<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-9965</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Agronomía Colombiana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Agron. colomb.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-9965</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-99652014000200009</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n2.43011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of replanting systems on populations of Strategus aloeus (L.) and Rhynchophorus palmarum (L.) associated with the oil palm OxG interspecific hybrid (Elaeis oleifera × Elaeis guineensis) in Southwestern Colombia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Efecto de sistemas de renovación sobre las poblaciones de Strategus aloeus L. y Rhynchophorus palmarum L. asociadas al híbrido interespecífico OxG (Elaeis oleifera × Elaeis guineensis) de palma de aceite en la zona sur occidental colombiana]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ávila]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rodrigo Andrés]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayona]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristhian]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rincón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Álvaro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hernán Mauricio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Corporación Centro de Investigaciones de Palma de Aceite (Cenipalma) Program of Biology and Improvement of the Palma ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Barrancabermeja ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Corporación Centro de Investigaciones de Palma de Aceite (Cenipalma) Program of Agronomy ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Barrancabermeja ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Faculty of Sciences Department of Biology]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>01</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>224</fpage>
<lpage>231</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-99652014000200009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-99652014000200009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-99652014000200009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The oil palm replanting process produces a large amount of organic matter that, as it begins to decompose, becomes a breeding ground for various pests, including Strategus aloeus and Rhynchophorus palmarum. Different crop replanting systems are being used today. The method used depends on the plantation and it is basically associated with the costs involved in the process. However, sometimes too little attention is paid to other issues related to the new crop, such as plant health and agronomic management. This study evaluated the effect of different crop replanting alternatives in relation to two pest populations affecting oil palm plantations. Pest populations of S. aloeus and R. palmarum were assessed and monitored for 27 months using seven replanting methods. It was found that the largest number of individuals of R. palmarum and S. aloeus was associated with the stem felling and stacking method. No individuals of the two pest species were found when the felling and burying method was used. The exposed organic matter method that had the lowest number of individuals of both pest species was the felling, chipping, spreading method.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[El proceso de renovación en el cultivo de palma de aceite genera una gran cantidad de materia orgánica, que al iniciar su descomposición facilita el proceso de reproducción de plagas entre las que se encuentran Strategus aloeus y Rhynchophorus palmarum. En la actualidad se utilizan diferentes sistemas para renovar el cultivo, el método usado depende de la plantación y está asociado básicamente a los costos que genera la labor, sin embargo, en algunas ocasiones no se presta atención a otros aspectos del nuevo cultivo tales como el manejo sanitario o el mismo manejo agronómico. En este trabajo se evaluó el efecto de diferentes alternativas de erradicación (renovación) del cultivo relacionadas con las poblaciones de dos plagas de importancia que afectan las palmas. Se realizó un monitoreo durante 27 meses de las poblaciones de S. aloeus y R. palmarun presentes en un lote con siete métodos de renovación. Se encontró que la mayor cantidad de individuos de R. palmarum estuvieron asociados al método de tumbar y apilar los estípites, igualmente ocurrió con S. aloeus, presentando los valores más altos en el mismo método. No se encontraron individuos de las dos plagas en el método de apilado en canales, y el método con materia orgánica expuesta y con menor cantidad poblacional de ambas plagas fue el método de tumbar picar y esparcir.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[oil crops]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[clearing]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[felling]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[stem]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pests]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[biomass]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[oleaginosas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[erradicación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tumbar]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estípite]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[plagas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[biomasa]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font size="2" face="verdana">     <p><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n2.43011" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n2.43011</a></p>     <p><font size="4">    <center> <b>Effect of replanting systems on populations of <i>Strategus aloeus</i> (L.) and   <i>Rhynchophorus palmarum</i> (L.) associated with the oil palm OxG interspecific   hybrid (<i>Elaeis oleifera</i> &times; <i>Elaeis guineensis</i>) in Southwestern Colombia</b> </center></font></p> &nbsp;     <p>   <font size="3">    <center> <b>Efecto de sistemas de renovaci&oacute;n sobre las poblaciones de <i>Strategus aloeus</i> L. y   <i>Rhynchophorus palmarum</i> L. asociadas al h&iacute;brido interespec&iacute;fico OxG (<i>Elaeis oleifera</i> &times; <i>Elaeis guineensis</i>) de palma de aceite en la zona sur occidental colombiana</b>   </center></font></p> &nbsp;     <p>    <center> <b>Rodrigo Andr&eacute;s &Aacute;vila<sup>1</sup>, Cristhian Bayona<sup>1</sup>, &Aacute;lvaro Rinc&oacute;n<sup>2</sup>, and Hern&aacute;n Mauricio Romero<sup>1,3</sup></b> </center></p>     <p><sup>1</sup> Program of Biology and Improvement of the Palma, Corporaci&oacute;n Centro de Investigaciones de Palma de Aceite (Cenipalma). Barrancabermeja (Colombia). <a href="mailto:hromero@cenipalma.org">hromero@cenipalma.org</a>    <br> <sup>2</sup> Program of Agronomy, Corporaci&oacute;n Centro de Investigaciones de Palma de Aceite (Cenipalma). Barrancabermeja (Colombia).    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> <sup>3</sup> Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogota (Colombia).</p>     <p>Received for publication: 10 April, 2014. Accepted for publication: 30 July, 2014.</p> <hr size="1">    <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p>The oil palm replanting process produces a large amount of   organic matter that, as it begins to decompose, becomes a   breeding ground for various pests, including <i>Strategus aloeus</i> and <i>Rhynchophorus palmarum</i>. Different crop replanting systems   are being used today. The method used depends on the   plantation and it is basically associated with the costs involved   in the process. However, sometimes too little attention is paid   to other issues related to the new crop, such as plant health   and agronomic management. This study evaluated the effect   of different crop replanting alternatives in relation to two pest   populations affecting oil palm plantations. Pest populations of   <i>S. aloeus</i> and <i>R. palmarum</i> were assessed and monitored for   27 months using seven replanting methods. It was found that   the largest number of individuals of <i>R. palmarum</i> and <i>S. aloeus</i> was associated with the stem felling and stacking method. No   individuals of the two pest species were found when the felling   and burying method was used. The exposed organic matter   method that had the lowest number of individuals of both pest species was the felling, chipping, spreading method.</p>     <p><b>Key words:</b> oil crops, clearing, felling, stem, pests, biomass.</p> <hr size="1">    <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>El proceso de renovaci&oacute;n en el cultivo de palma de aceite genera   una gran cantidad de materia org&aacute;nica, que al iniciar su   descomposici&oacute;n facilita el proceso de reproducci&oacute;n de plagas   entre las que se encuentran <i>Strategus aloeus</i> y <i>Rhynchophorus   palmarum</i>. En la actualidad se utilizan diferentes sistemas para   renovar el cultivo, el m&eacute;todo usado depende de la plantaci&oacute;n y   est&aacute; asociado b&aacute;sicamente a los costos que genera la labor, sin   embargo, en algunas ocasiones no se presta atenci&oacute;n a otros   aspectos del nuevo cultivo tales como el manejo sanitario o   el mismo manejo agron&oacute;mico. En este trabajo se evalu&oacute; el   efecto de diferentes alternativas de erradicaci&oacute;n (renovaci&oacute;n)   del cultivo relacionadas con las poblaciones de dos plagas de   importancia que afectan las palmas. Se realiz&oacute; un monitoreo   durante 27 meses de las poblaciones de <i>S. aloeus</i> y <i>R. palmarun</i> presentes en un lote con siete m&eacute;todos de renovaci&oacute;n. Se   encontr&oacute; que la mayor cantidad de individuos de <i>R. palmarum</i> estuvieron asociados al m&eacute;todo de tumbar y apilar los est&iacute;pites,   igualmente ocurri&oacute; con <i>S. aloeus</i>, presentando los valores m&aacute;s   altos en el mismo m&eacute;todo. No se encontraron individuos de las   dos plagas en el m&eacute;todo de apilado en canales, y el m&eacute;todo con   materia org&aacute;nica expuesta y con menor cantidad poblacional de ambas plagas fue el m&eacute;todo de tumbar picar y esparcir.</p>     <p><b>Palabras clave:</b> oleaginosas, erradicaci&oacute;n, tumbar, est&iacute;pite, plagas, biomasa.</p> <hr size="1">&nbsp;       <p>   <font size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p>   Oil palm plantations are replanted for technological, health   and economic reasons. This is very important in order to   improve the agronomic techniques implemented as well   as to facilitate the use of new planting materials. In the   case of the Southwestern region of Colombia, replanting   was necessary because of the outbreak of bud rot disease   in 2006, which affected palms of different ages, leading   to the destruction of over 90% of the area planted with <i>E. guineensis</i> (Mart&iacute;nez and Silva, 2009).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   Therefore, the potential biomass left in the field is very high   as approximately 30,000 ha of oil palms are expected to be   replanted in a short period of time (Quintero, 2010), with a production of about two million tons of decaying biomass.</p>     <p>This is important because this waste poses a risk to new   plantations, as it can become a breeding ground for pests   and diseases. Therefore, it is important to devise strategies   to accelerate the decomposition process to reduce the time   that this waste remains in the field to a minimum, minimizing the impact of pests on new plantations.</p>     <p>   Based on experiences from other countries such as Malaysia,   Liau and Ahmad (1991) reported that poor oil palm   disposal practices created ideal conditions for the proliferation   of the insect pest <i>Oryctes rhinoceros</i> Illiger, causing losses of 40% in the first year of harvest.</p>     <p>   In Colombia, replanting research studies have focused on   its effect on the growth and development of new crops (Ruiz   <i>et al</i>., 2009). This is the first study focused on the effect of   clearing and replanting on the dynamics of insect pests,   which is particularly important because of the plant health   approach. Therefore, this study aimed to learn about the   behavior of pests associated with oil palm cultivation under   different biomass removal and disposal systems to devise   strategies for a comprehensive plant health management program.</p> &nbsp;       <p>   <font size="3"><b>Materials and methods</b></font></p>     <p>   This experiment was conducted in the Southwestern   oil palm-growing area of Colombia, on the Palmeiras   plantation, located in the municipality of Tumaco, in the   department of Nari&ntilde;o. An area of land was selected that   was planted with oil palm <i>E. guineensis</i> in 1981, with 90%   bud rot incidence (BR) as of 2009. Seven clearing systems   were implemented (<a href="#t1">Tab. 1</a>, <a href="#f1">Figs. 1</a>, <a href="#f2">2</a>, <a href="#f3">3</a>, <a href="#f4">4</a>, <a href="#f5">5</a>, <a href="#f6">6</a> and <a href="#f7">7</a>) in plots of approximately 1,400 m<sup>2</sup>.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="t1"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09t1.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="f1"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f1.jpg"></a></center></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="f2"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f2.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="f3"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f3.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="f4"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f4.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="f5"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f5.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="f6"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f6.jpg"></a></center></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="f7"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f7.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>   New palm material (Coari &times; La Me) was planted after the   palms were cleared and OxG interspecific hybrid materials   were disposed; 28 experimental units with 23 palms each were used, distributed in an area of 11 ha.</p>     <p><b> Statistical analysis</b></p>     <p>   The experiment was performed under a completely randomized   design with four replicates, each replicate had 23   plants. To examine the effect of the renovation method and   sampling period, a repeated measures analysis of variance   (ANOVA) was performed using the general linear model   (GLM) procedure. Tukey&#39;s multiple range test was used   to compare differences between the means of a number   of <i>R. palmarum</i> and <i>S. aloeus</i> individuals between the   renovation methods. We used Statistical Analysis with   SAS /STAT&reg; Software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) for all the statistical analyses.</p>     <p><b>   Sampling of <i>S. aloeus</i> and <i>R. palmarum</i> in oil palm residues</b></p>     <p>   Observations were made to assess the impact of the insectpests     <i>R. palmarum</i> and <i>S. aloeus</i> on the new crop as well   as on the waste generated from the clearing process, using   a sampling method developed by the Pests and Diseases   Program of Cenipalma, taking into account the insects&#39; eating habits and life cycle.</p>     <p><b> <i>Sampling method for</i> S. aloeus</b></p>     <p>   In the case of <i>S. aloeus</i>, the assessments started 8   months after implementing the different clearing methods,   with a frequency of three months. The method implemented   (Ulloa <i>et al</i>., 2010) varied depending on how the waste was treated and disposed of, as follows:</p>     <p> <b>No chopping methods:</b> Palm stems were cut with a chainsaw   into 2-m-long sections. These sections were slit open   lengthwise and thoroughly checked for the presence of   larvae, pupae and adults of the insect pests. For method   removal, although little or no waste was left in the field,   the assessment was conducted at the final disposal sites in   order to observe the behavior of the insect pests in areas located far away from the crop field.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> <b>Stem chipping methods:</b> palm stems were chipped into small pieces to assess the presence of insect pests in their various stages of development. Assessments were conducted at the final disposal sites, recording and classifying the different stages of the insect development: larvae were classified into three sizes: small (&lt; 2.0 cm), medium (between 2.1 and 4.0 cm) and large (&gt; 4 cm) This method was also used for the assessment of <i>S. aloeus</i> in the waste produced when using the felling and stacking method, the removal method and felling and burying method. These assessments were performed both in the waste and in the surrounding ground.</p>     <p><b> <i>Sampling methodology for</i> R. palmarum</b></p>     <p>   In the beginning, sampling was done with the help of a   field worker equipped with a chainsaw and a shovel. Palms   were cut down, leaves were cut off and cross-sections were   sawed off at different points of the stem (<a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a>).</p>     <p>    <center><a name="t2"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09t2.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>Petiole bases were cut off at each sampling site and checked   for the presence of different stages of insect development (larvae, pre-pupae, pupae or adults) for <i>R. palmarum</i>.</p>     <p>For the following assessments, in the case of the whole   palms, the number of individuals found at different levels of   the stem (<a href="#f8">Fig. 8</a>) was recorded. For stems cut into sections, the method used was the same as for <i>S. aloeus</i>.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f8"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f8.jpg"></a></center></p> &nbsp;       <p>   <font size="3"><b>Results and discussion</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b> <i>Rhynchophorus palmarum</i> in residues</b></p>     <p>   In the initial sampling for <i>R. palmarum</i>, we found significant   differences between treatments and over time   (<i>P</i>&le;0.05) in the methods of herbicides and felling and   stacking. Chipping and stacking, and chipping and   spreading treatments showed the presence of insect pests   at different stages of development during the first months   after the clearing (<a href="#f9">Fig. 9</a>). From the seventh month onwards,   no insect pests were found in the waste from the   felling, chipping and stacking, and chipping and spreading   methods, mainly due to the fact that after the sixth   month, residues were partially decomposed and thus not attractive to <i>R. palmarum</i>.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f9"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f9.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>   A large population of adult <i>R. palmarum</i>, 30 in total, was   found in the herbicide method. However, the samplings   made at 12, 14, 21 and 28 months showed no presence of   larvae due to a rapid drying of tissues that stopped their   development. Avenda&ntilde;o <i>et al</i>. (2008) found similar results   when injecting stems with the systemic herbicide monosodium methanearsonate (MSMA).</p>     <p>   The largest number of individuals, 18 in total, was found in   stacking in the first sampling. Although in the subsequent   assessments, there was a decrease in the number of insect   pests in different stages of development; the continuous   presence of the insect pests was evident throughout the   trial (<a href="#f9">Fig. 9</a>). According to Ooi and Heriansyah (2005),   these piles of palms can take up to 2 years to decompose   completely and are attractive to insect-pests due to the decay of the diseased plant material.</p>     <p>   The decline in the number of <i>R. palmarum</i> adults was due   to the gradual decay of plant material which is its food   source. In the first months of sampling, after the palms   were removed, higher populations of larvae were found   which completed their life cycle in the piles of palms,   causing the greatest damage by boring into the stems of standing palms.</p>     <p>   The number of <i>R. palmarum</i> larvae in the first evaluations   of waste produced from chipping and stacking suggests   that this insect pest completes its cycle in decaying   oil palm trees. The other samples did not show the same   trend because these residues were probably not attractive   to this insect pest. According to Aldana <i>et al</i>. (2010), <i>R.   palmarum</i> adults are attracted to the decomposition of oil   palm bud rot infected tissues; it is possible that there was no decomposition of tissues at that time.</p>     <p>   After the first year of assessments, it was found that, in   most of the methods used, the presence of insect pests in   the various stages of development declined probably due   to the decomposition of most of the plant material. This   confirms the report from Aldana <i>et al</i>. (2010), who found   that the insect can reproduce for up to one year after the felling and removal of the material.</p>     <p>   The observations made during the study show that the size   of the stem chips affected the insect&#39;s capacity to colonize   tissues. In the case of <i>R. palmarum</i>, chips of 7 cm or less did   not allow the insect to complete its life cycle within them.   In chips twice as thick (which have a slower decomposition   rate), the insect will have a greater chance to complete its   cycle as it will have more tissue to feed from to complete its cycle and emerge.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   The removal treatment was carried out at the final disposal   site, not in the field where the new crop was growing. These   measurements showed high values in the number of adult   insects in the first months of assessment. High values of   larval density were found, with an average of 7 individuals   in different larval instars from month 6 through month 17,   when the state of decomposition of the material stopped being attractive to the insect pest.</p>     <p>   This information suggests the importance of the final disposal   site when the total removal method is used, whether   by termination of the vegetative cycle or in the event of an   outbreak of disease, to reduce the high risk of producing   a breeding ground for species such as <i>R. palmarum</i> and <i>S. aloeus</i>.</p>     <p>When analyzing the interaction of treatments in different   developmental stages of the pest through a multiple range   test, we found significant differences for the Removal and Stacking treatments.</p>     <p>   In the staking and burying method, no insect pests were   found in the residuals due to the continuous presence of   water. The carbonization treatment showed no presence of   the insect pests as the plant material was transformed into   inorganic compounds due to high temperatures, rendering them no longer attractive to the insect pests.</p> <b>     <p> <i>Strategus aloeus</i> in residues</p> </b>     <p>   The behavior of <i>S. aloeus</i> in the oil palm waste showed   contrasting results for the different methods assessed. As   for the results presented for the pest <i>R. palmarum</i>; we found   significant differences between the treatments and over time (<i>P</i>&le;0.05). In the stacking treatment, the first values recorded were low compared with the number of individuals in larval stages found in month 14 due to the gradual decomposition of the stems over time, which converted into breeding sites for the pest insects.</p>     <p>   In previous studies in the Central oil palm-growing area   of Colombia, it was observed that 85.6% of a population of   1,000 <i>S. aloeus</i> larvae was found inside the stems that were   in contact with the ground (Ahumada <i>et al</i>., 1995). The   place occupied within the stem depended on the degree of   decomposition and high water content as female insects   had a clear preference for depositing their eggs under these   conditions (Ahumada <i>et al</i>., 1995).</p>     <p>   For the Felling, chipping and stacking treatment, the presence   of up to 6 individuals/m<sup>2</sup>, including three in the last   larval instar and one adult, was observed. This trend continued   until month 21 of the sampling. Although, according to Ahumada <i>et al</i>. (1995), since the life cycle of <i>S. aloeus</i> exceeds 300 d, the increasing presence of individuals in   different instars from month 7 onwards and until month 21   was due to the fact that the insect develops within the waste   disposal system and this cycle had not yet been completed   at the time the data were collected as most of the insects   found were in the larval stage.</p>     <p>   The assessment of these two methods confirms the report   from Ahumada <i>et al</i>. (1995), who stated that the degree of   decomposition of the stems is variable and not dependent   on the time when the material was cleared from the field.   However, the way in which the waste is grouped directly   and proportionately affects the rate of decomposition. The   direct contact between waste increases the rate of decomposition;   therefore, more insects will be found when using   the felling, chipping and stacking method, as compared to   the felling and stacking method (<a href="#f10">Fig. 10</a>).</p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><a name="f10"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a09f10.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>   Finally, the results showed that, of the replanting methods   used in this research, the most efficient method to control     <i>S. aloeus</i> and <i>R. palmarun</i> was the stacking and burying   method. It is clear that burying the stems eliminates the   habitat these insects need to develop. However, this method   is expensive and time consuming so it would be recommended   only in the event that insect pests are very hard to   control. On the other hand, taking into account economic   issues, it was found that the most efficient method to control   these two insect pests when organic matter is exposed to the   environment is the felling, chipping and spreading method   as the waste decomposes rapidly due to size.</p>     <p><b>   Acknowledgements</b></p>     <p>   The authors thank the Palmeiras plantation for allowing   us to use its facilities in carrying out this study. This work   was funded by the Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo   Rural and the Oil Palm Development Fund (FFP) managed   by Fedepalma. </p> &nbsp;       <p>   <font size="3"><b>Literature cited</b></font></p>      <!-- ref --><p>   Ahumada F., M.L., H. Calvache G., M.A. Cruz C., and J.E. Luque   Z. 1995. <i>Strategus aloeus</i> (L.) (Cole&oacute;ptera: Scarabaeidae):   biolog&iacute;a y comportamiento en Puerto Wilches (Santander).   Palmas 16, 9-16.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000088&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Aldana, R., J. Aldana, H. Calvache, and P. Franco. 2010. Manual de   plagas de la palma de aceite en Colombia. Cenipalma, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000090&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Avenda&ntilde;o, J.C., E. Caicedo, and E. &Aacute;ngulo. 2008. Experiencias   en el manejo de Metanoarsonato monos&oacute;dico MSMA en erradicaci&oacute;n   de Palma de aceite y su efecto en poblaciones de     <i>Rhynchophorus palmarum</i>. In: VIII Reuni&oacute;n T&eacute;cnica Nacional   de Palma de Aceite. Cenipalma, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000092&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Liau, S.S. and A. Ahmad. 1991. The control of <i>Oryctes rhinoceros</i> by clean clearing and its effect on early yield in palm-to-palm   replants. pp. 396-403. In: Proc. 1991 PIPOC Intl. Palm Oil   Conf. MPOB, Bangi, Malaysia.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000094&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Mart&iacute;nez, G. and A. Silva. 2009. Plan nacional de manejo de la   pudrici&oacute;n del cogollo. Palmas 30, 97-121.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000096&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Ooi, L. and Heriansyah. 2005. Palm pulverisation in sustainable oil   palm replanting. Plant Prod. Sci. 8, 345-348.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000098&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Quintero, J. 2010. Din&aacute;mica de captura de adultos de <i>Rhynchophorus   palmarum</i> L. (Cole&oacute;ptera: Curculionidae) en la red de monitoreo   de la Zona Occidental. Palmas 31, 17-27.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000100&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Ruiz R., R., M.Y. Gonz&aacute;lez G., and H.M. Romero. 2009. Efecto de   sistemas de renovaci&oacute;n en la producci&oacute;n de palma de aceite en   la Zona Norte de Colombia. Palmas 30, 42-52.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000102&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Ulloa P., A.C., O.M. Moya M., A.H. Rinc&oacute;n N., R.C. Aldana de   laTorre, H. Gomes de Oliveira, R. Ruiz, and R. Avila. 2010.   Din&aacute;mica de reproducci&oacute;n de <i>Strategus aloeus</i> bajo diferentes   m&eacute;todos de erradicaci&oacute;n y da&ntilde;o causado en la nueva siembra.   Ceniavences 166, 1-4.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000104&pid=S0120-9965201400020000900009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ahumada F.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calvache G.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cruz C.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luque Z.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Strategus aloeus (L.) (Coleóptera: Scarabaeidae): biología y comportamiento en Puerto Wilches (Santander)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Palmas]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>9-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aldana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aldana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calvache]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Franco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Manual de plagas de la palma de aceite en Colombia]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cenipalma]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Avendaño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caicedo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ángulo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Experiencias en el manejo de Metanoarsonato monosódico MSMA en erradicación de Palma de aceite y su efecto en poblaciones de Rhynchophorus palmarum]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[VIII Reunión Técnica Nacional de Palma de Aceite]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Bogota </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ahmad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The control of Oryctes rhinoceros by clean clearing and its effect on early yield in palm-to-palm replants]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Proc. 1991 PIPOC Intl. Palm Oil Conf.]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Bangi </conf-loc>
<page-range>396-403</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Plan nacional de manejo de la pudrición del cogollo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Palmas]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>97-121</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ooi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heriansyah]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Palm pulverisation in sustainable oil palm replanting]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Prod. Sci.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>345-348</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quintero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Dinámica de captura de adultos de Rhynchophorus palmarum L. (Coleóptera: Curculionidae) en la red de monitoreo de la Zona Occidental]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Palmas]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>17-27</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruiz R.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González G.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Efecto de sistemas de renovación en la producción de palma de aceite en la Zona Norte de Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Palmas]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>42-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ulloa P.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moya M.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rincón N.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aldana de laTorre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gomes de Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Avila]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Dinámica de reproducción de Strategus aloeus bajo diferentes métodos de erradicación y daño causado en la nueva siembra]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ceniavences]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>166</volume>
<page-range>1-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
