<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0122-0268</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista MVZ Córdoba]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev.MVZ Cordoba]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0122-0268</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Córdoba - Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0122-02682018000106429</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21897/rmvz.1238</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Postnatal teeth procedures affect the weight gain and welfare of piglets]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Los procedimientos dentales postnatales afectan la ganancia de peso y el bienestar de los lechones]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menegatti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lucas]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kaine CC]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baggio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rafael A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zotti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria LAN]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Aleksandro S]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paiano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Diovani]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Santa Catarina State University West Education Center Department of Zootechny]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santa Catarina ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>6429</fpage>
<lpage>6437</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0122-02682018000106429&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0122-02682018000106429&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0122-02682018000106429&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Objective.  We carried out this study to evaluate weight gain (WG), mortality, blood serum proteins (BP), facial lesions of littermates submitted to different teeth procedures.  Material and Methods.  The experiment was performed in a commercial breeding farm. Were used 15 sows, allotted into three groups: control, where piglets&#8217; teeth were kept intact (IT); teeth clipping (CT); and teeth grinding using an electric grinder (GT). We evaluated WG, BS (five males/litter), mortality, low viable piglets rates and facial lesions in piglets. Additionally, we evaluated sows&#8217; backfat thickness (P2) and teat lesion score. BP data, lesion score and WG were assessed individually. For WG, the initial weight and the litter size were used as covariates. Regarding other variables, we used the average of the litter. When there were differences, the means were compared using Duncan test (p&lt;0.05).  Results. In the first week, GT piglets presented higher WG. In the second week, CT presented worst WG. In the first two weeks as in the total period, CT piglets presented worse WG than the GT. Mortality and low viable piglets rates were not influenced. After the fourth day, CT and GT treatment reduced facial lesions. There was no effect on BP. Treatments did not influence P2 and teat lesion score.  Conclusions.  Treatments did not have influence on mortality, low viable rates, BP of the piglets and P2 and teat lesions score. CT treatment decreased weight gain and IT increased face lesions score.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Objetivo. Este estudio fue realizado para evaluar la ganancia de peso, mortalidad, proteínas plasmáticas (BP), lesiones faciales en los lechones y en las cerdas, grasa dorsal (P2) y lesiones en los pezones en lechigadas sometidas a diferentes manejos dentales.  Materiales y métodos. La investigación fue conducida en una granja comercial de cría. Fueron utilizadas quince cerdas, divididas en tres grupos: control, en el cual los dientes de los lechones permanecieron intactos; descolmille con alicate; descolmille con limadora eléctrica. Nosotros evaluamos WG, BP (cinco machos/lechigada), mortalidad, lechones de baja viabilidad y lesiones faciales en los lechones. En las cerdas, nosotros evaluamos P2 y la escala de lesiones en los pezones. Los datos de BP, escala de lesiones y WG fueron evaluados individualmente. Para el WG, el peso inicial y el tamaño de la lechigada fueron considerados. Acerca de las otras variables, nosotros usamos el peso promedio de la lechigada. Cuando hubo diferencias, las medias fueron comparadas usando la prueba de Duncan (p&lt;0.05).  Resultados. En la primera semana, los lechones del GT presentaron mayor WG. En la segunda semana el CT presentó la peor WG. En las dos primeras semanas así como en el período total, los lechones del CT presentaron peor WG de que los del GT. La mortalidad y los lechones de baja viabilidad no fueron influenciados. Después del cuarto día, el CT y el GT redujeron las lesiones faciales. No hubo efectos en BP. Los tratamientos no influenciaron P2 y las lesiones en los pezones.  Conclusiones. Los tratamientos no influenciaron en la mortalidad, lechones de baja viabilidad, BP de los lechones y en la escala de lesiones en los pezones de las cerdas. CT redujo la ganancia de peso y IT aumentó las lesiones faciales.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[clipping teeth]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[grinded teeth]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[facial lesions]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[maternity procedures]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[descolmille con alicate]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[descolmille con limadora eléctrica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[lesiones faciales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[manejo en la maternidad]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dzikamunhenga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anthony]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coetzee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gould]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karriker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pain management in the neonatal piglet during routine management procedures Part 1: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized intervention studies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anim Health Res Rev]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>14-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>AVMA. American Veterinary Medical Association</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Literature Review on the Welfare Implications of Teeth Clipping, Tail Docking and Permanent Identification of Piglets]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hansson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lundeheim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Facial lesions in piglets with intact or grinded teeth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Vet Scand]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<numero>23</numero>
<issue>23</issue>
<page-range>1-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutherland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Welfare implications of invasive piglet husbandry procedures, methods of alleviation and alternatives a review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[N Z Vet J]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>52-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Commission of the European Communities</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<page-range>1-3</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brussels ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Official Journal of the European Communities]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marchant-Forde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McMunn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cheng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pajor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marchant-Forde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being The effects of alternative techniques delivered separately]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Anim Sci]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1479-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thompson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Armed sibling rivalry among suckling piglets]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Behav Ecol Sociobiol]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>9-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jansen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kirkwood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zanella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tempelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[J Influence of gestation housing on sow behavior and fertility]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Swine Health Prod]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>132-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Necoechea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Doenças e meio ambiente]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Suinocultura Industrial]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>13-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MLV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pedersen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Does light attract piglets to the creep area]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Animal]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1032-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Beirendonck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Driessen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verbeke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Permentier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van de Perre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Improving survival, growth rate, and animal welfare in piglets by avoiding teeth shortening and tail docking]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Vet Behav]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>88-93</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Asanome]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lagemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Driemeier]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dental periapical abscesses in piglets affected by postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome PMWS]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pesqui Vet Bras]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>271-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[XJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RQ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ST]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Effects of tail docking and teeth clipping on the physiological responses, wounds, behavior, growth, and backfat depth of pigs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Anim Sci]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>4908-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stukenborg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Traulsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stamer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Puppe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krieter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The use of a lesion score as an indicator for agonistic behaviour in pigs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archiv Tierzucht]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>163-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
