http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v16n1.44279

ARTÍCULO DE INVESTIGACIÓN

Influence of 6-Benzyladenine and gelling agent on the reduction of hyperhydricity in Tectona grandis L.

Running title: Controlling hyperhydricity in teak

Influencia de la 6-Bencilaminopurina y el agente gelificante en la reducción de la hiperhidricidad en Tectona grandis L.

Elisa Quiala^1,2, Marco V. Jiménez-Tello¹, Raúl Barbón¹, Maité Chávez¹, Manuel de Feria1, Mariana La O¹ y Marta Pérez¹.

¹ Instituto de Biotecnología de Las Plantas, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas.
² Carretera a Camajuaní Km 5½, Santa Clara, Cuba. *Corresponding author (elisa@ibp.co.cu), Tel 5342 281257, Fax 53 42 281329. E-mail: Marcos V. Jiménez-Tello: elisa@ibp.co.cu, Raúl Barbón: raulb@ibp.co.cu, Maité Chávez: raulb@ibp.co.cu, Manuel de Feria: mdeferia@ibp.co.cu, Mariana La O: mariana@ibp.co.cu, Marta Pérez: martha@ibp.co.cu

Abstract

The influence of different factors on shoot proliferation and the occurrence of hyperhydricity in teak (Tectona grandis L.) have been studied. Four concentrations of BA (2.22, 4.44, 6.66 and 8.88 µM) and a control treatment with 0 BA were examined. Aiming at reducing the costs during commercial propagation by using gelrite in stead of agar, the use of both gelling agent in the proliferation and hyperhydricity was tested. In order to evaluate if hyperhydricity can be reduced by increasing the gelrite concentration in the culture medium, three concentrations (2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 g L^-1) were tested in combination with 4.44 µM BA. The proliferation and occurrence of hyperhydricity during 21 successive subcultures were evaluated. The highest proliferation was achieved in the treatments with 6.66 or 8.88 µM BA. They yielded 5.22 and 5.56 shoots/explant, respectively. But also, the highest percent of hyperhydric shoots was achieved in this treatment. Gelrite resulted in a higher proliferation, but also an almost two times higher hyperhydricity as compared to agar-solidified media. Satisfactory reduction in hyperhydricity (18%) was achieved with 3.0 g L^-1 gelrite. However, the successive subcultures onto proliferation in this treatment favored hyperhydricity compromising shoot quality and it´s competence to proliferate. in vitro teak plants were ex vitro rooted and then transferred to greenhouse conditions for acclimatization; ten weeks after transfer they were ready for field plantation.

Palabras clave: cytokinin, forestry, micropropagation, morpho-physiological disorder, teak

Resumen

Se estudió la influencia de diferentes factores en la proliferación y la ocurrencia de la hiperhidricidad in teca (Tectona grandis L.). Se probaron cuatro concentraciones de BA (2,22; 4,44; 6,66 and 8,88 µM) y un control sin BA. Con el objetivo de reducir los costos durante la propagación comercial se experimentó sustituir el agar por el gelrite, para lo cual se estudió en efecto de ambos gelificantes en la proliferación y la hiperhidricidad de los brotes. Se estudiaron, tres concentraciones de gelrite (2,0; 2,5 and 3,0 g L^-1) combinadas con 4,44 µM BA, con el objetivo de evaluar si la hiperhidricidad podía ser reducida incrementando la concentración de gelrite. Se evaluó la proliferación de brotes y la ocurrencia de la hiperhidricidad durante 21 subcultivos. Se logró una alta proliferación de brotes en los tratamientos con 6,66 y 8,88 µM BA (5,22 y 5,56 brotes), pero el porcentaje de brotes hiperhídricos también se incrementó. El gelrite resultó en una alta proliferación de brotes, pero con mayor incidencia de la hiperhidricidad que el medio gelificado con agar. Se obtuvo una reducción satisfactoria de la hiperhidricidad (18%), cuando la concentración de gelrite se incrementó hasta 3,0 g L^-1. No obstante, la multiplicación de los brotes en este tratamiento más allá del 11no subcultivo favoreció la hiperhidricidad, lo que afectó la calidad de los brotes y su competencia para la proliferación. Las plantas fueron enraizadas ex vitro, transferidas a condiciones de invernadero para su aclimatización y diez semanas después de la transferencia estaban listas para la plantación en campo.

Key words: citoquinina, forestal, micropropagación, desorden morfo-fisiológico, teca

Introduction

Tectona grandis L. (teak) grows naturally throughout southeastern Asia and is one of the most valuable tropical hardwood species on the international market (Gyves et al., 2007). Teak has been introduced into Central America (Panamá) in 1926 from Colombo (Sri Lanka) and in the following 20 years it was naturalized in almost all countries of Central America and the Caribbean (De Camino et al., 1998). Teak is traditionally propagated through seeds and cuttings. However, due to low efficiency of traditional propagation methods to satisfy the high demand of teak, in vitro propagation has become an efficient way to produce teak plants as uniform as possible, on a large scale and in a short period of time (Monteuuis et al., 1998; Daquinta et al., 2001; Tiwari et al., 2002; Yasodha et al., 2005; Gyves et al., 2007). However, sometimes the shoot quality is impaired by the occurrence of hyperhydricity (Castro et al., 2002).

Hyperhydricity is induced by the combined action of several physical and/or chemical factors of the culture environment (Gaspar, 1991). Although most plants can adapt to these environmental conditions, some of them become abnormal with a translucent aspect due to chlorophyll deficiency and high water content (Debergh, 1983; Gaspar, 1991). The phenomenon has been considered as a morpho-physiology disorder and many physiological and biochemical changes have been observed (Ziv, 1991; Franck et al., 2004). Some of these factors include the presence in the medium of growth regulators, of large quantities of NH4+ and Cl- ions, the type and concentration of the gelling agent, high relative humidity in the culture vessels (Debergh et al., 1983; Ziv, 1991; Kevers et al., 2004; Hazarika, 2006) and the successive subcultures of the explants in a culture medium with cytokinin (Vieitez et al., 1985).

Gelling agents are not an ''inert'' medium component, and their type and concentration have a significant effect on the performance of tissue cultured plant material (Debergh, 1983; Ziv, 1991; Pereira-Netto et al., 2007), including the occurrence of hyperhydricity (Franck et al., 2004).

Gelrite is a product derived from bacteria (Pseudomonas elodea) with consistent quality and high purity. Because substantially smaller quantities produce gels of hardness comparable to agar, gelrite appears to be an economically good gelling substitute for agar (Ivanova and Van Staden, 2010).

The successive subcultures of tissue cultured plant material for a long period of time can lead to a declining of proliferation rate and the occurrence of hyperhydricity (Vieitez et al., 1985; Gómez et al., 2007). Because the efficiency of commercial micropropagation, among others factors, are often determined by the number of plants produced from the initial explant, it is indispensable to know how many subcultures can be carried out during the proliferation stage without compromising the proliferation rate and plant quality.

After a meticulous revision in the literature about the in vitro commercial propagation of teak, no one research refers the evaluation of the proliferation of shoot up to the 7th subculture. Otherwise, although several research results have been described to overcome hyperhydricity, in various species, using different strategies such the evaluation of gelling agent type and concentration (Debergh et al., 1981; Franck et al., 2004; Ivanova et al., 2006; Ivanova and Van Staden, 2011), no experience with teak has been reported.

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal concentration of BA to improve teak shoot proliferation (shoots/explants) with low occurrence of hyperhydricity (%). In order to reduce commercial propagation costs, the potential of gelrite and its most proper concentration as a possible replacement of agar was assessed, with special emphasis on achieving high proliferation and low occurrence of hyperhydricity. The study also aims at determining the maximum number of subcultures that can be carried out using the selected combination of BA and gelrite concentration and the development of the micro-propagated plants under ex vitro conditions.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and culture conditions

Apical shoots from plants cultured in the greenhouse and cloned from epicormic shoots of 30-year-old teak trees from Cuba were cut off. Shoots were surface-sterilised with ethanol (70% v/v) for 30 s. After rinsing three times with sterile distilled water, explants were dipped in a water solution containing 2% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2 ml Tween-80 for 10 min, followed by three rinses in sterile distilled water. The explants were then singly placed in test tubes (25 mm × 150 mm) with 10 ml of full-basal MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) medium supplemented with BA (4.44 µM), sucrose (2%; w/v), and solidified with 2.0 g L^-1 gelrite (Duchefa Biochemie, NL) to induce bud sprouting.

The pH was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving. After 48 hours, in vitro shoots were transferred to fresh medium to reduce browning. After 30 days the established apical shoots were transferred to the multiplication stage. The micropropagation cycle consisted of a monthly subculture of nodal segments after the removal of the new in vitro shoots onto a fresh medium to produce a large number of in vitro shoots. The cultures were incubated at 25±2ºC with a 16 h light (fluorescent lamps with photon lux light intensity of 40 µmol m^-2s^-1).

Eight in vitro shoots were cultured per 25 ml of solid medium, distributed in a 250 ml glass culture container and there were ten replicates (flasks). Three experiments were conducted; each one was repeated three times. For all experiment each treatment comprised 80 explants. After 4 wks of culture, 40 explants were used to evaluate proliferation (number of shoots/explant) and occurrence of hyperhydricity (%) (n=120). The number of shoots per explant (proliferation) was recorded. The newly-formed shoots were classified as normal shoots or hyperhydric shoots, according to their external appearance and the hyperhydricity (%) was calculated. Hyperhydric shoots had thicker, glassy and watery appearance compared to normal shoots.

Effect of BA concentration

In the first experiment, the established apical shoots (figure 1A) were placed onto the multiplication medium. Four concentrations of BA (2.22, 4.44, 6.66 and 8.88 µM) and a control treatment with 0 BA were assessed. The conventional basal MS medium was supplemented with sucrose (2%; w/v), 100 mg L^-1 myo-inositol and solidified with agar (6.6 g L^-1).

Effect of gelling agent type

In the second experiment, two types of gelling agent were compared: agar and gelrite (Duchefa Biochemie, NL) at concentrations of 6.6 and 2.0 g L^-1 respectively, resulting in the same gel hardness of the media. The gel hardness was determined according to Huang et al., 1995. The basal MS medium was supplemented with sucrose (2%; w/v), 100 mg L^-1 myo-inositol and 4.44 µM BA.

Effect of gelrite concentration

In the third experiment, three concentrations of gelrite (2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 g L^-1) were tested. The basal MS medium was supplemented with sucrose (2%; w/v), 100 mg L^-1 myo-inositol and 4.44 µM BA.

Effect of the number of subcultures

Ex vitro rooting and acclimatization

For ex vitro rooting and acclimatization 40 teak shoots (>2.5 cm long) were harvested at the end of the 11^th subculture. Shoots were washed with running tap water and the basal callus was cutting. Shoots were ex vitro rooting according to Quiala et al. (2012), before being inserted into the substrate. The shoots were then planted in plastic containers (70 hole of 121 cm³ capacity) and filled with an organic matter (humus and sugarcane mill baggasse): Zeolite (1:1) mixture. Once planted, the shoots were placed in a greenhouse (30 ± 2ºC, RH 90%) and maintained under 50% shade with intermittent-mist water sprays to avoid damage due to desiccation. The frequency of survival was recorded after 4 weeks. Ten weeks after transfer the plants were ready for field plantation.

Statistical analysis

The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Prior to statistical analysis, the hyperhydricity (%) data were transformed into arcsine to improve the normality of the data distribution. The significance of differences was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significant (P<0.05) differences among mean values were estimated by Fisher´s LSD. All statistical tests were performed by SigmaStat software version 3.11. The data are presented as means ± standard error, and different letters in the tables and figures indicate significant differences at P<0.05. The data presented in percentages were subjected to arcsine transformation before analysis, and then converted back to percentages for presentation in the tables and graphics. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design.

Results

Effect of BA concentration

Shoot proliferation was observed with all tested BA concentrations (table 1). On media with 2.22 µM BA, an average of 2.84 shoots per explant was produced, also the lowest percent of hyperhydricity was achieved (table 1). Compared to the control, the higher proliferation of shoot was obtained when explants were grown on a medium containing either 6.66 or 8.88 µM BA, yielding 5.22 and 5.56 shoots per explant, respectively. However, the occurrence of hyperhydricity was also higher (25 and 35%, respectively).

The best results on shoot proliferation were achieved on media with 4.44 µM BA since an average of 4.88 shoots per explant was produced (table 1), similar to the treatments with 6.66 µM BA, but with lower occurrence of hyperhydricity (15%) (table 1).

In this experiment the potential of gelrite as a possible replacement of agar was assessed with special emphasis on achieving high proliferation and low occurrence of hyperhydricity. As such commercial propagation costs could be reduced.

Significant differences associated with the used gelling agent were observed after 4 weeks of culture. Shoot proliferation was significantly higher with gelrite (4.84 shoots per explant) than with agar (3.70 shoots per explant). However, hyperhydricity was almost two times higher (34%) with gelrite as compared to agar-solidified media (16%; table 2).

Effect of gelrite concentration

The increase of gelrite concentration from 2.0 to 2.5 g L^-1 or 3.0 g L^-1 did not affect the multiplication; significant reduction was no detected (table 3). Increasing the gelrite concentration reduced hyperhydricity. However, a significant reduction (18.1%) was achieved only at 3.0 g L^-1 gelrite (table 3).

Effect of the number of subcultures

Shoot proliferation increased from the 1^st to the 5^th subculture (3.1 to 6.0 shoots per explant). Proliferation remained similar from the 6^th to 11^th subculture, ranging between 6.2 and 5.9 shoots per explant (figure 2A), while no significant increment of hyperhydricity were recorded from the 1^st to the 11^th subculture (figure 2B), ranging between 16.1 to 18.6%. However; more than 11 successive subcultures onto proliferation media with 4.44 µM BA and 3.0 g L^-1gelrite resulted in low proliferation (figure 2B) and high hyperhydricity from the 12^th to the 21^st subculture. A ranging between 27.3 to 53.1% of the new shoots was hyperhydric. Furthermore, while healthy shoots with dark green color were majorly observed from the 1^st to 11^th subculture (figure 2B), from the 15^th to the 21^st subculture (figure 2B), whole explants, including all new shoots, with translucent and glassy appearance and a pale green-brown color (figure 1C).

in vitro shoots from the 11^th subculture produced new leaves within 15 days. Shoots surviving one month after planting (figure 1 D). Treating shoots with an IBA (492.1 µM) solution for 2 min resulted in 75% rooting. Ten week after transfer plants were ready for field plantation (figure 1E).

Discussion

Effect of BA concentration on multiplication and hyperhydricity

In general, increasing the concentration of BA from 2.22 to 8.88 µM increased shoot proliferation, but the frequency of hyperhydricity also increased. According to the literature, BA is the most commonly used cytokinin in micropropagation of teak, alone or combined with kinetin or auxin (Monteuuis et al., 1998; Gangopadhyay et al., 2002; Tiwari et al., 2002; Yasodha et al., 2005; Gyves et al., 2007; Akram and Aftab 2009). Hyperhydricity during tissue culture of teak has already been reported by Castro et al. (2002). They refer to the best results on shoot proliferation (2.5 shoots/explant) with 2.22 µM BA, with low occurrence of hyperhydricity (5%). Similar to our results, the authors point out that a higher concentration of BA results in higher proliferation but also in higher hyperhydricity. Goswami et al. (1999) suggested using a basal MS solid medium supplemented with BA and kinetin for teak shoot multiplication, achieving a mean of 3.7 normal shoots per explant in 8 weeks after subculture; but the number of hyperhydric shoots was not reported. Tiwari et al. (2002) showed that placement of the explants in MS medium supplemented with BA (22.2 µM) and a subsequent elongation step with 22.2 µM BAP + 0.25 µM IAA resulted in the maximum number of shoots after 8 weeks of culture. Although the BA concentration was high, the authors do not refer to the occurrence of hyperhydricity. Gyves et al. (2007) reported a high number of shoots for teak (4 shoots/explant) after 4 weeks of culture. They took steps to overcome hyperhydricity problems by modifying the MS medium (reducing the ammonium quantity) and by adding pectin (from grape must) to reduce the water content in the medium and by adding auxin and giberelin. According to general observations, these changes probably contributed to the improvement of the culture quality reducing visual hyperhydricity symptoms. However, although these techniques solve the hyperhydricity problems, the addition of pectin and a complex mix of three regulators of growth certainly increase the cost of commercial teak propagation.

Although the mechanism for hyperhydricity remains to be elucidated, it might take place during the axillary bud multiplication stage and has been correlated, among other factors, with the relatively high cytokinin level in the culture medium (Debergh 1983; Hazarika 2006). It has been reported that cytokinin induces hyperhydricity in many species, usually in a concentration-dependent manner and when other conditions in the culture system are not optimized (Ivanova et al., 2006; Moncaleán et al., 2009).

Effect of gelling agent type on hyperhydricity and multiplication

Agar was found to better control hyperhydricity than gelrite. The low frequency of hyperhydricity on a medium with agar might be due to a sulphated galactan in agar (Nairn et al., 1995), being able to control hyperhydricity. However, agar is expensive (Huang et al., 1995). From an economical point of view, during commercial propagation the gelling agent represents almost 90% of one unit (1 l) of culture medium (Pérez et al., 2000).

Gelrite promotes hyperhydricity in teak and similar results have been found with various species (Franck et al., 2004; Ivanova and Van Staden, 2010). The hypothesis about the effect of gelrite on hyperhydricity seems to be related to its physical structure as supported by Ivanova et al., (2006). They found that higher levels of endogenous cytokinins were detected in shoots of A. polyphylla grown on gelrite media than those grown on agar-gelled media.

Shoot formation was higher on a medium gelled with gelrite as compared to agar. Similar results were reported for Malus domestica (Pasqualetto et al., 1988), Allium cepa (Jakse et al., 1996) and Scrophularia yoshimurae (Tsay et al., 2006). However, in agreement with Ivanova and Van Staden, (2010), we assumed that this effect of the gelling agent on the proliferation rate appears to be species-specific because more shoots were produced on media with agar of A. polyphylla.

Increasing gelrite concentration reduced hyperhydricity. Different authors refer to a similar positive effect of controlling hyperhydricity by increasing gelrite concentration in woody species such as Picea abies (Bornman and Vogelmann, 1984) and Malus spp. (Pasqualetto et al., 1988). However, in contradiction to our results, they refer to a negative effect on shoot proliferation. In our results, a negative side effect of the gelrite concentration was not observed, maybe because the amount of gelrite added from one treatment to another was low. Similar results were also reported for A. polyphylla (Ivanova and Van Staden, 2010). These authors report that increasing the gelrite concentration, and so decreasing the water availability in the media, reduced significantly the occurrence of hyperhydricity. However, in contradiction to their results, we did not achieve a negative side effect of this approach for shoot regeneration since no statistical differences were detected at p<0.05 level.

Effect of the number of subculture on multiplication and hyperhydricity

The successive subcultures onto proliferation media with 4.44 µM BA and 3.0 g L^-1gelrite of more than the 11^th one resulted in low proliferation and high hyperhydricity. Similar results were reported for Castanea sativa Mill (Vieitez et al., 1985). These authors pointed to a negative effect of growth regulators on hyperhydricity and low proliferation rate upon an increasing number of subcultures. A poor shoot multiplication was found with Chimonanthus praecox where the amount of viable tissue persistently decreased with each subculture (Kozomara et al., 2008). The quantity of Eucalyptus globulus shoots decreased from the 3^rd to the 6^th subculture when shoots were successively subcultured every 50 days on a proliferation medium with 4.44 µM BA and 0.05 µM naphthalene acetic acid (ANA) (Gómez et al., 2007).

Apparently, in vitro teak shoots are displaying various degrees of hyperhydricity. Some of them do not show macro-morphological perceptible changes, but the subculture of this type of shoot for a long time to new vitrifying conditions (culture medium with BA and gelrite) may lead to over-accumulate severe morpho-physiological disorder, reducing proliferative competition and quality. According to Kevers et al. (2004), the process of hyperhydricity is generally considered as reversible. The authors point out that the hyperhydric state (of newly formed shoots) can also be maintained through several subcultures without too much change, but subculturing hyperhydric shoots in vitrifying conditions may lead to severe damage, including death of the whole shoot as such, through apparent necrosis of all primary meristems.

From the result, the costs during commercial propagation of teak could be reduced by using gelrite in stead of agar, but the advantage is limited since the successive subculture more than 11^th subculture affects the shoots quality and its competition to proliferate. Because the often cultures transferred to freshly media with agar and lower cytokinin concentrations successfully recover from hyperhydricity, alternating the subculture of teak shoots into agar-gelled medium + 4.44 µM BA and gelrite-gelled medium + 2.22 µM BA, could be a solution for achieve high shoot proliferation controlling hyperhydricity upon the 11^th subculture passage.

Ex vitro rooting and acclimatization

A high survival rate was observed with ex vitro rooted teak shoots. Rooting is one of the most difficult steps in micropropagation of woody species, and forest rooting is usually performed ex vitro because of the low frequency of in vitro rooting. in vitro rooting is often preferred because plants perform much better in terms of plant quality as they have the advantage of already possessing roots during the acclimatization phase (De Klerk, 2002). However, ex vitro rooting of teak is attractive because of the simultaneous rooting and hardening of plants. It also cuts the cost of production significantly (Tiwari et al., 2002).

In this study, we achieved a frequency of survivor of 75%, but in an earlier study, we found that it is possible to enhance the quality of teak plants obtained from solid culture, by using a temporary immersion system with 0 or with 2.22 µM BA in the last subculture of the multiplication stage, achieving a high frequency of survivor (96.7 and 91.7%, respectively) during acclimatization (Quiala et al., 2012).

In conclusion, the present study shows that even though BA is indispensable for the in vitro propagation of teak, high concentrations of this cytokinin result in more occurrence of hyperhydricity. Otherwise, the type of gelling agent is critical for controlling hyperhydricity during in vitro propagation of teak. When agar was substituted with gelrite, a high proliferation was achieved, but hyperhydricity also increased. By increasing gelrite concentration to 3.0 g L^-1 was an effective strategy for reduce hyperhydricity without affecting shoot proliferation, but maintaining the explants in this conditions (4.44 µM BA + gelrite) during successive subcultures enhance hyperhydricity.

We would like to express particular thanks to Rafael Gómez Kosky and Idalmis Caraballoso for critical review of the manuscript. We are also grateful to Oswald Van Cleemput for his kind help in revising the English language. This research was supported by the Cuban Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (CITMA).

References

1 Akram M., Aftab F. 2009. An efficient method for clonal propagation and in vitro establishment of softwood shoots from epicormic buds of teak (Tectona grandis L.). For Stu China. 11: 105-110.         [ Links ]

2 Bornman C.H., Vogelmann TC. 1984. Effect of rigidity of gel medium on benzyladenine-induced adventitious bud formation and vitrification in vitro in Picea abies. Physiol Plant. 61:505-512.         [ Links ]

3 Castro D., Díaz G., Linero J. 2002. Propagación clonal in vitro de árboles élites de teca (Tectona grandis L.). Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología. 4:49-53.         [ Links ]

4 Daquinta M., Ramos L., Capote I., Lezcano Y., Rodríguez R., Trina D., Escalona M. 2001. Micropropagación de la teca (Tectona grandis L.F.). Comunicación técnica. Revista Forestal Centroamericana. 25-28         [ Links ]

5 De Camino, RV, Alfaro, MM, Sage, LFM. 1998. Teak (Tectona grandis) in Central America, Forest Plantations Working Papers. Roma, IT, FAO. 64 p. (Working Paper FP/19). http://intranet.catie.ac.cr/intranet/posgrado/CopiadeBB506SilvBosques/semana2/ArticuloTeca FAO.pdf . Consultado el 12 de agosto de 2009.         [ Links ]

6 De Klerk GJ. Rooting of microcuttings: theory and practice. 2002. in vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 38:415-422.         [ Links ]

7 Debergh PC, Harbaoui Y, Lemeur R. 1981. Mass propagation of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus): Evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol Plant. 53: 181-187.         [ Links ]

8 Debergh P.C. 1983. Effects of agar brand and concentration on the tissue culture medium. Physiol Plant. 59:270-276.         [ Links ]

9 Franck T., Kevers C., Gaspar T., Dommes J., Deby C., Greimers R., Serteyn D., Deby-Dupont G. 2004. Hyperhydricity of Prunus avium shoots cultured on gelrite: a controlled stress response. Plant Physiol Biochem. 42: 519-527.         [ Links ]

10 Gangopadhyay G., Das S., Mitra S.K., Poddar R., Modak B.K., Mukherjee K.K. 2002. Enhanced rate of multiplication and rooting through the use of coir in aseptic liquid culture media. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 68:301-310.         [ Links ]

11 Gaspar T. 1991. Vitrification in micropropagation, in: Y.P.S. Bajaj (Ed.), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, High-Tech and Micropropagation I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 17: 117-126.         [ Links ]

12 Gómez C., Ríos D., Sánchez-Olate M. 2007. Efecto del subcultivo sucesivo sobre la caulogénesis adventicia de Eucalyptus globulus. Bosque. 28:13-17.         [ Links ]

13 Goswami H., Keng C.L., Teo C.K.H. 1999. in vitro shoot proliferation of Tectona grandis L. Journal Bioscience. 10:47-54.         [ Links ]

14 Gyves, E. M., Juwartina I., Royani J. I., Rugini E. 2007. Efficient method of micropropagation and in vitro rooting of teak (Tectona grandis L.) focusing on large-scale industrial plantations. Annals of Forest Scice. 64: 73-78.         [ Links ]

15 Hazarika B.N. 2006. Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture of plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 108:105-120.         [ Links ]

16 Huang L-C., Kohashi C., Vangundy R., Murashige T. 1995. Effects of common components on hardness of culture media prepared with gelrite. in vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant. 31:84-89.         [ Links ]

17 Ivanova M., Novák O., Strnad M., Van Staden J. 2006. Endogenous cytokinins in shoots of Aloe polyphylla cultured in vitro in relation to hyperhydricity, exogenous cytokinins and gelling agents. Plant Growth Regulation. 50:219-230.         [ Links ]

18 Ivanova M., Van Staden J. 2008. Effect of ammonium ions and cytokinins on hyperhydricity and multiplication rate of in vitro regenerated shoots of Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 92:227-231.         [ Links ]

19 Ivanova M., Van Staden J. 2010. Influence of gelling agent and cytokinins on the control of hyperhydricity in Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 104:13-21.         [ Links ]

20 Jakse M., Bohanec B., Ihan A. 1996. Effect of media components on the gynogenic regeneration of onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivars and analysis of regenerants. Plant Cell Rep. 15:934-938.         [ Links ]

21 Kevers C., Franck T., Strasser R.J., Dommes J., Gaspar T. 2004. Hyperhydricity of micropropagated shoots: a typically stress-induced change of physiological state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 77:181-191.         [ Links ]

22 Kozomara B., Vinterhalter B., Radojevic Lj., Vinterhalter D. 2008. in vitro propagation of Chimonanthus praecox (L.), a winter flowering ornamental shrub. in vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 44:142 - 147.         [ Links ]

23 Moncaleán P., Fal M.A., Castañón S., Fernández B., Rodríguez A. 2009. Relative water content, in vitro proliferation, and growth of Actidiana deliciosa plantlets are affected by benzyladenine. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci. 37:351-359.         [ Links ]

24 Monteuuis O., Bon M., Goh D. 1998. Teak propagation by in vitro culture. Bois et Forets des Tropiques. 226:1-11.         [ Links ]

25 Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 15: 473 - 497.         [ Links ]

26 Nairn B.J., Furneaux R.H., Stevenson T.T. 1995. Identification of an agar constituent responsible for hydric control in micropropagation of radiata pine. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 43:1-11.         [ Links ]

27 Pasqualetto P-L, Zimmerman R.H., Fordham I. 1988. The influence of cation and gelling agent concentrations on vitrification of apple cultivars in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 14:31-40.         [ Links ]

28 Pereira-Netto A.B., Petkowicz C.L.O., Cruz-Silva C.T.A., Gazzoni M.T., Mello A.F.P., Silveira J.L.M. 2007. Differential performance of marubakaido apple rootstock shoots grown in culture media containing different agar brands: dynamic rheological analysis. in vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 43:356-363.         [ Links ]

29 Pérez J.N., Suárez M., Orellana P. 2000. Posibilidades y potencial de la Propagación Masiva de Plantas en Cuba. Biotecnología Vegetal. 1: 3-12.         [ Links ]

30 Quiala E., Cañal M.J., Meijón M., Rodríguez R., Chávez M., Valledor L., de Feria M., Barbón R. 2012. Morphological and physiological responses of proliferating shoot of teak to temporary immersion and BA treatments. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 109:223-234.         [ Links ]

31 Tiwari S.K., Tiwari K.P., Siril E.A. 2002. An improved micropropagation protocol for teak. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 71:1-6.         [ Links ]

32 Tsay H-S., Lee C-Y., Agrawal DC., Basker S. 2006. Influence of ventilation closure, gelling agent and explant type on shoot bud proliferation and hyperhydricity in Scrophularia yoshimurae-a medicinal plant. in vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 42:445-449.         [ Links ]

33 Vieitez A., Ballester A., San José M., Vieitez E. Anatomical and chemical studies of vitrified shoots of chestnut regenerated in vitro. Physiol Plantarum. 65: 177-184, 1985.         [ Links ]

34 Yasodha R., Sumathi R., Gurumurthi K. 2005. Improved micropropagation methods for teak. J Trop For Sci. 17:63-75.         [ Links ]

35 Ziv M. 1991. Vitrification: morphological and physiological disorders of in vitro plants. In: Debergh PC, Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation: technology and application. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp 45-69.         [ Links ]