<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-0488</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Colombiana de Entomología]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Colomb. Entomol.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-0488</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Colombiana de Entomología]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-04882010000200003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Selectivity of growth regulators and neonicotinoids for adults of Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La Selectividad de los reguladores de crecimiento y neonicotinoides para los adultos de Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ANDRADE CARVALHO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GERALDO]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SEKIGUCHI GODOY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MAURÍCIO]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SILVA PARREIRA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DOUGLAS]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LASMAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OLINTO]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SOUZA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JANDER]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FONSECA MOSCARDINI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VALERIA]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>195</fpage>
<lpage>201</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-04882010000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-04882010000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-04882010000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to evaluate the residual and sublethal effects of the insecticides acetamiprid (0.05 g a.i./L), lufenuron (0.04 g a.i./L), imidacloprid (0.14 g a.i./L), novaluron (0.02 g a.i./L), triflumuron (0.14 g a.i./L), and pyriproxifen (0.1 g a.i./L) on adults from the maternal generation of Trichogramma pretiosum, as well as their subsequent effects on the F1 and F2 generations. Eggs of Anagasta kuehniella were glued to paper cards, UV-killed, and dip-treated in insecticide solutions. Next, the eggs were exposed for parasitism 1, 24, and 48 h after treatment, maintained that way for 24 h under controlled conditions (24 ± 2°C, 70 ± 10% relative humidity, 12-h photophase), until the emergence of the parasitoids. The insecticide toxicity was calculated based on the longevity and parasitism capacity of the maternal generation, as well as on the emergence rate, sex ratio, longevity, and parasitism capacity of the F1 and F2 generations. The insecticides were toxicologically classified according to IOBC. Pyriproxifen was slightly harmful (class 2) for the parasitism capacity of T. pretiosum maternal and F1 generation females. Novaluron was slightly harmful for the emergence rate of the F1 generation. Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, lufenuron, and triflumuron were harmless (class 1) to T. pretiosum.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se evaluaron los efectos residuales y subletales de insecticidas acetamiprid (0,05 g i.a./L), lufenurón (0,04 g i.a./L), imidacloprid (0,14 g i.a./L), novaluron (0,02 g i.a./L), triflumurón (0,14 g i.a./L) y piriproxifen (0,1 g i.a. L) en la generación parental de adultos de Trichogramma pretiosum, tanto como sus efectos posteriores sobre las generaciones F1 y F2. Huevos de Anagasta kuehniella adheridos con goma árabe a cuadros de cartón fueron sacrificados con luz UV y tratados por inmersión en las soluciones de insecticida. Luego, se expusieron al parasitismo 1, 24 y 48 horas después del tratamiento durante 24 horas bajo condiciones controladas (24 ± 2°C, humedad relativa 70 ± 10%, 12-h fotofase) hasta la emergencia de los parasitoides. Se calculó la toxicidad de los insecticidas basados en la longevidad y la capacidad de parasitismo de las hembras de la generación materna, así como en la tasa de emergencia, la proporción de sexos, la longevidad y la capacidad de parasitismo de las generaciones F1 y F2. Los compuestos se clasificaron según la IOBC. Piriproxifen fue levemente perjudicial (clase 2) para la capacidad de parasitismo de las hembras maternales y la generación F1 de T. pretiosum. Novaluron fue levemente perjudicial para la emergencia de la generación F1. Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, lufenurón y triflumurón fueron inocuos (clase 1).]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Solanaceae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Egg parasitoids]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pesticides]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Side-effects]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Solanaceae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Parasitoides de huevos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Pesticidas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Efectos colaterales]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="Verdana" size="2"></font>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><font size="4" face="Verdana"><b>Selectivity of growth regulators and neonicotinoids for adults   of <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i> (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)</b></font></p>     <p align="center"><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  La Selectividad de los reguladores de crecimiento y neonicotinoides para los adultos de <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i>   (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p><b> GERALDO ANDRADE CARVALHO<sup>1*</sup>, MAUR&Iacute;CIO SEKIGUCHI GODOY<sup>1,2</sup> , DOUGLAS SILVA PARREIRA<sup>1,3</sup>,   OLINTO LASMAR<sup>1,4</sup>, JANDER RODRIGUES SOUZA<sup>1,5</sup> and VALERIA FONSECA MOSCARDINI<sup>1,6</sup></b></p>     <p><sup>1</sup> Selectivity of pesticides for natural enemies. Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Departamento de Entomologia, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil, C.P. 3037, CEP: 37200-000. * Prof. Dr. in Entomology, <a href="mailto:gacarval@den.ufla.br.">gacarval@den.ufla.br.</a> Corresponding Author. </p>     <p><sup>2</sup> P&oacute;s Dr. in Entomology.</p>     <p> <sup>3</sup> M. Sc. in Entomology. </p>     <p><sup>4,5,6</sup> M. Sc.   students in Agronomy / Entomology. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> Recibido: 21-oct-2009 &bull; Aceptado: 30-may-2010</p> <hr /> </font>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Abstract: </font></b>The objective of this study was to evaluate the residual and sublethal effects of the insecticides acetamiprid   (0.05 g a.i./L), lufenuron (0.04 g a.i./L), imidacloprid (0.14 g a.i./L), novaluron (0.02 g a.i./L), triflumuron (0.14 g   a.i./L), and pyriproxifen (0.1 g a.i./L) on adults from the maternal generation of <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i>, as well as   their subsequent effects on the F<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub> generations. Eggs of <i>Anagasta kuehniella</i> were glued to paper cards, UV-killed,   and dip-treated in insecticide solutions. Next, the eggs were exposed for parasitism 1, 24, and 48 h after treatment,   maintained that way for 24 h under controlled conditions (24 &plusmn; 2&deg;C, 70 &plusmn; 10% relative humidity, 12-h photophase), until   the emergence of the parasitoids. The insecticide toxicity was calculated based on the longevity and parasitism capacity   of the maternal generation, as well as on the emergence rate, sex ratio, longevity, and parasitism capacity of the F<sub>1</sub> and   F<sub>2</sub> generations. The insecticides were toxicologically classified according to IOBC. Pyriproxifen was slightly harmful   (class 2) for the parasitism capacity of <i>T. pretiosum</i> maternal and F<sub>1</sub> generation females. Novaluron was slightly harmful   for the emergence rate of the F<sub>1</sub> generation. Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, lufenuron, and triflumuron were harmless (class 1) to <i>T. pretiosum</i>.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"></font>     <p>  <font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Key words: </font></b>Solanaceae. Egg parasitoids. Pesticides. Side-effects.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> <hr /> </font>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b> <font size="3">Resumen: </font></b>Se evaluaron los efectos residuales y subletales de insecticidas acetamiprid (0,05 g i.a./L), lufenur&oacute;n (0,04 g   i.a./L), imidacloprid (0,14 g i.a./L), novaluron (0,02 g i.a./L), triflumur&oacute;n (0,14 g i.a./L) y piriproxifen (0,1 g i.a. L) en la   generaci&oacute;n parental de adultos de <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i>, tanto como sus efectos posteriores sobre las generaciones   F<sub>1</sub> y F<sub>2</sub>. Huevos de <i>Anagasta kuehniella</i> adheridos con goma &aacute;rabe a cuadros de cart&oacute;n fueron sacrificados con luz UV y   tratados por inmersi&oacute;n en las soluciones de insecticida. Luego, se expusieron al parasitismo 1, 24 y 48 horas despu&eacute;s del   tratamiento durante 24 horas bajo condiciones controladas (24 &plusmn; 2&deg;C, humedad relativa 70 &plusmn; 10%, 12-h fotofase) hasta   la emergencia de los parasitoides. Se calcul&oacute; la toxicidad de los insecticidas basados en la longevidad y la capacidad   de parasitismo de las hembras de la generaci&oacute;n materna, as&iacute; como en la tasa de emergencia, la proporci&oacute;n de sexos, la   longevidad y la capacidad de parasitismo de las generaciones F<sub>1</sub> y F<sub>2</sub>. Los compuestos se clasificaron seg&uacute;n la IOBC.   Piriproxifen fue levemente perjudicial (clase 2) para la capacidad de parasitismo de las hembras maternales y la generaci&oacute;n   F<sub>1</sub> de <i>T. pretiosum</i>. Novaluron fue levemente perjudicial para la emergencia de la generaci&oacute;n F<sub>1</sub>. Acetamiprid,   imidacloprid, lufenur&oacute;n y triflumur&oacute;n fueron inocuos (clase 1).</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"></font>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b> <font size="3">Palabras clave: </font></b>Solanaceae. Parasitoides de huevos. Pesticidas. Efectos colaterales.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> <hr /> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  Introduction</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>  Parasitoid insects are well known for their efficient control   of pests in several cultures. Among these pest control agents,   those from the <i>Trichogramma</i> genus have attracted attention   worldwide (Scholz <i>et al</i>. 1998) for parasitizing eggs and killing   hosts before pest emergence and plant attack (Lundgren   <i>et al</i>. 2002).</p>     <p>  In Brazil, 28 species of <i>Trichogramma</i> have been reported   in almost all regions (Querino and Zucchi 2003)   and associated    with hosts such as <i>Tuta absoluta</i> (Meyrich,   1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), <i>Neoleucinodes elegantalis</i>   (Guen&eacute;e, 1854) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), and <i>Helicoverpa zea</i> (Boddie, 1850) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), which are tomato   crops pests (Zucchi and Monteiro 1997). Due to the importance   of the <i>Trichogramma</i> species as a natural enemy of   several tomato culture pests, studies on its use as a biological   pest control agent together with other methods, particularly   insecticides, as they are still used in large quantities in pest   control in tomato crops, are fundamental. The information   obtained will be instrumental in decision-making in integrated   pest management programs aiming at the use of these   natural enemies in agroecosystems, the reduction of pesticide   use, and the minimization of the related human health hazards   (Ruberson and Tillman 1999; Carvalho <i>et al</i>. 2001; Medina <i>et al</i>. 2003; Moura <i>et al</i>. 2005).</p>     <p>  Thus, the present work aimed to evaluate the residual and   sublethal effects of the new insecticides recommended for tomato   crops on adult specimens of the maternal generation of   <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i> Riley, 1879 and F<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub> generation parasitoid specimens.</p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  Material and Methods</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  Bioassays were carried out with <i>T. pretiosum</i> adult insects   collected from <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i> (J. E. Smith, 1797)   (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs in a maize crops in Pira&ccedil;icaba   city, S&atilde;o Paulo, Brazil. The parasitoid was reared on eggs  of factitious host <i>Anagasta kuehniella</i> (Zeller, 1879) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in laboratory at 2 4 &plusmn; 2&deg;C , 70 &plusmn; 10% relative humidity, and 12-h photophase.</p>     <p>  The assayed insecticides in dosages higher recommended   by the manufacturer for the tomato crop were acetamiprid   (0.05 g a.i./L), lufenuron (0.04 g a.i./L), imidacloprid (0.14 g   a.i./L), novaluron (0.02 g a.i./L), triflumuron (0.14 g a.i./L),   and pyriproxifen (0.1 g a.i./L). Distilled water was used as   a control treatment. Newly-emerged females (20) were submitted   to individual treatment in 8-cm x 2.5-cm glass tubes   and fed with honey droplets laid on the inside wall of the   tubes. The tubes were closed with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) film.</p>     <p>  About 125 eggs of <i>A. kuehniella </i>aged no more than 24 h   were glued to 5cm x 0.5cm paper strips with 50% Arabic gum   diluted in distilled water. The eggs were sterilized with a germicidal   lamp (Parra 1997) and dip-treated in insecticide solutions   or distilled water (control) for 5 s. The strips with the   treated eggs were presented to <i>T. pretiosum</i> females one, 24,   and 48 hours after treatment for 24 h. Next, the females were   kept in the tubes and the paper strips with supposedly parasitized   eggs were transferred to new recipients and kept in   acclimatized chamber in the conditions previously described   until the emergence of the F<sub>1</sub> generation.</p>     <p>  The F<sub>1</sub> generation females newly-emerged from treated   <i>A. kuehniella </i>eggs were placed in individual glass tubes with   untreated host eggs glued to new paper strips. The same procedures   described before for the maternal generation females   were adopted in this step (number of females, paper strip size,   number of host eggs). The longevity and parasitism capacity   of the maternal generation females, the emergence ratio, the   sex ratio, and the longevity and parasitism capacity of F<sub>1</sub> and   F<sub>2</sub> generation specimens, were evaluated. Each treatment involved   five repetitions. The control treatment involved four   paper strips with parasitized host eggs. A completely randomized   three x seven (three periods of parasitoid development   vs. seven substances, totaling 21 treatments) factorial experimental   design was used. The data obtained were submitted   to variance analysis and the means were compared by the   Scott-Knott grouping test at 5% significance (Scott and Knott 1974).</p>     <p>  The evaluated insecticides were toxicologically classified   in relation to their reduction of the parasitism capacity of maternal,   F<sub>1</sub>, and F<sub>2</sub> generation females, as well as the emergence   of F<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub> generation specimens in relation to the control   treatment as follows: 1 = harmless (&lt; 30% reduction), 2 =   slightly harmful (30-79% reduction), 3 = moderately harmful   (80-99% reduction), and 4 = harmful (&gt; 99% reduction), as   recommended by the &ldquo;International Organization for Biological   and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants&rdquo;   (IOBC) (Sterk <i>et al</i>. 1999). The mean percent reduction of   survival of the parasitoid was calculated with the following   equation: % reduction = 100 - [(% general mean of the treatment   with the insecticide/% general mean of the control treatment) x 100].</p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  Results and Discussion</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>  <b>Longevity of Maternal Generation.</b> Insecticides acetamiprid,   imidacloprid, lufenuron, triflumuron, and novaluron   reduced the longevity of maternal generation females exposed   to their residues 1 h after the treatment of the host eggs.   Pyriproxifen was the only insecticide that did not affect this   biological characteristic. No significant differences were observed   in longevity of females exposed to treated host eggs   24 h after the insecticide treatment (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab1.gif" target="_blank">Table 1</a>). In turn, acetamiprid   and pyriproxifen reduced the longevity of females exposed   to treated host eggs 48 h after treatment by 6.1 and 6.0   days on average, respectively. Similar results were obtained   for the toxicity of imidacloprid by Moura <i>et al</i>. (2004), who   reported a reduction in longevity for females of <i>T. pretiosum</i>   exposed to <i>A. kuehniella </i>eggs treated with 1.16 a.i./L of this insecticide 1 h after treatment.</p>     <p>  No differences were observed in the mean longevity of   <i>T. pretiosum</i> females exposed to host eggs treated with acetamiprid,   lufenuron, and triflumuron between the exposure   periods. Imidacloprid was the only insecticide that did not   affect the longevity of females exposed to treated eggs after   48 h, while pyriproxifen reduced the longevity of females 24   and 48 h after exposure in relation to females exposed to host   eggs 1 h after treatment. The longevity of females exposed to   imidacloprid and novaluron increased with time. When the   eggs were presented 1 h after treatment, the female longevity   was 5.9 and 5.5 days, respectively. However, the exposure to   host eggs 48 h after the treatment resulted in mean parasitoid   longevity values of 7.8 and 8.6 days, respectively (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab1.gif" target="_blank">Table 1</a>).  </p>     <p><b>Eggs Parasitized by Maternal Generation. </b>The parasitism   capacity of <i>T. pretiosum</i> females exposed to host eggs   one, 24, and 48 h after treatment with pyriproxifen was reduced,   presenting means of 21.8, 18.9, and 18.1 parasitized   eggs per female, respectively, without significant differences between the exposure periods. The exposure to eggs treated   with imidacloprid and triflumuron also reduced the parasitism   capacity of insects exposed to the eggs 1 h after the treatment   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab2.gif" target="_blank">Table 2</a>). Similar results obtained in studies by Rocha   and Carvalho (2004) also evidenced a reduction in the parasitism   capacity of <i>T. pretiosum</i> females that had been exposed   to triflumuron residues present on treated surfaces. Castelo   Branco <i>et al</i>. (2003) also reported that triflumuron reduced   the percentage of <i>Helicoverpa zea</i> (Boddie, 1850) eggs parasitized   by <i>T. pretiosum</i>, which led the authors to recommend   not employing it in areas where the use of the insecticideparasitoid   association was planned.</p>     <p>  When <i>T. pretiosum</i> was exposed to host eggs 48 h after   treatment with imidacloprid, its parasitism capacity was reduced   to 18.1 eggs/female on average, in relation to the other   post-treatment periods. In contrast, acetamiprid, lufenuron,   and novaluron did not reduce this biological characteristic,   regardless of the post-treatment time of exposure of the females   to the treated eggs (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab2.gif" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).These results confirm   those reported by Moura <i>et al</i>. (2004), possibly because the   presence of acetamiprid residues on the host eggs did not repel   the females and consequently did not affect the <i>T. pretiosum</i>   reproduction capacity.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  Moura <i>et al</i>. (2006) reported divergent results from the   current ones for adult <i>T. pretiosum</i>. They observed that the   parasitism capacity of females exposed to a glass surface   containing acetamiprid residues was reduced by 98.3%. The   toxic effect of acetamiprid on <i>T. pretiosum</i> females is thought   to be related to their larger exposure to residues on glass   plates in relation to host egg cards. Due to the reduction of   parasitism by pyriproxifen, it was placed in class 2, slightly   harmful, while acetamiprid, imidacloprid, lufenuron, triflumuron,   and novaluron were classified as harmless (class 1)   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab2.gif" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).</p>     <p>  <b>Emergence of F<sub>1</sub> Generation.</b> The emergence of F<sub>1</sub> generation   parasitoids was affected by novaluron when the females   were exposed to host eggs one, 24, and 48 h after treatment   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab3.gif" target="_blank">Table 3</a>). Its toxicity increased with time, suggesting   a larger concentration of these inside the host eggs, which   increased the mortality of the parasitoid in the embryonic   period, as also reported by Carvalho <i>et al</i>. (2001), C&ocirc;nsoli <i>et al</i>. (2001), and Moura <i>et al</i>. (2005). Imidacloprid and triflumuron   also affected the percent of emergence of F<sub>1</sub> generation   parasitoids when the maternal generation females were   exposed to the insecticides 1 h after egg treatment, resulting   in mean emergence values of 79.1 and 72.8%, respectively   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab3.gif" target="_blank">Table 3</a>). Carvalho <i>et al</i>. (2003) obtained similar results for   imidacloprid and triflumuron. They observed a reduction   in the emergence of <i>T. pretiosum</i> F<sub>1</sub> generation specimens   from factitious host eggs exposed for parasitism 1 h after   treatment. They also confirmed the results of Moura <i>et al</i>.   (2004), who observed that imidacloprid was harmful for the   emergence of the <i>T. pretiosum</i> F<sub>1</sub> generation, regardless of   the period of exposure of the maternal generation females to   the treated host eggs.</p>     <p>No negative effects were observed on the emergence of   F<sub>1</sub> generation specimens when maternal generation females   were exposed to treated eggs 24 h after treatment with acetamiprid,   imidacloprid, lufenuron, triflumuron, and pyriproxifen.   Imidacloprid reduced the emergence of descendents of   females exposed to <i>A. kuehniella </i>eggs 48 h after egg treatment   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab3.gif" target="_blank">Table 3</a>). Only acetamiprid and lufenuron did not affect   the emergence of <i>T. pretiosum</i> F<sub>1</sub> generation specimens after   exposure to treated host eggs at any of the periods.</p>     <p>When eggs of factitious host were treated with triflumuron   and offered to the maternal generation females, one   and 48 hours after contamination, the number of insects that   emerged did not decrease, presenting averages of 72.8% and   90.2%, respectively. As novaluron reduced the emergence   of F<sub>1</sub> generation parasitoids, it was classified as class 2 =   slightly harmful (30-79% emergence reduction) and the other   insecticides fell into class 1 = harmless (&lt;30% emergence reduction) (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab3.gif" target="_blank">Table 3</a>).</p>     <p>  <b>Longevity of F<sub>1</sub> Generation. </b>The longevity of F<sub>1</sub> generation   females was not negatively affected by any of the insecticides   when the maternal generation was exposed to treated   host eggs one and 24 h after treatment (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab4.gif" target="_blank">Table 4</a>). However,   Carvalho <i>et al</i>. (2003) observed negative effects on the longevity   of <i>T. pretiosum</i> F<sub>1</sub> generation females exposed to host   eggs dip-treated with lufenuron and triflumuron 1 h after   treatment. The differences found for lufenuron are thought   to result from the larger dose of this insecticide (0.4 g a.i.\L) used in this study.</p>     <p>  In contrast, pyriproxifen was the only product to reduce   the longevity of exposed F<sub>1</sub> generation females 48 h after   host egg treatment, with a mean of 4.6 days (Table 4). No   significant difference was observed in mean longevity of   F<sub>1</sub> generation females of <i>T. pretiosum</i> exposed to host eggs   treated with imidacloprid, lufenuron, and pyriproxifen at the   post-treatment exposure times investigated. Acetamiprid and   triflumuron affected longevity only when the females were   exposed to treated eggs 1 h after treatment. Novaluron reduced   female longevity at 1-h and 48-h post-treatment exposure   times in relation to a 24-h post-treatment exposure time   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab4.gif" target="_blank">Table 4</a>).</p>     <p>  <b>Eggs Parasitized by F<sub>1</sub> Generation Females. </b>The parasitism   capacity of F<sub>1</sub> generation <i>T. pretiosum</i> was not affected   by any of the insecticides when the maternal generation females   were exposed to treated eggs 1 h after treatment (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab5.gif" target="_blank">Table   5</a>). Exposure to acetamiprid and imidacloprid reduced the   parasitism capacity of F<sub>1</sub> generation females 24 h after egg   treatment, giving means of 24.1 and 18.9 parasitized eggs/   female, respectively. Means of 14.3 and 8.8 parasitized eggs/   female were obtained at 24 and 48 h after host egg treatment   with pyriproxifen, demonstrating a reduction in parasitism   capacity. It was also observed that this product caused a decrease   in the number of eggs per female in relation to the   evaluated times (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab5.gif" target="_blank">Table 5</a>).</p>     <p>  Considering the effects of the compounds for the different   post-host egg treatment times of exposure of <i>T. pretiosum</i> females,   no significant difference was observed in the mean parasitism capacity of F<sub>1</sub> generation females exposed to host   eggs treated with acetamiprid, lufenuron, and pyriproxifen.   Imidacloprid had an effect only 24 h after treatment, while   novaluron was active only after 48 h in relation to parasitoids   exposed to host eggs 1 h after treatment (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab5.gif" target="_blank">Table 5</a>). Pyriproxifen   reduced the parasitism capacity of F<sub>1</sub> generation females,   fitting into class 2 = slightly harmful (30-79% reduction), and   the other insecticides fell into class 1 = harmless (&lt; 30% reduction)   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab5.gif" target="_blank">Table 5</a>).</p>     <p>  <b>Emergence of F<sub>2</sub> Generation. </b>The emergence of F<sub>2</sub> generation   specimens was not affected by any of the insecticides   when maternal females were exposed to treated eggs 1 h   and 24 h after treatment. Novaluron negatively affected the   emergence percentage of F<sub>2</sub> generation insects from maternal   generation   females exposed to treated host eggs 48 h posttreatment,   affording 44.2% emergence. Triflumuron produced   higher emergence percentages for F<sub>2</sub> generation specimens,   with means ranging from 85.3 to 94.8% (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a>).   When the effect of exposure to the insecticides after the   various times was evaluated, significant differences were   found for mean emergence values of F<sub>2</sub> generation specimens   exposed to host eggs treated with acetamiprid, lufenuron,   triflumuron, and pyriproxifen. Imidacloprid did not have an   effect at 48 h after treatment, while novaluron reduced only   the parasitism capacity of females at this time in relation to   those exposed to treated host eggs 1 h and 24 h after treatment   (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a>). Despite the negative effects on F<sub>2</sub> specimen   emergence observed for some of the tested insecticides, all   fell into class 1 = harmless, according to the IOBC toxicity   categories (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a>).</p>     <p>  <b>Longevity of F<sub>2</sub> Generation. </b>Acetamiprid, lufenuron, triflumuron,   and novaluron produced a longevity reduction in <i>T. pretiosum</i> F<sub>2</sub> generation females when maternal generation   females were exposed to treated host eggs 1 h after treatment.   Yet only imidacloprid and triflumuron reduced the longevity   of F<sub>2</sub> generation females exposed to their residues 24 h after   treatment, giving means of 4.7 and 5.2 days, respectively. In   contrast, none of the insecticides affected the longevity of F<sub>2</sub>   generation females when maternal generation females were   exposed to host eggs 48 h after treatment (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab7.gif" target="_blank">Table 7</a>).   No significant difference was observed in longevity of   the F<sub>2</sub> generation females of <i>T. pretiosum</i> exposed to host   eggs treated with triflumuron and pyriproxifen at the studied   exposure times. Lufenuron and novaluron only affected the   longevity of maternal generation females exposed to treated   eggs 1 h after treatment, while imidacloprid reduced the longevity   of females only at 24-h exposure after treatment in relation   to specimens exposed to treated host eggs 1- and 48-h   post treatment (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab7.gif" target="_blank">Table 7</a>).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  <b>Eggs Parasitized by F<sub>2</sub> Generation Females.</b> Pyriproxifen   reduced the parasitism capacity of F<sub>2</sub> generation females when   the maternal generation was exposed to its residues one, 24,   and 48 h after the treatment of host eggs. Acetamiprid, imidacloprid,   and novaluron also reduced the parasitism of F<sub>2</sub> generation   females, but only when the maternal generation   was exposed to treated host eggs 1 h after treatment. Lufenuron   and triflumuron were harmless for parasitism capacity, resulting   in mean oviposition values ranging from 29 to 49 eggs   per female (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab8.gif" target="_blank">Table 8</a>).</p>     <p>  No reduction in parasitism capacity was observed for F<sub>2</sub>   generation females for acetamiprid, while lufenuron, triflumuron,   and novaluron had no affect on the parasitism capacity   of maternal generation females only in the circumstance   where they were exposed to treated eggs 1 h after treatment.   Imidacloprid reduced the parasitism capacity of females only   for exposure 48 h after treatment in relation to specimens exposed   to treated host eggs 1- and 24-h post treatment (Table   8). Considering the effects of the insecticides on the parasitism   capacity of F<sub>2</sub> generation, they belong to class 1 = harmless, according to IOBC (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v36n2/v36n2a03tab8.gif" target="_blank">Table 8</a>).</p>     <p>  In summary, pyriproxifen was slightly harmful (class   2) for the parasitism capacity of maternal and F<sub>1</sub> generation   females of <i>T. pretiosum</i>. Novaluron was slightly harmful   (class 2) for the emergence of F<sub>1</sub> generation specimens.   Acetamiprid, imidacloprid, lufenuron, and triflumuron were   harmless (class 1) to <i>T. pretiosum</i> and are recommendable for   integrated pest management programs aiming at the preservation of this parasitoid species.</p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  Acknowledgements</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>  For research grants from Funda&ccedil;&atilde;o de Amparo &agrave; Pesquisa do   Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Conselho Nacional   de Desenvolvimento Cient&iacute;fico e Tecnol&oacute;gico (CNPq) for financial support.</p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  Literature cited</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <!-- ref --><p>  CARVALHO, G. A.; PARRA, J. R. P.; BAPTISTA, G. C. 2001.   Impacto de produtos fitossanit&aacute;rios utilizados na cultura do tomateiro   na fase adulta de duas linhagens de <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i>   Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: <i>Trichogramma</i>tidae). Ci&ecirc;ncia e Agrotecnologia (Brasil, Lavras) 25 (3): 560-568, Jul./Set.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000049&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  CARVALHO, G. A.; FUINI, L. C.; ROCHA, L. C. D.; MORAES, J.   C.; ECOLE, C. C. 2003. Avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o da seletividade de inseticidas   utilizados na tomaticultura a <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i> Riley,   1879 (Hymenoptera: <i>Trichogramma</i>tidae). Ecossistema (Brasil, Esp&iacute;rito Santo do Pinhal) 28 (1/2): 23-30.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000050&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  CASTELO BRANCO, M.; PONTES, L. A.; AMARAL, P. S. T.;   MESQUITA FILHO, M. V. 2003. Inseticidas para o controle da   tra&ccedil;a-do-tomateiro e broca-grande e seu impacto sobre <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i>. Horticultura Brasileira (Brasil, Bras&iacute;lia) 21 (4): 652-654.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000051&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  C&Ocirc;NSOLI, F. L.; BOTELHO, P. S. M.; PARRA, J. R. P. 2001. Selectivity   of insecticides to the egg parasitoid <i>Trichogramma   galloi </i>Zucchi, 1988 (Hym., <i>Trichogramma</i>tidae). Journal of   Applied Entomology 125 (1/2): 37-43.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000052&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  LUNDGREN, J. G.; HEIMPEL, G. E.; BOMGREN A. S. 2002.   Comparison of <i>Trichogramma brassicae</i> (Hymenoptera:   <i>Trichogramma</i>tidae) augmentation with organic and synthetic   pesticides for control of cruciferous Lepidoptera. Environmental Entomology 31 (6): 1231-1239.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000053&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  MEDINA, P.; SMAGGHE G.; BUDIA, F.; TIRRY, L.; VI&Ntilde;UELA   E. 2003. Toxicity and absorption of azadirachtin, diflubenzuron,   pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide after topical application in   predatory   larvae of <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology 32 (1): 196-203.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000054&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  MOURA, A. P.; CARVALHO, G. A.; RIGITANO, R. L. O. 2004.   Efeito residual de novos inseticidas utilizados na cultura do   tomateiro sobre <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i> Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera:   <i>Trichogramma</i>tidae). Acta Scientiarum Agronomy   (Brasil, Maring&aacute;) 26 (2): 231-237.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000055&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  MOURA, A. P.; CARVALHO, G. A.; RIGITANO, R. L. O. 2005.   Toxicidade de inseticidas utilizados na cultura do tomateiro a   <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i>. Pesquisa Agropecu&aacute;ria Brasileira (Brasil, Bras&iacute;lia) 40 (3): 203-210.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000056&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  MOURA, A. P.; CARVALHO, G. A; PEREIRA, A. E.; ROCHA,   L. C. D. 2006. Selectivity evaluation of insecticides used to <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i>. Biocontrol 51 (6): 769-778.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000057&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  PARRA, J. R. P. 1997. T&eacute;cnicas de cria&ccedil;&atilde;o de <i>Anagasta kuehniella</i>,   hospedeiro alternativo para produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de <i>Trichogramma</i>. cap.4,   pp.121-150. In: PARRA, J. R. P.; ZUCCHI, R. A. (Eds.). <i>Trichogramma</i>   e o controle biol&oacute;gico aplicado. FEALQ. Brasil. Piracicaba. 324 p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000058&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  QUERINO, R. B.; ZUCCHI, R. A. 2003. New species of <i>Trichogramma</i>   Westwood (Hymenoptera: <i>Trichogramma</i>tidae)   associated   with lepidopterous eggs in Brazil. Zootaxa (Auckland) 163 (1): 1-10.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000059&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  ROCHA, L. C. D.; CARVALHO, G. A. 2004. Adapta&ccedil;&atilde;o da metodologia   padr&atilde;o da IOBC para estudos de seletividade com   <i>Trichogramma pretiosum</i> Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: <i>Trichogramma</i>tidae)   em condi&ccedil;&otilde;es de laborat&oacute;rio. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy (Brasil, Maring&aacute;) 26 (3): 315-320.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000060&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  RUBERSON, J. R.; TILLMAN P. G. 1999. Effect of selected insecticides   on natural enemies in cotton: laboratory studies. pp.   1210-1213. In: Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Conferences. 3-7   January 1999, New Orleans, LA. National Cotton Council Orlando, Florida. USA.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000061&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  SCHOLZ, B. C. G.; MONSOUR C. J.; ZALUCKI M. P. 1998. An   evaluation of selective <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> control options in sweet corn. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture   (Australia, Collingwood) 38 (6): 601-607.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000062&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  SCOTT, A. J.; KNOTT, M. A. A. 1974. cluster analysis method for   grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30 (3): 507-512.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000063&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  STERK, G.; HASSAN, S. A.; BAILLOD, M.; BAKKER, F.; BIGLER,   F.; BL&Uuml;MEL, S.; BOGENSCH&Uuml;TZ, H.; BOLLER, E.;   BROMAND, B.; BRUN, J.; CALIS, J. N. M.; COREMANSPELSENEER,   J.; DUSO, C.; GARRIDO, A.; GROVE, A.;   HEIMBACH, U.; HOKKANEN, H.; JACAS, J.; LEWIS, G.;   MORETH, L.; POLGAR, L.; ROVERSTI, L.; SAMS&Oslash;E-PETERSEN,   L.; SAUPHANOR, B.; SCHAUB, L.; ST&Auml;UBLI, A.;   TUSET, J. J.; VAINIO, A.; VAN DE VEIRE, M.; VIGGIANI,   G.; VI&Ntilde;UELA, E.; VOGT, H. 1999. Results of the seventh joint   pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRSWorking   Group ´Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms´. BioControl 44 (1): 99-117.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000064&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  ZUCCHI, R. A.; MONTEIRO, R. C. 1997. O g&ecirc;nero <i>Trichogramma</i>   na Am&eacute;rica do Sul. cap.2, pp. 41-66. In: PARRA, J. R. P.; ZUCCHI,   R. A. (Eds.). <i>Trichogramma</i> e o controle biol&oacute;gico aplicado. FEALQ. Brasil. Piracicaba. 324 p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000065&pid=S0120-0488201000020000300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARVALHO, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARRA, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAPTISTA, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Impacto de produtos fitossanitários utilizados na cultura do tomateiro na fase adulta de duas linhagens de Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ciência e Agrotecnologia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>560-568</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARVALHO, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FUINI, L]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROCHA, L]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORAES, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ECOLE, C]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Avaliação da seletividade de inseticidas utilizados na tomaticultura a Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecossistema]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>1/2</numero>
<issue>1/2</issue>
<page-range>23-30</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Espírito Santo do Pinhal ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CASTELO BRANCO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PONTES, L]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AMARAL, P]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MESQUITA FILHO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Inseticidas para o controle da traça-do-tomateiro e broca-grande e seu impacto sobre Trichogramma pretiosum.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Horticultura Brasileira]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>652-654</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CÔNSOLI, F]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOTELHO, P]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARRA, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Selectivity of insecticides to the egg parasitoid Trichogramma galloi Zucchi, 1988 (Hym., Trichogrammatidae).]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Applied Entomology]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>125</volume>
<numero>1/2</numero>
<issue>1/2</issue>
<page-range>37-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LUNDGREN, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HEIMPEL, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOMGREN A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparison of Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) augmentation with organic and synthetic pesticides for control of cruciferous Lepidoptera.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Environmental Entomology]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1231-1239</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MEDINA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SMAGGHE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUDIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TIRRY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIÑUELA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Toxicity and absorption of azadirachtin, diflubenzuron, pyriproxyfen, and tebufenozide after topical application in predatory larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Environmental Entomology]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>196-203</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOURA, A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARVALHO, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIGITANO, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Efeito residual de novos inseticidas utilizados na cultura do tomateiro sobre Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Scientiarum Agronomy]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>231-237</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Maringá ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOURA, A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARVALHO, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIGITANO, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Toxicidade de inseticidas utilizados na cultura do tomateiro a Trichogramma pretiosum.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>203-210</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOURA, A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARVALHO, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PEREIRA, A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROCHA, L]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Selectivity evaluation of insecticides used to Trichogramma pretiosum.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biocontrol]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>769-778</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARRA, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Técnicas de criação de Anagasta kuehniella, hospedeiro alternativo para produção de Trichogramma.]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARRA, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZUCCHI, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Trichogramma e o controle biológico aplicado.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>121-150</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Piracicaba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FEALQ]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[QUERINO, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZUCCHI, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[New species of Trichogramma Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) associated with lepidopterous eggs in Brazil.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zootaxa]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>163</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROCHA, L]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARVALHO, G]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Adaptação da metodologia padrão da IOBC para estudos de seletividade com Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) em condições de laboratório.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scientiarum Agronomy]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>315-320</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Maringá ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RUBERSON, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TILLMAN P]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of selected insecticides on natural enemies in cotton: laboratory studies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Conferences]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<month>7 </month>
<day>Ja</day>
<page-range>1210-1213</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New Orleans^eUSA USA]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[LA. National Cotton Council Orlando]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHOLZ, B]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZALUCKI M]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An evaluation of selective Helicoverpa armigera control options in sweet corn.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>601-607</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Collingwood ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCOTT, A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KNOTT, M]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>507-512</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STERK]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HASSAN, S]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAILLOD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAKKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BIGLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BLÜMEL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOGENSCHÜTZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOLLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BROMAND]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRUN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CALIS, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N. M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COREMANSPELSENEER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DUSO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARRIDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GROVE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HEIMBACH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HOKKANEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JACAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEWIS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORETH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[POLGAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROVERSTI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SAMSØE-PETERSEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SAUPHANOR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHAUB]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STÄUBLI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TUSET, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAINIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VAN DE VEIRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIGGIANI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VIÑUELA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VOGT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRSWorking Group ´Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms´]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BioControl]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>99-117</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZUCCHI, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MONTEIRO, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O gênero Trichogramma na América do Sul]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PARRA, J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ZUCCHI, R]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Trichogramma e o controle biológico aplicado.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>41-66</page-range><page-range>324</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Piracicaba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FEALQ]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
