<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0122-9761</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - INVEMAR]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0122-9761</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES MARINAS Y COSTERAS "JOSE BENITO VIVES DE ANDRÉIS" (INVEMAR)    INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES MARINAS Y COSTERAS -JOSE BENITO VIVES DE ANDRÉIS- (INVEMAR)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0122-97611995000100006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[SUCCESSIONAL PATTERNS ON FOULING PLATES IN THE BAY OF SANTA MARTA, COLOMBIAN CARIBBEAN]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garcia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Camilo B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salzwedel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Horst]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras José Benito Vives D'Andreis, INVEMAR  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santa Marta ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Corporación Autónoma Regional del Magdalena y de la Sierra Nevada, CORPAMAG  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santa Marta ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>1995</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>1995</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>95</fpage>
<lpage>121</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0122-97611995000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0122-97611995000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0122-97611995000100006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Successional progress was followed in fouling communities, developing under tropical conditions. Primary succession was simulated by immersing asbestos plates. The plates represent small, discrete, isolated parts of habitat. According with expectations, a trend of increasing space dominancy by colonial forms was detected as succession progressed. High within-habitat diversity but global persistency was confirmed for this tropical system. Several mechanisms of succession were found to operate simultaneously. In this Caribbean fouling system thestrong self-replacement tendencies of solitary forms and the low recruitment and growth rates of the potential space dominants (colonial forms) were mostly responsible for the successional patterns observed.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se siguió el progreso sucesional en comunidades de "fouling" bajo condiciones tropicales. La sucesión primaria fue simulada mediante el uso de placas de asbesto. Las placas representan partes pequeñas, aisladas y discretas de habitat. De acuerdo a lo esperado, se observó que las formas coloniales tienden a dominar el espacio a medida que la sucesión avanza. Se confirmó el patrón de alta diversidad dentro de habitats junto con persistencia global en este sistema tropical. Varios mecanismos de sucesión operaron simultáneamente. Las fuertes tendencias de auto-reeplazamiento de las formas solitarias y las bajas tasas de reclutamiento y crecimiento de las formas coloniales potencialmente dominadoras del espacio son responsables de la mayor parte de los patrones sucecionales observados.]]></p></abstract>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="verdana" size="2">     <p align="center"><font size="4"><b>SUCCESSIONAL PATTERNS ON FOULING PLATES IN THE BAY OF  SANTA MARTA, COLOMBIAN CARIBBEAN</b></font></p>      <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Camilo B. Garcia<sup>1</sup>  and Horst Salzwedel<sup>2</sup></b></p>     <p><i><sup>1</sup>Instituto de  Investigaciones Marinas  y Costeras Jos&eacute; Benito Vives D'Andreis, INVEMAR, A.A.  1016, Santa Marta,  Colombia (C. B. G.)    <br> <sup>2</sup>Corporaci&oacute;n Aut&oacute;noma Regional del Magdalena y de la Sierra  Nevada, CORPAMAG, Calle 23 # 4-27,  Santa Marta, Colombia (H.S.)</i></p> <hr size="1"/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p>Successional progress  was followed in fouling communities, developing under tropical conditions.  Primary succession was simulated by immersing asbestos plates. The plates  represent small, discrete, isolated parts of habitat. According with expectations,  a trend of increasing space dominancy by colonial forms was detected as  succession progressed. High within-habitat diversity but global persistency was  confirmed for this tropical system. Several mechanisms of succession were found  to operate simultaneously. In this Caribbean fouling system thestrong  self-replacement tendencies of solitary forms and the low recruitment and  growth rates of the potential space dominants (colonial forms) were mostly  responsible for the successional patterns observed.</p> <hr size="1"/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     <p>Se sigui&oacute; el  progreso sucesional en comunidades de &quot;fouling&quot; bajo condiciones  tropicales. La sucesi&oacute;n primaria fue simulada mediante el uso de placas de  asbesto. Las placas representan partes peque&ntilde;as, aisladas y discretas de  habitat. De acuerdo a lo esperado, se observ&oacute; que las formas coloniales tienden  a dominar el espacio a medida que la sucesi&oacute;n avanza. Se confirm&oacute; el patr&oacute;n de  alta diversidad dentro de habitats junto con persistencia global en este  sistema tropical. Varios mecanismos de sucesi&oacute;n operaron simult&aacute;neamente. Las  fuertes tendencias de auto-reeplazamiento de las formas solitarias y las bajas  tasas de reclutamiento y crecimiento de las formas coloniales potencialmente  dominadoras del espacio son responsables de la mayor parte de los patrones  sucecionales observados.</p> <hr size="1"/>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>INTRODUCTION</b></p>     <p>Studies of succession on  fouling plates have a long tradition (e.g. Anonymous, 1952; Cairns, 1982). Like  in other fields, however, the bulk of work has been conducted in temperate  latitudes, while the number of fouling studies in tropical waters is rather  scarce (for instance, Shoener <i>et al</i>. 1978). The study presented here follows  the successional progress of such a particular system developing under tropical  conditions. Substrata chosen for the study were asbestos plates which are  thought to simulate a disturbance that has created space for colonization or  has eliminated the biota totally (primary succession, sensu Clemens, 1904). They also  represent type 2 patches (sensu Sousa, 1985 and Connell and  Keough, 1985), i.e. discrete small parts of habitat isolated from existing  assemblages as opposed to type 1 patches, i.e., non-isolated parts of habitat.</p>     <p>The definition of type 2 patches has a number  of implications as to the modes of occupancy, particularly in two aspects: (1)  isolation, which implies that occupancy can only occur from the plankton and  hence reproductive activity of remote parental populations, larval dispersal  potential and regional hydrodynamics will determine the availability of  competent larvae (Connell and Keough, 1985) and, (2) small size (but also shape  and orientation of the substrata) that will influence settlement, which is, in  turn, a function of the interaction between physical (transport regime at the  boundary layer) and biological (larval behavior) agents (Vandermeulen and  Dewreede, 1982; Keough, 1984; Jackson, G. A., 1986). Based on these  implications it is possible to predict a number of patterns as to how  succession will proceed (see below). Findings in this work will be compared with  such predicted patterns, in particular with regard to three aspects: (1)  functional groups, (2) effect of duration and date of immersion, and, (3) the  mechanisms of succession.</p>     <p>(1) Jackson (1977a and b; 1979) introduced  the concept of functional groups for epibenthic organisms on the basis of body  plan, which has implications as to how resources are used. He distinguished  between solitary and colonial animals, between determinate (mostly solitary  animals) and indeterminate growth (mostly colonial animals) and, for colonial  animals, between a number of growth forms. In general, he suggested that  colonial animals are superior competitors for space with respect to solitary by  virtue of their spread capacity (indeterminate lateral growth) on the  substratum without needing sexual reproduction or recruitment, and by being  less susceptible to fouling. Solitary animals do not disappear from local  systems thanks to behavioral adaptations like gregariousness or escape in size,  and selective disturbance events. He postulated that solitary and colonial  animals with poor space competitive abilities will have higher recruitment  rates and tend to be opportunistic strategists, appearing early in succession.</p>     <p>Jackson (1977b), Kay and  Keough (1981) and Keough (1984) found that the occupation of isolated patches  of hard substrata by different functional groups was strongly size-dependent.  Small substrata tended to select poor space competitors such as solitary  animals, notably serpulid polychaetes, and inferior colonial space competitors,  notably sheet bryozoans, while larger substrata were more likely to collect  better colonial space competitors, notably tunicates and sponges.</p>     <p>Thus, since in this study  the plates represent small, discrete and isolated patches and taking into account  the differential biology of potential colonists, plates immersed for a short  time and early in succession are expected to show a greater incidence of  solitary and colonial species with poor competitive abilities. As succession  progresses and eventually better competitors recruit (in general growth  indeterminate colonial organisms), this pattern is expected to reverse (Connell  and Keough, 1985; but see Greene <i>et al</i>. 1983).</p>     <p>(2) With respect to effect of  duration and date of immersion the following scenario may be expected (based on  Moore, 1972, Sutherland, 1974, Sutherland and Karlson, 1977, Sutherland, 1980  and 1981, Greene <i>et al</i>. 1983 and Hatcher <i>et al</i>. 1989): in regions where  recruitment is more or less continuos and of low intensity, like  the tropics, chance differences in initial occupation of patches will persist  for long periods, specially for small isolated habitats. This will produce high  within habitat diversity, i.e., individual patches differing from each other,  but global persistency of the system, i.e., similar species composition and  relative abundances for extended periods of time, the rate of change depending  on the invasibility and longevity of the resident assemblages. In consequence,  the plates are expected to exhibit assemblage heterogeneity. The system, in  contrast, is expected to be globally persistent.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>(3) As for the mechanisms of  succession, several types of interspecific interactions operating  simultaneously are expected. Sutherland (1978), Sousa (1979) and Dean and Hurd  (1980), for instance, have documented cases both of inhibition and facilitation  interactions between invaders and residents. It is expected, however, that  inhibitory interactions between invaders and residents increase, as well as  competition between residents, as the assemblages become saturated and space  becomes scarce (initial non-interactive stage followed by a longer, interactive  stage in terminology of Simberloff, 1974; see also Sutherland and Karlson, 1977  and Greene <i>et al</i>., 1983).</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b></p>     <p>A description of the study  site (the NW Pier of the Santa Marta port in front of the Instituto de  Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras Jos&eacute; Benito  Vives D'Andreis, INVEMAR, 11&deg;15'08&quot;N: 74&deg;13'13&quot;W, Bay of Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean) and  of the environmental setting can be found in Garcia and Salzwedel (1993, in  particular their figures 2-3, and references therein).</p>     <p>Asbestos plates (10 cm x 10 cm) were used to  simulate primary succession in discrete, small, isolated patches of habitat.  The plates were fixed to a PVC frame tied to the bottom under a pier and  maintained up right by means of buoys so that the plates were placed at  aproximately 9 m depth. Only the side of the plates facing outside the pier was  studied.</p>     <p>The sampling was done biweekly starting April  30, 1981 and ending April 29, 1982. On each sampling date two plates were taken  out, one of which had been inmersed at the start and the other two weeks before  sampling, and replaced in the frame by new ones. Plates were also regularly  photographed in situ (35 mm slides). Thus, three  series of plates and a photographic record of different stages of development  were obtained. Here we report results of the first series of plates, i.e., the  series that reflects successional progress (called here after successional plates),  and of the photographic record, which describes the interplay of date and  duration of immersion. Garcia and Salzwedel (1993) reported results on the  second series of plates (called here after recruitment plates, see that work  for more details).</p>     <p>There is a potential bias in gathering  information from the slides, where species were distinguished on the base of  color and texture. Since we tried to be rather conservative in deciding to add  a new species (a new color and texture) we expect the bias in the direction of  underestimating the actual number of species. A total of 192 slides were  assessed (see <a href="#tab1">Table 1</a>).</p>     <p>On retrieved plates  solitary sessile organisms, i.e., mostly, serpulid polychaetes and barnacles  were counted and measured when feasible, and their percentage cover estimated.  Abundances and smaller size-classes were underestimated for those species whose  juvenile tubes could not be distinguished. The polychaete serpulid worms <i>Hydroides cf, brachiacanthus</i>, <i>Hydroides parvus</i> and <i>Protula</i> sp (herein collectivelly called Hb/Hp/P) were  considered together and quantified only in terms of percentage cover, as were <i>Salmacina</i> sp, <i>Filograna</i> sp and <i>Josephella marencelli</i>  (called S/F/J), in both cases on account of their similar tubes, which for each  group can hardly be distinguished. Spirorbinae polychaetes 1, 2 and 3 (species  not identified) were considered together when percentage cover was estimated on  account of the similarity of their growth form and low cover. Only percentage  cover was estimated for serpulid <i>Pseudovermilia occidentalis</i> and colonial  organisms (encrusting bryozoans). Since the only adult barnacle found was  <i>Balanus trigonus</i>, we assumed that all juvenile barnacles belong to this  species. Percentage cover of bare space on plates was estimated as well,  corresponding to real bare primary space and primary space previously occupied  by soft-bodied organisms which were lost after plates were dried (see Garcia  and Salzwedel, 1993). On slides percentage cover of colonial organisms  (encrusting bryozoans and sponges, mainly) was estimated. Rarely occurring  species (in general less than 1 % accumulated cover at the end of the year)  were not considered in the analysis.</p>     <p align="center"><a href="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06tab1.gif" target="_blank">Tabla 1</a><a name="tab1"></a></p>     <p>The carino-rostral distance and the diameter of the  aperture was meassured for <i>B. trigonus</i> and serpulid polychaetes, respectively. The  latter because the tubes are readily overgrown (personal observation)  making it impossible to estimate their length. Length measurements were done  using a computerized image analyzer system, not directly on the hard  structures, but on the respective distances translated to paper by means of a camera lucida.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Percentage cover was  estimated using point sampling techniques (e.g. Bohnsack, 1979 on slides;  Sutherland, 1981 on plates). For plates two arrays of 100 randomly positioned  points each were used. First a transparent sheet with the points on it was  superimposed on the plate under study and the identity of the organism (or bare  space) at each point was registered. In the case of epizoism the point was  counted two times, thus giving a potential of more than 100 % cover. The same  procedure was performed on the same plate with the second array of points and  the results pooled. Percentage cover on slides was estimated by projecting the  slide vertically onto a 23 x 23 point grid on a digitizing table which was  connected to a computer. Then with an electronic pencil the number of  occurrences of the selected item at the points was entered into the computer.  The output of the program written for this purpose provided the percentage  cover for the different items (Garcia, 1990). Numerical analysis is described  on presentation of results.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</b></p>     <p>General faunal and colonization patterns</p>     <p>A complete list of species  is presented in <a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>. Three main groups constitute the bulk of colonists in  terms of occupancy of space: serpulid polychaetes (16 species considering rare  ones), which showed the highest level of percentage cover; cirripedes,  represented by only one species; and sponges (7 species). Bryozoans (5 species,  all encrusting forms) and tunicates (only 1 colonial species) played mostly a  secondary role. Algae were probably excluded from the plates by adverse light  conditions under the pier at 9 m depth. Interestingly, hydrozoans, which are  well represented in the area (Bandel and Wedler, 1987), were not detected on  the slides.</p>     <p>The comparison of  forms (solitary versus colonial) as space occupiers shows a similar pattern  with solitary percentage cover developing faster and at consistently higher  levels than colonial percentage cover (<a href="#fig1">Fig. 1</a>). <a href="#fig2">Figure 2</a> shows colonization  curves for the plates, i.e. the number of species plotted against sampling  date. The curve of the total number of species rises rapidly, then it levels  off after about week 18 (<a href="#fig2">Fig. 2</a>). There is a slow decline in the total number  of species for the next three months but a subsequent rise to a new peak in  week 44, suggesting perhaps the beginning of an oscillatory phase. When the  curve of total number of species is decomposed into its solitary and colonial  species components a number of patterns can be seen. The solitary species number  curve (number of species per plate) rises much faster and reaches its highest  level much sooner than the corresponding curve for colonial species  (accumulated number of species per sampling date on slides, <a href="#fig2">Fig. 2</a>). Thus,  solitary species showed higher colonization rates (more species immigrating  onto the plates per unit time) than colonial species. After the maximal level  in both curves is reached, they tend to run parallel.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06tab2.gif"><a name="tab2"></a></p>     <p>Community structural change with time</p>     <p>Temporal evolution of  the fouling communities is depicted in <a href="#fig3">Fig. 3a</a> and <a href="#fig3">3b</a> in the form of  two-dimensional nonmetrical multidimensional scaling plots (NMDS ordination)  performed on sampling dates (weeks missing in the graph were not considered). The  data set consisted of arc-sine transformed (1/sin(symbol 214 \f  &quot;Symbol&quot; x)) percentage cover values (individual values for plates,  mean values for slides) as recommended by Underwood (1981) for this type of data.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig1.gif"><a name="fig1"></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig2.gif"><a name="fig2"></a></p>     <p>In order  to assess the possible impact on the analysis of equating in the slides texture  and color forms to species, ordination of sampling dates was performed twice,  once with all species treated individually, and once with sponges and bryozoans  as two items (<a href="#fig3">Fig. 3a</a> and <a href="#fig3">3b</a>, respectively). Results are very similar  suggesting that the bias introduced by not being able to identify colonial  species does not compromise the analyses.</p>     <p>Succession in the  plates was gradual and with a well defined direction in time. NMDS plots  clearly show a temporal gradient of development with changes slowing down after  about week 18 (<a href="#fig3">Fig. 3a</a> and <a href="#fig3">3b</a>). Structural change was investigated by means of  plots of diversity and evenness indices, based on percentage cover data,  plotted against sampling dates. <a href="#fig4">Fig. 4a</a> and <a href="#fig4">b</a> shows the plots for the N1, N2  Hill's diversity numbers (Ludwig and Reynolds 1988) and the k-diversity index  (KDT) proposed by Garcia (1993) (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4a</a>), and for the modified Hill's ratio E5  (Ludwig and Reynolds, 1988) and the k-dominance index (KDO, Garcia, 1993) (<a href="#fig4">Fig.  4b</a>). <a href="#tab3">Table 3</a> shows the k-dominance Matrix of Comparisons (Garcia, 1993) between  sampling dates.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig3.gif"><a name="fig3"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig4.gif"><a name="fig4"></a></p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06tab3.gif"><a name="tab3"></a></p>     <p>Diversity rose rapidly to a maximum level in week 14  for N1 and N2, and 18 for the KDI (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4a</a>), concomitantly with the achievement  of the first peak in number of species (see <a href="#fig2">Fig. 2</a>). Evenness closely followed  this pattern (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4b</a>) suggesting similar dynamics of space occupancy between  colonists for that initial period. Afterwards diversity decreased continually  at a low rate to the end of the immersion year, except a short leveling off  between weeks 40 to 48 (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4a</a>), probably caused by a strong recruitment event  of the barnacle <i>Balanus trigonus</i> (see below). However, this recruitment event  does not seem to have improved the distribution  of percentage cover between species as it was barely reflected in eveness as  expressed by E5 <a href="#fig4">(Fig. 4b</a>). Dominance, on the other hand as expressed by the KDO  index, showed perhaps a clearer response as it inverted its increasing tendency  for that periods (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4b</a>). This pattern of decreasing diversity was due to  differential space occupancy rates between residents, with some species losing  and others gaining space, rather than to loss of species (see section below).  As shown in <a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>, most of the species occur more than 60 % of sampling dates, i.e. basically, the complete pool  of species, including the space dominants, are present most of the time.</p>     <p>The evenness curve (E5)  shows an oscillatory phase after the first peak which coincided with the  maximal diversity and minimal dominance (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4a</a>), until week 36 (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4b</a>).  Afterwards evenness decreased rapidly suggesting an accelerated space  monopolization trend by some species. This is confirmed by the behavior of  dominance (KDO), which increased simultaneously (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4b</a>).</p>     <p>Performance of species and groups during  succession and Recruitment Pressure</p>     <p>The cirripede <i>Balanus trigonus</i> showed well-defined  patterns of space occupancy. From week 0 to week 34 individuals accumulated at  low rates and mean size of individuals rose (<a href="#fig5">Fig. 5</a>), suggesting low levels of  recruitment to the fouling communities. This pattern is partially explained by  low availability of larvae in this period as reflected in the recruitment  plates (Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993). Thus, in this first period increasing  occupancy of space by this species, i.e. increasing percentage cover (<a href="#fig5">Fig. 5</a>),  is attributable to growth of residents. Between weeks 38 and 46, however, a  strong recruitment event occurred as indicated by the dramatical fall in mean  size, while no less dramatically abundance rose (<a href="#fig5">Fig. 5</a>). In response to this  recruitment event, percentage cover also increased steeply (<a href="#fig5">Fig. 5</a>) indicating that  recruitment was strong enough to account for space occupancy patterns during  that period. Afterwards abundance showed a decreasing pattern due probably to  mortality, while mean size increased (<a href="#fig5">Fig. 5</a>). Thus, the further increase in  percentage cover (<a href="#fig5">Fig. 5</a>) is due to growth. The main period of recruitment of  this species as identified in the recruitment plates (Garcia and Salzwedel,  1993) coincides with this strong recruitment event in the succession plates.  The implication is that the fouling assemblages, although in an advanced stage  of development after about 8-9 months of immersion, were no barrier to the &quot;rain&quot; of <i>B. trigonus</i> larvae.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig5.gif"><a name="fig5"></a></p>     <p>The serpulid polychaete <i>Pomatocerus minutus</i> also displayed a defined pattern of space  occupancy like <i>B. trigonus</i> but of a different sign. The highest abundance  was reached very rapidly by week 6. Concomitantly percentage cover reached its  maximal values in week 8, while mean size remained low (<a href="#fig6">Fig. 6</a>). These patterns  suggest that space occupancy was accounted for mostly by recruitment in that  period. Afterwards both abundance and percentage cover declined to the end,  while mean size showed the opposite trend (<a href="#fig6">Fig. 6</a>). Two conclusions can be  drawn from these patterns. First, that after the first recruitment event at the  beginning of the inmersion time, coincident with the main period of  recruitment for this species as identified in the recruitment plates (Garcia  and Salzwedel, 1993), new recruitment onto the succesional plates was  negligible, either because the assemblages constituted an effective barrier to  the larvae, or, because of the low availability levels of ready-to-settle  larvae (Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993). Second, the growth of residents did not  compensate as mechanism of space occupancy, probably on account of the small  size (no massive tubes) of this species.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig6.gif"><a name="fig6"></a></p>     <p><i>Pseudovermilia multispinosa</i>, another serpulid polychaete, showed somewhat  different patterns of development compared with <i>P. minutus</i>. Abundance increased rapidly to peak in week 18  and then fell at slow rate until the end of the immersion time (<a href="#fig7">Fig. 7</a>). Mean  size and percentage cover, in turn, increased continually to the end (<a href="#fig7">Fig. 7</a>).  Thus, occupancy of space was for this species until about week 18 a function of  both recruitment and growth. Up to this point recruitment lost its importance  as suggested by the decreasing pattern of abundance and the increasing pattern  of mean-size. However, contrasting with <i>P. minutus</i>, this species continued gaining space (<a href="#fig7">Fig. 7</a>),  suggesting that growth of residents prevented the decline of this species as  space occupier, probably on account of its massive tube. Relations with  recruitment patterns in the recruitment plates are obscured by the fact that  counting included <i>Pseudovermilia occidentalis</i> (tubes not distinguishable on the recruitment  plates, Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993). Nevertheless, the strongest recruitment  event for these two species on the recruitment plates coincides with the highest abundance level on the succesional plates  for <i>P.  multispinosa</i> (compare Fig. 4 in Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993 with  <a href="#fig7">Fig. 7</a>). Thus, the decline in abundance for this species seems related rather  to lower recruitment pressure than to inhibitory interactions by the developing  fouling assemblages.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig7.gif"><a name="fig7"></a></p>     <p>For S/F/J there seems to be a consistent relation  between percentage cover in succesional plates and recruitment in recruitment  plates. After a first period of similar increasing trends, recruitment on the  recruitment plates started decreasing at about week 28, while percentage cover  in succesional plates continued its increasing trend (<a href="#fig8">Fig. 8</a>). New subsidiary  peaks in recruitment in the recruitment plates seem to be reflected in  percentage cover oscillations on the succesional plates (<a href="#fig8">Fig. 8</a>). Thus, it  would seem that space occupancy patterns before about week 28 were controlled  both by recruitment and growth, but afterwards growth became more important,  even though, recruitment was not totally obstructed. Moreover, Salmacina, Filograna and Josephella are capable of asexual reproduction by  transverse fission or scissiparity, which may lead to chains of individuals  (Ten Hove, 1979). The impact of this phenomenon in the occupancy patterns of  this groups is unknown but probably not unimportant as such chains were common  on the plates.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig8.gif"><a name="fig8"></a></p>     <p>For  Hb/Hp/P, in contrast, there seem to be no relation between recruitment on  recruitment plates and percentage cover on succesional plates (<a href="#fig9">Fig. 9</a>). This  might be an indication that growth rather than recruitment is responsible for  space occupancy patterns in this group, and that in advanced stages of  community development, the larvae of this group, even when abundant, are not  able to invade. After about week 34 this group lost space as the decreasing  percentage cover curve indicates (<a href="#fig9">Fig. 9</a>).</p>     <p>Of the seven species  of sponges registered only two were important space occupiers and of this only  Sponge 1 consistently gained space during the year of immersion (see <a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>).  The other sponge species tended to enter the fouling communities slightly later  (or, were detected later on the slides) and fluctuated at low levels of  percentage cover (less than 10 % for a given date). The last assertion is also  valid for all the other colonial organisms (<a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>). Since recruitment  pressure could not be assessed for colonial organisms, except bryozoans, its  impact on the developing fouling assemblages is unknown (but most likely  small). Bryozoans were found to recruit at similar high intensities most of the  year in the recruitment plates (Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993). This high  recruitment level, however, was not reflected in the succesional plates as  bryozoans were found to be marginal space occupiers (<a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>). Therefore at  least for this group recruitment pressure can be considered unimportant as a  mechanism of space occupancy. The general impression for colonial organisms is  one of low recruitment and growth rates but high variability in the succesional plates.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig9.gif"><a name="fig9"></a></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Effect  of duration and date of immersion on assemblage development</b></p>     <p>This analysis is based  exclusively on information gathered from the slides (see Materials and  Methods). Consequently only the colonial fraction of the fauna is examined  here. Nonmetrical multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was performed on arc-sine  transformed percentage cover data as before.</p>     <p><a href="#fig10">Figure 10</a> shows a  two-dimensional NMDS plot of slides, which portrays the evolution of 9 plates  photographed repeatedly during the year of immersion, the plates having  different immersion dates. No clear grouping pattern emerges from the plot  (<a href="#fig10">Fig. 10</a>). However, there seem to be two tendencies in the ordination of the  slides: (1) slides representing early stages of development (6 and 10 weeks  from immersion date) tend to segregate from slides representing later stages of  development, which is to be expected, but in a random fashion, i.e. regardless  of the immersion date of the plates; (2) for later stages of development, the  identity of the plate appears to be more important as a grouping factor than  date or duration of immersion. Some plates also developed in very different  directions due to space dominance of rare species. On plate 95, for instance,  Tunicate 1 covered 54.6 % of the surface after 46 weeks of immersion, which may  explain its ordering in the plot (<a href="#fig10">Fig. 10</a>).</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig10.gif"><a name="fig10"></a></p>     <p>In order to test the null hypothesis that the  development of the fouling assemblages (the colonial fraction) is independent  of the date of immersion of the plates, i.e., that for any species it is a matter of  chance for which immersion date the highest and the lowest percentage cover  occur, the slides were grouped according to duration of immersion (<a href="#tab4">Table 4</a>), on each group a Friedman two-way  analysis of variance was conducted and the Kendall coefficient of concordance  (Siegel, 1956) was calculated. Since the Friedman test requires the same number  of cases (species) in the samples (slides) drawn under the different conditions  (immersion dates), missing values (in any one group of slides species present on some  slides but not in others) were given a score of 0.</p>     <p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06tab4.gif"><a name="tab4"></a></p>     <p><a href="#tab4">Table 4</a> shows that in no  case could the null hypothesis be rejected (p&gt;0.05). The Kendall coefficient  of concordance, which takes values between 0 and 1 (Siegel, 1956), shows only  very low values. Both results suggest that historical events on individual  plates are of prime importance to the dynamics of the colonial fraction of the  colonists. The fact that the results are the same for long and short durations  of immersion indicates the lack of any homogenizing process, at least for the  time scale of this study. NMDS plots of slides (<a href="#fig11">Fig. 11</a>) depicting the  evolution of groups of plates immersed in different dates for 34, 38, 42 and 46  weeks confirms this assertion. The slides show no definite grouping pattern.</p>     <p><b>Predictions and syntesis</b></p>     <p>A number of predictions were made as to how  succession would proceed in this Caribbean system concerning: (1) Solitary and  colonial forms as competitors with the latter being superior than the former. (2)  Within-habitat diversity versus global persistency. (3) Simultaneus operation  of several mechanisms of succession (see Introduction for more details).</p>     <p>The first prediction  was only partly met in this study. Both accumulation of species and, occupancy  of space proceeded much more rapidly for the solitary fraction than for the  colonial fraction of the colonists during early succession.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="img/revistas/mar/v24n1/v24n1a06fig11.gif"><a name="fig11"></a></p>     <p>However,  later in succession, instead of the predicted decline and exclusion of the  solitary forms as a consequence of competition with the colonial forms, both  continued to develop in a somewhat parallel fashion. Moreover, there is  evidence that, although at much lower rate, the solitary forms were not  prevented from conquering primary space in later stages in the succession.</p>     <p>This behavior contrary to  expectations may be explained through a combination of several factors: (1)  Life-history strategy features of the solitary forms, notably gregariousness  (Burke, 1986), which tend to prevent extinction from local systems. (2) The  continuous creation of free primary space in the form of the calcareous tubes  of serpulid polychaetes and the shells of barnacles, which would favor new  settlement of solitary forms (e.g. Keen and Neill, 1980; Quian and Lui, 1990)  probably also retarding succession. (3) The ability of certain solitary forms  to gain space by growing, notably the serpulid polychaete <i>Pseudovermilia multispinosa</i>  and the barnacle <i>Balanus trigonus</i>, or by invading the  assemblages from the plankton even at advanced stages of development, notably  by <i>B. trigonus</i>. (4) The time scale of this study (one year),  which was probably too short for competitive exclusion to be completed in this  system as potential space dominants although present, are slow growing forms  (Porifera, colonial tunicates) and, hence, the disturbance regime of the system  (sloughing off events, for instance) is likely to work in longer time scales.  So the adyacent pier with more than a decade in its place is dominated by  colonial organisms (Sanchez, 1984).</p>     <p>An alternative explanation  that the observed patterns are the product of a higher number of solitary than  colonial species in the location of the study seems unlikely, because the total  number of solitary species found in the year (18) is comparable with the total number  of colonial species (14). A more convincing argument is the report by Zea  (1987) of 67 porifera species for the Santa Marta area. The faunal dynamics on  the plates is mediated by their size. Bigger plates would probably have been  conductive to a more rapid displacement of solitary species by colonial species  in this system, as postulated by Jackson (1977a,b) and Keough (1984).</p>     <p>An artifact influencing the  resulting pattern of space occupancy is the fact that due to epizoism solitary  forms will tend to receive more points during the estimation of percentage  cover (on the plates) than colonial forms (mostly on the slides but for  bryozoans on the plates as well). However, initial stages of development, when  epizoism is reduced, showed even more markedly this difference in space  occupancy rate (due mostly to serpulid colonists, see <a href="#fig3">Fig. 3</a>); and, even though  at lower rates after about week 20, percentage cover of solitary forms  continued increasing to the end (mostly due to cirripede colonists, <a href="#fig3">Figs. 3</a> and  <a href="#fig4">Fig. 4</a>). Both facts suggest that this pattern is real. An inspection of the  primary space curve (<a href="#fig4">Fig. 4</a>) provides additional evidence as to the role of  solitary forms as space occupiers. The curve's trend indicates that occupancy  of primary space contributed substantially to this increasing pattern of  percentage cover by solitaries, also after week 20. The implication of this is  that although colonial forms were present and growing, they could not prevent  solitary forms from colonising primary space on the plates.</p>     <p>As to the colonization dynamic of the plates  the possibility of overestimation of the number of solitary species in some  sampling dates can not be ruled out, since, as mentioned before, certain  serpulids were treated together. Thus, when the tube form S/F/J (see above) was  registered it counted for three species, but there is not certainty that the  three species were actually on the plate. The effect would be to  &quot;inflate&quot; the importance of solitary species in analysis involving  number of species. Moreover, the number of colonial species is thought to be  underestimated as adding new species based on color and texture on the slides  was done in a conservative manner. However, even in the worst case (when for  the tube forms Hb/Hp/P and S/F/J six species are computed being only two  actually present on the plate for a sampling date) the conclusion that solitary  species displayed a higher colonization dynamics than colonial species still  holds. For example <a href="#fig5">Fig. 5</a>: if for each sampling date in the solitary species  curve four species are subtracted, it still runs over the colonial species  curve most of the time, and this although the information for solitary species  originates from nonreplicated plates whereas the information for colonial  species originates from replicated slides and accumulated number of species is  plotted in the colonial species curve instead of mean number of species per  sampling date, which, in turn, should compensate for the presumed  underestimation in the number of colonial species.</p>     <p>The second prediction which  was tested only for the colonial forms, was met as the colonial species settled  independent of the date of immersion and persisted on the plates, regardless of  the duration of immersion within the time scale of this study. In addition, the  reasons adduced to explain this pattern seem to apply in the system under study  (see Introduction): recruitment intensity was probably low and unpredictable,  growth rate was also low (no plate was monopolized) and the species were  long-lived (again in the time-scale of this study). The small size of the  plates probably discouraging settlement by colonial species also contributed to  the aleatority in their settlement.</p>     <p>It is interesting to speculate which picture would have emerged if the  solitary forms could have been included in this part of the analysis. As showed  and discussed elsewhere (Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993), the solitary forms did  respond to local climate changes, although in no uniform fashion. Different  dates of immersion would have favored the recruitment of some species over  others, though without automatically excluding any. Therefore, although  solitary forms appeared to be in general more uniformly distributed in time  than colonial forms, their recruitment patterns would have also contributed to  the within-habitat diversity. For how long this effect would have lasted, would  have depended on the fate of the residents and on the ability of the larvae to  invade from the plankton. On the other hand, at least in one instance  within-habitat diversity would have been reduced: during and immediately after  the main recruitment period of Balanus trigonus (the dry season). This  species was found able to invade the assemblages in great numbers even at an  advanced developmental stage (&quot;swamp&quot; effect, Sutherland, 1978) and  to gain space by growing. Such an event would have tended to homogenize the  assemblages, i.e. to reduce within-habitat diversity.</p>     <p>The third prediction was  concerned with the mechanisms of succession. Structural change with time in the  system can be divided in two stages. The first is non-interactive in that all  the colonists were gaining space regardless of the presence of other species,  and the number of species was increasing. This stage lasted until about week  20. In the second stage, some colonists continued to gain space, whereas others  were loosing territory. Among the former were Balanus trigonus,  <i>Pseudovermillia multispinosa</i>, <i>Salmacina</i> sp/<i>Filograna</i> sp/<i>Josephella marenzelli</i> (S/F/J), Porifera as a  group, and particularly Sponge 1 (encrusting yellow form) and the colonial  tunicate; among the later were <i>Pomatoceros minutus</i>, <i>Spirorbinae polychaetes</i> 1,  2 and 3, and <i>Hydroides cf  brachyacanthus</i>/<i>Hydroidesparbus</i>/<i>Protula</i> sp (Hb/Hp/P), whereas  bryozoans as a group and <i>Psudovermillia  occidentallis</i> stabilized at low and very low space  occupancy, respectively. The question here is to what extent is this patterns  due to interspecific interactions among residents and between residents and  invading larvae. The observations give no indication that predation played a  role in this system. Therefore this aspect will be ignored. Three other  relevant interactions in such a system have been postulated: (1) competition  for space between residents, (2) degree of resistance to invasion from the  plankton (inhibition) and its counterpart, (3) grade of enhancement of  recruitment from the plankton by residents (facilitation).</p>     <p>Interspecific competition for space in hard  substrata is assumed whenever physical contact between organisms occurs,  particularly in situations of limited available space (Osman, 1977; Sutherland,  1978). The interaction has basically two outcomes, either growth at the contact  edges stops (not necessarily permanently), or one organism physically overgrows  the other, totally or partially (Russ, 1982; Sebens, 1982). The consequence for  the overgrown organism is generally death of the overgrown tissue. Death of the  whole organism does not necessarily follow, not even when the overgrown  organism is totally covered (Ayling, 1983; Todd and Turner, 1988).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Such interference competition did occur in  the system studied. In the slides, for instance, for a given plate photographed  consecutively, increase of percentage cover by some colonial residents at the  expense of other residents was a common observation. In the plates, tubes of  serpulid polychaetes oriented perpendicular to the substratum, which has been  postulated as a mechanism for escaping competition (Jackson, 1977a; b), were  numerous in later stages. Furthermore, totally covered tubes of small serpulids  and barnacles were observed under the crust of bryozoans.</p>     <p>Inhibition in fouling  systems functions in three ways: settling larvae are consumed by the residents  or are killed by larvotoxic substances produced by the residents (Dyrynda,  1983; Young and Gotelli, 1988; Young and Cameron, 1989) and in a third,  indirect mechanism, larvae actively avoid sites occupied by predators or future  competitors (Grosberg, 1981; Young, 1990). It is difficult to judge to what  extent inhibition took place here. In any case if inhibition did take place,  its effect was clearly modulated by recruitment pressure, i.e. by the number of  ready-to-settle larvae as estimated from the recruitment plate series (for  solitary forms, Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993). Abundance patterns in the recruitment  plates series tended to be reflected in the succesional plates series for most  of the species, the most conspicuous case being the barnacle <i>Balanus trigonus</i>. As for the colonial forms  whether inhibition played a role in their recruitment patterns is an open  question. The only group for which something on recruitment pressure can be  said, are the bryozoans (sheet forms), which were abundant in the recruitment  plates series (Garcia and Salzwedel, 1993) but not in the succesional plates  series. Two explanations are possible: either they did not recruit in the  succesional plates at similar levels as in the recruitment plates due to  inhibition by residents, or they did but were overgrown. There is no reason to  prefer one explanation over the other.</p>     <p>The third type of interaction, enhancement of  recruitment (facilitation), has been associated in hard bottom systems with  increasing physical structuring of the assemblages through the colonists  (Brault and Bourget, 1985; Okamura, 1986; Navarrete and Castilla, 1990), not to  mention the known phenomenon of gregariousness (Chia, 1990; Gotelli, 1990). The  first mechanism is not species-specific, although at least one exception is  known (Turner, 1983), and is not strictly biological as mimetic artificial  structures have the same effect (Dean, 1981; Bros, 1987).</p>     <p>In this system, apparently no species was  particularly dependent on biogenically produced structure in order to colonize.  That is not to say that the appearance of serpulid tubes and barnacle shell  walls on the plates was to no effect. Rather the (assumed) effect was diffuse  and non-discriminatory. The very fact of producing calcareous exoskeletons has  as a consequence that new bare space is created that can be settled by larvae,  thus probably favoring the further recruitment of solitary species in general  in view of their life-history strategy. Such an effect might delay decline of  solitary species when competing for space with colonial species and retard  succession. This diffuse effect together with gregariousness, however, would  rapidly lead to crowded conditions (as the case was, epizoism was a common  observation) augmenting the probability of being overgrown by other solitary  species, and perhaps inhibition (more feeding openings per area). In  conclusion, facilitation operated here as a self-replacement mechanism for  solitary forms as a group hence retarding succession but it probably also  augmented competition between solitary species accelerating the decline of some  of them, an example being Pomatoceros minutus and the Spirorbinae, which  possess no massive tubes.</p>     <p>Thus, it seems that for  this system no single mechanism of succession was dominant in the time scale of  the study, i.e., no clear hierarchy emerged. The prediction that several  mechanism would operate simultaneously was met. This succession was not  followed enough time to test the prediction that inhibition would dominate in  later stages, i.e., in this system, when abundance recruitment patterns in the  recruitment plates series are not longer reflected in the succesional plates  series. But as the space dominants gain space, this would presumably have been  the case, especially with regard to the effect of the colonial species.</p>     <p>How then did succession proceed in this  tropical system and time scale? First, not by replacement of species.  Extinction events in this systems were probably rare, although the decline of a  number of species was apparent. With more time allowed the assemblages would  have become poorer in species. Thus, change with time (in the time-scale of  this study) was instead a function of differential space occupancy rates which,  in turn, responded to both differential recruitment and growth rates,  morphological features, and the ability to invade from the plankton.</p>     <p>Differential recruitment rates  were observed between colonial (low, patchy recruitment) and solitary forms  (high more uniform, although fluctuating recruitment, Garcia and Salzwedel,  1993). Differential growth rates were observed between colonial (slow growth)  and solitary (rapid growth) forms. Morphological features include, apart from  the dichotomy colonial/solitary with the afore mentioned advantages in  competition for space for colonial forms, massive exoskeletons (tubes of <i>Pseudovermilia multispinosa</i>  and <i>Pseudovermilia occidentalism</i> shell walls of <i>Balanus trigonus</i>) which permitted their  possessors to smother smaller forms. Ability to invade from the plankton was,  in turn, a function of both diffuse facilitation by residents as they produced  new bare space (calcareous tubes of serpulid polychaetes and walls of  barnacles) favoring further colonization, specially by solitary forms (and  perhaps gregarism played a role in this context), and recruitment pressure,  i.e., the abundance of ready-to-settle larvae, an abundance that at least for  solitary species was correlated with the local climatic regime (see Garcia and  Salzwedel, 1993).</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</b></p>     <p>This paper is based on a  Dr. rer. nat. dissertation by C.B. Garcia, Biology/Chemistry Faculty,  University of Bremen, Germany. The first author was finantially supported by a  scholarship of the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst, DAAD. Field work  was financed by the Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit, GTZ and  supported by the Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas de Punta de Bet&iacute;n,  INVEMAR. Laboratory work and data analysis was carried  out at the Alfred Wegener Institut fur Polar und Meeresforschung. Dr. Harry A.  Ten Hove (Institut of Taxonomic Zoology, Amsterdam) kindly identified the  serpulid polychaetes. Comments by two anonymous reviewers are gratefully  acknowledged.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>REFERENCES</b></p>     <!-- ref --><p>1 Anonymus 1952. Marine fouling and its  prevention. U.S. Naval Institute, Annapolis, 368 p.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000095&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>2 Ayling, A.L. 1983. Factors  affecting the spatial distrinutions of thinly encrusting sponges from temperate   waters. Oecologia, 60: 412-418. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000096&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>3 Bandel, K.  and E. Wedler 1987. Hydroid, Amphineuran and Gastropod zonation in the littoral  of the   Caribbean Sea, Colombia. Senckenbergiana  maritima 19(1/2): 1-129. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000097&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>4 Bohnsack, J. 1979. Photographic quantitative sampling  of hard-bottom benthic communities. Bull. Mar.   Sci., 29(2): 242-252.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000098&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>5 Brault, S. and E. Bourget 1985. Structural  change in an estuarine subtidal epibenthic community: biotic   and physical causes. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,  21: 63-73. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000099&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>6 Bros, W. 1987. Effects of removing or adding structure (barnacle  shells) on recruitment to a fouling   community in Tampa Bay,  Florida. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 105: 275- 296.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000100&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>7 Burke, R.D. 1986.  Pheromones and the gregarious settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. Bull.  Mar.   Sci., 39(2): 323-331. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000101&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>8 Cairns, J. (Ed). 1982.  Artificial substrates. Ann Harbor Science, Michigan, 279 p. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000102&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>9 Chia, F. 1990.  Differential larval settlement of benthic marine invertebrates: 3-12. In Reproduction,   genetics and distribution  of marine organisms (ed. by J. Rylandand P.J.Tayler).Olsen and Olsen,   Viborg.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000103&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>10 Clemens, F.E. 1904. Plant succession: an  analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnagie Inst.   Washington Publ. 242: 512 p. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000104&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>11 Connell, J.H.  and M.J. Keough 1985. Disturbance and patch dynamics of subtidal marine animals  on   hard substrata:  125-152. In The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamic (ed. by S.T.A.   Pickett and P.S. White). Academic Press.  London. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000105&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>12 Dean, T.A, 1981. Structural aspects of sessile invertebrates as  organizing forces in an estuarine fouling   community. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 53:  163-180. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000106&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>13 Dean, T.A. and L.E. Hurd 1980. Development in an estuarine fouling  community: the influence of early   colonists on later arrivals. Oecologia, 46:  295-301. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000107&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>14 Dyrinda, P.E. 1983. Modular sessile invertebrates contain larvotoxic  allelochemicals. Develop. Compar.   Immun., 7: 621-624.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000108&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>15 Garc&iacute;a, C.B. 1990. Two  simple methods for recording points when using photography and point sampling  techniques. An. Inst. Invest. Mar. Punta de Bet&iacute;n, 19-20: 205-208.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000109&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>16 Garc&iacute;a, C.B. 1993.  Comparing k-dominance curves: yet another suggestion. An. Inst. Invest. Mar.  Punta de Bet&iacute;n, 22: 122-128.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000110&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>17 Garc&iacute;a, C.B. and H.  Salzwedel 1993. Recruitment patterns of sessile invertebrates onto fouling  plates in the Bay of Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean. An. Inst.  Invest. Mar. Punta de Bet&iacute;n, 22: 30-44.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000111&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>18 Gotelli, N.J. 1990.  Stochastic models of gregarious larval settlement. Ophelia, 32(1.2): 95-108.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000112&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>19 Green, C.H.; A. Schoener and E. Corets 1983. Succession on marine hard  substrata: the adaptive   significance of solitary  and colonial strategies in temperate fouling communities. Mar. Ecol.-   Prog. Sen, 3: 121-129.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000113&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>20 Grosberg, R.K. 1981. Seasonal, annual and  spatial variation in the development of hard-bottom   communities. Helgol. wissenschaft.  Meeresuntersuch., 36: 137-150. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000114&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>21 Hatcher, B.G; R.E. Johannes and H.I. Robertson 1  989. Review of research relevant to the conservation   of shallow tropical marine ecosystems.  Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 27: 337-414. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000115&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>22 Jackson, G.A. 1986. Interaction of  physical and biological processes in the settlement of planktonic   larvae. Bull. Mar. Sci., 39(2): 202-212.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000116&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>23 Jackson, J.B.C. 1977a. Competition on marine hard substrata: the adaptive  significance of solitary and   colonial strategies. Amer. Nat., 111: 743-767. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000117&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>24 Jackson, J. B.C. 1977b.  Habitat area, colonization, and development of epibenthic community structure:   349-357. In Biology of benthic  organisms (ed. by B.F. Keegan, P.O. Cidigh and P.J.S. Boaden).   Pergamon Press. London. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000118&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>25 Jackson, J. B.C. 1979. Morphological strategies of sessile animals: 499-553. In Biology and systematics   of colonial organisms, (ed. by G. Larwood and  B.R. Rosen). Academic Press. London. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000119&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>26 Kay, A.M. and M.J. Keough. 1981. Occupation  of patches in the epifaunal communities on pier pilings   and the bivalve Pinna bicolor at Edithburg, South  Australia. Oecologia, 48: 123-130. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000120&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>27 Keen, S.L. and W.E. Neill. 1980. Spatial  relationships and some structring processes in benthic intertidal   communities. J. Exper. Mar. Biol. Ecol.,  45: 139-155.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000121&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>28  Keough, M.J. 1984. Effects of patch size on  the abundance of sessile marine invertebrates. Ecology,   65: 423-437.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000122&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>29 Ludwig, J.A. and J.F. Reynolds 1988.  Statistical ecology. A primer on methods and computing. John   Wiley and Sons, 337 p New York. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000123&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>30 Moore, H.B. 1972. Aspects of stress in the tropical marine environment. Advan. Mar. Biol.,  10: 217-   269.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000124&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>31 Navarrete, S.A. and J.C.  Castilla 1990. Barnacle walls as mediators of intertidal mussel recruitment:  effects of patch size on the utilization of space. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 68:  113-119.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000125&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>32 Okamura, B. 1986. Formation  and disruption of aggregations of Mytilus edulls in the fouling community of  San Francisco Bay, California. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 30: 275-282.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000126&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>33 Osman, R.W. 1977. The  stablishment and development of a marine epifaunal community. Ecol. Monogr.,  47: 37-63.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000127&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>34 Quian, P.Y. and L.L. Lin  1990. Recruitment of barnacles into empty adult test. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.,  142: 63-74.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000128&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>35 Russ, G.R. 1982. Overgrowth  in a marine epifaunal community: competitive hierarchies and networks.  Oecologia, 53: 12-19.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000129&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>36 Sanchez, H. 1984.  Poriferengesellschaften an einer Hafenmole in Santa Marta, Kolumbien, unter dem  Einflussunterschiedlicher Lichtexposition. Dr.rer.nat.Thesis,Universit&auml;t Giessen,  Deutschland, 210 zeiten.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000130&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600036&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>37 Schoener, A., E.R. Long and J.R. DePalma  1978. Geographic variation in artificial island colonization   curves. Ecology, 59(2): 367-382. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000131&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600037&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>38 Sebens, K.P.  1982. Competition for space: growth rate, reproductive output and scape in  size. Amer.   Nat., 120(2): 189-197.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000132&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600038&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>39 Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for  the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, 312 p. Tokio. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000133&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600039&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>40 Simberloff, D.S. 1974.  Equilibrium theory of island biogeography and ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System.,  5: 161-182.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000134&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600040&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>41 Sousa, W.P. 1979. Experimental investigations  of disturbance and ecological succession in a rocky   intertidal algal community. Ecol.  Monog., 49: 227-259. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000135&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600041&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>42 Sousa, W.P. 1 985. Disturbance and patch dynamics on rocky intertidal shores: 101 -124. In The ecology   of natural disturbance and  patch dynamics, (ed. by S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White). Academic   Press. London.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000136&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600042&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>43 Sutherland, J.P. 1974. Multiple stable points  in natural communities. Amer. Nat., 108: 859-873. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000137&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600043&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>44 Sutherland, J.P. 1978.  Functional roles of Schizoporella and Styela in the fouling community at  Beafort,   North Carolina. Ecology, 59: 257-264. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000138&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600044&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>45 Sutherland,  J.P. 1980. Dynamics of the epibenthic community on roots of the mangrove Rhizophora   mangle, at Bah&iacute;a de Buche, Venezuela. Mar. Biol., 58: 75-84.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600045&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>46  Sutherland, J.P. 1981. The fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina: a  study in stability. Amer.   Nat., 118(4): 499-519.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600046&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>47 Sutherland, J.P. and R. Karlson 1977.  Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort,   North Carolina. Ecol. Monog., 47: 425-446.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000141&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600047&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>48 Ten Hove, H.A.1979. Different causes of mass occurrence in serpulids: 281-298. In: Biology and   Systematics of Colonial  Organisms (ed. by G. Larwood and B.R. Rosen). Academic Press.   London.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600048&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>49 Todd, CD. and S.J. Turner  1988. Ecology of intertidal and sublittoral cryptic epifaunal assemblages. II.  Nonlethal overgrowth of encrusting bryozoans by colonial ascidians. J. Exp.  Mar. Biol. Ecol., 115: 113-126.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000143&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600049&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>50 Turner, T. 1983.  Facilitation as a successional mechanism in a rocky intertidal community. Amer.  Nat., 121(5): 729-738.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600050&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>51 Underwood, A. J. 1981.  Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology.   Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 19: 513-605.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600051&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>52  Vandermeulen, H. and R.E. Dewreede 1982. The influence of orientation of an  artificial substrate   (transite) on settlement of marine  organisms. Ophelia, 21(1): 41-48. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600052&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>53 Young, CM. 1990. Selection of predator-free  settlement sites by larval ascidians. Ophelia, 30(2):132-140.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000147&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600053&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>54 Young, CM. and N.J. Gotelli 1988. Larval  predation by barnacles: effects on patch colonization in a   shallow subtidal community. Ecology, 69(3):  624-634. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000148&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600054&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>55 Young, CM. and J.L. Cameron 1989. Differential predation by barnacles  upon larvae of two bryozoans:   spatial effects at small scales. J.  Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 128: 283-294. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000149&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600055&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>56 Zea, S.  1987. Esponjas  del Caribe Colombiano.  Editorial Catalogo  Cient&iacute;fico, 286 p.  Bogot&aacute;.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000150&pid=S0122-9761199500010000600056&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
</name>
<name>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Marine fouling and its prevention]]></source>
<year>1952</year>
<page-range>368</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Annapolis ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[U.S. Naval Institute]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ayling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Factors affecting the spatial distrinutions of thinly encrusting sponges from temperate waters]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<page-range>412-418</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bandel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wedler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Hydroid, Amphineuran and Gastropod zonation in the littoral of the Caribbean Sea, Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Senckenbergiana maritima]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero><numero>2</numero>
<issue>1</issue><issue>2</issue>
<page-range>1-129</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bohnsack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Photographic quantitative sampling of hard-bottom benthic communities]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bull. Mar. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>242-252</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brault]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bourget]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Structural change in an estuarine subtidal epibenthic community: biotic and physical causes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>63-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bros]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of removing or adding structure (barnacle shells) on recruitment to a fouling community in Tampa Bay, Florida]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>105</volume>
<page-range>275- 296</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pheromones and the gregarious settlement of marine invertebrate larvae]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bull. Mar. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>323-331</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cairns]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Artificial substrates]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<page-range>279</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Michigan ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ann Harbor Science]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Differential larval settlement of benthic marine invertebrates]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rylandand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tayler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reproduction, genetics and distribution of marine organisms]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<page-range>3-12</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Olsen and OlsenViborg]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clemens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation]]></source>
<year>1904</year>
<volume>242</volume>
<page-range>512</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Carnagie Inst. Washington Publ.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Connell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keough]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Disturbance and patch dynamics of subtidal marine animals on hard substrata]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pickett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.T.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[White]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamic]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<page-range>125-152</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Structural aspects of sessile invertebrates as organizing forces in an estuarine fouling community]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>163-180</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Development in an estuarine fouling community: the influence of early colonists on later arrivals]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<page-range>295-301</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dyrinda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Modular sessile invertebrates contain larvotoxic allelochemicals]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Develop. Compar. Immun.]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>621-624</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Two simple methods for recording points when using photography and point sampling techniques]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[An. Inst. Invest. Mar. Punta de Betín]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>19</volume><volume>20</volume>
<page-range>205-208</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparing k-dominance curves: yet another suggestion]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[An. Inst. Invest. Mar. Punta de Betín]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>122-128</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salzwedel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Recruitment patterns of sessile invertebrates onto fouling plates in the Bay of Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[An. Inst. Invest. Mar. Punta de Betín]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>30-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gotelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Stochastic models of gregarious larval settlement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ophelia]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero><numero>2</numero>
<issue>1</issue><issue>2</issue>
<page-range>95-108</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Green]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schoener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corets]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Succession on marine hard substrata: the adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies in temperate fouling communities]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mar. Ecol.- Prog. Sen]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>121-129</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grosberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Seasonal, annual and spatial variation in the development of hard-bottom communities]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Helgol. wissenschaft. Meeresuntersuch.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<page-range>137-150</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hatcher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johannes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robertson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Review of research relevant to the conservation of shallow tropical marine ecosystems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev.]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>337-414</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Interaction of physical and biological processes in the settlement of planktonic larvae]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bull. Mar. Sci.]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>202-212</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.B.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Competition on marine hard substrata: the adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Amer. Nat.]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<page-range>743-767</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. B.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Habitat area, colonization, and development of epibenthic community structure]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keegan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cidigh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boaden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.J.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biology of benthic organisms]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<page-range>349-357</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pergamon Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. B.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Morphological strategies of sessile animals]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larwood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biology and systematics of colonial organisms]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<page-range>499-553</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keough]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Occupation of patches in the epifaunal communities on pier pilings and the bivalve Pinna bicolor at Edithburg, South Australia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<page-range>123-130</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Spatial relationships and some structring processes in benthic intertidal communities]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Exper. Mar. Biol. Ecol.]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>139-155</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keough]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of patch size on the abundance of sessile marine invertebrates]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<page-range>423-437</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ludwig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reynolds]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Statistical ecology: A primer on methods and computing]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<page-range>337</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[John Wiley and Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Aspects of stress in the tropical marine environment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Advan. Mar. Biol.]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>217- 269</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarrete]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Barnacle walls as mediators of intertidal mussel recruitment: effects of patch size on the utilization of space]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<page-range>113-119</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Okamura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Formation and disruption of aggregations of Mytilus edulls in the fouling community of San Francisco Bay, California]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>275-282</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Osman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The stablishment and development of a marine epifaunal community]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecol. Monogr.]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<page-range>37-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Recruitment of barnacles into empty adult test]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>142</volume>
<page-range>63-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Russ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Overgrowth in a marine epifaunal community: competitive hierarchies and networks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oecologia]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>12-19</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Poriferengesellschaften an einer Hafenmole in Santa Marta, Kolumbien, unter dem Einflussunterschiedlicher Lichtexposition]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<page-range>210</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schoener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Long]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DePalma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Geographic variation in artificial island colonization curves]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>367-382</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sebens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Competition for space: growth rate, reproductive output and scape in size]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Amer. Nat.]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>120</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>189-197</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<page-range>312</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Tokio ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simberloff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Equilibrium theory of island biogeography and ecology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann. Rev. Ecol. System.]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>161-182</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sousa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Experimental investigations of disturbance and ecological succession in a rocky intertidal algal community]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecol. Monog.]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>227-259</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sousa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Disturbance and patch dynamics on rocky intertidal shores]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pickett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.T.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[White]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<page-range>101 -124</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutherland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Multiple stable points in natural communities]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Amer. Nat.]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>108</volume>
<page-range>859-873</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutherland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Functional roles of Schizoporella and Styela in the fouling community at Beafort, North Carolina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<page-range>257-264</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutherland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Dynamics of the epibenthic community on roots of the mangrove Rhizophora mangle, at Bahía de Buche, Venezuela]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mar. Biol.]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<page-range>75-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutherland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina: a study in stability]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Amer. Nat.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>499-519</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sutherland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karlson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecol. Monog.]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<page-range>425-446</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ten Hove]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Different causes of mass occurrence in serpulids]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larwood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<page-range>281-298</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academic Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Todd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CD.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecology of intertidal and sublittoral cryptic epifaunal assemblages. II: Nonlethal overgrowth of encrusting bryozoans by colonial ascidians]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>115</volume>
<page-range>113-126</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Facilitation as a successional mechanism in a rocky intertidal community]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Amer. Nat.]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>121</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>729-738</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Underwood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev.]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<page-range>513-605</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vandermeulen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dewreede]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The influence of orientation of an artificial substrate (transite) on settlement of marine organisms]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ophelia]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>41-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Selection of predator-free settlement sites by larval ascidians]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ophelia]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>132-140</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gotelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Larval predation by barnacles: effects on patch colonization in a shallow subtidal community]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>624-634</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cameron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Differential predation by barnacles upon larvae of two bryozoans: spatial effects at small scales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>128</volume>
<page-range>283-294</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Esponjas del Caribe Colombiano]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<page-range>286</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Catalogo Científico]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
