level hospitals with integrated oncology services 87.

Role of cancer registries in cancer control

The PDCC aims to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this group of diseases. Cancer registries provide incidence, mortality, and survival estimates that serve as baseline indicators to monitor the impact of interventions 42. Through collaborative work with national reporting systems, it may contribute to the construction and monitoring of cancer survivor cohorts. The survival estimate is a summary measure that shows us the efficacy of cancer care and interventions for risk control and early detection of the disease. It is a priority that cancer registries collect information on the tumor stage for cancers prioritized by the PDCC, and that they carry out timely analysis of the cancer situation in the area of ​​influence, in order to contribute to knowledge management. With the information from cancer registries, health authorities have objective inputs to plan the infrastructure and human talent needs of the oncology services network.

Strengths and limitations

The interaction of the RPCC with the academy and collaborative work with the network of state and private oncology services; regional and national health authorities have been decisive in the continuity of cancer registry operations during the last 60 years in Cali. The information disclosed in this article represents the average risk of becoming ill and dying from cancer in Cali, a city of 2.2 million inhabitants, with 30% Afro-Colombian population.

The notification systems of the Colombian Ministry of Health facilitate the collection of cancer incidence information, and contribute to ensuring that information be timely. Unfortunately, cancer information in medium complexity pathology laboratories continues in unstructured formats, so great efforts are required to consolidate the information. It is important to strengthen hospital cancer registries in institutions that have integrated cancer services. However, it is necessary to standardize the methods to achieve comparability and implement interoperability schemes and standards for the transfer of information.

One of the major limitations of this study is the lack of information on staging at the time of diagnosis, and active follow-up of prevalent cancer cases.

The mortality: incidence ratio was greater than one in liver, lung and pancreas tumors. This phenomenon can have several causes, such as the lack of exhaustiveness in the extraction of information in the cancer registry, difficulties for patients to accessing, as well as for having a timely oncological care, patients who do not consult for personal reasons, and lack of diagnosis, the fact that that patients with fast-growing tumors can die between the consultation interval, without being detected in time.

Specific investigations are required to detect and correct the determinants of this underreporting. Collaborative interinstitutional work with hospital cancer registries and the entities in charge of cancer notification (SIVIGILA and CAC) will make it possible to correct this limitation of cancer information in Cali

Acknowledgments:

To all patients and all cancer care services in Cali.

References

1. World Health Organization. Non-communicable diseases; 2021. Cited: 2021 May 26. available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseasesLinks ]

2. World Health Organization. 10 facts on noncommunicable diseases . World Health Organization; 2013. Cited: 2021 Sep 21. Available from: https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/noncommunicable_diseases/en/Links ]

3. The Cancer Atlas. The Burden of Cancer. Vol. 2018, The Cancer Atlas; 2019. Cited: 2021 May 26. Available from: https://canceratlas.cancer.org/the-burden/the-burden-of-cancer/Links ]

4. World Health Organization. WHO report on cancer: setting priorities, investing wisely and providing care for all; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-report-on-cancer-setting-priorities-investing-wisely-and-providing-care-for-allLinks ]

5. Global Cancer Observatory. Estimated age-standardized incidence rates (World) in 2020, worldwide, both sexes, all ages . IARC Publications. 2020. Cited: 2021 May 26. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheets.pdf [ Links ]

6. World Health Organization. Cancer Prevention. 2021. Cited: 2021 Sep 21. p. 1-13. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_2Links ]

7. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals United Nations Development Programme. Goals 3 Good health and well-being. 2015. Cited: 2021 May 26. Available from: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals#good-healthLinks ]

8. Ward ZJ, Scott AM, Hricak H, Atun R. Global costs, health benefits, and economic benefits of scaling up treatment and imaging modalities for survival of 11 cancers: a simulation-based analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(3):341-50. [ Links ]

9. World Health Organization. Cancer. 2021. Cited: 2021 May 26. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancerLinks ]

10. Rivillas JC, Huertas Quintero JA, Montaño Caicedo JI, Ospina Martínez ML. Advances in eHealth in Colombia: Adoption of the National Cancer Information System. Pan Am J public Heal. 2014;35(5-6):446-52. [ Links ]

11. Bravo LE, Muñoz N. Epidemiology of cancer in Colombia. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018; 49(1): 09-12. [ Links ]

12. Bray F, Znaor A, Cueva P, Korir A, Ullrich A, Swaminathan R, et al. Planning and developing population-based cancer registration in low- and middle-income settings. IARC technical Publications No.43. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon (Fr); 2014. [ Links ]

13. Correa P, Llanos G. Morbidity and mortality from cancer in cali, colombia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1966;36(4):717-45. [ Links ]

14. Bravo LE, Collazos T, Collazos P, García LS, Correa P. Trends of cancer incidence and mortality in Cali, Colombia. 50 years experience. Colomb Med. 2012; 43: 246-55. [ Links ]

15. Bravo LE, García LS, Collazos P, Carrascal E, Ramírez O, Collazos T, et al. Reliable information for cancer control in Cali, Colombia. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018;49(1):23-34. [ Links ]

16. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Estimaciones y proyecciones de poblacion. DANE. 2021. Cited: 2021 May 30. p. 1-9. Available from: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/proyecciones-de-poblacionLinks ]

17. World Bank. Population ages 65 and above. Browse by Country or Indicator Data Bank Microdata Data Catalog. 2020. Cited: 2021 Sep 20. p. 1-18. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.DIAB.ZS?view=chartLinks ]

18. Departamento Administrativo de Planeación Municipal. Documentos de Cali en Cifras; 2020. Available from: https://www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/137803/documentos-cali-en-cifras/Links ]

19. Alberto C, Calderón A, Botero JC. Colombian healthcare system: 20 years of achievements and problems. Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16(6):2817-28. [ Links ]

20. Gómez-Arias RD, Nieto E. Colombia: What has happened with its health reform? Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2014;31(4):733-9. [ Links ]

21. Lamprea E, García J. Closing the gap between formal and material health care coverage in Colombia. Heal Hum Rights J . 2016;18(2):49-65. [ Links ]

22. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Plan Decenal para el Control del Cancer en Colombia 2012-2020; 2012. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Documents/Plan-Decenal-Cancer/PlanDecenal_ControlCancer_2012-2021.pdfLinks ]

23. Murcia E, Aguilera J, Wiesner C, Pardo C. Oncology services supply in Colombia. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018; 49(1): 89-96. [ Links ]

24. Instituto Nacional de Salud. Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia en Salud Pública -SIVIGILA. Vigilancia Lineamientos y documentos. Cited: 2021 Sep 21. Available from: https://www.ins.gov.co/Direcciones/Vigilancia/Paginas/Lineamientos-y-documentos.aspxLinks ]

25. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Cuenta de Alto Costo. Quiénes somos; 2021. Cited: 2021 Sep 21. Available from: https://cuentadealtocosto.org/site/quienes-somos/Links ]

26. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución número 000247 de 2014. Por la cual se establece el reporte para el registro de pacientes con cáncer. Colombia; 2014. Available from: https://cuentadealtocosto.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/resolucion_000247_de_2014.pdf. [ Links ]

27. García LS, Bravo LE, Collazos P, Ramírez O, Carrascal E, Nuñez M, et al. Cali cancer registry methods. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018;49(1):109-20. [ Links ]

28. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Vol. 2 Instruct, ICD-10. World Health Organization; 2010 [ Links ]

29. Ferlay J. Chapter 6 : Processing of data. Situ. 2009; IX(230):95-8. [ Links ]

30. Tyczynski JE, Démaret E, Parkin DM. Standards and Guidelines for Cancer Registration in Europe: The ENCR recommendations. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization: Lyon; 2003. Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Technical-Publications/Standards-And-Guidelines-For-Cancer-Registration-In-Europe-2003 [ Links ]

31. Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: Principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(5): 756-64. [ Links ]

32. Lin HN, Gu XY, Zhang SW, Zeng HM, Wei WW, Zheng RS. Analysis on incidence and mean age at diagnosis for Global Cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018; 40(7): 543-9. [ Links ]

33. National Cancer Institute Bethesda. Program SR. National Cancer Institute SEER Stat software. 2015. [ Links ]

34. Kim H, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000; 19(3): 335-51. [ Links ]

35. Cendales R, Pardo C. Quality of death certification in Colombia. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018; 49(1): 121-7. [ Links ]

36. Bravo LE, García LS, Collazos PA. Cancer survival in Cali, Colombia: A population-based study, 1995-2004. Colomb Med (Cali). 2014; 45(3): 110-6. [ Links ]

37. Bravo LE, Arboleda OL, Ramirez O, Durán A, Rendler-García M, Frech S, et al. Cali, Colombia, key learning city C/Can 2025: City cancer challenge. Colomb Med (Cali). 2017; 48(2): 39-40. [ Links ]

38. Adams C, Henshall S, Torode J, D'Cruz AK, Kumar HS, Aranda S. C/Can 2025: City Cancer Challenge, a new initiative to improve cancer care in cities. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):286-7. [ Links ]

39. Gupta S, Howard SC, Hunger SP, Antillon FG, Metzger ML, Israels T, et al. Treating Childhood Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Chapter 7. In: Gelband P, Jha RS, Horton. S. Disease Control Priorities, Cancer. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: World Bank.; 2015. Available from: http://dcp-3.org/chapter/900/treating-childhood-cancers-low-and-middle-income-countriesLinks ]

40. Piñeros M, Abriata MG, Mery L, Bray F. Cancer registration for cancer control in Latin America: a status and progress report. Pan Am J Public Health. 2017;41(e2):1-8. [ Links ]

41. Forman D, Bray F, Brewster DH, Mbalawa CG, Kohler B, Piñeros M, et al. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Vol. X. Vol. 164, IARC Scientific Publications. 2014. [ Links ]

42. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 1383 de 2013 Plan Decenal para el Control del Cáncer en Colombia, 2012-2021. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/resolucion-1383-de-2013.pdf. [ Links ]

43. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Resolución 003149 01 Mar 2021 Acreditación en Alta Calidad al Programa de Especialización en Anatomía Patológica y Patología Clínica de La Universidad del Valle, Colombia; 2021. [ Links ]

44. Departamento nacional de estadísticas. DANE. Resultados Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda 2018 . Cali, Valle del Cauca. 2019. Available from: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/censo-nacional-de-poblacion-y-vivenda-2018Links ]

45. Bosetti C, Malvezzi M, Chatenoud L, Negri E, F. Levi, Vecchia LC. Trends in cancer mortality in the Americas, 1970-2000. Ann Oncol. 2005;3(16):489-511. [ Links ]

46. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. 17 Goals to Transform Our World. 2016. Cited: 2021 Sep 22. p. 1-7. Available from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/Links ]

47. Naciones Unidas. Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. Vol. 66172, Informe de síntesis del Secretario General sobre la agenda de desarrollo sostenible después de 2015; 2014. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/files/2015/01/SynthesisReportSPA.pdfLinks ]

48. Restrepo JA, Bravo LE, Garcia-Perdomo HA, García LS, Collazos P, Carbonell J. Incidencia, mortalidad y supervivencia al cáncer de próstata en Cali, Colombia, 1962-2011. Salud Publica Mex. 2014;56(5):440-7. [ Links ]

49. Sandhu GS, Andriole GL. Overdiagnosis of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst - Monogr. 2012;2011(45):146-51. [ Links ]

50. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. [ Links ]

51. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Niksic M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1-53. [ Links ]

52. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Niksic M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival: analysis of individual records for 37,513,025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers during 2000-2014 from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries (CONCORD-3). Physiol Behav. 2019;176(3):139-48. [ Links ]

53. Francies FZ, Hull R, Khanyile R, Dlamini Z. Breast cancer in low-middle income countries: abnormality in splicing and lack of targeted treatment options. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(5):1568-91. [ Links ]

54. Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, Dewar JA, Thompson SG, Wilcox M. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: An independent review. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(11):2205-40. [ Links ]

55. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends - An update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(1):16-27 [ Links ]

56. Shah SC, Kayamba V, Peek RM, Heimburger D. Cancer control in low- And middle-income countries: Is it time to consider screening? J Glob Oncol. 2019;2019(5):1-8. [ Links ]

57. Cortés A, Eduardo Bravo L, Stella García L, Collazos P. Incidencia, mortalidad y supervivencia por cáncer colorrectal en Cali, Colombia, 1962-2012. Rev Salud pública México. 2014;56(5):457-64. [ Links ]

58. United Nations Development Programmehttps (UNDP). The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. Human Development Report 2020. 2020. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-reportLinks ]

59. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). GLOBOCAN 2020. Estimation and provision of global cancer indicators descriptive epidemiological cancer research. 2020. Cited: 2021 Sep 23. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/homeLinks ]

60. Wong MCS, Lao XQ, Ho KF, Goggins WB, Tse SLA. Incidence and mortality of lung cancer: Global trends and association with socioeconomic status. Nature Sci Reports. 2017;7: 14300(1):1-9. [ Links ]

61. Correa P, Cuello C, Duque E. Carcinoma and intestinal metaplasia of the stomach in Colombian migrants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970;44(2):297-306. [ Links ]

62. Correa P, Haenszel W, Cuello C, Tannenbaum S, Archer M. A Model for Gastric Cancer Epidemiology. Lancet. 1975;2(7924):58-60. [ Links ]

63. Joossens J V., Hill MJ, Elliott P, Stamler R, Stamler J, Lesaffre E, et al. Dietary salt, nitrate and stomach cancer mortality in 24 countries. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(3):494-504. [ Links ]

64. Subar A, Patterson B. Fruit, Vegetables, and Cancer Prevention: A Review of the Epidemiological Evidence. Nutr Cancer. 1992;18(1):1-29. [ Links ]

65. Kobayashi M, Tsubono Y, Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, Tsugane S. Vegetables, fruit and risk of gastric cancer in Japan: A 10-year follow-up of the JPHC study cohort I. Int J Cancer. 2002;102(1):39-44. [ Links ]

66. Cuello C, Correa P, Haenszel W, Gordillo G, Brown C, Archer M, et al. Gastric cancer in Colombia. I. cancer risk and suspect environmental agents. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1976;57(5):1015-20. [ Links ]

67. Correa P, Haenszel W, Cuello C, Zavala D, Fontham E, Zarama G, et al. Gastric Precancerous Process in a High Risk Population: Cohort Follow-up. Cancer Res. 1990;50(15):4737-40. [ Links ]

68. Nithola C, Chamorro MCY. Factores asociados con la infección por Helicobacter Pylori en lactantes. Univ Salud. 2000;1(1):21-3. [ Links ]

69. Goodman KJ, Correa P. Transmission of Helicobacter pylori among siblings. Lancet. 2000;355(9201):358-62. [ Links ]

70. Correa P, Fontham ETH, Bravo JC, Bravo LE, Ruiz B, Zarama G, et al. Chemoprevention of gastric dysplasia: Randomized trial of antioxidant supplements and anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(23):1881-8. [ Links ]

71. Mera RM, Bravo LE, Camargo MC, Bravo JC, Delgado AG, Romero-Gallo J, et al. Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori infection as a determinant of progression of gastric precancerous lesions: 16-year follow-up of an eradication trial. Gut. 2018;7(67):1239-46. [ Links ]

72. Yépez MC, Jurado DM, Bravo LM, Bravo LE. Trends in cancer incidence, and mortality in pasto, Colombia. 15 years experience. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018;49(1):42-54. [ Links ]

73. Rugge M, Genta RM, Di Mario F, El-Omar EM, El-Serag HB, Fassan M, et al. Gastric Cancer as Preventable Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(12):1833-43. [ Links ]

74. Sugano K. Strategies for Prevention of Gastric Cancer: Progress from Mass Eradication Trials. Dig Dis. 2016;34(5):500-4. [ Links ]

75. Schneider BG, Camargo MC, Ryckman KK, Sicinschi LA, Piazuelo MB, Zabaleta J, et al. Cytokine polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk: An evolving view. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7(2):157-62. [ Links ]

76. Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Orentreich N, Vogelman H. Risk for gastric cancer in people with CagA positive or CagA negative Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut. 1997;40(3):297-301. [ Links ]

77. Kodaman N, Pazos A, Schneider BG, Blanca Piazuelo M, Mera R, Sobota RS, et al. Human and Helicobacter pylori coevolution shapes the risk of gastric disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(4):1455-60. [ Links ]

78. Aristizabal N, Cuello C, Correa P, Collazos T, Haenszel W. The impact of vaginal cytology on cervical cancer risks in Cali, Colombia. Int J Cancer. 1984;34:5-9. [ Links ]

79. Murillo R. Control del cáncer de cuello uterino en Colombia: triunfos y desafíos de la tamización basada en la citología cérvico-uterina (Editorial). Biomedica. 2008;28(4):1-4. [ Links ]

80. Muñoz N, Bosh F, de Sanjosé S, Tafur L, Izarzugaza I, Gili M, et al. The causal link between human papillomavirus and invasive cervical cancer: a population-based case-control study in Colombia and Spain. Int J Cancer. 1992;52:743-9. [ Links ]

81. Muñoz N, Bravo LE. Epidemiología del cáncer de cuello uterino en Colombia. Colomb Med (Cali). 2012;43(4):298-304. [ Links ]

82. Muñoz N, Xavier Bosch F. Cervical cancer and human papillomavirus: Epidemiological evidence and perspectives for prevention. Salud Publica Mex. 1997;39(4):274-82. [ Links ]

83. Palacios R. Considerations on immunization anxiety-related reactions in clusters. Colomb Med (Cali). 2014; 45(3):131-6. [ Links ]

84. Palencia-Sánchez F, Echeverry-Coral SJ. Social considerations affecting acceptance of HPV vaccination in Colombia. A systematic review. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2020;71(2):178-94. [ Links ]

85. Castillo A, Osorio JC, Fernández A, Méndez F, Alarcón L, Arturo G, et al. Effect of vaccination against oral HPV-16 infection in high school students in the city of Cali, Colombia. Papillomavirus Res. 2019;7(100):112-7. [ Links ]

86. Alcaldia de Santiago de Cali. Cáncer de cuello uterino Vacunación VPH- Rendición de cuentas Secretaría de Salud. Cali; 2019. [ Links ]

87. Frech S, Bravo LE, Rodriguez I, Pomata A, Aung KT, Soe AN, et al. Strengthening Pathology Capacity to Deliver Quality Cancer Care in Cities in LMICs. JCO Glob Oncol. 2021;(7):917-24. [ Links ]

88. College of American Pathologists. Cancer Case Summaries; 2018. Cited: 2021 Sep 23. Available from: https://www.cap.org/search?q=Cancer Case Summaries. [ Links ]

89. Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs. RCPAQAP. Products; 2021. Cited: 2021 Sep 23. Available from: https://rcpaqap.com.au/. [ Links ]

Notes:

Funding: This research was funded by the Universidad del Valle, and partially by the Univalle-Vandervilt University-NIH-USA (Prime Award No.2 P01 CA028842, Subaward No. VUMC3239), registered at the Universidad del Valle Information Center: 1641.

Supplementary tables

Table 1S Cali, Colombia. Age-specific and sex incidence (2013-2017) and mortality (2016-2020) rates (per 100,000 person-years). 

  Incidence Mortality
Site 15-49 50-59 60-69 70+ 15-49 50-59 60-69 70+
 
Oral cavity and pharynx 2.0 1.6 11.6 6.6 25.7 12.4 44.4 19.0 0.4 0.6 3.5 3.3 12.2 4.8 24.1 12.1
Esophagus 0.1 0.1 3.0 1.1 8.6 3.0 29.3 6.9 0.3 0.1 2.0 0.9 8.9 1.3 27.5 8.5
Stomach 5.6 5.0 38.9 17.8 75.8 35.3 198.4 96.3 3.5 2.9 28.0 13.8 53.0 25.7 161.3 76.0
Colon and rectum 5.3 4.9 31.0 29.1 71.8 59.5 188.1 133.2 2.2 2.4 12.0 13.2 40.6 26.2 123.0 94.8
Liver 0.5 0.3 5.1 4.4 28.9 12.4 61.0 51.1 0.8 0.3 6.0 5.3 26.2 13.0 73.7 50.3
Pancreas 1.0 0.6 8.8 5.9 21.5 18.0 53.7 42.0 0.9 0.8 8.2 6.5 26.7 20.0 59.6 52.9
Bronchi and lung 1.5 1.1 19.0 11.2 67.5 27.2 157.1 88.7 0.9 1.1 14.3 10.3 59.5 27.3 179.6 83.3
Skin melanoma 1.0 1.2 5.4 4.0 7.7 7.5 22.7 17.1 0.5 0.3 2.7 0.9 5.1 2.6 12.8 7.4
Breast 0.4 25.7 3.7 131.0 6.6 193.8 14.8 208.3 0.1 7.1 0.0 38.5 0.0 55.0 1.8 102.3
Cervix uteri 13.6 28.4 34.0 47.7 4.1 14.0 18.2 34.8
Corpus uteri   1.7   16.0   26.1   28.0   0.6   4.7   12.3   22.1
Ovary 3.6 15.2 22.0 35.3 1.5 10.1 21.0 37.0
Thyroid 3.2 15.4 12.1 44.0 16.6 51.1 16.2 40.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.4 2.8 4.1 5.1 11.3
Prostate 1.4   71.5   307.2   648.7   0.2 6.1 48.3 325.4
Bladder 0.5 0.2 8.4 1.1 23.7 7.9 62.4 18.2 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.6 6.1 1.9 38.4 10.5
Lymphoma 6.8 4.8 18.5 11.9 31.2 20.3 62.6 47.3 1.8 1.1 8.1 2.9 19.1 8.5 37.7 23.8
Leukemia 4.2 3.3 9.9 6.3 13.2 12.8 41.6 25.6 2.4 1.8 4.9 5.3 13.7 6.5 39.3 25.7
Other sites 23.5 15.3 77.1 69.1 161.2 119.8 348.6 249.1 7.6 5.9 37.9 31.1 91.9 62.1 281.4 184.5
All sites 57.1 98.6 324.3 403.2 867.6 663.2 1950.0 1154.2 21.6 30.9 135.8 162.8 413.9 310.6 1391.3 837.5

Rates per 100,000 persons-year

Table 2S Cali, Colombia. Age-standardized incidence rates (World population) per 100,000 person-years during the period 1962-2017  

Site Age-standardized incidence rates (World population) by period
1962-1967 1968-1977 1978-1987 1988-1997 1998-2007 2008-2017
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR
Oral cavity and pharynx 87 11.0 64 5.6 147 7.3 142 5.3 202 6.2 133 3.0 329 6.3 264 4.0 437 5.6 361 3.5 621 5.6 480 3.3
Stomach 434 56.3 267 25.9 839 43.4 618 24.4 1,141 35.3 822 19.8 1,619 31.5 1,228 18.7 2,041 26.7 1,557 14.8 2,211 19.9 1,657 10.6
Colon and rectum 57 6.6 59 5.6 136 6.5 181 6.7 289 8.5 366 8.6 603 11.6 785 11.8 1,165 14.9 1,421 13.7 1,909 17.2 2,211 14.4
Liver 33 4.1 47 4.8 40 1.9 38 1.5 83 2.4 64 1.6 155 3.0 157 2.4 278 3.7 304 3.0 553 5.2 533 3.3
Pancreas 19 2.6 38 3.6 81 4.2 73 3.0 139 4.3 163 4.1 251 5.0 267 4.1 308 4.0 385 3.7 514 4.7 582 3.7
Larynx 53 7.1 8 0.8 109 6.0 28 1.1 150 4.8 38 0.9 261 5.2 67 1.1 351 4.7 84 0.9 356 3.3 69 0.4
Bronchi and lung 127 17.6 40 4.0 306 16.2 121 4.8 748 23.6 371 9.3 1,140 23.0 613 9.6 1,561 20.7 939 9.4 1,546 14.2 1,211 7.6
Breast 2 0.2 318 27.7 2 0.1 790 28.1 7 0.2 1,447 32.8 11 0.2 2,641 39.4 31 0.4 4,933 48.9 120 1.1 6,597 45.8
Cervix uteri     837 68.9     1,604 53.8     1,768 38.5     2,187 31.2     2,502 23.7     2,090 14.5
Corpus Uteri     49 4.8     104 4.0     196 4.8     395 6.3     552 5.7     758 5.3
Ovary     99 8.1     268 8.8     347 7.8     636 9.3     929 9.2     1,010 7.0
Prostate 155 23.7     355 20.7     797 26.5     2,004 41.7     4,953 67.2     6,147 57.8    
Testis 23 1.5     45 1.3     75 1.4     162 2.1     269 2.7     323 2.6    
Bladder 67 9.1 28 2.8 160 8.6 56 2.3 245 7.7 119 2.9 354 7.1 146 2.2 594 7.8 241 2.3 628 5.7 255 1.6
Thyroid 31 3.4 76 6.3 42 1.8 176 5.5 60 1.6 297 5.8 106 1.8 511 6.6 200 2.3 1,112 10.6 449 3.9 2,154 15.3
Lymphoma 100 8.1 72 5.4 210 7.2 117 3.5 311 7.4 281 6.0 567 9.3 465 6.9 1,053 12.7 993 9.7 1,209 10.8 1,123 7.7
Leukemia 74 5.1 51 3.0 195 6.1 145 3.9 278 5.9 259 4.7 457 7.3 435 5.9 672 8.0 668 6.7 871 8.1 839 6.5
Other sites 382 42.3 408 35.9 717 31.7 1,038 37.2 1,394 38.5 1,840 42.3 2,282 41.6 2,773 41.7 3,816 48.0 4,289 42.2 4,817 43.4 5,408 36.9
All sites ¶ 1,644 198.7 2,461 213.2 3,383 163.1 5,496 193.9 5,913 174.0 8,496 192.7 10,288 196.5 13,558 201.1 17,682 229.0 21,199 207.3 22,216 203.0 26,893 183.4

Number of cases (n); Standardized incidence rate by age (ASR, by its acronym in English)

¶ All sites excluding non-melanoma skin cancer

Table 3S Cali, Colombia. Age-standardized mortality rates (World population) per 100,000 person-years during the period 1984-2020 

Site Age-standardized mortality rates (World population) by period
1984-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010 2011-2020
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR n ASR
Oral cavity and pharynx 112 3.9 43 1.2 158 2.7 106 1.4 174 2.0 140 1.2 263 2.2 231 1.3
Esophagus 104 3.8 57 1.7 195 3.5 119 1.6 185 2.1 101 0.8 225 1.9 111 0.6
Stomach 720 26.1 556 15.4 1,317 22.9 998 13.1 1,567 18.0 1,140 9.4 1,735 14.4 1,362 7.8
Colon and Rectum 149 5.3 212 5.9 442 7.5 580 7.5 715 8.2 837 6.9 1,214 10.1 1,376 7.8
Liver 179 6.3 219 6.3 331 5.7 434 5.9 525 6.1 555 4.7 682 5.7 732 4.0
Pancreas 132 4.7 163 4.6 279 4.9 323 4.4 343 3.9 418 3.5 597 5.0 730 4.1
Bronchi and lung 605 22.1 302 8.7 1,095 19.5 650 9.0 1,384 16.0 945 8.0 1,638 13.7 1,256 7.0
Melanoma and other skin 37 1.3 43 1.1 105 1.8 95 1.2 192 2.2 172 1.4 320 2.6 278 1.6
Breast 10 0.3 462 12.5 14 0.2 1,108 14.8 14 0.2 1,679 14.5 14 0.1 2,364 14.4
Cervix uteri 654 17.4 923 12.0 916 7.9 1,002 6.2
Corpus uteri     93 2.5     247 3.4     227 1.9     361 2.2
Ovary 161 4.6 359 5.0 566 4.9 705 4.3
Prostate 429 16     1,078 19.1     1,543 17.1     2,126 17.3    
Bladder 83 3.0 61 1.7 132 2.3 71 1.0 192 2.2 100 0.8 254 2.1 142 0.7
Thyroid 20 0.7 45 1.3 30 0.5 83 1.1 47 0.6 86 0.7 62 0.5 173 1.0
Lymphoma 185 5.4 139 3.7 302 4.8 258 3.4 360 4.0 324 2.8 526 4.4 412 2.4
Leukemia 194 5.2 187 4.3 399 5.7 376 4.6 489 5.3 500 4.4 555 4.6 517 3.3
Other sites** 747 24.8 820 22.8 1,582 26.2 1,649 22.1 1,994 22.6 2,245 19.2 2,810 23.3 2,913 17.2
All sites excluding non-melanoma skin cancer 3,688 128.3 4,194 115.2 7,405 126.4 8,337 110.9 9,644 109.5 10,862 92.3 12,857 106.4 14,523 85.3

Number of cases (n)

ASR: Standardized mortality rate by age (ASR, by its acronym in English)

**C17, C23, C24, C26-C32, C37-C41, C45-C49, C51, C52, C57-C60, C62-C66, C68-C80, C90, C97

Table 4S Cali, Colombia. Quality indicators of incidence information by sex during the period 2013-2017. 

Site Male Female
Cases Age Unk. MV DCO MI Cases Age Unk. MV DCO MI
(%) (%) (%) (%)
All sites except non-melanoma skin cancer C00-96 * 11,137 13 86.1 1.7 0.57 13,704 9 88.8 1.4 0.53
Oral cavity and pharynx C00-14 313 0 95.2 0.6 0.39 241 0 92.1 0.8 0.53
Esophagus C15 117 0 80.3 0.0 0.95 57 0 89.5 3.5 0.91
Stomach C16 1,074 3 84.0 1.9 0.80 820 3 82.4 3.9 0.85
Colon, rectum and anus C18-21 1,062 1 88.7 1.0 0.59 1,264 0 88.2 1.3 0.55
Liver C22 272 0 75.4 2.9 1.26 282 0 73.1 6.4 1.47
Pancreas C25 271 0 58.7 8.1 1.06 318 0 59.4 3.8 1.08
Larynx C32 149 0 95.3 0.0 0.68 28 0 82.1 0.0 0.86
Bronchi and lung C34 768 1 67.3 5.0 1.09 599 2 69.7 5.2 1.05
Skin melanoma C43 137 1 99.3 0.0 0.58 174 0 100.0 0.0 0.37
Breast C50 58   94.8 1.7 0.19 3,546 1 95.8 0.2 0.33
Cervix uteri C53 992 0 92.3 1.0 0.51
Corpus uteri C54           400 0 94.6 0.4 0.38
Ovary C56 472 0 79.5 2.5 0.74
Prostate C61 3,083 3 89.3 1.2 0.33          
Testis C62 160 0 95.6 0.0 0.16
Kidney and urinary organs NOS C64-66, 68 300 1 85.3 2.3 0.46 242 1 88.0 1.7 0.38
Bladder C67 301 0 84.7 2.7 0.41 118 0 80.5 5.1 0.69
Brain, central nervous system C70-72 295 0 85.8 2.7 0.95 268 0 78.4 3.0 1.13
Thyroid C73 234 0 97.9 0.4 0.14 1,293 0 98.1 0.2 0.06
Lymphoma C81-90, C96 804 1 98.3 0.1 0.45 738 0 98.9 0.1 0.45
Leukemia C91-95 484 0 98.4 0.0 0.56 374 1 98.1 0.0 0.66

Age Unk.: Age unknown

MV: Morphological verification

DCO: Death Certificate Only.

MI: Mortality-incidence ratio

*Excluded skin C44

Received: September 24, 2021; Revised: November 26, 2021; Accepted: December 13, 2021

Corresponding author: Luis Eduardo Bravo, Director Registro Poblacional de Cáncer de Cali, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle. Calle 4B 36-00 Edificio 116 Oficina 4009, Cali, Colombia. E-mail:luis.bravo@correounivalle.edu.co

Conflicts of interest:

None declared

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License