<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-9965</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Agronomía Colombiana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Agron. colomb.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-9965</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-99652011000100006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of seed yield and oil contents in four materials of Ricinus communis L.]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación del rendimiento de semilla y contenido de aceite en cuatro materiales de Ricinus communis L.]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabrales R.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roberto Antonio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marrugo N.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Plaza T.³]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guido Armando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Cordoba Department of Agronomy ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Monteria ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Cordoba Department of Chemistry ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Monteria ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Department of Agronomy ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>01</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>43</fpage>
<lpage>48</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-99652011000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-99652011000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-99652011000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Four castor materials were evaluated in 2009 in the middle region of Valle del Sinu, Colombia. The variables were phenological development, plant height, seed production and oil yield, in order to determine the best material for commercial purposes. All materials reported high yields of oil seeds and highlighting the commercial genotype Nordestina BRS149, 2.2 t ha-1 seed and 47% oil content. Planting distances were 1.5 x 1.5 m and 2.0 x 2.0 m, with densities of 6,666 and 3,906 plants ha-1, respectively. The plant height, seed productivity and oil yield showed significant differences for the interaction density × material; while comparing each material density, seed production only showed differences. These variables were significantly different between population densities, which shows that the higher the plant height, lower productivity. The planting distance of 2.0 x 2.0 m, provides higher productivity per plant values but seed oil yields were not different between densities. The oil quality parameters were assessed using free fatty acid value, iodine, acidity index, saponification, refraction and specific gravity, found that planting distance does not affect the quality of oil.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se evaluaron cuatro materiales de higuerilla en la región media del Valle del Sinú, en el año 2009. Las variables fueron desarrollo fenológico, altura de planta, producción de semillas y rendimiento de aceite, con la finalidad de determinar el mejor material para fines comerciales. Todos los materiales reportaron altos rendimientos en semillas y aceite destacándose el genotipo comercial Nordestina BRS149, con 2,2 t ha-1 en semillas y 47% en aceite. Las distancias de siembra fueron 1,5 x 1,5 m y 2,0 x 2,0 m, con densidades de 6.666 y 3.906 plantas ha-1. Las variables altura de planta, productividad de semillas y rendimiento de aceite, presentaron diferencias significativas para la interacción material × densidad; por otra parte, al comparar la densidad de cada material, solo la producción de semillas mostró diferencias. Estas variables fueron significativamente diferentes entre densidades poblacionales, lo cual muestra que, a mayor altura de planta menor productividad. La distancia de siembra de 2,0 x 2,0 m, proporcionó los valores más altos de productividad de semillas por planta, en tanto que los rendimientos de aceite no presentaron diferencias entre densidades. La calidad de los aceites se evaluó mediante su contenido de ácidos grasos libres y yodo, y los índices de acidez, saponificación y refracción, así como la gravedad específica, encontrándose que la distancia de siembra no afecta la calidad de los aceites.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Castor bean]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[castor oil]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[biofuels]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[seed yield]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[oil yield]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[frutos de higuerilla]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aceite de higuerilla]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[biocombustibles]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[productividad de semillas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[productividad de aceite]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="verdana" size="2"> &nbsp;     <p align="center"><font size="4"><b>Evaluation of seed yield and oil contents in four materials of <i>Ricinus</i></i> <i>communis</i> L.</b></font></p>     <p>     <p align="center"><font size="3"><b>Evaluaci&oacute;n del rendimiento de semilla y contenido de aceite en cuatro materiales de <i>Ricinus</i></i> <i>communis</i> L.</b></font></p>      <p>     <p align="center"><b>Roberto Antonio Cabrales R.<sup>1,4</sup>, Jos&eacute; Luis Marrugo N.<sup>2</sup>, and Guido Armando Plaza T.<sup>3</sup></b></p>      <p> <sup>1</sup> Department of Agronomy, Universidad de Cordoba. Monteria (Colombia).    <br> <sup>2</sup> Department of Chemistry, Universidad de Cordoba. Monteria (Colombia).    <br> <sup>3</sup> Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogota (Colombia).    <br> <sup>4</sup> Corresponding authors:<a href="mailto:r-cabrales-2009@hotmail.com">r-cabrales-2009@hotmail.com</a> y <a href="mailto:jlmarrugon@hotmail.com">jlmarrugon@hotmail.com</a>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Received for publication: 11 July, 2010. Accepted for publication: 2 February, 2011.</p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>ABSTRACT </b></p>     <p>   Four castor materials were evaluated in 2009 in the middle region   of Valle del Sinu, Colombia. The variables were phenological   development, plant height, seed production and oil yield, in   order to determine the best material for commercial purposes.   All materials reported high yields of oil seeds and highlighting   the commercial genotype Nordestina BRS149, 2.2 t ha<sup>-1</sup> seed and   47% oil content. Planting distances were 1.5 x 1.5 m and 2.0   x 2.0 m, with densities of 6,666 and 3,906 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively.   The plant height, seed productivity and oil yield showed   significant differences for the interaction density Ã— material;   while comparing each material density, seed production only   showed differences. These variables were significantly different   between population densities, which shows that the higher the   plant height, lower productivity. The planting distance of 2.0 x   2.0 m, provides higher productivity per plant values but seed   oil yields were not different between densities. The oil quality   parameters were assessed using free fatty acid value, iodine,   acidity index, saponification, refraction and specific gravity,   found that planting distance does not affect the quality of oil.</p>     <p><b>Key words:</b> Castor bean, castor oil, biofuels, seed yield, oil yield.</p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>Se evaluaron cuatro materiales de higuerilla en la regi&oacute;n media   del Valle del Sin&uacute;, en el a&ntilde;o 2009. Las variables fueron desarrollo   fenol&oacute;gico, altura de planta, producci&oacute;n de semillas y   rendimiento de aceite, con la finalidad de determinar el mejor   material para fines comerciales. Todos los materiales reportaron   altos rendimientos en semillas y aceite destac&aacute;ndose el genotipo   comercial Nordestina BRS149, con 2,2 t ha<sup>-1</sup> en semillas y 47%   en aceite. Las distancias de siembra fueron 1,5 x 1,5 m y 2,0 x 2,0   m, con densidades de 6.666 y 3.906 plantas ha<sup>-1</sup>. Las variables   altura de planta, productividad de semillas y rendimiento de   aceite, presentaron diferencias significativas para la interacci&oacute;n   material Ã— densidad; por otra parte, al comparar la densidad de   cada material, solo la producci&oacute;n de semillas mostr&oacute; diferencias.   Estas variables fueron significativamente diferentes entre   densidades poblacionales, lo cual muestra que, a mayor altura   de planta menor productividad. La distancia de siembra de 2,0   x 2,0 m, proporcion&oacute; los valores m&aacute;s altos de productividad   de semillas por planta, en tanto que los rendimientos de aceite   no presentaron diferencias entre densidades. La calidad de los   aceites se evalu&oacute; mediante su contenido de &aacute;cidos grasos libres   y yodo, y los &iacute;ndices de acidez, saponificaci&oacute;n y refracci&oacute;n, as&iacute;   como la gravedad espec&iacute;fica, encontr&aacute;ndose que la distancia de siembra no afecta la calidad de los aceites.</p>      <p><b>Palabras clave:</b> frutos de higuerilla, aceite de higuerilla, biocombustibles, productividad de semillas, productividad de aceite.</p> <hr size="1">     <p><b><font size="3">Introduction</font></b></p>     <p>   The castor bean (<i><i>Ricinus</i></i> <i>communis</i> L.) is a plant that is   distributed throughout much of the world in the wild and   small crops in warmer regions (Tongoona, 1993; Vijaya,   1997). Its great feature is the potential for the production   of industrial oils, which have various applications in   fields such as medicine, cosmetics and more recently, the   energy in the production of biodiesel that aims to reduce   consumption of petroleum and reduce environmental pollution,   making the species in an operational alternative for   men (Gutierrez <i>et al</i>., 2007). In Colombia, the castor is a   promising species due to the great adaptability in most of   its thermal levels, achieving high yields of seed yield and   quality of their oils, allowing its application in various   industrial sectors (Delgado, 2006). In some Colombian   regions, such as Antioquia, Caldas, Santander and Tolima,   were evaluated on a small scale some native materials using   pattern matching as Brazilian and Ecuatorian genotypes.   These in order to improve farming techniques and to obtain high quality oils and yields, which determine the viability of castor crop projection on a large scale for industrial   production of the oils in these areas. Gutierrez <i>et al</i>. (2007)   confirm this with the evaluation of four genotypes of castor   oil in warm area of the department of Caldas, where   the two genotypes identified imported from Ecuador show   higher productivity (12.74 kg plot<sup>-1</sup>) from the National Native   Cauca Valley Coffee region of Manizales (average of 6.0   kg plot<sup><sup>-1</sup></sup>). As for the quality of castor oil, Bailey <i>et al</i>. (2005)   recommended some of the characteristics established by   the American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS) of the <a href="#t1">Tab. 1</a>.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t1"></a><img src="img/revistas/agc/v29n1/v29n1a06t1.jpg">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Castor oil is distinguished from others by its high rate   of acetyl or hydroxyl, and other oils with similar iodine   because of its high density. Unlike other oils, is miscible   in all proportions with alcohol, but at room temperature is only slightly soluble in petroleum ether (Bailey, 2005).</p>     <p>   Currently, the department of Cordoba, where the castor   grows wild in most parts of the territory, reaching heights   up to 4 m and there is no knowledge on the productive performance   in terms of seeds and oils of native and imported   materials that could be grown in warm weather conditions   and silty clay soils that characterize this region (IGAC,   1983). Therefore, this study aims at evaluation of four materials   of R. <i>communis</i> in the production and the quality   of the oils, in search of alternatives viable and profitable   production in the study area, Valle del Sinu.</p> &nbsp;     <p><b><font size="3">Materials and methods</font></b></p>     <p> <b>Agronomic evaluation </b></p>     <p>   This study was conducted at the Experimental Farm,   Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Cordoba   (Unicor), located in the middle region of Valle del Sinu,   which belongs to the municipality of Monteria, Cordoba,   located 15 meters, annual rainfall of 1,303 mm, 80% relative   humidity and average temperature of 28Â°C. The area is   characterized by a soil usually composed of fine materials   (silt, clay and fine sand), less permeable, allowing water   logging in rainy and dry periods cracking (IGAC, 1983).</p>     <p>The four materials used in this research Castor were three   natives: Monteria, Ci&eacute;naga de Oro and Los C&oacute;rdobas   (names taken from the collection sites in the department)   and the improved variety and imported from Brazil   (Nordestina BRS149). The planting was three (3) seeds   per site, making a thinning at 40 days, leaving only one   plant (1) and a population of 100% between plots and   subplots. In the test group, the materials were evaluated   during a period of 8 months. Planting was done the first   week of February 2009 (summer time and application of   sprinkler irrigation). We used a split-plot experimental   design, arranged at random with three repetitions. The   main plots were the genotypes Monteria, Cienaga de   Oro and a commercial control Nordestina BRS 149. The   subplots were in two-plant spacing of 1.5 m x 1.5 m in   subplots of 6 x 7.5 m, with 30 plants for a plant density of   6,666 plants ha<sup>-1</sup> (A), and 2 x 2 meters, in subplots of 8 m   x 8 m, with 25 plants for planting density of 3906 plants   ha<sup>-1</sup> (B). The total experimental units were 12 plots and   24 subplots for a total area of 1,344 m<sup>2</sup> per experimental   sampling unit and as all the plants in each subplot (including plants border).</p>     <p>   The variables evaluated were: phenological development,   days to germination, days to produce the first flowers, days   to flowering, days from start to completion of harvest (these   variables were assessed at the time when the population   reached more than 50% change phenological stage), plant   height and seed production. The data of plant height and   seed production were analyzed with the method of analysis   of variance (ANOVA P<u>&lt;</u>0.05) and mean comparison tests (Duncan test) with SAS software version 9.1.</p>     <p>Oil extraction   The seeds collected from each material were dried initially   grown under conditions suggested by Madrid et al. (1997)   (<a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a>). This process prior to oil extraction, was required to   determine the water content of castor seeds for experimental   material, in plots and subplots (A and B). Subsequently,   each subplot was taken by three (3) samples of 10 g. Dry   seed, crushed shell and for determining the oil content by   ether extraction method (AOAC, 1990) using benzine as   extractant (<a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a>). Thus extractions were performed 24   total, 6 per material and 4 plot subplot. The data obtained   were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA P<u>&lt;</u>0.05) and mean comparison tests (Duncan test) with SAS software version 9.1.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t2"></a><img src="img/revistas/agc/v29n1/v29n1a06t2.jpg">     <p><b>Evaluation of oil quality </b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The oil quality analysis were made according to ASTM standards (2000), for the determination of free fatty acid content (ASTM D5555), saponification value (ASTM D5558) and iodine value (ATSM D5554), as well measurement of specific gravity (ASTM D5355). Moreover, the refractive index was calculated using an Abbe refractometer Model LR45227 (Fisher Scientific) with a temperature of 25Â°C.</p> &nbsp;    <p><b><font size="3">Results and discussion</font></b></p>     <p>   The seedling emergence was between 7 and 9 days after   sowing, highlighting the potential for germination earliness   and Nordestina BRS149 genotype, this is most certainly   improved the quality of the seed. It is established that the   emergence of the seedling of castor in hot weather (typical   of the middle region of Valle del Sinu, 28Â° C) with temperatures   above 30Â° C, occurring at 6 days (Soares and Souza,   2007) (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>).</p>     <p align="center"><a name="f1"></a><img src="img/revistas/agc/v29n1/v29n1a06f1.jpg">     <p>As at the beginning of flowering, native material was the   most precocious Monteria (53 days) on the other materials,   Ci&eacute;naga de Oro, Los Cordobas and Nordestina BRS149   (60, 65 and 76 days respectively), the latter being the latest.   In other places where the material is grown Nordestina   BRS149, the onset of flowering was 80 days (Camacho <i>et   al</i>., 2008). The duration of the flowering stage of the four   materials averaged 82 days, however, there was contrast   between the times of flowering of native materials with   the commercial, as this was more delayed 102 days, which may be favorable to obtain high yields of seed and oil yield.</p>     <p>   The harvest of native materials initiated earlier (109 days on   average) than the material Nordestina BRS149 (137 days),   presenting the material Monteria earlier age (103 days).   Normally the seed crop is considered precocious if it started   at 120 days and 150 days late (MAG, 2006). Furthermore,   the completion of the harvest which determines the cycle of   the crop of castor, did not show marked differences between   native materials (243 days on average), which proved to be   more precocious than the commercial genotype statistically   significant difference, culminating the growth cycle in 273   days. With respect to the duration of the harvest was so   prominent earlier material (Monteria) with completion of   harvest to 241 days and Nordestina BRS149 (late variety)   with production times of 188 and 197 days respectively,   while the other materials (Los Cordobas and the Ci&eacute;naga   de Oro) had less productive ranges (180 and 183 days   respectively). The production time was considered from   the beginning of flowering until the end of the harvest.</p>     <p>As shown in height of the plant parameter and seed production,   genotypes, no statistically significant differences,   while the oil yield significant differences between native   and commercial materials. The genotype Nordestina   BRS149 stands with higher values in oil yield (3% higher),   probably due to the duration of flowering and production   (Gutierrez <i>et al</i>., 2007). Among the native materials were   no significant differences (P = 0.05) in mean values for the   variables seed production and oil yield. The Ci&eacute;naga de Oro   native material stands with values greater seed production   (0.73 kg) the materials Monteria and Los Cordobas, which presented similar productions (9.72 and 9.34 kg).</p>     <p>   Plant height of the four materials tested showed a mean of   3.50 Â± 0.10 m, which allows sorting of tall (values greater   than 2 m size are considered high) (Escoto, 2006).</p>     <p>   The values obtained for plant height, seed production and   oil yield for each material densities (subplot A: 1.5 x 1.5 m:   6,666 plant ha<sup>-1</sup> and subplot B: 2.0 x 2.0 m: 3,906 plant ha<sup>-1</sup>)   are shown in <a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>.</p>     <p>The effect of competition between plants is clearly reflected   in the variable height, where taller plants presented with   planting distance of 1.5 meters (higher density of planting),   except, in the Cienaga de Oro material in the which the   highest value was obtained at a greater distance (shortest distance from sowing) (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a name="t3"></a><img src="img/revistas/agc/v29n1/v29n1a06t3.jpg">     <p>Regarding seed production, the highest values were obtained   with the material and within the Nordestina with   the greatest distance (12.52 kg plant<sup>-1</sup>). Among the native   materials, it is highlighted Monteria production of 10 kg   plant-1 at planting distance 1.5 x 1.5 m. It is important to   note that seed production was higher at greater distances   from seed, except in Monteria in which material was greater   than 1.5 x 1.5 m (Tab. 3). On the other hand, the material   at a shorter distance Los Cordobas showed the lowest seed   yield with 37% less production than the highest value obtained at follow up (Nordestina: 2.0 x 2.0 m).</p>     <p>The highest values of the percentage of oil yield improved   material presented in the two planting distances, values   statistically higher than those obtained with native materials.   Among the group of native materials are not significant   differences and the highest values were obtained with the   distance of 1.5 x 1.5 m except Ci&eacute;naga de Oro, the least   explicit material difference between the two distances (0.46 %) (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>).     <p>   By adding the above results to those obtained in the   variables beginning of flowering, flowering time, start   and end of crop harvest, there is the benefit to the genetic   improvement of native materials, Nordestina BRS149 case,   expressed in facilities benefit agronomic management   of these cultivars as cash crops. The same comparison   between native materials does not show significant differences.</p>     <p>The results presented in <a href="#t4">Tab. 4</a>, indicate that the four   materials tested can be adapted for planting densities of   6,666 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>, using plant spacing of 1.5 x 1.5 m, giving   an average production of seeds 2,126 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (2.2 t ha<sup>-1</sup> approximately) and average oil yield of 44%. Which turns   out to be quite good when compared to the improved material,   such as BRS149 Northeastern variety, in other places   its production of seeds was 2 to 5 t ha<sup>-1</sup> oil yields reaching   49% (Embrapa, 2008). It also emphasized that the results   obtained in this study for the four materials evaluated   in seed production and oil yield were good. The having   better commercial production Nordestina BRS149 genotype (2177.8 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) and oil yield of 47 %, followed by material Cienaga de Oro (1948.0 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) and oil yield of 43%, those of lower production were Monteria and Los Cordobas with values of 1788.8 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> and 1779.2 kg ha<sup>-1 </sup>respectively and the same oil yields (43%).</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t4"></a><img src="img/revistas/agc/v29n1/v29n1a06t4.jpg">     <p>In <a href="#t5">Tab. 5</a> are the average values of physicochemical analysis   evaluated oils castor materials. Through an analysis   of variance shows no significant differences between the   results obtained for the subplots A and B of any of the four   materials, therefore studied planting distances are not a   factor influencing the quality of oil.</p>     <p align="center"><a name="t5"></a><img src="img/revistas/agc/v29n1/v29n1a06t5.jpg">     <p>Of particular interest is lower acidity and percentage of   free fatty acids in native materials (Monteria, Ci&eacute;naga de   Oro and Los Cordobas) which for all parcels were below   the Nordestina commercial material, indicating that the   oils of the materials natives could be oxidized with a bit more difficult.</p>     <p>   Point is very important too, that all the parameters are   within the ranges of the <a href="#t1">Tab. 1</a>, except some saponification   values that are above what is expected for all native   materials (Monteria, Los Cordobas and Ci&eacute;naga de Oro)   showing another difference with the commercial material   Nor destina. Although saponification is usually related   to the average molecular weight of oil, this is a difficult measure accurately when defining oil.</p> &nbsp;    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b><font size="3">Conclusions </font></b></p>     <p>   This research showed that agro-climatic conditions of the   middle region of Valle del Sin&uacute; are suitable for the cultivation   of castor, for it was evident that the four materials   tested had good results in production of seed and oil yield,   also showed a characteristic phenology early materials,   which may allow the development of two production cycles   per year.</p>     <p>   It highlights the commercial genotype for high seed production   (2,177.75 kg ha<sup>-1)</sup> and oil yield (47%) compared to   native materials analyzed.</p>     <p>   The Ci&eacute;naga de Oro native material is known for its high   seed yield (1948.03 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) with no difference in the yield   of oil (43%).</p>     <p>   The comparison between densities shows significant differences   in plant height and seed production and, at higher   altitudes lowers productivity but no differences in oil yield.</p>     <p>   The study highlights the planting distance of 2.0 x 2.0 m,   with values higher seed productivity than the distance of   1.5 x 1.5 meters.</p>     <p>The quality of the oils is not significant differences by   relating them to the variable spacing. Meanwhile, some   physicochemical properties such as acidity and saponification,   show different values together for all native materials compared to commercial material Nordestina.</p> &nbsp;    <p><b><font size="3">Literature cited </font></b></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Akpan U.G., A. Jimoh and A.D. Mohammed. 2006. Extraction,   characterization and modification of Castor seed oil. Leonardo J. Sci. 5(8): 43-52.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000061&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   AOAC (Association of Official <i>Analytical</i> Chemists). 1990. Official   Methods of Analysis. 15th edition. AOAC. Washington D.C. 1422 p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000062&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). 2000. Methods   of Analysis D5355, D5554, D5555 and D5558. Book of Standards, Volume 15.05. Washington D.C. 2959 p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000063&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Bailey, A.E. 2005. Industrial Oil and Fat Products. 6th edition. Volume 1. Jhon Wiley &amp; Sons. New Jersey, USA, 606 p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000064&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p> Camacho, A., L. Soares y J.&Aacute;guila. 2008. Evaluaci&oacute;n de cuatro   cultivares de higuerilla (<i>Ricinus communis</i> L.) en la selva del Per&uacute;, regi&oacute;n de Ucayali (2007). In: III Congreso Brasileiro de Mamona. Salvador- Bah&iacute;a (Brasil),<a href="http://cnpa.embrapa.br/ produtos/mamona/publicacoes/cbm3/trabalhos/MELHORAMENTO%20GENETICO/MG%2017.pdf"target="_blank">http://cnpa.embrapa.br/ produtos/mamona/publicacoes/cbm3/trabalhos/MELHORAMENTO%20GENETICO/MG%2017.pdf</a>; consulta: April, 2010.      &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000065&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Delgado, F. 2006. La Higuerilla: petr&oacute;leo verde. In: <a href="http://rds.org. co/aa/img_upload/fc51bb4fd8b1d87cba819ab602ad30b8/ La_Higuerilla.pdf"target="_blank">http://rds.org. co/aa/img_upload/fc51bb4fd8b1d87cba819ab602ad30b8/ La_Higuerilla.pdf</a>; consulta:January, 2009.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000066&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Embrapa (Empresa Brasilera de Pesquisa Agropecuaria). 2008. Higuerilla BRS 149 Nordestina. In: <a href="http://colbio.com/nordestina. pdf"target="_blank">http://colbio.com/nordestina. pdf</a>; consulta:January, 2010.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000067&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Escoto, T. 2006. Taller para el aprovechamiento de la higuerilla y   tule en la elaboraci&oacute;n de amate y papiro en Amatit&aacute;n. Revista Vinculaci&oacute;n y Ciencia, 9: 54-58.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000068&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Gutierrez, G., A. Hurtado y J.F. Restrepo. 2007. Evaluaci&oacute;n de cuatro   genotipos de higuerilla (<i>Ricinus</i> <i>communis</i> L.) en zona c&aacute;lida   del departamento de Caldas. In: Memorias Primer Congreso   Internacional del Cultivo, Procesamiento y Aplicaciones de   la Higuerilla. Universidad Eafit, Medellin (Colombia), 220p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000069&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   IGAC (Instituto Geogr&aacute;fico Agust&iacute;n Codazzi). 1983. Estudio general   de los suelos de los municipios que conforman la parte media y   baja de la cuenca del Sin&uacute; (Departamento de C&oacute;rdoba). Informe   T&eacute;cnico. Litograf&iacute;a IGAC, Bogot&aacute;, 236 p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000070&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Madrid, V., C. Del Castillo y C. Madrid. 1997. Manual de Aceites   y Grasas Comestibles. Primera edici&oacute;n. Ediciones Madrid   Vicente. Barcelona, Espa&ntilde;a, 345p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000071&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>MAG (Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganader&iacute;a). 2006. Aspectos t&eacute;cnicos sobre 45 cultivos agr&iacute;colas de Costa Rica: Higuerilla. Direcci&oacute;n General de Investigaciones y extensi&oacute;n Agr&iacute;cola. San Jos&eacute;, Costa Rica. In: <a href="http://www.mag.go.cr/bibioteca_virtual_ ciencia/tec-higuerilla.pdf"target="_blank">http://www.mag.go.cr/bibioteca_virtual_ ciencia/tec-higuerilla.pdf</a>; consulta: February, 2010.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000072&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Soares, L. y T. Souza. 2007. El cultivo de la higuerilla. In: Memorias   Primer Congreso Internacional del Cultivo, Procesamiento   y Aplicaciones de la Higuerilla, Universidad Eafit, Medellin   (Colombia), 220p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000073&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Tongoona, P. 1.993. Castor (<i>Ricinus</i> <i>communis</i> L.) research and   production prospects in Zimbabwe. Industrial Crops and   Products, 1: 235-239.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000074&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Vijaya, P. 1.997. Influence of moisture, thermal and photoperiodic   regimes on the productivity of castor beans (<i>Ricinus</i> <i>communis</i>   L.). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 88: 279-289.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000075&pid=S0120-9965201100010000600015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akpan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jimoh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohammed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Extraction, characterization and modification of Castor seed oil.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Leonardo J. Sci]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>43-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists).</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Official Methods of Analysis]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<edition>15th edition</edition>
<page-range>1422 p</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington D.C. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[AOAC]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials).</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Methods of Analysis D5355, D5554, D5555 and D5558]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<month>.</month>
<volume>15.05</volume>
<page-range>2959 p.</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington D.C. ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bailey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Industrial Oil and Fat Products]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>Volume 1.</volume>
<edition>6th edition.</edition>
<page-range>606 p.</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New Jersey ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Jhon Wiley & Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camacho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Águila]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Evaluación de cuatro cultivares de higuerilla (Ricinus communis L.) en la selva del Perú, región de Ucayali (2007).]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Salvador- Bahía ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[III Congreso Brasileiro de Mamona]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delgado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La Higuerilla: petróleo verde]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Embrapa (Empresa Brasilera de Pesquisa Agropecuaria).</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Higuerilla BRS 149 Nordestina]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Escoto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Taller para el aprovechamiento de la higuerilla y tule en la elaboración de amate y papiro en AmatitÃ¡n]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Vinculación y Ciencia]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>54-58</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gutierrez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurtado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Restrepo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación de cuatro genotipos de higuerilla (Ricinus communis L.) en zona cÃ¡lida del departamento de Caldas. In: Memorias Primer Congreso Internacional del Cultivo, Procesamiento y Aplicaciones de la Higuerilla]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>220p.</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Medellin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Eafit]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>IGAC (Instituto GeogrÃ¡fico Agustín Codazzi)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Estudio general de los suelos de los municipios que conforman la parte media y baja de la cuenca del Sinú (Departamento de Córdoba).]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<page-range>236 p.</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[BogotÃ¡ ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Litografía IGAC]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Madrid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Del Castillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Madrid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Manual de Aceites y Grasas Comestibles. Primera edición. Ediciones Madrid Vicente]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>345p</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>MAG (Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería).</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Aspectos técnicos sobre 45 cultivos agrícolas de Costa Rica: Higuerilla. Dirección General de Investigaciones y extensión Agrícola. San José, Costa Rica.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El cultivo de la higuerilla. In: Memorias Primer Congreso Internacional del Cultivo, Procesamiento y Aplicaciones de la Higuerilla]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>220p.</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Medellin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Eafit]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tongoona]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Industrial Crops and ProductsCastor (Ricinus communis L.) research and production prospects in Zimbabwe]]></source>
<year>1.99</year>
<month>3</month>
<volume>1:</volume>
<page-range>235-239</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vijaya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of moisture, thermal and photoperiodic regimes on the productivity of castor beans (Ricinus communis L.).]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agricultural and Forest Meteorology]]></source>
<year>1.99</year>
<month>7</month>
<volume>88</volume>
<page-range>279-289</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
