<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0123-4870</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Folios]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Folios]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0123-4870</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Pedagógica Nacional ]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0123-48702021000200231</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17227/folios.54-12234</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El Kant de Heidegger]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Heidegger's Kant]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[O Kant Heidegger]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tillería Aqueveque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leopoldo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Tecnológica de Chile Inacap ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>54</numero>
<fpage>231</fpage>
<lpage>246</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0123-48702021000200231&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0123-48702021000200231&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0123-48702021000200231&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Este artículo de reflexión sugiere algunas notas a la crítica que Heidegger hiciera a Kant en su célebre Kant y el problema de la metafísica de 1929. De esta forma, se discuten los alcances de la observación heideggeriana en cuanto a que en la deducción trascendental de su primera crítica, Kant habría retrocedido ante el descubrimiento de la imaginación como fundamento del conocimiento ontológico. Incorporando las recepciones de Zizek, Castoriadis y Martínez Marzoa, se corrobora que el mérito de Heidegger es reconocer que, en la deducción trascendental, Kant habría dudado entre la psicología y la lógica, al no haber visto ninguna tercera alternativa, terminando por descartar su apego a la subjetividad y optando por una versión lógica "al estilo escolástico". Finalmente, se conjetura que el retroceso del filósofo de Konigsberg no fue ante el descubrimiento del fundamento, sino en realidad ante la posibilidad de una interpretación fenomenológica del mundo.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This reflection article suggests some notes to Heidegger's critique of Kant in his famous Kant and the problem of metaphysics of 1929. The scope of Heidegger's observation is discussed in that in the transcendental deduction of his first critique, Kant would have retreated before the discovery of the imagination as the foundation of ontological knowledge. Incorporating the receptions of Zizek, Castoriadis and Martínez Marzoa, it is corroborated that Heidegger's merit is to recognize that in the transcendental deduction Kant would have hesitated between psychology and logic, having not seen any third alternative, ending up discarding his attachment to subjectivity and opting for a logical version "scholastic style". Finally, it is conjectured that the retreat of the Konigsberg philosopher was not before the discovery of the foundation, but actually in the face of the possibility of a phenomenological interpretation of the world.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo O artigo de reflexão sugere algumas notas à crítica de Heidegger sobre Kant em seu famoso Kante o problema da metafísica de 1929. O escopo da observação de Heidegger é discutido na medida em que na dedução transcendental de sua primeira crítica Kant teria recuado antes da descoberta da imaginação como base do conhecimento ontológico. Incorporando as recepções de Zizek, Castoriadis e Martínez Marzoa, é corroborado que o mérito de Heidegger é reconhecer que na dedução transcendental Kant teria hesitado entre psicologia e lógica, não tendo visto nenhuma terceira alternativa, acabando descartando seu apego à subjetividade e optando por uma versão lógica "estilo escolástico". Finalmente, é suposto que a regressão do filósofo de Konigsberg não foi antes da descoberta da fundação, mas na verdade diante da possibilidade de uma interpretação fenomenológica do mundo.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[crítica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[filosofía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[imaginación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[metafísica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tiempo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[criticism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[philosophy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[imagination]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[time]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[crítica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[filosofia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[imaginação]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[metafísica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[tempo]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aldegani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ontología y política. Análisis y observaciones de la filosofía de Cornelius Castoriadis]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de La Plata]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barreto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ontologia e Crítica da metafísica: Kant e Heidegger]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Estudos Filosóficos]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>18-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brandt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La cuarta crítica de Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Azafea]]></source>
<year>(200</year>
<month>6</month>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>181-208</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Heidegger on Kant on transcendence]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crowell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malpas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Transcendental Heidegger]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>28-42</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Stanford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castoriadis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Figuras de lo pensable]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cátedra]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dahlstrom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Being at the beginning: Heidegger's interpretation og Heraclitus]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dahlstrom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[InterpretingHeidegger: critical essays]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<page-range>135155</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fayé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Heidegger. La introducción del nazismo en la filosofía]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akal]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferraris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La imaginación]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Visor]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferraris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Goodbye, Kant!]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Suny Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freudiger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kants Schlu&amp;tein. Wie die Teleologie die Einheit der Vernunft stiftet [La piedra angular de Kant. Cómo la teleología crea la unidad de la razón]]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Studien]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>423-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garrido]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La fuerza configuradora de la imaginación en el tiempo de la autoafección de la mismidad: Kant y Heidegger]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Veritas]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>9-27</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez-Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sum moribundus versus sum trascendens: El debate sobre la conciencia en Heidegger y Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>149-66</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grondin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La actualidad de la religión dentro de los límites de la mera razón de Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ideas y Valores]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>113</numero>
<issue>113</issue>
<page-range>80-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heidegger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[GA 3]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Fráncfort del Meno ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Klostermann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heidegger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant y el problema de la metafísica]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fondo de Cultura Económica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heidegger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ser y tiempo]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universitaria]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heidegger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Principios metafísicos de la lógica]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Síntesis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holguín de Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La interpretación heideg-geriana del esquematismo en Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ideas y Valores]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>62</numero>
<issue>62</issue>
<page-range>81-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón pura]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Alfaguara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Marzoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Desconocida raíz común]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Visor]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Marzoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Heidegger y su tiempo]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akal]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Matías]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant más allá de Kant: Heidegger y lo no-pensado de la filosofía kantiana]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Con-Textos Kantianos]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>128-58</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Massey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The origin of time: Heidegger and Bergson]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Suny Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papadimitropoulos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The radical freedom of the imaginary in Castoriadis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cosmos &amp; History]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>24-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pardon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La antropología como fundamento de la metafísica: la crítica de Heidegger en Kant y el problema de la metafísica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[X Jornadas de Investigación en Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 19 a 21 de agosto de 2015]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pedrol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La filosofía política de Cornelius Castoriadis]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Barcelona]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poole]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant, Heidegger and the problem of indifference: from reason to releasement]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of British Columbia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Aramayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón ucrónica. Estudios en torno a las aporías morales de Kant]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Tecnos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schalow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The unique role of logic in the development of Heidegger's dialogue with Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the History of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>103-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sicerone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La crítica de 2izek a la concepción del sujeto en clave historicista]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Reflexiones Marginales]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<page-range>1-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Trascendental y trascendencia en Heidegger]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Sevilla]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La idea de lo trascendental en Heidegger]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kronos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stepanenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Deducción trascendental de los conceptos puros del entendimiento. (Crítica de la razón pura , 1a. ed., A95-A130)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ideas y Valores]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>127</volume>
<page-range>99-126</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La interpretación fenomenológica de la "triple síntesis" de Kant en Kant y el problema de la metafísica de Martin Heidegger]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Resonancias. Revista de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>30-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villacañas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Racionalidad crítica. Introducción a la filosofía de Kant]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Tecnos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zizek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El espinoso sujeto]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Paidós]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
