<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0122-0667</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Médica de Risaralda]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Revista médica Risaralda]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0122-0667</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0122-06672019000100004</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Aplicación del método Robson en la caracterización de cesáreas realizadas en un hospital de tercer nivel de Pereira]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Aplication of Robson&#8217;s method in cesarean sections characterization, in a third level hospital at Pereira]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piedrahita-Agudelo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Melissa]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaviria-Maya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Esteban]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Universitario San Jorge  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Pereira ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>4</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0122-06672019000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0122-06672019000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0122-06672019000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  Objetivo: El aumento en cantidad de cesáreas se asocia con morbimortalidad materna. El modelo Robson, utilizado para identificar grupos de mayor aporte a tasas de cesárea, se aplicó en un hospital de tercer nivel para caracterizar grupos de pacientes cesareadas, describir causas obstétricas y desenlaces maternos y fetales.  Materiales y métodos:  Estudio de cohorte histórica descriptiva realizado en un hospital de alta complejidad. De 2053 gestantes, se incluyeron 667 cesareadas (32,4%) de enero-diciembre de 2014, con datos completos en la historia clínica. Se excluyeron cuando no existió la información para diligenciar el formato de recolección de datos. Se realizó análisis descriptivo utilizando los programas SPSS 20-Excel 2010. Se usó el modelo Robson para calcular tamaño y proporción de cada grupo a la tasa general de cesárea y se describieron causas de cesárea, desenlace materno y neonatal. El estudio lo aprobó el Comité de Ética Hospitalaria.  Resultados:  Los grupos Robson que más contribuyeron fueron 5 y 10, con proporciones sobre el total de cesáreas de 25,5% y 11,2%, respectivamente. Cesárea previa y compromiso del bienestar fetal fueron las principales causas. 99 pacientes presentaron complicaciones relacionadas con cesárea, la infección puerperal fue más frecuente (6.9%). 173 recién nacidos requirieron unidad neonatal, con dificultad respiratoria como principal complicación (44%).  Conclusiones:  El análisis descriptivo y el modelo Robson permitieron agrupar las pacientes en grupos 2, 5 y 10, además evidenciaron complicaciones maternas y fetales consistentes con estudios publicados. Esto contribuye a las estadísticas regionales y nacionales.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  Objective: The increase in number of caesarean sections is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality. The Robson model, used to identify groups with higher contributions at cesarean rates, was applied in a tertiary hospital to characterize groups of patients with highest percentage of cesarean section, describe obstetric causes and maternal and fetal outcomes.  Materials and methods: Descriptive historical cohort study conducted in a highly complex hospital. Of 2053 pregnant women, 667 were included (32.4%) from January-December 2014, with complete data in the clinical history. They were excluded when there was no information to fill out the data collection format. A descriptive analysis was carried out using the SPSS 20-Excel 2010 programs. The Robson model was used to calculate the size and proportion of each group at the general cesarean rate and causes of cesarean, maternal and neonatal outcomes were described. The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee.  Results: The Robson groups that contributed the most were 5 and 10, with proportions over the total cesarean sections of 25.5% and 11.2%, respectively. Prior cesarean section and commitment to fetal well-being were the main causes. 99 patients presented complications related to cesarean section, puerperal infection was more frequent (6.9%). 173 newborns required a neonatal unit, with respiratory distress as the main complication (44%)  Conclusions:  The descriptive analysis and the Robson model allowed to group the patients in groups 2, 5 and 10, besides they showed maternal and fetal complications consistent with published studies. This contributes to regional and national statistics.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cesárea]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[clasificación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[salas de parto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[embarazo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cesarean section]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[classification]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[delivery rooms]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cyr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: commentary and historic perspective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>194</volume>
<page-range>932-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zuleta-Tobón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quintero-Rincon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quiceo-Ceballos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Aplicación del modelo de Robson para caracterizar la realización de cesáreas en una institución de tercer nivel de atención en Medellín, Colombia. Estudio de corte transversal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<page-range>90-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Appropriate technology for birth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lancet]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>^s8452</numero>
<issue>^s8452</issue>
<supplement>8452</supplement>
<page-range>436-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Departamento de Salud Reproductiva e Investigación</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Declaración de la OMS sobre tasas de cesárea]]></article-title>
<collab>Organización Mundial de la Salud</collab>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lumbiganon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laopaiboon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gulmezoglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taneepanichskul]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruyan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007- 08]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lancet]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>375</volume>
<page-range>490-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zavaleta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Donner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wojdyla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faundes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>335</volume>
<numero>^s7628</numero>
<issue>^s7628</issue>
<supplement>7628</supplement>
<page-range>1025</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valladares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wojdyla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zavaleta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velazco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lancet]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>367</volume>
<page-range>1819-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gülmezoglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lumbiganon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laopaiboon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fawole]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC medicine]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rusen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ID]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liston]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kramer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baskett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>191</volume>
<page-range>1263-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cárdenas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cesarean-associated complications: the importance of a scarcely justified use]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gac Med Méx]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>138</volume>
<page-range>357-66</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (Fecolsog)</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Racionalización del uso de la cesárea en Colombia. Consenso de la Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (Fecolsog) y la Federación Colombiana de Perinatología (Fecopen) Bogotá, 2014]]></article-title>
<collab>Federación Colombiana de Perinatología (Fecopen)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<page-range>139-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zavaleta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Donner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wojdyla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faundes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>335</volume>
<numero>^s7628</numero>
<issue>^s7628</issue>
<supplement>7628</supplement>
<page-range>1025</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gibbons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Belizan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Betran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merialdi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Althabe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>206</volume>
<numero>^s4</numero>
<issue>^s4</issue>
<supplement>4</supplement>
<page-range>331 e1-19</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Connolly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[High caesarean section figures in Northern Ireland questioned: BBC News Northern Ireland]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What is the right number of caesarean sections]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lancet]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>349</volume>
<page-range>815-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>República de Colombia</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nacimientos por tipo de parto según departamento de ocurrencia]]></article-title>
<collab>Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Integrantes del Consenso de la Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (FECOLSOG)</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Racionalización del uso de cesárea en Colombina, consenso de la Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (FECOLSOG) y la Federación Colombiana de Perinatología (FECOPEN)]]></article-title>
<collab>Federación Colombiana de Perinatología (FECOPEN)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>^s2</numero>
<issue>^s2</issue>
<supplement>2</supplement>
<page-range>139-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torloni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Betran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Widmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gulmezoglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>6</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Classification of caesarean sections]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>^s1</numero>
<issue>^s1</issue>
<supplement>1</supplement>
<page-range>23-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. Geneva, Switzerland]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[World Health Organization]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Triunfo S]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ferrazani S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lanzone A]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Scambia G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson ten group classification in a tertiary level hospital]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>189</volume>
<page-range>91-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>República de Colombia. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE)</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nacimientos por tipo de parto según departamento de ocurrencia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Betrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merialdi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bing-Shun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thomas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Look]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>^s2</numero>
<issue>^s2</issue>
<supplement>2</supplement>
<page-range>98-113</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira EC]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pacagnella RC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cecatti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Gynaecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>129</volume>
<numero>^s3</numero>
<issue>^s3</issue>
<supplement>3</supplement>
<page-range>236-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Niino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biosci Trends]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>139-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zavaleta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Donner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wojdyla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faundes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study]]></article-title>
<collab>World Health Organization 2005</collab>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>335</volume>
<page-range>1025</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Obstetric Care Consensus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>123</volume>
<page-range>693-711</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torloni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Betran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Widmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gulmezoglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>6</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Troendle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reddy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[UM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laughon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Branch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burkman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>203</volume>
<numero>^s326</numero>
<issue>^s326</issue>
<supplement>326</supplement>
<page-range>e1-326.e10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
