<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-9965</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Agronomía Colombiana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Agron. colomb.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-9965</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-99652014000200012</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n2.43988</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Relief parameters and fuzzy logic for land evaluations of mango crops (Mangifera indica L.) in Colombia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Parámetros del relieve y lógica difusa para la evaluación de tierras para los cultivos de mango (Mangifera indica L.) en Colombia]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Munar-Vivas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Oscar Javier]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez M.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis Joel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Asociación de Bananeros de Colombia (Augura) Technical Equipment ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Medellin ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Faculty of Agricultural Sciences Department of Agronomy]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>01</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>238</fpage>
<lpage>245</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-99652014000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-99652014000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-99652014000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The aim of this paper is to illustrate the use of digital elevation models (DEM) to calculate relief parameters and include them in suitability studies of land for mango crops in Colombia. Data from SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) DEMs with 30 meter of spatial resolution and elevation in meters were used to calculate the slope, aspect, curvature, solar radiation, and topographic wetness index for inclusion in a land evaluation study. Fuzzy logic rules were developed and applied to define the degree of suitability by matching land use requirements with land characteristics. When integrated with geographic information systems, DEMs have significant potential for quantitatively defining and characterizing relief and for generating more detailed data to improve land evaluation processes. The Fuzzy logic proved to be a more realistic approach for evaluating the degree of land suitability than traditional bivalent logic, allowing for the use of membership degrees.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[El objetivo de este trabajo es ilustrar el uso de modelos digitales de elevación (DEM) para calcular los parámetros de relieve y utilizarlos en el análisis de la aptitud de la tierra para los cultivos de mango en Colombia. Se utilizaron los datos del DEM SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) con una resolución espacial 30 metros y a partir de la elevación se calculó la pendiente, el aspecto o dirección de la pendiente, la curvatura, la radiación solar y el índice topográfico de humedad que fueron incluidos en un estudio de evaluación de tierras. Se desarrollaron reglas de lógica difusa y se aplicaron para determinar el grado de aptitud con base en cada uno de los requerimientos del cultivo de mango y de las características de la tierra. Los DEM integrados con los sistemas de información geográfica tienen un potencial significativo para definir y caracterizar el relieve de forma cuantitativa y para generar datos más detallados que permitan mejorar el proceso de evaluación de tierras. La lógica difusa demostró ser un enfoque más realista para evaluar el grado de aptitud de la tierra que la lógica bivalente tradicional permitiendo el uso de grados de pertenencia.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[DEM]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[SRTM]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[tropical fruits]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[land evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fuzzy logic]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[DEM]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[SRTM]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[frutas tropicales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[evaluación de tierras]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[lógica difusa]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <font size="2" face="verdana">     <p><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n2.43988" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v32n2.43988</a></p>     <p align="right"><font size="3"><b>SOILS, FERTILIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF WATER</b></font></p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="4">    <center> <b>Relief parameters and fuzzy logic for land evaluations of mango crops (<i>Mangifera indica</i> L.) in Colombia</b> </center></font></p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3">    <center> <b>   Par&aacute;metros del relieve y l&oacute;gica difusa para la evaluaci&oacute;n de tierras para los cultivos de mango (<i>Mangifera indica</i> L.) en Colombia</b> </center></font></p> &nbsp;     <p>       <center> <b>Oscar Javier Munar-Vivas<sup>1</sup> and Luis Joel Mart&iacute;nez M.<sup>2</sup></b> </center></p>     <p><sup>1</sup> Technical Equipment, Asociaci&oacute;n de Bananeros de Colombia (Augura). Medellin (Colombia).    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> <sup>2</sup> Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogota (Colombia). <a href="mailto:ljmartinezm@unal.edu.co">ljmartinezm@unal.edu.co</a></p>     <p>Received for publication: 12 May, 2014. Accepted for publication: 30 July, 2014.</p> <hr size="1">    <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p>The aim of this paper is to illustrate the use of digital elevation   models (DEM) to calculate relief parameters and include them   in suitability studies of land for mango crops in Colombia. Data   from SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) DEMs with   30 meter of spatial resolution and elevation in meters were used   to calculate the slope, aspect, curvature, solar radiation, and   topographic wetness index for inclusion in a land evaluation   study. Fuzzy logic rules were developed and applied to define   the degree of suitability by matching land use requirements   with land characteristics. When integrated with geographic   information systems, DEMs have significant potential for quantitatively   defining and characterizing relief and for generating   more detailed data to improve land evaluation processes. The   Fuzzy logic proved to be a more realistic approach for evaluating   the degree of land suitability than traditional bivalent logic, allowing for the use of membership degrees.</p>     <p><b>Key words:</b> DEM, SRTM , tropical fruits, land evaluation, fuzzy logic.</p> <hr size="1">    <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>El objetivo de este trabajo es ilustrar el uso de modelos digitales   de elevaci&oacute;n (DEM) para calcular los par&aacute;metros de relieve y   utilizarlos en el an&aacute;lisis de la aptitud de la tierra para los cultivos   de mango en Colombia. Se utilizaron los datos del DEM   SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) con una resoluci&oacute;n   espacial 30 metros y a partir de la elevaci&oacute;n se calcul&oacute; la pendiente,   el aspecto o direcci&oacute;n de la pendiente, la curvatura, la   radiaci&oacute;n solar y el &iacute;ndice topogr&aacute;fico de humedad que fueron   incluidos en un estudio de evaluaci&oacute;n de tierras. Se desarrollaron   reglas de l&oacute;gica difusa y se aplicaron para determinar el   grado de aptitud con base en cada uno de los requerimientos del   cultivo de mango y de las caracter&iacute;sticas de la tierra. Los DEM   integrados con los sistemas de informaci&oacute;n geogr&aacute;fica tienen   un potencial significativo para definir y caracterizar el relieve   de forma cuantitativa y para generar datos m&aacute;s detallados que   permitan mejorar el proceso de evaluaci&oacute;n de tierras. La l&oacute;gica   difusa demostr&oacute; ser un enfoque m&aacute;s realista para evaluar el   grado de aptitud de la tierra que la l&oacute;gica bivalente tradicional permitiendo el uso de grados de pertenencia.</p>     <p><b>Palabras clave:</b> DEM, SRTM , frutas tropicales, evaluaci&oacute;n de tierras, l&oacute;gica difusa.</p> <hr size="1">&nbsp;       <p>   <font size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p>   The occupation of much of the rural Colombian territories   is done without considering the specific characteristics of   the land, resulting in incompatibility between the current   land use and the suitability of the land. The improper location   of land use results in lower productivity, generating   processes of land degradation and, consequently, decreasing   the sustainability and competitiveness of the land use   systems. In recent years, actions have been undertaken   to guide land occupation according to its limitations and   potentials. To achieve this goal, politics, standards and   methods for land evaluation are being implemented for   appropriate land use planning (UPRA, 2013).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The primary objective of land evaluation is the improvement   and sustainable management of land for the benefit   of people. It may be used for many purposes, ranging from   land use planning to exploration of the potential for specific   land use or the need for improved land management or land   degradation control (FAO, 1976). Although relief is one of   the main factors affecting spatial patterns of plant growth   and yields (Austin, 2002; Valbuena <i>et al</i>., 2008; Mu&ntilde;oz   and Kravchenko, 2012), it is usually not included as part   of the land evaluation process because of the difficulty of characterizing and modeling it.</p>     <p>   Bing and Farrell (2004) stated that topography can have a significant influence on crop yield; thus, a better understanding of the effects of topographical parameters on crop yield is important, especially for site-specific soil management. These authors found significant correlations between grain wheat yield and surface curvature, slope length and wetness index.</p>     <p>   A digital elevation model (DEM) represents a regular array   of elevation points (Chang, 2013). DEMs are considered   important sources of data for generating edaphic and relief   information (Pachepsky <i>et al</i>., 2001; McBratney <i>et al</i>.,   2003), and are useful for the analysis of problems of use,   management, and conservation of lands. The whole process   of land evaluation includes biophysical, environmental,   social and economic criteria to identify land suitability   (FAO, 2007; UPRA, 2013). This study aimed to determine   the usefulness of DEMs as a data source for the inclusion   of relief as part of the land evaluation for the cultivation   of mango (<i>Mangifera indica</i> L.).</p>     <p>   Fuzzy logic, as proposed by Zadeh (1965), is a mathematical   method to analyze and represent processes and objects that   are not clearly defined and has achieved a wide range of   applications in electronics, control systems and mechanical   operations. Its use has been extended to the modeling   of natural phenomena and processes whose characterization,   delineation and classification have a high degree of   uncertainty, as in the case of natural resources. Several   studies (McBratney and Odeh, 1997) have concluded that   fuzzy logic improves traditional land evaluation, which is   based on classical logic, since it is a complex problem of an   inaccurate nature, with considerable uncertainty inherent   to the data. Besides, subjective-criteria treatment is usually   performed on spatial units that have large variability   within them. There have been applications of fuzzy logic   in various topics of soils (McBratney and Odeh, 1997), agricultural   land suitability (Ahamed <i>et al</i>., 2000), and land   quality modeling (Mart&iacute;nez, 2006; Ramos and Mart&iacute;nez,   2006; Mart&iacute;nez <i>et al</i>., 2009; Mart&iacute;nez and Munar, 2010).</p> &nbsp;       <p>   <font size="3"><b>Materials and methods</b></font></p>     <p>   The conceptual approach used to evaluate the suitability   of the land was based on a comparative analysis of the   characteristics of the land and the requirements for each   crop needed for adequate yield (Mart&iacute;nez, 2006). The   classification was performed by comparing the specific   requirements of the crops with land characteristics to assess   the level of fitness and establish the boundaries between   suitable and unsuitable conditions for specific uses (FAO,   2007). This involves establishing the requirements of the   types of uses that will be evaluated and identifying, defining   and characterizing the spatial units or land units that will   be evaluated.</p>     <p>   The study area contained 20,898 ha and was located in the   central part of Colombia, in the department of Cundinamarca;   between the coordinates 74&deg;35&#39;0&#39;&#39; and 74&deg;25&#39;0&#39;&#39; W;   4&deg;40&#39;0&#39;&#39; and 4&deg;30&#39;0&#39;&#39; N. The area is considered to have potential   for the production of mango. A SRTM   (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) system DEM with 30   m spatial resolution was used to calculate the slope, aspect,   curvature, solar radiation, and topographic wetness index.</p>     <p>   The information on fertility and other soil properties was   taken from a soil survey at a scale of 1:100,000 (IGAC,   2000); the crop requirements were defined based on literature   review and expert knowledge. The degree of fitness   was determined by several criteria through fuzzy logic   functions, establishing membership degrees (McBratney   and Odeh, 1997). In a preliminary stage, the analyses were   carried out to obtain each of the indicators, separately;   generating a map that shows the status of each indicator   for the entire study area. For each of the identified requirements,   a fuzzy logic function was established that related   them to the characteristics of the land.</p>     <p><b>   Altitude</b></p>     <p>   Elevation is the primary data given by DEMs. The fuzzy   logic function (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>) was used to qualify the degree of   suitability of the slope; optimum elevation values were   taken from 0 to 400 m a.s.l. (degree of membership = 1) and,   from this value, suitability decreased as a function (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>)   until 940 m, an elevation that was considered unsuitable   (degree of membership near 0).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="f1"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f1.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>   Slope   Slope is defined as the tangent of a plane relative to the   surface topography. If we define the elevation (Z) of a point   on a land&#39;s surface as a function of the location (X, Y), then   the slope (S) is the first derivative of a surface and has both   magnitude and direction (Chang, 2013).</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12e1.gif"></center></p>     <p> Because mango is a perennial crop that does not involve   the constant removal of soil and taking into account the   characteristics of distribution and intensity of rain, it is   considered a low risk to erosion. Therefore, it was determined   that a slope that is less than 50% is suitable for the   crop. The valuation of the degree of suitability was done   based on the fuzzy logic function given membership values   as shown in <a href="#f2">Fig. 2</a>.</p>       <p>    <center><a name="f2"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f2.gif"></a></center></p>     <p><b>Curvature</b></p>     <p>   Curvature is a topographic attribute that describes the   convexity or concavity of a terrain&#39;s surface (Romstad   and Etzelm&uuml;ller, 2012). Curvature calculation is based   on second derivatives; the rate of change of a first derivative   such as slope gradient or slope aspect, usually in a   particular direction (Gallant and Wilson, 2000). <a href="#f3">Figure 3</a>   shows the function used to assign membership values for the curvature.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="f3"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f3.gif"></a></center></p>     <p><b> Topographic wetness index</b></p>     <p>   The topographic wetness index is used as an indicator of   water accumulation in an area of landscape where water   is likely to concentrate through runoff (Beven and Kirkby,   1979). The TWI was calculated as a second-order derivative   of the DEM, also known as a compound topographic index   (Quinn <i>et al</i>., 1991) and was calculated with the following equation:</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12e2.gif"></center></p>     <p> Where A is the contribution area (m<sup>2</sup>) of the watershed and <font face="symbol" size="3">b</font> is the local terrain slope angle. In this case, the valuation   of the TWI varied from higher values, which indicate   more suitable areas (<a href="#f4">Fig. 4</a>), to lower values, meaning less suitability.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f4"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f4.gif"></a></center></p>     <p><b> Solar radiation</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   DEMs are an important alternative for estimating the radiation   of areas, and, to this end, calculation algorithms   have been developed as part of the computer programs   of geographic information systems: ArcGIS, SAGA , and   GRASS , among others. For the calculation of radiation   from DEMs, algorithms that consider atmospheric conditions,   elevation, orientation of the surface and the influence of neighboring topography are used (Austin, 2002). <a href="#f5">Figure 5</a> shows the fuzzy function used to assign membership values to the solar radiation.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f5"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f5.gif"></a></center></p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3"><b>Results</b></font></p>     <p> <b>Land unit definition</b></p>     <p>   A topographic profile (<a href="#f6">Fig. 6</a>) facilitates a general view   of the relief of an area, the establishment of the spatial   variability and the definition of the principal land units   present in the study area. It is equally important to identifying   the geomorphologic units that give rise to the land   units. As can be seen, the dominant relief is mountainous,   with steep slopes and small valleys in the lower regions. A   land mapping unit is a mapped area of land with specified   characteristics (FAO, 1976). For the latter purpose, DEMs   play an important role since relief is a forming factor for   soil and, therefore, affects soil characteristics, on the other   hand, relief affects other factors such as radiation, temperature   and soil moisture and, thus, influences the adaptation,   growth and development of plants.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f6"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f6.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>   The information about the topographic position and the   attributes of the terrain in agricultural fields is very useful   for interpreting yield maps. Studies on different crops   show a correlation between yield, soil properties and the   topographic features calculated from DEMs (Kravchenco   and Bullock, 2002).</p>     <p><b>   Altitude</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   In the tropics, altitude is a key factor in studies of zoning   land suitability because it has an inverse relationship   with temperature, thereby influencing crop behavior and   production and the distribution of vegetation. As shown   in <a href="#f7">Fig. 7</a>A, the altitude in the study area varied between   441 and 1,415 m. Although mango production is higher   in low areas, quality is higher at altitudes close to 1,000 m   and areas with higher elevations are considered unsuitable   for the establishment of this crop. In studies by Valbuena   <i>et al</i>. (2008), an inverse relationship between altitude and   mango production was found, further explained by the   spatial variability of the soil properties.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f7"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f7.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>   After applying the fuzzy function to the elevation data,   a map with membership values ranging from 0 to 1 was   obtained; after defuzzification of that map, the assessment   of the suitability degree was obtained (<a href="#f7">Fig. 7</a>B); in this   case, an optimum elevation range was established as 0 to   400 m a.s.l. and, from this value, suitability decreases as a   function (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>) until reaching 940 m, an elevation that is   considered unsuitable.</p>     <p><b>   Slope</b></p>     <p>   <a href="#f8">Figure 8</a>A shows the calculated slope from the DEM.   It varied between 1 and 139%, with the 12-25% range   dominating. Slope is a factor of higher incidence in land   suitability analyses due to its effect on erosion and crop   requirements through mechanization or tillage conditions   and soil workability. Therefore, a reliable estimate of the   slope degree is required as an input for land evaluation   models. This feature is presented in the soil survey map   as a class; however, it represents a rough estimate of what is believed to be the dominant slope in each soil mapping   unit. In the field, the slope was measured and great variation   was found within the soil units, even outside the   boundaries of the provided classes.</p>       <p>    <center><a name="f8"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f8.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>   By comparing the slope calculated from the DEM with that   of the soil map at a scale of 1:100,000 (<a href="#t1">Tab. 1</a>), it was found   that there were important differences in all of the cases.   The 7-12% range, according to the map, occupied 30.8% of the study area, but when calculated from the DEM, it only   corresponded to 8.2% of the area; 12-50% occupied 55.1%   according to the map, while the DEM calculation showed   82.4%; and, for areas with slopes less than 7%, the result   was 12.8% according to the map and 6.1% according to the   DEM. The above results and field verification lead to the   conclusion that DEMs are a source of more reliable data in   the estimation of the slope when compared with soil maps.   This implies an increase in the detail level of the information   obtained and one can make a quantitative estimate   of the slope with greater accuracy in the results; while in   soil studies, generally, one carries out a qualitative rating   of the slope that the person making the study considers   dominant in each map unit.</p>       <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><a name="t1"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12t1.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>   Because the slope is a decisive factor in assessing land   suitability, the previous differences significantly affected   classification; therefore, the use of DEMs improves the   reliability of the process. The SRTM DEM has been considered   a suitable data source for land component mapping   based on slope gradient and aspect (Mashimbye <i>et al</i>., 2014).</p>     <p><a href="#f8">Figure 8</a>B shows the effect of the slope on the suitability of   the land for mango crops after applying the fuzzy function   (<a href="#f2">Fig. 2</a>) to the slope map. Areas with slopes less than 50%,   which occupy the largest extension, have some degree of   suitability, while steeper areas that correspond to escarpments are considered unsuitable.</p>     <p><b> Topographic wetness index (TWI)</b></p>     <p>   TWI is based on a mass balance consideration, where the   total area of the basin is a parameter of tendency to receive   water and the local slope and the length of the drains are   parameters of tendency to remove water. TWI does not   consider the conditions of infiltration and transmissivity.</p>     <p>In the study area, the TWI values ranged from 7.3 to 15.8   (<a href="#f9">Fig. 9</a>A) and it was found that areas with high values for   this index were concave and located in the lower regions and flat terrain with greater water storage capacity; while areas with low values of TWI were convex, with a lower water holding capacity. Higher TWI values indicate areas more suitable than those with lower values (<a href="#f9">Fig. 9</a>B). This parameter is an important component in the assessment of land since, in most of our mountainous agricultural areas, rain is the only source of water for crops. In some studies, it was found that any topographic or soil attribute that contributes to water accumulation in the landscapes, such as upslope length, wetness index, and soil organic matter, was positively correlated to increases in the grain yield of wheat (Chi <i>et al</i>., 2009).</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f9"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f9.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p><b>   Curvature</b></p>     <p>   A positive curvature (<a href="#f10">Fig. 10</a>A) indicates that the surface   is convex, a negative curvature indicates that the surface is   concave and zero values indicate that the slope is uniform   or flat. Curvature allows for the subdivision of land forms   that are represented in the soil map at 1:100,000, and adds   more detail to the map. This is important because concave   shapes are usually associated with areas of accumulation   of materials and, therefore, the soils are deeper and more   fertile, with higher water accumulation and, therefore, a   higher degree of suitability (<a href="#f10">Fig. 10</a>B). Moreover, convex   shapes are areas of erosion, shallow, less fertile and less   capable of retaining moisture, with a lower degree of suitability   (<a href="#f10">Fig. 10</a>B).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="f10"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f10.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>   Surface curvature is an important parameter for land   suitability analysis due to relationships among yield, topography,   and soil moisture content (Timlin <i>et al</i>., 1998).   Some results have shown a clear relationship between   crops yields and surface curvature due to the effect on soil   moisture content. In dry seasons, high yields were found   in the concave areas due to higher moisture availability;   while, in rainy seasons, these areas presented lower yields   (Kravchenko and Bullock, 2002). Sinai <i>et al</i>. (1981) found   a strong correlation between soil moisture content and   surface curvature which in turn affected crop yields.</p>     <p><b>   Solar radiation</b></p>     <p>   <a href="#f11">Figure 11</a>A shows the calculation of radiation from the   DEM. As noted, although the study area was relatively   small, a large spatial variability of radiation was found, with   values between 1,360 and 1,800 kWh m<sup>-2</sup>. Solar radiation,   as calculated with GIS models, represents direct gradients   having physiological effects on plants and is preferable to   indirect gradients; the source of correlation with vegetation   having been identified (Austin, 2002). <a href="#f11">Figure 11</a>B shows   the degree of land suitability according to solar radiation,   indicating some differences in the study area, with further   research it will be possible to understand the effect of this distribution on crop yields. According to Reuter <i>et al</i>.   (2005) little attention has been spent on how the spatial   differentiation of solar radiation can alter crop production   in agricultural fields. Until now, a constant solar radiation is   assumed across a field site, even if terrain conditions affect   the amount of incoming solar radiation.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f11"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f11.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p><b>Land suitability zoning</b></p>     <p>   The final evaluation of land suitability was carried out based   on the following equation proposed by Reynolds (2001), for integration of the evaluated criteria with fuzzy logic.</p>     <p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center> <i>y</i>(t) = min (t) + &#91;mean (t) - min (t)&#93; * &#91;min (t) + 1&#93; / 2 (3)   </center> </p>     <p>   Where: <i>y</i>(t) is the truth value of the node y, min (t) is the   minimum truth value of the antecedents <i>and</i> node, and   mean (t) is a weighted average of the truth values of the   antecedents <i>and</i> node. The equation for calculating the   value is fuzzy and is designed to produce a conservative   estimate of the truth in the presence of negative evidence that is lacking or partial.</p>     <p>   <a href="#f12">Figure 12</a> shows the zoning of the area according to land   suitability for cultivation of mango, defined with four   suitability classes: highly suitable; moderately suitable;   marginally suitable; not suitable. It was found that 25% of   the surface is very suitable, 65% is moderately suitable, 9%   has low suitability and 1% is not suitable for the cultivation of mango.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f12"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v32n2/v32n2a12f12.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>   The use of DEMs has been found to be useful for landscape   prediction models and has shown acceptable accuracy and   good spatial distribution of land suitability classification in arid areas(Al-Shamiri and Ziadat, 2012).</p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3"><b>Conclusion</b></font></p>     <p>   Traditionally, land evaluation does not include relief parameters   for defining the suitability of the land and only   takes into account the degree of slope through a very   rough estimate based on soil survey. Relief parameters are   important criteria to improve the current studies on land   suitability, including new variables that have a significant   effect on crop production. Digital elevation models are an   important source of data for quantitatively characterizing   the relief, calculating several parameters, and increasing the   level of detail and the amount of data useful in the development   of models to support decision-making concerning   the use, management, conservation and reclamation of   land. More research in needed to understand the effect of   relief on crop yields and to identify the best algorithms to calculate relief parameters from DEMs.</p>     <p><b> Acknowledgements</b></p>     <p>   Thanks to the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Divisi&oacute;n de Investigaci&oacute;n (DIB) for financial support of this project.</p> &nbsp;       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   <font size="3"><b>Literature cited</b></font></p>      <!-- ref --><p>   Ahamed, N.R., K. Gopalrao, and J.S.R. Murthy. 2000. GIS-based   fuzzy membership model for crop-land suitability analysis. Agric. Syst. 63, 75-95.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000104&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Al-Shamiri, A. and F.M. Ziadat. 2012. Soil-landscape modeling and   land suitability evaluation: the case of rainwater harvesting   in a dry rangeland environment. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 18, 157-164.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000106&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Austin, M.P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an   interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol. Mod. 157, 101-118.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000108&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Beven, K.J. and M.J. Kirkby. 1979. A physically-based variable   contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24, 43-69.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000110&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Bing, C.S. and R.E. Farrell. 2004. Scale-dependent relationship   between wheat yield and topographic indices. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 68, 577-587.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000112&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Chang, K.-T. 2013. Introduction to geographic information system. 7<sup>th</sup> ed. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000114&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Chi, B.-L., C.-S. Bing, F. Walley, and T. Yates, 2009. Topographic   indices and yield variability in a rolling landscape of Western Canada. Pedosphere 19, 362-370.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000116&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   FAO. 1976. A Framework for land evaluation. Soils Bulletin No. 32. Rome.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000118&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   FAO. 2007. Land evaluation: towards a revised framework. Land and Water Discussion Paper No. 6. Rome.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000120&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Gallant, J.C. and J.P. Wilson. 2000. Primary topographic attributes.   pp. 51-86. In: Wilson, J.P. and J.C. Gallant, (eds.) Terrain   analysis: principles and applications. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, NY .    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000122&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   IGAC, Instituto Geogr&aacute;fico Agust&iacute;n Codazzi. 2000. Estudio de   suelos y zonificaci&oacute;n de tierras de Cundinamarca. Vols. I-III y mapas. Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000124&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Kravchenko, A.N. and D.G. Bullock. 2002. Spatial variability of soy   bean quality data as a function of field topography. I. Spatial data analysis. Crop Sci. 42, 804-815.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000126&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Mart&iacute;nez, L.J. 2006. Modelo para evaluar la calidad de las tierras: caso del cultivo de papa. Agron. Colomb. 24, 96-110.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000128&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Mart&iacute;nez M., L.J. and O.J. Munar V. 2010. Digital elevation models   as data source for land suitability analysis in Colombia. pp. 641-   647. In: Reuter, R. (ed.). Remote sensing for science, education, and natural and cultural heritage. EARSeL, Paris.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000130&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Mart&iacute;nez, L.J., S.A. Garc&iacute;a and R. Sanabria. 2009. Zonificaci&oacute;n de   las especies pasiflor&aacute;ceas comerciales en Colombia. pp. 19-44.   In: Miranda, D., G. Fischer, C. Carranza, S. Magnitskiy, F.   Casierra-Posada, W. Piedrahita, and L.E. Fl&oacute;rez (eds.). Cultivo,   poscosecha y comercializaci&oacute;n de pasifloras en Colombia.   Maracuy&aacute;, granadilla, gulupa y curuba. Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hort&iacute;colas, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000132&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Mashimbye, Z.E., W.P. de Clercq, and A. Van Niekerk. 2014. An   evaluation of digital elevation models (DEMs) for delineating land components. Geoderma 213, 312-319.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000134&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   McBratney, A. and I. Odeh. 1997. Application of fuzzy sets in soil   science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma 77, 85-113.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000136&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   McBratney, A.B., M.L. Mendon&ccedil;a Santos, and B. Minasny. 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117, 3-52.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000138&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Mu&ntilde;oz, J.D. and A. Kravchenko. 2012. Deriving the optimal scaledependent   relationship between wheat yield and topographic   indices for relating topographic attributes and cover crop plant biomass. Geomorphology 179, 197-207.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Pachepsky, Y.A., D.J. Timlin, and W.J. Rawls. 2001. Soil water retention   as related to topographic variables. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 65, 1787-1795.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Quinn, P., K. Beven, P. Chevallier, and O. Planchon. 1991. The prediction   of hillslope paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Proces. 5, 59-79.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Ramos, J.P. and L.J. Mart&iacute;nez. 2006. Aplicaci&oacute;n de la l&oacute;gica difusa   para la calsificaci&oacute;n de aptitud de los suelos para el cultivo de la papa. An&aacute;l. Geogr. 32, 29-40.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Reuter, H.I., K.C. Kersebaum, and O. Wendroth. 2005. Modelling of   solar radiation influenced by topographic shading-evaluation   and application for precision farming. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 30, 143-149.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000148&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Reynolds, K.M. 2001. NetWeaver for EMDS user guide (version   1.1): a knowledge base development system. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GT R-471. US DA, Portland, OR.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000150&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Romstad, B. and B. Etzelm&uuml;ller. 2012. Mean-curvature watersheds:   A simple method for segmentation of a digital elevation model into terrain units. Geomorphology 139-140, 293-302.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000152&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Sinai, G., D. Zaslavsky, and P. Golany. 1981. The effect of soil surface curvature on moisture and yield. Soil Sci. 132, 367-375.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000154&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Timlin, D.J., Y. Pachepsky, V.A. Snyder, and R.B. Bryant. 1998.   Spatial and temporal variability of corn grain yield on a hill slope. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 764-773.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000156&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   UPRA, Unidad de Planificaci&oacute;n Rural Agropecuaria. 2013. Consolidaci&oacute;n   de la metodolog&iacute;a general de evaluaci&oacute;n de tierras   a nivel nacional. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000158&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Valbuena, C., J. Mart&iacute;nez, and R. Giraldo. 2008. Variabilidad espacial   del suelo y su relacion con el rendimiento de mango (<i>Mangifera indica</i> L.). Rev. Bras. Frutic. 30, 1146-1151.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000160&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338-353.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000162&pid=S0120-9965201400020001200030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ahamed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gopalrao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murthy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.S.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[GIS-based fuzzy membership model for crop-land suitability analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agric. Syst.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<page-range>75-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Al-Shamiri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ziadat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil-landscape modeling and land suitability evaluation: the case of rainwater harvesting in a dry rangeland environment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform.]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>157-164</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Austin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecol. Mod.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>157</volume>
<page-range>101-118</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kirkby]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A physically-based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hydrol. Sci. Bull.]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<page-range>43-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farrell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Scale-dependent relationship between wheat yield and topographic indices]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<page-range>577-587</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.-T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introduction to geographic information system]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<edition>7th ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York^eNY NY]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw Hill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.-L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.-S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yates]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Topographic indices and yield variability in a rolling landscape of Western Canada]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pedosphere]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<page-range>362-370</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>FAO</collab>
<source><![CDATA[A Framework for land evaluation]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rome ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>FAO</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Land evaluation: towards a revised framework]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rome ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Primary topographic attributes]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Terrain analysis: principles and applications]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<page-range>51-86</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York^eNY NY]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[John Wiley & Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>IGAC, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Estudio de suelos y zonificación de tierras de Cundinamarca]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>I</volume><volume>III</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kravchenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bullock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Spatial variability of soy bean quality data as a function of field topography. I. Spatial data analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Crop Sci.]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<page-range>804-815</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Modelo para evaluar la calidad de las tierras: caso del cultivo de papa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agron. Colomb.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<page-range>96-110</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez M.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Munar V.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Digital elevation models as data source for land suitability analysis in Colombia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reuter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Remote sensing for science, education, and natural and cultural heritage]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>641- 647</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EARSeL]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanabria]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Zonificación de las especies pasifloráceas comerciales en Colombia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carranza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magnitskiy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casierra-Posada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piedrahita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flórez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cultivo, poscosecha y comercialización de pasifloras en Colombia. Maracuyá, granadilla, gulupa y curuba]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<page-range>19-44</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mashimbye]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Clercq]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Niekerk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An evaluation of digital elevation models (DEMs) for delineating land components]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geoderma]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>213</volume>
<page-range>312-319</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McBratney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odeh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geoderma]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>85-113</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McBratney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendonça Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Minasny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On digital soil mapping]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geoderma]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<page-range>3-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kravchenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Deriving the optimal scaledependent relationship between wheat yield and topographic indices for relating topographic attributes and cover crop plant biomass]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geomorphology]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>179</volume>
<page-range>197-207</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pachepsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Timlin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rawls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Soil water retention as related to topographic variables]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J.]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<page-range>1787-1795</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quinn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chevallier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Planchon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The prediction of hillslope paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hydrol. Proces.]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>59-79</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Aplicación de la lógica difusa para la calsificación de aptitud de los suelos para el cultivo de la papa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anál. Geogr.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>29-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reuter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kersebaum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wendroth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Modelling of solar radiation influenced by topographic shading-evaluation and application for precision farming]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phys. Chem. Earth]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>143-149</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reynolds]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[NetWeaver for EMDS user guide (version 1.1): a knowledge base development system]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Portland^eOR OR]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GT R-471US DA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romstad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Etzelmüller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mean-curvature watersheds: A simple method for segmentation of a digital elevation model into terrain units]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geomorphology]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>139</volume><volume>140</volume>
<page-range>293-302</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sinai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zaslavsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Golany]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effect of soil surface curvature on moisture and yield]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>132</volume>
<page-range>367-375</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Timlin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pachepsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Snyder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bryant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Spatial and temporal variability of corn grain yield on a hill slope]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<page-range>764-773</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>UPRA, Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Consolidación de la metodología general de evaluación de tierras a nivel nacional]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valbuena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giraldo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Variabilidad espacial del suelo y su relacion con el rendimiento de mango (Mangifera indica L.)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Bras. Frutic.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>1146-1151</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zadeh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fuzzy sets]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Information and Control]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>338-353</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
