<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0122-3461</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ingeniería y Desarrollo]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ing. Desarro.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0122-3461</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fundación Universidad del Norte]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0122-34612023000100010</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14482/inde.41.01.611.072</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Validación de resultados a través de algoritmo Montecarlo en procedimiento de calibración de temperatura]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Validation of results through Montecarlo algorithm in procedure temperature calibration]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gil Miranda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andrés David]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serna Serna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Walter]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zuleta Gilon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lina Marieth]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira Facultad de Ciencias Básicas ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Pereira ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira Facultad de Ingenierías ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Pereira ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Audifarma S.A  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0122-34612023000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0122-34612023000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0122-34612023000100010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Los organismos evaluadores de la conformidad (OEC) acreditados por ISO/IEC 17025 realizan la validación de resultados, con el fin de confirmar mediante la revisión de competencia técnica la provisión de evidencia objetiva, evaluando el cumplimiento de los requisitos normativos necesarios para una aplicación específica [1]. La Guía para la expresión de la incertidumbre en la medición (GUM) proporciona dos alternativas para evaluar y expresar la incertidumbre de medición. La primera es una metodología basada en un modelo lineal de propagación de incertidumbre, y la segunda es un procedimiento alterno de propagación por simulación de Montecarlo (MCM) [2]. Si bien la primera alternativa es la más utilizada por los OEC, debido a su simplicidad, en este trabajo se propone usar la segunda alternativa basada en MCM como método de validación de resultados. Para esto, se presenta una guía de implementación de los algoritmos descritos en el suplemento 1 de la GUM, en el procedimiento de calibración de equipos de medición de temperatura con base en la norma técnica Thermometers, contact, direct reading: Calibration (NT VVS 103). Los resultados obtenidos muestran una tolerancia numérica aceptable, comprobando la efectividad de la herramienta propuesta en el uso de la metodología GUM validada mediante los procedimientos descritos en el suplemento 1.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract Conformity assessment bodies (OEC) accredited by ISO/IEC 17025 perform validation of results, in order to confirm by technical competence review the provision of objective evidence, assessing compliance with the necessary regulatory requirements for a specific application [1]. The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) provides two alternatives for evaluating and expressing measurement uncertainty. The first is a methodology based on a linear model of propagation of uncertainty, and the second is an alternative method of propagation by Monte Carlo simulation (MCM) [2]. Although the first alternative is the most used by OEC due to its simplicity, in this work it is proposed to use the second alternative based on MCM as a method of validating results. For this purpose, an implementation guide for the algorithms described in Supplement 1 of the GUM is presented, in the calibration procedure for temperature measurement equipment based on the technical standard Thermometers, contact, direct reading: Calibration (NT VVS 103). The results obtained show an acceptable numerical tolerance, verifying the effectiveness of the proposed tool in the use of the GUM methodology validated through the procedures described in Supplement 1.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estimación de incertidumbre]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[propagación de incertidumbre]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[simulación de Montecarlo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[validación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Montecarlo simulation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[uncertainty estimation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[uncertainty propagation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[validation]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>[1]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA["Requisitos generales para la competencia de los laboratorios de ensayo y calibración"]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ISO/IEC]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>[2]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cox]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["On a Monte Carlo method for measurement uncertainty evaluation and its implementation"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Metrologia]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>S176</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>[3]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. Méndez]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Varas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. Ramíez]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Validación de la estimación de incertidumbre en la calibración de matraces para el método de sustitución simple sin masa de sensibilidad mediante el Método de Monte Carlo"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ingeniería]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>1-2</numero>
<issue>1-2</issue>
<page-range>183-93</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>[3]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khodabocus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balgobin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[«Implementation and practical benefits of ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 in a testing laboratory.,*]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Mauritius Research Journal]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>27-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>[4]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gromczak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ostrowska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siadek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harmatys]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kowalski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Validation model for coordinate measuring methods based on the concept of statistical consistency control"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Precision Engineering]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>414-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>[5]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kurniadi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Amrina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Designing ISO/IEC 17025: 2017-Based Laboratory Quality Manual: A Case of Laboratory of Environmental Engineering in Andalas University"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>14-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>[6]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahmoud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegazy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the uncertainty estimation in hardness measurements"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>[7]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.-l.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. X.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Adaptive Monte Carlo and GUM methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of cylindricity error"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Precision Engineering]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>856-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>[8]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shimaoka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kinoshita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tosaka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Evaluation of measurement datasupplement 1 to the guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement-propagation of distributions using a monte carlo method"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JCGM]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<page-range>101</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>[9]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA["Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement"]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>[10]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cox]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siebert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Metrologia]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>S178</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>[11]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Damasceno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Couto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Methods for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Metrology Intech Open]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>9-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>[12]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paisan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Determinación de la incertidumbre de medición por el método de Monte Carlo en los procesos de manufactura"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tecnología Química]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>56-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>[13]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the uncertainty estimation in electromagnetic compatibility testing"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Progress In Electromagnetics Research]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>125-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>[14]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jalid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA["Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo methods on the flatness uncertainty estimation in coordinate measuring machine"]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>302</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>[15]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Becerra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA["Evaluación del desempeño en los ensayos de aptitud de los laboratorios de calibración y el impacto en sus CMCs"]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Simposio de Metrología]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>[16]</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>NIST</collab>
<source><![CDATA["Uncertainty Machine"]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
