<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0121-5051</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Innovar]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Innovar]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0121-5051</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0121-50512009000300003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gender, age and brand in Children's Christmas request: A Content Analysis of Chilean Children's Letters to Santa]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Género, edad y marca en los pedidos de regalos de los niños: un análisis del contenido de las cartas de los niños chilenos a Santa Claus]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Genre, âge et marque des souhaits de cadeaux des enfants: une analyse du contenudes lettres à Saint Nicolas des enfants chiliens]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Gênero, idade e marca nos pedidos de presentes das crianças: Uma análise do conteúdo das cartas das crianças chilenas ao Papai Noel]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uribe Bravo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rodrigo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carolina]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,The University of Chile Business School ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,The University of Chile Business School ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2009</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2009</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>35</numero>
<fpage>19</fpage>
<lpage>31</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0121-50512009000300003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0121-50512009000300003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0121-50512009000300003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This study examines children's consumption request in the context of a Latin American country. Concretely, this paper analyzes the amount and nature of gifts requested by Chilean children in their Christmas letters to Santa Claus in 2005. Results suggest, on the one hand, the presence of a small amount of gifts requested (as previous studies have stated), the gendered nature of them (in under-11 year-old kids) as well as a low presence of brands (as compared with figures reported by previous research). On the other hand, this study found a significant role played by age and gender in terms of type of gift and brand usage in the request.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Este estudio desarrolla un análisis de contenido de una muestra aleatoria de cartas escritas a Santa Claus por parte de un grupo de niños chilenos. El objetivo fue analizar la cantidad y naturaleza de las peticiones de consumo infantiles en términos del rol del género, edad, presencia de marca y estilo persuasivo usado. Los resultados muestran que las variables sexo y edad son de alta relevancia para explicar diferencias. En el caso de la primera, se detectó diferencias en qué regalos solicitaban y en la presencia de marcas en las peticiones. En el caso de la edad, se detectaron cambios en relación número de peticiones, el tipo de regalos solicitados, en el uso de las marcas y en el estilo de la petición realizada.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[L'étude développe une analyse du contenu d'un échantillon aléatoire de lettres écrites à Saint Nicolas par un groupe d'enfants chiliens, l'objectif étant l'analyse de la quantité et de la nature des demandes de consommation des enfants, suivant le rôle du genre, de l'âge, de la présence d'une marque et du style persuasif utilisé. Les résultats obtenus démontrent que les variables sexe et âge sont de grande importance pour expliquer les différences. Pour la première variable, des différences sont détectées concernant le genre de cadeau souhaité et la présence de marques dans la demande. Pour l'âge, des changements sont détectés par rapport au nombre de demandes, au genre de cadeau de mandé, à la marque utilisée et au style de demande réalisée.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este estudo desenvolve uma análise de conteúdo de uma amostra aleatória de cartas escritas ao Papai Noel por parte de um grupo de crianças chilenas. O objetivo foi analisar a quantidade e natureza das petições de consumo infantis em termos de papel do gênero, idade, presença de marca e estilo persuasivo usado. Os resultados mostram que as variáveis sexo e idade são de alta relevância para explicar diferenças. No caso da primeira, detectou-se diferenças em que presentes pediam e na presença de marcas nas petições. No caso da idade, detectaram-se mudanças em relação ao número de petições, o tipo de presentes solicitados, no uso das marcas e no estilo da petição realizada.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Christmas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[children's request]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[brands]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[gender]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[age]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Chile]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Navidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[child's request]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[marcas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[género]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[edad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Chile]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Noël]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[souhaits des enfants]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[marques]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[genre]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[âge]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Chili]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Décisions stratégiques]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[efficience]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[organisations publiques]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font size="2" face="verdana">       <p>       <center>     <font size="4"><b>Gender, age and brand in Children's Christmas request</b></font><font size="3"><b>: A Content Analysis of      Chilean Children's Letters to Santa</b></font>    </center> </p>     <p>       <center>     <font size="3"><b>G&eacute;nero, edad y marca en los pedidos de regalos de los ni&ntilde;os: un an&aacute;lisis del contenido de      las cartas de los ni&ntilde;os chilenos a Santa Claus</b></font>   </center> </p>     <p>       <center>     <font size="3"><b>Genre, &acirc;ge et marque des souhaits de cadeaux des enfants: une analyse du contenudes     lettres &agrave; Saint Nicolas des enfants chiliens       </b></font>   </center> </p>     <p>       <center>     <font size="3"><b>G&ecirc;nero, idade e marca nos pedidos de presentes das crian&ccedil;as. Uma an&aacute;lise do conte&uacute;do     das cartas das crian&ccedil;as chilenas ao Papai Noel       </b></font>   </center> </p>      <p> Rodrigo Uribe Bravo* &amp; Carolina Mart&iacute;nez**</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>* Assistant Professor, Business School, The   University of Chile.   Correo electr&oacute;nico:    <a href="mailto:ruribe@fen.uchile.cl">ruribe@fen.uchile.cl</a></p>     <p>  ** Researcher. Business School. The University   of Chile.   Correo electr&oacute;nico: <a href="mailto:cmartinezt@fen.uchile.cl"> cmartinezt@fen.uchile.cl</a></p>      <p><hr></p>      <p><font size="3"><b>Abstract</b></font></p>      <p>  This study examines children's consumption request in the context of a Latin American country. Concretely, this paper analyzes the   amount and nature of gifts requested by Chilean children in their Christmas letters to Santa Claus in 2005. Results suggest, on the one   hand, the presence of a small amount of gifts requested (as previous studies have stated), the gendered nature of them (in under-11   year-old kids) as well as a low presence of brands (as compared with figures reported by previous research). On the other hand, this   study found a significant role played by age and gender in terms of type of gift and brand usage in the request.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>Key words:</b></font> </p>      <p>Christmas, children's request, brands, gender, age, Chile.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>Resumen</b></font></p>      <p>  Este estudio desarrolla un an&aacute;lisis de contenido de una muestra aleatoria de cartas escritas a Santa Claus por parte de un grupo de   ni&ntilde;os chilenos. El objetivo fue analizar la cantidad y naturaleza de las peticiones de consumo infantiles en t&eacute;rminos del rol del g&eacute;nero,   edad, presencia de marca y estilo persuasivo usado. Los resultados muestran que las variables sexo y edad son de alta relevancia para   explicar diferencias. En el caso de la primera, se detect&oacute; diferencias en qu&eacute; regalos solicitaban y en la presencia de marcas en las   peticiones. En el caso de la edad, se detectaron cambios en relaci&oacute;n n&uacute;mero de peticiones, el tipo de regalos solicitados, en el uso de   las marcas y en el estilo de la petici&oacute;n realizada.</p>        <p><font size="3"><b>Palabras clave:</b></font> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Navidad, child's request, marcas, g&eacute;nero, edad, Chile.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>R&eacute;sum&eacute;</b></font></p>     <p>  L'&eacute;tude d&eacute;veloppe une analyse du contenu d'un &eacute;chantillon al&eacute;atoire de lettres &eacute;crites &agrave; Saint Nicolas par un groupe d'enfants chiliens,   l'objectif &eacute;tant l'analyse de la quantit&eacute; et de la nature des demandes de consommation des enfants, suivant le r&ocirc;le du genre, de l'&acirc;ge, de   la pr&eacute;sence d'une marque et du style persuasif utilis&eacute;. Les r&eacute;sultats obtenus d&eacute;montrent que les variables sexe et &acirc;ge sont de grande   importance pour expliquer les diff&eacute;rences. Pour la premi&egrave;re variable, des diff&eacute;rences sont d&eacute;tect&eacute;es concernant le genre de cadeau   souhait&eacute; et la pr&eacute;sence de marques dans la demande. Pour l'&acirc;ge, des changements sont d&eacute;tect&eacute;s par rapport au nombre de demandes,   au genre de cadeau de mand&eacute;, &agrave; la marque utilis&eacute;e et au style de demande r&eacute;alis&eacute;e.</p>     <p>  <font size="3"><b>Mots - clefs:</b></font> </p>     <p>No&euml;l, souhaits des enfants, marques, genre, &acirc;ge, Chili.</p>      <p>  <font size="3"><b>Resumo</b></font></p>     <p>  Este estudo desenvolve uma an&aacute;lise de conte&uacute;do de uma amostra aleat&oacute;ria de cartas escritas ao Papai Noel por parte de um grupo   de crian&ccedil;as chilenas. O objetivo foi analisar a quantidade e natureza das peti&ccedil;&otilde;es de consumo infantis em termos de papel do g&ecirc;nero,   idade, presen&ccedil;a de marca e estilo persuasivo usado. Os resultados mostram que as vari&aacute;veis sexo e idade s&atilde;o de alta relev&acirc;ncia para   explicar diferen&ccedil;as. No caso da primeira, detectou-se diferen&ccedil;as em que presentes pediam e na presen&ccedil;a de marcas nas peti&ccedil;&otilde;es.   No caso da idade, detectaram-se mudan&ccedil;as em rela&ccedil;&atilde;o ao n&uacute;mero de peti&ccedil;&otilde;es, o tipo de presentes solicitados, no uso das marcas e   no estilo da peti&ccedil;&atilde;o realizada.</p>     <p>  <font size="3"><b>Palavras chave:</b></font> </p>     <p>D&eacute;cisions strat&eacute;giques, efficience, organisations publiques.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>Introduction</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  The emergence of new trends such as the increasing purchase   influence of kids, as well as the developments of   media outlets and brands particularly targeted to them,   has revitalised the interest of scholars and practitioners   in analysing the characteristics of children's consumer   behaviour. Focusing on both revising previous findings   and providing new insights into understanding the characteristics   of this particular segment of consumers, several   studies have been published trying to determine   how kids behave in a world in which marketing permeate their daily lives (Gunter et al., 2005).</p>     <p>  Authors have used different notions to examine and interpret   the behaviour of children (Gunter &amp; Furnham,   1998; Valkenburg &amp; Cantor, 2001). Some of them have   emphasised the idea of "inter-generational influence"   between parents and children (see Cotte &amp; Wood, 2004   and Viswanathan et al., 2000) or the perspective of "family   decision-making" in terms of the role of each member   in relation to spending habits (Lee &amp; Beatty, 2002; and   Tinson et al., 2008). Nevertheless, the vast majority of   the studies have assumed the viewpoint of "consumer socialisation",   which emphasises how children's behaviour   evolve as they mature and assume social roles (Roedder,   1999). For example, a recent study from Dotson and Hyatt   (2005) provided an empirical explanation of how the   consumer socialization process currently works with children.   They detected five major influence factors: irrational   social influence, importance of television, familial   influence, shopping importance, and brand importance (Lueg et al., 2005).</p>     <p>  Since children's income is limited, studies examining   this issue have rarely focalized on kids' purchasing behaviour.   With the exception of low-price products (those   that little children can buy with their pocket money), an   important part of research on this field has used kids' requests   as a proxy measure of their consumer behaviour   (Roedder, 1999). In this vein, Christmas has been considered   a methodologically attractive moment of the year   to examine children's request behaviour (particularly in   the case of toys). Christmas time is an icon of contemporary   commercial culture and a period in which kids may   openly express their desires of possession to adults-parents   or a symbolic figure such as Santa Claus in the case   of under 8-9 year-old kids (Otnes et al., 1994a; Pesci et al. 1997; Okleshen et al, 2001).</p>     <p>  The vast majority of the pieces of research examining   children's request at Christmas have focused on the   amount of things requested, the style of request and   the presence of brands in it, stressing the role of gender   as moderator of children's request behaviour (see for   example, Otnes et al., 1994a). In this context, it is paradoxical   that studies focusing on children have left the   examination of the role of age as a relatively underexplored   area, which is particularly clear in the case of   the style of the request and the presence of brands in it.   With the only exception of the seminal study of Caron   and Ward (1975) and other from Isler et al. (1987) more   than 20 years ago, there is no reported evidence about   the particular changes in kids' request associated with the variable age.</p>     <p>  Moreover, it is also important to note that all these studies   examining children's request at Christmas have been   carried out in developed countries such as the USA, New   Zealand and European ones. Therefore, there is no available   evidence from emerging economies -such as Latin-   American ones-, which have shown a powerful economic   growth and consumption patterns over the last decades (IMF, 2005).</p>     <p>  This article seeks to continue and expand this line of   research examining the nature of children's Christmas   request behaviour in the context of a Latin American   country -Chile. The focus of this analysis is the amount,   type, style and brand presence in children's Christmas   requests, which are separately explored as total prominence   of them, as well as the differential role of children's gender and age (Roedder, 1999).</p>      <p><font size="3"><b> The analysis of Children's Request Behaviour</b></font></p>     <p>  Since Christmas is a very significant moment of the year   in terms of children's consumption behaviour (Okleshen   et al., 2001), several studies have been carried out at that   point in time to examine two main areas. The first one   has evaluated the association between marketing actions   and children's requests. Departing from the fact that TV   advertising is the most important source of children's   consumption ideas (Caron &amp; Ward, 1975; Gunter et al.,   2005), scholars have examined the association between   Christmas request and advertising exposure. They have   consistently detected that age, and sometimes gender,   parental attitudes and mediation, and TV viewing patterns   are able to explain significant differences in the influence   that advertising has on children's requests (Pine &amp; Nash, 2002; Robertson and Rossiter, 1974, 1976; Valkenburg and Buijzen, 2000).</p>     <p>  The other relevant area of research on children consumption   at Christmas-which is the focus of this study-   is the analysis of the nature of children's requests.   In particular, these studies have mainly explored four   issues(<a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a02t1.jpg" target="_blank">see table 1</a>): (1) how many products children ask for, (2) the   type of gift requested, (3) the role played by brands in the request, and (4) the style of the request (Otnes et al.,   1994b). Usually, searchers have examined these four dimensions   in terms of the role of mediating variables such as children's gender and sometimes kids' age (Gunter &amp;   Furnham, 1998; Gunter et al., 2005; Valkenburg &amp; Cantor,   2001; Ward, 1974).</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>Characteristics of Children's Request</b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3"><b><i>  Amount of gifts requested by children</i></b></font></p>     <p>  The first relevant indicator of the nature of children's requests   behaviour is the amount of gifts that kids ask for   (Roedder, 1999). Regarding this issue, previous research   has yielded dissimilar findings, with an amount of gift   ranging from 3 to 7 per request (meaning letter). Findings   have tended to be steady across gender, but not   across age.</p>     <p>  A seminal study conducted in the USA by Caron and   Ward (1975) reported an average of 3.8 gifts per letter in   a sample of American middle-class children, with ages   between 9 and 12. They observed a significant decrease   in the number of gifts requested as children grow older   (they did not report gender differences), which is the only   evidence available about the actual differences across   age in kids' Christmas request. This finding provided   support to other studies about children's request carried   out in broader contexts. In this vein, a classical article   published by Isler and colleagues (1987) showed that-in   a common day-children from 3 to 4 years old asked for   an average of 24.9 products a day (including food, toys,   clothes, and other products). This figure decreased up to   13.3 items in the 5-to-6-year-old children and 10.4 products   in those aged between 9 and11 years old.</p>     <p>  In a subsequent study analysing letters to Santa -also carried   out in the USA- Richardson and Simpson (1982)   found a higher average of gifts mentioned in each note   (5.3) examining a sample of kids of ages from 5 to 10   years old. This piece of research also noticed a small but   not significant difference in the case of gender (an average   of 5.6 in the case of boys vs. 5.0 in the case of girls).   In these years, Bardbard and Parkman (1984) reported   another study with pre-school children (from 3 to 5 years   old). They found an average of 4 gifts per letter, detecting   no differences by gender in this age group.</p>     <p>  In the 90s, a classical investigation published by Otnes   and colleagues (1994a) detected the highest number of   gifts requested by children: 7.2 gifts per letter. These   scholars could not establish significant differences in the number of gifts asked for by boys and girls (they did not   report differences by age). In 1997, Pesci et al. reported   an average of 4.6 gifts per letter without differences according   the gender of children (they did not examine the   variable age).</p>     <p>  Evidence that is more recent comes from Pine and Nash   (2002). These authors examined the Christmas letters of   British and Swedish young children (5 to 6 year-olds).   They found that these European kids asked for an average   of about 5 gifts per letter. Simultaneous research   conducted in Australia (O'Cass and Clarke, 2002), examined   a sample of Christmas letters sent by children of   different ages. These authors detected an average of 4.1   gifts per request, with no significant differences between   boys and girls.</p>     <p>  In this context, the current study investigates how these   figures compare with a sample of letters written by Chilean   kids. Then a first Research question is posited:</p>     <p><i>  RQ1: How many Christmas gifts Chilean children request   in each letter?</i></p>     <p>  Additionally, in this paper we examine other two sub-research   questions asking for the role of gender and, particularly,   age as mediating variables in the number of gifts   requested by Chilean children. It is important to bear in   mind that previous research on Christmas request has   not fully examined the latter aspect; so, this study seeks   to provide more evidence that is robust, in this area:</p>     <p>  <i>RQ1a: Is there difference in the number of gifts requested by   boys and girls?</i></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  <i>RQ1b: Do the number of gifts requested change, as children   get older?</i></p>      <p><font size="3"><b><i>  Type of gift requested by children</i></b></font></p>     <p>  Another relevant aspect of children's request refers to   the type of gift. Exploring the postulates of several studies   about gender and children, authors have examined   how this variable is associated with the type of gift that   children ask for. In this vein, Richardson and Simpson   (1982) evaluated the incidence of masculine or feminine   request. On all age groups examined, these authors   reported that boys and girls tended to ask for different   kinds of gifts: toys like dolls (and their accessories), domestics,   educational art, or kitchen playsets in the case   of the girls versus vehicles, sports, racing cars, or action   figures in the case of boys. This finding was interpreted   as an indication of a feminine socialization oriented   towards the private, individual and domestic sphere as   opposed to the masculine one, more directed towards the   public space.</p>     <p>  Revisiting Richardson and Simpson's study (1982), Bradbard   and Parkman (1984) reported similar findings in   their study with pre-school children. They used a methodology   that divided kids' requests into 12 categories:   dolls, domestic items, dollhouses, educational-art materials,   musical items, spatial-temporal boys, sport equipment,   furniture, vehicles/machine, clothing/jewerly and   other. They observed that boys requested more items of   sports equipment and vehicles/machines. Girls, instead,   asked more frequently for dollhouses and accessories,   clothing/jewerly and dolls. Nevertheless, they do not detected   differences in other types of items such as educational   art material, toy animals and musical items.</p>     <p>  Based on the same principles, recent research conducted   by Pesci and colleagues (1997) has directly classified   kids' requests in terms of the gendered nature of them   (in a three-point scale as masculine, feminine or neutral).   Results showed that boys and girls tended to ask   for those gifts traditionally associated to its gender. In   fact, boys' requests were neutral toys (32%), masculine   toys (65%), and feminine toys (only 3%). Instead, girls   requested neutral toys (41%), masculine toys (13%),   and feminine toys (46%). Although this classification is   straightforward and intuitive, it omits that the gendertypicality   of many toys is not very clear.</p>     <p>  Thus, this piece of research examines the gendered nature   of gifts requested by Chilean children in terms of a   second research question:</p>     <p><i>  RQ2: Do Chilean boys and girls ask for toys typically associated   with the masculine and feminine sphere?</i></p>     <p>  Subsequently, it is important to determine whether age   is a relevant variable in the potential gendered nature   of children's request. Then we explore the following subresearch   question:</p>     <p><i>  RQ2a: Are there are differences in terms of the gendered nature   of gifts according to the variable age?</i></p>      <p><font size="3"><b><i>  The presence of brands in the request</i></b></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  Children can identify and use brands as a consumption   cue since they are 2 or 3 years old (Lindstrom &amp; Seybold,   2003). For that reason, previous research on children's   request has also focused on the role played by brands in   the request at Christmas. At this point, two main dimensions   in the analysis of this subject have been stressed:   (1) the presence of the brands and (2) the level of brand   loyalty in the request.</p>     <p>  Regarding the first issue, studies have reported a range   from 36 to 55% of requests incorporating brands, with   some studies revealing an absence of influence of the variable gender. Otnes et al. (1994b) observed in the USA   that over 50% of the gifts asked by children of different   ages explicitly incorporated a brand, with no significant   difference associated with the gender of children. In a   more recent piece of research, Pine and Nash (2002) reported   that European young children presented a lower   level of brand presence: an average of 38% (this study did   not examine the role of gender and age in the presence   of branded requests). Finally, O'Cass and Clarke (2002)-   examining a sample from Australia-found about 45% of   the requests containing a particular brand with no differences   by gender. It is interesting to note that there are   no studies examining the role of age in terms of the presence   of brands in children's Christmas request.</p>     <p>  Based on earlier studies, this article examines the presence   of brands in children's request in a sample of letters   written by Chilean kids:</p>     <p><i>  RQ3: What is the presence of branded request in the case of   Chilean children?</i></p>     <p>  Moreover, it is also explored the role of gender and age   in the presence of brands in the gift request, being the   latter a variable with no previous evidence reported in   the literature:</p>     <p><i>  RQ3a: Are there differences in the presence of brands in the   request according to the variable gender?</i></p>     <p>  <i>RQ3b: Are there differences in the presence of brands in the   request according to the variable age?</i></p>     <p>  The other relevant issue related to the relationship between   children's request and branding is the level of brand   loyalty. Previous studies (Otnes et al., 1994a; O'Cass &amp;   Clarke, 2002) have proposed a continuum that runs from   those petitions in which 100% of the request--no matter   the number of gifts-is branded (brand-fixated) to requests   in which the request includes two o more brands   mentioned equally (pluralistic) (see <a href="#t2">Table 2</a>).</p>     <p><a name="t2">&nbsp;</a></p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><img src="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t2.jpg"></center></p>     <p>Using this classification, Otnes and colleagues (1994a)   reported that-among those letters including at least one   branded gift-the most common pattern of brand loyalty   was "brand pluralistic", followed by "brand dominant".   That is to say, the analysis of brand loyalty showed that   the most frequent situation was the inclusion of two o   more brands in the request. Additionally, these authors   did not observe significant gender differences in this pattern   (they did not analyze the role played by age). On   the other hand, the aforementioned study of O'Cass   and Clarke (2002) detected a slightly different pattern.   Although the most common form of brand loyalty was   also "pluralistic" (same as Otnes and colleagues), the second   most frequent was "singular brand". In other words,   children from Australia showed a lower level of brand   loyalty than American ones. Additionally, when examining   potential gender differences, they detected no significant   divergences between boys and girls (they did not report results by age).</p>     <p>  In this area, this article explores the patterns of brand   loyalty in a sample of Christmas letters written by Chilean children:</p>     <p><i>  RQ4: What are the most frequent patterns of brand loyalty among Chilean children?</i></p>     <p>  Children's brand loyalty is also explored in terms of the role of gender and age in two sub-research questions:</p>     <p><i>  RQ4a: Are there differences in the most frequent patterns of brand loyalty according to the variable gender?</i></p>     <p>  <i>RQ4b: Are there differences in the most frequent patterns of brand loyalty according to the variable age?</i></p>      <p><font size="3"><b><i>  The style of the request</i></b></font></p>     <p>  The style of the request is another relevant way to examine   children&acute;s letter to Santa. In this vein, previous research   has defined <i>politeness</i> and <i>indirectness</i> as the two   main dimensions to examine this issue, which have only   been examined as total and by gender. The former, defined   as the group of rules about how the others have   to be treated, has been repeatedly mentioned as one of   the critical factors in the strategies of children persuasion   (Blum-Kulka, 1997). In this issue, O'Cass and Clarke   (2002) showed that 27.5% of the letters had courtesy   elements (such as "how are you", "thanks", or "please").   Examining whether the variable gender could be a significant   moderator of politeness, it was detected that girls   used more frequently this element than boys did (32%   versus 21%). This result was not consistent with the previous   findings of Otnes and colleagues (1994b), which did not detected differences between boys and girls.</p>     <p>  The use of indirect forms of request ("I would like...", "could you...") has been the other element used to examine children letters to Santa. The abovementioned study of O'Cass and Clarke (2002) detected that indirect request was massively used by Australian children (75% of the letters). Regarding the variable gender, Otnes et al. (1994b) detected an absence of significant differences in the use of this strategy, which was not supported by the study of O'Cass and Clarke (2002): girls tended to use indirect statements more frequently (81.9% versus 66.5% of the letters).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  These elements lead one to formulate a final set of research   questions:</p>     <p><i>  RQ5: How prominent is the use of polite and indirect requests   in this sample?</i></p>     <p>  This research question is explored in terms of the role of   gender and age through two sub-research questions:</p>     <p>  <i>RQ5a: Are there differences in the presence of polite and indirect   requests according to the variable gender?</i></p>     <p>  <i>RQ5b: Are there differences in the presence of polite and indirect   requests according to the variable age?</i></p>      <p><font size="3"><b>  Method</b></font></p>     <p>  This study reports a quantitative content analysis of 500   letters addressed to Santa Claus sent through the Chilean   postal service (Correos de Chile) during the four   weeks prior to Christmas 2004. This technique of data   analysis was chosen because it represents a replicable and   systematic method to describe the manifest content of   communication messages (Berelson, 1952; Riffe et al.,   1998). Additionally, this is the technique used on previous   studies examining the same issue (among others,   Caron &amp; Ward, 1975; Richardson &amp; Simpson, 1982; Otnes   et al.1994a; 1994b; O'Cass and Clarke, 2002; Pine &amp;   Nash, 2002), which provides a basic level of comparability   for the results here yielded.</p>     <p>  Regarding to the sampling procedure, it is important to   note that Chilean Post allowed the researchers to select   10% of the letters to Santa received each day in order to   be photocopied (and then returned)<a href="#1" name="s1">&#91;1&#93;</a>. Then a sample of   10% (N = 500) of the total number of letters to Santa Claus received (Correos de Chile, 2004) was incorporated   in the study. Subsequently, 122 letters were eliminated   from further analysis for any or several of the following   reasons (see Otnes et al, 1994a):</p> <ol type="1">       <p>    <li>  The senders did not include their name and/or age.   The reason for this was that these elements allowed   the researchers to determine author&acute;s gender and age   (86 letters).</li></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <li>  The letter asked for generic gifts ("I want as many   gifts as you can give me") or altruist wishes ("I wish   peace in the world"), because they cannot be considered   properly as consumption requests (18 letters).</li></p>     <p>    <li>  Children did not write them ("I write to you on behalf   of my 8 month old baby") or letters included   adult gifts (35 letters).</li></p>     <p>    <li>  Handwriting was illegible and then the content could   not be understood (2 letters).</li></p>     </ol>       <p>  Thus, this study examined a final sample of 378 letters   (see <a href="#t3">Table 3</a>). They were written by a similar number of   boys and girls (48.5% versus 51.5%), and an equivalent   number of children in each age group (under 7, 8-10 and   over 11 year old). Among those mentioning the address   (85%), the sample belonged mainly to low income (87%)   and urban zones of the country (98%) according to the   classification of Chilean Market Research Association   (Adimark, 2002).</p>     <p><a name="t3">&nbsp;</a></p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><img src="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t3.jpg"></center></p>     <p>The content of the letters was examined through of a   group of codes compiled from earlier studies on children's   request and adapted to the case of a Latin American country (<a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03anx.jpg" target="_blank">see Annex</a>). In order to ensure the reliability of the study, 7.5% of the sample (N = 30) was examined by a both coders (coders were undergraduate business students, with previous experience in content analysis). Then, the inter-coder agreement was computed according to Scot's Pi formula, showing a result over 0.8 across all the categories used in this study, which exceeds the minimum accepted to be included in the final data analysis (Riffe et al., 1998). Then, data was statistically examined (using T test and crosstabulation) to analyze the set of research questions (RQ) included in this paper.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>Results</b></font></p>     <p><font size="3"><b><i>  The amount of gifts</i></b></font></p>     <p>  The first RQ asked for the number of gifts per request   (<a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t4.jpg" target="_blank">Table 4</a>). Results showed an average of 2.1 gifts per   letter, with a statistical mode of 2. Further analyses by   gender (RQ1a) detected a slight but not statistically significant   difference between boys and girls. In fact, rhe results   of the t-test revealed that there were no significant   differences between the mean of gift requested by males   and females as total and across all the age groups examined.   On the other hand, the examination of the role of   the variable "age" (RQ1b) indicated that younger children   requested, in average, more gifts than older ones. In effect, 5-to-7 year old children requested significantly   more gifts than 8-to-10 (t = 2,874, df = 291, p&lt;0,005)   and 11-to-13 kids (t = 3,353, df = 218,p&lt;0,001). The   same situation was detected in the comparison between   the older groups where children between 11 and 13 years   old requested less gifts than those between 8 and 10 (t =   2,452, df = 241, p&lt;0,05).</p>     <p>  Examining the level of dispersion. Ii is interesting to note   that it tends to decrease as children mature. In fact, under-7-year-old children asked for a range between 1 to 5   gifts. The maximum number decreased up to 4 in the   case of 8-10 kids and up to 3 in those children between   11 and 13 years old.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>  <i>The type of gifts requested</i> &#91;T3&#93;</b></font></p>     <p>  The second area of analysis (RQ2) examined the genderspecific   nature of requested gifts (<a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t5.jpg" target="_blank">Table 5</a>). In order to do that, this study employed the classification of Blakemore   and Centers (2005), which allows one to subdivide children   requests into five subcategories: strongly masculine,   moderately masculine, neutral, moderately feminine, and   strongly feminine.</p>     <p>  Findings show that girls and boys ask for those gifts associated   to their gender (RQ2). Concretely, boys tended to   massively ask for <i>masculine gifts</i> (63%) and girls did the   same for <i>feminine gifts</i> (56%). Crosstabulations showed   no differences between the distribution of the type of   gifts according to the variable gender (x2 = 9.088, df =   6, p = 019). That is to say, in both cases the same tendency   is detected.</p>     <p>  A separate analysis by age (RQ2a) detected a significant   influence of this variable in the request (x2 = 44.312,   df = 7, p&lt;0,001). Figures show that as children mature,   a lower presence of gifts strongly and moderately associated   with their gender is detected. In this vein, the oldest   group depicted the highest presence of neutral requests   and those moderately associated to the other gender (see   <a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t5.jpg" target="_blank">Table 5</a>).</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3"><b>  <i>The relationship between children and brands</i></b></font></p>     <p>  <font size="3"><i>The request for branded gifts</i></font></p>     <p>  The percentage of branded requests (RQ3) reached   35.3% (0.9 brands per letter). Further analyses examined   whether this figure was associated with the variables   gender and age. Regarding the differences by gender   (RQ3a), girls show a higher percentage of branded requests   than boys did: 39.3% versus 31.8% (x2 = 29.088,   df = 9, p&lt;0,001). In terms on the average of brands, girls   asked for 1.16 brands, and boys for 0.77, which depicts a   statistical mean difference (t = 3,04, df = 376, 0,001).</p>     <p>  The variable age (RQ3b) was also significant (x2 =   56.741, df = 9, p&lt;0,001): results depicted a decrease in   the incorporation of brands, as children grow older: 42   % in the youngest age group (under 7 years old), 35.6 %   in the intermediate group (8 to 10 years-old) and 23.5 %   in the oldest one (11 years-old and older). In terms of the   average of brands per letter, the youngest group asked for   1.17 brands per letter versus the 8-to-10 group that requested   9.6 brands per letter (t = 2,13, df = 291, 0,005).   Finally, the oldest groups asked for 0.41 brands per letter,   which is also significantly different to the intermediate   group (t = 3,946, df = 218, p = 0,001) and the youngest   one (t = 4,938, df = 241, p = 0,001).</p>      <p><font size="3"><i>  Patterns of brand loyalty</i></font></p>     <p>  Brand loyalty was analyzed in terms of a classification   proposed by Otnes et al. (1994a), which incorporates the   different possible combinations of brand presence in the   request (RQ4). The two most common styles of requests   have in common the presence of only one brand, rather   than two or more as reported by previous studies (Otnes   et al., 1994a; O'Cass and Clarke, 2002). In fact, the   patterns detected in this study revealed "brand fixated"   (43%) is the most common request style in this sample   (see <a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t6.jpg" target="_blank">Table 6</a>). Those showing the "singularly branded"   pattern follow it (38.7%). It is interesting to note that   60.3% of the users of this pattern asked for 3 or more   gifts (over the average) and 29.1% of those requesting 1   or 2 gifts. That is, singularly branded request was also   part of those letters with high number of requests (<a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t6.jpg" target="_blank">Table   6</a>).</p>     <p>  Further analyses examined the influence of children's   gender and age in the pattern of brand loyalty. Regarding   the former (RQ4a), crosstabulations revealed significant   differences between boys and girls in terms of the style of brand request (x2 = 34.512, df = 9, p&lt;0,001). In fact,   girls mainly used both "brand-fixated" and "singularlybranded"   requests (43.5%). In the case of boys, however,   "brand- fixated" (44.7%) is the dominant pattern. "Singularly-   branded" requests are in the second place, with   lower presence (27.6%). Finally, in terms of the variable   age (RQ4b), it was also significantly associated with the   pattern of brand loyalty in the request (x2 = 47.139, df   = 9, p&lt;0,001). It is interesting to notice that the "brandfixated"   request is considerably less found in the group of   children over 11 years old, in which the "singularly-branded"   request pattern becomes more prominent (<a href="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t6.jpg" target="_blank">Table 6</a>).</p>      <p><font size="3"><b><i>  The style of the request</i></b></font></p>     <p>  The presence of courtesy elements is about 30% of the   letters, with an average of 0.39 courtesy elements per letter.   In terms of the role of gender, the average of polite   elements was similar between boys and girls. Instead, the   examination by age showed significant differences (X2   = 6.971, df = 5, p&gt;0.05). Figures show that 12.6% of the   letters written by 5-to-7-year-old children incorporated   polite elements, which rose up to 33.7% in the case of   8-to-10 kids, and up to 46.4% in the oldest group. That   is to say, as children mature they tend to use more frequently   polite elements in the request (see <a href="#t7">Table 7</a>).</p>     <p><a name="t7">&nbsp;</a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/inno/v19n35/35a03t7.jpg"></center></p>     <p>In terms of the use of indirect request was in 23.6% of the   letters. Again, the variable gender was not significant as   source of differences in the use of this element. Nevertheless,   the use of indirect requests was different according   the variable age (X2 = 15.347, df = 5, p&gt;0.001).   Figures depicted that those children aged 5-7 had the   lower use of indirect elements (13.9%). Then an increase   of about 30% is observed in both the 8-to-10 and 11-to- 13 groups.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>  Conclusions</b></font></p>     <p>  This study analyzed a Chilean sample of children's letters   to Santa Claus in terms of the amount, gendered, branded   nature and style of children's consumption request   at Christmas. The analysis focused on the sex and age   of children, being the later variable particularly relevant   because of its underdevelopment in the field of both the branded character and style of the request.</p>     <p>  A first important finding referred to the small amount   of gifts requested in each letter analyzed: 2.1. Previous   studies carried out in developed countries had detected   an amount of requests ranging from 3 to 7 gifts per letter.   Although there is no clear explanation for this difference,   presumably this result can be related with a particularity   of this sample: selected from an emerging economy   (instead of developed country) and dominated by letters   from poor backgrounds. Given this, it is possible to hypothesize   that poverty imposes an environment dominated   by certain limitations in the access to consumption,   which would make a very long list of gifts irrelevant (Hill and Stephens, 1997).</p>     <p>  In terms of the role played by children's gender and age in   the number of gifts requested, findings showed that age   was significant in terms of explaining differences among   children. This finding reinforces the idea of a changing   relationship with consumption as children grow older,   which is a basic assumption of the theories of consumer   socialization (Valkenburg &amp; Cantor, 2001). Contrarily,   gender socialization seems not to play any significant role   in the quantity of the request, which is also consistent   with previous evidence in the literature (Roedder, 1999; Gunter &amp; Furnham, 1998).</p>     <p>  A second examination of this study refers to the gendered   nature of the request. Broadly speaking, the results   reported in this paper support the idea that boys and girls   tend to ask for those products associated with their gender   role (about 60% of the requests). Nevertheless, it is   interesting to notice a new finding. This tendency is less   pronounced, as children get older. In fact, the 11-yearold   group has the highest level of the neutral-gift request   and the lowest levels of gendered request. It is important   to be cautious with the interpretation of these findings,   because they could be covering a potential change in the   quality of gifts when children mature: from toys and games   to other "non-gendered" things such as clothes and electronic devices (Fisher &amp; Arnold, 1990).</p>     <p>  Regarding the presence of brands, Chilean figures (35%   of requests and 0.9 brands per letter) are in the lower   range reported by previous studies (36% to 55%). Consistently,   the analysis of brand loyalty shows dominant   patterns of "brand-fixated" and "singularly branded"   requests, which also demonstrate the lower presence of   brands in comparison with other studies (dominated by "pluralistic" requests). Together, these results seem to demonstrate that brands would have lower quantitative prominence in the Chilean sample, which could also be related to the place in which this study was carried out: an emerging economy (in comparison to developedcountry kids).</p>     <p>  Contrarily to previous evidence, this study detected   significant differences between boys and girls in terms   of the presence of brands. Girls also tended to include   more "singularly-branded" requests than boys did. It   could show a more flexible (or less loyal) incorporation of brands in the case of girls (Otnes et al. (1994b).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>  In terms of age, findings point out that younger children   tend to request more branded gifts than older ones. In   terms of the brand loyalty pattern of the request, "brandfixated"   request was less frequently used, as children grow   older. In this sense, as children mature, they use brands   in a more flexible-indicating less loyal-way (Gunter et al., 2005; Roedder, 1999).</p>     <p>  Finally, this study examined the style of request. On the   one hand, the presence of polite elements was about 30%,   which is the same level reported by previous literature.   However, the presence of indirect request was lower than   previous research: about 23% versus 75% in previous studies   (O'Cass and Clarke, 2002). Tentative explanation   for this difference with previous evidence is possible to   find in the poor background of the sample, which has received an education of low quality (Perez-Arce, 1999).</p>     <p>  In terms of the presence of gender, in both cases this   variable did not show significant differences, which provided   support to those results reported by O'Cass and   Clarke (2002) but not to Otnes et al. (1994b) study. In   the case of the role of age (a variable that literature had   not previously examined), this study showed that the use   of polite and indirect elements increased as children matured.   Nevertheless, a difference was detected between   both variables. Polite elements increased in the three age   groups examined, but the use of indirect request only depicted   a rise between under-7 and 8-to-10 children. This   finding highlights the relevance of the variable age in   the case of the style of consumer argumentation, which   literature from other context -such as conflict resolution   and education- had already stressed (see, for example, Bearison and Gass, 1979; Eisenbrg &amp; Garvey, 1981).</p>     <p>  All in all, these results show that gender and age are relevant   factors to understand children's request. Across all   the indicators, age produced significant differences in the   sample examined. This result underlines the relevance of   this factor to explain the differences in the consumers as   consumer socialization literature has largely mentioned   (Roedder, 1999). Similarly, gender was also associated   with significant differences in many of the variables examined   (the exceptions were the amount of gifts and the   style of request). This finding also highlights the relevance   of studying this variable as predictor of divergences in   the development of children as consumers (Gunter and Furnham, 1999).</p>     <p>  On the other hand, brands demonstrated a significant   role in the request. This finding emphasises the relevance   of brands from early childhood as previous literature   about children <i>branding</i> has largely described it. (Achenreiner &amp; Roedder, 2003; Lyndstrom &amp; Seybold, 2003). This fact provides new evidence about the relevance (recognition and awareness) of brands in the context of a Latin American country, as well as the role played by age and gender in this process.</p>     <p>  It is important to mention some limitations of this piece   of research. First, the size of the sample stresses the tentative   character of the results. In spite of representing a   relatively large number of letters, it does not mean that   results can be necessarily generalized. More research is   needed in order to establish if the tendencies observed in   this study are constant patterns, or they are affected by   other elements such as the social, cultural or geographic   characteristics of this sample.</p>      <p><font size="3"><b>Pie de p&aacute;gina</b></font></p>     <p><a href="#s1" name="1">&#91;1&#93;</a> In Chile, children's letters to Santa are available in the main building of the Chilean Post for everyone who wants to read them and eventually send back a gift to the sender of the letter </p>      <p><font size="3"><b>References</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Adimark. (2002). <i>Mapa socioecon&oacute;mico de Chile</i>. Santiago: Adimark&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Bardbard, M.R. &amp; Parkman, S.A. (1984).   Gender differences in preschool   children's toy. <i>The Journal of genetic psychology</i>,   <i>145</i>(2), 283-284.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000143&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Bearison, D.J. &amp; Gass, S.T. (1979). Hypothetical   and practical reasoning:   Children's persuasive appeals in different   social context. <i>Child Development</i>,   <i>50</i>, 901-903.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Berelson, B. (1952). <i>Content analysis in communication   research</i>. New York: Free Press.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000147&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="verdana">  Blakemore, J.E.O. &amp; Centers, R. (2005).   Characteristics of Boys' and Girls' Toys.   <i>Sex Roles</i>, <i>59</i>, 619-633.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000149&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p> <font size="2" face="verdana">    <!-- ref --><p>  Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness   in requests: Same or different.   <i>Journal of Pragmatics</i>, <i>11</i>, 131-46.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000151&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>  Caron, A. &amp; Ward, S. (1975). Gift decisions   by kids and parents. <i>Journal of Advertising</i>,   <i>15</i>(4), 12-20.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000153&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Cotte, J. &amp; Wood, S.L. (2004). Families and   innovative consumer behavior: A triadic   analysis of sibling and parental influence.   <i>Journal of Consumer Research</i>,   <i>31</i>(1), 78-86.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000155&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Eisenber, A.R. &amp; Garvey, C. (1981).   Children's use of verbal strategies n resolving   conflicts. <i>Discourse Processes</i>, <i>4</i>, 149-170.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000157&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Fisher, E. &amp; Arnold, S.J. (1990). Sex, gender   identity, gender role attitudes, and consumer   behaviour. <i>Journal of Psychology &amp; Marketing</i>, <i>11</i>(2), 163-182.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000159&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Gunter, B. &amp; Furnham, A. (1998). <i>Children as consumers</i>. London: Routledge.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000161&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>  Gunter, B., Blades, M. &amp; Oates, C. (2005).   <i>Advertising to children on TV: Content,   impact and regulation</i>. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000163&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Hill, R. &amp; Stephens, D. (1997). Impoverished   consumers and consumer behavior:   The Case of AFDC Mothers. <i>Journal of Macromarketing</i>, <i>17</i>, 32-48.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000165&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="verdana">  Dotson, M. &amp; Hyatt, E. (2005). Major influence   factors in children's consumer   socialization. <i>Journal of Consumer Marketing</i>,   <i>22</i>(1), 35-42.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000167&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p> <font size="2" face="verdana">     <!-- ref --><p>  IMF. (2005). <i>International Monetary Fund,   World Economic Outlook</i>. Washington D.C.: IMF Publications   Services.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000169&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>    <!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="verdana">  Isler, L., Popper, E.T. &amp; Ward, S. (1987).   Children's purchase requests and parental   responses: Results from a Diary   Study. <i>Journal of Advertising Research</i>,   <i>27</i>(5), 28-39.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000171&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p> <font size="2" face="verdana">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>  Jason, L.E., Ponder, N., Beatty, S. &amp; Capella,   M. (2006). Teenagers' use of alternative   shopping channels: A consumer socialization   perspective. <i>Journal of Retailing</i>,   <i>82</i>(2), 137-53.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000173&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Lee, C.K.C. &amp; Beatty, S.E. (2002). Family   structure and influence in family decision   making. <i>Journal of Consumer Marketing</i>,   <i>19</i>(1), 24-41.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000175&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Lindstrom, M. &amp; Seybold, P. (2003). <i>Brandchild.   Remarkable insights into the minds   of today's global kids and their relationships with brand</i>. London: Kogan-Page.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000177&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  O'Cass, A. &amp; Clarke, P. (2002). Dear Santa   do you have my brand? A study of   the brand requests, awareness and request   styles at Christmas time. <i>Journal of Consumer Behaviour</i>, <i>2</i>(1), 37-53.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000179&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Okleshen, C., Baker, S. &amp; Mittelstaedt, R.   (2001). Santa Claus does more than deliver   toys: Advertising's commercialization   of the collective memory of Americans.   <i>Journal of Consumption, Markets &amp; Culture</i>, <i>4</i>(3), 207-240.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000181&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="verdana">  Otnes, C., Kim, Y.C. &amp; Kim, K. (1994a). All   I Want for Christmas: An analysis   of children's brand requests to Santa   Claus. <i>Journal of Popular Culture</i>, <i>27</i>(4),   183-193.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000183&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p> <font size="2" face="verdana">    <!-- ref --><p>  Otnes, C., Kim, Y.C. &amp; Kim, K. (1994b). Yes,   Virginia, there is a gender difference.   Analyzing children request to Santa   Claus. <i>Journal of Popular Culture</i>, <i>28</i>(1),   17-29.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000185&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  P&eacute;rez-Arce, P. (1999). The influence of culture   on cognition. <i>Archives of Clinical   Neuropsychology</i>, <i>14</i>, 581-592.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000187&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Pesci, F., Reilley, S.P., Bailey, S.T., Little, L.,   Staehling, D., &amp; Lansky, L. (1997). <i>Psychologists   at the North Pole: Content   analysis of letters to Santa Claus</i>. Poster   session presented at the 9th Annual   Meeting of the American Psychological   Society, Washington, D.C.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000189&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Pine, K.J. &amp; Nash, A. (2002). Dear Santa:   The effects of television advertising   on young children. <i>International Journal   of Behavioural Development</i>, <i>26</i>(6),   529-539.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000191&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>  Richardson, J. G. &amp; Simpson, C. H. (1982).   Children, gender, and social Structure:   An analysis of the contents of letters   to Santa Claus. <i>Child Development</i>,   <i>53</i>, 429-436.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000193&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Riffe, D., Lacy, S. &amp; Fico, F.G. (1998). <i>Analysing   media messages. Using quantitative   content analysis in research</i>. Hillsdale,   N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000195&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Robertson, T. &amp; Rossiter, J. (1974). Children   and commercial persuasion: An attribution   theory analysis. <i>Journal of Consumer   Research</i>, <i>1</i>(1), 3-20.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000197&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Robertson, T. &amp; Rossiter, J. (1976). Short-run   advertising effects on children: A field   study. <i>Journal of Marketing Research</i>,   <i>13</i>(1), 68-70.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000199&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Roedder, D. (1999). Consumer socialization   of children: A retrospective look at   twenty-five years of research. <i>Journal of   Consumer Research</i>, <i>26</i>(1), 183-213.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000201&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>  Tinson, J., Nancarrow, C. &amp; Brace, I. (2008).   Purchase decision making and the increasing   significance of family types.   <i>Journal of Consumer Marketing</i>, <i>25</i>(1),   45-56.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000203&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Valkenburg, P. M. &amp; Buijzen, M. (2000).   The impact of television advertising on   children's Christmas wishes. <i>Journal of   Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media</i>, <i>44</i>(3),   456-470.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000205&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Valkenburg, P. M. &amp; Cantor J. (2001). The   development of a child into a consumer.   <i>Applied Developmental Psychology</i>,   <i>22</i>(1), 61-72.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000207&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Vered, K.O. (1998). Blue group boys play incredible   machine; girls play hopscotch:   Social discourse and gendered play at   computer. In J. Sefton-Green (ed.), <i>Digital   Diversion: Youth Culture in the Age   of Multimedia</i> (pp. 43-61). London:   UCL Press.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000209&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>     <!-- ref --><p>  Viswanathan, M., Childers, T. &amp; Moore, E.   (2000). The Measurement of Intergenerational   Communication and Influence   on Consumption: Development, Validation,   and Cross-Cultural Comparison   of the IGEN. <i>Journal of the Academy   of Marketing Science</i>, <i>28</i>(3), 406-424.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000211&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300036&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p> </font>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="verdana">  Ward, S. (1974). Consumer socialization.   <i>Journal of Consumer Research</i>, <i>1</i>(1), 1-16.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000213&pid=S0121-5051200900030000300037&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>       ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Adimark</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Mapa socioeconómico de Chile]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santiago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Adimark]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bardbard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parkman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gender differences in preschool children's toy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of genetic psychology]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>145</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>283-284</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bearison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Hypothetical and practical reasoning: Children's persuasive appeals in different social context]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Child Development]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>901-903</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Content analysis in communication research]]></source>
<year>1952</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Free Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blakemore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.E.O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Centers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Characteristics of Boys' and Girls' Toys]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sex Roles]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<page-range>619-633</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blum-Kulka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Pragmatics]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>131-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ward]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gift decisions by kids and parents]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Advertising]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>12-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cotte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Families and innovative consumer behavior: A triadic analysis of sibling and parental influence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Research]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>78-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eisenber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garvey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Children's use of verbal strategies n resolving conflicts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Discourse Processes]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>149-170</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fisher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arnold]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Sex, gender identity, gender role attitudes, and consumer behaviour]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Psychology & Marketing]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>163-182</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gunter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Furnham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Children as consumers]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gunter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blades]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oates]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Advertising to children on TV: Content, impact and regulation]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Mahwah^eNJ NJ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stephens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Impoverished consumers and consumer behavior: The Case of AFDC Mothers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Macromarketing]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>32-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dotson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hyatt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Major influence factors in children's consumer socialization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Marketing]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>35-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>IMF.</collab>
<source><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund: World Economic Outlook]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington D.C. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[IMF Publications Services]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Isler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Popper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ward]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Children's purchase requests and parental responses: Results from a Diary Study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Advertising Research]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>28-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jason]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ponder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beatty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Capella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Teenagers' use of alternative shopping channels: A consumer socialization perspective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Retailing]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>137-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.K.C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beatty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Family structure and influence in family decision making]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Marketing]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>24-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lindstrom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seybold]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Brandchild: Remarkable insights into the minds of today's global kids and their relationships with brand]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kogan-Page]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O'Cass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clarke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Dear Santa do you have my brand?: A study of the brand requests, awareness and request styles at Christmas time]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Behaviour]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>37-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Okleshen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mittelstaedt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Santa Claus does more than deliver toys: Advertising's commercialization of the collective memory of Americans]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumption, Markets & Culture]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>207-240</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Otnes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[All I Want for Christmas: An analysis of children's brand requests to Santa Claus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Popular Culture]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>183-193</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Otnes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Yes, Virginia, there is a gender difference: Analyzing children request to Santa Claus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Popular Culture]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<month>b</month>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>17-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez-Arce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The influence of culture on cognition]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<page-range>581-592</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pesci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reilley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bailey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Little]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Staehling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lansky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Psychologists at the North Pole: Content analysis of letters to Santa Claus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[9 Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Washington, D.C </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nash]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Dear Santa: The effects of television advertising on young children]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Behavioural Development]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>529-539</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richardson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simpson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Children, gender, and social Structure: An analysis of the contents of letters to Santa Claus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Child Development]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>429-436</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Riffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lacy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fico]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Analysing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hillsdale^eN.J. N.J.]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robertson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rossiter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Children and commercial persuasion: An attribution theory analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Research]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robertson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rossiter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Short-run advertising effects on children: A field study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Marketing Research]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>68-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roedder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Research]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>183-213</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nancarrow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brace]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Purchase decision making and the increasing significance of family types]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Marketing]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>45-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valkenburg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buijzen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The impact of television advertising on children's Christmas wishes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>456-470</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valkenburg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. M. & Cantor J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The development of a child into a consumer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Applied Developmental Psychology]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>61-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vered]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Blue group boys play incredible machine; girls play hopscotch: Social discourse and gendered play at computer]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sefton-Green]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Digital Diversion: Youth Culture in the Age of Multimedia]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>43-61</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UCL Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Viswanathan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Childers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Measurement of Intergenerational Communication and Influence on Consumption: Development, Validation, and Cross-Cultural Comparison of the IGEN]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>406-424</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ward]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Consumer socialization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Research]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
