<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0122-0268</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista MVZ Córdoba]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev.MVZ Cordoba]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0122-0268</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Córdoba - Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0122-02682007000100002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINATION OF PLASMA CORTISOL IN FISH USING COMPETITIVE ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (ELISA)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[METODOLOGÍA PARA LA DETERMINACIÓN DE CORTISOL PLASMÁTICO EN PECES USANDO LA PRUEBA DE INMUNOENSAYO ENZIMÁTICO (ELISA)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velasco-Santamaría1]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Yohana]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cruz-Casallas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pablo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of Plymouth  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>United Kingdom</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de los Llanos Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Recursos Naturales Instituto de Acuicultura]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Villavicencio Meta]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2007</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2007</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>869</fpage>
<lpage>877</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0122-02682007000100002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0122-02682007000100002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0122-02682007000100002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Objective. To determine plasma cortisol procedure in fish using competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Materials and methods. Two plasma samples of juveniles rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss were analized by using ELISA human kit for cortisol assay. For standard curve calibration seven standard solutions of cortisol in human plasma (0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ng.ml-1) were used. For the recovery test 50, 100 and 200 ng.ml-1 standard solutions of cortisol were used; for the linearity test four dilutions of the fish plasma samples (1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and 1/16) were prepared. To each well fish plasma samples and standard solutions were added and its content were conjugated to peroxidase and subsequently enzyme substrate was added. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by addition of phosphoric acid 0.5 M and the absorbance was read at 450 nm. The accuracy of the pipetting procedure was assessed previously. The recovery and linearity percentages, the standard curve and parallelism were determined. Results. The standard curve showed a high correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.998). The cortisol concentration of two samples fluctuated between 64 and 72 ng.ml-1. Only the 200 ng.ml-1 standard solution showed a recovery percentage superior to 80%; in contrast, in 50 and 100 ng.ml-1 the recovery percentage fluctuated between 52 and 71%. In the dilution of 1/2 to 1/8 were observed a good linearity (86 to 168%); the samples showed parallelism with the standard curve. Conclusions. The use of human plasma cortisol for ELISA procedure is an accuracy and efficiency test for fish cortisol plasma determination.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Objetivo. Describir el procedimiento para determinar cortisol plasmático en peces, utilizando la prueba de inmunoensayo enzimático (ELISA). Materiales y métodos. Dos muestras de plasma de trucha arco iris Oncorhynchus mykiss fueron analizadas empleando un kit de ELISA desarrollado para humanos. Siete soluciones estándar conteniendo 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400 y 800 ng.ml-1 de cortisol fueron usadas para construir una curva de calibración. Para la prueba de recuperación se emplearon las soluciones estándar de 50, 100 y 200 ng.ml-1; finalmente, para la prueba de linealidad se prepararon cuatro diluciones de las muestras de plasma, así: 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 y 1/16. A cada pozo de la placa se adicionaron tanto las muestras de plasma como las soluciones estándar, las cuales fueron conjugadas con peroxidasa y posteriormente se adicionó el substrato de la enzima. Esta reacción enzimática se detuvo por medio de la adición de ácido fosfórico (0.5 M) y posteriormente, la absorbancia fue medida a 450 nm. La precisión del procedimiento de pipetaje fue evaluado previo a la prueba. El porcentaje de recuperación y de linealidad, así como la curva de calibración y de paralelismo fueron determinadas. Resultados. La curva estándar mostró un alto coeficiente de correlación (r2 = 0.998). La concentración de cortisol en las dos muestras de plasma fluctuó entre 64 y 72 ng.ml-1. Sólo la solución estándar de 200 ng.ml-1 mostró un porcentaje de recuperación superior al 80%; en contraste, en las soluciones estándar de 50 y 100 ng.ml-1 el porcentaje de recuperación fluctuó entre 52 y 71%. En las diluciones de 1/2 y 1/8 se observó un buen porcentaje de linealidad (86 a 168%). Finalmente, las muestras mostraron cierto grado de paralelismo con la curva estándar. Conclusiones. El uso de la prueba de ELISA para determinar cortisol plasmático en humanos, es confiable y eficiente para la cuantificación de cortisol plasmático en peces.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cortisol]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[ELISA]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fish]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Oncorhynchus mykiss]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[rainbow trout]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[plasma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cortisol]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ELISA]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Oncorhynchus mykiss]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[peces]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[trucha arco iris]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[plasma]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[   <font face="verdana" size="2">     <p align="right">ORIGINALES</p>     <p align="center"><b><font size="3">METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINATION OF PLASMA CORTISOL    IN FISH USING COMPETITIVE ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (ELISA) </font></b></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><font size="3"><b>METODOLOG&Iacute;A PARA LA DETERMINACI&Oacute;N    DE CORTISOL PLASM&Aacute;TICO EN PECES USANDO LA PRUEBA DE INMUNOENSAYO ENZIM&Aacute;TICO    (ELISA)</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Yohana Velasco-Santamar&iacute;a1*, M.Sc, Pablo Cruz-Casallas2, Ph.D</b></p>     <p>MRes student, University of Plymouth, Dake Circus Plymouth Devon, PL4 8AA,    United Kingdom1. Instituto de Acuicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias    y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de los Llanos, Villavicencio (Meta) Colombia2.    Grupo de Investigaci&oacute;n sobre Reproducci&oacute;n y Toxicolog&iacute;a    de Organismos Acu&aacute;ticos - GRITOX. *Correspondence: E-mail:<a href="ymvelasco@yahoo.com">ymvelasco@yahoo.com</a>.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr size="1">     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Objective</b>. To determine plasma cortisol procedure in fish using competitive    enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Materials and methods. Two plasma    samples of juveniles rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss were analized by using    ELISA human kit for cortisol assay. For standard curve calibration seven standard    solutions of cortisol in human plasma (0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup>)    were used. For the recovery test 50, 100 and 200 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> standard solutions    of cortisol were used; for the linearity test four dilutions of the fish plasma    samples (1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and 1/16) were prepared. To each well fish plasma samples    and standard solutions were added and its content were conjugated to peroxidase    and subsequently enzyme substrate was added. The enzymatic reaction was stopped    by addition of phosphoric acid 0.5 M and the absorbance was read at 450 nm.    The accuracy of the pipetting procedure was assessed previously. The recovery    and linearity percentages, the standard curve and parallelism were determined.    <b>Results</b>. The standard curve showed a high correlation coefficient (r2    = 0.998). The cortisol concentration of two samples fluctuated between 64 and    72 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup>. Only the 200 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> standard solution showed a recovery percentage    superior to 80%; in contrast, in 50 and 100 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> the recovery percentage    fluctuated between 52 and 71%. In the dilution of 1/2 to 1/8 were observed a    good linearity (86 to 168%); the samples showed parallelism with the standard    curve. <b>Conclusions</b>. The use of human plasma cortisol for ELISA procedure    is an accuracy and efficiency test for fish cortisol plasma determination.</p>     <p><b>Key words</b>: Cortisol, ELISA, fish, Oncorhynchus mykiss, rainbow trout,    plasma.</p>  <hr size="1">      <p> <b>RESUMEN</b> </p>     <p><b>Objetivo</b>. Describir el procedimiento para determinar cortisol plasm&aacute;tico    en peces, utilizando la prueba de inmunoensayo enzim&aacute;tico (ELISA). <b>Materiales    y m&eacute;todos</b>. Dos muestras de plasma de trucha arco iris Oncorhynchus    mykiss fueron analizadas empleando un kit de ELISA desarrollado para humanos.    Siete soluciones est&aacute;ndar conteniendo 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400 y 800    ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> de cortisol fueron usadas para construir una curva de calibraci&oacute;n.    Para la prueba de recuperaci&oacute;n se emplearon las soluciones est&aacute;ndar    de 50, 100 y 200 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup>; finalmente, para la prueba de linealidad se prepararon    cuatro diluciones de las muestras de plasma, as&iacute;: 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 y 1/16.    A cada pozo de la placa se adicionaron tanto las muestras de plasma como las    soluciones est&aacute;ndar, las cuales fueron conjugadas con peroxidasa y posteriormente    se adicion&oacute; el substrato de la enzima. Esta reacci&oacute;n enzim&aacute;tica    se detuvo por medio de la adici&oacute;n de &aacute;cido fosf&oacute;rico (0.5    M) y posteriormente, la absorbancia fue medida a 450 nm. La precisi&oacute;n    del procedimiento de pipetaje fue evaluado previo a la prueba. El porcentaje    de recuperaci&oacute;n y de linealidad, as&iacute; como la curva de calibraci&oacute;n    y de paralelismo fueron determinadas. <b>Resultados</b>. La curva est&aacute;ndar    mostr&oacute; un alto coeficiente de correlaci&oacute;n (r2 = 0.998). La concentraci&oacute;n    de cortisol en las dos muestras de plasma fluctu&oacute; entre 64 y 72 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup>.    S&oacute;lo la soluci&oacute;n est&aacute;ndar de 200 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> mostr&oacute;    un porcentaje de recuperaci&oacute;n superior al 80%; en contraste, en las soluciones    est&aacute;ndar de 50 y 100 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> el porcentaje de recuperaci&oacute;n fluctu&oacute;    entre 52 y 71%. En las diluciones de 1/2 y 1/8 se observ&oacute; un buen porcentaje    de linealidad (86 a 168%). Finalmente, las muestras mostraron cierto grado de    paralelismo con la curva est&aacute;ndar. <b>Conclusiones</b>. El uso de la    prueba de ELISA para determinar cortisol plasm&aacute;tico en humanos, es confiable    y eficiente para la cuantificaci&oacute;n de cortisol plasm&aacute;tico en peces.</p>     <p><b>Palabras clave</b>: Cortisol, ELISA, Oncorhynchus mykiss, peces, trucha    arco iris, plasma.</p>      <hr size="1">        <p>    <br>   <b><font size="3">INTRODUCTION</font></b></p>     <p>There are three different stress responses in teleosts including primary, secondary    and tertiary response, each of one with several physiological mechanisms (1).    In the primary responses, cortisol is the principal corticosteroid identified    in teleosts (2), being the most sensitive steroid hormone marker (1) produced    in the interrenal cells by the ACTH stimulation and released in response to    a variety of stressors (3, 4). The main responses influenced by stress include    effects on ionic and osmotic regulation with changes in the plasma ionic concentration,    branchial ionic fluxes, plasma osmotic pressure, volume and composition of the    urine and salt absorption (5); protein and carbohydrate metabolism, stimulating    gluconeogenesis from amino acids and glycogen in the liver and thus increasing    blood glucose (1, 6); blood cell movement from haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues    (7); immune system with disturbance in tissue repair, anti-inflammatory reactions,    phagocytosis and lympoid system (7,8) and effects on growth (7).</p>     <p>Cortisol has been measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),    one of the most suitable immunoassay techniques owing to high sensitivity and    specificity (1). In addition, this technique does not require expensive instrumentation    or advanced technical expertise (9,10); perhaps, the most significant advantage    on others immunoassays such as radioimmunoassay (RIA) is that ELISA does not    need radioisotopes (10). In fish the use of direct ELISA is the most common    (11, 12); however, Tintos et al (1) validated the use of indirect ELISA assay    to determine plasma cortisol in fish. Therefore, the aim of the present study    was describe the methodology of the competitive ELISA to measure plasma cortisol    in juvenile rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum).</p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <b><font size="3">MATERIALS AND METHODS</font></b></p>     <p>Pipetting calibration. Pipetting volume of 20, 50, 100 and 200 &micro;l were    weighed in analytical balance in order to guaranty the accuracy of the pipetting    procedure during the ELISA assay. Each volume taken was weighed in a plastic    container with a previous zeroing of the balance. <a href="#tab1">Table 1</a>    shows the weight of each pipetting volume.</p>          <p>    <center><a name="tab1"><img src="img/revistas/mvz/v12n1/v12n1a02tab1.gif"></a></center></p>        <p>ELISA assay for cortisol. Two juveniles of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss    with c.a. 15 -&nbsp;20 cm of fork length and 90 - 150 g of body weight were    anaesthetized by immersion in MS-222 solution (0.1%, Sigma Co., St Louis, Missouri).    Blood samples were taken from the caudal peduncle using heparinized syringes    to obtain plasma after centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 5 min, maintained on    ice until determination of cortisol concentrations.</p>     <p>Ninety-six well plates for cortisol ELISA (DRG Diagnostics, Frauenbergstrasse,    Germany) were used. For this assay only 38 wells were used and the fish plasma    samples were analysed in duplicate.</p>     <p>Recovery test. Three Eppendorf tubes of 1.5 mL were prepared with standard    solution of 50, 100 or 200 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> and fish plasma samples. Standard solutions    and fish plasma samples were mixed 1:1 (v:v) and to each tube previously labelled    were added 30 &micro;l of fish plasma sample and 30 &micro;l of the respective    standard solution. The tubes were maintained at room temperature (c.a. 20&ordm;C).</p>     <p>Linearity test. Four Eppendorf tubes (1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16) indicating the dilution    of the fish plasma sample were labelled; in this case standard solutions and    fish plasma samples were mixed 1:1 (v:v). For the first dilution (1/2) 30 &micro;l    of fish plasma sample and 30 &micro;l of standard 0 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> were mixed. Consequently,    30 &micro;l of the 1/2 dilution and 30 &micro;l of 0 ng ml<sup>-1</sup> standard solution    was taken and mix in the second tube to prepare the dilution of 1/4. This procedure    was repeated for the two remainder dilution. The samples were maintained at    room temperature.</p>     <p>Assay protocol. For the assay, 20 &micro;l of each of cortisol human plasma    standard solution (0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup>) and fish plasma    sample were added in duplicate to the plate. In the same way, the samples for    the recovery and linearity test were dispensed in others wells. Standard solutions    and fish plasma samples for recovery test were assayed in duplicate.</p>     <p>Subsequently, 200 &micro;l of enzyme conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (DRG    Diagnostics, Frauenbergstrasse, Germany) was added into each well. Finally,    the wells were gently mixed on a plate mixer at a 200 beats.min-1 for 10 min    and incubated for 1 h at room temperature.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The well contents were briskly eliminated to avoid any residual content. The    solution of each well was removed by washing the plate three times with 400    &micro;l of PBS and shaking out the content onto absorbent paper with the aim    of removing residual drops that could affect the accuracy and precision of the    assay. Subsequently, 100 &micro;l of TMB (tetramethylbenzidine) enzyme substrate    (DRG Diagnostics, Frauenbergstrasse, Germany) was added to each well and incubated    for 15 min at room temperature. The enzymatic reaction was visualized by the    colour change and was stopped by addition of 100 &micro;l of 0.5 M phosphoric    acid (H2PO3). The intensity of colour is inversely proportional to the concentration    of cortisol in the samples. Absorbance was read in a spectrophotometer at 450    nm on a microtiterplate reader within 10 min after addition of stop solution.</p>     <p>Curves. A standard curve was plotted with the aim of calculating the concentration    of cortisol of each plasma sample. The curve was plotted with log concentration    of each standard solution against logit optical density. For this, the mean    of the absorbance values of 20, 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> standard solutions    was used. The optical density (OD) was calculated as absorbance of the each    standard solution over the absorbance of the zero standard solution. Once OD    was determined, the logit OD was calculated using the follow equation: Logit    OD: log (OD/(100-OD)).</p>     <p>Finally, with the aim to verify the parallelism between standard curve and    fish diluted plasma samples, the logarithm relative (log relative) of the fish    diluted plasma samples against logit OD of these diluted samples were plotted    in the same graph with the standard curve.</p>     <p>All values are expressed as mean &plusmn; SEM. For all statistical analysis,    GraphPad InStat Software version 3.06 (1992-2003) and GraphPad Prism Software    version 4.03 (1992-2005) were used.</p>     <p>    <br>   <b><font size="3">RESULTS</font></b></p>     <p>The accuracy of the pipetting procedure was observed in the four pipetting    volumes evaluated (<a href="#tab1">Table 1</a>). <a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>    summarises the results of optical density (OD) and logit OD of the standard    solutions. Most of the values of absorbance for standard solutions showed a    coefficient of variance (CV) less than 10%; however, the 400 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup>    standard solution showed a high CV (18%).</p>            <p>    <center><a name="tab2"><img src="img/revistas/mvz/v12n1/v12n1a02tab2.gif"></a></center></p> 	     <p>The standard curve showed a high correlation coefficient between logit OD and    log of standard solution concentration (<a href="#fig1">Figure 1</a>). According    to the equation obtained with the standard curve (Y = -0.5381x-1.4332), the    equation for cortisol determination was calculated as follows:</p>            ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="fig1"><img src="img/revistas/mvz/v12n1/v12n1a02fig1.gif"></a></center></p> 	     <p>X = (logit OD + 1.4332) / - 0.5381</p>     <p>Where X corresponds to the cortisol concentration expressed as a logarithm;    then, the antilogarithm of X value was calculated to obtain the final concentration    of cortisol. The procedure for calculation of the cortisol concentration is    summarises as follows: the absorbance obtained for each sample was used to obtain    the OD; both OD and logit OD were calculated as described above. In the two    plasma fish samples a low CV was observed. The cortisol concentration of two    fish samples fluctuated between 64 and 72 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> (<a href="#tab3">Table    3</a>).</p>            <p>    <center><a name="tab3"><img src="img/revistas/mvz/v12n1/v12n1a02tab3.gif"></a></center></p> 	     <p>The final concentration of cortisol and recovery percentage is shows in the    <a href="#tab4">Table 4</a>. Only the 200 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> standard solution    showed a recovery percentage superior to 80%; in the remainder concentrations    (50 and 100 ng.ml<sup>-1</sup>) the recovery percentage fluctuated between 52    and 71%. On the other hand, in the dilution of fish plasma sample 1/2, 1/4 and    1/8 were observed a good percentage of linearity (86 to 168%); however, the    dilution of 1/16 showed the greatest value (superior to 280%, Table 5). Finally,    the fish plasma samples showed a good parallelism with the standard curve (<a href="#fig2">Figure    2</a>).</p>            <p>    <center><a name="tab4"><img src="img/revistas/mvz/v12n1/v12n1a02tab4.gif"></a></center></p> 	 	      <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><a name="fig2"><img src="img/revistas/mvz/v12n1/v12n1a02fig2.gif"></a></center></p> 	       <p>    <br>   <b><font size="3">DISCUSSION</font></b></p>     <p>The basal cortisol plasma levels in rainbow trout fluctuate between 2 to 25    ng.ml<sup>-1</sup> (1,10). Due to cortisol being the most readily stress hormone to assess    the activity of hypothalamic-pituitary-interrenal axis - HPI - (4), the increase    of plasma levels has been frequently associated to short-term stressors (13).  </p>     <p>Several factors affect the plasma cortisol levels in fish including size and    age of fish, time of day, rearing temperature (10, 14, 15), reproductive stage    (16), acclimation conditions, handling (11, 13), tank confinement (10, 13),    use of anaesthetics (17), changes of osmotic condition (12), air exposition    (11, 13) and fish strains (16). Variation of response to stressful condition    among species has been reported, being salmonids one of the species that respond    almost immediately to handling and crowing stress (11, 16). In the present study,    the higher values of plasma cortisol (three-fold) observed could be associated    with these later conditions, especially with the handling stress.</p>     <p>The coefficient of variance, smaller than 10%, could reflected a good level    of reproducibility; however, the low number of individual sampled did not offered    a high level of accuracy, being necessary a major number of repetitions.</p>     <p>The low percentage of recovery can not be attributed to inaccuracy of pipetting    itself owing to the fact that the volume was verified correctly on the analytical    balance; however, it is probably that during the pipetting method some errors    have occurred. Although the procedure was done at room temperature, is probable    that the bound enzyme could be affected by temperature variations and edge effects.    On the other hand, due to washing procedure affecting greatly the sensitivity    and precision of the assay, is probable that the contents had not been removed    correctly and this affected the recovery percentage. </p>     <p>The good percentage of linearity reflects a high sensitivity and affinity of    this ELISA human kit to determine plasma cortisol in fish; this result was confirmed    by the good parallelism observed between standard curve and fish samples dilution    curve proving the validity of this assay.</p>     <p>In conclusion, the use of human plasma cortisol for ELISA procedure is useful    for fish cortisol plasma determination and could be used as a tool to assess    the stress effects in fish; however, the methodology requires high accuracy    and rigour to avoid errors in the results and interpretation. </p>     <p><b>Acknowledgements</b>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   This study is part of Y. Velasco Master Research project and was supported by    the Programme Al&acirc;an, the European Union Programme of High Level Scholarships    for Latin America, scholarship No. E06M103042CO. The authors wish to thank Dr.    Katherine Sloman for her orientation and logistical support during the assay    procedure.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3"><b>REFERENCIAS</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p> 1. Tintos A, Miguez J, Mancera J, Soengas J. Development of a microtitre plate    indirect ELISA for measuring cortisol in teleosts, and evaluation of stress    responses in rainbow trout and gilthead sea bream. J Fish Biol 2006; 68(1):    251-263.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000066&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>2. Tripathi G, Verma P. Pathway-specific response to cortisol in the metabolism    of catfish. Comp Biochem Physiol B 2003; 136(3): 463-471.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000067&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>3. Leung W, Chan P, Bosgoed F, Lehmann K, Renneberg I, Lehmann M et al. One-step    quantitative cortisol dipstick with proportional reading. J Immunol Methods    2003; 281(1-2): 109-118.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000068&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>4. Donaldson E. The pituitary-interrenal axis and indicator of stress in fish.    In: Pickering AD (Ed.), Stress and Fish Bristol Academic Press Inc 1981, pp.367&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000069&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>5. Eddy F. Effects of stress on osmotic and ionic regulation in fish. In: Pickering    AD (Ed.), Stress and Fish, Bristol, Academic Press Inc 1981, pp.367.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000070&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>6. Nelson D, Cox M. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, W.H. Freeman &amp;    Co 2005, pp.1119.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000071&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>7. Chester J, Chan D, Henderson I, Ball J. The adrenocortical steroids, adrenocorticotropin    and the corpuscles of Stannius. In: Hoar WS and Randall DJ (Eds.), Fish Physiology:    The Endocrine System, London, Academic Press Inc 1969, pp.446.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000072&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>8. Ellis A. Stress and the modulation of defence mechanims in fish. In: Pickering    AD (Ed.), Stress and Fish, Bristol, Academic Press Inc 1981, pp.367.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000073&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>9. Jensen K, Ankley G. Evaluation of a commercial kit for measuring vitellogenin    in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2006; 64(2):    101-105.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000074&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>10. Barry T, Lapp A, Kayes T, Malison J. Validation of a microtitre plate ELISA    for measuring cortisol in fish and comparison of stress responses of rainbow    trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush). Aquaculture    1993; 117(3-4): 351-363.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000075&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>11. Carey J, McCormick S. Atlantic salmon smolts are more responsive to an    acute handling and confinement stress than parr. Aquaculture 1998; 168(1-4):    237-253.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000076&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>12. Kelly S, Woo N. The response of sea bream following abrupt hyposmotic exposure.    J Fish Biol 1999; 55(4): 732-750.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000077&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>13. Bayunova L, Barannikova I, Semenkova T. Sturgeon stress reactions in aquaculture.    J Appl Ichthyol 2002; 18(4-6): 397-404.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000078&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>14. Cataldi E, Di Marco P, Mandich A, Cataudella S. Serum parameters of Adriatic    sturgeon Acipenser naccarii (Pisces: Acipenseriformes): effects of temperature    and stress. Comp Biochem Physiol A 1998; 121(4): 351-354.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000079&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>15. Lankford S, Adams TE, Cech J. Time of day and water temperature modify    the physiological stress response in green sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris.    Comp Biochem Physiol 2003; 135(2): 291-302.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000080&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>16. Schreck C, Contreras-Sanchez W, Fitzpatrick M. Effects of stress on fish    reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny. Aquaculture 2001; 197(1-4): 3-24.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000081&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>17. Ortu&ntilde;o J, Esteban M, Meseguer J. Effects of four anaesthetics on    the innate immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish    Immunol 2002; 12(1): 49-59.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000082&pid=S0122-0268200700010000200017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tintos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mancera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soengas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Development of a microtitre plate indirect ELISA for measuring cortisol in teleosts, and evaluation of stress responses in rainbow trout and gilthead sea bream]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Fish Biol]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>251-263</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tripathi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pathway-specific response to cortisol in the metabolism of catfish]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comp Biochem Physiol B]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>136</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>463-471</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bosgoed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lehmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Renneberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lehmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[One-step quantitative cortisol dipstick with proportional reading]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Immunol Methods]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>281</volume>
<numero>1-2</numero>
<issue>1-2</issue>
<page-range>109-118</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Donaldson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The pituitary-interrenal axis and indicator of stress in fish]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pickering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Stress and Fish]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Bristol Academic Press Inc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eddy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of stress on osmotic and ionic regulation in fish]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pickering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Stress and Fish]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<page-range>367</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Bristol Academic Press Inc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cox]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>1119</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[W.H. Freeman & Co]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chester]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ball]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The adrenocortical steroids, adrenocorticotropin and the corpuscles of Stannius]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Randall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fish Physiology: The Endocrine System]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<page-range>446</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press Inc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ellis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Stress and the modulation of defence mechanims in fish]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pickering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Stress and Fish]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<page-range>367</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Bristol, Academic Press Inc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jensen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ankley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of a commercial kit for measuring vitellogenin in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecotoxicol Environ Saf]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>101-105</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lapp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kayes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Validation of a microtitre plate ELISA for measuring cortisol in fish and comparison of stress responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aquaculture]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<numero>3-4</numero>
<issue>3-4</issue>
<page-range>351-363</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McCormick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Atlantic salmon smolts are more responsive to an acute handling and confinement stress than parr]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aquaculture]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>168</volume>
<numero>1-4</numero>
<issue>1-4</issue>
<page-range>237-253</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Woo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The response of sea bream following abrupt hyposmotic exposure]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Fish Biol]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>732-750</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayunova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barannikova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Semenkova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Sturgeon stress reactions in aquaculture]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Appl Ichthyol]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>4-6</numero>
<issue>4-6</issue>
<page-range>397-404</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cataldi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Di]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marco P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mandich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cataudella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Serum parameters of Adriatic sturgeon Acipenser naccarii (Pisces: Acipenseriformes): effects of temperature and stress]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comp Biochem Physiol A]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>121</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>351-354</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lankford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cech]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Time of day and water temperature modify the physiological stress response in green sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Comp Biochem Physiol]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>135</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>291-302</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schreck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Contreras-Sanchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fitzpatrick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Aquaculture]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>197</volume>
<numero>1-4</numero>
<issue>1-4</issue>
<page-range>3-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortuño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esteban]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meseguer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of four anaesthetics on the innate immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fish Shellfish Immunol]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>49-59</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
