VIVIANE S. ALVES¹, PEDRO M. J. DE O. NEVES², LUIS F. A. ALVES³, ALCIDES MOINO Jr.⁴ and NICOLE HOLZ⁵

Received: 20-oct-2011 - Accepted: 9-may-2012

Key words: Biological control. Animal husbandry. Poultry farming. Isolate selection.

Resumen: Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), es una importante plaga de aviarios de difícil control en función de sus hábitos y de la dificultad del uso de insecticidas sintéticos. Sin embargo, los nemátodos entomopatógenos tienen potencial como una alternativa para el control de éste insecto. El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar el aislado de nemátodo entomopatógeno más eficiente para su utilización en el control de adultos de A. diaperinus. Fueron evaluados 14 aislamientos, y para aquel que presentó mejor virulencia fueran estimadas la DL₅₀ y DL₉₀, como la eficiencia del nemátodo en diferentes temperaturas (18, 22, 26, 30 y 35°C), sobre adultos del insecto. Se evaluó también para esto el efecto de la cama de aviario y de productos sanitarios sobre los nemátodos. Los 14 aislamientos evaluados fueron patogénicos con valores de mortalidad que variaron de 1 a 99%. Steinernema arenarium fue el más eficiente causando 99% de mortalidad. La LC90 estimada fue de 106 JI/insecto (aproximadamente 25JI/cm²). Se observó que temperaturas superiores a 30°C no fueron viables para los nemátodos y la cama de aviário presentó efecto antagonista a la acción del mismo, siendo su acción totalmente nula sobre adultos, y reduciendo 57% la eficiencia sobre las larvas.

Palabras clave: Control biológico. Producción animal. Avicultura. Selección de aislados.

Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer, 1797) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), lesser mealworm, is one of the most and extremely harmful pests in poultry houses. It is mentioned as a vector of a role of diseases (Avian leukosis, Gumboro, Marek's, and Newcastle disease, smallpox, Avian influenza, coronavirus, and other bacterial diseases) (Watson et al. 2000; Chernaki-Leffer et al. 2002; Pinto et al. 2005; Vittori et al. 2007; Hazeleger et al. 2008; Chinivasagam et al. 2010; Abreu et al. 2011). Besides, the mealworm attracts poultry, they are fed by the birds, resulting in reduced feed intake and consequent weight loss and production decreasing (Matias 1992; Japp 2010). Due to the hardness of the adult elytra, the birds digestive tract may be injured, favoring disease contamination and hampering nutrient uptake (Despins & Axtell 1995).

The cryptic behavior and the environmental conditions, which are usually unfavorable for the establishment of natural enemies, make the control of lesser mealworm difficult. Chemical control is most commonly used, but not always with success, since the alkalinity of the litter (due to the decomposition of uric acid into ammonia) deactivated chemical active ingredients, reducing the residual period and the control efficiency. In addition, the risk of contamination of poultry products and the possibility of emergence of resistant populations oppose a widespread use of this control method (Matias 1992; Steelman 1996; Chernaki Leffer 2004).

However, some poultry management techniques can contribute to reduce the insect population, e.g., litter piling, covering the litter during lot intervals causing insect death by ammonia and CO₂ release; litter change in short time intervals and litter treatment at temperatures below 17°C may reduce the insect population (Chernaki-Leffer et al. 2001).

Regarding biological control, there are evidences of the occurrence of fungi on lesser mealworm adults, both in Brazil and the USA (Steinkraus et al. 1991; Alves et al. 2004;Alves et al. 2005a). However, most studies were realized in the laboratory (Geden & Steinkraus 2003; Oliveira 2005; Rohde et al. 2006; Chernaki-Leffer 2007).

On the other hand, it has been demonstrated under laboratory conditions that there is a potential for use of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN), of the genera Steinernema spp. and Heterorhabditis spp., to the control of A. diaperinus (Geden et al. 1985; Szalanski et al 2004; Alves et al. 2005b).

Studies data in the field are scarce, but the few existing studies indicate the possibility of a successful control of lesser mealworm by EPN strains (Geden et al. 1987; Rodrigueiro et al. 2008).

Isolate selection. The isolates were obtained from the collection of entomopathogens of the laboratory of insect pathology, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) and the Instituto Biologico de Sao Paulo.

Nematodes multiplication was performed in vivo, using last-instar larvae of Galleria mellonella L., as described by Poinar (1979). After the production, the infective juveniles (IJ) were collected and stored in Erlenmeyer flasks at 16°C in aqueous suspension for at the most one week before use in the experiments.

Fourteen isolates of EPN belonging to the genera Heterorhabditis and Steinernema (Table 1) were evaluated on A. diaperinus adults, using a methodology adapted by Rohde et al. (2006) and Alves et al. (2005b).

The insects were collected periodically from commercial poultry houses, and maintained at laboratory conditions in plastic containers with perforated cover, along with chicken litter and food, in 26 ± 1°C, and natural photoperiod. Adults with good mobility were selected for the bioassays.

The isolates were screened in a Petri dish (diameter 9 cm), lined with double sterilized filter paper at the bottom, where the EPN was applied at a concentration of 100 IJ/cm², suspended in 2 ml of distilled sterilized water (the control treatment in water only). So, 15 adults were placed on each plate along with a small amount of sterilized chicken feed.

The experiment was performed under controlled conditions (25 ± 1 °C, RH of 70 ± 10%, in the dark), and evaluated on the 5^th day after installation. The dead insects were counted and dissected to confirm death by the nematode.

The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized block design, with four replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the means test of Scott-Knott (P < 0.05), using the software package SISVAR (Ferreira 2003).

The test was conducted with 15 adults in a Petri dish (9 cm diameter), and nine nematodes concentrations were evaluated: 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 IJ/insect were evaluated. In the plates 2 ml of nematodes suspension in distilled water and to each concentration were applied in four plates. LC₅₀ and LC₉₀ were determined by the Probit analysis using the Polo-PC program, according to Haddad (1998). Furthermore, the data were submitted to polynomial regression analysis.

Effect of temperature and poultry house litter. The pathogenicity of S. arenarium on adult insects was evaluated at five temperatures: 18, 22, 26, 30 and 35°C, according to the methodology described above for the isolated selection. Each treatment was repeated four times, in a completely randomized design. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and the mean test by Scott-Knott, using the statistical program SISVAR (P ≤ 5%) (Ferreira 2003). Data were also submitted to regression analysis to estimate the optimum temperature range for insect mortality on the 5^th day caused by EPN action, to establish a curve of the nematode activity decrease with increasing (or decreasing) temperature.

To evaluate the litter effect, the experiment was performed using plastic containers of 20 x 15 x 15 cm (length x width x height) lined with a layer of hydrophilic cotton (1 cm) and immediately moistened with 30 ml of distilled water. A sheet of filter paper was placed on the bottom and then 200 g of sterile soil. The soil was inoculated with the nematode at a concentration of 100 IJ/cm² (the control with distilled, sterilized water only). Then 50 g poultry litter was added and the insects were released (50 insects/pot).

The influence of litter on the entomopathogenic activity of EPN on larvae and adults was evaluated, and a control treatment was conducted for each insect life stage. Each treatment was repeated four times, totaling 16 plots, arranged in a completely randomized design. The pots were covered with voile and maintained under controlled conditions (25 ± 1°C, 12 h photophase). Every three days, 30 ml of water was added to the containers to keep the humidity. Seven days after application, the number of dead insects was counted and the data were subjected to analysis of variance and the means to the test of Scott-Knott, using the software package SISVAR (Ferreira 2003).

Isolates selection. All isolates were pathogenic, with variations in virulence, with mortality levels between 1.0 and 99.0%. Steinernema arenarium with 99.0% was the highest virulence and it was chosen to continue in the following experiments due to its high activity (Table 2).

In a study conducted by Alves et al. (2005b) the pathogenicity of S. carpocapsae and S. glaseri for this insect was evaluated by immersion in aqueous suspension containing the nematodes. However, the mortality values did not exceed 48%, emphasizing the importance of evaluating a large number of isolates, as in this study, where in spite of the nonsignificant mortality of some isolates, others were very efficient, reaching up to 99% adult mortality.

Geden et al. (1985) and Szalanski et al. (2004) evaluating the pathogenicity of different EPN isolates on A. diaperinus adults, also pointed out that the variation in mortality obtained was rather significant, highlighting the importance of selection.

In another bioassay with S. carpocapsae and S. feltiae isolates, to control A. diaperinus adults, LC₅₀ was estimated between 1.5 and 77 IJ/insect for S. carpocapsae isolates, and 4.2 to 62 IJ/insect for S. feltiae isolates, indicating great variation between the different tested isolates (Szalanski et al. 2004).

Since the values found in this study are similar to data from the studies mentioned, the use of S. arenarium may be viable for the control of A. diaperinus. It is noteworthy that in the present study assessments were performed with adults only, because in preliminary studies, larvae were always more susceptible than adults, so that the virulence found for adults will be repeated in tests with larvae (Geden et al. 1985; Szalanski et al. 2004; Alves et al. 2005b).

On the other hand, the concentration determined in the laboratory may not be suitable under field conditions where the number of uncontrolled factors is greater and at laboratory conditions, the insect is directly exposed to the pathogen, whereas under field conditions the nematode is exposed to a series of deleterious factors such as temperature and humidity, apart from having to search for the host (Alves et al. 2009).

Effect of temperature and poultry house litter. It was observed that at temperatures of 18.22 and 26°C the percentage of mortality caused by the nematode was 72.71 and 68% respectively, with no significant differences. Besides, the temperatures of 30 and 34°C interfered significantly with the results, so that there was no mortality in these two treatments (Fig. 2).

Similarly, Geden & Axtell (1988) observed that the efficiency of S. feltiae on A. diaperinus adults was reduced at higher temperatures and that the effect was accumulative, increasing during the evaluation period and the best results were obtained at 20 and 24°C (mortality 84 and 100%, respectively) in the first two weeks of evaluation.

The negative effect of high temperature on the EPN action was confirmed in a study of Szczepanik (2000), with S. feltiae and H. bacteriophora isolates at 30°C, who observed a significant reduction in the efficiency of both nematodes with maximum values of 5 and 50% mortality, respectively.

No effect of poultry litter on adult mortality was observed, with no difference compared to control. For the treatment with larvae, the mortality was 43% (Table 3).

Geden et al. (1985) evaluated the effect of litter on the virulence of S. feltiae and H. heliothidis and observed a considerable increase of LC50 under the conditions described above (LC50 for adults was 42 IJ/insect in the laboratory and 971 IJ/insect in litter), corroborating the data in this study.

The variation of the physicochemical and microbial litter of poultry over the period of accommodation is quite evident. It is known that ammonia may have fungistatic effect and that it acts by inhibiting the growth of entomopathogenic fungi in this environment (Bacon 1986; Alves et al. 2008).

However, the effect of ammonia on EPN is unknown, but it is believed that it can influence the EPN metabolism, interfering with the efficiency of lesser mealworm control. This reinforces the need for integration of the nematode in a control strategy of the insect population, as mentioned above.

Although studies searching alternatives for the control of the lesser mealworm are still at an early stage, it can be said that factors such as environmental conditions and other techniques adopted in the poultry management can interfere with the nematode action. Knowledge about the possible interactions when using the nematode in poultry farming must therefore be acquired.

These results suggest that the use of EPN to control A. diaperinus in the field may be unfeasible, since temperatures above 30°C are quite common, mainly in the summer. Therefore, the use of EPN has to be part of the population of lesser mealworm management. It could for example be applied when exchanging the poultry litter, onto the soil, to control the insects both in the larva and pupa, as well as adult stages. The nematode inoculation could thereby be increased, contributing to the insect control at every new cycle of poultry production.

It is possible to conclude that these agents can potentially control the insect pest, despite the need for field studies to compare poultry management strategies involving EPN.

Acknowledgements

We thank "Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)" for financial support.

Literature cited

ABREU, V. M. N.; PAIVA, D. P.; ABREU, P. G.; COLDEBELLA, A. 2011. Evaluation of litter material and ventilation systems in poultry production: III. Litter reuse, darkling beetle populations and intestinal parasites. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40: 1372-1380.         [ Links ]

ALVES, L. F. A.; ALVES, V. S.; BRESSAN, D. F.; NEVES, P. M. O. J.; ALVES, S. B. 2004. Ocorréncia de Metharizium anisopliae (Metsch) Sorok. Em adultos de cascudinho (Alphitobius diaperinus) (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) em aviarios comerciais em Cascavel, PR. Neotropical Entomology 33: 793-795.         [ Links ]

ALVES, L. F. A.; GASSEN, M. H.; PINTO, F. G. S.; NEVES, P. M. O. J.; ALVES, S. B. 2005a. Ocorréncia natural de Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuilleman (Moliniales: Moniliaceae) sobre o cascudinho (Alphitobius diaperinus) (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), em aviario comercial em Cascavel, PR. Neotropical Entomology 34: 507-510.         [ Links ]

ALVES, L. F. A.; ROHDE, C.; ALVES, V. S. 2005b. Patogenicidade de Steinernema glaseri e S. carpocapsae (Nematoda: Rhabdita) contra o cascudinho, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Neotropical Entomology 34: 139-141.         [ Links ]

ALVES, L. F. A.; NEVES, P. M.O. J.; OLIVEIRA, R. C.; OLIVEIRA, D. G. P. 2008. Fatores a serem considerados na utilizacäo de Beauveria bassiana visando o manejo de populacöes de Alphitobius diaperinus em aviarios comerciais. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 75: 13-20.         [ Links ]

ALVES, V. S.; MOINO, JR. A.; SANTA-CECILIA, L. V. C.; ANDALÓ, V.; SOUZA, G. C. 2009. Patogenicidade de nematóides entomopatogènicos a cochonilha-da-raiz-do-cafeeiro Dysmicoccus texensis (Tinsley) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) em laboratório. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 76: 67-73.         [ Links ]

BACON, C. W. 1986. Effects of broiler litter volatiles and ammonia on fungal spore germination. Poultry Science 65: 710-716.         [ Links ]

CHERNAKI-LEFFER, A. M. 2004. Dinàmica populacional, estimative da resistencia a inseticidas e suscetibilidade do cascudinho Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer, 1797) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) a inseticidas reguladores de crescimento e a fungos entomopatogénicos. Tese (Pós-Graduacào em Ciencias Biológicas) - Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR. 128 p.         [ Links ]

CHERNAKI-LEFFER, A. M.; LAZZARI, F. A.; LAZZARI, S. M. N.; ALMEIDA, L. M. 2001. Controle do cascudinho. Avicultura Industrial 1094: 22-25.         [ Links ]

CHERNAKI-LEFFER, A. M.; BIESDORF, S. M.; ALMEIDA, L. M.; LEFFER, E. V. B.; VIGNE, F. 2002. Isolamento de entero-bactérias em Alphiobius diaperinus e na cama de aviarios no oeste do estado do Paraná, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avícola 4: 243-247.         [ Links ]

CHERNAKI-LEFFER, A. M.; SOSA-GOMEZ, D. R.; ALMEIDA, L. M. 2007. Selection for entomopathogenic fungi and LD50 of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. for the Lesser Mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avícola 9: 209-213.         [ Links ]

CHINIVASAGAM, H.N., REDDING, M., RUNGE, G., BLACKALL, P. J. 2010. Presence and incidence of food-borne pathogens in australian chicken litter. British Poultry Science 51: 311-318.         [ Links ]

DESPINS, J. L.; AXTELL, R. C. 1995. Feeding behavior and growth of broiler chicks fed larvae of the darkling beetle, Alphitobius diaperinus. Poultry Science 74 (2): 331-336.         [ Links ]

FERREIRA, D. F. 2003. Manual do sistema Sisvar para análises estatisiticas. Disponível em: http://www.dex.ufla.br/danielff/sis-varmanual.pdf [Review date: 25 apr 2006]         [ Links ].

GEDEN, C. J.; ARENDS, J. J.; BROOKS, W. M. 1985. Susceptibility of the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleptera: Tenebrionidae) to the entomogenous nematodes Steinernema feltiae, S. glaseri (Steinernematidae) and Heterorhabditis heliothidis (Heterorhabditidae). Journal of Entomology Science 20:331-339.         [ Links ]

GEDEN, C. J.; ARENDS, J. J.; AXTELL, R. C. 1987. Field trials of Steinernema feltiae (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) for control of Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in commercial broiler and turkey houses. Journal of Economic Entomology 80: 136-141.         [ Links ]

GEDEN, C. J.; AXTELL, R. C. 1988. Effect of temperature on nematode (Steinernema feltiae [Nematoda: Steinernematidae]) treatment of soil for control of lesser mealworm (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in turkey houses. Journal of Economic Entomology 81:800-803.         [ Links ]

GEDEN, C. J.; STEINKRAUS, D. C. 2003. Evaluation of three formulations of Beauveria bassiana for control of lesser mealworm and hide beetle in Georgia poultry houses. Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 1602-1607.         [ Links ]

HADDAD, M. L., 1998. Utilizacäo do Polo-PC para análise de Probit. pp. 999-1013. In: Alves, S. B. (Ed.). Controle microbiano de insetos. FEALQ, Piracicaba.         [ Links ]

HAZELEGER, W. C.; BOLDER, N. M.; BEUMER, R. R.; JACOBS-REITSMA, W. F. 2008. Darkling beetles (Alphitobius diaperinus) and their larvae as potential vectors for the transfer of Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella enteric serovar paratyphi B variant java between successive broiler flocks. Applied Environmental Microbiology 74: 6887-6891.         [ Links ]

JAAP, A. K.; BICHO, C. L.; SILVA, A.V F. 2010. Importancia e medidas de controle de Alphitobius diaperinus em aviarios. Ciencia Rural 40: 1668-1673.         [ Links ]

MATIAS, R. S. 1992. Controle de Alphitobius diaperinus em piso e cama de aviários. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 27: 205-207.         [ Links ]

OLIVEIRA, R. C. 2005. Influencia do substrato e a utilizacäo de armadilhas com Beauveria bassiana e inseticida no controle de Alphitobius diaperinus. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Estadual de Londrina - UEL. 66 p.         [ Links ]

PINTO, D. M.; RIBEIRO, P. B.; BERNARDI, E. 2005. Flutuacào populacional de Alphitobius diaperinus_(Panzer, 1979) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), capturados por armadilhas do tipo sanduíche, em granja avícola, no municipio de Pelotas, RS. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 72: 199-203.         [ Links ]

POINAR, G. O. Jr. 1979. Nematodes for biological control of insects. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.         [ Links ]

RODRIGUEIRO, T. S. C.; GINARETE, C. M. A.; LEITE, L. G.; TAVARES, F. M.; GOULART, R. M.; GIACOMETTI, F. H. C.2008. Eficiencia de Heterorhabditis indica IBCB-N05 (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) no controle de Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) sob comedouros de granja avícola. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 75: 279-284.         [ Links ]

ROHDE, C.; ALVES, L. F. A.; NEVES, P. M. O. J.; ALVES, S. B.; DA SILVA, E. R. L.; ALMEIDA, J. E. M. 2006. Selecào de Isolados de Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. e Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. contra o Cascudinho Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Neotropical Entomology 35: 231-240.         [ Links ]

STEELMAN, D. 1996. Darkling beetles are costly pests. Poultry Digest 55: 22-23.         [ Links ]

STEINKRAUS, D. C.; GEDEN, C. J.; RUTZ, D. A. 1991. Susceptibility of lesser mealworm (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) to Beauveria bassiana (Moniliales: Moniliaceae): effects of host stage, substrate, formulation, and host passage. Journal of Medical Entomology 28: 314-321.         [ Links ]

SZALANSKI, A. L.; PALMER, T. W.; MCKAY, T.; STEELMAN, C. D. 2004. Infectivity of Steinernema spp. (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) to adult litter beetles, Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in the laboratory. Biocontrol Science Technology 14: 81-85.         [ Links ]

SZCZEPANIK, M. 2000. Temperature effects on the efficacy of nematodes against the lesser mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 69: 483-490.         [ Links ]

VITTORI, J.; SCHOCKEN-ITURRINO, R. P.; TROVÓ, K. P.; RIBEIRO, C. A. M.; BARBOSA, G. G.; SOUZA, L. M.; PIGATTO, C. P. 2007. Alphitobius diaperinus as a vector of Clostridium perfrigens in broiler houses in the state of Säo Paulo - Brazil. Ciència Rural 37: 894-896.         [ Links ]

WATSON, D. W.; GUY, J. S.; STRINGHAM, S. M. 2000. Limited transmission of turkey coronavirus in young turkeys by adult Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 37: 480-483.         [ Links ]