<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-8160</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista EAN]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. esc.adm.neg]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-8160</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad EAN]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-81602020000200131</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21158/01208160.n89.2020.2847</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Impacto de los derechos de propiedad intelectual sobre la innovación empresarial en Colombia: evidencia a nivel de firma]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Impact of intellectual property rights on business innovation in Colombia: evidence at firm level]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Impactos dos direitos de propriedade intelectual sobre a inovação empresarial na Colômbia: evidências empresariais]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Impact des droits de propriété intellectuelle sur l'innovation commerciale en Colombie: données probantes au niveau de l'entreprise]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quintero-Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jose Wilmar]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendoza-Lozano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Frederick Andrés]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Institución Universitaria Politécnico Grancolombiano  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>89</numero>
<fpage>131</fpage>
<lpage>154</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-81602020000200131&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-81602020000200131&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-81602020000200131&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El presente documento examina los efectos de los derechos de propiedad intelectual (DPI) sobre la innovación empresarial, en conformidad con los factores asociados a la innovación. Con base en la Encuesta Empresarial del Banco Mundial (EEBM) para el 2010 y el 2017, la innovación se describe en la clasificación del Manual de Oslo y los DPI según los acuerdos relativos a la propiedad intelectual. En este trabajo se estima un modelo probit con el fin de analizar los efectos de los DPI sobre la innovación en Colombia; se encuentra un efecto positivo y cercano al 10 % de los DPI sobre los distintos tipos de innovación, excepto para las innovaciones en proceso. Por su parte, el efecto de las patentes en las innovaciones en todos los casos es positivo y significativo. Finalmente, a fin de tratar los problemas de sesgo de selección y como método adicional, se utiliza el método de pareo propensity score matching, en el cual el grupo de tratamiento corresponde a las empresas que tienen patentes o cualquier tipo de registro de propiedad intelectual. La muestra se compone de un total de 1935 empresas. Los resultados de los efectos son positivos, especialmente para las empresas que tienen patentes o registros de propiedad intelectual siete años atrás. En conclusión, la evidencia rechaza la hipótesis de Arrow en el caso de Colombia, en el sentido de que las empresas que ya tienen un poder de monopolio generado por los DPI siguen innovando en el tiempo.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This document examines the effects of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on business innovation in accordance with the factors associated with innovation. Based on the World Bank&#8217;s Enterprise Survey (ES) for 2010 and 2017, innovation is described in the classification of the Oslo Manual and in the IPRs according to the agreements related to intellectual property. In this paper, we estimated a probit model in order to analyze the effects of the IPRs on the innovation in Colombia; resulting on a positive and close to 10% effect of IPRs on the different types of innovation, except for innovations in progress. The effect of patents on innovations is, in all cases, positive and significant. Finally, in order to deal with selection bias problems and as an additional method, we used the propensity score matching method, with a treatment group corresponding to firms that have patents or any type of intellectual property registration. The sample comprises a total of 1935 firms. The results of the effects are positive, especially for firms that have patents or intellectual property registrations established seven years ago. In conclusion, the evidence rejects Arrow's hypothesis in the case of Colombia, in the sense that firms that already have monopoly power generated by IPRs continue to innovate over time.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Este documento examina os efeitos dos direitos de propriedade intelectual (DPI) na inovação empresarial, de acordo com os fatores associados à inovação. Com base na Enquete Empresarial do Banco Mundial (EEBM) de 2010 e 2017, a inovação está descrita na classificação do Manual de Oslo e dos DPI segundo acordos relacionados à propriedade intelectual. Neste trabalho, um modelo probit é estimado para analisar os efeitos dos DPI sobre a inovação na Colômbia. Há um efeito positivo de cerca de 10% dos DPI sobre os diferentes tipos de inovação, exceto para inovações em processo. Por sua vez, o efeito das patentes nas inovações em todos os casos é positivo e significativo. Por fim, para tratar problemas de viés de seleção e como método adicional, é utilizado o método de propensity score matching, em que o grupo de tratamento corresponde às empresas que possuem patentes ou qualquer tipo de registro de propriedade intelectual. A amostra é composta por um total de 1.935 empresas. Os resultados dos efeitos são positivos, principalmente para empresas que possuem patentes ou registros de propriedade intelectual há sete anos. Em conclusão, as evidências rejeitam a hipótese de Arrow no caso da Colômbia, no sentido de que as empresas que já têm um poder de monopólio gerado pelos DPI continuem inovando ao longo do tempo.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Résumé Ce document analyse les effets des droits de propriété intellectuelle (DPI) sur l'innovation des entreprises en fonction de facteurs associés à l'innovation. Sur la base de l'enquête entrepreneuriale de la Banque Mondiale (EEBM) sur la période 2010 - 2017, l'innovation est présentée dans la classification du Manuel d'Oslo et des DPI conformément aux accords relatifs à la propriété intellectuelle. Un modèle probit sera estimé afin d'analyser les effets des DPI sur l'innovation en Colombie, où un effet positif de près de 10% du DPI impacte les différents types d'innovation, à l'exception des innovations en cours. D&#8217;un autre côté, l'impact des brevets sur les innovations est positif et significatif. Enfin, pour prendre en compte les problématiques de biais de sélection, nous utiliserons une méthodologie d'appariement du résultat de propension dans laquelle le groupe traité correspond aux entreprises détenant des brevets ou registres de propriété intellectuelle. L'échantillon se compose d'un total de 1935 entreprises. Les résultats des effets des DPI sont positifs, en particulier pour les entreprises possédant des brevets ou ayant enregistré des DPI lors des sept années d&#8217;enquête. Finalement, les faits et résultats de l&#8217;investigation rejettent l'hypothèse d'Arrow pour la Colombie dans la mesure où les entreprises ayant un certain monopole du fait des DPI continuent par ailleurs leur processus d&#8217;innovation.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[propiedad intelectual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[derechos de propiedad intelectual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[innovación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[innovación empresarial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[patentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[registros de propiedad intelectual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[intellectual property rights]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[innovation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[business innovation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[patents]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[intellectual property registrations]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[propriedade intelectual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[direitos de propriedade intelectual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[inovação, inovação empresarial;, patentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[registros de propriedade intelectual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[propriété intellectuelle]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[droits de propriété intellectuelle]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[innovation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[innovation commerciale]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[brevets]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[registres de propriété intellectuelle]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aghion]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Howitt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A model of growth through creative destruction]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Bureau of Economic Research]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Álvarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Determinantes de la innovación: evidencia en el sector manufacturero de Bogotá]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Semestre Económico]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>32</numero>
<issue>32</issue>
<page-range>129-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arora]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gambardella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Industrial Economics]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>361-79</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boldrin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The case against intellectual property]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Economic Review]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>92</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>209-12</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bronwyn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Handbook of the Economics of Innovation]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>129-213</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Amsterdam ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dixon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenhalgh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The economics of intellectual property: a review to identify themes for future research]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Oxford]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dosi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teece]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Organizational competencies and the boundaries of the firm]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Longhi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Markets and organization]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>281-302</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlín ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer-Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Forero-Pineda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laureiro-Martinez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Innovation patterns and intellectual property in SME´s of a developing country]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Innovar]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>42</numero>
<issue>42</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eisenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Science]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>280</volume>
<numero>5364</numero>
<issue>5364</issue>
<page-range>698-701</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maskus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intellectual property in a globalizing world: issues for economic research]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting &amp; Economics]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>231-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Innovation without patents: evidence from world&#8217;s fairs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Law and Economics]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>43-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mulder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Groot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. L. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hofkes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Economic growth and technological change: a comparison of insights from a neo-classical and an evolutionary perspective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Technological Forecasting and Social Change]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>151-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Chapter 9 intellectual property rights and international innovation]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maskus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Intellectual property, growth and trade]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>289-327</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bingley ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Emerald Group Publishing Limited]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pavitt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Research Policy]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>343-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prescott]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Needed: a theory of total factor productivity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Economic Review]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>525-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rossi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barrios-Aguirre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schmutzler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez-Manchola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Relación entre la estrategia de innovación de la firma y su decisión de patentar: evidencia de empresas pertenecientes al sector manufacturero colombiano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Estudios Gerenciales]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>128</numero>
<issue>128</issue>
<page-range>313-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruiz-Jiménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuentes-Fuentes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruiz-Arroyo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Knowledge Combination Capability and Innovation: The Effects of Gender Diversity on Top Management Teams in Technology-Based Firms]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Business Ethics]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>135</volume>
<page-range>503-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sweet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eterovic-Maggio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[World Development]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<page-range>665-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tidd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bessant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Estados Unidos ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[John Wiley &amp; Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intellectual property rights and innovation: evidence from health care markets]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Innovation Policy and the Economy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>53-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>WIPO</collab>
<source><![CDATA[WIPO intellectual property handbook: policy, law and use]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Ginebra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[WIPO]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.-H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.-J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.-Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Do stronger intellectual property rights induce more innovations? A Cross-country Analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>167-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
