<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-2596</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Lecturas de Economía]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Lect. Econ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-2596</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Antioquia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-25962014000200007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Community-based conservation programs and local people willingness to pay for wildlife protection: The case of the cotton-top tamarin in the Colombian Caribbean]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Programas de conservación basados en la comunidad y disposición a pagar de los habitantes locales por la conservación silvestre: el caso del mono tití cabeciblanco en el Caribe colombiano]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Les programmes conservation de la nature basés dans la communauté et la volonté de payer des gens locaux pour la conservation du tamarin à crête blanche dans la région des Caraïbes de Colombie]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andrés]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Díaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad del Norte  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Barranquilla ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad del Norte  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Barranquilla ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>81</numero>
<fpage>187</fpage>
<lpage>206</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-25962014000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-25962014000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-25962014000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Community-Based Conservation programs (CBC) are designed on the assumption that local communities are crucial to the success of the conservation agenda. There is the expectation that, by providing benefits to the local people, they will support conservation because it is economically beneficial. This paper uses willingness to pay (WTP) for habitat preservation of the cotton-top tamarin in the Colombian Caribbean as a means to assess the effect of participation in a CBC program on the support for additional conservation. Using the contingent valuation method, we found that: First, households deriving income from conservation activities are more supportive of additional habitat preservation; second, participants and non-participants in the CBC program are equally sensitive to increments in the costs of conservation; and, third, the CBC program is not a burden for non-participant households.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[La Conservación Basada en la Comunidad (CBC) se fundamenta en el supuesto de que las comunidades locales son claves para el éxito de la agenda de conservación, por lo que se espera que los incentivos económicos incrementen su apoyo a ésta. Este artículo utiliza la disponibilidad a pagar (DAP) por la preservación del hábitat del mono tití cabeciblanco (Saguinus oedipus) como medio para analizar el efecto de la participación en un programa CBC sobre el apoyo a un incremento en la actividad de conservación. A través del método de valoración contingente se encontró que: primero, los hogares que obtienen ingresos por participar en el programa CBC están más inclinados a apoyar la preservación de un hábitat mayor; segundo, participantes y no participantes son igualmente sensibles a los incrementos en el costo de la conservación y, finalmente, el programa CBC no es percibido como una carga para los hogares no participantes.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[La conservation de la nature à base communautaire (CBC) est une méthode conçue pour développer des programmes de conservation de la nature, laquelle considère que les gens locaux ont la clé de la réussite des programmes. Ce type de méthode prévoit que les incitations financières augmentent l'appui des gens aux programmes. Cet article utilise la volonté de payer (CAP) dans le cas particulière de la préservation de l'habitat du tamarin à crête blanche (Saguinus Oedipe) en tant qu'un moyen pour d'analyser l'effet de la participation des gens à un programme du type CBC sur le soutien accrue à l'activité de conservation. Grâce à la méthode d'évaluation contingente, nous avons constaté que: premièrement, les ménages qui reçoivent un revenu en participant au programme de conservation voudraient soutenir la préservation d'un habitat plus vaste. Deuxièmement, aussi bien les ménages participants que les ménages non-participants sont également sensibles à l'augmentation du coût de la conservation et, finalement, le programme CBC n'est pas perçue comme une change additionnelle pour les ménages non-participants.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Biodiversity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[contingent valuation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[community-based conservation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[tropical dry forest]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[biodiversidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[valoración contingente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[conservación basada en la comunidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[bosque seco tropical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[biodiversité]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[évaluation contingente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[conservation à base communautaire]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[forêt tropicale sèche]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">     <p align="right"> <b>ARTICLES</b></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><b><font size="4">Community-based conservation programs and local   people willingness to pay for wildlife protection: The case of the cotton-top tamarin in the Colombian Caribbean</font></b></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><b><font size="3"> Programas de conservaci&oacute;n basados en la comunidad y disposici&oacute;n a pagar de los habitantes   locales por la conservaci&oacute;n silvestre: el caso del mono tit&iacute; cabeciblanco en el Caribe colombiano</font></b></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><b><font size="3"> Les programmes conservation de la nature bas&eacute;s dans la communaut&eacute; et la volont&eacute; de   payer des gens locaux pour la conservation du tamarin &agrave; cr&ecirc;te blanche dans la r&eacute;gion des Cara&iuml;bes de Colombie</font></b></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Andr&eacute;s Vargas*; David D&iacute;az**</b></p>     <p>* Profesor e investigador, Departamento de Econom&iacute;a, Universidad del Norte,   Barranquilla. Direcci&oacute;n postal: Instituto de Estudios Econ&oacute;micos del Caribe, Universidad   del Norte, Km 5 V&iacute;a Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla, Colombia. Direcci&oacute;n electr&oacute;nica: <A href="mailto:andresmv@uninorte.edu.co">andresmv@uninorte.edu.co</a>.</p>     <p> ** Profesor e investigador, Departamento de Econom&iacute;a, Universidad del Norte,   Barranquilla. Direcci&oacute;n postal: Instituto de Estudios Econ&oacute;micos del Caribe, Universidad   del Norte, Km 5 V&iacute;a Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla, Colombia. Direcci&oacute;n electr&oacute;nica: <a href="mailto:davidd@uninorte.edu.co">davidd@uninorte.edu.co</a>.</p>     <p> This study was funded by OCSA, Observatorio de Condiciones Socioecon&oacute;micas del Atl&aacute;ntico,   at Universidad del Norte. We would like to thank to the Fundacion Proyecto Titi and   their staff for their support and technical assistance.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="center"><b>&#8211;Introduction. &#8211;I. Contextual information. &#8211;II. Methods.&#8211;III. Results. &#8211;IV. Discussion. &#8211;Conclusion.</b></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><i>Primera versi&oacute;n recibida el 12 de diciembre de 2013; versi&oacute;n final aceptada el 12 de abril de 2014</i></p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr noshade size="1">     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Community-Based Conservation programs (CBC) are designed on the assumption that local communities   are crucial to the success of the conservation agenda. There is the expectation that, by providing benefits to the local   people, they will support conservation because it is economically beneficial. This paper uses willingness to pay (WTP)   for habitat preservation of the cotton-top tamarin in the Colombian Caribbean as a means to assess the effect of participation   in a CBC program on the support for additional conservation. Using the contingent valuation method, we   found that: First, households deriving income from conservation activities are more supportive of additional habitat   preservation; second, participants and non-participants in the CBC program are equally sensitive to increments in the costs of conservation; and, third, the CBC program is not a burden for non-participant households.</p>     <p> <b>Keywords</b>: <i>Biodiversity, contingent valuation, community-based conservation, tropical dry forest.</i></p>     <p> <b>JEL Classification: </b>Q51, Q57.</p> <hr noshade size="1">     <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>La Conservaci&oacute;n Basada en la Comunidad (CBC) se fundamenta en el supuesto de que las comunidades   locales son claves para el &eacute;xito de la agenda de conservaci&oacute;n, por lo que se espera que los incentivos   econ&oacute;micos incrementen su apoyo a &eacute;sta. Este art&iacute;culo utiliza la disponibilidad a pagar (DAP) por la preservaci&oacute;n   del h&aacute;bitat del mono tit&iacute; cabeciblanco (Saguinus oedipus) como medio para analizar el efecto de la participaci&oacute;n   en un programa CBC sobre el apoyo a un incremento en la actividad de conservaci&oacute;n. A trav&eacute;s del m&eacute;todo de   valoraci&oacute;n contingente se encontr&oacute; que: primero, los hogares que obtienen ingresos por participar en el programa   CBC est&aacute;n m&aacute;s inclinados a apoyar la preservaci&oacute;n de un h&aacute;bitat mayor; segundo, participantes y no participantes   son igualmente sensibles a los incrementos en el costo de la conservaci&oacute;n y, finalmente, el programa CBC no es percibido como una carga para los hogares no participantes.</p>     <p> <b>Palabras Clave:</b> <i>biodiversidad, valoraci&oacute;n contingente, conservaci&oacute;n basada en la comunidad, bosque seco tropical.</i></p>     <p> <b>Clasificaci&oacute;n JEL</b>: Q51, Q57.</p> <hr noshade size="1">     <p><b>R&Eacute;SUM&Eacute;</b></p>     <p>La conservation de la nature &agrave; base communautaire (CBC) est une m&eacute;thode con&ccedil;ue pour d&eacute;velopper des   programmes de conservation de la nature, laquelle consid&egrave;re que les gens locaux ont la cl&eacute; de la r&eacute;ussite des programmes.   Ce type de m&eacute;thode pr&eacute;voit que les incitations financi&egrave;res augmentent l'appui des gens aux programmes. Cet   article utilise la volont&eacute; de payer (CAP) dans le cas particuli&egrave;re de la pr&eacute;servation de l'habitat du tamarin &agrave; cr&ecirc;te   blanche (Saguinus Oedipe) en tant qu'un moyen pour d'analyser l'effet de la participation des gens &agrave; un programme   du type CBC sur le soutien accrue &agrave; l'activit&eacute; de conservation. Gr&acirc;ce &agrave; la m&eacute;thode d'&eacute;valuation contingente, nous   avons constat&eacute; que: premi&egrave;rement, les m&eacute;nages qui re&ccedil;oivent un revenu en participant au programme de conservation   voudraient soutenir la pr&eacute;servation d'un habitat plus vaste. Deuxi&egrave;mement, aussi bien les m&eacute;nages participants que   les m&eacute;nages non-participants sont &eacute;galement sensibles &agrave; l'augmentation du co&ucirc;t de la conservation et, finalement, le programme CBC n'est pas per&ccedil;ue comme une change additionnelle pour les m&eacute;nages non-participants.</p>     <p> <b>Mots-cl&eacute;s:</b> <i>biodiversit&eacute;, &eacute;valuation contingente, conservation &agrave; base communautaire, for&ecirc;t tropicale s&egrave;che.</i></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> <b>Classification JEL:</b> Q51, Q57. </p> <hr noshade size="1">     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p>A great deal of ecosystem stress and degradation takes place in the developing   world, mostly in highly diverse areas, where local communities still   depend on goods and services they consume directly from the natural environment.   This dependency toward the natural environment may turn into   a tragedy of the commons as communities get impoverished. For a long   time, the mainstream of conservation strategies focused on protecting areas,  mostly with low or none population, to sustain biodiversity of natural environments.   In the face of intensive pressure of the population on valuable   ecosystems in the tropics, conservation movements started trying new approaches   that align biodiversity conservation with economic goals for community development (Berkes, 2004).</p>     <p> This new approach of linking conservation with development started in   the mid-1960s with a FAO project in Zambia, and expanded rapidly among   scholars and practitioners (Garnett, Sayer &amp; Du Troit, 2007). Since then,   efforts for integrating conservation and development have pointed to the   need for developing economic and social institutions enabling the generation   of income flows from conservation. The goal of projects following this approach   is to sustain the natural-capital value of ecosystems while improving community welfare (Daily &amp; Matson, 2008).</p>     <p> What differentiates so-called Community-Based Conservation (CBC)   from other approaches is that CBC seeks to empower local people to actively   participate and incorporate their knowledge and interest into the development   of the conservation project (Souto et al., 2014). The CBC approach   is centered on local people and, as such, its success is likely to depend on   the interest and motivation that leads local communities to place biodiversity   conservation as a priority. By providing alternative sources of income   to forest-dependent people and gaining social acceptance through the participatory   process, CBC approaches are expected to alleviate anthropogenic   pressures, thus increasing the likelihood of achieving conservation targets.   In other words, garnering support from local people is critical to successful   conservation (Allendorf et al., 2006; Sodhi et al., 2010). Additionally, better   understanding of people&acute;s preferences towards conservation is important to   the design and implementation of conservation strategies that are both successful and legitimate (Kideghesho, R&oslash;skaft &amp; Kaltenborn, 2007).</p>     <p> This study contributes to the literature by providing evidence on the   effect of a particular CBC program over the preferences for conservation.   It employs the contingent valuation method (CV) as a means to elicit values.   It is worth nothing that even if the responses to the CV questions reveal   attitudes rather than preferences (Kahneman &amp; Sugden, 2005), its results are  still relevant for our purpose, which is to find out whether the CBC program   has made people more supportive of wildlife conservation. An advantage   of the CV method is that it explicitly takes into account the costs of conservation&#8211;   that is, attitudes are elicited with reference to the monetary cost   accruing to respondents. We claim that this stresses, at the individual level,   the conservation-development tensions and trade-offs that are present in the area of study.</p>     <p> The second section of the paper presents information about the study   site and the CBC program. The third contains the methodology. The fourth   section is dedicated to the results, which are discussed in the fifth section. The last section concludes.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> <font size="3"><b>I. Contextual information</b></font></p>     <p> In Colombia, tropical dry forests are in great danger of disappearing.   Actual estimates show that less than 2% of their original area remains intact   (Humboldt, 1998). These forests are considered to be the most endangered   forests of their type in the world. One of the principal causes of its destruction   is their fertile soils, highly suitable for agriculture. This means that most   of the forest areas in the country are tiny fragments surrounded by crop lands   and grasslands. Despite this situation, only 3% of the remaining dry forests   in the country are inside Protected Areas, PA (Rodr&iacute;guez et al., 2012).<sup><a href="#1" name="1b">1</a></sup> Those   forests are also the habitat of different species of primates, among which it   is found the Cotton-Top-Tamarin (<i>Saguinus oedipus</i>), a critically endangered primate endemic in northwestern Colombia (Savage et al., 2010).</p>     <p>  It is also important to mention that the Colombian Caribbean is characterized   by a high incidence of poverty: around 37% of the population   is below the national poverty line for 2012 (DANE, 2013), whereas at the   national level the incidence is of 25%. This fact, coupled with relatively high   demographic pressures, makes the remaining forests in the region vulnerable.   Furthermore, it points out the importance of designing conservation strategies   beyond the traditional approach of Protected Areas, incorporating a better understanding of local people's preferences for environmental protection.</p>     <p> <i><b>A. The CBC program</b></i></p>     <p> The CBC program of our study, Proyecto Tit&iacute;,<sup><a href="#2" name="2b">2</a></sup> is located in the municipalities   of Luruaco and Santa Catalina (Atl&aacute;ntico and Bolivar Departments)   in the Colombian Caribbean region. For this research, the relevant population   consists of the households residing in Luruaco and Santa Catalina town   centers and the villages of Pendales, Los L&iacute;mites, Colorado and Hobo (see   <a href="#f1">Figure 1</a>). The area is characterized by isolated dry tropical forest remnants,   which serve as habitat of the cotton-top tamarin. According to the conservationist   organization ruling the CBC program, the primary threats to the   survival of the cotton-top tamarin are: loss of habitat from conversion of   forest to agricultural uses, extraction of forest resources, and poaching. The   latter is a phenomenon attributed to the high incidence of poverty among households surrounding the forest (Savage et al., 2010).</p>     <p align="center"><a name="f1"></a>   <img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7f1.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p> The CBC program has three areas of emphasis: (1) scientific studies detailing   the biological and long-term survival of the Cotton-top tamarin, (2)   conservation educational programs to increase public awareness and conservation   knowledge, and (3) community development programs that demonstrate   a valuable economic incentive to protect forests. In this study, we are   mainly interested in the effects of the third component because it is the one   that affects attitudes towards conservation through the provision of economic   incentives in this case, the opportunity to have an additional source of   income derived from the existence of the cotton-top tamarin and the conservation efforts.</p>     <p> The strategy consists of the elaboration of tote bags made from recycled   plastic bags, <i>Ecomochilas</i>, and a cotton-top-tamarin-shaped stuffed toy, <i>Tit&iacute;peluches</i>,   by a group of artisans, mostly women. The artisans are grouped into   two registered business, one for the <i>Ecomochilas</i> and the other for the <i>Tit&iacute;peluches</i>.   Each business sells directly to Proyecto Tit&iacute;, who in turn delivers the   products to the national and international markets and pays to the artisans   the final consumer price. It is important to note that the marketing and commercialization   of the two products is done entirely by Proyecto Tit&iacute;. This   is both an advantage and a disadvantage because it guarantees the market,   decreasing the risks to artisans, but at the cost of undermining the self-sustainability of the business.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3">  <b>II. Methods</b></font></p>     <p> To elicit people's preferences, we use the contingent valuation method,   because it allows us to frame the problem in terms of the costs implied by   additional conservation. In other words, attitudes are contingent on the cost   to respondents that additional conservation entails. In this particular case,   we asked people their willingness to pay (WTP) for increased protection of   the cotton-top tamarin through an expansion of the CBC program such that   1,500 hectares of forest areas between Luruaco and Santa Catalina municipalities   will be put under protection&#8211;instead of the 400 hectares currently covered.</p>     <p> In this study, we use a binary discrete-response format with a yearlong   monthly voluntary contribution through the energy bill as the payment   vehicle. To assess the structure and understanding of the survey   and define a WTP bid range for a single dichotomous question, we pretested   the questionnaire with 30 households.<sup><a href="#3" name="3b">3</a></sup> Based on the pre-test and   using as reference the bid vector used by Moreno-Sanchez et al. (2012) in   a rural area of the Colombian Andean region, four bids were randomly   distributed on the sample as follows:<sup><a href="#4" name="4b">4</a></sup> 24% of the households were asked   for a monthly payment of US$1.155; 26% for US$1.9; 26% for US$3.8 and 24% for US$5.8.</p>     <p> The final questionnaire contained six sections: i) Introduction and   identification of social and environmental problems, ii) environmental attitudes,   iii) knowledge and perceptions about the CBC program, iv) the   valuation question, v) demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and   vi) quality control questions to the enumerator. We presented to the respondents the following scenario: ''To reduce the local extinction risk of the    Cotton-top tamarin, it is necessary to put under protection 1500 hectares of forests instead of the 400 hectares currently under protection.''<sup><a href="#5" name="5b">5</a></sup> Then respondents were informed that this will be possible only if a sufficient number of households in the community agree to make a voluntary contribution of $USX, where X is one of the bid amounts (US$1.15, US$1.9, US$3.8, US$5.8). The contribution would be paid along with the energy bill and funds will be administered by the community and Proyecto Tit&iacute;. The valuation question presented was: ''Under the above conditions, would you make a monthly voluntary contribution of US$X during a year to protect the Cotton-top tamarin?'' 46% of the households agreed on making the voluntary contribution.</p>     <p> Given that the valuation good can be characterized as a public good,   people have incentives not to reveal their true WTP. In order to minimize   hypothetical bias, and because the voluntary contribution is not incentive   compatible, we used the following measures: 1). A short cheap talk script   (Loureiro, Loomis &amp; V&aacute;zquez, 2009) followed by a budget remainder (Arrow &amp; Solow, 1993); 2) a provision point mechanism to induce demand revealing behavior (Rondeau, D. Schulze &amp; Poe, 1999), and 3) a consequentiality message which consisted of a short text, accompanied by a local newspaper page showing direct statement from a policy maker informing the respondents that the forest remnants in the area are going to be declared a Protected Area. According to Carson (2012), consequentiality is necessary to produce meaningful information from the answers, and so we expect to generate policy consequentiality (Herriges et al., 2010).</p>     <p> <b><i>A. Econometric model</i></b></p>     <p> In order to calculate additional habitat preservation benefits, we utilized   the dichotomous CVM. According to this approach, the utility of an individual   is a function of the quantity or quality of an environmental attribute, in   this case the area under conservation (represented by C) and the consumption of all other goods (represented by income y). Utility from additional   conservation depends on the individual personal preferences and characteristics,   only some of which are observable to the researcher. The unobservable   part is treated as stochastic, and hence the indirect utility function can be decomposed into a deterministic and a random term as follows:</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7e1.jpg"></p>     <p> where <i>e</i> is the stochastic component. With the dichotomous choice approach,   respondents are asked whether or not they will contribute $X, the bid amount,   to funding an expansion of the conservation project. The respondent will   answer ''Yes'' if utility from additional conservation, with the associated loss   of $X in income, would be greater than or equal to the individual's original   utility level without the project. The respondent who answer ''Yes'' would   hypothetically contribute (<i>C</i> = 1) $X. The probability of a ''Yes'' response is   represented by a comparison of the utility obtained with the additional conservation   and the reduction of $X in income with the utility attained without additional conservation but retaining the current income. That is,</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7e2.jpg"></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> where <i>e</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>e</i><sub>2</sub> are the zero-mean error terms. Because the random components   cannot be identified, we can write <i>e</i> = <i>e</i><sub>1</sub> &#8211; <i>e</i><sub>2</sub>. The econometric specification of (2) is:</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7e3.jpg"></p>     <p> where &phi; is the cumulative standard normal, &beta;1 is the coefficient on the bid   amount, z is a vector of personal characteristics and &alpha; the accompanying   vector of coefficients. Using the coefficients from equation (3), mean WTP is calculated as:</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7e4.jpg"></p>     <p> In (4), <img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7e4a.jpg"> is the mean vector of exogenous variables.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3">  <b>III. Results</b></font></p>     <p><b> <i>A. Descriptive statistics</i></b></p>     <p> Using census information and administrative records, we estimate a total   of 4,378 households residing in the area of influence of Proyecto Tit&iacute;, see   <a href="#f1">figure 1</a>. Survey data were collected for 172 households, of which 166 were   usable for estimation purposes, using face to face interviews with two groups   of previously trained enumerators between April and July of 2012. Because   we lacked a list of households with appropriate contact information, interviewed   households were randomly selected during the field work. To gather   data from participant households in the CBC program, we oversampled households   of the two communities where the program has been more active, L&iacute;mites and Hobo.</p>     <p> As can be seen from <a href="#t1">Table 1</a>, our sample consists mostly of adults with   low levels of education and income. In fact, using the reported household income   of our survey and the official poverty line we found that nearly 50% of   our sample is below the poverty line, which is close to the official estimates   for rural areas. The most frequent environmental problem is water pollution, followed by deforestation and biodiversity loss.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a name="t1"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7t1.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>  Regarding the CBC program, Proyecto Tit&iacute;, 80% of the people know   about its existence, 63% have seen the cotton-top tamarin and 30% have  participated in one of the community development programs. Mean household   income reported by participants in the project is US$383, which is   not statistically different from the one reported by non-participants. We also   collected data on durables consumption as a means of measuring economic   status through the construction of an assets index. As with income, we did   not find any statistical difference in the assets index between participants and   non-participants. In terms of livelihoods, 62% of the surveyed households   earn some income from natural resource dependent activities, like agriculture,   selling of forest products, hunting and fishing. Nevertheless, the most important   sources of income are informal jobs in the service sector, transport and retail.</p>     <p> <i><b>B. WTP estimates</b></i></p>     <p> Under a linear utility function, we estimate the probit model of equation   (3) to calculate mean WTP using equation (4). As dependent variable, we   used the acceptance of the proposed bid, contributes, which takes the value   of 1 if respondents accept the proposed bid and zero otherwise. The explanatory variables are:</p> <ul>    <li> Bid: the value of the voluntary contribution asked to the household.</li>     <li> Participant: this variable takes a value of 1 if the household has participated   in one of the community development programs sponsored by   Proyecto Titi. 30% of the households have participated.</li>     <li> Cartilla: this variable takes a value of 1 if there are children in the household   who participate in the environmental education program.</li>     <li> Male: this variable takes a value of 1 if the respondent is a male.</li>     <li> Educ: is an ordinal variable capturing educational attainment.</li>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<li> Income: reported monthly household income in Colombian pesos.</li>      <li> Drecursos: is a dummy variable taking the value of 1 if the household   obtains income from resource-dependent activities.</li>     <li> BidParticipant: is the product of the variables Bid and Participant</li>    </ul>     <p>  The Participant variable is aimed to test the importance of direct participation   in one of the community development programs on the probability   of supporting additional conservation. The variables Male, Educ and Income   are standard socio-economic controls. The variable Cartilla is included to   see if the educational component of the program affects WTP. The variable   Drecursos is included to test whether households deriving income from the   natural resource base are less supportive of additional conservation efforts.   Cross tabulation of the variable Drecursos and the dependent variable reveals   that 40% of those who are resource-dependent are willing to pay for   additional conservation, which contrasts with the 56% for the non-resource   dependent. A chi-square test (x<sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup> = 4.1) shows that there is a statistically significant   relationship between the two variables.</p>     <p> <a href="#t2">Table 2</a> shows the percentage of respondents who answered yes to the   valuation question; that is, they said they will contribute the randomly assigned   bid. A two-tailed Fisher exact test reveals that, for all the bid amounts,   the percentage of respondents answering yes is statistically different for participants (62%) and non-participants (40%).</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t2"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7t2.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>  Columns (1) and (2) of <a href="#t3">Table 3</a> show the results for the basic probit   model. The first point to mention is that the probability of acceptance is   reduced as the proposed bid increases, implying that there is internal validity.   The variable Participant is significant and indicates that participants in   the community development program are more likely to pay for additional  conservation. The income variable is not significant, which is consistent with   the linear utility form used here. It can also be explained by the fact that the   economic status of our sample does not greatly vary. The variable Drecursos   is not significant, meaning that once included other relevant variables the   relationship between this variable and the acceptance of the proposed bid   no longer holds. Finally, the variable Cartilla does not affect the decision to support additional conservation.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t3"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7t3.jpg"></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>  Column (3) of <a href="#t3">Table 3</a> includes the interaction between Participant and   the Bid, BidParticipant, in order to test whether participation had a differential   effect on respondents who were randomly assigned higher bid prices. The   coefficient on the interaction term was not statistically significant. Taking   the results for the variables Participant and BidParticipant together, we can   say that participant households are more likely to contribute for any level of   the proposed bid; but, as the bid increases, their probability of participating decreases as occurs for non-participants.</p>     <p> One caveat here is that the Participant variable is potentially endogenous   because participation in the community development program is a decision   taken by the people. One way to overcome this problem is using a bivariate   probit model (Greene, 2012). Two reasons prevent us for adopting such approach.   First, we lack a good instrument, so we cannot explore whether parameter   identification under this approach is due to the exclusion restrictions   or the non-linearity of the model (Altonji &amp; Elder, 2005). Second, the sample   size is small. Nonetheless, other authors do not find significant differences   in WTP estimates between probit and bivariate probit (Mart&iacute;nez-Espi&ntilde;eira &amp; Lyssenko, 2011).</p>     <p> <a href="#t4">Table 4</a> shows mean WTP, computed using parameters from column   (2) in <a href="#t3">Table 3</a>. Confidence intervals were constructed using the Krinsky   and Robb procedure, with the Stata code provided by Wilner (2007). As   can be seen, mean WTP for participants is 59% larger than for nonparticipants.<sup><a href="#6" name="6b">6</a></sup></p>       <p align="center"><a name="t4"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/le/n81/n81a7t4.jpg"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3">  <b>IV. Discussion</b></font></p>     <p> The demand for conservation is cost sensitive, meaning that the higher the   proposed contribution the lower the proportion of people willing to support the   initiative. This suggests that just pointing to the importance of forests as ecosystem   service providers is not enough to gain the sufficient support to advance   the conservation agenda. This result is similar to what is found in other research   areas, where it is shown that development projects that seem beneficial to the   community do not have a demand as higher as expected by the organizations   seeking to implement the project (Whittington, 2010). In other words, community members are aware of the opportunity cost of additional conservation.</p>     <p> Households deriving income from the conservation activities, through their   participation in the community development programs, are more supportive of   additional conservation but at a decreasing rate. At any cost participants are   more likely to contribute than non-participants, but the higher the cost the lower   their willingness to contribute. This result highlights two important aspects:   First, when there is a way to generate incomes from forest protection, its economic   value increases; or, in economics parlance, the total economic value of   the natural asset increases due to a higher use value, and; second, the fact that   participants are more supportive does not mean that they are motivated by any   long-term concern for biodiversity protection. Immediate concerns about the   incomes they are earning could be driving the result. Research in other settings   has found this mismatch between short-term private incentives and forest sustainability (Lybbert et al., 2011).</p>     <p> Mean WTP for households' members of the community development programs   is higher, confirming that CBC programs can be effective in increasing   the value of forests. Although this is quite intuitive, it is nonetheless important.   For example, a higher economic value is a critical argument in favor of conservation   in a cost-benefit analysis. From the point of view of the relationship   between conservation and development, it is also an expression of the welfare gains experienced by those households involved in the conservation program.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> Because non-participants also have positive mean WTP, it could be said that   in general the CBC program does not have negative effects on other members  of the community for which they seek some sort of compensation. This is not   always the case (Muchapondwa, Carlsson &amp; K&ouml;hlin, 2008), in particular when   conservation is perceived as having negative effects on the livelihoods of local   communities (Kideghesho et al., 2007; Arjunan et al., 2006). The lesson here is   that CBC programs do not need to provide direct benefits to all members of the community but to strongly avoid to be perceived as a burden.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3"><b>Conclusions</b></font></p>     <p> Community Based Conservation programs can provide economic benefits   to communities, making them more supportive of wildlife protection. Because   conservation is a particular land-use type, it competes with alternative uses,   each of them with potential economic benefits. This fact, in conjunction with   the characteristic land-tenure regime of the area, determines the distribution of   gains and losses of any project. In the present study, the welfare gains of wildlife   protection through the expansion of a CBC program have been calculated.   The study takes place in a context where most of the rural population is landless   and forest remnants are inside private farmlands or haciendas, meaning   that the benefits of economic activities will be appropriated by land owners   and not by the local people. Because of this, wildlife protection, represented   here by the Cotton-top Tamarin, is supported by most local inhabitants. In its   own way, the CBC program makes financially tangible the benefits of conservation   despite the fact that the dry forest is under a private land regime. This   pro-conservation attitude of locals suggests that distributive effects cannot be overlooked in assessing alternative land use decisions.</p>     <p> Using the contingent valuation method, the study found that people directly   involved in community development programs are more supportive   of conservation than those not participating. Two immediate implications   are that BC programs can be effective in increasing the economic value of   forests, and that it is also an expression of the welfare gains experienced by   those poor households involved in the conservation program. Nevertheless,   both participants and non-participants are less likely to contribute to additional   conservation if the cost of doing so increases. In other words, the actual   gains people are enjoying from forest conservation and its wildlife is not a guarantee that they will keep a positive attitude towards it.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr noshade size="1">     <p><font size="3"> <b>NOTAS </b></font></p>     <p> <a href="#1b" name="1">1</a> Colombia used to have extensive areas of tropical dry forest in two of its six natural regions: the Caribbean and the Pacific. The area of the tropical dry forest of Colombia was first estimated in 80,000 km2 by 1920. Since then, due to human intervention, this figure reduced considerably to the point that in 1950, the coverage was estimated in 35,000 km<sup>2</sup>. Timber logging and cattle ranching in the Caribbean, and sugar cane plantations in the Pacific are reported as the main drivers of dry forest loss during the first half of the past century. In 1992, 98.5% of the original dry forest had been reported as disappeared, leaving only 1,200 km2 left in the form of discontinuous patches mostly located in steep lands (D&iacute;az, 2006). </p>     <p><a href="#2b" name="2">2</a> More information about the project can be found at <a href="www.proyectotiti.co" target="_blank">www.proyectotiti.co</a></p>     <p><a href="#3b" name="3">3</a> The pre-test survey used two payment vehicles: i) a voluntary contribution and, ii) a referendum type question. In the definitive survey the voluntary contribution was preferred because was easier to understand and more realistic to the respondents. In the pre-test survey we used a broader bid range with higher lowest and largest values which did not generated a smooth ''demand'' curve.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a href="#4b" name="4">4</a> Original values in Colombian pesos were converted using the 2012 PPP-based exchange rate of COP$1,302 per international dollar.</p>     <p><a href="#5b" name="5">5</a> There are not scientific estimates from which extinction probabilities could be obtained.</p>     <p><a href="#6b" name="6">6</a> Given the simulation approach used, non-overlapping confidence intervals are not equivalent to a statistically significant difference.</p> <hr noshade size="1">     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3"> <b>References</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Altonji, Joseph &amp; Elder, Todd (2005). ''An evaluation of instrumental variable   strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling'', <i>The Journal   of Human Resources</i>, Vol. 40, Issue 4, pp. 791-821.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000118&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Allendorf, Teri; Swe, Khaing Khaing; Oo, Thida; Htut, Ye; Aung, Myint;   Aung, Myint, . . . Wemmer, Chris (2006). ''Community attitudes   toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma)'',<i> Environmental Conservation</i>, Vol. 33, Issue 04, pp. 344-352.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000120&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Arjunan, M.; Holmes, Christopher; Puyravaud, Jean-Philippe &amp; Davidar,   Priya (2006). ''Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward   conservation? A case study from the Kalakad&#8211;Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India'', <i>Journal of Environmental Management</i>, Vol. 79, Issue 2, pp. 188-197.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000122&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Arrow, Kenneth &amp; Solow, Robert; Portney, Paul; Leamer, Edward; Radner,   Roy; Schuman, Howard (1993). <i>Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Washington</i>, DC.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000124&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Berkes, Fikret (2004). ''Rethinking Community-Based Conservation'', <i>Conservation Biology</i>, Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 621-630.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000126&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Carson, Richard T. (2012). ''Contingent valuation: a practical alternative   when prices aren't available'',<i> The Journal of Economic Perspectives,</i> Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 27-42.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000128&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Daily, Gretchen &amp; Matson, Pamela (2008). ''Ecosystem services: From   theory to implementation'', <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</i>, Vol. 105, Issue 28, pp. 9455-9456.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000130&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estad&iacute;stica (DANE) (2013).   ''Pobreza monetaria y multidemensional 2013''. Recuperado de: <a href="www.dane.gov.co/index.php/es/estdisticas-sociales/pobreza/87-sociales/calidad-devida/5405-pobreza-monetaria-y-multidimensional-2013" target="_blank">www.dane.gov.co/index.php/es/estdisticas-sociales/pobreza/87-sociales/calidad-devida/5405-pobreza-monetaria-y-multidimensional-2013</a> (marzo de 2014).    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000132&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> D&iacute;az Merlano, Juan Manuel (2006). <i>Bosque seco tropical de Colombia</i>. Bogot&aacute;: I/M Editores.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000134&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Garnett, Stephen; Sayer, Jeffrey &amp; Du Troit, Johan (2007). ''Improving the   effectivness of interventions to balance conservation and development: A conceptual framework'', <i>Ecology and Society</i>, vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 1-20.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000136&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Greene, William (2012). <i>Econometric Analysis</i> (7th Edition). USA: Prentice Hall.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000138&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Herriges, Joseph; Kling, Catherine; Liu, Chih-Chen &amp; Tobias, Justin   (2010). ''What are the consequences of consequentiality?'', <i>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management</i>, Vol. 59, Issue 1, pp. 67-81.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Instituto Alexander von Humboldt (1998). ''El bosque seco tropical   (Bs-T) en Colombia''. Recuperado de: <a href="http://media.utp.edu.co/ciebreg/archivos/bosque-seco-tropical/el-bosque-seco-tropical-en-colombia.pdf" target="_blank">http://media.utp.edu.co/ciebreg/archivos/bosque-seco-tropical/el-bosque-seco-tropical-en-colombia.pdf</a> (marzo 2014).    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Kahneman, Daniel &amp; Sugden, Robert (2005). ''Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation'', <i>Environmental and Resource Economics,</i> Vol. 32, Issue 1, pp. 161-181.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Kideghesho, Jafari; R&oslash;skaft, Eivin &amp; Kaltenborn, Bj&oslash;rn (2007). ''Factors   influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania'', <i>Biodiversity and Conservation,</i> Vol. 16, Issue 7, pp. 2213-2230.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Loureiro, Maria; Loomis, John &amp; V&aacute;zquez, Maria Xos&eacute; (2009). ''Economic   Valuation of Environmental Damages due to the Prestige Oil Spill in Spain'', <i>Environmental and Resource Economics</i>, Vol. 44, Issue 4, pp. 537-553.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000148&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Lybbert, Travis; Aboudrare, Abdellah; Chaloud, Deborah; Magnan, Nicholas   &amp; Nash, Maliha (2011). ''Booming markets for Moroccan argan   oil appear to benefit some rural households while threatening the endemic   argan forest'', <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</i>, Vol.   108, Issue 34, pp. 13963-13968.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000150&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Mart&iacute;nez-Espi&ntilde;eira, Roberto &amp; Lyssenko, Nikita (2011). ''Correcting for   the endogeneity of pro-environment behavioral choices in contingent valuation'',   <i>Ecological Economics</i>, Vol. 70, Issue 8, pp. 1435-1439.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000152&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio; Maldonado, Jorge Higinio; Wunder, Sven &amp;   Borda-Almanza, Carlos (2012). ''Heterogeneous users and willingness   to pay in an ongoing payment for watershed protection initiative in the   Colombian Andes'', <i>Ecological Economics</i>, Vol. 75, pp. 126-134.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000154&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Rondeau, Daniel; D. Schulze, William &amp; Poe, Gregory L (1999). ''Voluntary   revelation of the demand for public goods using a provision point   mechanism'', <i>Journal of Public Economics,</i> Vol. 72, Issue 3, pp. 455-470.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000156&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Rodriguez, Gina; Banda, Karina; Reyes, Sandra; Estupi&ntilde;an, Ana (2012).   ''Lista comentada de las plantas vasculares de bosques secos prioritarios   para la conservaci&oacute;n en los departamentos de Atl&aacute;ntico y Bolivar (Atl&aacute;ntico   Colombiano)'', <i>Biota Colombiana</i>, Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 7-39.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000158&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Savage, A.; Guillen, R.; Lamilla, I. &amp; Soto, L. (2010). ''Developing an   effective community conservation program for cotton-top tamarins   (Saguinus oedipus) in Colombia'', <i>American Journal of Primatology</i>, Vol.   72, Issue 5, pp. 379-390.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000160&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Sodhi, Navjots; Lee, TienMing; Sekercioglu, CaganH; Webb, EdwardL;   Prawiradilaga, DewiM; Lohman, DavidJ; . . . Ehrlich, PaulR (2010).   ''Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks'',   <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i>, Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 1175-1188.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000162&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Souto, Tamia; Deichmann, JessicaL; N&uacute;&ntilde;ez, Cecilia &amp; Alonso, Alfonso   (2014). ''Classifying conservation targets based on the origin of motivation:   implications over the success of community-based conservation   projects'', <i>Biodiversity and Conservation</i>, Vol. 23, Issue 5, pp. 1331-1337.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000164&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Whittington, Dale (2010). ''What Have We Learned from 20 Years of Stated   Preference Research in Less-Developed Countries?'', <i>Annual Review of   Resource Economics,</i> Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 209-236.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000166&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p> Wilner P, Jeanty (2007). <i>Constructing Krinsky and Robb confidence interval   for mean and median willingness to pay (WTP) using STATA</i>. 6<sup>th</sup> North   American Stata Users Work Group Meetings, 8. Recuprado de: <a href="http://repec.org/nasug2007/pwj_nasug07.pdf" target="_blank">http://repec.org/nasug2007/pwj_nasug07.pdf</a> (marzo 2014).    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000168&pid=S0120-2596201400020000700026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Altonji]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Todd]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Human Resources]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>791-821</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allendorf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Teri]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Khaing Khaing]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thida]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Htut]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ye]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Myint]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Myint]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wemmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Chris]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Environmental Conservation]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>04</numero>
<issue>04</issue>
<page-range>344-352</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arjunan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holmes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christopher]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Puyravaud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jean-Philippe]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davidar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Priya]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Environmental Management]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>79</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>188-197</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arrow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kenneth]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Solow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Portney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leamer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Radner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roy]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schuman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Howard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington^eDC DC]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berkes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fikret]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Rethinking Community-Based Conservation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Conservation Biology]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>621-630</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren't available]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Economic Perspectives]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>27-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Daily]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gretchen]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Matson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pamela]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>105</volume>
<numero>28</numero>
<issue>28</issue>
<page-range>9455-9456</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Pobreza monetaria y multidemensional 2013]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Díaz Merlano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Manuel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Bosque seco tropical de Colombia]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[I/M Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garnett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stephen]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sayer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Du Troit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Johan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Improving the effectivness of interventions to balance conservation and development: A conceptual framework]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology and Society]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greene]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[William]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Econometric Analysis]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<edition>7</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Prentice Hall]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herriges]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Catherine]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Chih-Chen]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tobias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Justin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[What are the consequences of consequentiality?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Environmental Economics and Management]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>67-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Instituto Alexander von Humboldt</collab>
<source><![CDATA[El bosque seco tropical (Bs-T) en Colombia]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kahneman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniel]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sugden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Environmental and Resource Economics]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>161-181</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kideghesho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jafari]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Røskaft]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eivin]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kaltenborn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bjørn]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biodiversity and Conservation]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>2213-2230</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Loureiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Loomis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria Xosé]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Economic Valuation of Environmental Damages due to the Prestige Oil Spill in Spain]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Environmental and Resource Economics]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>537-553</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lybbert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Travis]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aboudrare]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Abdellah]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chaloud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Deborah]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magnan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicholas]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nash]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maliha]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Booming markets for Moroccan argan oil appear to benefit some rural households while threatening the endemic argan forest]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>108</volume>
<numero>34</numero>
<issue>34</issue>
<page-range>13963-13968</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Espiñeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lyssenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nikita]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Correcting for the endogeneity of pro-environment behavioral choices in contingent valuation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecological Economics]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>70</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>1435-1439</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreno-Sanchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rocio]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maldonado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jorge Higinio]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wunder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sven]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borda-Almanza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Heterogeneous users and willingness to pay in an ongoing payment for watershed protection initiative in the Colombian Andes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecological Economics]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>126-134</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rondeau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniel]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D. Schulze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[William]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gregory L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Voluntary revelation of the demand for public goods using a provision point mechanism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Public Economics]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>455-470</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gina]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Banda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Karina]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sandra]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Estupiñan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Lista comentada de las plantas vasculares de bosques secos prioritarios para la conservación en los departamentos de Atlántico y Bolivar (Atlántico Colombiano)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biota Colombiana]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>7-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Savage]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guillen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Developing an effective community conservation program for cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Primatology]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>379-390</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sodhi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Navjots]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TienMing]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sekercioglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CaganH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Webb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EdwardL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prawiradilaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DewiM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lohman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DavidJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ehrlich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PaulR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biodiversity and Conservation]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1175-1188</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Tamia]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deichmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JessicaL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Núñez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cecilia]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alonso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alfonso]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Classifying conservation targets based on the origin of motivation: implications over the success of community-based conservation projects]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biodiversity and Conservation]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1331-1337</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whittington]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dale]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[What Have We Learned from 20 Years of Stated Preference Research in Less-Developed Countries?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Review of Resource Economics]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilner P]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeanty]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Constructing Krinsky and Robb confidence interval for mean and median willingness to pay (WTP) using STATA]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[6th North American Stata Users Work Group Meetings]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
