<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-5307</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Investigación y Educación en Enfermería]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Invest. educ. enferm]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-5307</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-53072014000300009</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Exploring the Use of information and communication technologies and social networks among university nursing faculty staff. An opinion survey]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Explorando el uso de las Tecnologías de la información y la comunicación y las redes sociales entre el profesorado universitario de enfermería. Una encuesta de opinión]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Explorando o uso das Tecnologias da informação e a comunicação e as redes sociais entre o professorado universitário de enfermagem. Uma enquete de opinião]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández-Alemán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Belén]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López Montesinos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María José]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marqués-Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pilar]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayón Darkistade]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Enrique]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A05"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Rivera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco Javier]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A06"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Murcia -;UM-  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Murcia -;UM-  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Murcia -;UM-  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de León  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de León  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A06">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de León  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>438</fpage>
<lpage>450</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-53072014000300009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-53072014000300009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-53072014000300009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Objective. This work sought to analyze the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and social networks among the university nursing faculty staff in Spain. Methodology. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study using a questionnaire on ICT skills designed to comply with the research objective, which was evaluated by experts and which was subjected to exploratory analysis of principal components; the reliability of this instrument measured with Cronbach's alpha was 0.85. The information technology tool used to publish the questionnaire on line was Limesurvey. The sample comprised 165 professors from 25 Nursing Faculties and Schools from universities in Spain. Results. Seventy one percent of the total surveyed used internet services to look for information, 63% used the internet as a means for formation and learning, and 72% used it as a communication platform (e-mail and virtual platforms like Sakai and Moodle). Although 51% of the teaching staff surveyed had more than 120 students registered in their courses, hypothesis testing revealed that the number of students in class is not a determining factor for the teaching staff to have greater interest to update its knowledge in ICTs. Younger professors use new technologies more profusely and the most-valued advantage of using ICTs was quick access to information. Professors perceive that after the Bologna Declaration, which requires modifying their teaching-learning processes through the new teaching methodologies, a drop has been produced in their performance and that of their peers in their area of knowledge. Conclusion. The nursing teaching staff is making strong efforts to confront the new challenges posed by ICTs to train the professionals of the 21st century. It is fundamental to pay special attention to improving the university teaching staff's skills in managing ICTs, promoting the implementation of the knowledge acquired.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Objetivo. Analizar el uso de las Tecnologías de la información y la comunicación -;TIC- y las redes sociales entre el profesorado universitario de enfermería en España. Metodología. Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal en el que se empleó un cuestionario sobre competencias TIC diseñado para cumplir con el objetivo de investigación, el cual fue evaluado por expertos. Posteriormente, se le hizo análisis exploratorio de componentes principales. La confiabilidad de este instrumento fue 0.85, medida con el alfa de Cronbach. La herramienta informática utilizada para publicar en línea el cuestionario fue Limesurvey. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 165 profesores de 25 Facultades y Escuelas de Enfermería de las Universidades de España. Resultados. El 71% del total de encuestados utilizaba los servicios de Internet para buscar información, el 63% hacía uso de Internet como vía de formación y aprendizaje y un 72% lo empleaba como plataforma de comunicación (correo electrónico y plataformas virtuales como Sakai y Moodle). A pesar de que el 51% del profesorado encuestado tenía más de 120 alumnos matriculados en sus cursos, un contraste de hipótesis reveló que el número de alumnos en clase no es un factor determinante para que el profesorado tenga mayor interés por actualizar sus conocimientos en TIC. Los profesores más jóvenes utilizan con mayor profusión las nuevas tecnologías y la ventaja más valorada del uso de las TIC fue el acceso rápido a la información. Los profesores perciben que tras la Declaración de Bolonia, que exige modificar sus procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante las nuevas metodologías docentes, se ha producido un descenso en el rendimiento propio y en el de sus compañeros de área de conocimiento. Conclusión. El profesorado de enfermería está afrontando con esfuerzo los nuevos retos que las TIC plantean para formar a los profesionales del siglo XXI. Es fundamental prestar especial atención al mejoramiento de las competencias en manejo de TIC del profesorado universitario, impulsando la puesta en práctica de los conocimientos adquiridos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Objetivo. Analisar o uso das Tecnologias da informação e a comunicação -;TICs- e as redes sociais entre o professorado universitário de enfermagem na Espanha. Metodologia. Estudo descritivo de corte transversal no que se empregou um questionário sobre concorrências TICs desenhado para cumprir com o objetivo de investigação, o qual foi avaliado por experientes e ao que posteriormente se lhe fez análise exploratório de componentes principais; a confiabilidade deste instrumento medida com o alfa de Cronbach foi 0.85. A ferramenta informática utilizada para publicar na linha o questionário foi Limesurvey. A amostra esteve composta por 165 professores de 25 Faculdades e Escolas de Enfermagem das Universidades da Espanha. Resultados. 71% do total de interrogados utilizava os serviços de Internet para procurar informação, 63% fazia uso de internet como via de formação e aprendizagem e um 72% o empregava como plataforma de comunicação (correio eletrônico e plataformas virtuais como Sakai e Moodle). Apesar de que 51% do professorado interrogado tinha mais de 120 alunos matriculados em seus cursos, um contraste de hipótese revelou que o número de alunos em classe não é um fator determinante para que o professorado tenha maior interesse por atualizar seus conhecimentos em TICs. Os professores mais jovens utilizam com maior profusão as novas tecnologias e a vantagem mais valorizada do uso das TICs foi o acesso rápido à informação. Os professores percebem que depois da Declaração de Bologna, que exige modificar seus processos de ensino-aprendizagem mediante as novas metodologias docentes, produziu-se um descenso no rendimento próprio e no de seus colegas da área de conhecimento. Conclusão. O professorado de enfermagem está enfrentado com esforço os novos reptos que as TICs propõem para formar aos profissionais do século XXI. É fundamental prestar especial atendimento ao melhoramento as concorrências em manejo de TICs do professorado universitário, impulsionando a posta em prática dos conhecimentos adquiridos.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[education, nursing]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[educational technology]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[nursing research]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[educación en enfermería]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tecnología educacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[investigación en enfermería]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[educação em enfermagem]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[tecnologia educacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[pesquisa em enfermagem]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font size="2" face="Verdana">      <p align="right"> <b>ART&Iacute;CULO ORIGINAL / ORIGINAL ARTICLE/ ARTIGO ORIGINAL</b></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="center"><font size="4" face="Verdana"><b>Exploring the Use of information and communication technologies and social networks among university nursing faculty staff. An opinion survey</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Explorando el uso de las Tecnolog&iacute;as de la informaci&oacute;n y la comunicaci&oacute;n y las redes sociales entre el profesorado universitario de enfermer&iacute;a. Una encuesta de opini&oacute;n</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>Explorando o uso das Tecnologias da informa&ccedil;&atilde;o e a comunica&ccedil;&atilde;o e as redes sociais entre o professorado universit&aacute;rio de enfermagem. Uma enquete de opini&atilde;o</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> <b>Jos&eacute; Luis Fern&aacute;ndez-Alem&aacute;n<sup>1</sup>; Ana Bel&eacute;n S&aacute;nchez Garc&iacute;a<sup>2</sup>; Mar&iacute;a Jos&eacute; L&oacute;pez Montesinos<sup>3</sup>; Pilar Marqu&eacute;s-S&aacute;nchez<sup>4</sup>; Enrique Bay&oacute;n Darkistade<sup>5</sup>; Francisco Javier P&eacute;rez Rivera<sup>6</sup></b></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>       <p> <sup>1</sup>Computer Science Engineer, Ph.D. Professor, Universidad de Murcia -;UM-, Spain. email: <a href="mailto:aleman@um.es" target="_blank">aleman@um.es</a>.</p>     <p> <sup>2</sup>RN, Master. Professor, UM, Spain. email: <a href="mailto:absanchezg@gmail.com" target="_blank">absanchezg@gmail.com</a>.</p>     <p> <sup>3</sup>RN, Ph.D. Professor, UM, Spain. email: <a href="mailto:mjlopez@um.es" target="_blank">mjlopez@um.es</a>.</p>     <p> <sup>4</sup>RN, Ph.D. Professor, Universidad de Le&oacute;n, Spain. email: <a href="mailto:pilar.marques@unileon.es" target="_blank">pilar.marques@unileon.es</a>.</p>     <p> <sup>5</sup>Biologist, PH.D. Professor, Universidad de Le&oacute;n, Spain. email: <a href="mailto:jebayd@unileon.es" target="_blank">jebayd@unileon.es</a>.</p>     <p> <sup>6</sup>RN, Ph.D. Professor, Universidad de Le&oacute;n, Spain. email: <a href="mailto:javier.perez.rivera@unileon.es" target="_blank">javier.perez.rivera@unileon.es</a>.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p> <b>Receipt date: </b>February 5, 2014. <b>Approval date: </b>June 3 2014.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p> <b>Article linked to research: </b>Explorando el uso de las Tecnolog&iacute;as de la informaci&oacute;n y la comunicaci&oacute;n y las redes sociales entre el profesorado universitario de enfermer&iacute;a: una encuesta de opini&oacute;n.</p>     <p> <b>Subventions: </b>none.</p>     <p> <b>Conflicts of interest: </b>none.</p>     <p> <b>How to cite this article: </b> Fern&aacute;ndez-Alem&aacute;n JL, S&aacute;nchez AB, L&oacute;pezMJ, Marqu&eacute;s-S&aacute;nchez P, Bay&oacute;nE, P&eacute;rez FJ. Exploring the Use of information and communication technologies and social networks among university nursing faculty staff. An opinion survey.  Invest Educ Enferm. 2014; 32(3): 438-450.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr noshade>     <p> <b>ABSTRACT</b> </p>     <p><i>Objective</i>. This work sought to analyze the use of Information  and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and social networks among the university nursing faculty staff in  Spain. <i>Methodology</i>. This was a descriptive,  cross-sectional study using a questionnaire on ICT skills designed to comply  with the research objective, which was evaluated by experts and which was  subjected to exploratory analysis of principal components; the reliability of  this instrument measured with Cronbach's alpha was 0.85. The information  technology tool used to publish the questionnaire on line was Limesurvey. The  sample comprised 165 professors from 25 Nursing Faculties and Schools from universities  in Spain. <i>Results</i>. Seventy one  percent of the total surveyed used internet services to look for information,  63% used the internet as a means for formation and learning, and 72% used it as  a communication platform (e-mail and virtual platforms like Sakai and Moodle).  Although 51% of the teaching staff surveyed had more than 120 students registered  in their courses, hypothesis testing revealed that the number of students in  class is not a determining factor for the teaching staff to have greater interest  to update its knowledge in ICTs. Younger professors use new technologies more  profusely and the most-valued advantage of using ICTs was quick access to information.  Professors perceive that after the Bologna Declaration, which requires modifying  their teaching-learning processes through the new teaching methodologies, a  drop has been produced in their performance and that of their peers in their  area of knowledge. <i>Conclusion</i>. The  nursing teaching staff is making strong efforts to confront the new challenges  posed by ICTs to train the professionals of the 21<sup>st</sup> century. It is fundamental  to pay special attention to improving the university teaching staff's skills in  managing ICTs, promoting the implementation of the knowledge acquired.</p>     <p> <b>Key words: </b>education, nursing;  educational technology; nursing research.</p>  <hr noshade>     <p> <b>RESUMEN</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>Objetivo</i>.  Analizar el uso de las Tecnolog&iacute;as de la informaci&oacute;n y la comunicaci&oacute;n <i>-;</i>TIC- y las  redes sociales entre el profesorado universitario de enfermer&iacute;a en Espa&ntilde;a. <i>Metodolog&iacute;a</i>. Estudio descriptivo de  corte transversal en el que se emple&oacute; un cuestionario sobre competencias TIC  dise&ntilde;ado para cumplir con el objetivo de investigaci&oacute;n, el cual fue evaluado  por expertos. Posteriormente, se le hizo an&aacute;lisis exploratorio de componentes  principales. La confiabilidad de este instrumento fue 0.85, medida con el alfa  de Cronbach. La herramienta inform&aacute;tica utilizada para publicar en l&iacute;nea el cuestionario  fue Limesurvey. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 165 profesores de 25 Facultades  y Escuelas de Enfermer&iacute;a de las Universidades de Espa&ntilde;a. <i>Resultados</i>. El 71% del total de encuestados utilizaba los servicios  de Internet para buscar informaci&oacute;n, el 63% hac&iacute;a uso de Internet como v&iacute;a de  formaci&oacute;n y aprendizaje y un 72% lo empleaba como plataforma de comunicaci&oacute;n  (correo electr&oacute;nico y plataformas virtuales como Sakai y Moodle). A pesar de  que el 51% del profesorado encuestado ten&iacute;a m&aacute;s de 120 alumnos matriculados en  sus cursos, un contraste de hip&oacute;tesis revel&oacute; que el n&uacute;mero de alumnos en clase  no es un factor determinante para que el profesorado tenga mayor inter&eacute;s por  actualizar sus conocimientos en TIC. Los profesores m&aacute;s j&oacute;venes utilizan con  mayor profusi&oacute;n las nuevas tecnolog&iacute;as y la ventaja m&aacute;s valorada del uso de las  TIC fue el acceso r&aacute;pido a la informaci&oacute;n. Los profesores perciben que tras la  Declaraci&oacute;n de Bolonia, que exige modificar sus procesos de  ense&ntilde;anza-aprendizaje mediante las nuevas metodolog&iacute;as docentes, se ha  producido un descenso en el rendimiento propio y en el de sus compa&ntilde;eros de  &aacute;rea de conocimiento. <i>Conclusi&oacute;n</i>. El  profesorado de enfermer&iacute;a est&aacute; afrontando con esfuerzo los nuevos retos que las  TIC plantean para formar a los profesionales del siglo XXI. Es fundamental  prestar especial atenci&oacute;n al mejoramiento de las competencias en manejo de TIC  del profesorado universitario, impulsando la puesta en pr&aacute;ctica de los  conocimientos adquiridos.</p>     <p><i>Palabras clave: </i>educaci&oacute;n en enfermer&iacute;a; tecnolog&iacute;a educacional;  investigaci&oacute;n en enfermer&iacute;a.</p>  <hr noshade>     <p> <b>RESUMO</b> </p>     <p><i>Objetivo</i>. Analisar o uso das Tecnologias da informa&ccedil;&atilde;o e  a comunica&ccedil;&atilde;o -;TICs- e as redes sociais entre o professorado universit&aacute;rio de  enfermagem na Espanha. <i>Metodologia</i>.  Estudo descritivo de corte transversal no que se empregou um question&aacute;rio sobre  concorr&ecirc;ncias TICs desenhado para cumprir com o objetivo de investiga&ccedil;&atilde;o, o  qual foi avaliado por experientes e ao que posteriormente se lhe fez an&aacute;lise  explorat&oacute;rio de componentes principais; a confiabilidade deste instrumento  medida com o alfa de Cronbach foi 0.85. A ferramenta inform&aacute;tica utilizada para  publicar na linha o question&aacute;rio foi Limesurvey. A amostra esteve composta por  165 professores de 25 Faculdades e Escolas de Enfermagem das Universidades da  Espanha. <i>Resultados</i>.&nbsp; 71% do total de interrogados utilizava os  servi&ccedil;os de Internet para procurar informa&ccedil;&atilde;o, 63% fazia uso de internet como  via de forma&ccedil;&atilde;o e aprendizagem e um 72% o empregava como plataforma de  comunica&ccedil;&atilde;o (correio eletr&ocirc;nico e plataformas virtuais como Sakai e Moodle).  Apesar de que 51% do professorado interrogado tinha mais de 120 alunos  matriculados em seus cursos, um contraste de hip&oacute;tese revelou que o n&uacute;mero de  alunos em classe n&atilde;o &eacute; um fator determinante para que o professorado tenha  maior interesse por atualizar seus conhecimentos em TICs. Os professores mais  jovens utilizam com maior profus&atilde;o as novas tecnologias e a vantagem mais  valorizada do uso das TICs foi o acesso r&aacute;pido &agrave; informa&ccedil;&atilde;o. Os professores  percebem que depois da Declara&ccedil;&atilde;o de Bologna, que exige modificar seus  processos de ensino-aprendizagem mediante as novas metodologias docentes,  produziu-se um descenso no rendimento pr&oacute;prio e no de seus colegas da &aacute;rea de  conhecimento. <i>Conclus&atilde;o</i>. O  professorado de enfermagem est&aacute; enfrentado com esfor&ccedil;o os novos reptos que as  TICs prop&otilde;em para formar aos profissionais do s&eacute;culo XXI. &Eacute; fundamental prestar  especial atendimento ao melhoramento as concorr&ecirc;ncias em manejo de TICs do  professorado universit&aacute;rio, impulsionando a posta em pr&aacute;tica dos conhecimentos  adquiridos. </p>     <p><i>Palavras  chave</i>: educa&ccedil;&atilde;o em enfermagem; tecnologia educacional;  pesquisa em enfermagem.</p>  <hr noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>INTRODUCTION</b> </font></p>     <p>Information and  Communication Technologies (ICTs) are emerging in new study plans of the  nursing career in recent years, which is marked by the implementation of the  European Space for Higher Education and legal reforms in countries incorporated  to the Bologna Process and the Prague Communiqu&eacute;. The objectives of the Bologna  Declaration, signed on 19 June 1999, include harmonizing the European higher  education systems and setting the bases for convergence among member states in  terms of academic recognition, with a system based on two cycles.<sup>1</sup> It also sought to establish a common  European Credit Transfer System and promote European cooperation to ensure a  level of quality in developing comparable criteria and methodologies, which  would facilitate continuous formation of students throughout their lives.  Within this setting, both professors and learners must modify their  teaching-learning processes through new teaching methodologies. The ICTs play a  very important role in the new educational resources as didactic resources in  university careers in general, and of nursing in particular,<sup>2,3</sup> as objects of study, as elements for  communication and expression, as instruments for educational organization,  management, and administration, and/or as instruments for research. </p>     <p>Information and  communication technology skills are understood as the capacity to know and  understand, and know how to apply in practice this knowledge of ICT use in  their diverse functions and application contexts.<sup>4</sup> Command of ICT is essential for the teaching profession.<sup>5</sup> Teachers must be able to design,  develop, and evaluate learning experiences based on new technologies. A clear example  of this revolution is the increased use of on-line teaching applications,<sup>6</sup> mobile devices in class,<sup>7</sup> and Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCS)  given at the most prestigious universities in the world like Stanford, Harvard,  and Berkeley.<sup>8</sup> Use of ICTs is  also broadly recognized by other international organisms. The World Health  Organization identified its use as a crucial skill to accomplish optimal  development of human health resources, improve health systems, and as  instruments to reach the Millennium's Development Objectives.<sup>9</sup> This new scenario implies an adaptation  effort by nursing teaching staff. Professors are asked for new skills in  advanced command of ICTs,<sup>10</sup> as  well as systems of continuous network formation that help them keep abreast of  knowledge.<sup>11</sup> The new teaching methodologies and technologies  will share leading roles with the master class, actively implicating students  in their own learning, educating and training future health professionals in  skills of critical and reflexive thought reinforced on selflearning.<sup>12&nbsp; </sup>Within  this context, the aim proposed in this work was to analyze the perception of  university nursing professors on the use of ICTs as didactic resources in  achieving the objectives of the Bologna Declaration. For this, information has  been gathered by e-mailing a questionnaire to a random sample of professors  from Nursing Faculties and Schools of Spanish public and privately run  universities.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>METHODOLOGY</b> </font></p>     <p>This work sought to study  the perception university nursing professors have on the use of ICTs as  teaching resources. The specific objectives were: (1) identify what  technologies are employed and for what purpose; (2) learn what formation the  university nursing professors have acquired on ICTs; (3) inquire on what types  of cooperation networks the professional professors create to share their  knowledge to improve the quality of teaching and research. Two methods were  employed to develop the objectives proposed in this research: literature review  and empirical study. Hence, the research was conducted in two phases:</p>     <p>1- Search and analysis of  bibliographic background, as well as national and international questionnaires  used to measure opinions on the use of ICTs by university nursing faculty  staff. A review was made from 2003 to August 2012. Other relevant documents  were also identified from the authors' expert knowledge.</p>     <p>2- Design, validation, and  application of an evaluation instrument based on a questionnaire available for  university nursing faculty staff. On-line activation was conducted of the  questionnaire to evaluate ICT skills of Spanish university nursing professors.</p>     <p><i>Sample. </i>An  exhaustive list was created through the web page of the Spanish Ministry of  Education, from which were selected public and privately run Nursing Faculties.  Additionally, the different secretaries from the Centers were contacted as an  initial entry point and link prior to contacting the teaching staff. With this  intention, they were sent a presentation letter explaining the motivation of  the research. The inclusion criteria in selecting the sample was the active  full or part-time teaching staff, including clinical and academic associate  teaching staff, without excluding those who were currently on sick leave,  vacation, or sabbatical year. The study population was composed by 434  university professors who carry out their professional work in Nursing  Faculties of Spanish higher education institutions. An e-mail was sent to all  the professors selected, explaining the objective of the research and inviting  them to participate. After six weeks in which the questionnaire remained  available on the web (from 01 March to 15 April 2013), a total of 165 (38.01%)  questionnaires were completed.</p>     <p><i>Literature review. </i>Several similar relevant publications exist for this  work. A study using a 34-question questionnaire showed that university  professors from Universidad de Las Palmas in Gran Canaria maintained a positive  attitude regarding the use of ICTs in their daily practice.<sup>13</sup> A total of 30 university professors  also responded positively to a questionnaire on their perception to on-line  learning in a university center in Taiwan.<sup>14</sup> In a Dutch university, 178 university professors completed a questionnaire to  identify the factors that explain the use of on-line learning environments. The  perception of the added value of these environments was obtained as predictor.<sup>15</sup> In another study conducted in the  University of South Carolina,  a total of 197 participants responded to a questionnaire on the perception of  the needs professors have to use ICTs.<sup>16</sup> It was concluded that greater technical assistance would be required to  maximize the adoption of the new technologies employed in class and on line  (principally in-class response devices and electronic boards). Also, great  formation demand was found in databases and software to design web pages and  capture images and audio. More specifically in the health field, numerous  studies exist based on questionnaires that investigate different factors on the  use of ICTs among university teaching staff. By applying Pierre Bourdieu's  practice theory, internal factors were identified (knowledge of information  technology, perceived utility), as well as external factors (lack of time,  limited infrastructure) that influence on the adoption of ICTs among the  university teaching staff from a university in the United Kingdom.<sup>17</sup> The aim of a study through  questionnaire conducted in the United Kingdom was to determine the opinion of  102 university instructors with respect to the use of on-line teaching.  Although most of the participants recognized the benefits of the new  technologies in teaching, scarce resources, time and technical support were the  main obstacles found.<sup>18</sup> A  study conducted through an on-line questionnaire with 193 university professors  from the United States revealed that more than half of those surveyed were  frequent users of distance learning and of information technology tools.<sup>19</sup> Approximately 66% of those surveyed  indicated they were competent regarding ICTs, although 69% recognized the need  for more formation. The availability of technical, financial, and formative  support was statistically associated with the use of distance learning  technologies. An on-line questionnaire to directors and deans of 266 nursing  programs in faculties of the United States also confirmed the idea that the  university nursing professors had a basic level of knowledge in nursing  informatics.<sup>20</sup> A questionnaire  to 171 university nursing professors recognizes the greater load in terms of  time that supposes preparing material for web courses against classroom  courses.<sup>21</sup> Another study  discovered that the motivation of the academic personnel is the most important  factor to participate in distance learning.<sup>22</sup></p>     <p><i>Instruments.</i> The members of the research team elaborated a list of  factors to evaluate from their personal experiences, complemented with some  dimensions gathered from another questionnaire on the use of ICT among  university teaching staff.<sup>13</sup> A  literature review was carried out in the national and international setting,  which analyzed and critically evaluated the questionnaires found.<sup>17-26</sup>. The CUIDEN, SciELO,  ScienceDirect, and PubMed databases were consulted, as well as other on-line  bibliography sources,<sup>27,28</sup> on  the use of questionnaires as research technique used in our object of study.  After an adaptation, harmonization, and extension process of all the  questionnaires so they would be most useful in gathering information, a list of  42 items was obtained. Specifically, during this phase issues related to the  virtual platforms used by professors were combined and enhanced. Some  questionnaires considered few tools, among them the teaching board, which turns  out poor in the data analysis of our study. Other questionnaires introduced  questions that resulted too long or included technical aspects that require  advanced informatics knowledge, which is why they were omitted. Additionally,  issues related with professor categories in most of the questionnaires analyzed  did not gather all the figures of the current Spanish university system. The  questionnaire was subjected to the Delphi consensus technique among nine  experts, which included active-service nurses, university nursing professors,  and university informatics professors with experience in innovation teaching  projects. As a result of this process, in the analysis of the demographic data,  the decision was adopted to consider the area of knowledge and not the name of  the assignment taught. Although the name of the assignment is more specific, it  is not as determining as the area of knowledge to learn of the professor's  formation. Also, adding a third section was proposed: social networks,<sup>29,30</sup> to analyze how different  professional professors transfer information and help, creating cooperation  networks that impact upon a higher quality of teaching. Currently, confusion  exists with the concept of networks, given that ''networks'' are mainly related  to digital connections like Facebook and not to interpersonal links. From here  on, we will refer to the term network as structure of connections among  physical individuals and not among virtual connections or links.</p>     <p>After this first review,  the questionnaire was reduced to 34 items and it was again sent to the experts  who after a new Delphi round achieved a 25-item questionnaire. To determine the  content validity, the resulting questionnaire was sent to another panel of  three experts (different from the previous), comprising nursing and informatics  researchers related with teaching in ICT. After receiving suggestions in  drafting two questions and some observations, the final 24-item questionnaire  was obtained. The questionnaire drawn up has three sections: (1) demographic  data; (2) personal opinion issues proposed on the use of ICTs; and (3) analysis  of social networks. A five point Likert-type scale was used in which 1 means  ''Disagree totally'' and 5 means ''Agree totally''. The information technology tool  used to publish the questionnaire on line was Limesurvey. For statistical  treatment of the data, the SPSS (version 19) statistical package was used.</p>     <p><i>Instrument validation.</i> Once the first complete version of the  questionnaire was designed, a pilot test was carried out in on-line version and  self-administered, and the evaluation of the metric properties of the scale.<sup>28</sup> The pilot or pretest was given to 35  individuals similar to those in the sample, but who would not participate in  the study, and, thus, avoid possible bias of expectations. Additionally, the  participants were invited to evaluate comprehension and length of the questions  formulated through informal interviews. It was tested if the statement was  correct, with a logical internal order and adequate categorization of  responses. Besides, no psychological resistance or rejection to any question  was identified, and its duration was acceptable for those surveyed. Subsequently,  an analysis and evaluation of the metric properties of the pretest was carried  out to make sure the measurement instrument was reliable and valid. To evaluate  the internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha value was calculated for the  questionnaire, obtaining a value of 0.85. The item-total correlation values  ranged between 0.52 and 0.73. Acceptable temporal stability (test-retest  reliability) was obtained between its on-line application and its  self-administered application (ICC = 0.81). For the validity of the construct,  the exploratory factor analysis through the principal components method with  varimax rotation was calculated, with a measure of sampling adequacy KMO =  0.832. Bartlett's test of sphericity showed significant approximation (p &lt;  0.001).</p>     <p><i>Statistical analysis.</i> Descriptive statistics was performed,  presenting frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables, as well as  standard means and deviations for the quantitative variables. In hypothesis  testing, for quantitative dependent variables, Student's t test was applied to  compare the means of two groups, and the ANOVA of one factor to compare those  of more than two groups. To apply these parametric tests, we tested the  normality of a sample distribution through the Kolmogorov-Smirnova test and the  equality of variance through the Levene test. For dichotomy qualitative  dependent variables we used binary logistic regression, applying Wald's test  and calculating the odds ratio. To analyze questionnaire validity, we employed  the technique of exploratory factor analysis of principal components, followed  by Varimax rotation for construct validity. The adequacy of factorial analysis  was evaluated through the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test and Bartlett's test for  sphericity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to evaluate internal  consistency and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to measure  test-retest reliability. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>RESULTS</b> </font></p>     <p><i>Descriptive statistics</i>. A total of 165 complete questionnaires were received  from 25 Nursing Faculties and Schools throughout Spain. <a href="#t1">Table 1</a> illustrates the  general characteristics of the sample, which can be summarized in that females  predominated (63.63%), age was &gt;44 years (50.92%,), area of knowledge is  health (77.57%), one in every five is a University School full professor, three  in every five have more than six years of seniority in the university, teaching  specially in the first three years of the undergraduate program, and one in every  two professors had over 120 registered students assigned to them. </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t1"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/iee/v32n3/en_v32n3a09t01.PNG"></p>     <p><a href="#t2">Table 2</a> highlights lap-top computers as the most-used device during an academic  course (73.33%). Most professors (60.61%) prolonged their work shift outside  the university facilities, using telematic networks to connect with their  university's ICT systems. A total of 71.52% used internet services to search  for information, 63.64% used the internet for formation and learning, and  72.73% as communication platform (email and virtual platforms like Sakai and  Moodle). </p>     <p>Students received training  in ICT. When they were asked for their opinion on the level of command they had  of ICT, 15.15% reported that it was basic, 43.64% stated that it was a medium  level, 15.15% felt it was high, and 1.82% reported not using them. A total of  24.24% of the students did not answer these two questions.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t2"></a> <img src="/img/revistas/iee/v32n3/en_v32n3a09t02.PNG" target="_blank"></p>     <p>Regarding  the search for information related to research and teaching through people  outside the university, those surveyed were asked to  establish an order on 14 possible advantages and nine possible inconveniences  of using ICT by the teaching staff (<a href="#t3">Table 3</a> ), assigning a score from 14 to 1, and from 9 to  1, respectively, in order of election. Quick access to information (M=10.31)  and open and flexible formation processes (M=9.73) were the most valued  benefits. On the contrary, professors do not perceive that the application of  ICT allows them to have more time for other tasks (M=2.58). Among the most  notable inconveniences of using ICT, dispersion (M=6) and need for continuous  formation (M=5.83) were found.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a name="t3"> </a> <img src="/img/revistas/iee/v32n3/en_v32n3a09t03.PNG" ></p>     <p><i>Relationship between demographic variables and opinion  variables. </i>By using Pearson's  correlation coefficient, we obtained a negative correlation of -0.12 between  age and the number of devices (lap-top computer, tablet, etc.) used in the  teaching practice. These results indicate that younger professors use more  profusely the new technologies. Significant differences were not found between  a periodic formation and their perception on their teaching capacity and  command of ICT (p=0.679). Significant differences were also not found between  the number of students a professor teaches and connecting through telematic  networks from outside the work center to the university's ICT systems, or between  teaching classes in the first, second, third, fourth, masters', PhD courses, on  the degree of implication of the teaching staff in their formation in ICT.</p>     <p>The Chi square test found significant differences  among teaching at the masters' (p=0.05), PhD (p=0.28) levels and teaching  capacity in the command of ICT. Specifically, professors who teach in the  masters' level have 2.56 times more probability of having a high command and  capacity to manage ICT. For professors who teach in the PhD level, this value increases  to 4.57 times. Instead, no significant differences were obtained among: (1)  number of students in class with respect to interest to update their knowledge  in ICT, (2) teaching category and receiving formation in ICT, (3) teaching  category and teaching capacity to manage ICT.</p>     <p><i>Social networks. </i>Another multiple choice question was formulated to  know who used social networks outside or inside their university. Tables <a href="#t4">4</a>  and 5  show the mean scores assigned by those surveyed in  relation to the university figures and preferred external contacts to search  for information related to research and teaching. </p>     <p><i>Table 4.</i> Search for information related to research and  teaching through work peers and contacts outside the university</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t4"> </a> <img src="/img/revistas/iee/v32n3/en_v32n3a09t04.PNG" ></p>     <p>Hypothesis testing was  conducted (paired Student's t test) between the professional categories and  external contacts with higher and lower mean, both for teaching and for  research. Statistically significant results were obtained between University  School Full Professors and aides, t(124) = 4.032 (p &lt;0.001), and between  peers from other universities and syndicates, t(119) = 12.237 (p &lt;0.001) for  research, and between University School Full Professors and University  Professors, t(121) = 7.475 (p &lt;0.001), and between peers from other  universities and syndicates t(117) = 13.583 (p &lt;0.001) for teaching. The  last question on the questionnaire and in the social networks section inquired  if the Bologna Declaration had impacted upon the professors' performance. The results  show that, after the Bologna Declaration, the professors perceived that a drop  had been produced in their personal performance (from M=3.94 to M=3.79) and  within their area of knowledge (from M=3.88 to M=3.72) with respect to their  ICT skills. Hypothesis testing showed that these differences were significant  in personal performance t(116)=2.14 (p=0.034) and in the performance of the  peers in the area of knowledge t(116)=2.01 (p=0.046).</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>DISCUSSION</b> </font></p>     <p>The majority of the  teaching staff surveyed (88.49%) is over 33 years of age, which can have a  negative impact on the predisposition to learning the new technologies.<sup>31</sup> Habitually, activities linked to ICT  and teaching have not had well-defined funding, management, and development  channels in Spanish universities. On the contrary, these activities have been  developed by enthusiastic professors, who have managed to autonomously acquire  the necessary resources to implement them.<sup>32</sup> More than half of the teaching staff has been on the job between 6 and 25  years, probably due to the creation of numerous Nursing Schools during the  period of expansion of universities in Spain.<sup>33</sup> The percentage of professors with less than five years on  the job is also high (26%), justified by the creation of the four-year Nursing  degree, which added one more course to the former Diploma course in Nursing and  that has required new recruitment. Also noted were a good number of areas of  knowledge represented in the sample, reflecting a high degree of  multi-disciplinary assignments belonging to nursing careers in Spain.<sup>34</sup></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Given the recent creation  of PhD programs in nursing, there is scarce presence of teaching staff of the  University Full Professor category, as well as PhD thesis advisors. Employing  the TESEO information source,<sup>35</sup> the first nursing thesis in Spain dates to 1983. Since then, and until 2007,  there is an average of 12 theses per year. However, since 2008 this average has  increased, reaching 18 during the 2012/13 academic course.</p>     <p>There is a high percentage  of nursing faculty staff who teaches in the initial courses, where the  classrooms tend to be overcrowded. A certain predisposition could be expected  of nursing professors to use ICT, given that the results reveal that 80.59% of  the university nursing faculty staff surveyed has over 60 students assigned to  them. Although numerous studies show the importance of ICTs as educational  resource in overcrowded classes,<sup>6</sup> hypothesis testing revealed that the number of students in class is not a  determining factor for the university nursing faculty staff in Spain to have  greater interest to update their knowledge in ICT. A possible cause may be found  in the scant recognition of the merits for teaching innovation in accreditation  processes of the teaching staff in Spain, and it is perceived that they will be  absolutely marginalized during the following university reform legislation.<sup>36</sup></p>     <p>Our results confirm prior  studies that identify the use and application of the internet as one of the  tools par excellence of the university teaching staff. Although most nursing  professors use a lap-top computer, undoubtedly, it seems that the use of  wireless devices emerges strongly, especially cell phones and tablets, as  confirmed by previous studies.<sup>7</sup> Another important bastion in university teaching are the institutional support  services for teaching implementation of ICT. Most Spanish universities have  adopted learning management systems like Moodle or Sakai, although until  recently, their use had still not extended among the university teaching staff.<sup>26 </sup>The data obtained offer evidence that  the university nursing faculty staff access digital resources to enhance their  teaching work, as well as select and use adequate tools and ICT resources for  student learning. In spite of their extraordinary predisposition (66.67% of the  university nursing professors received ICT formation), the majority (43.64%)  considers having a medium level in managing ICT and only 15.15% recognize  having a high level of command of skills related with ICT, in line with other  works that confirm the difficulty of their learning.<sup>19,37</sup> This can be the cause why professors do not perceive  that the application of ICT lets them have more time to develop their teaching  and research tasks. For communication through ICT, scarcity of its adoption was  also observed by professors over 40 years of age, against the younger  professors who are from a generation of digital natives.</p>     <p>In the section studying  communication networks, we can observe that University Professor (M=1.75) and  University Full Professor (M=2.33) are not consulted more than the rest in the  research setting, as would be expected. On the contrary, data show that  University School Full Professor is the most-consulted figure in teaching  (M=2.86) and in research (M=2.81), probably because they are a majority group.  With the expansion of Nursing in universities in Spain and the irruption of PhD  programs in Nursing, this predisposition should change.<sup>38 </sup>It is observed that the perception  university professors have of their ICT skills has diminished after the Bologna  Declaration. Given that it is a study centered on testing the degree of ICT use  by the university teaching staff in four Spanish universities (Universities of  Cantabria, Oviedo, Ja&eacute;n, and Le&oacute;n), we confirm the need for teaching  methodological formation, and the use of didactic tools by using ICT, according  to the suggestions established by Bologna.<sup>26</sup> We found it fundamental to pay special attention to  the initial and permanent formation of the university teaching staff, promoting  the figure of mentor in the implementation of the formation received when  professors confront the preparation of their assignments with diverse ICT  resources. Undoubtedly, access to prior experiences of good practices in the  use of ICT will help to achieve the level of excellence required.</p>     <p><i>Limitations of the study</i>. The procedures used in this work to elaborate the  research instrument and collect the data can present some limitations. Although  the search for the opinion questionnaires to draft the final questionnaire has  been done by following a formal previously established protocol, some relevant  studies could have been omitted because of the limitations of the institutional  subscription to bibliographic databases at Universidad de Murcia. Also, 16% of  the questionnaires sent were improperly completed, or not completed.  Nevertheless, by treating these questionnaires as lost, we consider that the  final sample obtained from 156 valid questionnaires is sufficient to reach significant  conclusions. </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p><font size="3" face="Verdana"><b>REFERENCES</b> </font></p>      <!-- ref --><p>1. Dante A, Petrucci C, Lancia  L. European nursing students' academic success or failure: A post-Bologna  Declaration systematic review. </a>Nurs Educ Today. 2013; 33:46-52.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000080&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>2. Fern&aacute;ndez-Alem&aacute;n JL, Carrillo-de-Gea JM,  Rodr&iacute;guez-Mond&eacute;jar JJ. Effects of competitive  computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the  acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students.  Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31:866-71.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000082&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>3. Bonnie A, Abbie B. The  Impact of Informatics on Nursing Education: A Review of the Literature. J Contin Educ Nursing. 2009; 40:228-32.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000084&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>4. Prendes MP, Guti&eacute;rrez I. Competencias tecnol&oacute;gicas  del profesorado en las Universidades espa&ntilde;olas. Rev Educ. 2013: 196-222.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000086&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>5. Imbern&oacute;n F. La profesi&oacute;n docente en la globalizaci&oacute;n  y la sociedad del conocimiento. In: G&oacute;mez AL, Escudero-Mu&ntilde;oz JM, editors. La  formaci&oacute;n del profesorado y la mejora de la educaci&oacute;n para todos: pol&iacute;ticas y  pr&aacute;cticas. Barcelona: Octaedro; 2006.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000088&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>6.  Fern&aacute;ndez-Aleman JL. Automated Assessment in a Programming Tools Course. IEEE  Trans Educ. 2011; 54:576-81.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000090&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>7. S&aacute;nchez-Garc&iacute;a AB,  L&oacute;pez-Montesinos MJ, Fern&aacute;ndez-Alem&aacute;n JL. Wireless devices in nursing  education. Invest Educ Enferm. 2013;31(1):95-106.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000092&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p> </font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="Verdana">8. P&eacute;rez-Pe&ntilde;a R. Top  universities test the online appeal of free. &#91;Internet&#93;. 2012 (cited Aug 12  2013). Available from:  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/18/education/top-universities-test-the-online-appeal-of-free.html?_r=0" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/18/education/top-universities-test-the-online-appeal-of-free.html?_r=0</a>.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000094&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </font></p> <font size="2" face="Verdana">    <!-- ref --><p>9. World Health Organization.  eHealth Resolution, Resolution 21. 58th World Health Assembly,  Geneva:WHO; 2005.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000096&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>10. Saig&iacute; Rubi&oacute; F. Aprendizaje colaborativo en red:  el caso del Laboratorio de Telemedicina. Gac Sanit.  2011; 25:254-6.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000098&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>11. Weert T. Education of the  twenty-first century: New professionalism in lifelong learning, knowledge  development and knowledge sharing. Educ Inform Technol. 2006; 11:217-37.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000100&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>12. Rodr&iacute;guez-Mond&eacute;jar JJ,  S&aacute;nchez-Garc&iacute;a AB, Fern&aacute;ndez-Alem&aacute;n JL. Experiencia piloto con la  herramienta mooshak en un grupo de alumnos de enfermer&iacute;a: cuestionario de  satisfacci&oacute;n. Enferm glob. 2010; 9:1-10.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000102&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>13. Castro S&aacute;nchez JJ, Chirino  Alem&aacute;n E. Teachers' opinion survey on the use of ICT tools to support  attendance-based teaching. Comput Educ. 2011; 56:911-5.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000104&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>14. Liaw S-S, Huang H-M, Chen  G-D. Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Comput Educ.  2007; 49:1066-80.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000106&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>15. Mahdizadeh H, Biemans H,  Mulder M. Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by  university teachers. Comput Educ. 2008; 51:142-54.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000108&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p> </font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="Verdana">16. Crews TB, Miller JL, Brown  CM. Assessing faculty's technology needs &#91;Internet&#93;. Educause Q &#91;Internet&#93;.  2009 (cited Aug 1 2014); 32. Available from:  <a href="http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/assessing-facultys-technology-needs" target="_blank">http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/assessing-facultys-technology-needs</a></font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000110&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>17. Petit-dit-Dariel O, Wharrad  H, Windle R. Using Bourdieu's theory of practice to understand ICT use amongst  nurse educators. <a name="_ENREF_18">Nurse Educ  Today.&nbsp;2014 Feb 20.&nbsp; &#91;Epub ahead of print&#93;    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000111&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref -->. 18. Blake H. Staff  perceptions of e-learning for teaching delivery in healthcare. Learn Health Soc  Care. 2009; 8:223-34.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000112&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>19. Nguyen D, Zierler B, Nguyen  H. A Survey of Nursing Faculty Needs for Training in Use of New Technologies  for Education and Practice. J Nurs Educ. 2011; 50:181-9.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000114&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>20. McNeil BJ, Elfrink VL,  Pierce ST, Beyea SC, Bickford CJ, Averill C. Nursing informatics knowledge and  competencies: A national survey of nursing education programs in the United  States. International J Med Inform. 2005; 74:1021-30.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000116&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>21. Christianson L, Tiene D,  Luft P. Examining Online Instruction in Undergraduate Nursing Education.  Distance Educ. 2002; 23:213-29.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000118&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>22. Cooper C. A Study of  Faculty Attitudes, Perceptions, Resistance and Expectations Toward Teaching  Web-Based Learning Courses in Higher Education. In: McFerrin K, Weber R,  Carlsen R, Willis DA, editors. Society for Information Technology &amp; Teacher  Education International Conference 2008. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: AACE; 2008.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000120&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>23. National online survey of  district technology directors exploring district use of Web 2.0 technologies.  Safe Schools in a Web 2.0 World. New York: Interactive Educational Systems  Design, Inc.; 2009.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000122&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p> </font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="Verdana">24. Ferro Soto C, Mart&iacute;nez  Senra AI, Otero Neira MC. Ventajas del uso de las TICs en el proceso de  ense&ntilde;anza-aprendizaje desde la &oacute;ptica de los docentes universitarios espa&ntilde;oles. Re ElectronTec Educ &#91;Internet&#93;; Jul 2009  (cited Jul 30 2014).  Available  from: <a href="http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/revelec29/articulos_n29_pdf/5Edutec-E_Ferro-Martinez-Otero_n29.pdf" target="_blank">http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/revelec29/articulos_n29_pdf/5Edutec-E_Ferro-Martinez-Otero_n29.pdf</a></font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000124&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>25. Light D, Manso M, Rodr&iacute;guez C. Encuesta  internacional para docentes sobre el uso de la tecnolog&iacute;a para la ense&ntilde;anza:  resultados preliminares de Am&eacute;rica Latina. In: S&aacute;nchez J, editor. Congreso  Iberoamericano de Inform&aacute;tica Educativa. Santiago de Chile; 2010.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000125&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>26. Guerra S, Gonz&aacute;lez N, Garc&iacute;a R. Utilizaci&oacute;n de las  TIC por el profesorado universitario como recurso did&aacute;ctico. Comunicar. 2010; XVIII:141-8.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000127&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>27. Granado de la Orden S, Rodr&iacute;guez Rieiro C, Olmedo Lucer&oacute;n  MdC, Chac&oacute;n Garc&iacute;a A, Vigil Escribano D, Rodr&iacute;guez P&eacute;rez P. Dise&ntilde;o y validaci&oacute;n  de un cuestionario para evaluar la satisfacci&oacute;n de los pacientes atendidos en  las consultas externas de un hospital de Madrid en 2006. Rev Esp Salud P&uacute;blica.  2007; 81:637-45.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000129&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>28. Mart&iacute;nez Arribas MC. Dise&ntilde;o y validaci&oacute;n de  cuestionarios. Matronas Profesi&oacute;n. 2004; 5:23-9.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000131&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>29. Marqu&eacute;s S&aacute;nchez P, Gonz&aacute;lez P&eacute;rez M, Agra Varela Y,  Vega N&uacute;&ntilde;ez J, Pinto Carral A, Quiroga S&aacute;nchez E. Social network analysis: a  method to improve safety in healthcare organizations. Rev Esp Salud P&uacute;blica.  2013; 87:209-19.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000133&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>30. Marqu&eacute;s S&aacute;nchez P, Fern&aacute;ndez Pe&ntilde;a R, Cabrera Le&oacute;n  A, Mu&ntilde;oz- Doyague MF, Llopis-Ca&ntilde;ameras J, Arias Ramos N. La sostenibilidad del  sistema sanitario desde una perspectiva de redes sociales: una propuesta para  la promoci&oacute;n de h&aacute;bitos saludables y apoyo social. Rev Esp Salud P&uacute;blica. 2013; 87:307-15.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000135&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>31. Rodr&iacute;guez-Miranda FP,  Pozuelos-Estrada FJ, Le&oacute;n-Jariego JC. The role  of ICT coordinator. Priority and time dedicated to  professional functions. Comput Educ. 2014; 72:262-70.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000137&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>32. Salinas J. Innovaci&oacute;n docente y uso de las TIC en  la ense&ntilde;anza universitaria. Rev Univ Soc Conocimiento. 2004; 1:1-16.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>33. Lora-L&oacute;pez P. Reflexiones sobre el grado y  postgrado de Enfermer&iacute;a: la investigaci&oacute;n en Enfermer&iacute;a. Index  Enferm. 2008; 17:85-6.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000141&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>34. Bakker AR. Health care and  ICT, partnership is a must. International J Med Inform. 2002; 66:51-7.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000143&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p> </font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="Verdana">35. Base de datos de Tesis Doctorales TESEO. Ministerio de  Educaci&oacute;n, Cultura y Deporte. &#91;Internet&#93;.  2014 (cited Aug 14 2014). Available from: <a href="https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/" target="_blank">https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/</a>.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </font></p> <font size="2" face="Verdana"></font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="Verdana">36. Miras T, Alzaga &Oacute;, de  Azc&aacute;rraga J, Barber&aacute; S, Capmany J, Chulia E, et al. Propuestas para la reforma  y mejora de la calidad y eficiencia del sistema universitario espa&ntilde;ol &#91;Internet&#93;. 2013 (cited Aug 30 2013). Available  from:  <a href="http://www.mecd.gob.es/prensa-mecd/actualidad/2013/02/20130215-comision-expertos.html" target="_blank">http://www.mecd.gob.es/prensa-mecd/actualidad/2013/02/20130215-comision-expertos.html</a>.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000147&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900036&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </font></p> <font size="2" face="Verdana">    <!-- ref --><p>37. Parsons CV, DeLucia JM.  Decision making in the process of making differentiation. Learn Leading Technol. 2005; 31:8-10.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000149&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900037&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>38. Hern&aacute;ndez JM. Historia de la enfermer&iacute;a: un  an&aacute;lisis hist&oacute;rico de los cuidados de enfemer&iacute;a. Madrid: McGraw-Hill  Interamericana de Espa&ntilde;a; 1995.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000151&pid=S0120-5307201400030000900038&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dante]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Petrucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lancia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[European nursing students' academic success or failure: A post-Bologna Declaration systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nurs Educ Today]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>46-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández-Alemán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrillo-de-Gea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Mondéjar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of competitive computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nurse Educ Today]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>866-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bonnie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abbie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Impact of Informatics on Nursing Education: A Review of the Literature]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Contin Educ Nursing]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<page-range>228-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prendes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gutiérrez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Competencias tecnológicas del profesorado en las Universidades españolas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Educ]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>196-222</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Imbernón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La profesión docente en la globalización y la sociedad del conocimiento]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Escudero-Muñoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La formación del profesorado y la mejora de la educación para todos: políticas y prácticas]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Octaedro]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández-Aleman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Automated Assessment in a Programming Tools Course]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[IEEE Trans Educ]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>576-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez-García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Montesinos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández-Alemán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Wireless devices in nursing education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Invest Educ Enferm]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>95-106</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez-Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Top universities test the online appeal of free]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>World Health Organization</collab>
<source><![CDATA[eHealth Resolution, Resolution 21]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<edition>58</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Geneva ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[World Health Assembly]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saigí Rubió]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Aprendizaje colaborativo en red: el caso del Laboratorio de Telemedicina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gac Sanit]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>254-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Education of the twenty-first century: New professionalism in lifelong learning, knowledge development and knowledge sharing]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Educ Inform Technol]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>217-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Mondéjar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez-García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández-Alemán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Experiencia piloto con la herramienta mooshak en un grupo de alumnos de enfermería: cuestionario de satisfacción]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Enferm glob]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>1-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castro Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chirino Alemán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Teachers' opinion survey on the use of ICT tools to support attendance-based teaching]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comput Educ]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<page-range>911-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liaw]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S-S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H-M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G-D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comput Educ]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>1066-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahdizadeh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biemans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mulder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comput Educ]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<page-range>142-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crews]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Assessing faculty's technology needs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Educause Q]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<page-range>32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Petit-dit-Dariel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wharrad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Windle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Using Bourdieu's theory of practice to understand ICT use amongst nurse educators]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nurse Educ Today]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<month> F</month>
<day>eb</day>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blake]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Staff perceptions of e-learning for teaching delivery in healthcare]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Learn Health Soc Care]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>223-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nguyen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zierler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nguyen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A Survey of Nursing Faculty Needs for Training in Use of New Technologies for Education and Practice]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Nurs Educ]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>181-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McNeil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elfrink]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pierce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ST]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beyea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bickford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Averill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Nursing informatics knowledge and competencies: A national survey of nursing education programs in the United States]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International J Med Inform]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<page-range>1021-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Christianson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tiene]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luft]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Examining Online Instruction in Undergraduate Nursing Education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Distance Educ]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>213-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cooper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A Study of Faculty Attitudes, Perceptions, Resistance and Expectations Toward Teaching Web-Based Learning Courses in Higher Education]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McFerrin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carlsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Willis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Las Vegas^eNevada Nevada]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[AACE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[National online survey of district technology directors exploring district use of Web 2.0 technologies. Safe Schools in a Web 2.0 World]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Interactive Educational Systems Design, Inc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferro Soto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Senra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AI]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Otero Neira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Ventajas del uso de las TICs en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje desde la óptica de los docentes universitarios españoles]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Light]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Encuesta internacional para docentes sobre el uso de la tecnología para la enseñanza: resultados preliminares de América Latina]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Congreso Iberoamericano de Informática Educativa]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santiago de Chile ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guerra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Utilización de las TIC por el profesorado universitario como recurso didáctico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comunicar]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>XVIII</volume>
<page-range>141-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granado-de-la-Orden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Rieiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olmedo-Lucerón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MdC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chacón-García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vigil-Escribano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar la satisfacción de los pacientes atendidos en las consultas externas de un hospital de Madrid en 2006]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Esp Salud Pública]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<page-range>637-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Arribas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Diseño y validación de cuestionarios]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Matronas Profesión]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>23-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marqués-Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González-Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Agra-Varela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vega-Núñez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinto-Carral]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quiroga-Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Social network analysis: a method to improve safety in healthcare organizations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Esp Salud Pública]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>209-19</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marqués]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sánchez P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Peña R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[León A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz Doyague-]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Llopis-Cañameras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arias-Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[La sostenibilidad del sistema sanitario desde una perspectiva de redes sociales: una propuesta para la promoción de hábitos saludables y apoyo social]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Esp Salud Pública]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>307-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Miranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pozuelos-Estrada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[León-Jariego]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JC.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The role of ICT coordinator]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comput Educ]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<page-range>262-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salinas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Innovación docente y uso de las TIC en la enseñanza universitaria]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Univ Soc Conocimiento]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>1-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lora-López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Reflexiones sobre el grado y postgrado de Enfermería: la investigación en Enfermería]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Index Enferm]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>85-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bakker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AR.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Health care and ICT, partnership is a must]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International J Med Inform]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<page-range>51-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Base de datos de Tesis Doctorales TESEO. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alzaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ó]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Azcárraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barberá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Capmany]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chulia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Propuestas para la reforma y mejora de la calidad y eficiencia del sistema universitario español]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parsons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeLucia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Decision making in the process of making differentiation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Learn Leading Technol]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>8-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Historia de la enfermería: un análisis histórico de los cuidados de enfemería]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
