<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-0062</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ideas y Valores]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ideas y Valores]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-0062</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Filosofía.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-00622020000300059</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/ideasyvalores.v69n174.70352</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[SOBRE CONCEPTOS Y ENTIDADES SINGULARES EN LA CIENCIA DE LA LÓGICA DE HEGEL UN APORTE DESDE LA "LÓGICA SUBJETIVA"]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[ABOUT CONCEPTS AND SINGULAR ENTITIES IN HEGEL'S SCIENCE OF LOGIC A CONTRIBUTION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE SUBJECTIVE LOGIC]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HERSZENBAUN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MIGUEL ALEJANDRO]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Buenos Aires  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>174</numero>
<fpage>59</fpage>
<lpage>76</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-00622020000300059&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-00622020000300059&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-00622020000300059&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN En la comparación entre lógica trascendental y lógica especulativa surge la pregunta por cómo entender el proyecto lógico de Hegel, en relación con la deducción metafísica y la deducción trascendental de las categorías. En el presente trabajo, me propongo demostrar que la articulación entre lógica objetiva y lógica subjetiva exige entender que el proyecto lógico de Hegel debe tener, como una de sus metas, la efectiva constitución puramente conceptual de entidades singulares, superando los fines perseguidos tanto por una deducción metafísica como por una deducción trascendental.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT While comparing Transcendental Logic with Speculative Logic emerges the question about how to understand Hegel's logical project concerning the metaphysical deduction and the transcendental deduction. In this paper, I intend to prove that the articulation between Objective Logic and Subjective Logic requires understanding that Hegel's logical project must include, as one of its goals, the effective constitution of singular entities by purely conceptual means. In this way, Hegel's project surpasses the goals of both a metaphysical and transcendental deduction.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Hegel]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[concepto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[lógica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[objeto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[singular]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Hegel]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[concept]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[logic]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[object]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[singular]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arndt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Die Subjektivitàt des Begriffs]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hgg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andreas Arndt]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kruck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Günter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegels Lehre vom Begriff, Urteil und Schluss]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>11-23</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akademie Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Boer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Dissolving Force of the Concept: Hegel's Ontological Logic]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Review of Metaphysics]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>787-822</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Boer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[On Hegel. The Sway of the Negative]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hampshire ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Palgrave Macmillan]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Düsing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Constitution and Structure of Self-Identity: Kant's Theory of Apperception and Hegel's Criticism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Midwest Studies in Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>409-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mondolfo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rodolfo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ciencia de la lógica]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ediciones Solar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Phünomenologie des Geistes]]></source>
<year>1807</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hamburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Wissenschaft der Logik. Die Lehre vom Wesen]]></source>
<year>1813</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hamburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Wissenschaft der Logik. Die Lehre vom Begriff]]></source>
<year>1816</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hamburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Wissenschaft der Logik. Die Lehre vom Sein]]></source>
<year>1832</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hamburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Antonio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fenomenología del espíritu]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Abada; UAM Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. W. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Wie der gemeine Menschenverstand die Philosophie nehme, dargestellt an den Werken des Herrn Krug]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Jenaer Schriften 1801-1807]]></source>
<year>1802</year>
<page-range>188-207</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Frankfurt am Main ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Suhrkamp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoffmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maureira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Max]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wrehde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Klaus]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegel. Una propedéutica]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Biblos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Houlgate]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hegel's Critique of Kant."]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>89</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>21-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Zum erkenntnistheoretischen Programm der Schlusslehre Hegels]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hgg]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kruck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Günter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegels Lehre vom Begriff, Urteil und Schluss]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>119-36</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akademie Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year>1902</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[de Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mario]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón pura]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Colihue]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Die Problematik des Übergangs von der Schlusslehre zur Objektivitát]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arndt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andreas]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kruck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Günter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegels Lehre von Begriff, Urteil und Schluss]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>205-16</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akademie Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Longuenesse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicole J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinkard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegel's Dialectic. The Explanation of Possibility]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Philadelphia ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Temple University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pippin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegel's Idealism. The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hegels Schlusslehre als Theorie des Begriffs]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arndt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andreas]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kruck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Günter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegels Lehre vom Begriff, Urteil und Schluss]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>216-32</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akademie Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taylor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegel]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Utz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Alles Vernünftige ist ein Schlufi. Zur Bedeutung der Hegelschen Schlusslehre für das spekulative Denken]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arndt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andreas]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kruck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Günter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hegels Lehre vom Begriff, Urteil und Schluss]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>181-204</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akademie Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
