<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0122-9893</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Derecho del Estado]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Derecho Estado]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0122-9893</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Externado de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0122-98932019000300057</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18601/01229893.n44.04</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Justicia constitucional, deliberación y democracia en Colombia: Jeremy Waldron reflexivo en Bogotá]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Judicial review, deliberation and democracy in Colombia: Jeremy Waldron hesitates in Bogotá]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROA ROA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JORGE ERNESTO]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Externado de Colombia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>44</numero>
<fpage>57</fpage>
<lpage>98</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0122-98932019000300057&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0122-98932019000300057&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0122-98932019000300057&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN Este artículo contesta el argumento de Jeremy Waldron en contra de la revisión judicial de las leyes. La tesis principal del artículo es que las cuatro condiciones waldronianas (core of the case) necesarias para que exista una sociedad bien ordenada son demasiado exigentes para el sistema democrático de Colombia. Por esa razón, las objeciones formuladas por Waldron al control de constitucionalidad no son aplicables al caso colombiano. Solo una interpretación excesivamente minimalista de las cuatro condiciones de una sociedad core of the case permitiría aplicar esa crítica al control de constitucionalidad en Colombia. Además, el artículo mantiene que el argumento de Waldron resulta afectado por una paradoja. Esta consiste en que una interpretación exigente de las cuatro condiciones del core of the case deja fuera a la mayor parte de las democracias del mundo. Por el contrario, una interpretación flexible de esas condiciones aumenta el potencial aplicativo de las objeciones waldronianas, pero les resta fuerza. El artículo demuestra que, en contextos que apenas satisfacen las cuatro condiciones bajo mínimos, el control de constitucionalidad puede resultar necesario y útil para el propio sistema democrático con el fin de superar las cargas de inercia y los puntos ciegos del proceso legislativo que afectan la protección efectiva de los derechos constitucionales. En estos casos, los jueces ordenan remedios directos que no pueden ser objeto de reproche democrático en virtud de que el propio legislador ha defraudado las expectativas respecto del rol que le corresponde dentro de la organización política.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT Regarding the Jeremy Waldron's argument against judicial review of legislation, the article concludes that the four conditions (core of the case) necessary for a well-ordered society are too demanding for the Colombian democratic system. For this reason, Waldron's objections to the judicial review are not applicable to the Colombian case. Only an excessively minimalist interpretation of the core of the case society would allow to apply this criticism to the judicial review of legislation in Colombia. In addition, Waldron's argument faces a paradox: a demanding interpretation of the four conditions (core of the case) leaves out most of the world's democracies. To the contrary, a flexible interpretation of these conditions increases the potential application of Waldron's objections but reduce its power. In contexts that barely meet the four minimum conditions, judicial review of legislation may be necessary and useful for the democratic system itself to overcome the inertial burdens and blind spots of the legislative process that undermines the effective protection of constitutional rights. That means that even the core of the case democracies can fail due to the existence of inertial burdens and blind spots. These problems generate situations of violation or under-protection of rights that can be remedied through judicial review. In these cases, judges order direct remedies that cannot be criticized because the legislator himself is below expectations according to its role within the political organization.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Democracia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[deliberación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[legitimidad democrática]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[control de constitucionalidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Jeremy Waldron]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cargas de inercia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[puntos ciegos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Democracy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Deliberation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Democratic Legitimacy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Judicial Review]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Jeremy Waldron]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Inertial Burdens]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Blind Spots]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ACKERMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[We The People. Foundations]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BARROSO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reason without vote: The representative and majoritarian function of constitutional courts]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUSTAMANTE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONÇALVES FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Democratizing Constitutional Law. Perspectives on Legal Theory and the Legitimacy of Constitutionalis]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>71-90</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Suiza ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAYON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Democracia y derechos: problemas de fundamentación del constitucionalismo]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARBONELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARCÍA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El canon neoconstitucional]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>285-355</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Trotta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BAZÁN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Control de las omisiones inconstitucionales e inconvencionales]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fundación Konrad Adenauer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BERNAL PULIDO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Unconstitutional constitutional amendments in the case study of Colombia: An analysis of the justification and meaning of the constitutional replacement doctrine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Constitutional Law]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>339-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOGDANDY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[V. Ius constitutionale commune en América Latina: una mirada a un constitucionalismo transformador]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Derecho del Estado]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>3-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CASSELS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Judicial activism and public interest litigation in India: Attempting the impossible?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The American Journal of Comparative Law]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>495-519</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CEPEDA ESPINOSA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Polémicas constitucionales]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Legis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CEPEDA ESPINOSA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. j]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Judicial activism in a violent context: The origin, role, and impact of the Colombian Constitutional Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Washington University Global Studies Law Review]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>537-700</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CHRISTIANO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Waldron on law and disagreement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Law and Philosophy]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>513-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DIXON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Creating dialogue about socioeconomic rights: Strong-form versus weak-form judicial review revisited]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Constitutional Law]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>391-418</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DWORKIN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Igualdad, democracia y Constitución. Nosotros, el Pueblo, en los tribunales]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARBONELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARCÍA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El canon neoconstitucional]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>117-49</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Trotta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ELSTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[j]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ulysses and the Sirens. Studies in Rationality and Irrationality]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CAmbridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ELSTER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[j]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CAmbridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FALLON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The core of an uneasy case for judicial review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>121</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1693-736</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERRERES COMELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Una defensa de la rigidez constitucional]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doxa: Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<numero>23</numero>
<issue>23</issue>
<page-range>29-47</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERRERES COMELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El Tribunal Constitucional ante la objeción democrática: tres problemas]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Jurisdicción constitucional y democracia. Actas de las XVI Jornadas de la Asociación de Letrados del Tribunal Constitucional]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
<page-range>11-42</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Tribunal Constitucional y Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERRERES COMELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El control judicial de la constitucionalidad de la ley. El problema de su legitimidad democrática]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARBONELL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARCÍA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El canon neoconstitucional]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>356-80</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Trotta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARCÍA-VILLEGAS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[UPRIMNY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DE SOUSA SANTOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Democratizar a democracia: os caminhos da democracia participativa]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>297-335</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Río de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Civilização Brasileira]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARDBAUM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CAmbridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HAMILTON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MADISON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[j.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JAY]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[j]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Federalist Papers]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Dover Publications]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KUMM]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Democracy is not enough: Rights, proportionality and the point of judicial review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<numero>09-10</numero>
<issue>09-10</issue>
<page-range>1-38</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LANDAU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Political institutions and judicial role in comparative constitutional law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard International Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>319-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LINARES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La (i)legitimidad democrática del control judicial de las leyes]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NIEMBRO ORTEGA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Las respuestas legislativas a las declaraciones de inconstitucionalidad como forma de diálogo constitucional]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<numero>95</numero>
<issue>95</issue>
<page-range>139-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROA ROA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[j. E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La acción pública de constitucionalidad a debate]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROA ROA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[j. E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El modelo de constitucionalismo débil y la legitimidad de la justicia constitucional en Colombia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CORREA HENAO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROBLEDO SILVA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Diseño institucional del Estado democrático en América Latina]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>113-36</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Externado de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[STONE SWEET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SUÁREZ RICAURTE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El derecho a la consulta previa de las comunidades indígenas, étnicas y tribales y la minería en Colombia. Una lectura a partir del derecho al territorio indígena]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HENAO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[j. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONZÁLEZ ESPINOSA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Minería y desarrollo. T. IV, Minería y comunidades: impactos, conflictos y participación ciudadana]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>331-75</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Externado de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TUSHNET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How different are Waldron's and Fallon's core cases for and against judicial review?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>49-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TUSHNET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Derecho constitucional crítico y comparado]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARGARELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NIEMBRO ORTEGA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Constitucionalismo progresista: retos y perspectivas]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>1-14</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[IIJ, UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TUSHNET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Alternative forms of judicial review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Michigan Law Review]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>101</volume>
<page-range>2781-802</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[UPRIMNY YEPES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Constitutional Court and the control of presidential extraordinary powers in Colombia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLOPPEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARGARELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SKAAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Democratization and the Judiciary]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<page-range>33-49</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Frank Cass]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[UPRIMNY YEPES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The enforcement of social rights by the Colombian Constitutional Court: Cases and debates]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARGARELLA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DOMINGO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ROUX]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies. An Institutional Voice for the Poor?]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>127-51</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[UK ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ashgate]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WALDRON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martí]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quiroga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Derecho y desacuerdos]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WALDRON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The core of the case against judicial review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Yale Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<numero>115</numero>
<issue>115</issue>
<page-range>1346-406</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WALDRON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Revisión judicial dialógica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<page-range>1-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WALDRON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Control de constitucionalidad y legitimidad política]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dikaion]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>7-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WALDRON]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Control de constitucionalidad y legitimidad política]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Conferencia impartida en la Corte Constitucional de Colombia]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
