<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-3479</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Lenguaje]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Leng.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-3479</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad del Valle, Escuela de Ciencias del Lenguaje]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-34792021000200484</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25100/lenguaje.v49i2.9365</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Compound nouns do not always fulfill the conjunction thesis: An analysis using the mental model theory]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Los nombres compuestos no cumplen siempre la tesis de la conjunción: Un análisis desde la teoría de los modelos mentales]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Les noms composés ne sont pas toujours conformes à la thèse de conjonction : Une analyse de la théorie des modèles mentaux]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Astorga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Miguel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Talca  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Talca ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>484</fpage>
<lpage>496</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-34792021000200484&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-34792021000200484&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-34792021000200484&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This paper is intended to show that the properties classical logic attributes to conjunction are not always found in real compound nouns in natural language. This fact is described by means of several examples taken from different natural languages. The main conclusion is that perhaps a better option to understand human language and communicative phenomena is to assume a basically semantic approach with the mental model theory proposed as a more suitable alternative. This is because the fact that the logical properties that are not always present in real compound nouns is not considered a problem under the framework of this theory.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Este trabajo intenta mostrar que las propiedades que la lógica clásica atribuye a la conjunción no se pueden siempre encontrar en nombres compuestos reales en lenguaje natural. Este hecho es descrito por medio de varios ejemplos y recurriendo a diferentes lenguajes naturales. Las conclusiones son que, quizás, una mejor opción para comprender el lenguaje humano y los fenómenos comunicativos puede ser asumir un enfoque básicamente semántico, y que una buena alternativa en este sentido puede ser la teoría de los modelos mentales. Esto es así porque los problemas provocados por las propiedades lógicas que no están a veces presentes en nombres compuestos reales no son verdaderas dificultades bajo el marco de esa teoría.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Résumé Cet article est destiné à montrer que les propriétés que la logique classique attribue à la conjonction ne se trouvent pas toujours dans les noms composés réels en langage naturel. Ce fait est décrit au moyen de plusieurs exemples et en faisant appel à des langues naturelles différentes. En conclusion, une meilleure option pour comprendre le langage humain et les phénomènes de communication pourrait être d&#8217;adopter une approche fondamentalement sémantique. De même, une bonne alternative dans ce sens peut être la théorie des modèles mentaux. Ceci s´explique parce que les problèmes causés par les propriétés logiques qui ne sont pas parfois présentes dans les noms composés réels, ne sont pas des difficultés réelles dans le cadre de cette théorie.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[compound noun]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[conjunction]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[mental model]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[semantics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[syntax]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[nombre compuesto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[conjunción]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[modelo mental]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[semántica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[sintaxis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[nom composé]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[conjonction]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[modèle mental]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[sémantique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[syntaxe]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piaget]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mays]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Braine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Brien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mental Logic]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Braine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Brien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Theory of Mental-Propositional Logic: Description and Illustration]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Braine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Brien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mental Logic]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>79-89</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Braine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Brien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noveck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Samuels]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fisch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Further Evidence for the Theory: Predicting Intermediate and Multiple Conclusions in Propositional Logic Inference Problems]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Braine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Brien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mental Logic]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>145-97</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chomsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lectures on Government and Binding]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Foris Publications]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fillenbaum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mind your p&#8217;s and q&#8217;s: The role of content and context in some uses of and, or, and if]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Psychology of Learning and Motivation]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>41-100</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On the relation between logic and thinking]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Review]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>366-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson-Laird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inference with Mental Models]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holyoak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morrison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>134-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson-Laird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How to improve thinking]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wegerif]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Li]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kaufman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>80-91</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson-Laird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khemlani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goodwin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Logic, probability, and human reasoning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Trends in Cognitive Sciences]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>201-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khemlani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Byrne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson-Laird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Facts and Possibilities: A Model-Based Theory of Sentential Reasoning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cognitive Science]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1887-924</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khemlani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hinterecker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson-Laird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The provenance of modal inference]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gunzelmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Howes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tenbrink]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davelaar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>663-8</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cognitive Science Society]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Astorga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El rechazo de la tesis de la conjunción y sus implicaciones en la teoría de la probabilidad]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Paralaje]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>194-206</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Astorga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mental Models are Compatible with Logical Forms]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Varela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary Approaches to Semiotics]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>31-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Astorga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Language acquisition and innate cognitive abilities: An approach from the mental models theory]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<numero>77</numero>
<issue>77</issue>
<page-range>233-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Orenes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson-Laird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Logic, Models, and Paradoxical Inferences]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mind &amp; Language]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>357-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Pereyra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Truthmaking, Entailment, and the Conjunction Thesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mind]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>115</volume>
<numero>260</numero>
<issue>260</issue>
<page-range>957-82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Pereyra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Disjunction and Conjunction Theses]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mind]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<numero>470</numero>
<issue>470</issue>
<page-range>427-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
