<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-9965</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Agronomía Colombiana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Agron. colomb.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-9965</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-99652012000100003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Agronomical evaluation of cape gooseberries (Physalis peruviana L.) from central and north-eastern Colombia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación agronómica de materiales de uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.), provenientes del centro y nor-oriente colombiano]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herrera M]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Axel Mauricio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gerhard]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chacón S]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Isabel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Faculty of Agronomy Department of Agronomy]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Corresponding author. michacons@unal.edu.co  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>15</fpage>
<lpage>24</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-99652012000100003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-99652012000100003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-99652012000100003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The aim of the present study was to evaluate agronomical traits in a germplasm collection of cape gooseberry from central and north-eastern Colombia in order to measure the variability of the collection in relation to the geographic origin of the accessions and their biological status (cultivated, feral and undetermined). For this purpose, a total of 54 accessions from the departments of Norte de Santander, Santander, Boyacá and Cundinamarca was evaluated using 30 descriptors (23 quantitative and seven qualitative) by means of a principal component analysis (PCA) applied to the quantitative variables and a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) applied to the qualitative variables. The first two PCA components explained 52.42% of the total variation. The first component (39.79%) was positively related to the weight and fruit size and negatively to the pH and maturity index. A hierarchical classification analysis based on the continuous variables resulted into two classes with contrasting affinities, with 94.37% of the cultivated accessions grouped into class 2 and 64% of the undetermined accessions grouped into class 1. The first three MCA axes explained 48.48% of the total variation. The first one (20.51%) was related to strong serosity, medium fruit size and absence of damage caused by Phoma sp. A hierarchical classification analysis based on the categorical variables resulted in four classes (A, B, C, and D); with one of them (class B) containing five accessions characterized by having strong serosity and absence of damage caused by insects and pathogens.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[El presente estudio propuso como objetivo la evaluación agronómica de una colección de germoplasma de uchuva proveniente de la región andina del centro y nor-oriente de Colombia, con el fin de medir la variabilidad y representatividad de los materiales de la colección en relación a su procedencia geográfica y situación de colecta (cultivada, asilvestrada o indeterminada). Se evaluaron 54 entradas provenientes de los departamentos de Norte de Santander, Santander, Boyacá y Cundinamarca, mediante el uso de 30 descriptores (23 cuantitativos y siete cualitativos) analizados mediante un análisis de componentes principales (ACP) para las variables cuantitativas y un análisis de correspondencia múltiple (ACM) para las variables cualitativas. Los dos primeros componentes del ACP explicaron el 52,42% de la variabilidad total; el primero (39,79%) reunió variables vinculadas a peso y tamaño de fruto y de manera negativa lo hicieron el pH y el índice de madurez. La clasificación jerárquica generó dos grupos con afinidades contrastantes hacia los materiales cultivados (94,37% se agruparon en la clase 2) e indeterminados (64% se agruparon en la clase 1). El ACM retuvo el 48,48% de la variabilidad total para los tres primeros ejes, el primer eje (20,51%) reunió las variables serosidad fuerte, tamaño mediano de fruto y ausencia de daño por Phoma sp. La clasificación jerárquica determinó la conformación de cuatro grupos (A, B, C y D), destacándose la clase B que agrupó cinco entradas sobresalientes por su serosidad fuerte y ausencia de afecciones causadas por insectos y patógenos.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[germplasm collection]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[variability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[hierarchical classification]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fruit]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[serosity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[colección de germoplasma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[variabilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[clasificación jerárquica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fruto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[serosidad]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font size="2" face="verdana">     <p><font size="4">       <center>     <b>    Agronomical evaluation of cape gooseberries (<i>Physalis        peruviana</i> L.) from central and north-eastern Colombia      </b>   </center> </font></p>     <p><font size="3">       <center>     <b> Evaluaci&oacute;n agron&oacute;mica de materiales de uchuva (<i>Physalis        peruviana</i> L.),      provenientes del centro y nor-oriente colombiano      </b>   </center> </font></p>     <p>       <center>     Axel Mauricio Herrera M.<sup>1</sup>, Gerhard Fischer<sup>1</sup>, and Mar&iacute;a Isabel Chac&oacute;n S.<sup>1, 2</sup>    </center> </p>     <p><sup>1</sup> Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogota (Colombia).     <br>  <sup>2</sup> Corresponding author. <a href="mailto:michacons@unal.edu.co">michacons@unal.edu.co</a></p>     <p>Received for publication: 6 July, 2011. Accepted for publication: 1 March, 2012. </p> <hr size="1">    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>ABSTRACT</b>     <p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate agronomical traits   in a germplasm collection of cape gooseberry from central and   north-eastern Colombia in order to measure the variability   of the collection in relation to the geographic origin of the   accessions and their biological status (cultivated, feral and   undetermined). For this purpose, a total of 54 accessions from   the departments of Norte de Santander, Santander, Boyac&aacute;   and Cundinamarca was evaluated using 30 descriptors (23   quantitative and seven qualitative) by means of a principal   component analysis (PCA) applied to the quantitative variables   and a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) applied to the   qualitative variables. The first two PCA components explained   52.42% of the total variation. The first component (39.79%) was   positively related to the weight and fruit size and negatively to   the pH and maturity index. A hierarchical classification analysis   based on the continuous variables resulted into two classes with   contrasting affinities, with 94.37% of the cultivated accessions   grouped into class 2 and 64% of the undetermined accessions   grouped into class 1. The first three MCA axes explained 48.48%   of the total variation. The first one (20.51%) was related to strong   serosity, medium fruit size and absence of damage caused by   <i>Phoma</i> sp. A hierarchical classification analysis based on the   categorical variables resulted in four classes (A, B, C, and D);   with one of them (class B) containing five accessions characterized   by having strong serosity and absence of damage caused   by insects and pathogens.</p>     <p><b>Key words:</b> germplasm collection, variability, hierarchical   classification, fruit, serosity. </p> <hr size="1">    <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>El presente estudio propuso como objetivo la evaluaci&oacute;n   agron&oacute;mica de una colecci&oacute;n de germoplasma de uchuva   proveniente de la regi&oacute;n andina del centro y nor-oriente de Colombia,   con el fin de medir la variabilidad y representatividad   de los materiales de la colecci&oacute;n en relaci&oacute;n a su procedencia   geogr&aacute;fica y situaci&oacute;n de colecta (cultivada, asilvestrada o   indeterminada). Se evaluaron 54 entradas provenientes de los   departamentos de Norte de Santander, Santander, Boyac&aacute; y   Cundinamarca, mediante el uso de 30 descriptores (23 cuantitativos   y siete cualitativos) analizados mediante un an&aacute;lisis   de componentes principales (ACP) para las variables cuantitativas   y un an&aacute;lisis de correspondencia m&uacute;ltiple (ACM) para   las variables cualitativas. Los dos primeros componentes del   ACP explicaron el 52,42% de la variabilidad total; el primero   (39,79%) reuni&oacute; variables vinculadas a peso y tama&ntilde;o de fruto   y de manera negativa lo hicieron el pH y el &iacute;ndice de madurez.   La clasificaci&oacute;n jer&aacute;rquica gener&oacute; dos grupos con afinidades   contrastantes hacia los materiales cultivados (94,37% se agruparon   en la clase 2) e indeterminados (64% se agruparon en   la clase 1). El ACM retuvo el 48,48% de la variabilidad total   para los tres primeros ejes, el primer eje (20,51%) reuni&oacute; las   variables serosidad fuerte, tama&ntilde;o mediano de fruto y ausencia   de da&ntilde;o por <i>Phoma</i> sp. La clasificaci&oacute;n jer&aacute;rquica determin&oacute;   la conformaci&oacute;n de cuatro grupos (A, B, C y D), destac&aacute;ndose   la clase B que agrup&oacute; cinco entradas sobresalientes por su serosidad   fuerte y ausencia de afecciones causadas por insectos   y pat&oacute;genos.</p>     <p><b>Palabras clave:</b> colecci&oacute;n de germoplasma, variabilidad,   clasificaci&oacute;n jer&aacute;rquica, fruto, serosidad.</p> <hr size="1">    <p><font size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font> </p>     <p>The area of origin and diversification of cape gooseberry    (<i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L.) (Solanaceae) is in the Andean zone,    mainly in Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, from where it    was introduced to different climates in tropical, subtropical    and temperate regions (Hawkes, 1991). According to    Br&uuml;cher (1989), the <i>Physalis</i> genus has a few representatives    in the Old World but most of the species are American in origin, with the main center of diversity in Mexico and    only a dozen species present in South America. Vargas <i>et al</i>. (2001) reported approximately 85 species in the <i>Physalis</i>    genus with and nearly half of them (about 46 species)    endemic to Mexico. </p>     <p>Currently, more than 80 ecotypes of cape gooseberry have    been reported worldwide on the basis of plant habit, shape    of calyx, and size, color and taste of the fruit (Rodr&iacute;guez and Bueno, 2006); among these we can find the ecotypes    'Colombia', 'Peru' and 'Kenya'. The Colombian ecotype    is characterized by producing a higher number of fruits    per plant and smaller fruits with a more attractive color    and higher sugar content than the African ecotypes ('Kenya'    and 'South Africa') (Fischer, 1995). These qualities    make the Colombian cape gooseberry more competitive    in international markets, placing Colombia among the    main producers of this fruit (Fischer <i>et al</i>., 2007). For this    reason, <i>P. peruviana</i>, though in need of improved crop    management practices, has become an important genetic    resource for Colombia (Lagos, 2006). Germplasm collections    and their proper conservation, documentation and    evaluation may contribute to the development of breeding    strategies and maintenance of the species by allowing the    identification of promising accessions for future selection    and breeding programs (Bonilla <i>et al</i>., 2008).</p>     <p>In Colombia, Arbel&aacute;ez and Mora (1990) evaluated phenotypic    traits in 68 materials of the Physalis genus preserved    at the germplasm bank of the Corpoica Research Center    La Selva in Rio Negro; 33 of them belonging to <i>P. peruviana</i>, mainly from the Antioquia department. Among the    36 descriptors analyzed, the size and color of the mature    fruit and the size of the plant at flowering showed the    highest variability. Within the same study, Ligarreto <i>et al</i>. (2005), by means of a principal component analysis    (PCA), observed that the first component explained    44.44% of the total variance and the most important    variables were those related to the pubescence in the    leaves and shoots, leaf number during the juvenile phase    (below the first flower) and flowering time. The second    component explained 10.21% of the total variance and    was only explained by the fruit size. Later, Trillos <i>et al</i>.    (2008) evaluated morphological traits in 46 accessions of    cape gooseberry from the La Selva germplasm bank using    40 qualitative and quantitative variables, which contributed    to the differentiation between accessions (72.5% and    93.11%, respectively). Among the variables with the largest    coefficient of variation were traits of a quantitative nature    such as percentage of cracked fruits, calyx weight, fruit    weight and number of fruits per plant, suggesting that the    selection of parental individuals should take quantitative    characteristics into account.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The Universidad de Nari&ntilde;o in Pasto (Colombia) holds a    collection of 50 genotypes comprised of the regional accessions    that were collected and morphologically evaluated    by Hejeile and Ibarra (2001). These authors, by means    of a PCA applied to 12 quantitative variables, identified    for the first three components, 70% of the collection    variability. The variables that contributed the most to these    three components were fruit weight and diameter, leaf size    and flower development until fruit setting (first fruit).</p>     <p>The Universidad Nacional de Colombia in Palmira owns    a collection of 222 accessions from the departments of    Nari&ntilde;o, Valle del Cauca, Cauca, Caldas and Cundinamarca.    From this collection, Bonilla <i>et al</i>. (2008) evaluated    morphologically 24 accessions based on 10 qualitative    and 17 quantitative variables by means of a multiple correspondence    analysis (MCA) and a PCA, respectively.    This study showed that the quantitative variables that explained    most of the observed variability were those related    to fruit characteristics such as fruit weight, transversal    and longitudinal fruit length, seed number and soluble    solids content. Likewise, Madri&ntilde;&aacute;n (2010) evaluated, by    means of a conglomerate analysis, 29 accessions of this    collection based on seven qualitative and 10 quantitative    characters and identified five groups differing in qualitative    variables like fruit shape and color.</p>     <p>In Colombia, germplasm evaluations of <i>P. peruviana</i>    have mainly focused on the diversity of the central and    southwestern Andean zones, where attributes related    to the fruit have shown the hightest variability in these    collections. According to this scenario, it is necessary to    continue with the evaluation and characterization of <i>P.    peruviana</i> germplasm especially from Andean zones that    have not been evaluated yet, with the aim of establishing    levels of genetic diversity and strategies for conservation    and handling of this germplasm in breeding programs.    In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate    agronomical traits in materials of cape gooseberry    from poorly explored geographic areas of the central and    north-eastern Andes of Colombia in order to contribute    to the knowledge of this valuable genetic resource and    thus encourage its conservation and use in future breeding    programs.</p>     <p><font size="3"><b>Materials and methods</b></font> </p>     <p><b>Evaluated accessions </b></p>     <p>The present study evaluated 54 accessions preserved as    seeds in the germplasm bank of <i>P. peruviana</i> at the Faculty    of Agronomy of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia in    Bogot&aacute; (<a href="#t1">Tab. 1</a>). Among these materials, there are 21 feral    accessions (of spontaneous appearance, small leaves, strong    serosity, short internodes and abundance of trichomes), 19    cultivated accessions (from crop fields and markets with big    leaves, weak serosity, long internodes and lower abundance    of trichomes) and 14 undetermined accessions (plants of spontaneous appearance that cannot be allocated to one of    the two previous categories) collected in the departments    of Cundinamarca (21 accessions), Boyac&aacute; (13), Santander    (5) and Norte de Santander (15).</p>       <p>    <center><a name="t1"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03t1.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p><b>Geographic location and conditions of the experiment</b></p>     <p>As described by Herrera <i>et al</i>. (2011), the evaluation process    was carried out under plastic greenhouse conditions at the    Universidad Nacional de Colombia in Bogot&aacute;, located at    2,556 m a.s.l. and at the geographic coordinates 4&deg;38'08.46&quot;    N and 74&deg;0.5'11.99&quot; W. The temperature and relative humidity,    as averaged maximums and minimums, were 37.5&deg;C    and 87.0%, and 9.7&deg;C and 20.0%, respectively. The soil used    in the experiment was loamy, with a pH of 5.7, an average    organic matter content of 6.17%, cation-exchange capacity    of 17.9 cmol kg<sup>-1</sup> and high levels of phosphorus (&gt;116 mg  kg<sup>-1</sup>) and potassium (1.04 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Experimental design and agronomic management</b></p>     <p>We initially measured the germination percentage (GP) of    30 seeds per accession (from the fruit samples collected in    the field). Initial transplanting was performed 50 days after    sowing (das) in black plastic bags (1 L) with a mixture of    sieved soil, organic matter and sand (vol% 3:1:1). For the    final transplant in the greenhouse at 170 das, four replicates    per accession, for a total of 216 plants in the experiment,    were planted at a distance of 2 x 2 m with a completely    randomized distribution.</p>     <p>Agronomic management activities used during the trial    were conducted under the commercial growing conditions    typical of the Cundinamarca-Boyac&aacute; region. Formative    pruning was practiced once, leaving one main stem from    which reproductive shoots developed. Branches were hung    up on a &quot;V&quot; espalier system. During the study, fertilizer was    applied using a system comprised of a fertilization module    via a Venturi Mazzei Injector-484 and drip irrigation (one    drip line per bed with an auto offset of 1.3 L h-1, spaced    at 45 cm with a run time of 5-20 min d-1, based on plant    development). The nutritional composition of the fertilizer    was as follows: N (total) 15%, P2O5 5%, K2O 30%, MgO 2%,    B 0.02%, Cu 0.005%, Fe 0.07%, Mn 0.03% and Zn 0.01%.</p>     <p><b>Evaluated variables and methodology </b></p>     <p>The agronomical variables were selected according to the    reports of Arbel&aacute;ez and Mora (1990), Lagos (2006) and    Bonilla <i>et al</i>. (2008), and were related to yield and fruit    quality. A total of 23 quantitative (<a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a>) and seven qualitative    variables (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>) were studied.</p>       <p>    <center><a name="t2"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03t2.jpg"></a></center></p>       <p>    <center><a name="t3"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03t3.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>At 290 das, fruit harvest began at the optimal harvest time,    i.e. at the time when the ripe fruit becomes visible through    the husk. With a two-week sampling method over a period    of 4 months (at the end of which production peaks) and    with a sample size of 20 fruits per accession, we evaluated    physical fruit variables such as size (using a digital DC-515    calibrator), volume (water displacement method), fresh and    dry weight (measured with a Precise BJ 4100 electronic    scale, accuracy &plusmn;0.0005 g), firmness (Wagner Fruit Test    FT Series penetrometer), percentage of cracked fruits and    yield. The chemical variables evaluated were total soluble    solids (measured with a Carl Zeiss Jena table refractometer),    percentage of total titratable acidity (assessed by the    potentiometric titration method), maturity index and pH    value with samples taken at 105 d after harvest was initiated.    Variables such as stem length and node number below the    first flower, internode length in the first, second and third    order branches (second internode in each branch), and    serosity (on shoots and leaves) were evaluated at the end    of the study. At the same time, a qualitative record on the    presence of pests (such as <i>Epitrix</i> sp. and <i>Copitarsia</i> sp.)    and diseases (<i>Phoma</i> sp.) was also taken.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Statistic analysis of data </b></p>     <p>The analysis started with the calculation of measures of    central tendency. The quantitative descriptors were studied    by means of a principal component analysis (PCA).    Four of the quantitative variables (size and shape of fruit,    stem length below first flower and internode length in    first order branches) were transformed into categorical    variables according to former studies (Bonilla <i>et al</i>., 2008;    Arbel&aacute;ez and Mora, 1990), and these, together with the    other qualitative variables, were subjected to a multiple    correspondence analysis (MCA), applying the criterion of    Benzecri for the selection of the number of representative    axes. Each description simultaneously involved an analysis    of hierarchical classification using the Euclidean distance    for PCA and the chi squared distance for MCA; the Ward    method was applied as a procedure of agglomeration. The    statistical analyses were carried out using the program R    (2.9.0) of free distribution (R Development Core Team,    2010).</p>     <p><font size="3"><b>Results and discussion</b></font> </p>     <p><b>Descriptive analysis of the evaluated variables</b>        In order to describe the general behavior of the accessions    in relation to each variable, a basic descriptive analysis for    the quantitative (<a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a>) and qualitative variables (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>)  was carried out. </p>     <p>The variables related to fruit traits (TSS, TTA, FWC and    Y) showed average values contained within the standard    values of the Icontec 4580 normative (Icontec, 1999). On    the other hand, fruit cracking was the most variable trait    between accessions, possibly due to sensibility of this trait    to changes in ecophysiological factors (Trillos <i>et al</i>., 2008)    such as soil humidity, relative air humidity and air temperature    (Fischer, 2005). Cracking was more frequent during    the first harvests as well as in advanced fruit ripening    stages (later than stage 4 of the Icontec norm) (Gordillo <i>et al</i>., 2004). The high variability observed in yield, similar to    the findings of Lagos (2006), could be explained by the dependency    between yield and other variables such as length    and number of internodes in productive shoots (with fruit    at each node), variables that themselves also showed large    variation coefficients. </p>     <p>With regard to fruit size, 80% of the collection presented    fruit larger than 20 mm, an outstanding size taking into    account that the typical size for the Colombian ecotype is    around 18.5 mm (Fischer <i>et al</i>., 2007). Around 64% of the    collection had fruits that can be classified as round and    21% as flattened, according to the classification used by    Bonilla <i>et al</i>. (2008). </p>     <p><a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a> shows the accession 06Uch0049, which was characterized    by having strong serosity, potentially associated    with the absence of damage, as it was also observed in four  additional accessions. </p>       <p>    <center><a name="f1"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03f1.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p><b>Principal component analysis </b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The first four axes retained 70.19% of the total variance.    The first component explained 39.79% of the total variance    and the variables related to physical aspects of the fruit as    weight, volume and diameter (FWC, FW, DWC, DW, V,    EDC, and PDC) were the ones that positively contributed    the most to this component, whereas the variables pH and    maturity (MI) contributed negatively. The second component    explained 12.63% of the total variance, with positive    contributions from variables such as maturity, pH, total    soluble solids content (TSS), fruit cracking (CF) and internode    length in first order branches (IL1), and with negative    contributions from variables such as acidity (TTA) and    firmness (F). The third component accounted for 9.39% of    the total variance and allowed us to distinguish materials    of poor performance that showed a small number of fruits    per plant, fruits of light weight and elongated shape, and    tall plants with long internodes in the branches. The fourth    component retained 8.41% of the total variance and was    associated with materials of high performance that showed    a large number of fruits per plant and globosely shaped    fruits. <a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a> shows in detail the contribution of each of the    quantitative variables to the first four components.      According to the hierarchical classification analysis, the    collection could be grouped into two classes. Class 1    grouped 33% of the accessions on the basis of the variables    pH and MI, while class 2 grouped the rest of accessions    based on the remaining quantitative variables (<a href="#f2">Fig. 2</a>). Tab.    1 shows the class to which each accession belongs according    to the PCA. With respect to the collection situation of each    accession (feral, cultivated or undetermined), 64% of the    undetermined materials were grouped into class 1, while    94.37% of the cultivated materials were grouped into class 2    (<a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>). Almost all the commercial materials, characterized    by increased fruit weight with calyx (FWC) and increased    fruit size (Si), were clustered into class 2. Interestingly, there    is a difference of more than 1 g in the FWC between the    two classes (<a href="#t4">Tab. 4</a>). These results are in agreement with    those reported by Ligarreto <i>et al</i>. (2005), where the fruit    size was the second most discriminating variable, and with    the studies of Bonilla <i>et al</i>. (2008) and Hejeile and Ibarra    (2001), who found that quantitative variables related to the    fruit (weight, size and TSS) had the highest contribution to    the variability observed in <i>P. peruviana</i>. </p>       <p>    <center><a name="f2"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03f2.jpg"></a></center></p>       <p>    <center><a name="f3"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03f3.jpg"></a></center></p>       <p>    <center><a name="t4"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03t4.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>Importantly, class 1 showed small values for the variables    TSS, TTA, Si and FWC and was characterized by a higher    degree of ripening and pH in the fruits. During ripening    of fleshy fruits, changes in chemical composition, texture,    and respiration rate are common (Kader, 1992). Among the    most common changes observed during ripening in the    cape gooseberry, Novoa <i>et al</i>. (2006) reported an increase    in TSS and pH and a decrease in TTA. However in our case,    the higher degree of ripening shown by class 1 had no apparent    relation to the degree of fruit firmness (Herrera <i>et al</i>., 2011), an indicator of the degree of maturity commonly    used for the cape gooseberry (Ciro and Osorio, 2007). This    suggests a differential behavior of the metabolic processes    associated with maturation between feral/undetermined    plant materials (predominant in class 1) and cultivated    materials (predominant in class 2), given the low variation    observed in the firmness variable for the whole collection    (Herrera <i>et al</i>., 2011) (<a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a>). </p>     <p>Additionally, in tomato, a longer ripening time has been    observed in fruits from wild materials compared to fruits    from commercial crops, which could be explained by    an apparent adaptive strategy consisting of a lower and    prolonged respiration rate, allowing maintenance of the    organoleptic properties (Pratta <i>et al</i>., 2000). This could explain    in part the behavior observed in class 1. In contrast,    using the maturity index as an indicator of the flavor of    the fruit (Rodriguez <i>et al</i>., 2006), we can see that fruits    from class 1 were less acidic due to a relatively lower concentration    of TTA (and higher MI), but also slightly less    sweet (low values of TSS), compared to fruits from class    2. This hightlights the presence of wild traits among class    1 plants (mostly feral and undetermined), particularly    among those classified as undetermined (<a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>). Cape    gooseberry fruits are originally characterized by a slightly    acidic taste (bitter) (National Research Council, 1989). </p>     <p><b>Multiple Correspondence Analysis </b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The first three axes of the MCA retained 48.48% of total    variation. The variables with the highest contribution to the    first axis, which held 20.51% of the variability, were absence    of damage caused by <i>Phoma</i> sp. (25.68%), strong serosity    (14.26%) and medium fruit size (15-20 mm) (11.34%). For    the second axis, which retained 15.44% of the variability,    the variables with the highest contribution were medium    length of internodes (5-7cm) (17.79%) and strong and    moderate serosity (17.52% and 19.42%, respectively). The    third axis retained 12.53% of the variability and was characterized    by presence of damage caused by <i>Copitarsia</i> sp.    and <i>Epitrix</i> sp. (15.51%), damage caused by <i>Phoma</i> sp. in    the secondary and tertiary shoots (13.85%) and stem length    below the first flower (&gt;40 cm) (12.14%). </p>     <p>The hierarchical classification analysis grouped the accessions    into four classes (<a href="#f4">Fig. 4</a>), with around 83.33% of the    accessions clustered in the first class (A), characterized    by long internodes (&gt;7 cm), absence of serosity, large fruit    size (&gt;20 mm) and presence of damage caused by <i>Phoma</i>    sp. in the tertiary shoots (in 44% of the plant materials).    The second class (B) was comprised of the accessions    06Uch0006, 06Uch0029, 06Uch0031, 06Uch0049 and    06Uch0059 (9.26%), which showed strong serosity and    absence of damage caused by <i>Phoma</i> sp. Class C contained    the accessions 06Uch0011, 06Uch0045 and 06Uch0061,    defined by medium internode length, medium-sized    fruits and moderate serosity. The accession 06Uch0057    was grouped independently in class D and showed severe    damage caused by <i>Copitarsia</i> sp. and <i>Epitrix</i> sp. Tab. 1    shows the classification of each accession in classes according    to the MCA, and the cluster description of the    categorical variables can be seen in <a href="#t5">Tab. 5</a>. </p>       <p>    <center><a name="f4"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03f4.jpg"></a></center></p>       <p>    <center><a name="t5"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03t5.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>The results confirm the discriminating power of the weight    and size of the fruit in the variability of the species as observed in class A, which grouped all the commercial materials    (<a href="#f5">Fig. 5</a>). Thus, it can be concluded that the variables    related to the size and shape of the fruit were important in    the hierarchical classification of the categorical and continuous    variables, thus validating previous observations    from germplasm evaluations carried out on <i>P. peruviana</i>    (Hejeile and Ibarra, 2001; Ligarreto <i>et al</i>., 2005; Bonilla <i>et al</i>., 2008; Madri&ntilde;an, 2010). </p>       <p>    <center><a name="f5"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v30n1/v30n1a03f5.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>Bonilla <i>et al</i>. (2008) obtained similar results to those    observed here, especially the contribution of serosity as a    discriminating factor in the second component; a fact that    is important because this variable is related to the sanitary    state of the plant, as clearly observed in class B (absence of    damage and strong serosity).      With regards to geographic origin, it seems there is not a    clear clustering pattern, a result similar to what was found    by Trillos <i>et al</i>. (2008) and Lagos (2006) for the central Andean genetic group from the department of Nari&ntilde;o. The    absence of geographic structuring might be a consequence    of the high economical and commercial activity of the cape    gooseberry in the Andean region and its wide dispersion    in this part of the country.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3"><b>Conclusions </b></font></p>     <p>In the principal component analysis, descriptors such    as the total titratable acidity and the weight and size of    the fruits were informative in the first two components,    explaining 52.42% of the total variability of the collection    and grouping the accessions into two classes. In the    multiple correspondence analysis, the descriptor related to    serosity was decisive in the classification of one category of    materials, which also grouped together due to their lack of    pest damage in the field; so further studies related to such    prominent features in these accessions are recommended.    In summary, the assessment of the collection by applying    multivariate statistical tools facilitated the documentation    and identification of variability between accessions,    the grouping of accessions based on the set of evaluated    descriptors and the establishment of a rich base of genetic    resources characterized for this species, which will be use-   ful in future breeding programs. </p>     <p><b>Acknowledgements</b> </p>     <p>The authors acknowledge the funding provided by the    International Foundation for Science (IFS Grant C/3860)    and the Direcci&oacute;n de Investigaciones of the Universidad    Nacional de Colombia, in Bogot&aacute; (DIB project code 5529).    We also appreciate the support of Juli&aacute;n David Ortiz in the    analysis of some of the data presented here.</p>     <p><font size="3"><b>Literature cited</b></font> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Arbel&aacute;ez, C.A. and M.A. Mora. 1990. Caracterizaci&oacute;n fenot&iacute;pica    de uchuva (<i>Physalis</i> sp.). Undergraduate thesis. Department    of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellin,    Colombia.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000078&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Bonilla, M. L., K. Espinosa, A.M. Posso, H.D. V&aacute;squez, and J.E.    Mu&ntilde;oz. 2008. Caracterizaci&oacute;n morfol&oacute;gica de 24 accesiones de    uchuva del banco de germoplasma de la Universidad Nacional    de Colombia Sede Palmira. Acta Agron. 57(2), 101-108.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000080&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Br&uuml;cher, H. 1989. Useful plants of neotropical origin and their world    relatives. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000082&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Ciro, H. and J. Osorio, 2007. Avance experimental de la ingenier&iacute;a    de postcosecha de frutas colombianas: Resistencia mec&aacute;nica    para de frutos de uchuva (<i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L.). Dyna Rev.    Fac. Nac. Minas 75(154), 39-46.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000084&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fischer, G. 1995. Effect of root-zone temperature and tropical altitude    on the growth, development and fruit quality of cape    gooseberry (<i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L.). Ph.D. thesis. Humboldt-   University of Berlin, Berlin.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000086&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fischer, G. 2005. El problema del rajado del fruto de uchuva y su    posible control. pp. 55-82. In: Fischer, G., D. Miranda, W. Piedrahita,    and J. Romero (eds.). Avances en cultivo, postcosecha y    exportaci&oacute;n de la uchuva (<i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L.) en Colombia.    Unibiblos, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000088&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fischer, G., G. Ebert, and P. L&uuml;dders. 2007. Production, seeds and    carbohydrate contents of cape gooseberry (<i>Physalis  peruviana</i>    L.) fruits grown at two contrasting Colombian altitudes. J.    Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 81(1), 29-35.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000090&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Gordillo, O., G. Fischer, and R. Guerrero. 2004. Efecto del riego y    de la fertilizaci&oacute;n sobre la incidencia del rajado en frutos de    uchuva (<i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L.) en la zona de Silvania (Cundinamarca).    Agron. Colomb. 22(1), 53-62.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000092&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Hejeile, R. and A. Ibarra. 2001. Colecci&oacute;n y caracterizaci&oacute;n de recursos    gen&eacute;ticos de uvilla <i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L. Faculty of Agricultural    Sciences, Universidad de Nari&ntilde;o, Pasto, Colombia.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000094&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Herrera M., A.M., J.D. Ortiz A., M.I. Chac&oacute;n S., and G. Fischer. 2011.    Behavior in yield and quality of 54 cape gooseberry (<i>Physalis    peruviana</i> L.) accessions from north-eastern Colombia. Agron.    Colomb. 29(2), 189-196.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000096&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Icontec. 1999. Frutas frescas. Uchuva. Especificaciones. Norma    T&eacute;cnica Colombiana NTC 4580. Instituto Colombiano de    Normas T&eacute;cnicas, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000098&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Hawkes, J.G. 1991. Centros de diversidad gen&eacute;tica vegetal en Latinoam&eacute;rica.    Diversity 7(1-2), 7-9.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000100&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Kader, A. 1992. &Iacute;ndices de madurez, factores de calidad, normalizaci&oacute;n    e inspecci&oacute;n de productos hort&iacute;colas. pp. 49-58. In:    Yahia, E. and C.I. Higuera (eds.). Fisiolog&iacute;a y tecnolog&iacute;a postcosecha    de productos hort&iacute;colas. Centro de Investigaci&oacute;n en    Alimentaci&oacute;n y Desarrollo, Limusa, Mexico DF.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000102&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Lagos, T.C. 2006. Biolog&iacute;a reproductiva, citogen&eacute;tica, diversidad    gen&eacute;tica y heterosis en parentales de uvilla o uchuva <i>Physalis    peruviana</i> L. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences,    Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira, Colombia.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000104&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Ligarreto, G., M. Lobo, and A. Correa. 2005. Recursos gen&eacute;ticos    del g&eacute;nero <i>Physalis</i> en Colombia. pp. 9-27. In: Fischer, G.,    D. Miranda, W. Piedrahita, and J. Romero (eds.). Avances    en cultivo, postcosecha y exportaci&oacute;n de la uchuva (<i>Physalis    peruviana</i> L.) en Colombia. Unibiblos, Universidad Nacional    de Colombia, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000106&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Madri&ntilde;an, C.E. 2010. Caracterizaci&oacute;n morfol&oacute;gica de accesiones de    <i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L.del banco de germoplasma de la Universidad    Nacional de Colombia, sede Palmira. M.Sc. thesis. Faculty of    Agricultural Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia,    Palmira, Colombia.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000108&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>National Research Council. 1989. Lost crops of the Incas. National    Academy Press, Washington DC. pp. 241-251 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000110&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Novoa, R., M. Bojac&aacute;, J.A. Galvis, and G. Fischer. 2006. La madurez    del fruto y el secado del c&aacute;liz influyen en el comportamiento    postcosecha de la uchuva, almacenada a 12&deg;C (<i>Physalis peru-   viana</i> L.). Agron. Colomb. 24(1), 77-86.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000111&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Pratta, G., R. Zorzoli, and L. Picardi. 2000. Interacciones gen&eacute;ticas    entre germoplasma silvestre y cultivado de <i>Lycopersicon</i> spp.    con efectos sobre la calidad del fruto de tomate. Plant Genet.    Res. Newsl. 124, 7-12.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000113&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment.    In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, <a href="http://www.Rproject.org" target="_blank">http://www.Rproject.org</a>; consulted: March, 2012.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000115&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Rodr&iacute;guez, N.C. and M.L. Bueno. 2006. Estudio de la diversidad    citogen&eacute;tica de <i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L. (Solanaceae). Acta Biol.    Colomb. 11(2), 75-85.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000117&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Rodr&iacute;guez, M., H.E. Arjona, and J.A. Galvis. 2006. Maduraci&oacute;n del    fruto de feijoa (<i>Acca sellowiana</i> Berg) en los clones 41 (Quimba)    y 8-4 a temperatura ambiente en condiciones de Bogot&aacute;. Agron.    Colomb. 24(1), 68-76.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000119&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Trillos, O., J. Cotes, C. Medina, M. Arias, and A. Arboleda. 2008.    Caracterizaci&oacute;n morfol&oacute;gica de cuarenta y seis accesiones de    uchuva (<i>Physalis  peruviana</i> L.), en Antioquia (Colombia). Rev.    Bras. Frutic. 30(3), 708-715.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000121&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Vargas, O., M. Mart&iacute;nez, and P. &Aacute;vila A. 2001. Two new species    of <i>Physalis</i> (Solanaceae) endemic to Jaliso, Mexico. Brittonia    53(4), 505-510.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000123&pid=S0120-9965201200010000300024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p></font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arbeláez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mora]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Caracterización fenotípica de uchuva (Physalis sp.)]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bonilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Espinosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Posso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vásquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Caracterización morfológica de 24 accesiones de uchuva del banco de germoplasma de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Agron]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>101-108</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brücher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Useful plants of neotropical origin and their world relatives]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer-Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ciro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Osorio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Avance experimental de la ingeniería de postcosecha de frutas colombianas: Resistencia mecánica para de frutos de uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dyna Rev. Fac. Nac. Minas]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<numero>154</numero>
<issue>154</issue>
<page-range>39-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Effect of root-zone temperature and tropical altitude on the growth, development and fruit quality of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.)]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El problema del rajado del fruto de uchuva y su posible control]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piedrahita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Avances en cultivo, postcosecha y exportación de la uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) en Colombia]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>55-82</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UnibiblosUniversidad Nacional de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ebert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lüdders]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Production, seeds and carbohydrate contents of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits grown at two contrasting Colombian altitudes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>29-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gordillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guerrero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Efecto del riego y de la fertilización sobre la incidencia del rajado en frutos de uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) en la zona de Silvania (Cundinamarca)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agron. Colomb]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>53-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hejeile]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ibarra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Colección y caracterización de recursos genéticos de uvilla Physalis peruviana L]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Pasto ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Nariño]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[A.M]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortiz A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chacón S]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Behavior in yield and quality of 54 cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) accessions from north-eastern Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agron. Colomb]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>189-196</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Icontec</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Frutas frescas. Uchuva. Especificaciones]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Norma Técnica Colombiana NTC 4580. Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hawkes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Centros de diversidad genética vegetal en Latinoamérica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diversity]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>1-2</numero>
<issue>1-2</issue>
<page-range>7-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kader]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Índices de madurez, factores de calidad, normalización e inspección de productos hortícolas]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yahia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Higuera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fisiología y tecnología postcosecha de productos hortícolas]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<page-range>49-58</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Limusa^eMexico DF Mexico DF]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lagos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biología reproductiva, citogenética, diversidad genética y heterosis en parentales de uvilla o uchuva Physalis peruviana L]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ligarreto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lobo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Correa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Recursos genéticos del género Physalis en Colombia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piedrahita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Avances en cultivo, postcosecha y exportación de la uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) en Colombia]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>9-27</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unibiblos, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Madriñan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Caracterización morfológica de accesiones de Physalis peruviana L.del banco de germoplasma de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Palmira]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>National Research Council</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Lost crops of the Incas]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<page-range>241-251</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington DC ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Academy Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Novoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bojacá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galvis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La madurez del fruto y el secado del cáliz influyen en el comportamiento postcosecha de la uchuva, almacenada a 12°C (Physalis peru- viana L.)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agron. Colomb]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>77-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pratta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zorzoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Picardi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Interacciones genéticas entre germoplasma silvestre y cultivado de Lycopersicon spp. con efectos sobre la calidad del fruto de tomate]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Genet. Res. Newsl]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>124</volume>
<page-range>7-12</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>R Development Core Team</collab>
<source><![CDATA[R: A Language and Environment. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bueno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Estudio de la diversidad citogenética de Physalis peruviana L. (Solanaceae)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Biol. Colomb]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>75-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arjona]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galvis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Maduración del fruto de feijoa (Acca sellowiana Berg) en los clones 41 (Quimba) y 8-4 a temperatura ambiente en condiciones de Bogotá]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agron. Colomb]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>68-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trillos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cotes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arboleda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Caracterización morfológica de cuarenta y seis accesiones de uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.), en Antioquia (Colombia)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Bras. Frutic]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>708-715</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ávila A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Two new species of Physalis (Solanaceae) endemic to Jaliso, Mexico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Brittonia]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>505-510</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
