<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-0488</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Colombiana de Entomología]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Colomb. Entomol.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-0488</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Colombiana de Entomología]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-04882011000100020</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Galling arthropod diversity in the subtropical neotropics: Espinilho savannah and riparian forests compared]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Diversidad de artrópodos agalladores en el neotrópico subtropical: Sabana de Espinilho y bosques riparios comparados]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDONÇA, JR.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MILTON DE S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Biociências, UFRGS Departamento de Zoologia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Porto Alegre RS]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>111</fpage>
<lpage>116</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-04882011000100020&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-04882011000100020&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-04882011000100020&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Xeric sites with scleromorphic vegetation appear to have higher gall-inducing arthropod richness as revealed in studies of local faunas across the world, and the harsh environment hypothesis (HEH) was proposed to explain this. However, plant richness also seems to influence galling arthropod richness positively, which appears paradoxical on a biogeographical scale. To test the HEH in southern Brazil, a sampling regime distinct from the usual local survey was adopted: eight transects were sampled during 90 min counting all galls; this was repeated three times over one year for the same transects. Xeric espinilho savannah (five transects) and mesic Uruguay River riparian forests (three transects) in subtropical Brazil were compared. Fifty-nine gall morphotypes on 15 host families were recognized out of 12,355 individual galls. Riparian forests were richer (individual-based rarefaction) and had higher gall equitabilities (bootstrapped 95% CIs); this contradicted the HEH. The plant richness hypothesis was generally supported because forests were recorded as richer in both plants and host plants. Vegetation types had different galling and host plant compositions; the latter may drive the former. Species pools appear distinct among environments, even adjacent ones, given the low similarities found. This further negates the ecological process of preference for xeric sites proposed in the HEH.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Sitios xéricos con vegetación escleromórfica parecen tener mayor riqueza de artrópodos inductores de agallas de acuerdo con estudios de faunas locales en todo el mundo, y la hipótesis del estrés higrotermal (HSH) fue propuesta para explicarlo. No obstante, la riqueza de plantas también parece influenciar la riqueza de inductores de agallas positivamente, lo que parece paradójico en una escala biogeográfica. Para probar la HSH en el sur de Brasil, se adoptó un régimen de muestreo distinto de los acostumbrados inventarios locales: se muestrearon ocho transectos por 90 min contando todas las agallas; esto se repitió tres veces a lo largo de un año en los mismos transectos. Se compararon sabana espinillo xérico (cinco transectos) y bosques ribereños mésicos del Rio Uruguay (tres transectos) en el Brasil subtropical. Se reconocieron 59 morfotipos de agallas en 15 familias de hospederos de los 12,355 agallas individuales. Los bosques ribereños fueron más ricos (según la rarefacción basada en individuos) y tuvieron equitabilidades más elevadas (según los intervalos de confianza de 95% por bootstrap); esto contradijo la HSH. La hipótesis de la riqueza de plantas fue soportada de modo general ya que se registraron los bosques con más riqueza en términos de plantas y plantas hospederas. Los tipos de vegetación tuvieron diferentes composiciones de agallas y de plantas hospederas; esta última puede ser responsable de la primera. Los conjuntos de especies parecen distintos entre ambientes, incluso los adyacentes, dadas las bajas similitudes encontradas. Esto también niega el proceso ecológico de preferencia por sitios xéricos propuesto en la HSH.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cecidomyiidae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Eryophidae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Host plant]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Community similarity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Brazil]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cecidomyiidae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Eryophidae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Planta hospedera]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Similitud de la comunidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Brasil]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[   <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p align="right"><b>Secci&oacute;n B&aacute;sica</b></p> </font>     <p align="center"><font size="4" face="Verdana"><b>Galling arthropod diversity in the subtropical neotropics:   Espinilho savannah and riparian forests compared</b></font></p>     <p align="center"><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b> Diversidad de artr&oacute;podos agalladores en el neotr&oacute;pico subtropical: Sabana de Espinilho    y bosques riparios comparados </b></font></p>     <p align="left"><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>MILTON DE S. MENDON&#199;A, JR.<sup>1</sup></b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p align="left"><sup>1</sup> Ph.D. Biologia Animal &amp; Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Bioci&ecirc;ncias, UFRGS. present address: Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Bioci&ecirc;ncias,   UFRGS; Av. Bento Gon&#231;alves, 9500, CEP 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. <a href="mailto:milton.mendonca@ufrgs.br">milton.mendonca@ufrgs.br</a></p>     <p><b>Recibido</b>: 8-jun-2010 - <b>Aceptado</b>: 31-mar-2011</p> </font> <hr />     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Abstract: </b></font><font size="2" face="Verdana">Xeric sites with scleromorphic vegetation appear to have higher gall-inducing arthropod richness as revealed   in studies of local faunas across the world, and the harsh environment hypothesis (HEH) was proposed to explain this.   However, plant richness also seems to influence galling arthropod richness positively, which appears paradoxical on a   biogeographical scale. To test the HEH in southern Brazil, a sampling regime distinct from the usual local survey was   adopted: eight transects were sampled during 90 min counting all galls; this was repeated three times over one year for   the same transects. Xeric espinilho savannah (five transects) and mesic Uruguay River riparian forests (three transects)   in subtropical Brazil were compared. Fifty-nine gall morphotypes on 15 host families were recognized out of 12,355   individual galls. Riparian forests were richer (individual-based rarefaction) and had higher gall equitabilities (bootstrapped   95% CIs); this contradicted the HEH. The plant richness hypothesis was generally supported because forests   were recorded as richer in both plants and host plants. Vegetation types had different galling and host plant compositions;   the latter may drive the former. Species pools appear distinct among environments, even adjacent ones, given the   low similarities found. This further negates the ecological process of preference for xeric sites proposed in the HEH.</font></p>     <p> <font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Key word:</font></b> Cecidomyiidae. Eryophidae. Host plant. Community similarity. Brazil.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> <hr /> </font>     <p> <font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Resumen:</font></b> Sitios x&eacute;ricos con vegetaci&oacute;n esclerom&oacute;rfica parecen tener mayor riqueza de artr&oacute;podos inductores de agallas   de acuerdo con estudios de faunas locales en todo el mundo, y la hip&oacute;tesis del estr&eacute;s higrotermal (HSH) fue propuesta   para explicarlo. No obstante, la riqueza de plantas tambi&eacute;n parece influenciar la riqueza de inductores de agallas   positivamente, lo que parece parad&oacute;jico en una escala biogeogr&aacute;fica. Para probar la HSH en el sur de Brasil, se adopt&oacute;   un r&eacute;gimen de muestreo distinto de los acostumbrados inventarios locales: se muestrearon ocho transectos por 90 min   contando todas las agallas; esto se repiti&oacute; tres veces a lo largo de un a&ntilde;o en los mismos transectos. Se compararon   sabana espinillo x&eacute;rico (cinco transectos) y bosques ribere&ntilde;os m&eacute;sicos del Rio Uruguay (tres transectos) en el Brasil   subtropical. Se reconocieron 59 morfotipos de agallas en 15 familias de hospederos de los 12,355 agallas individuales.   Los bosques ribere&ntilde;os fueron m&aacute;s ricos (seg&uacute;n la rarefacci&oacute;n basada en individuos) y tuvieron equitabilidades m&aacute;s   elevadas (seg&uacute;n los intervalos de confianza de 95% por bootstrap); esto contradijo la HSH. La hip&oacute;tesis de la riqueza   de plantas fue soportada de modo general ya que se registraron los bosques con m&aacute;s riqueza en t&eacute;rminos de plantas y   plantas hospederas. Los tipos de vegetaci&oacute;n tuvieron diferentes composiciones de agallas y de plantas hospederas; esta   &uacute;ltima puede ser responsable de la primera. Los conjuntos de especies parecen distintos entre ambientes, incluso los   adyacentes, dadas las bajas similitudes encontradas. Esto tambi&eacute;n niega el proceso ecol&oacute;gico de preferencia por sitios   x&eacute;ricos propuesto en la HSH.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> <font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Palabras clave: </font></b>Cecidomyiidae. Eryophidae. Planta hospedera. Similitud de la comunidad. Brasil.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> <hr /> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Studies on the biodiversity of arthropod gall-makers have   increased in numbers in later years, with work in many geographical   regions and with different approaches to measure   diversity (Wright and Samways 1996, 1998; Price <i>et al</i>. 1998;   Blanche 2000; Blanche and Ludwig 2001; Gon&#231;alves-Alvim   and Fernandes 2001a,b; Yukawa <i>et al</i>. 2001; Fernandes <i>et al</i>.   2002; Veldtman and McGeoch 2003; Cuevas-Reyes <i>et al</i>.   2003, 2004; Dalbem and Mendon&#231;a 2006). The first ideas   on global patterns of diversity for insect gall-makers emerge   from the work of Fernandes and Price with data on altitudinal   and latitudinal gradients from different parts of the world   (Fernandes and Price 1988, 1991; Price <i>et al</i>. 1998). Fernandes   and Price hypotheses have been variedly tested and   discussed, leading to an intense debate.  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">The hygrothermal stress or harsh environment hypothesis   considers that xeric sites harbour higher local gall-in-ducing insect richness than mesic sites because of a combination   of abiotic stress such as a dry climate would benefit   endophytophages such as gallers, decrease predators and   parasitoid attack (Fernandes and Price 1992) and the suite   of morphological and physiological characters shown by   scleromorphic plants in these sites, such as resistant and   long-lived leaves, low levels of plant defence investment.   The plant richness hypothesis explains differences in gallinducing   taxa diversity among sites by arguing that the   more plant species are in a site, the higher the number of   gall-inducing species can be. Some sources give credit to   this view (Wright and Samways 1996, 1998; Veldtman and   McGeoch 2003; Gon&#231;alves-Alvim and Fernandes 2001a;   Dalbem and Mendon&#231;a 2006), while the pattern seen by   Price <i>et al</i>. (1998) does not conform to this hypothesis on a   global scale; however this pattern emerges from comparing   local samples for a single diversity variable, species density   (sensu Gotelli and Colwell 2001).</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Comprehensive hypotheses on the origin of arthropod   galler species diversity, especially including speciation and   extinction processes, must depend on a series of assumptions   about population and community ecology of such gallers,   along with explicit treatments of the spatial scales considered   (Mendon&#231;a 2001). Thus, a hierarchical view of hypotheses   for species richness, with evolutionary explanations initiating   at behavioural and population levels up to community   factors is needed, along with more detailed information on   diversity at local, regional and global scales; this is a recently   adopted framework to attempt producing a general theory for   biodiversity (Hubbell 2001). Localized small-scale biodiversity   surveys will rarely be able to test wide-scale hypotheses;   however, insights can be gained for general patterns.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Gall-inducing arthropod diversity was evaluated for two   contrasting vegetation types, the xeric espinilho savannah and   the adjacent mesic riparian forests of the western portion of   the state of Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, within a Conservation   Unit (Espinilho State Park). Diversity was evaluated   through different variables and with two distinct analytical   approaches: comparing individual samples and pooling samples   for sites. The expectation under the harsh environment   hypothesis is that species richness would be higher in xeric   than in mesic sites; abundance was also expected to be higher   in xeric sites, accompanying species richness, although data   on this aspect has been rarely gathered in the literature; perhaps   the only example in this case being Fernandes and Price   (1992), but only considering species found on both environments.   Gall identification by morphotyping allows analysis   of beta diversity patterns among vegetation types, an essential   aspect for the understanding of galling species richness   that only recently has been given attention (Gon&#231;alves-Alvim   and Fernandes 2001b; Dalbem and Mendon&#231;a 2006).</font></p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b> Materials and Methods</b></font></p>     <p> <font size="2" face="Verdana"><b>Study area. </b>The Espinilho State Park is located on the westernmost   part of Rio Grande do Sul state in southern Brazil   (30&deg;13&#39;S 51&deg;13&#39;W) and was established to protect the rare   espinilho savannah vegetation at the only spot it occurs in   Brazilian territory (SEMA 2002). The Park used to be smaller   than today and only recently (2002) the area of the Park   has been increased to its current 1617 ha. Under the ecoregion   classification of WWF Conservation Science (Olson et   al. 2001), this formation is within the Uruguayan savannah   ecoregion (NT 0710) but has close links to the Espinal (NT   0801) and Chaco (NT 0210) vegetation types of neighbouring   Argentina. It is similar in its outlook to the African savannah,   with a continuous grass cover interspersed with rare   shrubs and regularly spaced trees (parkland vegetation). Five   tree species dominate this formation: <i>Acacia caven</i> (Molina),   the espinilho, Prosopis nigra Griseb and Prosopis affinis   Sprengel, all three Mimosaceae, <i>Parkinsonia aculeata</i> L.,   1753 (Fabaceae) and <i>Aspidosperma quebrachoblanco</i> Schltr.   (Apocynaceae), with the heliophyte Mimosaceae dominating   (Galvani and Baptista 2003). The explanation for such   plant formation apparently lies in soil water drainage as first   suggested by Tortorelli (1956), and not in climate since this   is mild and rainfall abundant (climate is Cfa in the K&#246;ppen   classification, humid subtropical with no dry season and 1300   to 1500 mm rainfall per year). The dominant trees are deciduous,   have small leaves, grow with twisted branches and have   abundant thorns. Most shrubs are also thorny and twisted in   habit, thus characterising a scleromorphic syndrome for the   vegetation.  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Riparian forests run alongside most of the medium to   large-sized rivers in this region, although most brooks have   been deprived of them by human influence. The vegetation   is semi-deciduous; canopies rarely reach higher than 10 m.   These forests are richer in plant species than the savannah   and some of the most common thorny shrub species in the latter   formation also occur in the riparian forests (Galvani and   Baptista 2003).</font></p>     <p> <font size="2" face="Verdana"><b>Sampling. </b>Representative sampling sites of the two vegetation   types were chosen (espinilho savannah: 30&deg;11&#39;16&quot;S,   57&deg;27&#39;07&quot;W; 30&deg;12&#39;07&quot;S, 57&deg;29&#39;41&quot;W; 30&deg;03&#39;50&quot;S, 57&deg;23&#39;   02&quot;W; 30&deg;11&#39;06&quot;S, 57&deg;29&#39;54&quot;W; 30&deg;11&#39;50&quot;S, 57&deg;29&#39;42&quot;W;   riparian forest, 30&deg;10&#39;14&quot;S, 57&deg;33&#39;14&quot;W; 30&deg;11&#39;03&quot;S, 57&deg;   35&#39;41&quot;W; 30&deg;11&#39;07&quot;S, 57&deg;35&#39;47&quot;W). However, logistic reasons   prevented reaching an ideal sampling balance: there   were three sites for forests and five sites for espinilho. The   same sites were visited three times along a year covering all   seasons but winter, but three of the five espinilho sites had   only two visits.  </font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Sampling consisted of transecting through the sites for 1h   30min searching the vegetation for galls (as used by Dalbem   and Mendon&#231;a 2006). All galls found in the field were attributed   to provisional morphotypes and counted; a few galls   from each morphotype were collected and brought to the   laboratory. Sampling was always carried out by the author,   so sampling experience was not an issue. Because the vegetation   types sampled here were not very tall (see above),   the question of galls up in the canopy being missed during   sampling is minimised. Collected galls were used to confirm   morphotyping, being photographed and described in terms of   external and internal morphology, considering aspects such   as organ attacked, gall and chamber size, shape, colour, and   other characteristics, and occupants. Gallers were identified   to family level, however many gall types were found unoccupied   and thus taxonomic identification was impossible, although   undoubtedly such galls were caused by arthropods.   Host plants were identified to the lowest level possible as   well, however, the lack of comprehensive plant surveys and   botanical specialists in the region means identification is difficult   and tentative. Plants, galls and its occupants are kept in   the reference insect collection of the Federal University of   Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</font> </p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b>Analysis. </b>Vegetation types were compared for galling diversity   using two methods: samples (visits) as units and transects   (samples pooled) as units. Diversity with sample as unit   was analysed through a MANOVA (calculated with SPSS   13.0) with field trip order (first, second or third sample on a   site) and vegetation type as factors, with gall species density   (<i>sensu</i> Gotelli and Colwell 2001), overall gall abundance and   equitability as variables.  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Site diversity comparison was hampered by the differing   sampling efforts among sites (some with two and some with   three visits). To provide an illustration of the regional species   density, data from each vegetation irrespective of site and   sampling date was pooled with sample-based rarefaction (using <i>EstimateS</i> 8.0, Colwell 2005). Species richness between   vegetation types was compared with an individual-based rarefaction   with all samples and sites pooled for each vegetation   type; bootstrap-generated confidence intervals for equitability were compared (both performed by PASt 1.86, Hammer <i>et al</i>. 2001). Because both methods use abundance data to   estimate deviations, no comparison for galler abundance is   possible at this level.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Beta diversity patterns were illustrated for each vegetation   type with non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis   (nMDS), a preferred form of ordination for best showing   in few dimensions the relationships among sites in species   composition studies (Legendre and Legendre 1998).   Simpson and Morisita similarity indexes were used (also   performed by <i>PASt</i> 1.86) for both individual samples and   pooled samples for each site. The Simpson index is recommended   among presence/absence indexes (Koleff <i>et al</i>.   2003) because it takes species richness differences into account   when comparing two samples. The Morisita index is   recommended among quantitative measures, that is, those   taking species abundance into account (Hammer <i>et al</i>.   2001). Significance for differences in species composition   between vegetation types was accessed by ANOSIM tests   (Analysis of Similarity, randomised 10,000 times, again calculated   by <i>PASt</i> 1.86). The same analyses were performed   on host plant family and host plant species composition between   vegetation types, although only for the site level, not   the sample level. ANOSIM is in some ways equivalent to   MANOVA (comparing within group similarity to between   group similarity), but using a randomisation technique that   leads to a robust test (Clarke and Green 1998). A Mantel test   (correlation between matrices) was used to compare similarity   in galling species and host plant family among sites   (with <i>PASt</i> 1.86).</font></p>     <p> <font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Results</b></font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> After 21 samples (31.5 h of sampling) on eight sites, 59 gall   morphotypes were found out of 12355 galls counted. On   average, there were 10.5 (&plusmn;0.51 SE) gall morphotypes per   sample, of 588.3 galls counted per sample (&plusmn;145.70 SE). One   morphospecies was dominant, with 5,820 galls: this is an unknown   small Eryophidae gall on the leaflets of Acacia caven   Molina (Mimosaceae).  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Fifty-three of the host plants were identified to family   level resulting in 23 host plant species. Fifteen plant families   were found galled (Anacardiaceae, Asteraceae, Bignoniaceae,   Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Flacourtiaceae, Malvaceae,   Mimosaceae, Myrtaceae, Rhamnaceae, Rubiaceae, Sapindaceae,   Smilacaceae, Tiliaceae, and Verbenaceae). Only 24 of   the gallers were identified to order level, most belonging to   the Diptera (eight spp., six of these are Cecidomyiidae), followed   by Hemiptera, Acari, Hymenoptera (two being Cynipidae,   an infrequent group for the Neotropics), Lepidoptera and   a single Coleoptera (Curculionidae).  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">There were no differences between the two vegetation   types (MANOVA, Pillai&#39;s Trace=0.162, F<sub>3,13</sub>=0.835, P=   0.498), for any of the variables: abundance, species richness   and equitability. Sampling order was non-significant either   (Pillai&#39;s Trace=0.415, F<sub>6,28</sub>=1.223, P=0.324), indicating no   effect of sampler experience: the repeated visits to the sites   did not lead to detection of more galls or gall types as time   went by. However, pooling samples reveals a different picture.   Sample-based rarefaction shows mesic riparian forests   having significantly more species (<a href="#(fig1)">Fig. 1A</a>) than xeric espinilho   savannah, and a steeper accumulation curve as well. The   individual-based rarefaction confirms a significantly higher   species richness for forests than savanna (<a href="#(fig1)">Fig. 1B</a>), and the   bootstrap shows forests to have significantly higher equitabilities   for gallers than savanna (<a href="#(fig1)">Fig. 1C</a>).</font></p>        <p align="center"><a name="(fig1)"><img src="img/revistas/rcen/v37n1/v37n1a20fig1.gif" /></a></p>      <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Of the 59 galling morphospecies, only 16 were common   to the two vegetation types, 33 were exclusive to the forest   and 10 to the savanna. The qualitative comparison of species   composition (Simpson index) shows two separate clouds   for the vegetation types but two riparian forest samples close   to the savannah cloud (<a href="#(fig2)">Fig. 2A</a>). When a quantitative index   is used (Morisita), the result is analogous but now the two   clouds slightly overlap each other (<a href="#(fig2)">Fig. 2B</a>). With samples   pooled for each site, both indexes show quite separate clouds   (<a href="#(fig2)">Fig. 2C, D</a>), with espinilho sites quite close together. The   ANOSIM tests confirm the above picture of vegetation type   as the important factor segregating sites in terms of species composition to be statistically significant (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v37n1/v37n1a20tab1.gif" target="_blank">Table 1</a>) for both   individual and pooled samples, for both qualitative and quantitative   indexes.</font></p>        ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a name="(fig2)"><img src="img/revistas/rcen/v37n1/v37n1a20fig2.gif" /></a></p>        <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Of the 15 host plant families, only eight appeared on the   savanna, whilst all appeared in the forests. Considering host   species, 22 were found in the forest and only 11 in the savanna.   Host plant family and host plant species composition   with samples pooled for each site returns the same picture as   for the gallers above, with visible (<a href="#(fig3)">Fig. 3</a>) and significant differences   between the two types of vegetation (<a href="img/revistas/rcen/v37n1/v37n1a20tab1.gif" target="_blank">Table 1</a>). The   analyses at the sample level (no pooled samples) were very   similar in pattern and values and are thus not shown, there   were clear differences between vegetation types, although   not between sites, as happened for gallers. The Mantel tests   revealed a high correlation between site similarity for galling   species and for host plant families (R<sup>2</sup>= 0.654; P=0.008) and   a very high correlation for galling species and for host plant   species (R2=0.969; P&lt;0.001), as expected.</font></p>     <p align="center"><a name="(fig3)"><img src="img/revistas/rcen/v37n1/v37n1a20fig3.gif" /></a></p>      <p> <font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Discussion</b></font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Most information on arthropod galler diversity come from   species richness gathered from local samples, even for different   research groups, for example Fernandes and Price (1991),   Yukawa <i>et al</i>. (2001), Blanche (2000); that is, sampled sites   are visited only once and data on species richness are considered   only without gall counting or identifying galls, gallers   or host plants across sites. The easy standardisation of galler   sampling has allowed a comparative global picture of local   species richness to emerge (Price <i>et al</i>. 1998), which lead to   interesting questions and raised a debate on the processes behind   the pattern (Mendon&#231;a 2001; Ribeiro 2002). However,   biodiversity data are difficult to scrutinize and many different   avenues for analysis exist. Here it is shown how different   statistical treatments can lead to contrasting answers to the   same question; most work on gallers cannot employ samplebased   or individual-based methods, because of this sampling   method issue.  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Although for samples considered as units no differences   were detected for either arthropod galler species richness,   overall abundance or community equitability between two   contrasting adjacent vegetation formations, the pooling methods   showed these differences to exist. The mesic riparian forest   has more species of arthropod gallers and equitabilities   were higher for these galler communities than for adjacent   xeric espinilho savannah. The latter can be attributed to the   strong dominance exerted by the Eryophid species in espinilho,   an unreported pattern perhaps common to xeric vegetation   types. Data on overall abundance and relative abundance   among species (equitability) are rare in the gall-inducer literature,   and this paper probably constitutes the first analytical   comparison of these variables in diversity studies.  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Under the hygrothermal stress hypothesis (Price <i>et al</i>.   1998), the expectation would be for xeric sites to be richer   in species and higher in abundance, but no hypothesis on arthropod   galler diversity attempts to predict patterns for community   equitability. Not only the expectation of the above   hypothesis was not met at the scale the prediction is made (local   diversity), it was reversed for the pooled data, with more   species in the mesic environment.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">The remaining question is the generality of this pattern   for arthropod gallers, an apparent paradox raised by Mendon&#231;a   (2001) in which xeric sites could have more species &quot;locally&quot;   but not &quot;regionally&quot;. This led Esp&iacute;rito-Santo and Fernandes   (2007) to predict that tropical forests would probably   have in a large scale more species of gallers than savannas or   equivalent xeric tropical vegetation formations, although on   a very local scale the latter are richer. This equates to saying   that alpha diversity is high but beta diversity is low for xeric   sites compared to mesic environments. There are increasing   amounts of data on mostly mesic tropical systems showing   beta diversity to be lower than expected for insect herbivores   (e.g. Novotny <i>et al</i>. 2007): if gallers can be shown to consistently   have high beta diversity on mesic tropical sites this   would be in contrast to these other tropical herbivores.</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> The results for host plants indicate that plant richness is   also a component of the pattern found. Although no standardised   plant survey was employed to demonstrate differences   in plant richness on the sampled sites, there are large   differences in family and species richness of host plants between   vegetation types. The literature also indicates riparian   forests to be richer (Galvani and Baptista 2003), but no   standardised methods were used in this case either. These   data seem to support the plant richness hypothesis in this   case.  </font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana">Gall morphotyping across sites requires a more intense   sampling effort, but it also allows analysis of beta diversity,   that is, comparisons of the species composition of the sites   and vegetation types besides species richness. The analysis of   similarity showed species composition to significantly differ   between vegetation types at the two scales used here, with   sites in the espinilho savannah quite similar among themselves.   This may seem obvious given that there are always   differences in plant composition among vegetation types, as   detected in the Mantel test. Compositional differences between   vegetation types can be interpreted either as differences   in galls or in host plants, but nevertheless they demonstrate   that the differences detected for galling species richness are   not due to differential environment preference, as suggested   by Fernandes and Price (1988). These authors demonstrated   that in six insect gall-inducing species most perform better on   hygrothermical stressed plants, and thus they suggested female   preference for xeric sites as one possible mechanism to   explain the higher richness of gallers on xeric sites. However,   in the case presented here the difference in galler species   composition between the two vegetation types contradicts the   idea of a single galler species pool with most species having   a preference for xeric sites, that is, an ecological process as   chance or directional dispersal may not be involved.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> Developing a spatially and temporally multi-scale perspective   on arthropod galler species richness and other diversity   variables such as overall community abundance and   equitability is perhaps a necessary step in the direction of a   better understanding of the ecological patterns of these organisms.   Since complete taxonomic identification would be   too cumbersome for wide scale work, especially in the Neotropics,   using at least explicitly defined morphospecies at all   scales would also allow a deeper exploration of beta diversity   patterns, largely unknown. Analyses at larger spatial scales   than those used here may also help to define which processes   may be responsible for these patterns, generating more insights   into speciation and colonisation/extinction dynamics.</font></p>     <p> <font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Acknowledgements</b></font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"> I would like to thank Helena Romanowski and the people of   the entomology laboratories of UFRGS for help in the field   and lab and for useful discussions. Sincere thanks to G. Wilson   Fernandes for helpful comments on an earlier version of   this paper. Thanks to ProDoc-CAPES and CNPq (Brazilian   National Science Council) for funding. This is contribution   no. 495 to Departamento de Zoologia, UFRGS.</font></p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  Cited Literature</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <!-- ref --><p>  BLANCHE, K.R. 2000. Diversity of insect-induced galls along a   temperature-rainfallgradient in the tropical savannah region of the Northern Territory, Australia. Austral Ecology 25: 311-318.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000047&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  BLANCHE, K.R.; LUDWIG, J.A. 2001. Species richness of gallinducing   insects and host plants along an altitudinal gradient in   Big Bend National Park, Texas. American Midland Naturalist 145: 219-232.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000048&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  CLARKE, K.R.; GREEN, R.H. 1998. Statistical design and analysis   for a &quot;biological effects&quot; study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 46: 213-226.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000049&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  COLWELL, R.K. 2005. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species   richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.0 Internet.   Storrs (CT): University of Connecticut; cited 2009 Jun 10 Available from: <a href="http://purl.oclc.org" target="_blank">http://purl.oclc.org/estimates/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000050&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  CUEVAS-REYES, P.; SIEBE, C,; MART&Iacute;NEZ-RAMOS, M.;   OYAMA, K. 2003. Species richness of gall-forming insects in   tropical rain forest: correlations with plant diversity and soil fertility. Biodiversity &amp; Conservation 12: 411-422.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000051&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  CUEVAS-REYES, P.; QUESADA, M.; HANSON, P.; DIRZO, R.;   OYAMA, K. 2004. Diversity of gall-inducing insects in a Mexican   tropical dry forest: the importance of plant species richness,   life-forms, host plant age and plant density. Journal of Ecology 92: 707-716.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000052&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  DALBEM, R.V.; MENDON&#231;A, M. DE S., Jr. 2006. Diversity of   galling arthropods and host plants in subtropical forests of Porto Alegre, southern Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 35: 616-624.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000053&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  ESP&Iacute;RITO-SANTO, M.M.; FERNANDES, G.W. 2007. How many   species of gall-inducing insects are there on Earth, and where   are they? Annals of the Entomological Society of America 100: 95-99.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000054&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  FERNANDES, G.W.; PRICE, P.W. 1988. Biogeographical gradients   in gall-inducing species richness. Tests of hypotheses. Oecologia 76: 161-167.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000055&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  FERNANDES, G.W.; PRICE, P.W. 1991. Comparison of tropical   and temperate gall-inducing species richness: the roles of environmental   harshness and plant nutrient status. In: Price PW, Lewinsohn   TM, Fernandes GW, Benson WW (eds) Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions. New York (NY); John Wiley and Sons, p. 91-115.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000056&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  FERNANDES, G.W.; PRICE, P.W. 1992. The adaptive significance   of insect gall distribution: survivorship of species in xeric and mesic habitats. Oecologia 90: 14-20.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000057&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  FERNANDES, G.W.; JULI&Atilde;O, G.R.,; ARAUJO, R.C.; ARAUJO,   S.C.; LOMBARDI, J.A.; NEGREIROS, D.; CARNEIRO, M.A.   2001. Distribution and morphology of insect galls of the Rio Doce Valley, Brazil. Naturalia 26: 211-244.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000058&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  FERNANDES, G.W.; VARELA, O.; BUCHER, E.H.; CHANI,   J.M.; ECHEVARRIA, A.L.; ESP&Iacute;RITO-SANTO, M.M.; LIMA,   J.; NEGREIROS, D.; TOLEDO, C.S. 2002. Gall-forming insects   on woody and herbaceous plant species of the semi-arid chaco forest, Argentina. Lundiana 3: 20-30.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000059&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  GALVANI, F.R.; BAPTISTA, L.R. DE M. 2003. Flora do Parque   Estadual do Espinilho - Barra do Quara&iacute;/RS. Revista da Faculda de   Zoot&eacute;cnica Veterin&aacute;ria e Agron&ocirc;mica de Uruguaiana 10: 148-168.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000060&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  GON&#231;ALVES-ALVIM, S.J.; FERNANDES, G.W. 2001a. Biodiversity   of gall-inducing insects: historical, community and habitat   effects in four neotropical savannas. Biodiversity &amp; Conservation 10: 79-98.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000061&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  GON&#231;ALVES-ALVIM, S.J.; FERNANDES, G.W. 2001b. Comunidade   de insetos galhadores (Insecta) em diferentes fisionomias   do cerrado em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 18(suppl. 1): 289-305.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000062&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  GOTELLI, N.; COLWELL, R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity:   Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379-391.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000063&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  HAMMER, &Oslash;., HARPER, D.A.T.; RYAN, P.D. 2001. PASt: Paleontological   Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 9 pp.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000064&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  HUBBELL, S.P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity   and Biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology no. 32, 1st ed. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000065&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  KOLEFF, P.; GASTON, K. J.; LENNON, J. J. 2003. Measuring beta   diversity for presence -absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 367-382.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000066&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  LEGENDRE, P.; LEGENDRE, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000067&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  MENDON&#231;A, M. DE S.; Jr. 2001. Gall-inducing insect diversity   patterns: the resource synchronisation hypothesis. Oikos 95: 171-176.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000068&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  NOVOTNY, V.; MILLER, S.E.; HULCR, J.; DREW, R.A.I.; BASSET,   Y.; JANDA, M.; SETLIFF, G.P.; DARROW, K.; STEWART,   A.J.A.; AUGA, J.; ISUA, B.; MOLEM, K.; MANUMBOR, M.; TAMTIAI, E.; MOGIA, M. WEIBLEN, G.D. 2007.Low beta diversity of herbivorous insects in tropical forests. Nature 448: 692-697.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000069&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  OLSON, D.M.; DINERSTEIN, E.; WIKRAMANAYAKE, E.D.;   BURGESS, N.D.; POWELL, G.V.N.; UNDERWOOD, E.C.;   D&#39;AMICO, J.A.; ITOUA, I.; STRAND, H.E.; MORRISON,   J.C.; LOUCKS, C.J.; ALLNUTT, T.F.; RICKETTS, T.H.;   KURA, Y.; LAMOREUX, J.F.; WETTENGEL, W.W.; HEDAO,   P.; KASSEM, K.R. 2001. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth. BioScience 51: 933-938.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000070&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  PRICE, P.W.; FERNANDES, G.W.; LARA, A.C.F.; BRAWN, J.;   BARRIOS, H.; WRIGHT, M.G.; RIBEIRO, S.P.; ROTHCLIFF,   N. 1998. Global patterns in local number of insect gall-inducing species. Journal of Biogeography 25: 581-591.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000071&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  RIBEIRO, S.P. 2002. Insect herbivores in the canopies of savannas   and rainforests: revisiting Fernandes and Price&#39;s Harsh Environment   hypothesis. In: Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S., Kitching,   R. (eds). Arthropods of Tropical Forests: Spatio-Temporal   Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy. Cambridge (MA); Cambridge University Press, p. 234-245.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000072&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="Verdana">SEMA (Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente) 2002. Unidades de Conserva&ccedil;&atilde;o: Parque Estadual do Espinilho Internet. Porto Alegre (RS):. Available from:<A HREF="http://www.sema.rs.gov.br/">http://www.sema.rs.gov.br/sema/html/bioconh9.htm</A></font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000073&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  TORTORELLI, L.A. 1956. Maderas y bosques Argentinos, 1st ed. Buenos Aires (BA): ACME Editora.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000074&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  VELDTMAN, R.; MCGEOCH, M.A. 2003. Gall forming insect   species richness along a non-scleromorphic vegetation rainfall   gradient in South Africa: the importance of plant community composition. Austral Ecology 28: 1-13.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000075&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  WRIGHT, M.G., SAMWAYS, M.J. 1996. Gall-insect species richness   in African Fynbos and Karoo vegetation: the importance of plant species richness. Biodiversity Letters 3: 151-155.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000076&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  WRIGHT, M.G.; SAMWAYS, M.J. 1998. Insect species richness   tracking plant species richness in a diverse flora: gall-insects in   the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Oecologia 115: 427- 433.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000077&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  YUKAWA, J.; TOKUDA, M.; UECHI, N.; SATO, S. 2001. Species   richness of galling arthropods in Manaus, Amazon and the surroundings   of the Iguassu Falls. Esakia 41: 11-15.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000078&pid=S0120-0488201100010002000032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BLANCHE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Diversity of insect-induced galls along a temperature-rainfallgradient in the tropical savannah region of the Northern Territory, Australia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Austral Ecology]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<numero>25</numero>
<issue>25</issue>
<page-range>311-318</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BLANCHE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LUDWIG]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Species richness of gallinducing insects and host plants along an altitudinal gradient in Big Bend National Park]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>145</volume>
<page-range>219-232</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eTexas Texas]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[American Midland Naturalist]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CLARKE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GREEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Statistical design and analysis for a "biological effects" study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Marine Ecology Progress Series]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<numero>46</numero>
<issue>46</issue>
<page-range>213-226</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COLWELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samplesVersion 8.0]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Storrs ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Connecticut]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CUEVAS-REYES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SIEBE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[OYAMA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Species richness of gall-forming insects in tropical rain forest: correlations with plant diversity and soil fertility]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biodiversity & Conservation]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>411-422</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CUEVAS-REYES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[QUESADA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HANSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DIRZO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[OYAMA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Diversity of gall-inducing insects in a Mexican tropical dry forest: the importance of plant species richness, life-forms, host plant age and plant density]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Ecology]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<numero>92</numero>
<issue>92</issue>
<page-range>707-716</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DALBEM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDONçA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Diversity of galling arthropods and host plants in subtropical forests of Porto Alegre, southern Brazil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Neotropical Entomology]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<numero>35</numero>
<issue>35</issue>
<page-range>616-624</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ESPÍRITO-SANTO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[How many species of gall-inducing insects are there on Earth, and where are they?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annals of the Entomological Society of America]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<numero>100</numero>
<issue>100</issue>
<page-range>95-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRICE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biogeographical gradients in gall-inducing species richness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<numero>76</numero>
<issue>76</issue>
<page-range>161-167</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRICE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparison of tropical and temperate gall-inducing species richness: the roles of environmental harshness and plant nutrient status]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Price]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lewinsohn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernandes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>91-115</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[John Wiley and Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRICE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The adaptive significance of insect gall distribution: survivorship of species in xeric and mesic habitats]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<numero>90</numero>
<issue>90</issue>
<page-range>14-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JULIÃO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ARAUJO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ARAUJO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LOMBARDI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEGREIROS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARNEIRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Distribution and morphology of insect galls of the Rio Doce Valley, Brazil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Naturalia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>26</numero>
<issue>26</issue>
<page-range>211-244</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VARELA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUCHER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CHANI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ECHEVARRIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ESPÍRITO-SANTO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LIMA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NEGREIROS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TOLEDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gall-forming insects on woody and herbaceous plant species of the semi-arid chaco forest, Argentina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lundiana]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>20-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GALVANI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAPTISTA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Flora do Parque Estadual do Espinilho - Barra do Quaraí/RS.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista da Faculdade Zootécnica Veterinária e Agronômica de Uruguaiana]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>148-168</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONçALVES-ALVIM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biodiversity of gall-inducing insects: historical, community and habitat effects in four neotropical savannas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biodiversity & Conservation]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>79-98</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONçALVES-ALVIM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comunidade de insetos galhadores (Insecta) em diferentes fisionomias do cerrado em Minas Gerais, Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Zoologia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>^s1</numero>
<issue>^s1</issue>
<supplement>1</supplement>
<page-range>289-305</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GOTELLI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COLWELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology Letters]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>379-391</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HAMMER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ø.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HARPER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.A.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RYAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[PASt: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Palaeontologia Electronica]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HUBBELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Monographs in Population Biology]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<edition>1</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Princeton ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Princeton University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KOLEFF]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GASTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LENNON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Measuring beta diversity for presence -absence data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Ecology]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>72</numero>
<issue>72</issue>
<page-range>367-382</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEGENDRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LEGENDRE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Numerical Ecology]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Amsterdam ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDONçA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gall-inducing insect diversity patterns: the resource synchronisation hypothesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oikos]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>95</numero>
<issue>95</issue>
<page-range>171-176</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NOVOTNY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MILLER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HULCR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DREW]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BASSET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JANDA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SETLIFF]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DARROW]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STEWART]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[AUGA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ISUA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOLEM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MANUMBOR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TAMTIAI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MOGIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WEIBLEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Low beta diversity of herbivorous insects in tropical forests]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nature]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<numero>448</numero>
<issue>448</issue>
<page-range>692-697</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[OLSON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DINERSTEIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WIKRAMANAYAKE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BURGESS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[POWELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.V.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[UNDERWOOD]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D'AMICO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ITOUA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STRAND]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MORRISON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LOUCKS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALLNUTT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RICKETTS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KURA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LAMOREUX]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WETTENGEL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HEDAO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KASSEM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BioScience]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>51</numero>
<issue>51</issue>
<page-range>933-938</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRICE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LARA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.C.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BRAWN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARRIOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WRIGHT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIBEIRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROTHCLIFF]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Global patterns in local number of insect gall-inducing species]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Biogeography]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<numero>25</numero>
<issue>25</issue>
<page-range>581-591</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RIBEIRO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Insect herbivores in the canopies of savannas and rainforests: revisiting Fernandes and Price&#39;s Harsh Environment hypothesis.]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Basset]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Novotny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kitching]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Arthropods of Tropical Forests: Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy. Cambridge (MA)]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>234-245</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Unidades de Conservação: Parque Estadual do Espinilho]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Porto Alegre ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TORTORELLI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Maderas y bosques Argentinos]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<edition>1</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ACME Editora]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[VELDTMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MCGEOCH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gall forming insect species richness along a non-scleromorphic vegetation rainfall gradient in South Africa: the importance of plant community composition]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Austral Ecology]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>28</numero>
<issue>28</issue>
<page-range>1-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WRIGHT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SAMWAYS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gall-insect species richness in African Fynbos and Karoo vegetation: the importance of plant species richness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biodiversity Letters]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>151-155</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WRIGHT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SAMWAYS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Insect species richness tracking plant species richness in a diverse flora: gall-insects in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<numero>115</numero>
<issue>115</issue>
<page-range>427- 433</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[YUKAWA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TOKUDA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[UECHI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SATO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Species richness of galling arthropods in Manaus, Amazon and the surroundings of the Iguassu Falls]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Esakia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>41</numero>
<issue>41</issue>
<page-range>11-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
