<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-4483</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ensayos sobre POLÍTICA ECONÓMICA]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ens. polit. econ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-4483</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Banco de la República]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-44832010000300004</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Stickiness of Colombian Consumer Prices]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Rigideces de los Precios al Consumidor Colombiano]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Rigidezes dos Preços ao Consumidor Colombiano]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Julio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Manuel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zárate]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Héctor Manuel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Manuel Darío]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Banco de la República  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>63</numero>
<fpage>100</fpage>
<lpage>152</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-44832010000300004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-44832010000300004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-44832010000300004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The price setting behavior of Colombian retailers of goods and services was studied based on a unique dataset containing 12,052,970 individual price reports covering all items in the Colombian CPI from March 1999 to May 2008. The main results are summarized as follows: 1. Colombian consumer prices were found to be stickier than those in Chile and Portugal and might be more flexible than those in the Euro Area and some European countries. 2. Price reductions are not rare. Forty percent of price changes were found to be reductions. 3. Absolute percentage price changes were found to be larger than inflation. 4. As inflation is reduced in Colombia, the following happens: (i) price stickiness increases, (ii) the distribution of price stickiness concentrates on the rigid side, (iii) the variability and bias of the distribution of percentage price changes decreases, and (iv), nominal downward rigidities in the frequency of price changes are invariant to inflation. 5. A slight downward nominal price rigidity was detected in the data. 6. Price change synchronization was found to be low. 7. About 32% of the CPI corresponds to Taylor contracts, 34% to other time dependent rules and 34% to state dependent rules. These findings provide some of the micro fundamentals for the design of staggered contract models for monetary policy analysis in Colombia.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[En este artículo se estudia la formación de precios de los minoristas de bienes y servicios colombianos con base en 12.052.970 reportes de precios de los artículos que conforman el IPC colombiano para el período de 1999.03 a 2008.05. Los principales resultados se resumen así: (1) los precios al consumidor de Colombia son más rígidos que los de Chile y Portugal y podrían ser más flexibles que los del Eurozona. (2) Cuarenta por ciento de los cambios en los precios son reducciones (3) los cambios absolutos en los precios son mayor que la inflación (4) cuando la inflación se reduce en Colombia: la rigidez de los precios se incrementa, la variabilidad y sesgo de la distribución de los cambios en los precios disminuye y las rigideces nominales a la baja en la frecuencia de los cambios en precios es invariante a la inflación (5) se encontró una ligera rigidez a la baja (6) la sincronización de los cambios en los precios es baja (7) cerca del 32% del IPC corresponde a contratos de Taylor, 34% a otras reglas dependientes del tiempo y 34% a reglas dependientes del estado. Estos resultados proveen algunos fundamentales microeconómicos para el diseño de la política monetaria.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este artigo estuda a formação de preços dos varejistas de bens e serviços colombianos, baseado em 12.052.970 relatórios de preços dos artigos que conformam o IPC colombiano para o período de 1999.03 a 2008.05. Os principais resultados são resumidos como segue: (1) os preços ao consumidor na Colômbia são mais rígidos que os do Chile e de Portugal e poderiam ser mais flexíveis que aqueles da Eurozona. (2) Quarenta por cento das mudanças nos preços são reduções. (3) As mudanças absolutas nos preços são maiores que a inflação (4) Na Colômbia, quando a inflação se reduz: a rigidez dos preços aumenta, a variabilidade e o viés da distribuição das mudanças nos preços diminuem, e as rigidezes nominais em queda na frequência das mudanças nos preços é invariante à inflação (5) foi encontrada uma leve rigidez em queda (6) a sincronização das mudanças nos preços é baixa (7) aproximadamente 32% do IPC corresponde a contratos Taylor, 34% a outras regras dependentes do tempo e 34% a regras dependentes do Estado. Estes resultados fornecem alguns elementos fundamentais para o desenho da política monetária.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[price-setting behavior]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[sticky prices]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[CPI]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[comportamiento de fijación de precios]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[precios rígidos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[IPC]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[comportamento de fixação de preços]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[preços rígidos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[IPC]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p align="center"><font size="4" face="Verdana"><b>The Stickiness of Colombian Consumer Prices</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Rigideces de los Precios   al Consumidor Colombiano</b></font></p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Rigidezes dos Pre&ccedil;os   ao Consumidor Colombiano</b><b></b></font></p>       <p>&nbsp;</p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p><b>  Juan Manuel Julio, H&eacute;ctor Manuel Z&aacute;rate, Manuel Dar&iacute;o Hern&aacute;ndez* </b></p>     <p>* The authors work,   respectively: at   the Department of   Macroeconomic Models   and the Statistics Division   of the Banco de la Rep&uacute;blica.</p>     <p>Would like to thank   the anonymous referee   from the ESPE for his/her   insightful comments and   are deeply indebted to   Javier G&oacute;mez and Edgar   Caicedo from the Banco   de la Rep&uacute;blica for their   valuable comments and   suggestions of an earlier   version of this paper,   and to Eduardo Freire,   Technical Director of   the Colombian statistics   bureau, DANE, for his   valuable assistance   providing the dataset   under analysis. However,   any errors, results, and   opinions contained herein   are the sole responsibility   of the authors and do not   necessarily represent the   views of the Banco de la   Rep&uacute;blica or its Board of   Directors.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>E-mails:   <a href="mailto:jjulioro@banrep.gov.co">jjulioro@banrep.gov.co</a>;   <a href="mailto:hzaratso@banrep.gov.co">hzaratso@banrep.gov.co</a>;   <a href="mailto:mhernabe@banrep.gov.co">mhernabe@banrep.gov.co</a></p>     <p><b>Document</b> <b>received</b>: 10   may 2010; final version   <b>accepted</b>: 27 august 2010.</p> <hr size="1">     <p>The price setting behavior of Colombian retailers of   goods and services was studied based on a unique   dataset containing 12,052,970 individual price reports   covering all items in the Colombian CPI from   March 1999 to May 2008. The main results are   summarized as follows: 1. Colombian consumer   prices were found to be stickier than those in Chile   and Portugal and might be more flexible than those   in the Euro Area and some European countries. 2.   Price reductions are not rare. Forty percent of price   changes were found to be reductions. 3. Absolute   percentage price changes were found to be larger   than inflation. 4. As inflation is reduced in Colombia,   the following happens: (i) price stickiness   increases, (ii) the distribution of price stickiness   concentrates on the rigid side, (iii) the variability and   bias of the distribution of percentage price changes   decreases, and (iv), nominal downward rigidities in   the frequency of price changes are invariant to inflation.   5. A slight downward nominal price rigidity   was detected in the data. 6. Price change synchronization   was found to be low. 7. About 32% of the CPI   corresponds to Taylor contracts, 34% to other time   dependent rules and 34% to state dependent rules.   These findings provide some of the micro fundamentals   for the design of staggered contract models for monetary policy analysis in Colombia.</p>     <p><b>JEL Classification: </b>E31, E52, E58.</p> </font>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Keywords: </font></b>price-setting behavior, sticky prices, CPI.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> <hr size="1">     <p>En este art&iacute;culo se estudia la formaci&oacute;n de precios   de los minoristas de bienes y servicios colombianos   con base en 12.052.970 reportes de precios de los   art&iacute;culos que conforman el IPC colombiano para   el per&iacute;odo de 1999.03 a 2008.05. Los principales   resultados se resumen as&iacute;: (1) los precios al consumidor   de Colombia son m&aacute;s r&iacute;gidos que los de Chile   y Portugal y podr&iacute;an ser m&aacute;s flexibles que los del   Eurozona. (2) Cuarenta por ciento de los cambios   en los precios son reducciones (3) los cambios absolutos   en los precios son mayor que la inflaci&oacute;n   (4) cuando la inflaci&oacute;n se reduce en Colombia: la   rigidez de los precios se incrementa, la variabilidad   y sesgo de la distribuci&oacute;n de los cambios en   los precios disminuye y las rigideces nominales a   la baja en la frecuencia de los cambios en precios es   invariante a la inflaci&oacute;n (5) se encontr&oacute; una ligera   rigidez a la baja (6) la sincronizaci&oacute;n de los cambios   en los precios es baja (7) cerca del 32% del IPC corresponde   a contratos de Taylor, 34% a otras reglas   dependientes del tiempo y 34% a reglas dependientes   del estado. Estos resultados proveen algunos   fundamentales microecon&oacute;micos para el dise&ntilde;o de   la pol&iacute;tica monetaria.</p>     <p><b>Clasificaci&oacute;n JEL: </b>E31, E52, E58.</p> </font>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Palabras clave: </font></b>comportamiento de fijaci&oacute;n de   precios, precios r&iacute;gidos, IPC.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> <hr size="1">     <p>Este artigo estuda a forma&ccedil;&atilde;o de pre&ccedil;os dos varejistas   de bens e servi&ccedil;os colombianos, baseado   em 12.052.970 relat&oacute;rios de pre&ccedil;os dos artigos que   conformam o IPC colombiano para o per&iacute;odo de   1999.03 a 2008.05. Os principais resultados s&atilde;o resumidos   como segue: (1) os pre&ccedil;os ao consumidor   na Col&ocirc;mbia s&atilde;o mais r&iacute;gidos que os do Chile e de   Portugal e poderiam ser mais flex&iacute;veis que aqueles   da Eurozona. (2) Quarenta por cento das mudan&ccedil;as   nos pre&ccedil;os s&atilde;o redu&ccedil;&otilde;es. (3) As mudan&ccedil;as absolutas   nos pre&ccedil;os s&atilde;o maiores que a infla&ccedil;&atilde;o (4) Na Col&ocirc;mbia,   quando a infla&ccedil;&atilde;o se reduz: a rigidez dos pre&ccedil;os   aumenta, a variabilidade e o vi&eacute;s da distribui&ccedil;&atilde;o   das mudan&ccedil;as nos pre&ccedil;os diminuem, e as rigidezes   nominais em queda na frequ&ecirc;ncia das mudan&ccedil;as   nos pre&ccedil;os &eacute; invariante &agrave; infla&ccedil;&atilde;o (5) foi encontrada   uma leve rigidez em queda (6) a sincroniza&ccedil;&atilde;o das   mudan&ccedil;as nos pre&ccedil;os &eacute; baixa (7) aproximadamente   32% do IPC corresponde a contratos Taylor, 34% a   outras regras dependentes do tempo e 34% a regras   dependentes do Estado. Estes resultados fornecem   alguns elementos fundamentais para o desenho da pol&iacute;tica monet&aacute;ria.</p>     <p><b>Classifica&ccedil;&atilde;o JEL:</b> E31, E52, E58.</p> </font>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b><font size="3">Palavras chave:</font></b> comportamento de fixa&ccedil;&atilde;o de   pre&ccedil;os, pre&ccedil;os r&iacute;gidos, IPC.</font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> <hr size="1"> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>I. Introduction</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>One of the most important questions in macroeconomics is why monetary policy   has short to medium-term real effects on the economy? The answer is that there are   temporary price and wage rigidities. Prices are flexible if after an innovation, they   satisfy two conditions: (i) they shift towards the market-clearing levels and (ii) these   changes are synchronized among firms. If any of these conditions fail to happen, the   real effects of monetary policy arise. See Taylor (1999) and Blanchard (2008).   There is mounting international evidence on price rigidities. Following Means (1935),   researchers around the globe are studying price stickiness in the databases underlying   the calculation of producer and consumer price indexes. These analyzes are complemented   through surveys on the pricing practices of firms. The evidence is summarized   in the following stylized facts: (1) After an innovation to costs or demand, firms keep   their prices constant for extended periods of time. (2) There is a great deal of heterogeneity   in price setting. (3) Price changes are not synchronized. (4) Price stickiness relates   to inflation. See Blinder (1994), Taylor (1999), Altissimo et al. (2006), Alvarez et al.   (2005), Dhyne et al. (2006), Bils & Klenow (2004), Nakamura & Steinsson (2008), and   the references in <a href="#(tab1)">Table 1</a> for international evidence as well as Jaramillo & Cerquera   (1999), Espinosa, Jaramillo & Caicedo (2001), Misas, Lopez & Parra (2008), Hofstetter   (2008), and Julio & Z&aacute;rate (2008) for evidence in Colombia.</p>       <p align="center"><a name="(tab1)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab1.gif" /></a></p>     <p>This paper has three objectives: First, to determine whether or not price stickiness is   present in Colombian consumer prices. Second, to determine the empirical validity of common explanations and features of price stickiness theories in Colombia. And third, to establish the implications of the results, in terms of the micro fundamentals, for the design of <i>staggered contract models</i> for policy analysis in the country.</p>     <p>The first goal relates to the soundness of the framework that underlies monetary   policy models. In fact, monetary theory has shown that price stickiness is the source   of short to medium-term non-neutrality of monetary policy, and therefore, has a significant   effect on the response of key macroeconomic variables to economic shocks.   See Bils & Klenow (2004), Taylor (1980), and Rothemberg (1982).</p>     <p>More specifically, the response of inflation to marginal cost innovations and the optimal   response of monetary policy to particular shocks are heavily dependent on the   flexibility of prices. In fact, simple widespread theoretical models show that the degree   of price stickiness determines the slope of the New Keynesian Phillips curve and,   therefore, the response of inflation to marginal cost innovations. Hence, it is widely   acknowledged that &quot;the study of nominal price and wage setting is one of the hot topics   of macro today.&quot; See Blanchard (2008), Walsh (2003), and Angeloni et al. (2006).</p>     <p>The second goal has to do with the empirical validity of common theories explaining   price stickiness. Under rational expectations, price stickiness is the optimal   response of firms. Market structure theory proposes that firms with market power   keep their prices unchanged for long periods of time as it allows them to implement   price-smoothing policies. Under menu costs, firms keep their prices unchanged until   mark-up gain or loss is larger than these costs. In the manufacture level theory,   prices of items that require more manufacturing steps are stickier than items with   fewer manufacturing steps because of &quot;snake effects, i.e., [unsynchronized] movements   in factor prices slowly transmitted to intermediate and final good prices.&quot; See   Blanchard (1982).</p>     <p>The third goal relates to the features of the models and the stylized facts of the economy   they are meant to reproduce. <i>Staggered contract models</i> focus on the nature   of the price decision itself and, due to their mathematical complexity, rely on fairly   simple and unrealistic price-setting rules. The assumptions of representative firms,   homogeneous goods and the use of Taylor contracts and Calvo pricing are common in these models<a href="#1" name="n1"><sup>1</sup></a>. . See Taylor (1980) and Calvo (1983).</p>     <p></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In this paper, the price-setting behavior of Colombian goods and services retailers   is studied based on a unique dataset that contains 12,052,970 monthly price reports covering the entire CPI from March 1999 to May 2008.</p>     <p>Our dataset compares well with those in a set of individual country studies and the   Euro Area reviewed in <a href="#(tab1)">Table 1</a>. The coverage of our dataset, 100% of the CPI, is only   matched by the study done in Chile. With respect to the size (number of records),   our dataset is larger than all the datasets except for those used in the studies done in   France and Belgium. Moreover, the time span (10 years) covered by our dataset is only matched by the time spans covered in Brazil and Mexico.</p>     <p>The size and coverage of this dataset is unprecedented in sticky-price studies for Colombia.   Jaramillo & Cerquera (1999) studied weekly price reports from June 1991 to   February 1994 on 39 food items, less than 20% of the Colombian CPI basket, from 5   hypermarkets in a small, Colombian city. Espinosa, Jaramillo & Caicedo (2001) studied   daily price quotes on 209 goods from 1989 to 1999 reported by one supermarket   in Bogot&aacute;. Their sample covered about 30% of the CPI. More recently, Hofstetter   (2008) studied the stickiness of a set of monthly newspaper and magazine prices, which is less than 0.25% of the Colombian CPI basket, between 1960 and 2005.</p>     <p>The dataset presents other important features. First of all, it covers the time when   Colombia was closest to its 3% long-run target, which makes our results useful for   the final stage of the inflation stabilization program and after its goals have finally   been achieved. Secondly, it contains a period of decreasing inflation, March 1999   to June 2006, and one of increasing inflation, June 2006 to May 2008. This feature   provides enough sample variation to explore the relationship between inflation and   the distribution of the Frequency of Price Changes, FPC (See Julio & Z&aacute;rate, 2008), over time.</p>     <p>However, the database does not identify sales offered to the general public (in   contrast to known clientele) for more than a day. This fact reduces our measures of price spell duration; thus, our estimates are a lower limit to the true price stickiness   in Colombia.</p>     <p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section II we describe the   dataset, the CPI weighing structure, and the methodology. In Section III we summarize   the stylized facts on price stickiness in Colombian CPI prices. In Section IV   we conclude and present a brief discussion and directions for future research.</p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>II. Methodology and the Data Set</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>In this section the dataset under analysis, the definitions, and previous treatment of   the dataset are described. In Subsection A the dataset and the basic definitions for   our analysis are described. In Subsection B the CPI weighing composition and some   methodological issues are summarized.</p>     <p><b>A. The Micro Data Underl ying the Colombian CPI</b></p>     <p>Following Aucremane & Dhyne (2004) and Julio & Z&aacute;rate (2008), we defined<i> a particular   item</i> as a unique good or service with a clearly defined brand, presentation,   and unit of measure along with other features. A minimal class is the smallest basket   of items for which the CPI is statistically representative for each of the cities and   levels of income considered by DANE, the Colombian statistics bureau.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i> A price spell</i> is defined as an uninterrupted sequence of price reports associated with   one particular item during which the price remains constant. Thus, a price spell is   an episode of fixed prices that can be described in terms of three elements: the date   of the first quote, the price level, and the duration of the spell. <i>A price sequence</i> is a continuous progression of price reports belonging to a particular item.</p>     <p>The original dataset consisted of 9,330,000 price reports gathered by DANE to calculate   the Colombian CPI. These reports are scattered among 176 minimal classes.   The dataset spans the period from March 1999 to May 2008, and averages 80,431   price reports per month. Minimal classes contain, on average, seven particular items   each. Moreover, the dataset covers 100% of the Colombian CPI goods and services.   In this study, 3,252,930 price spells were identified, that is, an average of 72 price spells per minimal class.</p>     <p>Each of the price quotes in the dataset is accompanied by the following information:   the minimal class code, a unique code that identifies a particular item within each   minimal class, the city the retailer is located in, the socioeconomic category of the   area served by the retailer, a unique informant code within each city, the report frequency,   and the type of outlet. In addition, there is a set of indicator variables for the   following events: the imputation of non-reported prices, the change of item features,   product turnover, and a code to indicate that the record was used in the calculation   of the CPI. Unfortunately, the dataset does not include a control variable to indicate   the VAT reforms. Consequently, the FPC for January 2001, when these changes took place, could be slightly overestimated.</p>     <p>Based on all the information from the dataset, the price sequences were determined.   <a href="#(gra1)">Graph 1</a> displays two price sequences related to potatoes at a particular hypermarket   and a fresh food market.</p>       <p align="center"><a name="(gra1)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra1.gif" /></a></p>     <p>Price quotes gathered by DANE correspond mostly to transaction prices and are   collected at different frequencies as required by the CPI administrator. Collection   frequencies extend up to once every four months, but 53.1% of the quotes correspond   to records collected monthly. Price quotes recorded less frequently were carried   forward until the next collection date. After this expansion, the database ended   up with 12,052,970 records. The distribution of price records by type of record and frequency of reporting is given in <a href="#(tab2)">Table 2</a>.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="(tab2)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab2.gif" /></a></p>     <p>In order to obtain robust and reliable estimates, prior processing of the dataset was done   following the guidelines of Julio & Z&aacute;rate (2008). Price reports displaying unrealistic prices (outliers) and prices not used for the CPI calculation were deleted. At the same time, product turnover induced new price sequences and missing reports within product sequences were carried forward for three months at most. The extent of our imputation was below 1% of the total sample.</p>     <p>An important feature of our dataset is that 44.1% of the price quotes belong to food   items. Given that food is just 30% of the Colombian CPI, there is a significant oversampling   of food items. Therefore, our estimates are weighted according to the CPI   weighting system. The rest of the price quotes are distributed as follows: 9% correspond   to apparel and 46.9% to other groups, such as recreation and culture, housing,   medical care, education, transportation and communications, and other expenditure.   The composition of the final dataset under analysis is provided in <a href="#(tab3)">Table 3</a>.</p>       <p align="center"><a name="(tab3)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab3.gif" /></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>B. Methodology</b></p>     <p>Summary statistics presented in this paper are similar to those reported in individual   country studies of the Inflation Persistence Network, IPN. A detailed description of   these statistics may be found in Aucremane & Dhyne (2004). Each month, the Frequency   of Price Changes, FPC, is calculated for each particular item as the ratio of   the number of price changes to the number of valid price records. Aggregate measures   related to the FPC are calculated using the CPI weights, and the implied duration   of price spells is determined as the inverse of the FPC. A detailed explanation of the   Colombian weighting system can be found in DANE (2002).</p>     <p>In this paper, price rigidity is studied using the distributions of FPCs at the level of   minimal classes as the starting point. The distribution of the FPCs corresponds to the   collection of the FPCs and weights of the 176 minimal classes of the Colombian CPI.   The distributions for each month in the sample and the sample aggregate are studied.   Summary statistics, i.e., the mean, median, quartiles, and percentiles of the distribution   of the FPCs are calculated using the CPI weights. Moreover, the distribution of   implied durations can also be estimated by calculating the duration implied by the FPC for each minimal class.</p>     <p>The distribution of price records by type of retailer is given in <a href="#(tab4)">Table 4</a>. About half   of the price records, 49.6%, are recorded in supermarkets and specialty stores, while   only 2.1% come from hypermarkets.</p>       <p align="center"><a name="(tab4)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab4.gif" /></a></p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>III. Results</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p><b>  A. Price Stickiness</b></p>     <p>In order to determine how sticky Colombian consumer prices are, the median Frequency   of Price Changes, FPC, was calculated for increasingly aggregated baskets   starting with product categories. Statistics at aggregate levels employ the weighting structure underlying the calculation of the Colombian CPI.</p>     <p>Results are summarized in distributions of FPC and the corresponding distributions   of durations of price spells. The distribution for the sample aggregate was studied.   However, given that our sample is not homogeneous as inflation has not been on a   steady path, they were also studied for each period of time in the sample.</p>     <p>In addition, since prices of imputed rent (the rent prices of owner-occupied housing)   are somewhat controversial and, therefore, usually excluded from individual country   studies, results with and without these items are provided. Finally, the distributions of the FPC for goods and services were studied.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In Subsection III.A.1 sample aggregate results are reviewed and in Subsection III.A.2 time series results are summarized.</p>     <p><b>  1. Sample Aggregate Results</b></p>     <p><a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra2.gif" target="_blank">Graph 2</a> displays the distribution of the Frequency of Price Changes, FPC, (top panel)   and the distribution of the implied duration of price spells for all items (bottom   panel). The bars (left scale) indicate CPI weight and the continuous line (right scale) corresponds to cumulative weights.</p>     <p>The distribution of the FPC (top panel) is skewed to the right where low frequencies   of price changes (high implied durations) are located. This corresponds to a distribution   of implied durations (bottom panel) skewed to the left. Forty-one percent of the   CPI has an implied duration of more than 10 months. The implied duration of 50% of   the CPI is more than 8.4 months and the implied duration of 65% of it the CPI is more   than 5.0 months. Therefore, just 35% of the Colombian CPI has an implied duration   of less than 5.0 months.</p>     <p>Skewness to the left in the distribution of durations relates to an excess weight of   items displaying durations of between 7 and 13 months. These items correspond   mainly to rent, food away from home, apparel, ground transportation, and other expenditure,   in that order. Items displaying durations of between 7 and 13 months show a surprising weight of 45.5% of the CPI.</p>     <p>The combined weight of items with durations falling into the 7 to 12 month interval is   23.9% and corresponds to all food away from home items, most of the apparel items,   all ground transportation items, and some other expenditure items with weights of 6.45%, 6.30%, 4.5%, and 3.2% of the CPI, respectively.</p>     <p>By the same token, the combined weight of items which have price spell durations that   fall into the 12 to 13 month interval is 21.6% of the CPI and corresponds to rent and   imputed rent items whose weights are 5.0% and 15.6% of the CPI, respectively. Current   regulations in Colombia restrict housing rent to once a year increases, at most, and to   an amount not higher than the CPI inflation. Therefore, housing rent contracts typically last one year, which corresponds to our duration estimate for these items.</p>     <p>Except for the behavior of imputed rent items, the shape of the distribution of implied   durations in <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra2.gif" target="_blank">Graph 2</a> resembles the one found in Belgium. Unfortunately, comparison   to the duration distribution of other countries is not possible as their studies show the   unweighted distribution of durations, which have a shape that reflects sample imbalances with respect to the CPI weights.</p>     <p><a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab5.gif" target="_blank">Table 5</a> displays the distribution of the FPC for all CPI items, the main groups of the   CPI classification, all CPI items excluding imputed rent, and all CPI items classified as   either goods or services. Distributions are described through percentiles and quartiles   as well as their means, standard deviations, and implied median durations.</p>     <p>The median product category in the CPI changes its price 11.9% each month, which corresponds   to a median implied price spell duration of 8.4 months. In other words, 50%   of the Colombian CPI has a duration of more than 8.4 months, while the remaining   50% shows durations of less than 8.4 months. Moreover, the mean FPC for all items is 21.1% a month, an implied mean duration of 4.7 months.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The more flexible items correspond to household utilities, perishable food, transportation   combustibles, and airfare; the less flexible items correspond to services based on   long-term relationship with customers, LTR. Items such as tomatoes, potatoes, oranges,   onions, etc. as well as electricity, water supply, transportation fuel, and airfare   have durations of less than 2 months. Durations of higher than 1.5 years are associated   with video rental, other services, tailor services, apparel rental, apparel tailoring, apparel   repair, and gambling, in that order. These findings resemble those of the Euro Area,   Dhyne et al. (2006), and the US, Bils & Klenow (2004).</p>     <p>The most flexible group is food and the least flexible is education. <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab5.gif" target="_blank">Table 5 </a>shows that   the median implied duration for food is 3.3 months. This is explained by the fact that   66% of food corresponds to perishable and semi-processed items, which have price   spell durations that tend to be short. The median implied duration for education is 16   months. Education contains a diverse set of goods and services related to school and   college education. In Colombia preschool, elementary school, middle school and high   school tuition is distributed as a yearly fee and equal monthly payments throughout   the school year. The prices of these items along with those of school uniforms, all of which total 56% of education, have a median implied duration of close to 16 months.</p>     <p>Not surprisingly, the prices of housing and medical care items show durations of closer   to a year, 12.5 and 13.1 months, respectively. In fact, 70% of housing corresponds   to imputed rent and effective rent items, which have implied durations of 12 months.   Moreover, the durations of price spells for health items are spread over a wide range of 4.1 to 18.3 months.</p>     <p>The prices of transportation and communications and recreation and culture items show   durations of 6.0 and 6.7 months, respectively. About 46.0% of transportation and communications   corresponds to transportation fuel, airfare, fixed phone service, and automobiles,   which have durations of 1.3, 2.0, 2.8, and 4.3 months, respectively. Moreover, 72% percent of recreation and culture corresponds to TV sets, newspapers, tourism,   small electronics, stereo sets, books, and movies, with durations of 5.1, 5.5, 5.7, 5.7, 5.9,   6.4, and 6.7 months, respectively. The rest of recreation and culture items are spread out   over a long range of durations lasting from 6.7 to 50.1 months.</p>     <p>Consumer price stickiness is reduced when imputed rent items are excluded from the calculation.   The share of imputed rent items in the CPI is a non-negligible 15.6%, and prices   of these items have durations of 12 months. By excluding imputed rent, the median implied   duration falls to 6.4 months and the mean implied duration drops to 4.25 months<a href="#2" name="n2"><sup>2</sup></a>.</p>     <p>Moreover, prices are more flexible for goods than for services and the duration   distribution for goods has a smaller spread than that for services. The median   implied price spell durations of goods and services are 4.9 and 10.2 months, respectively,   and the 90% percentile ranks of durations are 11 and 18.1, respectively.   These results are similar to those in other countries. See Bils & Klenow (2004) for the US and Dias et al. (2004) for Portugal, for instance.</p>     <p>Differences between the distributions of price spell durations of goods and services   relate to price regulations on services, the nature of the service, the share   of wages, and rent in the cost structure of service providers and seasonality.   Services contain a wide array of items which weights are unevenly distributed   throughout duration, as shown above. Price regulation induces a short duration   of price spells in utilities and transportation combustibles, which also have a   significant share of the CPI weight. Price regulation induces long price spell durations   in ground transportation and education. Prices of food away from home   items might have long durations because the cost structure of these outlets includes   an influential share of wages and rent, two items with durations that are close to a year.</p>     <p><a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a> displays a summary of the results of a set of studies on price stickiness   of consumer prices carried out for individual countries and the Euro Area. The table includes the results for the average FPC, FPC heterogeneity, downward   price rigidity, price change synchronization, the percentage size of increases and   decreases, and the dependency of price rules on state and time factors.   The coverage of CPI items in the individual country studies in <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a> is not homogeneous   nor is the prevailing inflation during the sample. Therefore, comparison   of price stickiness between countries is quite difficult but it is customarily   done as an indication of relative stickiness.</p>     <p>Given that inflation relates to price stickiness in Colombia (as will be seen in   the next subsection), a comparison to countries having lower inflation rates is   straightforward as long as the samples under analysis cover similar shares of the   CPI in each study. The coverage of our dataset is similar to the coverage of the   databases studied in Chile and Portugal, which also included shelter.   Colombian consumer prices are clearly less flexible than those of Chile and Portugal.   Chilean consumer prices are surprisingly flexible, a mean FPC of 46.1% a   month, given the inflation prevailing during the sample, which was 2.7%. Even   after removing imputed rent items, the mean FPC of Colombian consumer prices,   23.6% a month, is still lower than Chile&#39;s. Moreover, when Colombia reaches   the same level of inflation as Chile, the stickiness of Colombian consumer prices will be higher than that shown in the sample aggregate<a href="#3" name="n3"><sup>3</sup></a>.  Likewise, the   mean FPC in Portugal is 21.1% a month, a result that is similar to ours. Given   that Portugal&#39;s study also includes rent and since stickiness relates inversely to   inflation in Colombia, when Colombia reaches the level of inflation Portugal has,   that is, an average of 2.6%, Colombian consumer prices will be less flexible than   those of Portugal.</p>     <p></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Comparison to the aggregate results of other individual country studies is difficult   because of sample coverage differences. However, a raw comparison with the results   of Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the Euro Area might suggest that Colombian consumer prices are more flexible than those of these countries.</p>     <p><b>  2. Time Series Results</b></p>     <p><b>  a. Inflation and the Location of the Distribution of the FPC</b></p>     <p>Price stickiness relates inversely to inflation in Colombia. <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra3.gif" target="_blank">Graph 3</a> shows the relationship   between inflation and consumer price stickiness. The left panel displays the   relationship between inflation and the seasonally adjusted median FPC<a href="#4" name="n4"><sup>4</sup></a>. The right   panel displays the relationship between inflation and the seasonally adjusted implied   median duration of price spells for each period of time. Each point corresponds to a   particular month in the sample.</p>     <p>We found a statistically significant correlation of -0.6 between CPI inflation and   the seasonally adjusted median implied duration. When inflation was reduced   from 10% in May 1999 to 4% in May 2006, the median implied duration of price   spells increased from 6 to 10 months. When inflation went back up to 5.7% in   April 2008, the median implied duration of price spells decreased to 9.6 months.</p>     <p>A similar analysis follows for the median FPC on the left panel. Therefore, when   Colombian CPI infl ation reaches the long-run target of 3%, the median FPC will   likely be between 9% and 10% a month, a median implied duration of between 10 and 12 months.</p>     <p>This fi nding is consistent with previous CPI and PPI stickiness studies for Colombia   and is a recognized empirical fact worldwide. In a period when the average CPI infl ation   was 28%, Jaramillo & Cerquera (1999) found that CPI prices remained constant   for two months. Espinosa, Jaramillo & Caicedo (2001) found that duration increased   to four months when the average CPI infl ation fell to 25%. Our results show a median   implied duration of 8.4 months for a period when the CPI infl ation was 7% on   the average. A similar result for Colombian producer prices was found by Julio &   Z&aacute;rate (2008), and analogous results are widespread in cross country comparisons and individual country studies. See Golosov & Lucas (2007), for instance.</p>     <p>The fact that infl ation relates to price stickiness contradicts time-dependent rules.   Under Calvo pricing, for instance, fi rms update their prices based on an exogenous   constant hazard and decide only on the size of the price change. Under state-dependent   rules, such as menu costs, fi rms which prices are most &quot;out of line&quot; are more   likely to change their prices; thus, the timing of a price change relates to infl ation.   Therefore, this evidence suggests that state dependency is an infl uential component   of the price-setting behavior in Colombian consumer prices.</p>     <p>Taylor (1999) identifi es the relationship between infl ation and price stickiness as &quot;a   stylized fact in market economies&quot;, and Golosov & Lucas (2007) argue that this relationship is a major criticism against Calvo pricing under menu costs.</p>     <p><b>  b. Inflation and the Variability of the Distributions of the FPC and   Percetage Price Change</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Infl ation relates directly to the variability of the FPC and percentage price change   distributions. <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra4.gif" target="_blank">Graph 4</a> portrays the relationship between infl ation and the variability   of the FPC (left panel), and infl ation and the variability of percentage price changes   (right panel). Variability is measured as the seasonally adjusted 90% inter-percentile   rank (the difference between the 95% and 5% percentiles) of the corresponding distribution.   Each point corresponds to a month in the sample.</p>     <p>According to Friedman (1977), when infl ation is related to infl ation variability, welfare   losses due to this relationship diminish as infl ation goes down. A statistically   signifi cant correlation of 0.44 between infl ation and the seasonally adjusted variability   of percentage price changes was found. Therefore, as infl ation is reduced in   Colombia, so are the welfare losses due to this relationship. This fi nding supports the   choice of low, stable infl ation in Colombia. See Partow (1995), also.</p>     <p>The variability of price stickiness diminishes along with infl ation; therefore, durations   tend to concentrate on long values. In fact, a statistically signifi cant correlation of 0.47 between infl ation and the seasonally adjusted variability of the FPC was found. This   fi nding, along with the fact that infl ation relates to price stickiness, means that as infl ation falls, the distribution of durations concentrates around long values.</p>     <p><b>  c. Inflation and the Skewnwaa of the distributions of the FPC and   Percentage Price Change</b></p>     <p>As infl ation drops, the lack of symmetry in percentage price changes diminish but   downward nominal rigidities in FPC do not. <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra5.gif" target="_blank">Graph 5</a> displays the relationship between   infl ation and the skewness of the FPC distribution (left panel), and infl ation   and the skewness of the distribution of percentage price changes (right panel). Skewness   is measured as the seasonally adjusted difference between the mean and median   of the corresponding distribution. Each point in either Graph corresponds to a month   in the sample.</p>     <p>As infl ation goes downward, price rigidity due to lack of FPC symmetry remains   unchanged. The skewness of the FPC distribution is invariant to infl ation variations   as the correlation between infl ation and the skewness of the FPC distribution is not statistically signifi cant.</p>     <p>However, downward price rigidity in percentage price changes tends to diminish as   infl ation falls. There is a statistically signifi cant correlation of 0.40 between infl ation and the skewness of the distribution of percentage price changes. Therefore, as inflation   drops, the distribution of percentage price changes tends to symmetry.</p>     <p><b>  d. Inflation and the FPC of Flexible Item</b></p>     <p>The price spell duration of flexible items is invariant to inflation. <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra6.gif" target="_blank">Graph 6</a> illustrates   the relationship between inflation (right scale on each panel) and the seasonally adjusted   FPC of potatoes, electricity, and transportation fuel, in that order (left scale   on each panel). The flexibility of the prices of these items remains regardless of inflation.   Variations of the FPC of electricity and transportation fuel at the beginning   of the sample relate to changes in regulation. Therefore, movement and clustering of   items along the FPC axis, as inflation is reduced, happens for items with prices that are sticky already. A similar result was found by Bils & Klenow (2004) for the US.</p>     <p><b>  e. Seasonality</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Differing degrees of seasonality are present in the median FPC of all CPI groups   in Colombia, which points to significant time dependency in the pricing rules of   Colombian retailers. <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra7.gif" target="_blank">Graph 7</a> displays the median FPC (continuous line) and the seasonally adjusted median FPC (dashed line) for the main groups of the CPI.</p>     <p>Strong seasonality in the FPC arises in regulated services and this increases price   change synchronization for services. Price changes in education related goods and   services gather during school registration. About 85% of the price changes observed   every year in this group happen during the first quarter while most of the rest occur in   August and September. Likewise, 37% of the price changes observed in health related   goods and services during the year occur during the first quarter and the other 63% of   these are spread out over the rest of the year. A similar pattern arises for transportation   and communications items. Therefore, strong price change synchronization related to seasonality may be expected in these groups, especially in education.</p>     <p>Important seasonal patterns in the FPC also arise in goods such as food. The frequency   of price changes for food items increases smoothly from October to March and then goes down again following the same pattern throughout the rest of the year.</p>     <p>Slight seasonality also appears in the FPC of other goods and services, housing,   apparel, recreation and culture, and other expenditure. Seasonal increases in the FPC in these groups occur between January and April each year. Moreover, the seasonal   peak in the FPC of apparel items has been shifting from March to April while at the   same time its size has been falling over time.</p>     <p>Previous results are summarized in <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra8.gif" target="_blank">Graph 8,</a> where the distributions of percentage   price changes (top panel) and the distributions of FPC (bottom panel) are displayed   over time. Each panel shows the evolution of the main quartiles and percentiles of the corresponding distribution.</p>     <p>The distributions of percentage price changes show clear, seasonal increases in their   variability during the fi rst quarter of the year with a small, seasonal increase sometime   during the rest of the year. Likewise, the distributions of the FPC show seasonal   shifts in their skewness, median, and variability during the fi rst semester of the year.   Therefore, there is a signifi cant level of time dependency in the pricing rules of Colombian   retailers.</p>     <p><b>B. Heterogeneit y of the Fre quenc y of Price Changes</b></p>     <p>According to Taylor (1999), a stylized fact of market economies is a great deal of heterogeneity   in price-setting rules. Our results show a sizable degree of heterogeneity   in the FPCs between product classes and categories of CPI items. For instance, the   90% inter-percentile rank of the implied duration for the CPI is 16.4-1.4=15 months.   This contrasts sharply with the surprisingly low 90% inter-percentile rank of the implied duration for apparel of 3.38 months.</p>     <p>There are several theories that explain price stickiness heterogeneity, i.e., market   structure and level of processing of goods. Both of these theories match our   results nicely, particularly for goods. In addition, the source of goods also plays an influential role.</p>     <p>In order to explain price stickiness heterogeneity in Colombian consumer prices,   a &quot;stickiness homogenizing classification&quot; is built in II.B.1 and matched in II.B.2 to the two theories explaining price stickiness heterogeneity mentioned above.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>  1. The Stickiness Homogenizing Classification</b></p>     <p>To understand the heterogeneity of stickiness in the minimal classes, a cluster analysis   on the median FPC of the minimal classes was performed<a href="#5" name="n5"><sup>5</sup></a>. For this classification,   goods and services were treated separately and goods were split into food and nonfood   items. Rent was studied separately because its duration is clearly influenced   by the length of rent contracts and because of the imputed rent measurement issue.   Clusters are studied and matched with groups from various classifications. Once   matches were made, the clusters were redefined. Therefore, overlapping is unavoidable,   but the redefinition provides economic meaning to our stickiness homogenizing classification.</p>     <p><a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab7.gif" target="_blank">Table 7</a> shows the distribution of the FPC by the groups derived from the redefinition   of groups that were the result of the cluster analysis on price stickiness.</p>     <p>Food items are classified into four groups: perishable food, semi-processed food,   processed food, and food away from home, with very low overlapping. Perishable   food items such as tomatoes, potatoes, oranges, onions, etc. have flexible prices that   last between 1.3 and 1.9 months. Prices of semi-processed food items such as bread,   cooking oil, sugar, poultry, fish, meat, milk, eggs, etc. show median implied durations   of between 1.9 and 3.4 months. Prices of processed food items, i.e., cornstarch   and other flours, breakfast cereals, canned and dried food, frozen meals, chocolate,   spaghetti, juice, soft drinks, and other nonalcoholic beverages have median implied   durations of between 3.4 and 6.6 months. Finally, the price spell durations of food   away from home items cluster together in a range of 7.5 to 12.2 months.   Non-food items are classified into three groups: consumables, durables and apparel,   with some overlapping. The price spell durations of consumable items such as   house cleaning and personal care supplies, cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, etc. tend   to cluster together in the implied duration interval between 0.0 and 5.0 months. The   duration of price spells for durable items, for example, home appliances, linen, home   electronics, home furniture, household utensils, etc. tend to concentrate in the implied   duration interval of 6.0 months and above. Minor overlapping (the range between   5.0 and 6.0 months) relates to the duration of price spells for durable items   (i.e., other transportation vehicles, some home appliances, and tires) and consumable   items (i.e., medicine, beer, cleaning utensils, personal care items, diapers, floor wax,   and newspapers). Strong overlapping of the distribution of consumables and durables   is explained by one single item, automobiles, a durable with an implied duration of   just 4.3 months. Because of the influential weight of automobiles, which is 3% of   the CPI and 43% of durables, the distribution of the price spell duration of durables   strongly overlaps the distribution of consumables. Surprisingly, the duration of price   spells for apparel items clusters tightly together in the implied duration interval between 8.8 and 12.9 months, with almost all of them within the 9.4 to 10.7 month range.</p>     <p>Consumer services, excluding rent, classify into six clearly differentiated groups:   services related to unit production cost, transportation and communications, other   services, personal services, education and health, and services related to long-term   relationships with customers. Services related to unit production costs, such as utilities,   transportation fuel, and airfare have prices with durations of less than 2.8   months. Most of the weight of the transportation and communication items is   concentrated in price spell durations of between 7 to 10 months. The duration   of price spells for other services is spread over a wide range of between 5.7 and   10.8 months. Prices of personal services, i.e., post and parcel, domestic service,   and photography have durations of between 11.3 and 15.9 months. The duration of price spells for education and health services is spread over a wide range but   their weight is concentrated within 11.0 and 18.9 months of duration. Prices of   services related to long-term relationship with customers exhibit durations of   more than 18.9 months. Rent is treated separately from other services as the duration   of effective measurements of rent prices (5.05% of CPI) is highly influenced   by the duration of rent contracts and because imputed rent (15.6% of CPI)   prices are not observable.</p>     <p><b>  2. Explaining Price Stickiness Heterogeneity in Colombian Consumer   Price</b></p>     <p>It may be possible to interpret the stickiness homogenizing classification of goods   through the market structure and level of processing theories of price stickiness heterogeneity.   Moreover, the source of goods also plays an important role since prices of   imports are more flexible than produced and consumed goods. In addition, the heterogeneity   of price stickiness of services relates strongly to regulation and the stickiness of cost innovations.</p>     <p>The results of <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab7.gif" target="_blank">Table 7</a> seem to agree with the level of processing theory for goods. According   to this theory, price stickiness relates to the number of manufacturing steps required   to produce goods. This fact is clearly true for food items except food away from   home and seems to be true also for non-food items such as durables. These, because of their nature, might be subject to more manufacturing than consumables.</p>     <p>At the same time, according to the market structure theory, price stickiness relates   to the market power of firms. This explanation seems to agree with the classification of food and non-food items.</p>     <p>However, the source of goods might also help explain the heterogeneity. For consumable   and durable items, prices of imports are more flexible than prices of produced   and consumed goods. In fact, consumable items, such as hair shampoo, detergent, alcoholic   beverages other than beer, oral care goods, and insecticide, which are mostly   imports, display lower price spell durations than wax, newspaper, magazines, and   books, which are mostly produced and consumed goods. Moreover, durable goods   with a high share of imports, i.e., automobiles, home appliances, and home electronics   show lower price spell durations than linen, curtains, home furnishing, furniture,   pillows, and mattresses, which account for a lower share of imports. Similarly, the stickiness of prices for apparel seems to agree with this explanation since apparel   items are mostly produced and consumed goods.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>This evidence matches the results obtained by Julio & Z&aacute;rate (2008) nicely. They   found that the median price spell durations for imports and produced and consumed   industrial goods were 4.05 and 6.50 months, respectively. <a href="#(tab8)">Table 8</a> shows the median   FPC for final consumption producer prices by source of goods and industry.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="(tab8)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab8.gif" /></a></p>     <p>A comparison of the results from <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab7.gif" target="_blank">tables 7</a> and <a href="#(tab8)">8</a> reveals that there are important similarities   between the behavior of producer and consumer prices in Colombia. The median   implied duration of consumables, durables, and apparel (all of which contain imports   and produced and consumed items) are 5.0, 5.1 and 10.3, respectively. These durations,   taken together, are similar to the price spell durations of final consumption manufacturing   items of the PPI, which are 3.9 months for imports and 8.0 for produced and consumed goods. Likewise, the median implied duration of price spells for perishable   food, 1.5 months, is remarkably similar to the duration of produced and consumed final   consumption agricultural items in the PPI, which is 1.4 months.</p>     <p>In contrast, the heterogeneity of price stickiness in services relates strongly to price   regulations and the stickiness of marginal cost innovations. Services tied to unit   production costs, for example, utilities, transportation fuel, and airfare are subject   to frequent price changes as unit production costs are updated often. The effects of   regulation and the nature of the service on price stickiness are also clear for education   services, in which price changes concentrate during school registration, and for transportation and communications services, where price changes are tied to regulation.</p>     <p>The heterogeneity of price stickiness of non-regulated services obeys different factors.   Services related to long-term relationship with customers, such as apparel tailor,   apparel repair, apparel rental, haircut, etc. may have long durations because, in these   markets, the customer is not anonymous and may resist price changes. See Dhyne et al. (2006) and Bils & Klenow (2004) for evidence from the Euro Area and the US.</p>     <p><b>  C. Price Change Synchronization</b></p>     <p>Prices are flexible if they satisfy two conditions after an innovation: (i) they shift towards   the market-clearing level and (ii) price change is synchronized among firms. Therefore,   lack of price change synchronization indicates the existence of price stickiness. The   synchronization of price changes was measured by means of the Fisher & Konieczni   (2000) synchronization index. The synchronization index is one under perfect synchronization   and zero under perfect staggering. The synchronization index for all items as well as for each group in the stickiness homogenizing classification was calculated.</p>     <p>Measures of price change synchronization reveal significant features of the pricesetting   rules used by retailers. In Calvo pricing, for instance, the timing of price   changes follow a constant hazard and are thus unsynchronized, i.e., staggered. In   Taylor contracts, in contrast, prices change at deterministic lengths of time inducing perfect synchronization.</p>     <p><a href="#(gra9)">Graph 9</a> depicts the distribution of the Fisher-Konieczni synchronization index for   the minimal classes of the Colombian CPI. Vertical bars and the continuous line indicate   CPI weight for each interval and the cumulative weight, respectively.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="(gra9)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra9.gif" /></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a href="#(gra9)">Graph 9</a> reveals that, throughout the sample aggregate, price change synchronization   in Colombia is low and comparable in degree to the individual country studies in   <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a> except for Chile. The median minimal class in Colombian consumer prices has a synchronization index of 0.147. Moreover, 80% of the CPI has a synchronization   index which is below 0.38 and just 10% of the basket has one above 0.463. The   remarkably high FPC found in Chile induces a synchronization index of 0.37.</p>     <p><a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra10.gif" target="_blank">Graph 10</a> shows the distribution of the Fisher-Konieczni synchronization index for   each group of the stickiness homogenizing classifi cation. Vertical bars indicate CPI weight for each interval.</p>     <p>Not surprisingly, strong price change synchronization is found in regulated services   such as education and health and transportation and communications. Moreover,   services tied to unitary production costs reveal strong price change synchronization   as their FPC rank among the highest in the CPI basket. As expected, very low price   change synchronization is found in rent, food, apparel, services related to long-term   relationships with customers, and consumable items. Slightly high price change synchronization   is seen in durables and other services, which relates to price change synchronization for automobiles and banking services, respectively.</p>     <p>A Taylor contract of one year might be a good approximation of the pricing rules of   regulated services such as education, health, transportation, and communications   and rent, which is a surprising 32% of the CPI.</p>     <p><b>D. FREQUENCY OF PRICE INCREASES AND REDUCTIONS</b></p>     <p>Strong downward nominal price rigidities increase welfare losses of infl ation-reducing   policies. When prices are downwardly rigid, monetary policies to reduce infl ation   have stronger real effects on the economy than policies to increase infl ation. In   order to determine the presence of nominal downward price rigidity, the frequency   of price increases is compared to that of reductions at the level of minimal classes   in <a href="#(gra11)">Graph 11</a>. Each point in the graph corresponds to a minimal class in the sample.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="(gra11)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra11.gif" /></a></p>     <p>The existence of slight nominal downward price rigidity in Colombian consumer   prices can be deduced from <a href="#(gra11)">Graph 11</a>. Most of the minimal classes in the CPI display   a frequency of increases close to, but slightly higher than, the frequency of decreases.   Therefore, most of the cloud of points is located close the 45-degree line where they would lie in the absence of nominal rigidities.</p>     <p>Strong downward nominal price rigidities are seen in transportation fuel, utilities,   and airfare. However, these minimal classes were shown to be fl exible; therefore,   high costs of reducing infl ation are compensated by low stickiness. Moreover, very   slight nominal upward price rigidity appears in home electronics and onion.</p>     <p>Colombian consumer prices show lower downward nominal price rigidities than   consumer prices in several countries. <a href="#(gra11)">Graph 11</a> shows a higher concentration of points around the 45-degree line than the figures reported in the studies carried out   in Belgium, France, and Portugal, for instance. See Aucremane & Dhyne (2004,   <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra6.gif" target="_blank">Graph 6</a>), Baudry et al. (2004), and Dias et al. (2004).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Finally, price reductions are not rare. We found that 40% of price changes correspond   to reductions. Similar results were found by Espinosa, Jaramillo & Caicedo (2001)   for Colombian consumer prices, by Baudry et al. (2004) for France, and by Dhyne   et al. (2006) for the Euro Area (see <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a>). This is a key parameter for calibrating menu cost models. See Nakamura & Steinsson (2008), for instance.</p>     <p><b>  E. The Size of Price Changes	</b></p>     <p>A common explanation for price stickiness is the presence of menu costs. When a   firm faces menu costs, it keeps its prices unchanged for long periods of time and   then, occasionally, shifts them to a new level when mark-up loss (or gain) is higher   than these costs. However, when the cost of changing prices is convex on the percentage   price change, retailers tend to avoid big price changes and prefer small, more   frequent ones.</p>     <p><a href="#(gra12)">Graph 12</a> shows the relationship between percentage price reductions and percentage   price increases when price changes occur. Each point in the graph corresponds to   a minimal class and the 45-degree line corresponds to the price change symmetry.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="(gra12)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04gra12.gif" /></a></p>     <p>Percentage price increases tend to be higher than percentage reductions. Absolute   percentage changes of considerable size take place in school tuition (the yearly   fee and monthly payments), college technical and other school tuition, and graduate   studies. This evidence is consistent with the long duration of price spells found for   these items under moderate inflation. The median implied duration of price spells   is 16 months for school tuition, 11.2 months for college technical and other schools tuition, and 15.9 for graduate studies.</p>     <p>Slight price change asymmetry (when the percentage increase is higher than the   percentage reduction by 5%) takes place in an array of perishable food items (tomatoes,   onions, carrots, fresh legumes and vegetables, potatoes, and other fresh fruit),   some apparel items (blouses and other women&#39;s apparel, women&#39;s sneakers, female   children&#39;s apparel, and women&#39;s pants and jeans), some education related goods (school   books and other school expenses), video devices other than TV sets, and books.</p>     <p>Moreover, percentage price increases that are higher than percentage reductions and   a higher frequency of price increases than reductions are both consistent with moderate infl ation, which is between 4% and 14% a year in our sample.</p>     <p><a href="#(gra12)">Graph 12 </a>also shows that absolute percentage price changes are higher than the average   monthly infl ation for the sample period (0.54% a month) for all the minimal   classes in the CPI. Finally, big price changes (with respect to infl ation) are common, which rules out a convex function of price changes in Colombian consumer prices.</p>     <p><b>  F. STATE AND TIME DEPENDENCY</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The shape of pricing rules in monetary policy models has a signifi cant effect on understanding   the effect of monetary policy shocks. Monetary policy models rely on   pricing rules that are broadly classifi ed as state-dependent or time-dependent. In timedependent   rules, the effect of monetary policy shocks on prices does not depend on   the state of the economy through the timing of price updates but only through the   size of the price change. In state-dependent rules, however, the probability of a price   update depends on the state of the economy; therefore, the effect of monetary shocks   on real activity and infl ation depends on the timing of price updates. Firms that follow state-dependent rules may change their prices when, for instance, the price   is suffi ciently &quot;out of line&quot; with respect to the size of menu costs thus inducing   self selection. Therefore, it is recognized that state dependency affects the speed   of the effect of monetary policy innovations. See Dias et al. (2005) and Golosov   & Lucas (2007).</p>     <p>The share of time dependency in pricing rules is usually determined through the   Klenow & Kryvtsov (2003) infl ation variance decomposition<a href="#6" name="n6"><sup>6</sup></a>.</p> . The total variation   of infl ation is split into two components; one that is commonly found in time-dependent   rules in theoretical models and the variation that is due to state dependency.     <p></p>     <p><a href="#(tab9)">Table 9</a> shows the share of state and time dependency in the Klenow-Kryvtsov infl ation   variance decomposition for each of the groups in the stickiness homogenizing classifi cation.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="(tab9)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab9.gif" /></a></p>     <p>Not surprisingly, a high share of time dependency is found in rent and services for   which periodical price updates are established by regulation just as they are for education   and health services and transportation and communications. Rent contracts   have a known duration of 12 months. Education services, because of their nature,   may change their prices every year or semester depending on the type of school. And ground transportation regulations determine the timing of price updates.</p>     <p>Services which marginal cost innovations are heavily dependent on (minimum)   wages and that are reset yearly, such as food away from home, personal services,   and services related to long term relationships with customers are also highly (70%)   time-dependent. Strong time dependency was also found in other services because   of the signifi cant weight of banking services.</p>     <p>An influential share of time dependency in the pricing rules for durable and apparel items   is also shown in <a href="#(tab9)">Table 9</a>. Time dependency in apparel items might arise because of the   seasonality of fashion collections, and time dependency in durables might arise from wage bonuses paid to Colombian workers every December as established by law.</p>     <p>Moreover, a not surprisingly high share of state dependency in the pricing rules of consumables, 56.0%, is also seen in <a href="#(tab9)">Table 9.</a></p>     <p>Substantial state dependency was found in the pricing rules of perishable food items and   high time dependency in those of semi-processed and processed food items.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Finally, the weighted mean portion of state dependency in the pricing rules of Colombian   consumer prices is 34%. <a href="#(tab10)">Table 10</a> displays a summary of the results about the pricing rules in Colombian consumer prices.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="(tab10)"><img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab10.gif" /></a></p>     <p>Based on the results from price change synchronization, Taylor contracts might be a good   approximation for items that have strongly synchronized price changes, i.e., education and health and transportation and communications, and, obviously, rent. All of these have a   combined weight of 32%. According to the Klenow-Kryvtsov inflation variance decomposition   for all items, 34% of the CPI follows a state-dependent rule, such as menu costs,   and the remaining 34% of the CPI might have a time-dependent rule, such as a Calvo rule.</p>     <p><b>G. Determinants of the Probabilit y of Price Changes , Increases , and Reductions</b></p>     <p>The shape of pricing rules can also be studied through analyses of the stochastic   structure of individual price sequences. In this section, we attempt to estimate an   aggregate model for the probability of price changes. Therefore, our results are aggregate   in nature and are simply an indication of the relative weight of state and time   dependency in aggregate pricing rules. An analysis of the shape of pricing rules at   more disaggregated levels is left for future work. However, aggregate models were   also estimated for price increases and price reductions that relate to competing hazards   in duration models.</p>     <p>The relationship between pricing rules and the probability of a price change is   straightforward for common pricing rules. In Calvo pricing, firms update their prices   at exogenously determined stochastic periods of time based on a constant unconditional   probability of price changes. In a Taylor contract for k periods of time,   the unconditional probability of a price change is zero within each price spell and   then, suddenly, jumps to one at the end of the contract. In state-dependent rules, the   unconditional probability of a price change varies with the economic environment   the firm faces within each period of time.</p>     <p>However, both this approach and duration models are sensitive to heterogeneity   when the estimation is done for more than one price sequence, i.e., when the model is aggregate. In this study, a series of factors were introduced to reduce the degree of   observed heterogeneity in the sample and thus produce reliable aggregate estimates.</p>     <p>These factors relate to the geographical location of the retailer, the type of outlet, the   main CPI group, and the group in the stickiness homogenizing classification the item   belongs to. Moreover, the year the prices were reported in was added to detect shifts in the probability of these events related to the specific year but not to other variables.</p>     <p>The economic environment the firm faces within each period of time is determined   through the GDP gap and the exchange rate devaluation of the Colombian currency   as well as through the inflation rate, the cumulative inflation since the last price update,   and the percentage difference between the price and the average market price.   All of the last three variables are measured for the minimal class in the city where the retailer is located.</p>     <p>The role of the last three variables depends on the economic model to explain price   stickiness but, in any case, they are indicators of state dependency. In menu cost models,   firms keep their prices constant until the deviation with respect to the optimal   price is smaller than the cost of changing prices. Therefore, in these models the probability   of a price change increases with inflation or cumulative inflation. In market   structure models, in which market power relates to price stickiness, the response to   the percentage difference of the price with respect to the average price of the market   depends on the market power held by the firm. The response of the firm to this variable is thus an indicator of their market power.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab11.gif" target="_blank">Table 11</a> displays the Type III analysis of variance of logistic models for price change   (left panel), price increase (center panel), and price reduction (right panel) events.   The two latter models correspond to competing risks of these events in the literature   dealing with duration models. Type III analysis of variance indicates the share of   variability of the dependent variable, which is explained by a particular factor in the   model. Therefore, the Type III analysis measures the relative importance of each factor in explaining the occurrence of each event.</p>     <p>The results shown in <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab11.gif" target="_blank">Table 11</a> reproduce the magnitude of heterogeneity in the pricesetting   rules in Colombian consumer prices found above. The stickiness homogenizing   classification, the geographic location of the retailer, the type of outlet, and   the main CPI group explain a significant part of the variability of the corresponding   event in each panel.</p>     <p>Previous results about the importance of seasonality and Taylor contracts (due to   the price regulation of services and seasonal increases in the FPC) appear in these   results as seasonality, which explains an important share of the variability in the   probability of the corresponding event in each panel. Therefore, at the most aggregate   level, time dependency in the form of Taylor contracts and other forms of time dependency, i.e., Calvo prices, emerge in the results.</p>     <p>Moreover, there is a slight portion of year-to-year variability for these probabilities   not accounted for by the economic regressors in the model. Fortunately, the share of   the variability of these probabilities due to year-to-year variation is low but statistically significant.</p>     <p>Not surprisingly, macroeconomic variables, i.e., exchange rate devaluation and real   GDP gap explain a negligibly part of the variability of the probabilities for the three   events. This result, along with the fact that price changes are high with respect to the   average monthly inflation during the sample period, seems to agree with Mackowiak & Smets (2008) in the sense that &quot;sectoral price indices respond quickly to sectorspecific shocks&quot;, and, at the same time, &quot;prices respond slowly and by small amounts to macro shocks,&quot; as state dependency of pricing rules affects the speed of response to monetary shocks.</p>     <p>There is also evidence of competing risks in the explanation of a price change. A   comparison of the ordering and variability explained by each factor between the two   panels to the right shows evidence that the relative importance of the factors relating   to price increases differs from those of a reduction. This is easily seen, for instance,   by comparing the explanatory power of the inflation of the minimal class in the city   where the retailer is located on each panel. Therefore, retailers use the information differently when deciding on a price increase or a price reduction.</p>     <p>Price increases strongly covary with inflation and the cumulative inflation since the   last price change for the minimal class in the city the retailer is located in. However,   they do not covary as strongly with the percentage difference of the price and the   average market price for each of the particular products in the city the retailer is located in.</p>     <p>Price reductions, on the other hand, are strongly heterogeneous across goods and   covary with the cumulative inflation since the last price change and the percentage   difference of the price and the average market price for each of the particular items.</p>     <p>These results point to an aggregate pricing rule that has elements of both time and   state dependency. Moreover, the evidence suggests that retailers use the information   differently when deciding on a price increase than when deciding on a price reduction, which may help explain the downward price rigidity shown above.</p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>  IV. Concluding remarks</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Our conclusions are summarized as follows:</p>     <p><i>&bull; The median implied duration of price spells in Colombian consumer prices over   the sample aggregate is 8.4 months. If the rent price of owner-occupied housing   is excluded, this duration falls to 6.4 months.</i></p>     <p>The more flexible items correspond to perishable food, utilities and transportation   combustibles; the more rigid ones are services related to long-term relationship   with customers. Similar results were found by Bils & Klenow (2004) for the US.</p>     <p>In addition, the distribution of the price spell durations shows significant weight   on items which implied duration is long. These items correspond to rent, food   away from home, apparel, ground transportation, and other expenditure items.</p>     <p>However, this result might be misleading as our dataset is not homogeneous over   time. In fact, inflation has not been on a steady path during the sample. Therefore,   the distributions of the FPC were studied for each period of time and their moments were related to inflation.</p>     <p><i>&bull; Inflation reduction in Colombia is accompanied by an increase in the duration   of price spells, a higher concentration of durations in long values, a reduction in   the variability of percentage price changes, and a reduction in downward price   rigidity in percentage changes but not in the frequency of price changes.</i></p>     <p>According to Taylor (1999), a covariation between inflation and the FPC is a   &quot;stylized fact of the price-setting behavior in a market economy,&quot; and according   to Golosov & Lucas (2007), this evidence is a major criticism of Calvo pricing   under menu costs. Thus, this result may suggest that menu costs could be present in Colombian consumer prices.</p>     <p>Moreover, as inflation falls in Colombia, so do the welfare costs of inflation   when related to inflation volatility as argued by Friedman (1977). This result   supports the choice of a small and stable inflation over the long run.   However, the duration of price spells of flexible items is invariant to inflation.   Therefore, movement and clustering, as inflation diminishes, happens for items   which prices are already sticky. A similar result was found by Bils & Klenow (2004) for the US.</p>     <p><i>&bull; When the Colombian CPI inflation reaches its long-run target of 3%, the duration   of consumer price spells will likely be between 10 and 12 months.</i></p>     <p>Taylor (1999) argues that in a market economy &quot;wage changes and price changes   have about the same average frequency-about one year,&quot; a likely result in   consumer prices when Colombia reaches its long-term inflation target. However, Taylor&#39;s claim does not seem to be true in several other countries.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>&bull; When Colombia reaches its long-run inflation target of 3%, the median of the   FPC distribution will likely be between 8.3% and 10.0% a month; its variability   (measured as the 90% central percentile rank) will likely be between 55% and   60% a month, and its skewness (measured as the difference between the mean   and median FPC) will likely be between 4% and 10% a month.</i></p>     <p>Our emphasis on the role of the first three moments of the FPC distribution arises   from theoretical results obtained by Carvalho & Schwartzman (2008), who   concluded that &quot;for empirically plausible shocks, we [Carvalho & Schwartzman]   find that the first three moments of such distribution [of the FPC] suffice to characterize   the extent of monetary non-neutrality, according to our measure.&quot; These   authors studied a staggered contract model that included price and information   stickiness heterogeneity with pricing rules specified through general hazard parameterizations.</p>     <p><i>&bull; Our findings suggest that Colombian consumer prices are less flexible than those   of Chile and Portugal.</i></p>     <p>This comparison takes into account the effect of imputed rent on the FPC and   the covariation between inflation and the FPC. Comparison to the results from   other countries is difficult as the coverage of the corresponding CPI baskets is heterogeneous in individual country studies. However, a raw comparison might   lead to the conclusion that Colombian consumer prices are more flexible than   those of the Euro Area and some European countries.</p>     <p><i>&bull; Seasonality plays a significant role in explaining the variation over time of the   price change distribution thus showing that time dependency is an influential   factor affecting the price-setting rules used by retailers.</i></p>     <p>Differing degrees of seasonality were found in the FPC of all CPI groups. Moreover,   the pricing rules for about 32% of the CPI might be approximated by Taylor contracts.</p>     <p><i>&bull; A great deal of heterogeneity in price stickiness is present across consumer   prices in Colombia.</i></p>     <p>According to Taylor (1999), another stylized fact of market economies is a great   deal of heterogeneity in price setting. Price stickiness heterogeneity seems to   have a substantial effect on the dynamic behavior of staggered contract models.   Carvalho (2006), in his celebrated Arrow Prize in Macroeconomics paper,   points to important quantitative and qualitative effects of ex-ante price setting heterogeneity on the dynamic behavior of policy models<sup><a href="#7" name="n7">7</a></sup>.</p>     <p>Based on a stickiness homogenizing classification and a comparison to previous   Colombian PPI stickiness results from Julio & Z&aacute;rate (2008), we found that the   source of goods (imports and produced and consumed items), the market structure,   and level of manufacturing theories might explain price stickiness heterogeneity in Colombian consumer goods, which are 58.7% of the CPI.</p>     <p>Price stickiness heterogeneity of services depends on regulation and the particular   features of the supply and demand of the service as well as the stickiness   of cost innovations.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>&bull; Colombian consumer prices show slight downward rigidity.</i></p>     <p>Downward nominal rigidity in the FPC relates to flexible items, and downward   nominal rigidity in percentage price changes relates to items with long price spell durations in an environment of moderate inflation.</p>     <p><i>&bull; Price reductions are common in Colombian consumer prices. Forty percent of   price changes correspond to reductions.</i></p>     <p>This is a key parameter in the calibration of menu cost models as in Golosov & Lucas (2007).</p>     <p><i>&bull; Absolute price changes are larger than monthly average inflation. Moreover,   big price changes are not uncommon.</i></p>     <p>The fact that large price changes are common might be interpreted as evidence against convex cost functions of changing prices.</p>     <p><i>&bull; Over the sample aggregate, price change synchronization in Colombian consumer   prices is low.</i></p>     <p>Not surprisingly, strong price change synchronization is found in services such   as education and health and transportation and communications. The degree of   price change synchronization is comparable to those in the individual country studies we compared our results to except for Chile.</p>     <p><i>&bull; There is evidence of both state and time dependency in the pricing rules of Colombian   retailers.</i></p>     <p>The pricing rules of 32% of the Colombian CPI might be approximated by Taylor   contracts; 34% by other types of time-dependent contracts, for example, Calvo   rules; and the remaining 34% of the CPI by state-dependent rules, which might   relate to menu costs. This last result arises from the Klenow & Kryvtsov (2003) inflation variance decomposition.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>&bull; In deciding price increases, retailers take into account different information   than when deciding price reductions.</i></p>     <p>The decision to increase prices covaries strongly with inflation and the cumulative   inflation since the last price update. The decision to reduce prices is highly   heterogeneous between different groups of goods and services and covaries with   the cumulative inflation since the last price update and the percentage difference   of the price with respect to the average price of the market. Therefore, in deciding   a price reduction Colombian retailers are more careful than when deciding   an increase. The relationship between the decision of updating prices and inflation,   and/or cumulative inflation, might suggest the existence of menu costs in a portion of the Colombian CPI.</p> </font>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>COMETARIOS</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p><sup><a href="#n1" name="1">1</a></sup> Staggered contract models, however, still raise persistence puzzles in monetary policy   analysis. To remedy the inflation persistence puzzle, for instance, Fuhrer & Moore (1995) proposed setting current price inflation based on expected inflation. Inflation indexing is a useful tool to get around the inflation persistence problem for empirical analyses but opens new puzzles with regards to the micro foundation of the procedure as noted by Taylor (1999). Because of the inflation persistence problem, DSGE models used nowadays in most central banks are not staggered contract models and, thus, include some sort of inflation indexing in their pricing rules. See, for instance, Eichembaum & Fisher (2003).</p>     <p><sup><a href="#n2" name="2">2</a></sup> Controversy over the measurement of rent prices of owner-occupied housing arises from   the fact that these are not transaction but imputed prices. In an ideal world, this price corresponds   to the mean rent price of a sample of rented housing units with &quot;similar features&quot; to the unit in   the sample that is occupied by its owner. This &quot;ideal procedure&quot; is too expensive because of the   information requirements to assure the homogeneity of each subsample over time. Current practice   in the US, for instance, is to impute the monthly growth of rent prices from a sample of rented houses   &quot;as similar as possible&quot; to the unit in the sample that is occupied by its owner. This weaker imputation   procedure is justified by the fact that the growth of rent prices tends to be homogeneous between   non-homogeneous housing units thus reducing homogenizing information requirements. This procedure   might reduce the duration of price spells in owner-occupied housing compared to the duration of   rented housing units as price changes of rented units are not synchronized. Therefore, this procedure updates the imputed prices to reflect current market conditions. See Poole et al. (2005).</p>     <p><sup><a href="#n3" name="3">3</a></sup>The surprising flexibility of consumer prices in Chile might arise from the fact that, given   Chile&#39;s history of hyperinflation, the price of many items is usually tied to &quot;Unidades de Fomento,&quot;   UF, an index that depends on past inflation. Rent prices, for instance, may change quarterly, and   wages may change twice a year. The price flexibility of rent and wages might also be transmitted to   the price flexibility of other items in the economy through costs of production factors. Price flexibility   accompanied by low inflation is also present in Brazil and Mexico, two countries that have experienced episodes of hyper inflation as well. See <a href="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a04tab6.gif" target="_blank">Table 6</a>.</p>     <p><sup><a href="#n4" name="4">4</a></sup> The seasonal adjustment is performed with the X12-method, which employs a series of   linear filters and adopts a recursive approach.</p>     <p><sup><a href="#n5" name="5">5</a></sup>Cluster analysis is a collection of algorithms; it was used in this paper to classify FPC.   The classification aims to reduce the dimensionality of the data set by making use of the similarities   among FPCs. Homogeneous groups were formed according to the Euclidian measure and the clustering algorithm based on single linkage (see Pe&ntilde;a, 2002) .</p>     <p><sup><a href="#n6" name="6">6</a></sup> According to Klenow and Krivtsov, the inflation rate might be decomposed as the product   of the FPC and the percentage price change as &pi;t = FPCt D(Pt ), where Pt is the price level and D   is the difference operator. The volatility of the first term figures prominently in many state-dependent   models, and the volatility of the second is the only source of fluctuations in time-dependent pricing models. By writing <img src="img/revistas/espe/v28n63/v28n63a03for001.gif" /> In the variance decomposition equation the first term is time-dependent and the remaining two are the state-dependent ones.</p>     <p><sup><a href="#n7" name="7">7</a></sup> Carvalho (2006) finds that &quot;monetary shocks tend to have larger and more persistent real   effects in heterogeneous economies when compared to identical-firms economies with similar degrees   of nominal and real rigidity.&quot; Therefore, introducing stickiness heterogeneity may solve the real GDP   persistence puzzle of staggered contract models. Additionally, Carvalho & Nechio (2008) show that   the introduction of stickiness heterogeneity helps explain &quot;the sluggish dynamics of real exchange rates   observed in data&quot; in a model for an open economy in comparison to a one sector staggered contract model with the same degree of stickiness. See also Aoki (2001) and Benigno (2004).</p> </font>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>REFERENCES</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <!-- ref --><p>1. Altissimo, F.; Ehrmann, M.; Smets, F. &quot;Inflation   Persistence and Price Setting Behaviour in the   Euro Area - a Summary of the IPN Evidence,   working paper, Working Paper Series, no. 46,   European Central Bank, 2006.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000224&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>2. Angeloni, I. et al. &quot;New Evidence on Inflation   Persistence and Price Stickiness in the Euro Area:   Implications for Macro Modeling&quot;, Journal of the   European Economic Association, vol. 4, no. 2-3,   Switzerland, MIT Press, pp. 562-574, 2006.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000226&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>3. Angeloni, I.; Coenen, G.; Smets, F. &quot;Persistence,   the Transmission Mechanism and Robust Monetary   Policy&quot;, Working Paper, Working Paper   Series, no. 250, European Central Bank, 2003.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000228&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>4. Aoki, K. &quot;Optimal Monetary Policy Responses   to Relative-Price Changes&quot;, Journal of Monetary   Economics, vol. 48, no. 1, USA, Elsevier,   pp. 55-80, 2001.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000230&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>5. Aucremane, L.; Dhyne, E. &quot;How Frequently Do   Prices Change? Evidence Based on the Micro   Data Underlying the Belgian CPI&quot;, Working   Paper, Working Paper Series, no. 331, European   Central Bank, 2004.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000232&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>6. Aucremane, L.; Dhyne, E. &quot;Time-Dependent versus   State-Dependent Pricing - A Panel Data Approach   to the Determinants of Belgian Consumer   Price Changes&quot;, Working Paper, Working Paper   Series, no. 462, European Central Bank, 2005.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000234&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>7. Baudry, L. et al. &quot;Price Rigidity: Evidence from   the French CPI Micro Data&quot;, Working Paper,   Working Paper Series, no. 384, European Central   Bank, 2004.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000236&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>8. Benigno, P. &quot;Optimal Monetary Policy in a Currency   Area&quot;, Journal of International Economics,   vol. 63, no. 2, USA, Elsevier, pp. 293-320, 2004.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000238&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>9. Bils, M.; Klenow, P. &quot;Some Evidence on the Importance   of Sticky Prices&quot;, Journal of Political   Economy, vol. 112, no. 5, USA, University of   Chicago Press, pp. 947-985, 2004.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000240&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>10. Blanchard, O. &quot;Price Desynchronization and   Price Level Inertia&quot;, Working Paper, NBER   Working Paper Series, no. 900, National Bureau   of Economic Research, 1982.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000242&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>11. Blanchard, O. &quot;The State of Macro&quot;, Working   Paper, NBER Working Papers, no. 14259, National   Bureau of Economic Research, 2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000244&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>12. Calvo, G. &quot;Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing   Framework&quot;, Journal of Monetary   Economics, vol. 12, no. 3, USA, Elsevier, pp.   383-398, 1983.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000246&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>13. Carvalho, C. &quot;Heterogeneity in Price Stickiness   and the Real Effects of Monetary Shocks&quot; The   B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Frontiers, vol.   2, no. 1, USA, Berkeley Electronic Press, 2006.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000248&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>14. Carvalho, C.; Nechio, F. &quot;Aggregation and the   PPP Puzzle in a Sticky Prices Model&quot;, Unpublished Mimeo, 2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000250&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>15. Carvalho, C.; Schwartzman, F. &quot;Heterogeneous   Price Setting Behavior and Aggregate Dynamics:   Some General Results&quot;, Unpublished Manuscript,   2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000252&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>16. DANE. &quot;Metodolog&iacute;a del IPC-98&quot;, Grupo de   Trabajo IPC. Bogota, Colombia, accessed (Feb.   2009) in <a href="http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/fichas/metodologia_IPC-98.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/fichas/metodologia_IPC-98.pdf</a>, 1999.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000254&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>17. Dhyne, E. et al. &quot;Price Setting in the Euro Area:   Some Stylized Facts from Individual Consumer   Price Data&quot;, Working Paper, Working Paper Series,   no. 524, European Central Bank, 2006.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000256&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>18. Dias, D.; Duarte P &quot;Stylized Features of Price   Setting Behaviour in Portugal: 1992-2001&quot;,   Working Paper, Working Paper Series, no.332,   European Central Bank, 2004.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000258&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>19. Dias, D.; Marques, C.: Santos, J. &quot;Time or State   Dependent pricing Rules? Evidence from Portuguese   Micro Data&quot;, Working Paper, Working   Paper Series, no. 511, European Central Bank, 511, 2005.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000260&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>20. Eichembaum, M.; Fisher, J. &quot;Testing the Calvo   Model of Sticky Prices&quot;, Economic Perspectives,   no. Q II, UK, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, pp. 40-53, 2003&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000262&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>21. Espinosa, A.; Jaramillo, C.; Caicedo. E. &quot;Caracterizaci&oacute;n   del ajuste microecon&oacute;mico de precios   en Colombia&quot;, Revista del Banco de la Rep&uacute;blica,   vol. 74, no. 890, Bogot&aacute;, Banco de la Rep&uacute;blica   de Colombia, pp. 65-83, 2001.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000263&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>22. Fisher, T.; Konieczni, J. &quot;Synchronization of Price   Changes by Multiproduct Firms: Evidence from   Canadian Newspaper Prices&quot;, Economic letters,   vol. 68, no. 3, USA, Elsevier, pp.271-277, 2000.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000265&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>23. Friedman, M. &quot;Nobel Lecture: Inflation and   Unemployment&quot;, Journal of Political Economy,   vol. 85, no. 3, USA, University of Chicago Press,   pp. 451-472, 1977.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000267&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>24. Fuhrer & Moore &quot;Monetary Policy Trade-Offs   and the Correlation between Nominal Interest   Rates and Real Output&quot;, The American Economic   Review, vol. 85, no. 1, USA, American Economic   Association, pp. 219-239,1995.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000269&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>25. Gagnon, E. &quot;Price Setting During Low and   High Inflation Evidence from M&eacute;xico&quot;, Mimeo,   Northwestern University, 2005.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000271&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>26. Golosov, M.; Lucas Jr. R.. &quot;Menu Costs and   Phillips Curves&quot;, Journal of Political Economy,   vol. 115, USA, University of Chicago Press, pp.   171-199, 2007.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000273&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>27. Gouvea, S. &quot;Nominal Price Rigidity in Brazil:   A Micro Evidence Approach&quot;, Mimeo, Banco   Central do Brasil, 2007.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000275&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>28. Hofstetter, M. 2008. &quot;Sticky Prices and Moderate   Inflation&quot;, Paper, Documentos CEDE, no.   005856, Bogot&aacute;, Universidad de los Andes, 2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000277&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>29. Jaramillo, C.; Cerquera, D. &quot;Price Behavior in   an Inflationary Environment: Evidence from   Supermarket Data&quot;, Borradores de Econom&iacute;a,   no. 138, Bogot&aacute;, Banco de la Rep&uacute;blica de Colombia,   1999.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000279&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>30. Julio, J.; Z&aacute;rate, H. &quot;The Price Setting Behavior   in Colombia: Evidence from PPI Micro Data&quot;,   Ensayos sobre Pol&iacute;tica Econ&oacute;mica, vol. 26, no.   56, Bogot&aacute;, Banco de la Rep&uacute;blica de Colombia,   pp. 12-44, 2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000281&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>31. Klenow, P.; Kryvtsov, O. &quot;State-dependent or   Time-Dependent Pricing: Does it Matter for Recent   US Inflation.&quot;, Manuscript, Federal Reserve   Bank of Minneapolis, 2003.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000283&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>32. Mackowiak, B.; Smets, F. &quot;On Implications of   Micro Price Data for macro Models&quot;, Working   Paper, Working Paper Series, no. 960, European   Central Bank, 2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000285&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>33. Means, G. &quot;Price Inflexibility and the Requirements   of a Stabilizing Monetary Policy&quot;, Journal   of the American Statistical Association, vol.   30, no. 190, USA, American Statistical Association,   pp. 401-413, 1935.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000287&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>34. Medina, J.; Rappoport, D.; Soto, C. &quot;Din&aacute;mica   de ajuste de los precios: evidencia de datos microecon&oacute;micos   para Chile&quot;, Econom&iacute;a Chilena,   vol. 10, no. 2, Chile, Banco Central de Chile, pp.   5-26, 2007.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000289&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>35. Misas, M.; L&oacute;pez, E.; Parra, J. &quot;La formaci&oacute;n de   precios en las empresas colombianas: evidencia   a partir de una encuesta directa&quot;, Borradores de   Econom&iacute;a, no. 569, Bogot&aacute;, Banco de la Rep&uacute;blica,   2009.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000291&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>36. Nakamura, E.; Steinsson, J. &quot;Five Facts about   Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models&quot;,   Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 123, no. 4,   USA, MIT Press, pp, 1415-1464, 2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000293&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400036&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>37. Partow, Z. 1995. &quot;Una revisi&oacute;n de la literatura   sobre los costos de la inflaci&oacute;n&quot;, Borradores   Semanales de Econom&iacute;a, 32. 1995. <a href="http://www.banrep.gov.co/docum/ftp/borra032.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.banrep.gov.co/docum/ftp/borra032.pdf</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000295&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400037&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>38. Pe&ntilde;a, D. An&aacute;lisis de datos multivariantes, Spain, McGraw Hill, 2002.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000296&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400038&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>39. Poole, R. et al. &quot;Treatment of Owner-Occupied   housing in the CPI&quot;, <a href="http://www.bls.gov" target="_blank">www.bls.gov</a>, Bureau of   Labor Statistics, accessed in <a href="http://www.bls.gov./bls/fesacp1120905.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.bls.gov./bls/fesacp1120905.pdf</a>, 2005.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000298&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400039&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>40. Rothemberg, J. &quot;Monopolistic Price Adjustment   and Aggregate Output&quot;, Review of EconomicStudies, vol. 49, no. 4, Europe, Blackwell Publishing,   pp. 517-531, 1982.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000300&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400040&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>41. Taylor, J. &quot;Staggered Price and Wage Setting in   Macroeconomics.&quot; in J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford   (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics,   New York, Elsevier, pp. 1009-1050, 1999.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000302&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400041&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>42. Taylor, J. &quot;Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered   Contracts&quot;, Journal of Political Economy, vol.   88, no. 1, USA, University of Chicago Press, pp.   1-22, 1980.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000304&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400042&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>43. Veronese G. et al. &quot;Consumer Price Behavior In   Italy: Evidence From Micro CPI Data&quot;, Working   Paper, no. 449, Working Paper Series, European   Central Bank, 2005.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000306&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400043&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>44. Walsh, C. Monetary Theory and Policy, Second Edition, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2003.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000308&pid=S0120-4483201000030000400044&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Altissimo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ehrmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smets]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Inflation Persistence and Price Setting Behaviour in the Euro Area: a Summary of the IPN Evidence]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Angeloni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[New Evidence on Inflation Persistence and Price Stickiness in the Euro Area: Implications for Macro Modeling]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the European Economic Association]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>2</numero><numero>3</numero>
<issue>2</issue><issue>3</issue>
<page-range>562-574</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[MIT Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Angeloni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coenen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smets]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Persistence, the Transmission Mechanism and Robust Monetary Policy]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aoki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Optimal Monetary Policy Responses to Relative-Price Changes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Monetary Economics]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>55-80</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aucremane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dhyne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[How Frequently Do Prices Change?: Evidence Based on the Micro Data Underlying the Belgian CPI]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aucremane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dhyne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Time-Dependent versus State-Dependent Pricing: A Panel Data Approach to the Determinants of Belgian Consumer Price Changes]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baudry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Price Rigidity: Evidence from the French CPI Micro Data]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benigno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Optimal Monetary Policy in a Currency Area]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of International Economics]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>293-320</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bils]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klenow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Political Economy]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>112</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>947-985</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blanchard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Price Desynchronization and Price Level Inertia]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Bureau of Economic Research]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blanchard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The State of Macro]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Bureau of Economic Research]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calvo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Monetary Economics]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>383-398</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carvalho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Heterogeneity in Price Stickiness and the Real Effects of Monetary Shocks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Frontiers]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Berkeley Electronic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carvalho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nechio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aggregation and the PPP Puzzle in a Sticky Prices Model]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unpublished Mimeo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carvalho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schwartzman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Heterogeneous Price Setting Behavior and Aggregate Dynamics: Some General Results]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unpublished Manuscript]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>DANE</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Metodología del IPC-98]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Grupo de Trabajo IPC]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dhyne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Price Setting in the Euro Area: Some Stylized Facts from Individual Consumer Price Data]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duarte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Stylized Features of Price Setting Behaviour in Portugal: 1992-2001]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marques]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Time or State Dependent pricing Rules?: Evidence from Portuguese Micro Data]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>511</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eichembaum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fisher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Testing the Calvo Model of Sticky Prices]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Economic Perspectives]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>Q II</numero>
<issue>Q II</issue>
<page-range>40-53</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Espinosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaramillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caicedo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Caracterización del ajuste microeconómico de precios en Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista del Banco de la República]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<numero>890</numero>
<issue>890</issue>
<page-range>65-83</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Banco de la República de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fisher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Konieczni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Synchronization of Price Changes by Multiproduct Firms: Evidence from Canadian Newspaper Prices]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Economic letters]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>271-277</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Friedman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Political Economy]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>85</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>451-472</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Fuhrer & Moore</collab>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Monetary Policy Trade-Offs and the Correlation between Nominal Interest Rates and Real Output]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The American Economic Review]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>85</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>219-239</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[American Economic Association]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gagnon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Price Setting During Low and High Inflation Evidence from México]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Northwestern University]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Golosov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lucas Jr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Menu Costs and Phillips Curves]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Political Economy]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>115</volume>
<page-range>171-199</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gouvea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nominal Price Rigidity in Brazil: A Micro Evidence Approach]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Banco Central do Brasil]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hofstetter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sticky Prices and Moderate Inflation]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de los Andes]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jaramillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cerquera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Price Behavior in an Inflationary Environment: Evidence from Supermarket Data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Borradores de Economía]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<numero>138</numero>
<issue>138</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Banco de la República de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Julio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zárate]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Price Setting Behavior in Colombia: Evidence from PPI Micro Data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ensayos sobre Política Económica]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>56</numero>
<issue>56</issue>
<page-range>12-44</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Banco de la República de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klenow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kryvtsov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[State-dependent or Time-Dependent Pricing: Does it Matter for Recent US Inflation]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mackowiak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smets]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[On Implications of Micro Price Data for macro Models]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Means]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Price Inflexibility and the Requirements of a Stabilizing Monetary Policy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the American Statistical Association]]></source>
<year>1935</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>190</numero>
<issue>190</issue>
<page-range>401-413</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[American Statistical Association]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rappoport]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Dinámica de ajuste de los precios: evidencia de datos microeconómicos para Chile]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Economía Chilena]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>5-26</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Banco Central de Chile]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Misas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La formación de precios en las empresas colombianas: evidencia a partir de una encuesta directa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Borradores de Economía]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<numero>569</numero>
<issue>569</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Banco de la República]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nakamura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steinsson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Five Facts about Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Quarterly Journal of Economics]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>123</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1415-1464</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[MIT Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Partow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Una revisión de la literatura sobre los costos de la inflación]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Borradores Semanales de Economía]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<numero>32</numero>
<issue>32</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análisis de datos multivariantes]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw Hill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poole]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Treatment of Owner: Occupied housing in the CPI]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Bureau of Labor Statistics]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rothemberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Review of EconomicStudies]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>517-531</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Blackwell Publishing]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taylor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Staggered Price and Wage Setting in Macroeconomics]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taylor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Woodford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<page-range>1009-1050</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taylor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered Contracts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Political Economy]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>88</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-22</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Veronese]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Consumer Price Behavior In Italy: Evidence From Micro CPI Data]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[European Central Bank]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Monetary Theory and Policy]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<edition>Second</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MIT Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
