<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-0739</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Colombia Forestal]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Colomb. for.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-0739</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Proyecto Curricular de Ingeniería Forestal, Facultad del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-07392008000100003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[GROWTH OF TRANSPLANTED TIMBER SPECIES SEEDLINGS IN THE SOUTH OF THE COLOMBIAN AMAZON: A PRELIMINARY STUDY]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Crecimiento de plántulas trasplantadas de especies maderables en el sur de la Amazonia colombiana: un estudio preliminar]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Crescimento de espécies de mudas de madeiras transplantadas no sul do amazonas colombiano: estudo preliminar]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gruezmacher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mónica]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duivenvoorden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joost F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Tropenbos International Colombia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,IBED/Universiteit van Ámsterdam  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>35</fpage>
<lpage>43</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-07392008000100003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-07392008000100003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-07392008000100003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Two commonly used timber species in the area of Amacayacu National Park (Quararibea sp. and Minquartia guianensis) were selected to develop an experiment that compared the early performance of seedlings in mature and old secondary forest. We transplanted seedlings of these species into mature and secondary forest plots and observed height and diameter increments as well as mortality for a period of approximately 70 days. In situ seedling performance under parent trees in mature forests was measured as a control. The structure of both experimentalforestswasnotapparentlydifferent.We found similar seedling performance for both species in the two forests. However, the seedlings hardly showed any relative height or relative diameter increment in the short period of measurements. The results show that enriching secondary forests by means of transplanting seedlings from timber species might be a promising way of ecological restoration.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[En este trabajo se utilizaron plántulas de dos especies maderables comúnmente utilizadas (Quararibea sp. y Minquartia guianensis) para comparar su desempeño en bosques maduros y bosques secundarios en el sur de Colombia (Parque Nacional Amacayacu). Se trasplantaron las plántulas en cuatro parcelas de bosque maduro y cuatro de bosque secundario. Se tomaron mediciones periódicas de altura, diámetro y tasa de mortalidad, durante 70 días. El desempeño de las plántulas encontradas in situ bajo árboles parentales en bosque maduro se cuantificó a manera de control. La estructura de ambos bosques experimentales era similar. Las plántulas transplantadas se desempeñaron de forma parecida. Sin embargo, no se observaron incrementos del diámetro y la altura relativa en el período corto de las mediciones. Los resultados demuestran que el enriquecimiento de bosques secundarios con especies maderables es una forma de restauración ecológica prometedora.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Neste trabalho se utilizaram mudas de duas espécies de madeiras comumente utilizadas (Quararibea sp. e Minquartia guianensis) para comparar seu desempenho em bosques maduros e bosques secundários no sul da Colômbia (Parque Nacional Amacayacu). Se trasplantaram as mudas em quatro parcelas de bosque maduro e quatro de bosque secundário. Tomou-se medições periódicas da altura, diâmetro e taxa de mortalidade, durante 70 dias. O desempenho das mudas encontradas no local embaixo das árvores parentais no bosque maduro se quantificou a maneira de controle. A estrutura de ambos os bosques experimentais era semelhante. As mudas transplantadas se desempenharam de forma parecida. Entretanto, não se observaram incrementos do diâmetro e a altura relativa no período curto das medições. Os resultados demonstram que o enriquecimento de bosques secundários com espécies de madeira é uma forma de restauração ecológica prometedora.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Amacayacu National Park]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Colombia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[ecological restoration]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Minquartia guianensis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Quararibea sp.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[mature and secondary forests]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Parque Nacional Amacayacu]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Colombia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[restauración ecológica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Minquartia guianensis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Quararibea sp.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[bosques maduros y secundarios]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Parque Nacional Amacayacu]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Colômbia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[restauração ecológica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Minquartia guianensis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Quararibea sp.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[bosques maduros e secundários]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <FONT SIZE="2" FACE="VERDANA">      <P align="CENTER"><font size="4" face="VERDANA"><B>GROWTH OF TRANSPLANTED TIMBER SPECIES SEEDLINGS  IN THE SOUTH OF THE COLOMBIAN AMAZON: A PRELIMINARY STUDY</B></font></P>     <P align="CENTER"><font size="3" face="VERDANA"><B>Crecimiento de pl&aacute;ntulas trasplantadas de especies maderables en el sur de la Amazonia colombiana: un estudio preliminar</B></font></P>     <P align="CENTER"><font size="3" face="VERDANA"><B>Crescimento de esp&eacute;cies de mudas de madeiras transplantadas no sul do amazonas colombiano: estudo preliminar</B></font></P>  <FONT SIZE="2" FACE="VERDANA">      <P>Mónica Gruezmacher<SUP>1*</SUP> &amp; Joost F. Duivenvoorden<SUP>2</SUP></P>     <P><SUP>1</SUP>Tropenbos International Colombia, <A HREF="mailto:mogruez@yahoo.com">mogruez@yahoo.com</A>.      <BR><SUP>2</SUP>IBED/Universiteit van &Aacute;msterdam, <A HREF="mailto:j.f.duivenvoorden@uva.nl">j.f.duivenvoorden@uva.nl</A>.      <BR><SUP>*</SUP>Autor de correspondencia</P>      <P>Recepci&oacute;n: Agosto 8 de 2008/Aprobaci&oacute;n: Octubre 30 de 2008</P> <HR SIZE="1">     <P><B>ABSTRACT </B></P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>Two commonly used timber species in the area of Amacayacu National Park (<I>Quararibea  </I>sp<I>. </I>and <I>Minquartia guianensis</I>) were selected to develop an experiment that  compared the early performance of seedlings in mature and old secondary forest. We transplanted  seedlings of these species into mature and secondary forest plots and observed height and diameter  increments as well as mortality for a period of approximately 70 days. <I>In situ </I>seedling  performance under parent trees in mature forests was measured as a control. The structure of both  experimentalforestswasnotapparentlydifferent.We found similar seedling performance for both species  in the two forests. However, the seedlings hardly showed any relative height or relative diameter  increment in the short period of measurements. The results show that enriching secondary forests by  means of transplanting seedlings from timber species might be a promising way of ecological  restoration.</P>      <P><B><I>Key Words: </I></B>Amacayacu National Park, Colombia, ecological restoration, <I>Minquartia  guianensis, Quararibea </I>sp., mature and secondary forests.</P> <HR SIZE="1">     <P><B>RESUMEN </B></P>     <P>En este trabajo se utilizaron pl&aacute;ntulas de dos especies maderables com&uacute;nmente  utilizadas (<I>Quararibea </I>sp. y <I>Minquartia guianensis</I>) para comparar su desempe&ntilde;o  en bosques maduros y bosques secundarios en el sur de Colombia (Parque Nacional Amacayacu). Se  trasplantaron las pl&aacute;ntulas en cuatro parcelas de bosque maduro y cuatro de bosque  secundario. Se tomaron mediciones peri&oacute;dicas de altura, di&aacute;metro y tasa de  mortalidad, durante 70 d&iacute;as. El desempe&ntilde;o de las pl&aacute;ntulas encontradas  <I>in situ </I>bajo &aacute;rboles parentales en bosque maduro se cuantific&oacute; a manera de  control. La estructura de ambos bosques experimentales era similar. Las pl&aacute;ntulas  transplantadas se desempe&ntilde;aron de forma parecida. Sin embargo, no se observaron incrementos  del di&aacute;metro y la altura relativa en el per&iacute;odo corto de las mediciones. Los  resultados demuestran que el enriquecimiento de bosques secundarios con especies maderables es  una forma de restauraci&oacute;n ecol&oacute;gica prometedora.</P>      <P><B><I>Palabras clave:</I></B> Parque Nacional Amacayacu, Colombia, restauraci&oacute;n  ecol&oacute;gica, <I>Minquartia guianensis, Quararibea </I>sp., bosques maduros y secundarios.</P>   <HR SIZE="1">     <P><B>RESUMO</B></P>     <P>Neste trabalho se utilizaram mudas de duas esp&eacute;cies de madeiras comumente utilizadas (<I>Quararibea</I> sp. e <I>Minquartia guianensis</I>) para comparar seu desempenho em bosques maduros e bosques secund&aacute;rios no sul da Col&ocirc;mbia (Parque Nacional Amacayacu). Se trasplantaram as mudas em quatro parcelas de bosque maduro e quatro de bosque secund&aacute;rio. Tomou-se medi&ccedil;&otilde;es peri&oacute;dicas da altura, di&acirc;metro e taxa de mortalidade, durante 70 dias. O desempenho das mudas encontradas no local embaixo das &aacute;rvores parentais no bosque maduro se quantificou a maneira de controle. A estrutura de ambos os bosques experimentais era semelhante. As mudas transplantadas se desempenharam de forma parecida. Entretanto, n&atilde;o se observaram incrementos do di&acirc;metro e a altura relativa no per&iacute;odo curto das medi&ccedil;&otilde;es. Os resultados demonstram que o enriquecimento de bosques secund&aacute;rios com esp&eacute;cies de madeira &eacute; uma forma de restaura&ccedil;&atilde;o ecol&oacute;gica prometedora.</P>     <P><B><I>Palavras chave:</I></B> Parque Nacional Amacayacu, Col&ocirc;mbia, restaura&ccedil;&atilde;o ecol&oacute;gica, <i>Minquartia guianensis</i>, <i>Quararibea</i> sp., bosques maduros e secund&aacute;rios.</P> <HR SIZE="1">      <P><B>INTRODUCTION</B></P>     <P>In the Amazon region, rapid population expansion and increasing transformation of mature  (primary) forests into agricultural fields, has caused the area of secondary forest around  settlements to increase, driving local people to shorten the fallow period, as has been documented  for regions in Peru by Coomes <I>et al. </I>(2000). Shorter fallow periods will eventually degrade  the productivity of these secondary forests because they have no time to replenish, leading to what  has been described as the fallow or <I>barbecho </I>crisis (Smith <I>et al.</I> 2003).</P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>A useful alternative for people of this region is ecological restoration through forest  enrichment with timber species. This practice might accelerate natural regeneration and allow  to maintain sustain-ability and diversity of disturbed forests (Meffe <I>et al. </I>1997, Chinea  2002, Koslowski 2002). It might contribute to the persistence of secondary forests by recuperating  site productivity (Smith <I>et al. </I>2003) and generating a sustainable alternative for the local  people. Secondary forests can provide economical and ecological services that will relieve pressure  on mature forests and fulfill the living demands of local inhabitants (Smith <I>et al </I>1999,  Metzger 2002, Smith <I>et al</I>. 2003). However, the effects of land use history may still be  present in old secondary forests (Finegan 1996, Gomez-Pompa &amp; Burley 1991, Guariguata &amp;  Ostertag 2001) thus interfering with seedling performance (Benitez-Malvido <I>et al</I>. 2005).  The principal aim of the study here presented was to examine how transplanted seedlings of two  shade-tolerant canopy species used for timber in Colombian Amazonia were able to survive and grow  in secondary forests.</P>      <P><B>METHODS</B></P>      <P><B><I>STUDY SITE </I></B></P>     <P>The study area was located in the Amacayacu National Park&rsquo;s southern district (3&ordm;  50&rsquo;-3&ordm; 02&rsquo;S and 69&ordm; 54&rsquo;-70&ordm; 20&rsquo;W), the most accessible area  of the park (<A HREF="#FIG1">Figure 1</A>). The mean annual temperature in this area is around 26&ordm;C and relative  humidity is near 90% (Arbel&aacute;ez <I>et al</I>. 2008). Rainfall patterns are unimodal, showing  a rainy season between October and June when average monthly precipitation levels fluctuate around  350 mm and 500 mm. According to the system of K&ouml;ppen, the climate in the area classifies as  Afi (tropical, all months with rainfall above 60 mm). The physiography is dominated by medium size  hills, found at elevations below 200 m above sea level. Geologically, the area is built up by  Tertiary and Plio-Pleistocene sediments, and Quaternary alluvial deposits (Proradam 1979).</P>     <P>    <CENTER><A NAME="FIG1"></A><IMG SRC="img/revistas/cofo/v11n1/v11n1a03fig1.jpg"></CENTER></P>      <P><B><I>STUDIED SPECIES </I></B></P>      <P>We selected two of the mostly used timber species of terra firme forests in the Amacayacu area  (<I>Quararibea </I>sp<I>. </I>-local name Casta&ntilde;o -and <I>Minquartia guianensis -</I>local  name Acap&uacute;) to design the seedling transplantation experiment. <I>Quararibea </I>sp.  seedlings were defined as individuals between 10 and 70 cm. They showed abundant foliage and most  of them were still attached to the seed at the time of transplanting. <I>Minquartia guianensis  </I>seedlings were defined as individuals between 10 and 20 cm high. Seldom had these seedlings  more than four leaves, and the seed had gone completely at the time of transplanting. Seedlings  from both species were found abundantly and occurred widespread during the study period.</P>      <P><B><I>DATA COLLECTION </I></B></P>     <P>All seedlings were collected in mature forests. We assumed that they represented offspring from  the previous fruiting season. Transplantations were made into eight 12 x 12 m plots which were  established in the centre of four secondary and four mature forest sites. The secondary forests  represented areas of past agriculture which had stopped about 30 to 50 years ago. According to  local informants the mature forests had never been cut down. All plots were located in a total area  of approximately 8 km<SUP>2</SUP>, within a distance of 10 km from  the village settlements (<A HREF="#FIG1">Figure 1</A>).</P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>We transplanted a total of 552 seedlings, 274 in secondary forests and 278 in mature forests.  Seedlings were transported with a bulk of soil from the original site to prevent damage to the  root system. This soil was largely removed just before planting, carefully avoiding unneeded damage  to the roots. In each plot between 30 to 40 seedlings of both <I>Quararibea </I>sp. and  <I>Minquartia guianensis </I>were systematically planted into a grid of 1 x 1 m, at a depth of  approximately 20 cm.</P>      <P>Each seedling was monitored on a 10-day interval basis for a period of 70 days (between December  9 2004 and March 11 2005). Seedling height was measured to its apex with a metric tape. Its  diameter was measured to the nearest 0.01 mm at ground level, using plastic callipers. Seedlings  that had disappeared were considered to have died.</P>      <P>The performance of the transplanted seedlings was also compared with control seedlings growing  <I>in situ</I>. For this purpose, adult <I>Quararibea </I>sp. and <I>Minquartia guianensis </I> trees which showed abundant seedling progeny were selected in mature terra firme forests.  Within 0-10 m distance from each of these trees, 10 to 30 seedlings were marked, leading to a  total of 100 marked seedlings of <I>Quararibea </I>sp. and 62 marked seedlings of <I>Minquartia  guianensis. </I>The height and diameter was recorded for all marked seedlings in a similar way as  described for the transplanted seedlings, on a 10-day interval basis during a total period of 60  days (between January 31 2005 and March 31 2005).</P>      <P>In order to characterise the abiotic properties of both forest types (mature and secondary),  soil was sampled in all experimental plots by taking away the litter layer and using a garden spade  to collect the uppermost 20 cm of mineral soil. Samples were stored in a dry place and later  analyzed according to the standard procedures carried out at the soil laboratory of the  Geographical Institute &lsquo;Agust&iacute;n Codazzi&rsquo;. These analyses comprised granulometry  with a Boyoucous hydrometer, after dispersion with Na<SUB>2</SUB>P<SUB>2</SUB>O<SUB>7</SUB>;  pH (H<SUB>2</SUB>O) in a volumetric 1:1 soil:water solution; percentage of organic C, according  to the Walkley-Black method; exchangeable bases (cmol(+) mg soil) after extraction with 1 N  NH<SUB>4</SUB>OAc (pH = 7) with Ca and Mg complexed with EDTA, and Na and K measured by flame  photometry; and available P (mg per kg) by extraction with 0.1 N HCl and 0.13 N NH<SUB>4</SUB>F,  according to BrayII (IGAC 1990). Forest overstory density was estimated at the four corners of  each experimental plot through the use of a Model-C Spherical Densiometer. Also, the height and  diameter of all trees with DBH &gt;10 cm (DBH=Diameter at 130 cm height) in the plots was recorded.</P>      <P><B><I>DATA ANALYSIS</I></B></P>     <P>Seedling performance was based on mortality (number of dead individuals at the end of the  sampling period) and growth of surviving individuals. Estimates of growth were done by  relative height increase (RHI) and relative diameter increase (RDI) in the following way:</P>      <P align="CENTER">RHI or RDI = (t<SUB>6</SUB> - t<SUB>0</SUB>) / t<SUB>0</SUB></CENTER></P>     <P>in which t<SUB>6 </SUB>is the last recorded measurement and t<SUB>0</SUB> the first.</P>     <P>Differences between forest type regarding soil analyses and mortality rates were tested with  non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis). The effects of forest types on seedling growth was  tested by Nested Analysis of Variance (Zar 1996), in which plots were nested within forests.  Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests with Lilliefors significance correction were carried out to examine the  normality of the residuals of the ANOVA. If needed, response variables were log-transformed (after  being shifted into positive values) to reduce skewness. However, despite these transformations,  residuals in all ANOVA remained not-normal. Differences in growth between transplanted and <I>in  situ </I>seedlings were compared with Mann-Whitney tests. Analyses were carried out using SPSS  (version 11.0).</P>      <P><B>RESULTS</B></P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P><B><I>SOILS AND FOREST STRUCTURE </I></B></P>     <P>The average canopy openness or density was 93% in the mature forests and 94% in the  secondary forests. Mature forest showed a slightly larger diameter for trees of the same  height than secondary forests (<A HREF="#FIG2">Figure 2</A>; difference in regression coefficients was not tested).  Soil analyses hardly differed between the forest types (P&gt;0.05, Kruskal-Wallis tests for pH, Ca,  Mg, K, Na, P, and organic matter; <A HREF="#TAB1">Table 1</A>).</P>     <P>    <CENTER><A NAME="FIG2"></A><IMG SRC="img/revistas/cofo/v11n1/v11n1a03fig2.jpg"></CENTER></P>     <P>    <CENTER><A NAME="TAB1"></A><IMG SRC="img/revistas/cofo/v11n1/v11n1a03tab1.jpg"></CENTER></P>     <P><B><I>SEEDLING MORTALITY AND GROWTH </I></B></P>     <P>Regarding total numbers, seedlings of both <I>Quararibea </I>sp. and <I>Minquartia guianensis </I> survived relatively well under mature forest conditions (<A HREF="#TAB2">Table 2</A>). On a plot basis, the mortality  of <I>Quararibea </I>sp. seedlings was marginally higher in secondary forests (Kruskal-Wallis test,  P=0.06), but that of <I>Minquartia guianensis </I>was not different between the mature and  secondary forests (Kruskal-Wallis test, P=0.47).</P>     <P>    <CENTER><A NAME="TAB2"></A><IMG SRC="img/revistas/cofo/v11n1/v11n1a03tab2.jpg"></CENTER></P>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>On average, the growth estimates for both species did not show any trend during the sampling  period. For example, the average height of <I>Minquartia guianensis </I>in the four secondary  forest plots fluctuated around 12 cm at all measurement events (<A HREF="#FIG3">Figure 3</A>). Seedling heights in  mature forests, and seedling diameter in both forest types showed a similar lack of trend  (figures not shown).</P>     <P>    <CENTER><A NAME="FIG3"></A><IMG SRC="img/revistas/cofo/v11n1/v11n1a03fig3.jpg"></CENTER></P>       <P>For <I>Quararibea </I>sp., the relative height or diameter increments of transplanted seedlings  (<A HREF="#TAB3">Table 3</A>) did not differbetweenforesttypes(ANOVAF=0.003,P=0.96 and F=1.18, P=0.32, respectively).  Relative height increment did not show any significant variation between plots within forest types  (ANOVA F=0.65, P=0.69). However, plots within forest types did explain variation in relative  diameter increments (ANOVA F=4.4, P&lt;0.05). <I>In situ </I>seedlings of <I>Quararibea </I>sp.  did not show different relative height increments compared to transplanted seedlings (Mann-Whitney  test, P=0.19), but did show larger relative diameter increments (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.008).</P>      <P>Also for <I>Minquartia guianensis, </I>the growth estimates of transplanted seedlings failed to  show any explanation by forest types (ANOVAF=0.55, P=0.49 and F=0.02, P=0.87 for relative height  and diameter increments, respectively). Plot effects nested within forests were marginally  significant for relative height increment (ANOVA F=2.0, P=0.063), but showed no effects for  relative diameter increment (ANOVA F=1.5, P=0.19). <I>In situ </I>seedlings grew faster in height  than the transplanted seedlings (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.02), but showed slower diameter increments  (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.015).</P>     <P>    <CENTER><A NAME="TAB3"></A><IMG SRC="img/revistas/cofo/v11n1/v11n1a03tab3.jpg"></CENTER></P>       <P><B>DISCUSSION </B></P>     <P>The main result of this preliminary study was that timber species seedlings transplanted in old  secondary forests did not perform worse regarding mortality and initial growth than seedlings  transplanted in mature forests. This suggests that enriching secondary forests with timber species  may have some potential for local restoration. However, caution is needed to interpret the value of  this result.</P>      <P>First, the secondary forest selected for the transplantation experiments was older than 30  years. This assured that levels of soil nutrient concentrations and canopy openness would be  similar to those found in the mature forests, reducing site variation in the transplantation  experiments. Yet, young secondary forests show relatively large differences in forest structure,  physiognomy, and soil fertility compared to mature forests. The two timber species selected for  the transplantation experiments belonged to a guild of shade-tolerant canopy species (Whitmore 1996).  As seedling and sapling, many of these tree species are especially adapted to survive long periods  of low light conditions in tall forests. In young secondary forests these seedlings may perform far  worse than in old secondary forests.</P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P>The measurement period was extremely short. As a consequence, the sampling period may have been  too short to record noticeable differences in growth of the two selected shade-tolerant canopy  species, which are known to grow slowly in low light conditions (Clark &amp; Clark 1999,  Lewis &amp; Tanner 2000, Welden <I>et al</I>. 1991). Studies on the growth of <I>Minquartia </I>in  rainforests of Costa Rica have found stem diameter increments of less than 4 mm per year (Clark  &amp; Clark 1999). Monitoring growth and establishment of shade-tolerant canopy species also  require measurement periods of several years to incorporate the impacts of climatic variations  and forest dynamics (Clark &amp; Clark 1999, Campana-Camargo <I>et al</I>. 2002, Benitez <I>et al</I>.  2005). In our study, transplanted seedlings from <I>Quararibea </I>sp. grew faster in diameter  compared to the <I>in situ </I>seedlings, and those from <I>Minquartia guianensis </I>grew faster  in height but slower in diameter. The short measurement period and the inherently poor estimate of  seedling growth is probably responsible for this rather inconsistent behaviour of transplanted  seedlings in comparison with the <I>in situ </I> seedlings. Likewise, the plot effects within  forest may have this explanation.</P>      <P>Finally, there are some important methodological short-comings that influence the interpretations  and conclusions of our preliminary study. The seedlings as well as the experimental plots were not  selected at random. This affects the outcome of the experimental comparisons in a entirely  unpredictable way. For example, the field selection of seedlings may have been done with an  unintential bias for vigorous seedlings. It is quite likely that preferential collection of  seedlings for enrichment trials represents an efficient way of obtaining adequate planting material.  However, because it is unclear if and how criteria related to the conditions of the seedlings were  applied in this study, testing of the experimental sampling results to allow generalizations have  limited value and hamper the development of follow-up studies. Also, the measurement of the  <I>in situ </I>seedlings was not synchronic with the recording period of the transplanted seedlings,  leading to unwanted and poorly understood variation in seedling comparisons. Lastly, the experiment  took place in a small area, which implies that the conclusions may not apply to other areas in  Amazonia, where different conditions of climate, terrain, soils, and forests may prevail.</P>      <P><B>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</B></P>     <P>We gratefully acknowledge all help received from Tropenbos-Colombia, Amacayacu National Park,  the UAESPNN, as well as the people in the communities around the park, especially those from  Mocagua and Palmeras. We thank Angela Parrado, Carlos Rodriguez, and one anonymous reviewer for  useful comments on the manuscript. Financial support was given by Tropenbos International Colombia  Programme and the Universiteit van Amsterdam (IBED). This study was part of a thesis research in  the masters in Tropical Ecology at the Universiteit van Amsterdam.</P>      <P><B>BIBLIOGRAPHY REFERENCES</B></P>     <!-- ref --><P>Arbel&aacute;ez, F. P. Kop, &amp; J.A. Maldonado-Ocampo. 2008. Geological differentiation explains diversity and composition of fish communities in upland streams in the southern Amazon of Colombia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24: 505-515.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000068&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Benitez-Malvido, J. J.F. Duivenvoorden J.L. Camargo &amp; D.K. Ferraz. 2005. Responses of seedling transplants to environmental variations in contrasting habitats of Central Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21: 397-406.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000069&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Campana-Camargo, J.L. &amp; A.M. Imakawa. 2002. Rehabilitation of degraded areas of Central Amazonia using direct sowing of forest tree seeds. Restoration Ecology 10: 636-644.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000070&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Chinea, J.D. 2002. Tropical forest succession on abandoned farms in the Humaco Municipality of Eastern Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management 167: 195-207.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000071&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Clark, D.A. F. Grimard &amp; D.B. Clark. 1999. Assesing the growth of tropical rain forest trees: issues for forest modeling and management. Ecological Applications 9: 981-997.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000072&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Coomes, O.E., D.V.J. Tanner, &amp; G.J. Burt. 2000. Tropical forest and shifting cultivation: secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics 32: 109-124.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000073&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Finegan, B. 1996. Patterns and processes in neotropical secondary rainforest: the first 100 years old succession. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 119-124.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000074&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>G&oacute;mez-Pompa, A. &amp; F.W. Burley, 1991. The management of natural tropical forests pgs. 13-18 in: A. Gomez-pompa, T.C. Whitmore &amp; M. Hadley (eds.) Rainforest regeneration and management. UNESCO. Paris, France &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000075&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Guariguata, M. &amp; I.D.K. Ferraz 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148: 185-206.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000076&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>IGAC. 1990. M&eacute;todos anal&iacute;ticos del laboratorio de suelos Instituto Geogr&aacute;fico Agust&iacute;n Codazzi. 502 pg. Bogot&aacute;. Colombia.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000077&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Kozlowski, T.T. 2002. Physiological ecology of natural regeneration of harvested and disturbed forest stands: implications for forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 158: 195-221.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000078&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Lewis, S.L. &amp; R. Ostertag, 2000. Effects of above and below-ground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings. Ecology 81: 2525-2538.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000079&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Meffe, G. C.F. Carroll &amp;contributors. 1997. Principles of Conservation Biology 729 pg . Sinauer Ass. Boston. U.S.A.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000080&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Metzger, J.P. M. Martinez-Ramos, 2002. Landscape dynamics and equilibrium in areas of slash-and-burn agriculture with short and long fallow period (Bragantina region, NE Brazilian Amazon). Landscape Ecology 17: 419-431.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000081&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Proradam. 1979. La Amazonia colombiana y sus recursos Rep&uacute;blica de Colombia. 590 pg. Bogot&aacute;. Colombia.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000082&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Smith, J. P. Ferreira, K. Reategui, I. Lombardi, C. Sabogal &amp; A. Diaz. 1999. Dynamics of secondary forests in slash-and-burn farming: interactions among land use types in the Peruvian Amazon. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 76: 85-98.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000083&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Smith, J. C.P. Kop, F. Ferreira, &amp; C. Sabogal. 2003. The persistence of secondary forests on colonist farms in the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 58: 125-135.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000084&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Welden, C.W. S.W. Hewett, S.P. Hubbell &amp; R.B. Foster. 1991. Sapling survival, growth and recruitment: relationship to canopy height in a neotropical forest. Ecology 72: 35-50.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000085&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Whitmore, T.C. 1996. A review of some of the aspects of tropical rainforest seedling ecology with suggestions for further inquiry Pgs. 3 in: M. D. Swaine (eds). The ecology of tropical forest tree seedlings. Parthenon, Comforth and UNESCO. Paris, France. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000086&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><P>Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis 662 pg. Prentice Hall. U.S.A.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000087&pid=S0120-0739200800010000300020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arbeláez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kop]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maldonado-Ocampo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Geological differentiation explains diversity and composition of fish communities in upland streams in the southern Amazon of Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Tropical Ecology]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<page-range>505-515</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benitez-Malvido]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duivenvoorden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camargo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferraz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Responses of seedling transplants to environmental variations in contrasting habitats of Central Amazonia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Tropical Ecology]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>397-406</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campana-Camargo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Imakawa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Rehabilitation of degraded areas of Central Amazonia using direct sowing of forest tree seeds]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Restoration Ecology]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>636-644</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chinea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tropical forest succession on abandoned farms in the Humaco Municipality of Eastern Puerto Rico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Forest Ecology and Management]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>167</volume>
<page-range>195-207</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clark]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grimard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clark]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Assesing the growth of tropical rain forest trees: issues for forest modeling and management]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecological Applications]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>981-997</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coomes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tanner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.V.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tropical forest and shifting cultivation: secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian Amazon]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecological Economics]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>109-124</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finegan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Patterns and processes in neotropical secondary rainforest: the first 100 years old succession]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Trends in Ecology and Evolution]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>119-124</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez-Pompa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The management of natural tropical forests]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gomez-pompa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whitmore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Rainforest regeneration and management]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>13-18</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNESCO]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guariguata]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferraz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.D.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Forest Ecology and Management]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>148</volume>
<page-range>185-206</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>IGAC</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Métodos analíticos del laboratorio de suelos Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kozlowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Physiological ecology of natural regeneration of harvested and disturbed forest stands: implications for forest management]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Forest Ecology and Management]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>158</volume>
<page-range>195-221</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lewis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ostertag]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of above and below-ground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<page-range>2525-2538</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroll]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Principles of Conservation Biology]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boston ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sinauer Ass.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Metzger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martinez-Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Landscape dynamics and equilibrium in areas of slash-and-burn agriculture with short and long fallow period (Bragantina region, NE Brazilian Amazon)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Landscape Ecology]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>419-431</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Proradam</collab>
<source><![CDATA[La Amazonia colombiana y sus recursos República de Colombia]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reategui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lombardi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sabogal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Dynamics of secondary forests in slash-and-burn farming: interactions among land use types in the Peruvian Amazon]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<page-range>85-98</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kop]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sabogal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The persistence of secondary forests on colonist farms in the Brazilian Amazon]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agroforestry Systems]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<page-range>125-135</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Welden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hewett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hubbell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Sapling survival, growth and recruitment: relationship to canopy height in a neotropical forest]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>35-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whitmore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A review of some of the aspects of tropical rainforest seedling ecology with suggestions for further inquiry]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swaine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The ecology of tropical forest tree seedlings]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<page-range>3</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Parthenon, Comforth and UNESCO]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biostatistical Analysis]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Prentice Hall]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
