<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-9965</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Agronomía Colombiana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Agron. colomb.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-9965</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-99652015000100010</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.46747</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Phytosociology of weeds associated with rice crops in the department of Tolima, Colombia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Fitosociología de malezas asociadas al cultivo de arroz en el departamento del Tolima, Colombia]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramírez S.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Javier]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoyos C.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Verónica]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Plaza T.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guido]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Monsanto Latin America North region Weed Management Supervisor ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Mexico DF ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Faculty of Agricultural Sciences Department of Agronomy]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>01</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>64</fpage>
<lpage>73</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-99652015000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-99652015000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-99652015000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Phytosociological studies allow for the characterization and descriptive analysis of weed communities in crops. This study aimed to characterize the weed communities associated with weed crops in the "Centro, Meseta, and Norte" zones of the Tolima Department. The study was conducted in 96 commercial lots, in which a 1 ha area was marked off for the sampling. The development stage, density and cover of the weeds were evaluated. The importance value index, the alpha diversity indices of Shannon-Wiener, Simpson and uniformity as well as the similarity indices of Jaccard, Sorensen and Steinhaus were calculated. For the entire department, 42 weed species were identified, with Echinochloa colona being the principal one in all of the zones. In the Centro zone, 27 species were identified; in the Meseta zone, 31 species were identified; and, in the Norte zone, 38 species were identified. The alpha indices demonstrated that the Meseta zone was the most diverse. The Jaccard and Sorensen indices showed dissimilarity in the weed community for all of the comparisons of the zones. The Steinhaus coefficient registered the highest similarity intensity between the Centro and Norte zones.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Los estudios fitosociológicos permiten caracterizar y hacer análisis descriptivos de las comunidades de malezas de cultivos. Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo caracterizar las poblaciones de malezas asociadas a cultivos de arroz de las zonas Centro, Meseta y Norte del departamento del Tolima. Los levantamientos fueron realizados en 96 lotes comerciales, en cada lote se demarcó un área de evaluación de 1 ha en la cual se realizaron los muestreos. Se evaluó el estado de desarrollo, densidad y cobertura de las malezas. Se calculó el índice de valor de importancia, los índices de diversidad alfa de Shannon-Wiener, Simpson y de uniformidad así como los índices de similitud de Jaccard, Sorensen y Steinhaus. En todo el departamento se identificaron 42 especies de malezas siendo Echinochloa colona, la principal en todas las zonas. En la zona Centro fueron identificadas 27 especies; en la zona Meseta 31 y en la zona Norte 38. Los índices alfa registraron que la zona Meseta fue la más diversa. Los índices Jaccard y Sorensen mostraron disimilitud en la comunidad de malezas en todas las comparaciones de las zonas. El coeficiente Steinhaus registró mayor intensidad de similitud entre las zonas Centro y Norte.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[weed communities]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[importance value index]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[diversity index]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[cereals]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[poblaciones de malezas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[índice de valor de importancia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[índice de diversidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cereales]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="verdana" size="2"> &nbsp;     <p>Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.46747" target="_blank">10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.46747</a></p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="4">    <center> <b>Phytosociology   of weeds associated with rice crops in the department of Tolima, Colombia</b> </center></font></p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3">    <center> <b>Fitosociolog&iacute;a de malezas asociadas al   cultivo de arroz en el departamento del Tolima, Colombia</b> </center></font></p> &nbsp;     <p>    <center> <b>Javier Ram&iacute;rez S.<sup>1</sup>, Ver&oacute;nica Hoyos C.<sup>2</sup>, and Guido   Plaza T.<sup>2</sup></b> </center></p>     <p><sup>1</sup> Weed Management Supervisor, Monsanto Latin America North region. Mexico DF (Mexico). <a href="mailto:javierramirezsuarez@gmail.com">javierramirezsuarez@gmail.com</a>    <br> <sup>2</sup> Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogota (Colombia). </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Received   for publication: 23 October, 2014. Accepted for publication: 30 March, 2015.</p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p>Phytosociological studies allow for the   characterization and descriptive analysis of weed communities in crops. This   study aimed to characterize the weed communities associated with weed crops in   the &quot;Centro, Meseta, and Norte&quot; zones of the Tolima Department.   The study was conducted in 96 commercial lots, in which a 1 ha area was marked   off for the sampling. The development stage, density and cover of the weeds   were evaluated. The importance value index, the alpha diversity indices of   Shannon-Wiener, Simpson and uniformity as well as the similarity indices of Jaccard, Sorensen and Steinhaus were calculated. For the entire department, 42 weed species were identified,   with <i>Echinochloa</i><i> colona</i> being   the principal one in all of the zones. In the Centro zone, 27 species were   identified; in the Meseta zone, 31 species were   identified; and, in the Norte zone, 38 species were identified. The alpha   indices demonstrated that the Meseta zone was the   most diverse. The Jaccard and Sorensen indices showed   dissimilarity in the weed community for all of the comparisons of the zones.   The Steinhaus coefficient registered the highest   similarity intensity between the Centro and Norte zones. </p>     <p><b>Keywords:</b> weed communities, importance value   index, diversity index, cereals. </p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>Los estudios fitosociol&oacute;gicos permiten caracterizar y   hacer an&aacute;lisis descriptivos de las comunidades de malezas de cultivos. Este   trabajo tuvo como objetivo caracterizar las poblaciones de malezas asociadas a   cultivos de arroz de las zonas Centro, Meseta y Norte del departamento del   Tolima. Los levantamientos fueron realizados en 96 lotes comerciales, en cada   lote se demarc&oacute; un &aacute;rea de evaluaci&oacute;n de 1 ha en la cual se realizaron los   muestreos. Se evalu&oacute; el estado de desarrollo, densidad y cobertura de las   malezas. Se calcul&oacute; el &iacute;ndice de valor de importancia, los &iacute;ndices de   diversidad alfa de Shannon-Wiener, Simpson y de uniformidad as&iacute; como los   &iacute;ndices de similitud de Jaccard, Sorensen y Steinhaus. En todo el departamento se identificaron   42 especies de malezas siendo <i>Echinochloa</i><i> colona</i>,   la principal en todas las zonas. En la zona Centro fueron identificadas 27   especies; en la zona Meseta 31 y en la zona Norte 38. Los &iacute;ndices alfa   registraron que la zona Meseta fue la m&aacute;s diversa. Los &iacute;ndices Jaccard y Sorensen mostraron   disimilitud en la comunidad de malezas en todas las comparaciones de las zonas.   El coeficiente Steinhaus registr&oacute; mayor intensidad de similitud entre las zonas Centro y Norte.</p>     <p><b>Palabras   clave:</b> poblaciones de malezas, &iacute;ndice de valor de importancia, &iacute;ndice de diversidad, cereales.</p> <hr size="1"> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p>Agricultural   activities generate changes and filters for biological communities and weeds   that are associated with crops are exposed to disruptive factors that make   their populations dynamic over time (Booth <i>et     al</i>., 2003). In terms of responses to these agents of change, not all   species in an agricultural system are equally important, with differences in   frequency, density, and growth habit making some species the principal ones   that generate economic and secondary effects that normally do not present   problems for yield (Pitelli, 2000). </p>     <p>One of the   more utilized methods for the analysis of weed communities in agricultural   systems is the phytosociological study.   Phytosociology is defined as the science that studies plant communities from the   floristic, ecological, and dynamic points of view or as the science that studies   plant groupings, their interactions, and their dependence on their environment   (Ferriol and Merle, 2006).  </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>A   quantitative phytosociological study of a weed   community in a defined area and time provides a momentary analysis of the plant   composition, providing a tool that supplies various inferences for a plant community   (Erasmo <i>et al</i>.,   2004). The analysis of weed communities can be approached with the description   of their characteristics, employing tools such as similarity and diversity   indices that clarify their performance.</p>     <p>Alpha   diversity (<font face="symbol" size="3">a</font>) in studies on weed populations measures the amount of   diversity within a defined community in a zone (Booth <i>et al</i>., 2003). For weed ecology, the Margalef,   Shannon-Wiener, and Simpson indices are more commonly used. The Margalef index focuses on the richness of the species found   in a studied population. The Shannon-Wiener index is based on the proportional   abundance of each species and the Simpson index is based on the probability   that two individuals in a community sample will be of the same species (Booth <i>et al</i>., 2003). </p>     <p>The study   of the beta diversity (<font face="symbol" size="3">b</font>) in weeds measures the change in weed species   diversity between zones and samples the similarity of the composition of the   community between location pairs through the calculation of similarity indices   (Booth<i> et al</i>., 2003). The Jaccard and Sorensen index and the Steinhaus coefficient are more common in studies on weeds in agricultural systems. The Jaccard and Sorensen indices only consider how many species   are in-common in a pair of evaluated communities and do not take into account   the abundance of each species. For its part, the Steinhaus similarity coefficient or index incorporates abundance data into its analysis,   taking into account the differences that occur in this data, and so is   considered more valuable than the other indices (Booth<i> et al</i>., 2003).     </p>     <p>For its   part, the importance value index (IVI) determines the dominance of the species   and the degree of heterogeneity of the agroecosystem (Pitelli, 2000), allowing for the evaluation of the   horizontal structure of the community through the relative dominances,   abundances, and frequencies (Lamprecht, 1990). The   relative density is the number of individuals of a species or absolute density   of a species over the total number of individuals or total density of all of the   species (Brighenti <i>et al</i>., 2003).  Relative   frequency is defined as the frequency of a species over the sum of the   frequencies of all of the species or the total frequency of all of the species   (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg,   1976). Relative dominance (relative cover) is defined as the absolute dominance   of a species over the dominance of all of the species (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg, 1976) or   as the cover of a species over the total cover of all of the species, expressed   as a percentage (Cantillo <i>et al</i>., 2006).</p>     <p>Based on   the these considerations and considering the evident importance that this type   of study has for the characterization and study of plant communities associated   with commercial crops, the present study was developed with the aim of identifying   the floristic composition and of characterizing the weed populations of   commercial rice crops in the Centro, Meseta, and   Norte zones of the department of Tolima in four evaluations carried out between   emergence and formation of the flower primordia in   the crops. </p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3"><b>Materials   and methods</b></font></p>     <p>The   present study was carried out between July of 2012 and February of 2013 in   commercial crops in the department of Tolima, which were divided into three   production zones in accordance with the different climatic, topographic, edaphical, and irrigation conditions. In each zone, the   municipalities with the larger cultivated areas were used, with 96,319 ha of   cultivated rice per year (Fedearroz, 2008),   distributed as follows: the Norte zone (26% of the area), the Meseta zone of Ibague (21% of the area) and the Centro zone   (53% of the area) with the municipalities of Purificaci&oacute;n, Guamo, Espinal and Salda&ntilde;a (Colombia) (<a href="#t1">Tab. 1</a>). </p>     <p>    <center><a name="t1"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10t1.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>The   sample size was 0.1% (96 ha) of the total area in accordance with the following   equation (Spiegel, 1988): </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10e1.gif"></center></p>     <p>Where,     <br> <i>n</i> = sample size.    <br> <i>N</i> = total of the universal sample (in this case the 96,319 ha   cultivated per year). 1.96<sup>2</sup> with a confidence of 95%.    <br> <i>p</i> = expected proportion (5% = 0.05).    <br> <i>q</i> = 1-p (in this case: 1-0.05 = 0.95).    <br> <i>d</i><sup>2</sup> = precision (in this case 10%).</p>     <p>The number   of hectares sampled per zone and municipality was distributed in proportion to   the stratum, using the cultivated area as the criterion (<a href="#t1">Tab. 1</a>). The   methodology used to distribute the sampling units in the study area resulted in   the sampling of an actual area of 384 ha for the entire study (0.4% of the   total cultivated area in the selected municipalities) and 0.8 ha in each lot. </p>     <p>For the phytosociological study and characterization of the weed   communities, a 0.04 m<sup>2</sup> sampling square was used, which was thrown   randomly five times (5) within the marked off hectare in each lot, following a   zigzag pattern. Each hectare represented a commercial lot in accordance with   reports from Erasmo <i>et al</i>. (2004) and Plaza and Hern&aacute;ndez (2014). Four samples were   conducted during the development of the crop: before the application of the   first post-emergence control method (7 to 22 days after sowing, das), after the   first control method (22-35 das), after the second post-emergence control   method (37-52 das) and once the herbicide applications were finished, during   the flower primordia formation stage of the crop   (52-65 das). In each sampling, the variables of density and cover were measured   for each of the encountered weed species. The species were identified using the   studies conducted by Fuentes <i>et al</i>.   (2006a), Fuentes <i>et al</i>. (2006b) and Montealegre (2011) as references.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The   importance value index (IVI) was calculated under the following parameters for   each species: absolute density (Da), relative density (Dr), absolute frequency   (Fa), relative frequency (Fr), cover (Ca), and   relative cover (Cr), in accordance with Curtis and Mclntosh (1950) and Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1976):</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10e2.gif"></center></p>     <p>Among the   alpha diversity indices (<font face="symbol" size="3">a</font>), the Shannon-Wiener index (<i>H</i>), the Simpson dominance index (<i>D</i>) and the uniformity index (E) were   calculated in accordance with the equations cited by Booth <i>et al</i>. (2003).</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10e3.gif"></center></p>     <p>Where,    <br> <i>p<sub>i</sub></i>= proportional abundance of each   species    <br> <i>n<sub>i</sub></i> = number of individuals per species    <br> <i>N</i> = number of total individuals    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> <i>S </i>= number of total of species richness    <br> <i>H = </i>Shannon-Wiener index</p>     <p>On the   other hand, of the beta diversity indices (<font face="symbol" size="3">b</font>), the similarity indices of Jaccard (<i>S<sub>J</sub></i>)   and Sorensen (S<sub>S</sub>) and the Steinhaus coefficient (S<sub>ST</sub>) were calculated in accordance with the methodology   cited by Booth <i>et al</i>. (2003).</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10e4.gif"></center></p>     <p>Where,    <br> <i>j</i> = number of species found in both communities    <br> <i>a</i> = number of species found only in community <i>a</i>    <br> <i>b</i> = number of species found only in community <i>b</i>    <br> <i>W</i> = Sum of the lower of the two abundances of each species    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> = total of   the abundances of each community</p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3"><b>Results   and discussion</b></font></p>     <p><b>Floristic   composition</b></p>     <p>In the   rice production areas of Tolima, 42 weed species were identified, grouped into   2 classes, 20 families, and 31 genera. In the zones, the Centro zone presented   27 weed species from 14 families and 21 genera; the Meseta zone had 31 species from 12 families and 23 genera; and the Norte zone   contained 38 species from 18 families and 29 genera. In all of the zones, the Poaceae family contributed the highest number of total   species: 9 species in the Centro zone, 12 species in the Meseta zone and 12 species in the Norte zone (<a href="#t2">Tab. 2</a>). </p>     <p>    <center><a name="t2"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10t2.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>The Liliopsida class contributed the highest number of species,   grouped into five (5) families, notably Poaceae and Cyperaceae. The Poaceae family   contributed 13 species to the total number of weed plants in the crop. The Digitaria and Leptochloa genera   contributed the higher numbers of species, with 3 and 2, respectively. These   results coincide with a report made by Erasmo <i>et al</i>. (2004), evidencing the importance   of weed species from the Liliopsida class. Rao <i>et al</i>. (2007)   and Erasmo <i>et     al</i>. (2004) stated that the more damaging species in this region of Colombia   belong to the Poaceae and Cyperacea families. This situation is possibly due to the use of the same cultivation   system for several years and to the phylogenetic relationship between the weeds   and crops as they share the same requirements for resources (Radosevich <i>et al</i>.,   1997; Puentes, 2003; Cobb and Reade, 2010).   Considering these facts as well as the revelations of Inoue <i>et al</i>. (2012), the management of weeds   in the rice crops of the Tolima department must be directed toward this segment   of plants. </p>     <p><b>Importance value index (IVI)</b></p>     <p>The   analysis of the IVI for the entire department demonstrated that 10 species made   up 50% of the maximum importance value index, representing the more damaging   weeds in the rice production systems of the region (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). <i>E. colona</i> was   the most important species in the rice crops of Tolima with an importance value   index (IVI) of 30.4, a presence in 91.7% of the lots of the departments, a   frequency of 0.39 and a density of 77.2 individuals/m<sup>2</sup> (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). The   level of importance of the species was markedly influenced by the relative   frequency, which indicated that it is a species that is adapted to the   prevailing conditions of the crops. The importance of this species has been   reported by different authors (Holm <i>et al</i>.,   1991; Puentes, 2003; Rao <i>et al</i>., 2007; Chauhan and Johnson, 2010a). Erasmo <i>et al</i>. (2004) reported on the importance of this species in weed   communities in rice crops of Brazil through the use of phytosociological indices. </p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><a name="t3"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10t3.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>For   importance, the above species was followed by <i>D. ciliaris</i>, <i>C. iria</i>, <i>I. rugosum</i>and <i>M. nudiflora, </i>which presented IVIs of   17.7, 17.1, 14.3 and 13.2%, respectively. These species together with <i>D. bicornis</i> and <i>P. boscianum</i> offered the higher values of frequency after <i>E. colona</i> (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). The important   presence of these species coincides with findings for rice crops in Colombia   and in different locations in the world and are related to the adaptation of   these species to humid conditions (Erasmo <i>et al</i>., 2004; Rao <i>et al</i>., 2007; Chauhan and Johnson, 2009a; Montealegre, 2011). </p>     <p>Phytosociological indices and parameters, such as the   importance value index (IVI), offer a view of the composition and the   distribution of plant species in a community through ecological evaluation methods   (Concen&ccedil;o <i>et al</i>.,   2013). IVI parameters contemplate the importance of populations within a weed   community that, together with the analysis of the number of individuals and   produced mass, allow for the inference of which species are more important in   terms of infestation (Pitelli, 2000). </p>     <p>In the   Centro zone, six species represented 50% of the maximum importance value index,   representing the principal problem for rice crops in this zone. <i>E. colona</i> was   the most important species with an IVI value of 39.2 (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). It was reported   in 88% of the lots of the zone with a frequency of 0.39 and a density of 62.4   individuals/m<sup>2</sup> (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>), with relative frequency being the most   important variable. <i>R. cochinchinensis</i>, <i>C. iria</i> and <i>I. rugosum</i> presented the higher density values (<a href="#t3">Tab.   3</a>). <i>R. cochinchinensis</i> was the weed with the second highest importance in the Centro zone, with an IVI   of 29.3 and a density of 276.9 individuals/m<sup>2</sup> (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). </p>     <p>In Meseta, the analysis of the zone&#39;s data demonstrated that   10 species made up 50% of the maximum importance value index, where <i>E. colona</i> was   the most important species of the zone with an IVI value of 26.5 (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>), a   presence in 90% of the lots, a frequency of 0.39, and a density of 56.7   individuals/m<sup>2</sup> (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>); again, the relative frequency was the   component with the most influence on this level of importance. <i>C. iria</i>, <i>I. rugosum</i> and <i>D. bicornis</i> had frequency levels of 0.20, 0.16 and 0.18, and IVI values of 18.9, 15.7 and   15.6, respectively (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). The species with the higher densities included <i>L. leptocarpa</i>, <i>H. limosa</i> and <i>C. iria</i> (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). </p>     <p>The IVI in   the Norte zone had 8 species that made up 50% of the maximum index. In this   zone, <i>D. ciliaris </i>was the most important weed with an IVI of 29.7 (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). It was found in   4% of the area with a frequency of 0.002 and a density of 700 individuals/m<sup>2</sup>.   The index for this species was influenced by the relative density by a high   degree (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). <i>S. obtusifolia</i> and <i>C. iria</i> presented density values of 310.94 and 228.70 individuals/m<sup>2</sup> (<a href="#t3">Tab.   3</a>). <i>E. colona</i>was   registered in 100% of the cultivated area in the north, with a frequency of   0.39, a density of 123.60 individuals/m<sup>2</sup> and an IVI of 28.1 (<a href="#t3">Tab.   3</a>). </p>     <p>There was   not a significant difference between the importance indices of <i>E. colona</i> and <i>D. ciliaris</i> due to divergences in the contribution of the components. The absolute density   and the relative density were higher in <i>D. ciliaris</i>; while the absolute frequency and   relative frequency were more important in <i>E. colona</i> (<a href="#t3">Tab. 3</a>). Balduino <i>et al</i>. (2005), in sociological   studies of tree species, suggested that relative density is the parameter that   contributes the most to the importance of relevant species. However, the   results of the present study demonstrated that the relative frequency was   determinant in the importance of the principal species. The level of adaptation   of the species to the ecological conditions of the agricultural environment   determined the frequency of weeds in the lots and the number of individuals   that competed with the crop. </p>     <p>This study   verified that <i>E. colona</i> was the most important species in the rice zones of Tolima. It was the most   frequent weed with an average density of 77 plants/m<sup>2</sup>. Its negative   effect means that it is considered the most problematic weed of the Graminea family in rice crops, with losses due to   competition reported at 76% under densities of 280 plants/m<sup>2</sup> (Mercado and Talatala,   1977). Chauhan and Johnson (2010b) suggested that the   shading effect caused by the aerial part of <i>E. colona</i> could be the principal mechanism   responsible for yield losses. Its level of predominance in rice crops was   highlighted in Colombia and Latin America by Plaza and Hern&aacute;ndez (2014), Fuentes <i>et al</i>. (2010) and Puentes (2003). This indicates that <i>E. colona</i> has the ability to colonize humid environments   where rice crops are developed in the tropics (Puentes,   2003). Adaptive advantages such as a high capacity for production and for the   germination of seeds under humid conditions (Chauhan and Johnson, 2010a, 2009a) and the plant&#39;s metabolizing of C4 (Halvorson and Guertin, 2003; Montealegre, 2011)   facilitate the adaptation and establishment of <i>E. colona</i>populations under the   conditions of the agricultural system in Tolima. The importance of <i>E. colona</i>in   this region, even with the use of herbicides specific for its control, has been   reported by Puentes (2003). </p>     <p><b>Diversity indices</b></p>     <p>Alpha   indices analyze the diversity within a weed community. Taking into account the   Shannon-Wiener (H), Simpson and Uniformity (E) indices, it was possible to   observe that the zones considered in this study were differentiated by their   diversity. The Meseta zone was the most diverse (<a href="#t4">Tab.   4</a>). According to the Shannon-Wiener index, the three evaluated rice zones   presented a low species diversity; however, the Meseta zone possessed a proportionally higher species diversity, with the highest   value at 2.7, followed by the Norte zone with 2.6 and the Centro zone with 2.3   (<a href="#t4">Tab. 4</a>).  For its part, the lowest value   for the Simpson dominance index (0.09) indicated that the weed community in the Meseta zone of Ibague has a low probability of being   dominated by few species; therefore, it was more diverse (<a href="#t4">Tab. 4</a>). For its   part, the high value of the Uniformity index was also seen in this zone (0.8)   (<a href="#t4">Tab. 4</a>), suggesting a high species diversity (Booth <i>et al</i>., 2003). </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="t4"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10t4.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>The   diversity of the Meseta zone possibly presented   itself in response to the fact that the number of individuals of each species   was more balanced within the community (Concen&ccedil;o <i>et al</i>., 2013). In a broad sense, the   Simpson dominance coefficient and uniformity coefficient indicated that the   communities were dominated by various species. This could be the explanation   for the number of applications and the quantity of active ingredients of the   herbicides in use (data not shown) because it is thought that, when a weed   community is more diverse, it tends to require complementary control treatments   and that the weeds require a high quantity of herbicides due to the   differential sensitivity of the species (Kuva <i>et al</i>., 2007).    </p>     <p><b>Similarity indices</b></p>     <p>The beta   diversity indices of Jaccard and Sorensen facilitate   the comparison of areas in terms of composition of the weed communities (Concen&ccedil;o <i>et al</i>.,   2012a). According to Felfili and Venturoli (2000), these indices are considered elevated when they are above 0.5 (50%), at   which a high similarity can be interpreted between areas. Booth <i>et al</i>. (2003) indicated that the values   must be interpreted on a scale of 0 to 1, where 0 indicates total dissimilarity   and 1 indicates absolute similarity.  </p>     <p>The   similarity indices of  Jaccard and Sorensen seen in the present study showed that   the composition was not homogenous, that is, there was dissimilarity for all of   the comparisons carried out between the zones (<a href="#t5">Tab. 5</a>), suggesting   dissimilarity in the composition of the weed communities between the Centro, Meseta, and Norte zones despite the fact that underlying   similarity factors were seen in the zones, such as the nonexistence of crop   rotation and sowing intensification (Erasmo <i>et al</i>., 2004). However, Concen&ccedil;o <i>et al</i>.   (2011) suggested that, in zones where a crop is developed in a continuous   manner or with rotation over a long period of time, there will be disconnection   (dissimilarity). The sampled lots in the department of Tolima have been   cultivated with rice for 60 years and, for the most part, have not been the   subject of a crop rotation plan at any time of the year.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="t5"><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n1/v33n1a10t5.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>The   literature contains results for the Jaccard index   that vary in accordance with the climatic and agronomic management conditions; Hyvonen <i>et al</i>.   (2003) and Fried <i>et al.</i> (2008)   demonstrated homogeneity in weed communities of cereal crops under conditions   of a temperate climate in response to the selection effect of the seasons,   registering values between 0.5 and 0.8. Under tropical conditions, Concen&ccedil;o<i> et al</i>.   (2012a) and Concen&ccedil;o <i>et al</i>. (2013) reported values between 0.2 and 1 due to variations   in management. Ram&iacute;rez (2010), for tobacco crops in   the department of Huila (Colombia), found high values for this coefficient,   close to 1. For the Sorensen index, Concen&ccedil;o <i>et al</i>. (2012b) and Concen&ccedil;o<i> et al</i>. (2011) reported low levels of   0.2 and high levels of 1 for tropical conditions. Furthermore, Erasmo <i>et al</i>.   (2004) reported values between 0.22 and 0.75 in rotated rice crops: the low   value was found when comparing areas of irrigated rice crops without rotation   with areas with a rice-watermelon rotation, while the 0.75 value was found when   comparing areas without rotation to areas with a rice-soy rotation. These   authors noted the importance of the type of applied herbicide, the application   timing, and the abundance of some species.</p>     <p>The low   similarity between the weed communities was possibly due to the differences in   the management of the populations because divergences were seen between the   zones at the time of post-emergence herbicide application, in the application   equipment, in the volumes of utilized water, and in the provenience of the   seeds (data not shown). In this sense, Bernardes <i>et al</i>. (2011) stated that the   dissimilarity of weeds between agricultural areas is explained by differences   in the conditions of the soil, in the weed control methods (mechanical,   cultivation, and chemical) and, mainly, in the utilization of herbicides with   different mechanical actions that contribute to the selection of a more diverse   flora.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The Steinhaus coefficient calculates the similarity of   communities, taking into account differences in the abundance of the species,   making it more precise (Booth <i>et al</i>.,   2003). The results of the Steinhaus index for the   present study registered similarity in all of the zone comparisons because   values above 0.5 were found in all of the cases. The similarity was higher in   the comparison between the Centro and Norte zones, indicating a high quantity   of in-common species with similar levels of abundance (<a href="#t5">Tab. 5</a>). This situation   was possibly due to the similarity in the temperatures of the zones: the Centro   zone registered mean maximum and minimum temperatures of 33 and 23&deg;C, while the   Norte zone registered mean maximum and minimum temperatures of 35 and 23&deg;C.</p>     <p>The   climatic differences between the Centro and Norte zones and the Meseta of Ibague zone were clearly observed (mean maximum and   minimum temperatures of 27 and 20&deg;C), determinant factors for the yield of the   crops. The average production of the Meseta zone was   8.7 t ha<sup>-1</sup>, while, in the Centro and Norte zones, it was 7.9 and 7.6   t ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively (Fedearroz, 2008).   The critical temperatures (extremes), maximum and minimum, facilitated these   divergences because they caused serious disturbances in the development of the   plants. The average optimal temperature for the development of the rice plants   in the vegetative phase was found between 21 and 31&deg;C (night/day) (Yoshida,   1977). Likewise, Yoshida (1978) and Nakayama (1974) observed that temperatures   that are equal to or above 35&deg;C during the vegetative phase, which are common   in the Centro and Norte zones, generate reductions in the tillering,   plant height, and subsequent yield.  </p>     <p>On the   other hand, and in agreement with reports from Bernardes <i>et al</i>. (2011), Andreasen and Streibig (2010) and Rao <i>et al</i>.   (2007), the repeated use of herbicides, especially with the same action mechanism,   may possibly be responsible for the similarity reported in the present study   due to the fact that, in all of the zones of the department, only 4 action   mechanisms are used for the post-emergence active ingredients. The similarity   of the weed communities agree with the results of the species inventory because   it revealed that the breadth of the weed problem is represented by the same   species in all of the zones of the department.</p>     <p>In regards   to the obtained results, it was concluded that <i>E. colona</i>was the principal weed for the   three evaluated zones due to the fact that it presented the highest value for   the importance value index and frequency. In order of importance, the following   species were observed: <i>C. iria</i>, <i>I. rugosum</i>, <i>D. bicornis</i>, <i>P. boscianum</i>and <i>M. nudiflora</i>. The weed community of the Meseta zone was the most diverse, followed by the community   of the Norte zone. The composition of the weed community in the three zones was   dissimilar according to the similarity coefficients of Jaccard and Sorensen. However, the Steinhaus coefficient   demonstrated that the weed communities in these rice producing zones were   similar, with the highest level of similarity occurring between the communities   of the Centro and Norte zones.</p> &nbsp;     <p><font size="3"><b>Literature cited</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Andreasen, C. and J.C. Streibig.   2010. Evaluation of changes in weed flora in arable fields of Nordic countries   - based on Danish long-term surveys. Weed Res. 51, 214-226. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00836.x" target="_blank">10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00836.x</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190240&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Balduino, A.P.C., A.L. Souza, J.A.A.M. Neto,   A.F. Silva, and M.C.S. J&uacute;nior. 2005. Fitossociologia e an&aacute;lise comparativa da composi&ccedil;&atilde;o flor&iacute;stica do cerrado da flora de Paraopeba-MG. Rev. &Aacute;rvore 29, 25-34. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622005000100004" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-67622005000100004</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190241&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Bernardes S., M.B.,   E.L. Finoto, D. Bolonhezi,   W. Carrega, J.A.A. Albuquerque, and M.Z. Pirotta. 2011. Fitossociologia de plantas daninhas sob diferentes sistem&aacute;s de manejo de solo em &aacute;reas de reforma de cana crua. Rev. Agro@mbiente On-line 5, 173-181.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190242&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Booth, D.B.,   S.D. Murphy, and C.J. Swanton. 2003. Weed ecology in natural and agricultural   systems. Editorial CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851995281.0000" target="_blank">10.1079/9780851995281.0000</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190244&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Brighenti, A.M., C. Castro, D.L.P. Gazziero, F.S. Adegas, and E. Voll. 2003. Cadastramento fitossociol&oacute;gico de plantas daninhas na cultura de girasol. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 38, 651-657.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190245&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Cantillo, E.E., F.A. Lozada, and J.D. Pinz&oacute;n. 2006.   Dise&ntilde;o metodol&oacute;gico de restauraci&oacute;n de la reserva forestal carpatos Guasca-Cundinamarca. Undergraduate thesis. Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Universidad Distrital Francisco Jos&eacute; de Caldas, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190247&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Concen&ccedil;o, G., J.C. Salton, M.L. Secretti, P.B. Mendes, R.C. Brevilieri,   and L. Galon. 2011. Effect of long-term agricultural management systems on occurrence and composition of weed species. Planta Daninha 29, 515-522. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000300005" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-83582011000300005</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190249&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Concen&ccedil;o, G., C.J. Silva, L.A. Staut, C.S. Pontes, L.C.A.S. Laurindo,   and N.C.D.S. Souza. 2012a. Weeds occurrence in areas submitted to distinct winter crops. Planta Daninha 30, 747-755. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000400008" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-83582012000400008</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190250&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Concen&ccedil;o, G., G. Ceccon,   R.C. Sereia, I.V.T. Correia,   and L. Galon. 2012b. Phytosociology in agricultural   areas submitted to distinct wintercropping management. Planta Daninha 30, 297-304. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000200008" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-83582012000200008</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190251&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Concen&ccedil;o, G., M. Tomazi, I.V.T. Correia, S.A. Santos, and L. Galon. 2013. Phytosociological surveys: tools for weed science? Planta Daninha 31, 469-482. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582013000200025" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-83582013000200025</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190252&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Chauhan, B.S. and D.E. Johnson. 2009a.   Ecological studies on <i>Cyperus</i><i> difformis</i>, <i>Cyperus</i><i> iria</i> and <i>Fimbristylis</i><i> miliacea</i>:   three troublesome annual sedge weeds of rice. Ann. Appl. Biol. 155, 103-112. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00325.x" target="_blank">10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00325.x</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190253&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Chauhan, B.S. and D.E. Johnson. 2009b. Seed   germination ecology of junglerice (<i>Echinochloa</i><i> colona</i>): a   major weed of rice. Weed Sci. 57, 235-240. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-08-141.1" target="_blank">10.1614/WS-08-141.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190254&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Chauhan, B.S. and D.E. Johnson. 2010a.   Growth and reproduction of junglerice (<i>Echinochloa</i><i> colona</i>) in   response to water stress. Weed Sci. 58, 132-135. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-09-00016.1" target="_blank">10.1614/WS-D-09-00016.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190255&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Chauhan, B.S. and D.E. Johnson. 2010b.   Relative importance of shoot and root competition in dry-seeded rice growing   with junglerice (<i>Echinochloa</i><i> colona</i>) and ludwigia (<i>Ludwigia</i><i> hyssopifolia</i>).   Weed Sci. 58, 295-299. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-09-00068.1" target="_blank">10.1614/WS-D-09-00068.1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190256&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Cobb, A.H.   and J.P.H. Reade. 2010. Herbicides and plant physiology. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. J. Wiley and Sons, Oxford, UK. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444327793" target="_blank">10.1002/9781444327793</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190257&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Curtis, J.T.   and R.P. McIntosh. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31, 434-455. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1931497" target="_blank">10.2307/1931497</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190258&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Erasmo, E.A.L., L.L.A. Pinheiro,   and N.V. Costa. 2004. Levantamento fitossociol&oacute;gico das comunidades de plantas infestantes em &aacute;reas de produ&ccedil;&atilde;o de arroz irrigado cultivado sob diferentes sistemas de manejo. Planta Daninha 22, 195-201. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000200004" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-83582004000200004</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190259&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Fedearroz, Federaci&oacute;n Nacional de Arroceros. 2008. III Censo nacional arrocero. Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190260&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Felfili, J.M. and F. Venturoli. 2000. T&oacute;picos em an&aacute;lise de vegeta&ccedil;&atilde;o. Comunica&ccedil;&otilde;es T&eacute;cnicas Florestais 2, 1-25.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190262&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Ferriol M., M. and H.B. Merle F. 2006. El Inventario fitosociol&oacute;gico. In: Universitat Polit&egrave;cnica de Val&egrave;ncia, <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/10251/16818" target="_blank">http://hdl.handle.net/10251/16818</a>; consulted: March, 2015&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190264&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Fuentes, C.L., A.S. Osorio G., J.C. Granados T. and W.   Piedrahita C. 2006a. Flora arvense asociada con el cultivo del arroz en el   departamento del Tolima-Colombia. Bayer Cropscience;   Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190265&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fuentes, C.L., A. F&uacute;quene,   E.M. Perdomo, and S.C. Pinto. 2006b. Pl&aacute;ntulas de especies arvenses frecuentes en la zona centro de Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190267&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fuentes, C.L., A. Osorio, J.C. Granados, and W.   Piedrahita. 2010. Malezas de los arrozales de Am&eacute;rica Latina. pp. 387-341. In: Degiovani B., V., C.P. Mart&iacute;nez R., and F. Motta O. (eds.). Producci&oacute;n eco-eficiente del arroz en Am&eacute;rica Latina. Internacional Center of Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190269&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fried, G.,   L.R. Norton, and X. Reboud. 2008. Environmental and   management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in   France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 128, 68-76. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.003" target="_blank">10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.003</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190271&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Halvorson,   W.L. and P. Guertin. 2003. <i>Echinochloa</i> Beauv.   spp. U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, University of   Arizona. Tucson, AZ.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190272&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Holm,   L.G., D.L. Plucknett, J.V. Pancho,   and J.P. Herberger. 1991. The world&#39;s worst weeds: distribution and biology. University Press of Hawaii, Malabar, FL.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190274&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Hyvonen, T., E. Ketoja,   J. Salonen, H. Jalli, and   J. Tiainen. 2003. Weed species diversity and   community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals.   Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 97, 131-149. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00117-8" target="_blank">10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00117-8</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190276&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Inoue,   M.H., B.E. Silva, K.M. Pereira, D.C. Santana, P.A. Conciani, and C.L. Sztoltz. 2012. Levantamento fitossociol&oacute;gicoem pastagens. Planta Daninha 30, 55-63. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000100007" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-83582012000100007</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190277&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Kuva, M.A., R.A. Pitelli,   T.P. Salgado, and P.L.C.A. Alves. 2007. Fitossociologia de comunidades de plantas daninhas em agroecossistema cana-crua. Planta Daninha 25, 501-511. Doi:<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000300009" target="_blank"> 10.1590/S0100-83582007000300009</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190278&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Lamprecht, H. 1990.   Silvicultura en los tr&oacute;picos: los ecosistemas forestales en los bosques tropicales   y sus especies arb&oacute;reas; posibilidades y m&eacute;todos para un aprovechamiento sostenido. Deutsche Gesellschaft fu&#776;rTechnische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn, Germany.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190279&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Mercado, B.L. and R.L. Talatala. 1977. Competitive ability of <i>Echinochloa</i><i> colonum</i> L.   against direct-seeded lowland rice. pp. 161-165. In: Proc. 6th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. Jakarta, Indonesia.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190281&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Montealegre, F.A. 2011. Morfolog&iacute;a de pl&aacute;ntulas de malezas de clima c&aacute;lido. Produmedios, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190283&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg.   1976. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Geogr.   Rev. 66, 114-116. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/213332" target="_blank">10.2307/213332</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190285&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Nakayama,   H. 1974. Panicle senescence in rice plant. Bull. Hokuriku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 16, 15-17.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190286&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Pitelli, R.A. 2000. Estudos fitossociol&oacute;gicosem comunidades infestantes de agroecossistemas. J. Conserb. 1, 1-7.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190288&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Plaza, G.   and F.A. Hern&aacute;ndez. 2014. Effect of zone and crops rotation on <i>Ischaemum</i><i> rugosum</i> and   resistance to bispyribac-sodium in Ariari, Colombia. Planta Daninha 32, 591-599. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582014000300015" target="_blank">10.1590/S0100-83582014000300015</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190290&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000036&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Puentes, B. M. 2003. Flora arvense asociada al cultivo   de arroz (<i>Oryza</i><i> sativa</i> L.). MSc thesis. Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190291&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000037&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Radosevich, S., J. Holt, and C. Ghersa. 1997. Weed ecology: implications for management. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. J. Wiley and Sons, New York,   NY.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190293&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000038&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Ram&iacute;rez, R.A. 2010. An&aacute;lisis de   la composici&oacute;n flor&iacute;stica de arvenses asociadas al cultivo de tabaco en cinco municipios del departamento del Huila. Undergraduate thesis. Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190295&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000039&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Rao, A.N., D.E. Johnson, B. Sivaprasad, J.K. Ladha, and A.M.   Mortimer. 2007. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv. Agron.   93, 153-255. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1" target="_blank">10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190297&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000040&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Spiegel, M. 1988. Estad&iacute;stica: teor&iacute;a y 875 problemas resueltos. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. McGraw Hill, Madrid.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190298&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000041&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Yoshida,   S. 1977. Rice. pp. 57-87. In: Alvim, P. and T.   Kozlowski (eds.). Ecophysiology of tropical crops.   Academic Press. New York, NY. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-055650-2.50008-3" target="_blank">10.1016/B978-0-12-055650-2.50008-3</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190300&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000042&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Yoshida,   S. 1978. Tropical climate and its influence on rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Ba&ntilde;os, Philippines.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=190301&pid=S0120-9965201500010001000043&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andreasen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Streibig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of changes in weed flora in arable fields of Nordic countries - based on Danish long-term surveys]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Weed Res.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<page-range>214-226</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balduino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.P.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Júnior]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.C.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Fitossociologia e análise comparativa da composição florística do cerrado da flora de Paraopeba-MG]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Árvore]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>25-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernardes S.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finoto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bolonhezi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrega]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albuquerque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pirotta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Fitossociologia de plantas daninhas sob diferentes sistemás de manejo de solo em áreas de reforma de cana crua]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Agro@mbiente On-line]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>173-181</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Booth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murphy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swanton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Weed ecology in natural and agricultural systems]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Wallingford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial CABI Publishing]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brighenti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gazziero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.L.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adegas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Voll]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Cadastramento fitossociológico de plantas daninhas na cultura de girasol]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pesq. Agropec. Bras.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>651-657</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cantillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lozada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinzón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Diseño metodológico de restauración de la reserva forestal carpatos Guasca-Cundinamarca]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Concenço]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Secretti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brevilieri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of long-term agricultural management systems on occurrence and composition of weed species]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>515-522</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Concenço]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Staut]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pontes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laurindo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.C.A.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.C.D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Weeds occurrence in areas submitted to distinct winter crops]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>747-755</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Concenço]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ceccon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sereia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Correia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.V.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Phytosociology in agricultural areas submitted to distinct wintercropping management]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>297-304</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Concenço]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tomazi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Correia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.V.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Phytosociological surveys: tools for weed science?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>469-482</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chauhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecological studies on Cyperus difformis, Cyperus iria and Fimbristylis miliacea: three troublesome annual sedge weeds of rice]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann. Appl. Biol.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>155</volume>
<page-range>103-112</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chauhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Seed germination ecology of junglerice (Echinochloa colona): a major weed of rice]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Weed Sci.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<page-range>235-240</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chauhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Growth and reproduction of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) in response to water stress]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Weed Sci.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<page-range>132-135</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chauhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Relative importance of shoot and root competition in dry-seeded rice growing with junglerice (Echinochloa colona) and ludwigia (Ludwigia hyssopifolia)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Weed Sci.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<page-range>295-299</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cobb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reade]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Herbicides and plant physiology]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<edition>2nd</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[J. Wiley and Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Curtis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McIntosh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1950</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>434-455</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Erasmo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinheiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.L.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Levantamento fitossociológico das comunidades de plantas infestantes em áreas de produção de arroz irrigado cultivado sob diferentes sistemas de manejo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>195-201</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Fedearroz, Federación Nacional de Arroceros</collab>
<source><![CDATA[III Censo nacional arrocero]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Felfili]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Venturoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Tópicos em análise de vegetação]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comunicações Técnicas Florestais]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>1-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferriol M.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merle F.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El Inventario fitosociológico]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universitat Politècnica de València]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuentes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Osorio G.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granados T.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piedrahita C.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Flora arvense asociada con el cultivo del arroz en el departamento del Tolima-Colombia]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Bayer CropscienceUniversidad Nacional de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuentes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fúquene]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perdomo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Plántulas de especies arvenses frecuentes en la zona centro de Colombia]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuentes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Osorio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granados]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piedrahita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Malezas de los arrozales de América Latina]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Degiovani B.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez R.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Motta O.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Producción eco-eficiente del arroz en América Latina]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>387-341</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cali ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Internacional Center of Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fried]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Norton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reboud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>128</volume>
<page-range>68-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Halvorson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guertin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Echinochloa Beauv. spp.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Tucson^eAZ AZ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, University of Arizona]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Plucknett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pancho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herberger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The world's worst weeds: distribution and biology]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Malabar^eFL FL]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University Press of Hawaii]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hyvonen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ketoja]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salonen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jalli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tiainen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Weed species diversity and community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<page-range>131-149</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Inoue]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pereira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Conciani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sztoltz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Levantamento fitossociológicoem pastagens]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>55-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pitelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salgado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.L.C.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Fitossociologia de comunidades de plantas daninhas em agroecossistema cana-crua]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>501-511</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamprecht]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Silvicultura en los trópicos: los ecosistemas forestales en los bosques tropicales y sus especies arbóreas; posibilidades y métodos para un aprovechamiento sostenido]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Eschborn ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Deutsche Gesellschaft fu&#776;rTechnische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mercado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Talatala]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Competitive ability of Echinochloa colonum L. against direct-seeded lowland rice]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[6th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf.]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Jakarta </conf-loc>
<page-range>161-165</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montealegre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Morfología de plántulas de malezas de clima cálido]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogota ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Produmedios]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mueller-Dombois]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ellenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Aims and methods of vegetation ecology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geogr. Rev.]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<page-range>114-116</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nakayama]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Panicle senescence in rice plant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bull. Hokuriku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn.]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>15-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pitelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Estudos fitossociológicosem comunidades infestantes de agroecossistemas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Conserb.]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>1-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Plaza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of zone and crops rotation on Ischaemum rugosum and resistance to bispyribac-sodium in Ariari, Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Planta Daninha]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>591-599</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Puentes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Flora arvense asociada al cultivo de arroz (Oryza sativa L.)]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Radosevich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghersa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Weed ecology: implications for management]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<edition>2nd</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York^eNY NY]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[J. Wiley and Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramírez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análisis de la composición florística de arvenses asociadas al cultivo de tabaco en cinco municipios del departamento del Huila]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sivaprasad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ladha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortimer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Weed management in direct-seeded rice]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv. Agron.]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>93</volume>
<page-range>153-255</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spiegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estadística: teoría y 875 problemas resueltos]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<edition>2nd</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw Hill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yoshida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Rice]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alvim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kozlowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ecophysiology of tropical crops]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<page-range>57-87</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York^eNY NY]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yoshida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Tropical climate and its influence on rice]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Los Baños ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[International Rice Research Institute]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
