SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 número1Coronavirus, salud pública y mundo editorialProductividad e indicadores económicos de ensilaje de maíz dulce tratado con bacterias diazotróficas y tiamina índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista colombiana de ciencia animal recia

versión On-line ISSN 2027-4297

rev. colombiana cienc. anim. Recia vol.12 no.1 Sincelejo ene./jun. 2020  Epub 02-Jun-2021

https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v12.n1.2020.731 

Artículo original

Intake and digestibility of rations with distillery yeasts byproducts, molasses and ammoniated sugar cane tops in lambs in total confinement

Consumo y digestibilidad de raciones con levaduras de destilería, melaza y cogollo de caña amonificado en corderos confinados totalmente

Félix Primera-Campos1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-0253

Gustavo Enrique Nouel-Borges2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3746-4234

Roseliano Sánchez-Blanco3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-3307

1 Universidad Lisandro Alvarado. Facultad de Agronomía. Unidad de Investigación en Producción Animal. Estado Lara, Venezuela. felixprimera01@yahoo.com

2 Biominbloq CA, Gerencia General, Municipio Simón Planas, Estado Lara, Venezuela. genouelb@yahoo.es

3 Universidad Lisandro Alvarado. Facultad de Agronomía. Unidad de Investigación en Producción Animal. Estado Lara, Venezuela. roselianoblanco@ucla.edu.ve


ABSTRACT

Were evaluated sodium bicarbonate.-F1- and urea.-F2.- (two factors), each factor at two inclusion levels (F1 and F2: 0 and 1%), and its effect on intake and digestibility in rations with byproduct of the fermentative process of starches and / or molasses (mixture of yeast and unfermented material).-LD.-, sugarcane molasses and ammoniated sugar cane tops for lamb. Eight crossbred lamb (19.31±5.96 kg/lamb) was included in a 2x2 factorial in a 4x4 Latin square design. Treatments were combinations of LD (14% in T1, 13.8% for T2, T3 and T4) and molasses (26% in T1, 25.8% for T2, T3 and T4), with or without urea, and / or sodium bicarbonate to 1% w/u, and source of fiber were used 60 % of ammoniated sugar cane tops in all treatments. The supply of rations was gradually adjusted to 7% dry matter (DM) of body weight (28±8.66% rejection of the offer), digestibility was measured by total collection for seven days adaptation period preceded of seven day. Differences (p<0.01) for intake where intake had the highest T2 and T4 the lower (1239 vs 1066 gDM/animal/day) in the digestibility of organic matter (p<0.01) were found where T4 reached one 72% while the T2 was the lowest with 57.35%. The coefficients of digestibility of hemicelluloses, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and were different (p<0.01) and were higher in the same T1. The results showed that T4 was the best treatment, urea and sodium bicarbonate can be used effectively with agro-industrial byproducts in lambs in confinement.

Keywords: Lambs; distillery yeast; sodium bicarbonate

RESUMEN

Se evaluaron nivel de bicarbonato de sodio.- F1.- y nivel de urea.-F2.-, cada factor a dos niveles (F1 y F2: 0 y 1%) de inclusión, y su efecto sobre el consumo y digestibilidad en raciones con subproducto del proceso fermentativo de los almidones y/o de la melaza (mezcla de levaduras y material no fermentado).-LD.-, melaza y cogollo de caña para corderos. Ocho corderos mestizos (19.31±5.96 kg/animal), fueron incluidos en arreglo factorial 2x2 con diseño en cuadrado latino 4x4. Los tratamientos fueron combinación de LD (14% para T1, 13.8% para T2, T3 y T4) y melaza (26 para T1, 25.8% para T2, T3 y T4), con o sin urea y/o bicarbonato de sodio al 1% c/u., como fuente de fibra se utilizó 60% de cogollos de caña amonificado en todos los tratamientos. Oferta de raciones se ajustó gradualmente hasta 7% de MS del peso vivo (rechazo 28±8.66% de lo ofrecido), digestibilidad se determinó por colección total, durante siete días, precedidos por siete días de adaptación. Se encontraron diferencias (p<0.01) para consumo donde T2 presento mayor consumo y T4 el menor (1239 vs 1066 gMS/animal/día), la digestibilidad de la materia orgánica (p<0.01) donde T4 alcanzó 72% mientras que el T2 fue el menor con 57.35%. Los coeficientes de digestibilidad de fibra ácido detergente, fibra neutro detergente y hemicelulosa fueron diferentes (p<0.01) y los mismos fueron superiores en T1. Resultados obtenidos demostraron que T4 fue el mejor tratamiento, y el bicarbonato de sodio puede usarse eficientemente con los subproductos agroindustriales en corderos en confinamiento.

Palabras claves: Corderos; Lavaduras de destilería; bicarbonato de sodio

INTRODUCTION

The rearing of post-weaning lambs requires balanced diets capable of maintaining weight gains that facilitated attaining the weight at the time of slaughter or the first service quickly 1,2, at a competitive feeding cost and preferably using readily available resources locally 3,4. For the year 2014 in Venezuela, 102,877 hectares of sugarcane were harvested, obtaining 6,483,755 tons of cane, of which 367,000 tons of molasses were extracted 5.

Likewise, according to the same source, for the same year 2014, 232,528 sheep were slaughtered, with a yield of 16.00 kg/carcass, which generated 3,718 tons of carcass meat. From harvest sugar cane, between 411,508 and 514,385 tons of dry matter of buds can be obtained (own calculations according to data collected in Lara State, Venezuela), with an average of 89.7% of dry matter, 5.1% of ash, 3.7% crude protein, 78.2% fiber insoluble in neutral detergent, 40.7% fiber insoluble in acidic detergent and 11.54% lignin 6. When the fibrous by-products of sugar cane are dry-ammoniated (using the moisture of the fresh vegetable), it is possible to increase the availability of nitrogen in the plant material and release the components of the lignin cell wall 7,8 improving the nutritional value for ruminants, increasing the intake of dry matter and the digestibility of the cell wall 8.

Most of the sheep assets of Venezuela are located in the province of dry sub-humid to humid, which is characterized as follows: altitude 511-921 meters above sea level, average temperature between 25 and 27°C, precipitation 663-805 mm (mm), evapotranspiration 1,186- 1,274 mm, humidity deficit of 0-637 mm, dry months of 4 to 11, highly seasonal according to Andrade-Benítez 9, in the states of Lara, Falcón and Zulia 10, with strong limitations for the production of fodder throughout the year 11.

The liquor industry uses molasses and / or cereals, not suitable for human intake to make drinks such as rum, whiskeys among others, as a by-product of the fermentative process of starches and / or reducing sugars of molasses is a mixture of yeast and unfermented material of interest in animal feed, especially in sheep and lambs, whose composition on dry basis can vary from 89.1 to 94.2% of DM, 25.4 to 49% of CP, 8.9% of EE, 41.8 to 42.7% NDF, 3.95 to 5.6% of ashes 12,13,14. Due to the need to offer rations that can cover the nutritional requirements of weaned lambs, which are exploited in dry areas, it was proposed to evaluate locally available resources, such as: sugar cane harvest residues mixed with brewer's yeast, molasses, urea, and / or sodium bicarbonate to determine its effect on the intake of rations and its digestibility in lambs confined after weaning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Location. Animal Production Research Unit (UIPA), Experimental Shed in Small Ruminants, Agronomy Deanship of the Lisandro Alvarado Centroccidental University, (UCLA), Palavecino Municipality, Lara State. The average annual climatic data of the area are: temperature of 25ºC, precipitation of 812.6 mm, relative humidity of 74.6%, solar radiation of 371 cal cm-2 and evaporation of 2,084.9 mm and a height of 550 meters above sea level 15. The experiment was carried out from the month of June to the month of December.

Animals, management and treatments. Combinations of yeasts (byproduct of the fermentative process of starches and / or molasses.-mixture of yeast and unfermented material.-) of liquor factory and sugarcane molasses, with urea and / or 1% sodium bicarbonate (Table 1), in a completely random 2x2 factorial arrangement in a 4x4 Latin square design (Table 2). Two factors were evaluated: sodium bicarbonate level-F1.- and urea level-F2.-, each factor at two levels: F. in 0 and 1%; F2 at 0 and 1%) of inclusion, each treatment was a complementary part of the ration offered at a rate of 40% of the total dry matter, the other 60% of the dry matter of the ration was an ammoniated sugar cane tops.

Table 1 Composition of the Experimental Treatments Used. 

Ingredients (%) Experimental Rations
T1 T2 T3 T4
Molasses 14 13.8 13.8 13.6
Yeast 26 25.8 25.8 25.6
Urea 0 0 0.4 0.4
Sodium bicarbonate 0 0.4 0 0.4
CCA 60 60 60 60

CCA: Ammoniated sugar cane tops.

Table 2 Arrangement and Experimental Design. 

Animal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
PERIODS 1-14 T1 T1 T2 T2 T3 T3 T4 T4
15-28 T4 T4 T1 T1 T2 T2 T3 T3
29-42 T3 T3 T4 T4 T1 T1 T2 T2
43-56 T2 T2 T3 T3 T4 T4 T1 T1

Statistical model: factor I. level of sodium bicarbonate with two (2) levels, factor II: level of urea with two levels, yijk being the answers for the k-th experimental unit of level I of factor I and j of factor II

yijk = μ + Ƭi + βj + ᵞij + εijk

with i = 0, 1; j = 0, 1 and k = 1, 2, 3, 4

With the hypotheses:

H01y= 0 v i, j

H02 Ƭij i + ӯi = 0 v i

H03 βj + ӯi = 0 v j

Determining the nutritional quality of these mixtures, taking samples of forages and raw materials that were analyzed to determine dry matter, crude protein, energy and ash by the methods described by the AOAC 16 and fractions of the cell wall, as insoluble fiber in neutral detergent and acid, and hemicellulose by the methodology described by Van Soest et al 17. As well as the intake and digestibility in sheep described by Nouel-Borges et al 3, with the use of 8 young animals (2 per treatment and per period) crossbreed West African, 19.31 ± 5.96 Kg Initial Live Weight (LW), an average metabolic weight (MW, LW0.75) of 9, 58±0.14 kg during the experiment, in four experimental periods of 14 days each, with 7 days of habituation and 7 days of observation to make the measurements of intake and feces of 24 h, for a total of 56 days 3, controlling the experimental period and the animals (Table 1), determining the food intake and the apparent digestibility of the nutrients when they receive a base ration of ammoniated sugar cane tops 18. For the analysis of all the variables described, the software Statistix for Windows version 8.0 19.

The percentages that represent each one of the raw materials used for the elaboration and composition of the experimental rations are presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4. The combination of molasses and yeasts, in a proportion of 35% Molasses and 65% yeast, comes from a pre-test performed just before the experiment, where 12 combinations of molasses and yeast were tested, to achieve the best way to preserve the agro-industrial by-product, stabilizing it at a pH of 4.55 (initial of 4.62, after 6 weeks of weekly measurements, June-July) and with the minimum loss of energy in the pre-mix. The agro-industrial by-product was collected in a stainless steel tank of 10,000 liters, at the outlet temperature of 84°C, it was allowed to cool to room temperature for 24 hours, 90% of the supernatant liquid was extracted by siphons on the surface and the Tank bottom (1000 liters) was collected from a lower valve in a 250 liter plastic tank, to be processed later. Due to the acidity of the pre-mix, it is decided to propose the incorporation of sodium bicarbonate as a pH modulator in the rations evaluated.

Table 3 Composition of the Evaluated Treatments. 

Bromatological Composición Treatments
T1 T2 T3 T4
DM (%) 83.41 67.22 82.51 90.62
OM (%) 71.98 55.85 72.20 79.51
GE (Mcal/g) 3.87 3.75 3.85 3.85
CP (%) 16.48 16.35 16.14 18.73
NDF (%) 59.26 60.07 51.67 56.47
ADF (%) 40.15 41.84 37.65 39.97
Hemicell (%) 19.11 18.23 14.02 16.50

DM: Dry matter, OM: Organic matter, CP: Crude protein, GB: Gross energy, ADF: Fiber insoluble in acid detergent, NDF: Fiber insoluble in neutral detergent. Hemicell: Hemicellulose.

Table 4 Composition of raw materials. 

Bromatological Composición raw materials
Yeast Molasses CCA
DM (%) 82.63 14.74 73.5
OM (%) 62.88 66.54 68.3
GE (Mcal/g) 3.75 3.76 3.31
CP (%) 2.99 50.97 7.3
NDF (%) -- 42.74 56.9
ADF (%) -- 24.86 39.9

CCA: Ammoniated sugar cane tops.

The animals received the rations in individual pens, they had water to freedom in each pen, with cement floor and roof, and the feeders were 0.5 m long and 10 kg capacity and an area of 1.5 m2 for each animal. At the beginning of the afternoon (12:00 m), a well-known amount of ammoniated sugar cane was offered, uniformly mixed with the ration emphasizing that treatments previously dehydrated, were offered to the animals. For the dehydration process of the mixtures, a handmade coffee dryer was used, subjecting the mixtures to temperatures that oscillated between 60-80°C for a period of time of 24 hours. In the same way, the intake was measured daily by the difference between what was offered and what was rejected in the feeders at the same time of the afternoon, maintaining a 5% excess in the feeders (in order to guarantee intake to freedom), for the weighing was using an electronic scale with a capacity of 4 kg and 1 gram of appreciation. The animals were dewormed 3 months before the test (at weaning) and the dose was repeated once it was started, moxidectin was placed in a 1% solution for injection (Cydectin®), at a rate of 0.5cc / animal subcutaneously.

The sugarcane tops were chopped in a chopping machine (2.5 cm in length), then dry ammoniated, using pearl urea, at a rate of 3 Kg per 100 Kg of sugar cane tops 7,18, without adding water because the bud possessed more than 40% moisture. In order to facilitate the ammonification, the material was mixed with the urea and stored in black polyethylene bags, eliminating excess air and sealing them.

RESULTS

The highest DM intakes, cell wall components (NDF, ADF, hemicellulose) and CP reached (Table 5) were higher for T2, with the highest OM intake for T4. With an apparent digestibility of dry matter and similar energy for all treatments, greater OM digestibility for T4 and T3, greater cell wall digestibility (NDF) and hemicellulose for T, higher digestibility of ADF for T4 and T2, and a greater digestibility of the CP for T4 and T1. In general, T2 presented the highest intake with the best overall performance of fiber digestion. But the T4, with a lower intake in DM per kg of MW and a higher intake of CP, the digestion of OM was the highest, as well as that of ADF and CP, with an intermediate level of digestion of the wall cellular (NDF).

Table 5 Analysis of Variables for intake and digestibility by treatment. 

Variables Tratamientos P
T1 T2 T3 T4
DM (g) intake 1059.5b 1239.3a 1111.5ab 1065.7b 0.0145
OM (g) intake 758.81ab 696.55b 808.49ab 843.09a 0.0105
NDF (g) intake 624.72b 749.18a 578.59b 598.78b 0.0000
ADF (g) intake 423.26b 521.82a 421.60b 423.82b 0.0002
Hemicell (g) intake 201.46ab 227.36a 156.99c 174.96bc 0.0000
CP (g) intake 173.73b 203.91a 180.73ab 198.60ab 0.0228
Urea intake (g) 0.00b 0.00b 4.48a 4.24a 0.0000
Bicarbonate intake (g) 0.00b 2.84a 0.00b 2.48a 0.0000
MW intake gDM/kg0,75 118.18ab 139.08a 124.72ab 105.63b 0.0013
MW intake gCP/kg0,75 18.00b 20.69a 18.33b 20.24a 0.0000
ADDM (%) 36.98a 37.88a 34.94a 39.35a 0.4828
ADOM (%) 67.96a 57.35b 66.39a 72.00a 0.0000
DNDF (%) 30.88ab 37.11a 26.00b 30.70ab 0.0161
DADF (%) 25.62ab 31.26a 22.46b 31.74a 0.0090
DHEMICELL (%) 53.65ab 56.30a 43.35b 26.33c 0.0000
GEDIG (%) 33.06a 31.33a 30.38a 35.31a 0.3851
ADCP (%) 51.91a 42.88b 42.17b 57.15a 0.0000

MW: metabolic weight. ADDM: Apparent Digestibility of Dry Matter, ADOM: Apparent Digestibility of Organic Matter, DNDF: Digestibility of Neutral Detergent Fiber, DADF: Digestibility of Acid Detergent Fiber, DHEMICELL: Digestibility of Hemicellulose, GEDIG: Digestible Energy, ADCP: Apparent digestibility of crude protein. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (a, b and c).

When analyzing the independent effects of the factors of the arrangement, Table 6, it can be seen that for the 1% bicarbonate factor, it showed the highest values for intake of cell wall components (NDF, ADF, hemicellulose) and protein and apparent digestibility of NDF, ADF and CP; being similar 0 and 1% for intake and apparent digestibility of DM, OM and digestible energy. Urea factor at the 0% level presented the highest values for intake of cell wall components (NDF, ADF, hemicellulose) and for the apparent digestibility of NDF and hemicellulose; being the level 1% of the factor Urea superior in intake of OM and apparent digestibility of the OM and CP. There was an interaction effect between the Bicarbonate and Urea factors for DM, NDF, ADF and apparent digestibility of OM, hemicellulose and CP.

Table 6 Analysis of Variables for intake and digestibility by factors evaluated and inclusion levels. 

Variables Sodium Bicarbonate P Urea P Interacction
0% 1% 0% 1%
DM (g) intake 1085.5a 1152.5a 0.1591 1149.4a 1088.6a 0.2010 0.0082
OM (g) intake 783.65a 769.82a 0.6722 727.68b 825.79a 0.0030 0.1393
NDF(g) intake 601.66b 673.98a 0.0074 686.95a 588.69b 0.0003 0.0526
ADF(g) intake 422.43b 472.82a 0.0080 472.54a 422.71b 0.0087 0.0112
Hemicell(g) intake 179.23b 201.16a 0.0062 214.41a 165.98b 0.0000 0.6174
CP (g) intake 177.23b 201.26a 0.0028 188.82a 189.67a 0.9154 0.4402
Urea intake (g) 2.24a 2.12a 0.3285 0.00b 4.36a 0.000 0.3285
Bicarbonate intake (g) 0.00b 2.66a 0.000 1.42a 1.24a 0.4406 0.4406
MW intake g DM/kg0,75 111.37b 117.31a 0.0203 117.87a 110.81b 0.0059 0.0000
MW intake g CP/ kg0,75 18.16b 20.47a 0.0000 19.34a 19.28a 0.8905 0.3678
ADDM (%) 35.96a 38.58a 0.2019 37.40a 37.15a 0.9001 0.3853
ADOM (%) 67.18a 64.67a 0.1916 62.66b 69.20a 0.0007 0.0000
DNDF (%) 28.44b 33.91a 0.0215 34.00a 28.35b 0.0176 0.7442
DADF (%) 24.04b 31.50a 0.0011 28.44a 27.10a 0.5493 0.4188
DHEMICELL (%) 48.50a 41.32b 0.0188 54.97a 34.84b 0.0000 0.0014
GEDIG (%) 31.72a 33.32a 0.4582 32.19a 32.84a 0.7642 0.1250
ADCP(%) 47.04a 50.01a 0.1189 47.39a 49.66a 0.2342 0.0000

MW: metabolic weight. ADDM: Apparent Digestibility of Dry Matter, ADOM: Apparent Digestibility of Organic Matter, DNDF: Digestibility of Neutral Detergent Fiber, DADF: Digestibility of Acid Detergent Fiber, DHEMICELL: Digestibility of Hemicellulose, GEDIG: Digestible Energy, ADCP: Apparent digestibility of crude protein. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (a, b and c).

Table 7 shows the results based on eight observations per treatment and expressed every 14 days that was the time of change between each treatment of the arrangement, where clearly the best weight gain was that of T4, followed by T1 and the worst T2 and T3, the daily intake of DM was higher for T2 and T3 (Table 5), although no differences were detected when globalizing it every 14 days, to make it related to the weight gain in the same period and obtain the conversion. But it gives a very approximate idea to confirm that the best conversion can be that of T4.

Table 7 Analysis of Variables for weight gain, intake and conversion by Evaluated Factors and inclusion levels. 

Variables Sodium Bicarbonate Urea P Interacción
0% 1% 0% 1%
T1 T3 T2 T4
Daily weight gain (kg) 0.084ab 0.053b 0.088ab 0.131a 0.0837
Weight gain 14 d (g) 1.356ab 0.875b 1.225b 1.969a 0.0193
DM Intake 14 d (kg) 14.37 14.73 16.31 14.25 0.4900
Conversion kg DM / kg live weight gain 16.96 19.14 14.47 10.07 0.3502

Different letters in the same row show different means by the LSD test (p <0.05).

DISCUSSION

López-Yáñez et al 20 Pelibuey (West African) male lambs with an average live weight (LW) of 18.3±1.21 kg confined by consuming rations with dry distiller>s grain 30.0%, corn ground grain 51.5%, sugar cane molasses 15.0%, Premix mineral-protein 3.5% Dry matter 95.5%, Raw protein 16.7%, Nitrogen free extract 36.2%, Ethereal extract 4.0%, NDF 35, 3%, ADF 14.4%, Ashes 5.2%, achieving a DM intake of 1.120 g/day with an estimated DM degradability of 46.9%, the intake being similar to this experiment and the degradability higher than the apparent digestibility. Bonilla-Cárdenas et al 21 in Pelibuey sheep of 40 kg of average body weight, confined by consuming rations with 60.7% of corn stubble, 24.6% of dried distillers grains with solubles, 10.6% of canola, 2.1% molasses and 1.1% calcium carbonate, whose composition was 87.2% DM, 89.6% OM, 10.4% ash, 15% CP, 53.9% NDF, 30.2% % ADF and 21.8% of hemicellulose achieved intakes of 860.2 g of DM, 770.6 g of OM, 129.3 g of CP, 518 gr of NDF, 330 g of ADF and 188 g of hemicellulose per animal per day, with apparent digestibility of 67.6% DM, 47.5% OM, 63.5% CP, 34.4% NDF, 18.4% ADF and 62.4% for hemicellulose; the results of this experiment were superior in intake for most of the treatments and components analyzed, as well as for the digestibility of the OM, NDF and ADF, and lower for the digestibility of the DM, CP and hemicellulose.

Castro-Pérez et al 12 using Katahdin male lambs weighing 25.9±2.9 kg, receiving rations with dry rolled corn 44.5 to 54.5%, dry distillers grains with solubles 20 to 30%, soy cake 5%, Sudan grass hay 10%, tallow 1.5 and molasses 6.1% whose final composition was CP 13.98 to 15.51%, EE 5.38 to 5.95% NDF 22.55 to 26%, 12% and GE 18.32 to 18.41 MJ / kg and with a DM intake of 684 to 689 g/d, of OM of 639 to 646 g/d and NDF of 154 to 180 g/d and digestibility of the DM from 76.7 to 74.9%, from OM 79.3 to 77.3% and from the NDF from 57.1 to 59.2%; reaching lower values of fiber intake and much higher digestibility of the same, being relatively similar in the apparent digestibility of OM, both experiences. Despite having similar levels of distillery grains, the rations of Castro-Pérez et al 12 were much more concentrated in easily degradable energy (non-structural carbohydrates) and less fibrous, which would explain their greater digestion.

Curzaynz et al 22 formulated a base diet with 15% forage (stubble of ground corn) and 85% concentrate (corn, 47.3%, soybean paste, 12.8%, wheat bran, 7%, gluten of corn, 7%, molasses, 6%, fat surpassing 2.4%, calcium carbonate, 1.0%, minerals 1.0% and salt 0.5%), containing 18.5% CP, in the which included dried distiller grains with soluble in 20 and 40%, partially replacing corn, soybean paste and corn gluten to maintain iso-nitrogenated experimental diets, which were offered to whole Creole lambs of 24 ± 2.41 kg LW reaching intakes of 1261 to 1281 g/animal/d and apparent digestibility of the DM of 75.3 1 70.1%, NDF of 49.5 to 45.1% and ADF of 44.8 to 40.4% for the rations of 20 and 40% of distillery grains, the results of them exceed intakes and digestibility to all treatments and are similar in intake to T2, something similar to the previous comparison where a ration was evaluated Highly concentrated and relatively low in fiber.

Miccoli et al 23 using sheep with ruminal fistula (70.0 ± 7.13 kg of LW), using as treatments: dried distillers grains with solubles (DM 75.4%, PB 27.3%, NDF 46.8%; ADF 12.3%; EE 12.3%); Soybean Expeller (DM 97.0%, PB 40.4%, FDN 20.2%, ADF 7.0%, EE 12.31%); sunflower pellet (PG) (DM 96.3%, PB 36.6%, NDF 31.0%, ADF 18.0%, EE 6.7%) and pasture hay (HP) (DM 96.4% PB 7.0%, NDF 70.4%, ADF 36.8%, EE 1.5%) as basal diet; digestion was 47.4% of the DM, 51.4% of the OM, 47.1% of the NDF and 32.3% of the ADF, when the supplementation represented 52g of DM for each kg of pv0.75 and that of hay of 51g of DM for each kg of PV0.75; being a lower performance both in metabolic weight intake and in digestibility with respect to T and T4 of this experiment, probably due to the positive effect of molasses as a source of non-structural carbohydrates of2easy degradation and digestion.

Arcos-García et al 24 evaluating Suffolk Sheep, weighing 30kg, that received a consistent base ration, on a dry basis, of sugar cane core (50%), sorghum grain (21%), wheat bran (15%) , molasses (12%) and urea (2%), having the following composition: 90.23% DM; 92.37% of OM; 11.47% CP; 62.57% of NDF; and 28.45% of ADF, to which Saccharomyces cerevisiae was added or not as a complement, reaching a dry matter intake of 1401 g/d, a digestibility of DM 79.3%; OM 89.1%; NDF 32.1%; and ADF of 18.6%, achieving better performance in the digestion of the DM and OM, similar in the NDF and lower in the ADF than in this trial, with similar rations in the structural carbohydrate content of the cell wall.

Aguirre et al 25 evaluated the animal response using male lambs, Pelibuey breed, weaned with average live weight of 20.24 ± 3.17 kg confined with selected diets based on the whole milled sugar cane (ammoniated and enriched with zeolite) at 50% of the ration and the other 50% was a mixture of whole corn flour and soybean cake, for a 13.25% of CP and 59.1% of NDF and 37.7% of ADF, achieved an individual intake of 1.405 g of DM/animal/d, with weight gain of 106.5 g LW/animal/d, being lower in weight gain and higher in DM intake at T4 of this experiment, which is of interest since there is no corn and soy in the ration. Although Aguirre et al 25, have an experience using sugar cane harvest residues and sugar cane silage without ammonification (to 50% of the ration) also with soybean cake and corn integral flour with 10.9% of CP and 59.9 5 of NDF, where achieved intake of 1,350 g DM / animal / d and 130.7 g LW / animal / d being similar in weight gain to T4, but higher in the intake, which means less conversion, with the same incorporation of soybean cake and corn.

Pedraza et al 26 evaluating Pelibuey sheep of 14.2 kg of LW, fed with "B" cane molasses and Digitaria decumbens hay sprayed with a solution of a urea-molasses mixture offered ad libitum, receiving as a supplement three levels of inclusion of saccharina (40 to 60%), sugar cane (10 to 20%) and brown sugar sweeping (17%), reached weight gains of 81 to 127 g LW / animal / day, the best treatment being the one 40% saccharin, 18% sunflower meal, 17% brown sugar sweep, with a conversion of 10.9 kg DM / kg of LW gained, being similar in weight gain to T4, with a slightly higher conversion, despite to have used molasses, 117 g DM / animal / day of molasses, sweeping sugar and sunflower cake, whose nutritional value is high.

Rivas-Jacobo et al 27 evaluated the supplementation with humid brewery bagasse (BHC) in substitution of a grain of corn and sorghum in the productivity of Rambouillet sheep of 25.5 kg of LW grazing on crop residues (Zea mays L. and Avena sativa L.) receiving 500 g of DM from BHC as a supplement reached weight gains of 138.8 g / animal / d, values similar to those found in this experiment.

Obeidat 28 evaluated Awassi lambs of 24.9±1.93 kg LW, to which they were offered a completely mixed ration of barley grain, soybean cake and 15% dried distillers grains with solubles, consuming 1,059 g DM / animal / d and achieving live weight gain of 212 g / animal / d and a conversion of 5.03 kg of DM / kg of LW gained, much higher than T4.

Obeidat et al 29 was to evaluate the effect of feeding low (LO)- or high (HI)-fiber diets supplemented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (0.25 gr/day/lamb), Awassi female lambs (6 months old) were used, diet HI was 13.8% CP, 52% NDF, 21.9%

ADF; the DM and CP intake were 1143 g/d and 158 g/d; digestibility were: DM 66%, CP 70.2%, NDF 59.8% and ADF 60.9%. This experience had a similar performance in the DM intake and higher in all the digestible fractions evaluated than the one achieved here, this was surely marked by a soybean and barley grain content of 43% and only 43% of wheat straw.

The possibility of supplementing ammoniated forage with molasses and distillery grains to an ammoniated forage, significantly improves the weight gains in lambs, because Rodríguez-Prado and Ventura 2 in crossbred West African lambs receiving ammoniated hay from Brachiaria humidicola could only achieve weight gains of 27 g LW/animal/d.

The higher intake of sodium bicarbonate and urea in the ration of T4 (Table 5) allowed a higher intake of raw protein and organic atter; likewise, a greater apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, NDF and ADF in said treatment was achieved; This resulted in greater weight gain in such treatment. These achievements are based on the possibility of having a higher pH, close to neutrality (6.2 to 6.7), and a longer retention time of ammonia in the ruminal liquor without being absorbed by the ruminal wall, allowing a greater Synthesis of microbial protein and lower loss of energy in urea synthesis for urinary removal, evidenced by the lower intake of dry matter of T4 and the higher intake of crude protein, of which almost a third or more was non-protein nitrogen (urea and ammoniated forage), as supported by the findings of Lu et al 30; Sartre et al 31; Hsu et al 32; Xu et al 33 and Phillip 34.

In conclusion, low-value local resources for the nutrition of human and non-ruminants, such as sugarcane harvest byproducts of and the liquor industry by-products in the feeding of weaned lambs, using of sodium bicarbonate and urea as improvers of ruminal function. Production tests must be carried out on a larger scale to determine the economic value of the evaluated practice.

Acknowledgments

To the CDCHT of the Lisandro Alvarado University for partially financing the present investigation with the Project 534-AG-2007 and Mr. Orlando Alvarado Polanco for his support and partial funding of the investigation.

REFERENCES

1. Freer M, Dove H. Sheep Nutrition. CAB International, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK; 2002. URL: https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/44883421Links ]

2. Rodríguez-Prado M, Ventura M. Suplementación con melaza y harina de maíz en corderos alimentados con heno amonificado. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 2009; 17(1-2):31-35. URL: http://www.bioline.org.br/pdf7la09005. [ Links ]

3. Nouel-Borges G, Hevia Opazo P, Velásquez M, Espejo Días M, Rojas J, Sánchez R. Efecto de cama de pollos, subproductos de cereales y caña sobre la fisiología ruminal de ovinos. Archivos de Zootecnia. 2011; 60(229):19-30. URL: http://www.uco.es/organiza/servicios/publica/az/php/img/web/09102303EfectoBorges.pdf. [ Links ]

4. Nouel-Borges G, Hevia-Opazo P, Sánchez-Blanco R, Rojas-Castellanos J, Velásquez M. Producción de corderos alimentados con raciones de bagazo de caña amonificado, subproductos de maíz y cama de pollos, confinados hasta el sacrificio. Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ. 2013; 23(6):520-530. URL: http://www.fcv.luz.edu.ve/index.php?option=comcontent&task=view&id=567&Itemid=186. [ Links ]

5. FAOSTAT. FAO. Sugar cane production, yield and area harvested in Venezuela year 2014 (On line). Fao; 2019. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. [ Links ]

6. Galina MA, Ruiz G, Ortiz MA. Ceba de bovinos con punta de caña y planta de maíz suplementados con bloque proteico de urea o concentrado. Pastos y Forrajes. 2002; 25(3):1-12. URL: https://payfo.ihatuey.cu/index.php?journal=pasto&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=869. [ Links ]

7. Hernández A, Mujica A. Optimización del proceso de amonificación en seco y valor nutritivo del bagacillo de caña en ovinos. Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre. Barquisimeto: Venezuela; 2003. URL: http://bibagr.ucla.edu.ve/cgi-win/bealex.exe7Acceso=T070500043174/0&Nombrebd=bvetucla&Destacar=antonio;hernandez. [ Links ]

8. Kebede G, Mengistu A, Assefa G, Animut G. Nutritional and fermentative quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) top ensiled with or without urea and molasses. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2018; 13(20):1010-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2017.12888. [ Links ]

9. Andrade-Benítez OC. Demarcaciones climáticas del municipio Torres en el estado Lara, Venezuela. Agronomía Trop. 2012; 62(1-4):97-110. URL: http://www.sian.inia.gob.ve/revistasci/Agronomia%20Tropical/at621-4/pdf/at6214andrade o.pdf. [ Links ]

10. MPPAT (Ministerio del poder popular para la Agricultura y Tierras). VII censo agrícola nacional (mayo 2007 / abril 2008) Procesado con Redatam+SP CEPAL/CELADE. 2008. URL: http://censo.mat.gob.ve/. [ Links ]

11. Nouel-Borges G, Rincón-González J. Potencial forrajero de especies arbóreas en el bosque seco tropical #12. En: Manual de Ganadería Doble Propósito. González-Stagnaro C, Soto-Belloso E. (ed). Ediciones Astro Data, S.A: Maracaibo, Venezuela; 2005. URL http://www.avpa.ula.ve/docuPDFs/libros online/manual-ganaderia/seccion3/articulo12-s3.pdf. [ Links ]

12. Castro-Pérez BI, Garzón-Proaño JS, López-Soto MA, Barreras A, González VM, Plascencia A, et al. Effects of replacing dry-rolled corn with increasing levels of corn dried distillers grains with solubles on characteristics of digestion, microbial protein synthesis and digestible energy of diet in hair lambs fed high-concentrate diets. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 2013; 26(8):1152-1159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13054. [ Links ]

13. Todorov N, Simeonov M, Kirilov A. Feeding early-weaned lambs with pelleted dry distillers grain with solubles (DDGS) plus whole grain, and two methods of supplyng minerals and vitamins. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013; 19(4):810-816. URL: https://www.agrojournal.org/19/04-30.pdf. [ Links ]

14. Whitney TR, Braden KW. Substituting corn dried distillers grains for cottonseed meal in lamb finishing diets: carcass characteristics, meat fatty acid profiles, and sensory panel traits. Sheep & Goat Research Journal 2010; 25:49-56. http://d1cqrq366w3ike.cloudfront.net/http/DOCUMENT/SheepUSA/Substituting-Corn-Dried-Distillers-Grains-Cottonseed-Meal.pdf. [ Links ]

15. Ortiz JN, Miranda H, Peroza D. Uniformidad y pérdidas por evaporación y arrastre en riego por aspersión en Tarabana, estado Lara. Revista Unellez de Ciencia y Tecnología 2015; 33:53-61. http://revistas.unellez.edu.ve/index.php/ruct/article/download/246/234. [ Links ]

16. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 14th ed., Association of official agricultural chemist. Washington, DC.; 1984. [ Links ]

17. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74:3583-359. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2. [ Links ]

18. Preston T. Tropical Animal Feeding. Animal Production And Health Paper # 126. FAO: Roma; 1995. http://www.fao.org/3/V9327E/V9327E00.htm. [ Links ]

19. Analytical Software®. Statistix for Windows Version 8.0. 2105 Miller Landing Rd Tallahassee, FL 32312 USA: Analytical Software; 2007. [ Links ]

20. López-Yáñez BA, Pinos-Rodríguez JM, Devezé-Murillo P, Espin T, Pérez-Hernández P. Efecto de la substitución de maíz por cormo de malanga (Colocasia esculenta) en la degradación in vitro de dietas y en el desarrollo de corderos Pelibuey. Agrociencia. 2018; 52:97-105. https://www.colpos.mx/agrocien/Bimestral/2018/dic-especial/art-11.pdf. [ Links ]

21. Bonilla-Cárdenas JA, Lemus-Flores C, Montaño-Gómez MF, González-Vizcarra VM, Ly-Carmenatti J. Fermentación ruminal, digestibilidad y producción de metano en ovinos alimentados con cuatro niveles de rastrojo de maíz. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 2012; 15:499-509. www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/download/1446/760. [ Links ]

22. Curzaynz, KR, Bárcena JR, Hernández D, Herrera JG, Crosby MM, Sánchez C, Meneses M. Efecto de los granos secos de destilería en dietas iso-nitrogenadas en el comportamiento productivo, variables ruminales, digestibilidad y características de la canal en corderos. Reunión Nacional de Innovación Acuícola y Pesquera. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP): México D.F; 2014 http://reunionesnacionales.inifap.gob.mx/RNIP/MEMORIAS/2014.pdf. [ Links ]

23. Miccoli F, Villanueva Pedraza E, Jaurena G, Wawrzkiewicz M, Iorio JD, Cantet JM, Palladino RA. NA1 Consumo y digestión de heno de forraje de baja calidad en ovinos suplementados con granos de destilería de maíz. Revista Argentina de Producción Animal 2015; Supl.1:259. http://ppct.caicyt.gov.ar/index.php/rapa/article/view/7177/pdf. [ Links ]

24. Arcos-García JL, Castrejón FA, Mendoza GD, Pérez-Gavilan EP. Effect of two commercial yeast cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal fermentation and digestion in sheep fed sugar cane tops. Livestock Production Science. 2000; 63(2):153-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00116-5. [ Links ]

25. Aguirre J, Magaña R, Martínez S, Gómez A, Ramírez JC, Barajas R, Plascencia A, Bárcena R, García DE. Caracterización nutricional y uso de la caña de azúcar y residuos transformados en dietas para ovinos. Zootecnia Tropical. 2010; 28(4):489-497. http://ve.scielo.org/pdf/zt/v28n4/art05.pdf. [ Links ]

26. Pedraza RM, Mauriño C, Gómez JE, Valdés V, Chaviano A. Alimentación post-destete de ovinos pelibuey con miel "B", heno y mezclas basadas en derivados de la caña de azúcar. Livestock Research for Rural Development 1995; 7(2): Article #12. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd7/2/10.htm. [ Links ]

27. Rivas-Jacobo M, Herrera-Medina R, Santos-Díaz R, Herrera-Corredor A, Escalera-Valente F, Martínez-González S. Bagazo húmedo de cervecería como sustituto de cereales en la suplementación de ovinos. Abanico Veterinario. 2017; 7(3):21-29. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/av/v7n3/2448-6132-av-7-03-00021.pdf. [ Links ]

28. Obeidat BS. Influence of corn-dried distiller's grain with solubles on growth performance and blood metabolites of Awassi lambs offered a concentrate diet. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2018; 17(3):636-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1404946. [ Links ]

29. Obeidat BS, Mahmoud KZ, Obeidat MD, Ata M, Kridli RT, Haddad SG, Titi HH, Jawasreh KI, Altamimi HJ, Subih HS, Hatamleh SM, Ishmais MAA, Affan RA The effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on intake, nutrient digestibility, and rumen fluid pH in Awassi female lambs. Veterinary World. 2018; 11(7):1015-1020. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1015-1020. [ Links ]

30. Lu Z, Stumpff F, Deiner C, Rosendahl J, Braun H, Abdoun K, Aschenbach JR, Martens H. Modulation of sheep ruminal urea transport by ammonia and pH. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014; 307:R558-R570. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00107.2014. [ Links ]

31. Santra A, Chaturvedi OH, Tripathi MK, Kumar R, Karim SA. Effect of dietary sodium bicarbonate supplementation on fermentation characteristics and ciliate protozoal population in rumen of lambs. Small Ruminant Research. 2003; 47:203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00241-9. [ Links ]

32. Hsu JT, Fahey Jr. GC, Clark JH, Berger LL, Merchen NR. Effects of urea and sodium bicarbonate supplementation of a high-fiber diet on nutrient digestion and ruminal characteristics of defaunated sheep. J Anim. Sci. 1991; 69(3):1300-1311. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6931300x. [ Links ]

33. Xu Y, Li Z, Moraes LE, Shen J, Yu Z, Zhu W. Effects of Incremental Urea Supplementation on Rumen Fermentation, Nutrient Digestion, Plasma Metabolites, and Growth Performance in Fattening Lambs. Animals. 2019; 9:652-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090652. [ Links ]

34. Phillip Le. Effect of sodium bicarbonate on nitrogen utilization and feed intake by lambs. Can J Anim Sci. 1983; 63:613-621. https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.4141/cjas83-069. [ Links ]

Como citar (Vancouver). Primera-Campos F, Nouel-Borges GE, Sánchez-Blanco R. Intake and digestibility of rations with distillery yeasts byproducts, molasses and ammoniated sugar cane tops in lambs in total confinement. Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim. Recia. 2020; 12(1):e731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v12.n1.2020.731

Conflict of interest We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Received: July 29, 2019; Accepted: December 30, 2019

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License