<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-9965</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Agronomía Colombiana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Agron. colomb.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-9965</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-99652015000300005</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n3.50237</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biomass distribution and allocation in diploid potato varieties (Solanum phureja Juz. et Buk.)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Distribución y asignación de biomasa en variedades de papa criolla (Solanum phureja Juz. et Buk.)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saldaña V.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Tatiana M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Patiño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jenniffer A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cotes-Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Miguel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Medellin ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>01</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>322</fpage>
<lpage>329</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-99652015000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-99652015000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-99652015000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[It is necessary to study the photosynthate distribution pattern and allocation in Guaneña and Latina potato varieties, which come from the Colombia variety and are relatively new in agriculture, for potato crops in Colombia. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution behavior of dry matter among the organs that make up the potato plant in order to determine the key moments in the crop cycle, where the filling of the tubers takes place, and to establish the pattern of biomass distribution in these varieties. Three consecutive experiments were performed at the "EstaciónAgraria Paysandú" in Santa Elena (Medellin - Antioquia), at 2,538 m a.s.l. with average temperatures of 13.6, 14.6 and 13.81°C. The field trials were established under a random complete blocks design with a 3x2 factorial layout and five replications. The first factor corresponded to the potato varieties and the second factor corresponded to the two fertilization levels: 7 and 21 g of fertilizer per planting site, representing 259.25 and 777.77 kg of fertilizer per ha. The higher fertilizer dose is the one normally used by farmers. An NPK fertilizer compound (10 - 20 - 20 - 5(S)) was used. There were 30 experiment units with an area of 18.27 m² (seven 2.7 m furrows separated by 0.90 m); the distance between the plants was 0.30 m, for a density of 37,037 planting sites per ha. Weekly samplings were taken, a whole plant per experiment unit. The direct measuring evaluated variables for the dry weights of each organ, which were used to obtain curves and the distribution pattern. The development time was evaluated in accumulated growing degree-days and threshold temperatures of 2 and 29°C were used. In all of the varieties and the two fertilization treatments, most of the assimilates in the early stages of the cycle were concentrated in the roots, leaves and stems; once the tuber formation started, the leaves and stems started to allocate dry matter towards the filling of the accumulation organs.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se hace necesario estudiar el patrón de distribución y asignación de los fotoasimilados en variedades de papa criolla Guaneña y Latina que provienen de la variedad Criolla Colombia y son relativamente nuevas en la agricultura en torno al cultivo de la papa en Colombia. El objetivo de este trabajo fue conocer el comportamiento de la distribución de la materia seca entre los órganos que conforman la planta de papa, con el fin de determinar los momentos claves en el ciclo de cultivo donde se está llevando a cabo el inicio del llenado de tubérculos y establecer el patrón de distribución de biomasa en las variedades mencionadas. Se realizaron tres experimentos consecutivos en la Estación Agraria Paysandú, ubicada en el Corregimiento de Santa Elena (Medellín - Antioquia) a 2.538 msnm. Se utilizó un diseño experimental de bloques completos al azar con dos niveles de fertilización correspondientes a 7 y 21 g de fertilizante por sitio que representan 259,25 y 777,77 kg de fertilizante/ha, y cinco repeticiones. La unidad experimental fue un área de 18,27 m² (7 surcos de 2,7 m de largo), la distancia entre surcos fue de 0,90 m, la distancia entre plantas fue de 0,30 m para una densidad de 37,037 sitios de siembra/ha. Se hicieron muestreos semanales correspondientes a una planta entera por unidad experimental. Las variables evaluadas de medición directa fueron los pesos secos de cada órgano y a partir de estos pesos se determinaron las curvas que determinan el patrón de distribución. El tiempo de desarrollo se evaluó en grados día acumulados y se utilizaron las temperaturas umbrales de 2 y 29°C. En todas las variedades en los dos tratamientos de fertilización la mayor parte de los asimilados en las fases iniciales del ciclo se concentran en las raíces, hojas y tallos y una vez se inicia la formación de tubérculos, las hojas y los tallos vierten la materia seca acumulada hacia el llenado de los órganos de acumulación.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[tubers]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[source sink relations]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[photosynthesis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[nutrient transport]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Guaneña variety]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Latina variety]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tubérculos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[relación fuente sumidero]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fotosíntesis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[transporte de nutrientes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[variedad Guaneña]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[variedad Latina]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="verdana" size="2"> &nbsp;     <p>Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n3.50237">10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n3.50237</a></p> &nbsp;    <p><font size="4">    <center> <b>Biomass   distribution and allocation in diploid potato varieties (<i>Solanum phureja </i>Juz. <i>et</i> Buk.)</b> </center></font></p> &nbsp;    <p><font size="3">    <center> <b>Distribuci&oacute;n y asignaci&oacute;n de biomasa en variedades de papa criolla (<i>Solanum phureja </i>Juz. <i>et </i>Buk.)</b> </center></font></p> &nbsp;    <p>    <center> <b>Tatiana M. Salda&ntilde;a V.<sup>1</sup>, Jenniffer A. Pati&ntilde;o<sup>1</sup>, and Jos&eacute; Miguel Cotes-Torres<sup>1</sup></b> </center></p>     <p><sup>1</sup> Departamento de Ciencias Agron&oacute;micas, Facultad de   Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Medellin   (Colombia). <a href="mailto:tmsaldanav@unal.edu.co">tmsaldanav@unal.edu.co</a></p>     <p>Received for   publication: 23 June, 2015. Accepted for   publication: 17 November, 2015.</p> <hr size="1">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p>It is necessary to study the photosynthate distribution pattern and allocation in Guane&ntilde;a and Latina potato varieties, which come from the Colombia   variety and are relatively new in agriculture, for potato crops in Colombia. The   aim of this study was to determine the distribution behavior of dry matter among   the organs that make up the potato plant in order to determine the key moments in   the crop cycle, where the filling of the tubers takes place, and to establish the   pattern of biomass distribution in these varieties. Three consecutive experiments   were performed at the &quot;Estaci&oacute;nAgraria Paysand&uacute;&quot; in Santa Elena (Medellin - Antioquia), at 2,538 m a.s.l.   with average temperatures of 13.6, 14.6 and 13.81&deg;C. The field trials were established   under a random complete blocks design with a 3x2 factorial layout and five replications.   The first factor corresponded to the potato varieties and the second factor corresponded   to the two fertilization levels: 7 and 21 g of fertilizer per planting site, representing   259.25 and 777.77 kg of fertilizer per ha. The higher fertilizer dose is the one   normally used by farmers. An NPK fertilizer compound (10 - 20 - 20 - 5(S)) was used.   There were 30 experiment units with an area of 18.27 m<sup>2</sup> (seven 2.7 m   furrows separated by 0.90 m); the distance between the plants was 0.30 m, for a   density of 37,037 planting sites per ha. Weekly samplings were taken, a whole plant   per experiment unit. The direct measuring evaluated variables for the dry weights   of each organ, which were used to obtain curves and the distribution pattern. The   development time was evaluated in accumulated growing degree-days and threshold   temperatures of 2 and 29&deg;C were used. In all of the varieties and the two fertilization   treatments, most of the assimilates in the early stages of the cycle were concentrated   in the roots, leaves and stems; once the tuber formation started, the leaves and stems started to allocate dry matter towards the filling of the accumulation organs.</p>     <p><b>Key words: </b>tubers, source   sink relations, photosynthesis, nutrient transport, Guane&ntilde;a variety, Latina variety.</p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>Se hace necesario estudiar el patr&oacute;n de distribuci&oacute;n y asignaci&oacute;n   de los fotoasimilados en variedades de papa criolla Guane&ntilde;a y Latina que provienen de la variedad Criolla Colombia   y son relativamente nuevas en la agricultura en torno al cultivo de la papa en Colombia.   El objetivo de este trabajo fue conocer el comportamiento de la distribuci&oacute;n de   la materia seca entre los &oacute;rganos que conforman la planta de papa, con el fin de   determinar los momentos claves en el ciclo de cultivo donde se est&aacute; llevando a cabo   el inicio del llenado de tub&eacute;rculos y establecer el patr&oacute;n de distribuci&oacute;n de biomasa   en las variedades mencionadas. Se realizaron tres experimentos consecutivos en la   Estaci&oacute;n Agraria Paysand&uacute;, ubicada en el Corregimiento de Santa Elena (Medell&iacute;n   - Antioquia) a 2.538 msnm. Se utiliz&oacute; un dise&ntilde;o experimental de bloques completos   al azar con dos niveles de fertilizaci&oacute;n correspondientes a 7 y 21 g de fertilizante   por sitio que representan 259,25 y 777,77 kg de fertilizante/ha, y cinco repeticiones.   La unidad experimental fue un &aacute;rea de 18,27 m<sup>2</sup> (7 surcos de 2,7 m de   largo), la distancia entre surcos fue de 0,90 m, la distancia entre plantas fue   de 0,30 m para una densidad de 37,037 sitios de siembra/ha. Se hicieron muestreos   semanales correspondientes a una planta entera por unidad experimental. Las variables   evaluadas de medici&oacute;n directa fueron los pesos secos de cada &oacute;rgano y a partir de   estos pesos se determinaron las curvas que determinan el patr&oacute;n de distribuci&oacute;n.   El tiempo de desarrollo se evalu&oacute; en grados d&iacute;a acumulados y se utilizaron las temperaturas   umbrales de 2 y 29&deg;C. En todas las variedades en los dos tratamientos de fertilizaci&oacute;n   la mayor parte de los asimilados en las fases iniciales del ciclo se concentran   en las ra&iacute;ces, hojas y tallos y una vez se inicia la formaci&oacute;n de tub&eacute;rculos, las   hojas y los tallos vierten la materia seca acumulada hacia el llenado de los &oacute;rganos de acumulaci&oacute;n.</p>     <p><b>Palabras clave:</b> tub&eacute;rculos,   relaci&oacute;n fuente sumidero, fotos&iacute;ntesis, transporte de nutrientes, variedad Guane&ntilde;a, variedad Latina.</p> <hr size="1">&nbsp;    <p><font size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     <p>The plants, as a result of the interaction   between the photosynthesis, respiration, assimilate transport and production, hydric   relationships and mineral nutrition accumulated and distributed dry matter in their   organs and increased their volume, length or area as a result of the cell differentiation,   expansion and division, <i>i.e</i>, plants grow and develop   to fully comply with the vegetative and reproductive phase (Larcher,   2003; Fourcaud <i>et al</i>., 2008; Taiz and Zeiger, 2010).</p>     <p>There are regulation centers involved   in the partition control of photoassimilates through which   enzyme activities and the f low of metabolic pathways can change (Warren, 1981).   In the assimilate builder organs or assimilate sources, the fixed carbon is shared   according to the physiological needs of the plant, such as the RuBisCO reconstitution involved in the Calvin cycle, in the   photo-respiration processes, and in the phosphoglyceraldehyde production for starch emergence located inside the chloroplasts or inside the sucrose   that is sent to the cytoplasm of cells (Taiz and Zeiger, 2010).</p>     <p>Plants produce carbohydrates (sugars)   in their leaves by photosynthesis; and consumer organs and accumulators known as   dumping organs that require products of this reaction to grow and develop (Foyer   and Paul, 2001); in the case of potatoes, these organs are the roots, stolons, f lowers, fruits and mainly tubers. The filling and   formation of tubers will depend primarily on the availability of previously produced   and temporarily stored assimilates in the stems and leaves, their capacity to store   these sugars in their tissues, genetic aspects of the plant and environmental conditions   under which they are being developed (Mora <i>et al.</i>, 2005). This partitioning   of photosynthates to tubers will then present a quantifiable   result of growth and development that is also influenced by cultural practices (Foyer   and Paul, 2001).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>In potato crops, a good translocation   of assimilates from the source to the tubers is decisive for the final production,   along with an understanding of the patterns of that biomass allocation between the   organs of the cultivated varieties and the effect of environmental conditions that   improve the selection of materials for a location or general purpose (Van Heemst, 1986; Tekalign and Hammes, 2005a).</p>     <p>Dry matter accumulation is used as   an indicator for growth because of its considerable economic significance since,   in the case of the potato, the tuber is the organ that   has photoassimilate storage mainly as starch (Tekalign and Hammes, 2005b).</p>     <p>Among other studies on the distribution   behavior of photoassimilates, there is one by Kooman and Rabbinge (1996) in which   the influence of temperature, photoperiod and radiation on potato crop growth, <i>Solanum tuberosum </i>L.,   and cycle length was determined; the authors emphasized that, in the first stage   of the crop, the biomass is distributed preferentially in leaves and stems; in the   second phase, the mass f low toward new and existing leaves is reduced because the   formation and filling of tubers starts and, in the third part of the cycle, the   tubers are the organs with the highest filling capacity and the only organs that   continue to grow until the harvest day, while the aerial part of the plant starts   to decay.</p>     <p>&Ntilde;&uacute;stez <i>et al</i>. (2009) assessed   the accumulation and distribution of dry matter in the organs of the varieties Diacol Capiro, Pastusa Suprema, Betina and Esmeralda from the <i>S. tuberosum </i>species and found differences in the dry matter accumulation in the stems, leaves   and tubers; these differences corresponded to the moment with greater accumulation   and duration of biomass in a particular organ.</p>     <p>Santos (2010) conducted an evaluation   of source-demand in terms of dry matter partition and allocation in the states of   vegetative and reproductive development of the diploid potato varieties Colombia, Guane&ntilde;a, Latina and Galeras.   In this study, the varieties Guane&ntilde;a and Galeras stood out because they allocated the largest proportion   of assimilates to the tubers, resulting in a higher yield, between 25,6 and 49,6 t ha<sup>-1</sup>.</p>     <p>In Mexico, Aguilar <i>et al. </i>(2006) conducted   a growth analysis of the source-demand of two potato varieties (<i>S. tuberosum</i>), the results showed   that the variety Alpha allocated 56% of its dry matter to the tubers. Meanwhile,   Mora <i>et al</i>. (2005) evaluated five potato genotypes and determined the behavior   of the accumulation and distribution of biomass.</p>     <p>Based on the above context, the aim   of this study was to determine the behavior and distribution pattern of biomass   in the diploid potato varieties Colombia, Guane&ntilde;a and   Latina during their crop cycle.</p> &nbsp;    <p><font size="3"><b>Materials   and methods</b></font></p>     <p><b>Location</b></p>     <p>Three consecutive growing cycles of   potato varieties in Santa Elena in eastern Antioquia (Colombia), at an altitude   of 2,538 m a.s.l. (6&deg;12&#39;36&#39;&#39; N and 75&deg;30&#39;25&#39;&#39; O) and with   average temperatures of 13.6, 13.81 and 14.6&deg;C, were established in the field. According to the ecological conditions, this area is classifies as a lower montane forest zone (bh-MB) (Holdridge, 1967).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Experiment   design</b></p>     <p>The field trials were established   under a random complete blocks design with a 3x2 factorial layout and five replications.   The first factor corresponded to the three varieties of potato and the second factor   corresponded to the two fertilization levels: 7 and 21 g of fertilizer per planting   site, representing 259.25 and 777.77 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> of fertilizer; the higher   dose of fertilizer corresponded to the one normally used by farmers. An NPK fertilizer   compound was used (10 - 20 - 20 - 5(S)). There were 30 experiment units with an   area of 18.27 m<sup>2</sup> (seven 2.7 m furrows separated by 0.90 m); the distance   between the plants was 0.30 m, for a density of 37,037 planting sites per hectare.</p>     <p><b>Variables   evaluated</b></p>     <p>A fully functional plant was extracted   weekly from each experiment unit to measure the variables listed below:</p>     <p>Dry matter: each plant was dissected,   separating each organ individually and packing them in paper bags. These samples   were placed in a drying oven at 80&deg;C until constant dry weight was obtained. With   this method, the dry weight of the leaves (DWL), stems (DWS), roots (DWR), stolons (DWST), tubers (DWTB), f lowers (DWF), and fruits (DWFR)   and the sum of the weights of the total dry weight of the plant (DWT) (Eq. 6) was obtained.</p>     <p>Time: the development time was evaluated   in terms of thermal time on accumulated degree-days (ADD), which takes into account   the weather information of where the experiments are carried out. To obtain this   information, a WatchDog 2900ET (Spectrum Technologies, Plansfield IL) weather station was used, which recorded   the temperature, sunshine, rainfall and relative humidity every 15 min.</p>     <p><b>Statistical   analysis</b></p>     <p>The incomplete gamma distribution   model was used (Wood, 1967) (Eq. 1) since it is consistent with the modeling theory   of crops based on models with lags (Manetsch, 1976; Vansickle, 1977; Gutierrez, 1996; Rodr&iacute;guez <i>et al</i>., 2011).</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05e1.gif"></center></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>This model can be linearized by the expression:</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05e2.gif"></center></p>     <p>To analyze the data, a multilevel   regression model varying regression coefficients (Gelman and Hill, 2007) from the Wood model for each treatment and trial was considered,   generating the following mixed model (Sorensen and Gianola,   2002).</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05e3.gif"></center></p>     <p>Where <i>a</i>, <i>b </i>and <i>g </i>are the average regression coefficient vectors for each treatment;   a, b and c are the vector deviations for each trial of average regression coefficients, u is the vector of coefficients of error due to the effect of blocks within the   sampling and trial, e is the vector of residual effects of the error, <font face="Times" size="3">l</font><sub>n</sub> is a vector of each size &quot;n&quot;, <font face="Times" size="3">l</font>n(t) is a vector with the logarithm of the thermal   time, t is a vector with the thermal time and Z<sub>1</sub>, Z<sub>2</sub> , Z<sub>3</sub> and Z<sub>4</sub> are the incidence matrices of the random effects, a, b, c and   u respectively. It was assumed that the random effects and the residual error followed   a normal distribution with zero mean and variance <font face="symbol" size="3">s</font><sup>2</sup><sub>a</sub>,   <font face="symbol" size="3">s</font><sup>2</sup><sub>b</sub>, <font face="symbol" size="3">s</font><sup>2</sup><sub>c</sub>, <font face="symbol" size="3">s</font><sup>2</sup><sub>u</sub> and <font face="symbol" size="3">s</font><sup>2</sup><sub>e</sub> (Searle <i>et al</i>., 1992).</p>     <p>Finally, <i>y </i>is the vector with   the answer variable to consider, that is, LF, DWT, DWL, DWS, DWR, DWST, DWTB, DWF, DWFR.</p>     <p>Because variable measurements are   made on the same individual, a multi-characteristic model was considered:</p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><a href="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05e4.gif">Equation 4</a></center></p>     <p>It was assumed that the vectors a,   b, c, u and e, were normally distributed with zero mean and variance R<sub>a</sub> <img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05s1.gif"> I<sub>a</sub>, R<sub>b</sub> <img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05s1.gif"> I<sub>a</sub>, R<sub>c</sub> <img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05s1.gif"> I<sub>a</sub>, R<sub>u</sub><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05s1.gif"> I<sub>a</sub> and R<sub>c</sub><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05s1.gif"> I<sub>a</sub> respectively, with the covariance   matrix R<sub>(&middot;)</sub> expressed in the following form (Eq. 5) (Sorensen and Gianola, 2002).</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05e5.gif"></center></p>     <p>where, I is an Identity   of a size, a is the number of variables to evaluate, n indicates the number of data of each variable i, i = {1, ... , a} and <img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05s1.gif"> is the Kronecker product.</p>     <p>The   Bayesian estimation methodology for the previous model was used with the Gibbs algorithm,   generating a Markov chain of a length of one million for each parameter. From every   10 samples, 1 was selected and the first 10,000 considered to be the burn-in period   were removed. The MCMCglmm package (Hadfield, 2010), of   the R statistical environment (R Core Team, 2013), was used. The highest posterior   density intervals of 0.90 were calculated with the CODA package (Plummer <i>et al</i>.,   2006) and, with the Bayes estimator, the average marginal posterior distribution   was obtained, which minimizes the quadratic loss function.</p>     <p>Based   on the Markov chain of obtained parameters for the original variables (TTDW, LDW,   SDW, RDW, STDW, TBDW, FDW, FRDW), the ratio (PP) of dry matter was obtained in each   organ for the evaluated time with the expression:</p>     <p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05e6.gif"></center></p>     <p>where, (j) corresponds   to LDW, SDW, R DW, STDW, TBDW, FDW, FRDW.</p> &nbsp;    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3"><b>Results   and discussion</b></font></p>     <p>To establish the existence of significant   differences between the curves obtained for the leaf area and dry matter accumulation,   a comparison of the highest posterior density intervals was made of the fitted model   for each variety in each of the levels of fertilization. In this regard, each graph   allowed for the determination of these statistical differences with the curves of   the highest posterior density intervals of 0.90.</p>     <p>The organs with the greater amount   of dry matter accumulated over the crop cycle are the leaves, stems and tubers;   however, the proportion of total plant biomass for each organ changes according   to the variety, nutritional conditions and phenological stage; for example, in the vegetative phase, the leaves and stems demand assimilates,   which changes to the f lowers and fruits in the reproductive phase. In addition,   in crops like the one evaluated in this study, the greatest filling capacity corresponds   to the tubers as the starch storage organ and the one of main economic interest.</p>     <p><b>Criolla Colombia   variety</b></p>     <p>The fertilizing effect over this variety   is not noticeable; however, it is possible to perceive differences in the proportion   of stem in relation to the total of the plant, which increases with the highest   dose. With the 7 g/site dose, in the early stages of the crop cycle, the roots were   the ones that represented the greatest amount of accumulated biomass (52.34%) at   255 ADD, a decreasing value over time. This proportion decreased to half at 390.18   ADD (with a rapid decline) and by the end of the cycle at 1,252 ADD the roots represent   only 1.98% total of the plant. Stolons, throughout the   cycle, represented a fraction of the total plant, reaching the maximum proportion   at 643.66 ADD (2.66%), and, at the end of the cycle, the proportion of this organ   was less than 1%.</p>     <p>In the early stages of growth at 255   ADD, the leaves and stems were 33.99 and 13.65%, respectively. The highest proportion   of leaves to total plant was registered at 508.47ADD (52.71%), but this time did   not coincide with the maximum dry matter accumulation in the leaves or the maximum   leaf area as recorded above 600 ADD. From that moment of maximum proportion leaves/total   plant this begins to decrease, becoming almost 35% at 829.54 ADD and continued to   slowly decrease until the end of the cycle, reaching 6.88% of the total. The largest   proportion of stems was reached at 694.35 ADD (28.47%) and, as seen in the leaves,   after the maximum ratio, it declined until the end, with 10.11% of the total plant   (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>).</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f1"><a href="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05f1.jpg" target="_blank">Figure 1</a></a></center></p>     <p>Decreased dry matter proportion of   the leaves and stems started when the emergence of the tubers at 440.88 ADD (0.61%).   This organ rapidly increased its share in the plant, achieving a maximum of 72.32%   at 1,252 ADD.</p>     <p>In the corresponding dose of 21 g/site,   the behavior of the proportions of the roots, stolons and stems was similar. In the leaves, the maximum rate was reached at 423.98 ADD   with a value of 54.77% and, at the end of the cycle, this organ represented 7.56%.   The emergence of the first tubers was at 440.88 ADD (0.69%) and, at the end of the   cycle, their ratio was 71.32%.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Although the behavior of the ratios   of the organs in this study matches Santos (2010), the proportions were lower in   their experiment, reporting final proportions for the tubers at 50% of the total   plant.</p>     <p>In a study that determined the behavior   of the distribution of biomass in varieties of <i>S. tuberosum</i>, &Ntilde;&uacute;stez <i>et al</i>. (2009) found similar results,   where the highest proportion of leaves in the Betina variety   corresponded to a value close to 40% five weeks after emergence. But values above   80% were reported at the end of the cycle in tubers because the species we evaluated   ended their cycle with total plant death, unlike the varieties of this study that   ended their cycle alive since they did not have senescence. Likewise, Aguilar <i>et     al</i>. (2006) reported a similar behavior in the Alpha and Milagros varieties.</p>     <p><b>Criolla Guane&ntilde;a variety</b></p>     <p>The behavior for the assimilate distribution   of the Criolla Guane&ntilde;a variety   did present differences regarding the fertilizer rate. At the beginning of the life   cycle of the crop (255 ADD), the organ that occupied the largest proportion was   the roots, with values of 52.70 and 50.98% for the doses of 7 and 21 g/site of fertilizer,   respectively. The leaves followed the roots with a higher proportion at this time   of the cycle, with values of 33.24 and 34.05%, respectively (<a href="#f2">Fig. 2</a>).</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f2"><a href="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05f2.jpg" target="_blank">Figure 2</a></a></center></p>     <p>The differences were noticed when   the organs, such as the stems, reached their maximum proportion. For the low fertilizer   dose, the stems reached their greatest proportion at 626.76 ADD, corresponding to   25.96%, while, in the highest dose, the maximum proportion (31.65%) was achieved   84.49 ADD later and this proportion was maintained longer. 152 ADD later, the proportion   began to decrease until it reached 11.05% at 1,252 ADD and, in the low dose, at   the end of the cycle the stems correspond to 25% of the plant.</p>     <p>The leaves achieved the maximum proportion   at 491.57 ADD with both fertilizer doses, 49.75 and 54.05%   for the lowest and highest doses, respectively; at the end of the cycle at 1,252   ADD with the lower dose, the leaves occupied 19.73% and, with the higher dose, they   occupied 7.41%. The most obvious difference was observed in the distribution of   biomass in the tubers. With the 7 g/site dose, this organ emerged at 440.88 ADD   at a rate of 1.09%. With the 21 g/site dose, the tubers emergence was recorded at   508.47 ADD at 1.36% of the plant. The increase in the proportion of this organ was   a constant for the higher dose of fertilizer, which did not stop its progress and   which corresponded to 74.38% of the plant at 1,252 ADD. At low doses, an increase   in the proportion of the tubers went up to 40.81% at 1,066.11 ADD; this ratio dropped   until the end of the cycle where it registered a value of 36.81%.</p>     <p>In the low dose of fertilizer in this   variety, the significant increase in the proportion of fruit in the final stage   of the crop, which went from 0.42% (at 812.64 ADD) to 12.98% (at the end of the   cycle), was noticable. This led to the conclusion that,   with the lower fertilizer dose, tubers in the Guane&ntilde;a variety had to lose some of the filling capacity, leading to the sexual reproduction   organs; in this case, the fruits have won this important total percentage of the   plant.</p>     <p>For the same variety, Santos (2010),   although not as clear as in this study, also reported an increase in the proportion   of fruit and a stability in the increase of the proportion of tubers in the plant.   The distribution of biomass in terms of other organs also differed since the author   reported the highest proportion of leaves in the initial phase, with a 50% and continuously   decreases until the end and the maximum proportion of tubers was recorded at the   end of cycle, 77 d after sowing with a value of 50% as well.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&Ntilde;&uacute;stez <i>et al. </i>(2009), for the Pastusa Suprema variety, reported   a similar behavior where the leaves and stems gradually increased their share until   the emergence of the tubers when they started to decrease.</p>     <p><b>Criolla Latina   variety</b></p>     <p>This variety has a similar behavior   to the Guane&ntilde;a variety at low and high doses of fertilizer.</p>     <p>Starting the cycle, at 255 ADD in   the low dose of fertilizer the organ representing the largest proportion of the   plant is the root (58.83%) followed by leaves and stems with values of 30.07 and   10.48% respectively. Both the leaves and stems increased their proportion to reach   a maximum and then decreased until the end of the cycle. The largest proportion   of leaves, 57.16%, occurred at 423.98 ADD and the maximum proportion of stems,   25.46%, was seen at 694ADD. The decline in the proportion of these organs was constant   until 1,252 ADD, with values of 10.27% in the leaves and 14.32% in the stems (<a href="#f3">Fig.   3</a>).</p>     <p>    <center><a name="f3"><a href="img/revistas/agc/v33n3/v33n3a05f3.jpg" target="_blank">Figure 3</a></a></center></p>     <p>In the high dose of fertilizer, at   255ADD, the organ that had the biggest proportion was the leaves (44.00%), followed   by the roots (42.74%) and then the stems with a ratio of 12.77%. The maximum proportion   of leaves was reached at 423.98 ADD, with a value of 57.16%, which dropped until   1,252 ADD, finishing with 4.90%. The stems reached the maximum proportion at 694.35   ADD with a 29.93% value and ended the cycle with 7.46% of the total plant.</p>     <p>Similar to the Guane&ntilde;a variety, differences in the distribution of biomass   in the tubers can be seen when comparing the fertilizer dose. The emergence of the   organ was recorded in both doses at 440.88 ADD, with a proportion of 1.56% with   the 7 g/site dose and 0.21% with the 21 g/ site dose. At the high dose, the behavior   of the distribution of the dry matter to the tubers progressively increased the   proportion of this organ until the end of the cycle, with a value of 83.13% (increase   that occurs until 1,184 ADD where it stabilizes). In this case, the fruits also   showed an increase in the proportion, ending the cycle with a value of 13.57%.</p>     <p>According to the results of Santos   (2010), a higher proportion of tubers was obtained at the end of the cycle. This author reported a   maximum proportion 77 d after sowing, with a value of 60%. However, in the behavior   and progress of the distribution over time, these results agree with the findings   of Aguilar <i>et al</i>. (2006), Mora <i>et al</i>. (2005),   and &Ntilde;&uacute;stez <i>et al</i>. (2009) for each of the varieties of the <i>S. tuberosum </i>species.</p>     <p>In general terms, the results of this   study agree with Meena <i>et al</i>. (2014), where the   maximum tuber formation and tuber bulking rate were recorded from 60 to 90 d after   crop sowing, during the large growth phase. This occurred because of the availability   of nutrients for crop growth and development, as well as for partitioning of the   dry matter production. Similarly, the results of Silva <i>et al</i>. (2013) showed   that, in the Bintje variety, tuber filling starts 60 d   after sowing and the volume of the tubers is greater when applying more calcium   than nitrogen, while in the Atlantic variety, the largest volume of tubers occurs   when there is more nitrogen than calcium.</p> &nbsp;    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3"><b>Conclusion</b></font></p>     <p>The expected results according to   literature were obtained. In the vegetative phase of the plants, photosynthates are used for the formation of new stems and leaves   and, in the reproductive phase, they tend to accumulate dry matter in the f lowers   and fruits; in the particular case of this species, the reproductive organs had   a lower filling capacity than the tubers, which are the organs used for the storage   of starch.</p> &nbsp;    <p><font size="3"><b>Literature   cited</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Aguilar, M.G., J. Carrillo, A. Rivera, and V. Gonz&aacute;lez. 2006. Growth analysis   and sink-source relationships in two potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum </i>L.) varieties. Rev. Fitotec.   Mex. 29, 145-156.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192715&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Fourcaud, T., X. Zhang, A.   Stokes, H. Lambers, and C. K&ouml;rner.   2008. Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing   importance of plant architecture in growth models. Ann. Bot. 101, 1053-1063. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn050" target="_blank">10.1093/aob/mcn050</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192717&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Foyer, C. and M.   Paul. 2001. Source - Sink relationships. pp. 1-11. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences.   Nature Publishing Group, London. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0001304"  target="_blank">10.1038/npg.els.0001304</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192718&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Gelman,   A. and J. Hill. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192719&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Gutierrez, A.P. 1996. Applied population ecology: a supply-demand approach. Wiley,   New York, NY.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192721&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Hadfield, J.D. 2010. MCMC methods for   multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMC glmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1-22. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i02" target="_blank">10.18637/jss.v033.i02</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192723&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Holdridge, L. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Life Science, San Jose.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192724&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Kooman,   P.L. and R. Rabbinge. 1996. An analysis   of the relation between dry matter allocation to the tuber   and earliness of a potato crop. Ann. Bot. 77, 235-242. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0027" target="_blank">10.1006/anbo.1996.0027</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192726&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Larcher,   W. 2003. Physiological plant ecology. Ecophysiology and stress physiology   of the functional groups. 4<sup>th </sup>ed. Annals of   Botany.Springer, Berlin. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05214-3" target="_blank">10.1007/978-3-662-05214-3</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192727&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Manetsch, T.J. 1976. Time-varying   distributed delays and their use in aggregative models of large systems. IEEE Trans.   Syst., Man, Cybern. SMC-6, 547-553. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1976.4309549" target="_blank">10.1109/TSMC.1976.4309549</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192728&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Meena, B.P., A. Kumar, M.L. Dotaniya, N.K. Jat, and B. La l. 2014. Effect of organic   sources of nutrients on tuber bulking rate, grades and specific gravity of potato   tubers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci., 1-7. Doi: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0398-4" target="_blank">10.1007/s40011-014-0398-4</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192729&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Mora, R., J. Ortiz, A. Rivera, M. Colinas, H. Lozoya, and J. Rodr&iacute;guez. 2005.   Comportamiento de la acumulaci&oacute;n y distribuci&oacute;n de biomasa en genotipos de papa   establecidos en condiciones de secano. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 11, 135-142.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192730&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>&Ntilde;&uacute;stez, C., M. Santos, and M. Segura. 2009. Dry matter allocation and partitioning   of four potato varieties (<i>Solanum tuberosum </i>L.) in Zipaquir&aacute;, Cundinamarca   (Colombia). Rev. Fac. Nal. Agr. Medellin   62, 4823-4834.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192732&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Plummer, M., N. Best, K. Cowles, and   K. Vines. 2006. CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News   6, 7-11.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192734&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>R Core Team. 2013. A language   and environment for statistical computing. <a href="http://www.r-project.org/" target="_blank">www.r-project.org</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192736&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Rodr&iacute;guez, D., J.R.   Cure, J.M. Cotes, A.P. Gutierrez, and F. Cantor. 2011. A coffee agroecosystem model: I. Growth and development of the coffee   plant. Ecol. Model. 222, 3626-3639. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.08.003" target="_blank">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.08.003</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192737&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Santos, M. 2010. Evaluaci&oacute;n del crecimiento, desarrollo y componentes de rendimiento   de cuatro cultivares de papa criolla en dos loca lidades del depar ta mento de Cundina marca. MSc thesis. Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192738&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>S earle, S., G. Casella, and C.E. McCulloch. 1992. Variance components. Jhon Wiley and Sons, New York, N Y. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470316856" target="_blank">10.1002/9780470316856</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192740&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Silva, J.G., M.G.C. Fran&ccedil;a, F.T.F. Gomide, and J.R. Magalhaes. 2013. Different nitrogen sources affect   biomass partitioning and quality of potato production in a hydroponic system. Amer.   J. Potato Res. 90, 179-185. <a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-012-9297-5" target="_blank">10.1007/s12230-012-9297-5</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192741&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Sorensen, D. and   D. Gianola. 2002. Likelihood, bayesian,   and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics (statistics for biology and health).   Springer, Madison, MS. Doi<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b98952" target="_blank">: 10.1007/b98952</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192742&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Taiz,   L. and E. Zeiger. 2010. Plant physiology. 5<sup>th</sup> ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192743&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Tekalign,   T. and P.S. Hammes. 2005a. Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and   reproductive growth. I. Stomatal conductance, rate   of transpiration, net photosynthesis, and dry matter production and allocation. Sci. Hortic. 105, 13-27. Doi: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.029" target="_blank">10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.029</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192745&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Tekalign,   T. and P.S. Hammes. 2005b. Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and   reproductive growth. II. Growth analysis, tuber yield and quality. Sci. Hortic. 105, 29-44. Doi: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.021" target="_blank">10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.021</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192746&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Van Heemst,   H.D.J. 1986. The distribution of dry matter during growth of a   potato crop. Potato Res. 29, 55-66. Doi: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361981" target="_blank">10.1007/BF02361981</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192747&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Vansick le, J. 1977. Attrition in distributed delay models. IEEE Trans. Syst.,   Man, Cybern. SMC-7, 635-638. Doi: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309800" target="_blank">10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309800</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192748&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Warren, J. 1981. Analysis of growth, photosynthesis and light interception for single   plants and stands. Ann. Bot. 48, 507-512.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192749&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Wood, P. 1967. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 216, 164-165. Doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/216164a0" target="_blank">10.1038/216164a0</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=192751&pid=S0120-9965201500030000500027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aguilar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rivera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Growth analysis and sink-source relationships in two potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Fitotec. Mex.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>145-156</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fourcaud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stokes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lambers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Körner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann. Bot.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>101</volume>
<page-range>1053-1063</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paul]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Source - Sink relationships]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<page-range>1-11</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Nature Publishing Group]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New YorkNY ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gutierrez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Applied population ecology: a supply-demand approach]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York^eNY NY]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wiley]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadfield]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMC glmm R package]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Stat. Softw.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>1-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holdridge]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Life zone ecology]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Jose ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Tropical Life Science]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kooman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rabbinge]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[An analysis of the relation between dry matter allocation to the tuber and earliness of a potato crop]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann. Bot.]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>235-242</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larcher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Physiological plant ecology. Ecophysiology and stress physiology of the functional groups]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<edition>4th</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manetsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Time-varying distributed delays and their use in aggregative models of large systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<page-range>547-553</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kumar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dotaniya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[La l]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of organic sources of nutrients on tuber bulking rate, grades and specific gravity of potato tubers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. B Biol. Sci.]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>1-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mora]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rivera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colinas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lozoya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Comportamiento de la acumulación y distribución de biomasa en genotipos de papa establecidos en condiciones de secano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>135-142</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ñústez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Segura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Dry matter allocation and partitioning of four potato varieties (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Zipaquirá, Cundinamarca (Colombia)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Fac. Nal. Agr. Medellin]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<page-range>4823-4834</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Plummer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Best]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cowles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vines]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[R News]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>7-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>R Core Team</collab>
<source><![CDATA[A language and environment for statistical computing]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cure]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cotes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gutierrez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cantor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A coffee agroecosystem model: I. Growth and development of the coffee plant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecol. Model.]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>222</volume>
<page-range>3626-3639</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Evaluación del crecimiento, desarrollo y componentes de rendimiento de cuatro cultivares de papa criolla en dos loca lidades del depar ta mento de Cundina marca]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[S earle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McCulloch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Variance components]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York^eN Y N Y]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Jhon Wiley and Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[França]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gomide]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.T.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magalhaes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Different nitrogen sources affect biomass partitioning and quality of potato production in a hydroponic system]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Amer. J. Potato Res.]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>90</volume>
<page-range>179-185</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sorensen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gianola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Likelihood, bayesian, and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics (statistics for biology and health)]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madison^eMS MS]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zeiger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Plant physiology]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<edition>5th</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Sunderland^eMA MA]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sinauer Associates]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tekalign]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and reproductive growth. I. Stomatal conductance, rate of transpiration, net photosynthesis, and dry matter production and allocation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sci. Hortic.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>105</volume>
<page-range>13-27</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tekalign]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and reproductive growth. II. Growth analysis, tuber yield and quality]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sci. Hortic.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>105</volume>
<page-range>29-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Heemst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.D.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The distribution of dry matter during growth of a potato crop]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Potato Res.]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>55-66</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vansick le]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Attrition in distributed delay models]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<page-range>635-638</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Warren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Analysis of growth, photosynthesis and light interception for single plants and stands]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann. Bot.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<page-range>507-512</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nature]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<volume>216</volume>
<page-range>164-165</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
