<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0124-0064</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista de Salud Pública]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. salud pública]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0124-0064</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Salud Publica, Facultad de Medicina - Universidad Nacional de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0124-00642005000100001</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Dengue and dengue and vector behaviour in Cáqueza, Colombia, 2004]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Comportamiento del dengue y del vector en Cáqueza, Colombia, 2004]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez G.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hernán]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De La Hoz R.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fernando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Secretaría de Salud de Cundinamarca  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional. Colciencias Departamento de Salud Pública ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>15</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0124-00642005000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0124-00642005000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0124-00642005000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[OBJECTIVE: Describing the behaviour of dengue and its vector in Cáqueza, Colombia (1 746 masl) by serological, entomological and virological monitoring between March and June 2004. METHODS: Two types of study were carried out. One was a cross-sectional study for serologically monitoring the population and taking entomological indicators; participants were selected from the general population by random conglomerate sampling. The second study consisted of monitoring febrile cases suspected of dengue during a four-week period. Vector behaviour (bite-rate and hours of activity) was also included by using the landing-on-humans technique; a rubbish-collecting day was run during the same period for evaluating this intervention’s short-term effectiveness. RESULTS: Total prevalence of infection by dengue (IgG positive) was 23,3 % in 252 people examined in the surveyed population. Household infestation index was 32,9 %; deposit index was 8,4 %; and Breteau index was 43,9. Following the rubbish-collection day, the infestation index became reduced by 56 % (14,5 % post-intervention), deposit index by 43 % (4,8 % post-intervention) and Breteau index by 59 % (17,9 % post-intervention). Two of the febrile patients (n=83) were IgM positive. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that dengue’s urban vector can reach dangerous levels of infestation above 1 700 masl; however, a deeper study of its bionomy is needed at these heights above sea-level during different times of the year for improving knowledge regarding climatic and environmental factors affecting their efficiency as vector in these conditions.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[OBJETIVO: Describir el comportamiento del dengue y su vector en Cáqueza, Colombia, (1 746 msnm), mediante vigilancia serológica, entomológica y virológica, entre Marzo y Junio de 2004. MÉTODOS: Se realizaron dos tipos de estudio: Un estudio de corte transversal para la vigilancia serológica poblacional y el levantamiento de los indicadores entomológicos donde los participantes fueron seleccionados de la población general por muestreo aleatorio de conglomerados. El segundo estudio fue de vigilancia centinela sobre casos febriles sospechosos de dengue durante cuatro semanas, incluyendo el comportamiento del vector (tasa de picadura y horas de actividad) mediante la técnica de aterrizaje sobre el humano. Durante el mismo periodo se realizó una jornada de aseo lo que permitió evaluar la efectividad a corto plazo de esta intervención. RESULTADOS: La prevalencia total de infección por dengue (IgG positivos) fue de 23,3 % en 252 personas examinadas en la encuesta poblacional. El índice de infestación de viviendas fue de 32,9 %, el índice de depósito fue de 8,4 % y el de Bretau de 43,9. Después de la jornada de aseo el índice de infestación se redujo en un 56 % (14,5 % post intervención), el de depósito disminuyó en un 43 % (4,8 % post intervención) y el de Bretau en un 59 % (17,9 post intervención). Entre los pacientes febriles (n=83) dos fueron positivos para IgM. CONCLUSIONES: El estudio sugiere que aunque hay presencia del vector, la transmisión interepidémica de dengue es baja en esta población. Con respecto al vector es importante porque hay pocos estudios del comportamiento del dengue en poblaciones por encima de 1 500 metros en Latinoamérica.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Aedes aegypti]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[seroprevalence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[sentinel surveillance]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[entomology]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[l indicators]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Colombia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Aedes aegypti]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[seroprevalencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[vigilancia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[centinela]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[indicadores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[entomológía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Colombia]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>ART&Iacute;CULOS/INVESTIGACI&Oacute;N</B></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="4" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Dengue and dengue    and vector behaviour in C&aacute;queza, Colombia, 2004 </B></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Comportamiento    del dengue y del vector en C&aacute;queza, Colombia, 2004</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Hern&aacute;n    Rodr&iacute;guez G.<SUP>I</SUP>; Fernando De La Hoz R. <SUP>II</sup></b></font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><SUP>I</sup>M&eacute;dico    Cirujano. M. Sc. Salud P&uacute;blica, Especialista en Epidemiolog&iacute;a.    Secretar&iacute;a de Salud de Cundinamarca. E-mail: <a href="mailto:mamanu123@hotmail.com">mamanu123@hotmail.com</a>    <br>   <SUP>II</sup>M&eacute;dico Cirujano. Ph. D. Epidemiolog&iacute;a, M. Sc. Epidemiolog&iacute;a.    Departamento de Salud P&uacute;blica. Universidad Nacional. Colciencias. E-mail:    <A HREF="mailto:fdelahoz@colciencias.gov.co">fdelahoz@colciencias.gov.co</A></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>ABSTRACT</b>    &nbsp;</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>OBJECTIVE:</b>    Describing the behaviour of dengue and its vector in C&aacute;queza, Colombia    (1 746 masl) by serological, entomological and virological monitoring between    March and June 2004.     <br>   <B>METHODS:</b> Two types of study were carried out. One was a cross-sectional    study for serologically monitoring the population and taking entomological indicators;    participants were selected from the general population by random conglomerate    sampling. The second study consisted of monitoring febrile cases suspected of    dengue during a four-week period. Vector behaviour (bite-rate and hours of activity)    was also included by using the landing-on-humans technique; a rubbish-collecting    day was run during the same period for evaluating this intervention’s short-term    effectiveness.    <br>   <B>RESULTS:</b> Total prevalence of infection by dengue (IgG positive) was 23,3    % in 252 people examined in the surveyed population. Household infestation index    was 32,9 %; deposit index was 8,4 %; and Breteau index was 43,9. Following the    rubbish-collection day, the infestation index became reduced by 56 % (14,5 %    post-intervention), deposit index by 43 % (4,8 % post-intervention) and Breteau    index by 59 % (17,9 % post-intervention). Two of the febrile patients (n=83)    were IgM positive.     <br>   <B>CONCLUSIONS:</b> The study showed that dengue’s urban vector can reach dangerous    levels of infestation above 1 700 masl; however, a deeper study of its bionomy    is needed at these heights above sea-level during different times of the year    for improving knowledge regarding climatic and environmental factors affecting    their efficiency as vector in these conditions.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Key Words</b>:    <I>Aedes aegypti</I>, seroprevalence, sentinel surveillance, entomology,l indicators,    Colombia (<I>source: MeSH, NLM</I>).</font><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>    </b></font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>RESUMEN</b></font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <B>OBJETIVO:</b>    Describir el comportamiento del dengue y su vector en C&aacute;queza, Colombia,    (1 746 msnm), </font><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">mediante    vigilancia serol&oacute;gica, entomol&oacute;gica y virol&oacute;gica,&nbsp;    entre Marzo y Junio de 2004.    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <B>M&Eacute;TODOS:</b> Se realizaron dos tipos de estudio: Un estudio de corte    transversal para la vigilancia serol&oacute;gica poblacional y el levantamiento    de los indicadores entomol&oacute;gicos donde los participantes fueron seleccionados    de la poblaci&oacute;n general por muestreo aleatorio de conglomerados. El segundo    estudio fue de vigilancia centinela sobre casos febriles sospechosos de dengue    durante cuatro semanas, incluyendo el comportamiento del vector (tasa de picadura    y horas de actividad) mediante la t&eacute;cnica de aterrizaje sobre el humano.    Durante el mismo periodo se realiz&oacute; una jornada de aseo lo que permiti&oacute;    evaluar la efectividad a corto plazo de esta intervenci&oacute;n.    <br>   <B>RESULTADOS:</b> La prevalencia total de infecci&oacute;n por dengue (IgG    positivos) fue de 23,3 % en 252 personas examinadas en la encuesta poblacional.    El&nbsp; &iacute;ndice de infestaci&oacute;n de viviendas fue de 32,9 %,&nbsp;    el &iacute;ndice de dep&oacute;sito fue de 8,4 %&nbsp; y el de Bretau de 43,9.    Despu&eacute;s de la jornada de aseo el &iacute;ndice de infestaci&oacute;n    se redujo en un 56 % (14,5 % post intervenci&oacute;n), el de dep&oacute;sito    disminuy&oacute; en un 43 % (4,8 % post intervenci&oacute;n) y el de Bretau    en un 59 % (17,9 post intervenci&oacute;n). Entre los pacientes febriles (n=83)    dos fueron positivos para IgM.     <br>   <B>CONCLUSIONES:</b> El estudio sugiere que aunque hay presencia del vector,    la transmisi&oacute;n interepid&eacute;mica de dengue es baja en esta poblaci&oacute;n.    Con respecto al vector es importante porque hay pocos estudios del comportamiento    del dengue en poblaciones por encima de 1 500 metros en Latinoam&eacute;rica.&nbsp;</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Palabras Clave</b>:    <I>Aedes aegypti</I>, seroprevalencia, vigilancia, centinela, indicadores, entomol&oacute;g&iacute;a,    Colombia (<I>fuente: DeCS, BIREME</I>).</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">It has been calculated    that 50 to 100 million cases of dengue and that (depending on the year) from    250,000 to 500,000 cases of hemorrhagic dengue occur each year around the world.    Average yearly lethality rate is around 5% and most cases of death caused by    dengue occur amongst children and young adults.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The incidence of    classical dengue in Colombia since 1978 has fluctuated, having a tendency to    increase, rising from 17,389 cases in 1997 to 81,831 in 2002. The same behaviour    has been observed for hemorrhagic dengue (less than 5 000 in 1998 to 5 500 cases    in 2002) (1). Behaviour for the Cundinamarca department has similarly increased,    rising from 800 cases of classical dengue in 2000 to 2 161 in 2003. There has    also been an important occurrence of 150 and 300 cases of hemorrhagic dengue    per year between 2001 and 2003 (2).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Various dengue    epidemics have occurred since 1970 following re-infestation by <I>Aedes aegypti</I>    in Colombia, with the four serotypes circulating throughout the country. These    four dengue serotypes are currently circulating throughout Colombia, though    not having the same intensity. The dengue 2 virus was isolated in 1971 and has    been circulating since then with dengue 1. Dengue 4 began to circulate in 1984    and has continued to circulate since then to date. Dengue 3 circulated for a    short period during the mid-1970s, disappearing for several years and reappearing    in the Santander department in 2001 (1).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">&nbsp; The main    vector of dengue in Colombia is <I>Aedes aegypti, </I>its dissemination being    limited by altitude. It has been found in Colombia at altitudes of up to 2 200    metres above sea-level (masl), where annual temperature is 17ºC. This altitude    is higher than the maximum internationally reported in India (2 121 masl). In    spite of it being known that it can exist at these altitudes, its behaviour    is not well-known above 1 500 metres.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> The current investigation    was carried out to elucidate dengue epidemiological behaviour and that of its    vector in C&aacute;queza (in the Cundinamarca department), lying at 1 746 masl    where the vector was found for the first time in 2003; however, no information    regarding the virus’ autochthonous circulation has been available to date. Data    collected during this study could help in elucidating the behaviour of dengue    and its vector at high altitude.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><FONT size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>MATERIALS AND    METHODS</b></font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Study site</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">C&aacute;queza    is a town having a population of 21 000 inhabitants, 63 % of them living in    the municipality’s urban area. Its average temperature is 21°C. It is situated    near several municipalities, which have reported autochthonous dengue in the    past.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Types of study</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">A cross-sectional    study was carried out for serological monitoring of the population and taking    entomological indicators. A serological sentry monitoring system was set up    for determining the incidence of dengue in patients presenting the disease’s    acute symptoms. The short-term effectiveness of a rubbish-collecting day was    also determined by recording entomological indexes following the intervention.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sampling methods    for the entomological and serological survey </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Multistage conglomerate    sampling was done for determining seroprevalence and entomological indicators.    30 conglomerates were thus randomly selected from the urban area and 10 households    were chosen from each town-block during a second stage. The urban map of C&aacute;queza    had to be modified as the most up-to-date had been drawn up in 1998 and it was    seen that the number of houses per block had increased. A cadastral engineer    was enlisted to help in redesigning the cartographic plans. Once the changes    had been made (and bearing the forgoing in mind), the map was then divided into    sectors, then successively into barrios, blocks and houses. The percentage of    houses per block was very unequal in some cases respecting other blocks; for    example, one block had 10 houses whilst most had between 24-30 houses. The foregoing    meant that blocks having such a low number of houses were grouped for levelling    them out with the others. 35 conglomerates were finally left. 30 blocks and    the households within each block were chosen to be studied by using a list of    random numbers generated by Epitable software (EPIINFO 6.04). A total of 274    houses was visited, an average of 8 houses per block. 36 houses could not be    surveyed because they were closed or because the inhabitants did not wish to    be visited.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> The most used    variables in the serological survey were: block, age, gender, completed years    of schooling, social security, travelling outside C&aacute;queza, using mosquito-netting,    the main symptoms of dengue, previous diagnosis of dengue, sample-taking and    Ig-G result.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Pre- and post-rubbish-collection    day entomological monitoring</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><I>Aedes</i> indexes    were constructed on two occasions. An initial one was taken for determining    housing, deposit and Breteau percentages. Another index was taken later, helped    by the mayor’s office, following a rubbish-collection day. This was done after    making the community aware of the need for collecting waste items, washing reservoirs,    covering deposits, etc. The vector-born disease (VBD) helper and/or entomologist    evaluated the different low deposits (reservoirs, drums, buckets or other recipients)    and high deposits where the inhabitants kept their water (covered or uncovered    water tanks), as well as diverse deposits where water collected, such as cans,    tyres, jar/pots, bottles, plants, etc. </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The following indicators    were analysed:</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Housing index (larval):    positive houses / inspected houses x 100 %;</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Deposit index:    positive deposits / inspected deposits x 100 %; and</font></p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Breteau index:    positive deposits / inspected houses x 100 houses inspected.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sentry serological    monitoring in patients having a clinical picture compatible with dengue</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">This was done for    4 weeks between June and July by processing 24 patients’ samples per week. Sample    screening was calculated with 95 % reliability for detecting 30 % prevalence,    assuming that at least 3 were positive (3). The reference population consisted    of people residing in C&aacute;queza’s urban area consulting San Rafael hospital’s    outpatient services (sentry centre) for symptoms compatible with dengue and    who had been living in dengue endemic areas during the 10 days prior to consultation.    </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Defining a febrile    case</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">This would have    been a patient who had consulted as he/she had presented temperature greater    than or equal to 38 °C, having at least 5 days’ evolution and having lived for    more than 10 days in the area, plus the following signs and symptoms:</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">General: chills,    photophobia, prostration, discomfort and diaphoresis;    <br>   Osteo-muscular: arthralgia and myalgia;    <br>   Gastrointestinal: nausea, vomiting, anorexia, diarrhoea and abdominal pain;    <br>   and    <br>   Hemorrhagic: haematemesis, epistaxis, ecchymosis, haemoptysis, melena.    <br>   Samples were taken for IgM if the above conditions were complied with.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Inclusion criteria</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The following criteria    were taken into account:</font></p> <ul>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Patients being      aged more than 5, fulfilling case criteria;</font></li>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Presenting probable      signs and symptoms of dengue; and</font></li>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Wishing to participate      in sentry monitoring.</font></li>     </ul>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Exclusion criteria</font></p> <ul>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The following      criteria were taken into account:</font></li>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Oral temperature      less than 38 <SUP>o</SUP>C; </font></li>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Having a febrile      picture with more than 3 weeks’ evolution;</font></li>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Being aged less      than 5;</font></li>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Visible causes      of another infectious disease (tonsillitis, acute respiratory infection, media      otitis, etc); and</font></li>       <li><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The lack of      authorisation by the patient or person consulting hospital services for a      blood-sample to be taken.</font></li>     </ul>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Landing-on-humans    technique </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The vector’s bionomy    was also studied, bearing in mind its behaviour, hours of peak-activity, bite    rate, etc. Conditions for collecting, sending and transporting samples to the    Cundinamarca Public Health Laboratory strictly adhered to the protocol established    by the Laboratory’s Entomology Unit. The format for remitting samples was similarly    filled in specifying the date of capture, place, gender, collector’s name and    identification on the collecting-flask coinciding with the date of having been    sent to the laboratory. </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Adult mosquitoes    which had been collected were killed with cold / cigarette smoke and then carefully    packed in plastic boxes to be sent to the public health laboratory to be read    by the entomologist (careful packing was stressed for ensuring that basic structures    were not lost for later taxonomic identification).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">6 visits were made    to the town accompanied by a VBD assistant having experience in this activity.    4 nights were spent in the following sites from 6 pm to 6 am: Hospital San Rafael    de C&aacute;queza, the Departmental gardens and two private houses.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Time was spent    in the two following places during the day from 8 am to 6 pm: Hospital San Rafael    de C&aacute;queza and the Departmental gardens.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Sample-taking</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Random serum sampling    (only 1 inhabitant per household) was done for the seroprevalence survey (anti-dengue    IgG) for a total of 253 samples. Those people were identified who had had symptoms    compatible with dengue during the last year. A serum sample was taken on day    6 and then on from cases having had an acute febrile clinical picture (sentry    monitoring) during the last 10 days for processing them for anti-dengue IgM    (giving a total of 83 patients). Written informed consent was always asked and    given for both types of monitoring when collecting and processing samples.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The following recommendations    were taken into account (7): </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">10 ml blood was    obtained and placed in a sterile tube without anticoagulant;</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Samples were then    left to coagulate at room temperature for a period of at least 30 minutes and    not more than 2 hours until coagulum became completely retracted;</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Samples were then    centrifuged at 3 000 rpm for 20 minutes; and Serum samples were finally put    into duly labelled (name and date sample was taken) sterile screw-topped tubes    in aseptic conditions.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sample conservation    and transport </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Samples were sent    as soon as possible in refrigerated conditions to the Cundinamarca Public Health    Laboratory where they were processed by the bacteriologist responsible for this    area, using Tecnosuma kits. Each batch of samples was accompanied by its respective    laboratory order. </font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>RESULTS</B></font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Data was collected    using instruments designed for such purpose. Survey population data, such as    that for the sentry population, was loaded using EpiInfo software (version 3.2.2)    and then exported to SPSS (version 12) for respective analysis.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Serologically monitoring    the population </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">75,6 % (95 % CI=70,3;    80,7) of the total of 253 people surveyed were female. Ages ranged from 6 to    85 (µ=39,6 years old, 95 % CI=37,4; 41,8). 38 % of the people were affiliated    to the subsidised health insurance regime (n=101), 37,8 % were affiliated to    their contributory regime (n=99) and 23 % (n=60) were not affiliated to the    Colombian General Social Security in Health System.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The average of    years spent living in the town was 27,4 (95 % CI=24,9; 29,9), ranging from 1    to 82 years. 66 % of the people had been outside the town during the last year    (n=173). Only 7.9% of the population surveyed used a mosquito-net when sleeping    (n=20).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">There was 23,3    % (95 % CI=18; 28) (n=59) prevalence of infection caused by dengue (IgG positive),    whilst 28,8 % of those positive for Ig-G had had symptoms of dengue during the    last year (95 % CI=17,9; 42,8).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">It was found that    the p value was not statistically significant for either bivariable or multivariable    analysis when measuring association between being infected by dengue and some    independent variables such as travelling or not having been outside C&aacute;queza,    using or not using a mosquito-net, having or not having had symptoms of dengue    and prevalence of dengue per block. The exception was the last independent variable    (OR: 1.06; 95% CI=1.04; 1.07; p &lt; 0.001), i.e. having other people infected    on a town block was significantly related to the probability of being infected    by dengue.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Pre-rubbish-collection-day    entomological monitoring </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Total larval index    per block was 32,9 % (95 % CI=31,02; 35,0), ranging from 0 % to 66,6 %, 30 %    mean. Total deposit index was 8,3 % (95 % CI=9,0; 10,4), ranging from 0 % to    24,2 %, 8,6 % mean. Total Breteau index was 43,2 (95 CI=40,2; 46,2), ranging    from 0 to 100, 42,8 mean.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="/img/revistas/RSAP/v7n1/a01tab01.gif">Table    1</a> shows how positive a breeding place was according to type of breeding    place. Being positive was higher in lower tanks (28 %) pre-rubbish-collecting    day than the most numerous breeding place following it. An important reduction    could be observed in being positive in lower tanks post-rubbish-collecting day    whilst no reduction took place in other types of breeding place; on the contrary,    being positive increased in some cases. </font></p>     <p> <FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Post rubbish-collection-day    entomological monitoring </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Total larval index    was 14,5 % (95 % CI=10,8; 19,1), ranging from 0 % to 44,4 %, 11,1 % mean. There    was 56 % reduction respecting pre-rubbish-collecting day indexes.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Total deposit index    was 4,8 % (95 % CI=3,5; 6,2) ranging from 0 % to 28 %, 4,6 % mean. There was    a 43 % reduction following the rubbish-collecting day. Total Breteau index was    16,7 (95% CI=12.8; 21.6), ranging from 0 to 63,6, 12,5 mean. There was 59 %    reduction respecting pre-rubbish-collecting day indexes.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="#tab02">Table    2</a> shows distribution by gender and specie of larvae captured between February    2004 and August 2005. It can be seen that <I>Aedes aegypti </I>was the most    frequently identified gender, followed by <I>Culex quinquefasciatus</I>. Least    captures were made during June.</font></p>     <p><a name="tab02"></a></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/RSAP/v7n1/a01tab02.gif"></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Rate of landing-on-humans    </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="/img/revistas/RSAP/v7n1/a01tab03.gif">Table    3</a> shows the places, times, date and type of capture of adult male and female    Aedes <I>aegypti</I> and <I>Culex Sp. Aedes aegypti</I> never circulated at    night; captures coincided with daylight hours and dusk, as one would expect    with this vector. 62 % to 90 % relative humidity was observed during daylight    captures and temperature ranged from 21 ºC to 34 ºC. There was 82 % to 100 %    humidity during the nights, this value coinciding with hours of rainfall and    temperature ranging from 17 ºC to 26 ºC.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Adults captured    by using the landing-on-humans method (both intra- and peri-domicilium were    <I>Culex sp</I>; <I>Aedes aegypti</I> were only captured at rest. The bite-per-hour    rate was 4 adults per hour for <I>Culex, </I>being registered in the peridomicilium    from 18:00-19:00 and 21:00-22:00.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sentry monitoring    of febrile cases</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">83 cases of fever    compatible with dengue were studied. 59 % of them were women; minimum age was    5 years, maximum being 85, average 29,7 years old (95% CI=26,3-33).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">34,9 % of patients    had been beyond C&aacute;queza during the last 10 days (n=29). Endemic-epidemic    sites for dengue which they had been to were: Villavicencio, Restrepo, Cartagena,    Carmen de Apical&aacute;, Guayabetal, Melgar, Ibagu&eacute;, Girardot and Vichada.    The most representative site was Villavicencio which 12 residents had been to    as tourists and for business.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The main signs    and symptoms reported by patients in the sentry monitoring process were fever    (100 %), headache (95,1 %), bodily pain (87,9 %) and exanthema (83,1 %).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Two patients proved    positive for IgM (2,4 %). The first (aged 42), had not been beyond C&aacute;queza    during the 10 days before onset of symptomatology. Ig-M had been taken 8 days    after the onset of symptoms. The other case (aged 33) had also not been outside    the town during the previous 10 days. The sample had been taken 5 days after    onset of symptoms. Both cases stated that they had visited Villavicencio three    months previously; however, they only referred to having had recent symptoms    of dengue leading to them consulting sentry monitoring.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>DISCUSSION</B></font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Studies carried    out in Colombia during the last 25 years have corroborated finding the vector    above 1 600 masl, as has happened in Fusagasug&aacute; (Cundinamarca) lying    at 1 728 masl and M&aacute;laga (Santander) at 2 200 masl (4). This means that    the presence of the <I>Aedes aegypti</I> vector in the municipality of C&aacute;queza    (1 741 masl) shows that this mosquito has been becoming adapted to altitudes    greater than 1 500 masl during recent years. Public and private means of transportation,    accelerated processes of urbanisation and man’s intervention are amongst the    main causes of the vector’s propagation and distribution (5).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The level of dengue’s    seroprevalence (23,3 %) and the vector’s high infestation rate suggest that    dengue has been transmitted in C&aacute;queza; this, added to the fact of being    a town attracting the tourist trade, makes the risk of inter-epidemic transmission    become high. Seroprevalence levels found in Caqueza were lower then those found    in Girardot (289 masl), i.e. 89 % (6). On the other hand, they were slightly    higher than those found in Medell&iacute;n (1 538 masl), i.e. 16,3 % (7). Seroprevalence    has been found to be 33 % in Colima, M&eacute;xico (490 masl) (8). </font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The high percentage    of inhabitants engaging in unsuitable practices for controlling dengue must    be stressed. Inhabitants in 75 % of households were used to hoarding a lot of    waste items (cans, bottles, jar/pots, tyres), to not cleaning low deposits suitably    and leaving them open (uncovered), thus making both aspects into the main risk    factors for <I>Aedes aegypti</I> proliferation<I>. </I>Reservoirs and tyres    represent the best larval habitat, whilst bedrooms are adult mosquitoes’ preferred    habitat (9).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Other sectors of    the municipality such as municipal educational centres, the hospital and cemetery    aid the vector’s growth and proliferation due to the presence of elements (flower    vases, jar/pots, tyres) containing stagnant water for long periods of time.    Areas in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, have remained positive for <I>Aedes aegypti    </I>such as scholastic concentrations and other places due to their immediate    environmental conditions being predisposed towards oviposture (10).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Another important    aspect in the spread of the vector’s presence to surrounding rural areas is    due to their closeness to the urban area allowing <I>Aedes aegypti</I> to travel    to these neighbouring territories. This vector’s dispersion by flight is very    limited when compared to other mosquito species. 100-metre flight dispersion    is considered rare, but it has been shown that a pregnant female can fly up    to 3 km to deposit her eggs (11).</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">One of the study’s    strengths was that 83% of samples collected during the five months spent collecting    larvae corresponded to <I>Aedes aegypti</I>; this fact shows the VBD assistants    level of training which contributed towards constructing the indexes.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">One of this study’s    important limitations was revealed by scant adult <I>Aedes aegypti</I> captures    by the landing-on-humans method for determining their behaviour and bionomy.    Captures were also made at rest, contrasting with collecting adult <I>Culex    sp</I>, which was much greater, using the same technique. Capturing mosquitoes    when they alight on humans and bite them represents a sensitive means of detecting    low-level infestations, but requires a lot of personnel. Both male and female    <I>Aedes aegypti</I> mosquitoes are attracted to human-beings and, bearing in    mind that males present low dispersion indexes, their presence could thus be    a trustworthy indicator of the proximity of hidden breeding-places.</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The rubbish-collection    day and mass awareness-raising campaign, together with training and prevention    activities run with the community, an important reduction was shown in most    households’ infestation indexes, even more so when these activities were concentrated    in higher risk deposits. The 3 entomological indexes ostensibly became reduced    by between 43 % and 59 %; low deposits’ positivity percentages importantly diminished    post-rubbish-collecting day.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">As sentry monitoring    for IgM (finding low sero-reactivity) was only carried out for four weeks, this    represented another limitation. This leads to it being thought that this type    of monitoring should be done periodically (four-monthly) together with virological    monitoring (which could not be carried out in this study) to be alert to the    imminence of an outbreak of dengue. Even though the latter type of monitoring    is essential, it has been demonstrated that viral isolation is minimal when    epidemics happen (12). This study has shown that dengue’s urban vector can reach    dangerous infestation levels in places lying above 1 700 masl. However, its    bionomy must be studied more deeply at these altitudes during different times    of the year for improving knowledge regarding climatic and environmental factors    affecting its efficiency as a vector in such conditions ·</font></p>     <p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>Acknowledgements</b>.    We would like to thank A Victor Olano from the Instituto Nacional de Salud,    the people working in the Cundinamarca Public Health Laboratory (especially    Pilar Carrillo and F&eacute;lix Ruiz), the Tecnosuma Laboratory (especially    Le&oacute;n Dovale Dur&aacute;n and Patricia Mu&ntilde;oz), health workers in    Hospital San Rafael de C&aacute;queza, the Mayor’s office in C&aacute;queza,    VBD assistants, William Le&oacute;n and everyone else who has helped in carrying    out this study.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><B>REFERENCES</B></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1. Mera C, Garc&iacute;a    I, Velandia M, Bernal M, Cede&ntilde;o D, Serna MT et al. Sistema de vigilancia    sindr&oacute;mica sobre enfermedades febriles transmitidas por vectores, con    &eacute;nfasis en fiebre amarilla, dengue y malaria en los departamentos de    Guaviare, Putumayo, Caquet&aacute; y Norte de Santander, 2002. Inf Qinc Epidem    Nac 2003; 8(5):74-83.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000127&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2. S&aacute;nchez    JF. Las jornadas departamentales, una estrategia fundamental para la prevenci&oacute;n    y control del dengue. Bolet&iacute;n Epidemiol&oacute;gico de Cundinamarca 2002;    3 (1):55-65.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000128&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">3. Lwanga S, Lemeshow    S. Determinaci&oacute;n del tama&ntilde;o de las muestras en los estudios sanitarios.    WHO.1991. p.65.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000129&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">4. Suarez MF, Nelson    MJ. Registro de altitud del <I>Aedes aegypti</I> en Colombia. Biom&eacute;dica    1981; 1(4):225. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000130&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">5. Tauil P. Urbanization    and dengue ecology. Cad. Sa&uacute;de P&uacute;blica, 2001;17: 99-102.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000131&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">6. Gaviria AM.    Estudio seroepidemiol&oacute;gico y de conocimientos, actitudes y pr&aacute;cticas    sobre control y prevenci&oacute;n del dengue. Colegio Mayor de Antioquia, 1998.    Informe Quincenal Epidemiol&oacute;gica Nacional, 1999; 4(15):226-229.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000132&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">7. Farieta S. Estudio    de identificaci&oacute;n de &aacute;reas cr&iacute;ticas del dengue en funci&oacute;n    del riesgo epidemiol&oacute;gica en el municipalidad de Girardot. Madrid: Facultad    de Ciencias. Universidad de Barcelona; 2002.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000133&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">8. Espinoza F,    Hern&aacute;ndez C, Rend&oacute;n R. Transmisi&oacute;n &iacute;nterepid&eacute;mica    del dengue en la ciudad de Colima, M&eacute;xico. Salud P&uacute;blica de M&eacute;xico,    2003; 45(.5):365-370.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000134&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9. Tinker M, Olano    V. Ecolog&iacute;a del <I>Aedes aegypti</I> en un pueblo de Colombia, Sur Am&eacute;rica.    Biom&eacute;dica 1993; 13(1):5-14. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000135&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">10. Reinaldo Souza    R, S&aacute; Carvalho M. Spatial analysis of <I>Aedes aegypti</I> larval distribution    in the Ilha do Governador neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cad. Sa&uacute;de    P&uacute;blica, 2000; 16(1):31-42.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000136&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">11. Dengue y dengue    hemorr&aacute;gico en las Am&eacute;ricas: Gu&iacute;as para su prevenci&oacute;n    y control. OPS; 1995. Publicaci&oacute;n Cient&iacute;fica Nº 548: p.3-34.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000137&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">12. Camacho T,    De la Hoz F, C&aacute;rdenas V, S&aacute;nchez C, De Calder&oacute;n L, P&eacute;rez    L, et al. Vigilancia epidemiol&oacute;gica incompleta de la epidemia de Dengue-2,    en Ibagu&eacute;, Colombia. Biom&eacute;dica, 2004; 24(2):174-182.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000138&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">13. Lloyd L. Mejores    pr&aacute;cticas para la prevenci&oacute;n y el control del dengue en las Am&eacute;ricas.    USAID; February 2003.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">14. Acha P, Cipr&eacute;s    B. Zoonosis y enfermedades transmisibles comunes al hombre y a los animales.    OPS; 1997. Publicaci&oacute;n Cient&iacute;fica Nº 503; p.302-305.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">15. Guzm&aacute;n    M, Kouri G. Dengue: an update. The Lancet, 2002; 2:33-42. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000141&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">16. Biolog&iacute;a    y control del <I>Aedes aegypti</I>. Center for Disease Control. Vector topics.    1980; 4: 1-80. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">17. Benenson A.    Manual de control de las enfermedades transmisibles en el hombre. D&eacute;cimo    quinta edici&oacute;n. OPS. Publicaci&oacute;n cient&iacute;fica Nº 538; 1992.    p.82-88.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000143&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">18. Suarez M. <I>Aedes    aIbopictus</I> (Skuse) (Diptera, culicidae) en Buenaventura Colombia. Inf Qinc    Epidem Nac 2001; 6(15):222-223.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">19. Cuzzubo A,    Vaughn D, Nisalak A, Solomon T, Kalayanarooj S, Aaskov J, <I>et al</I>. Comparison    of panbio dengue duo IgM and IgG capture ELISA and venture technologies dengue    Ig M and IgG dor blot. Journal of clinical virology 2000; 16:135-144. </font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">20. Mancheno M,    Kroeger A, Alvarez G. Manual t&eacute;cnico para el control de malaria, dengue,    leishmaniosis y oncocercosis. Editorial Servi offset; 2000. p.81-98.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">21.Giraldo GP,    Cuevas H, Pab&oacute;n JD, Padilla JC. Comportamiento del dengue cl&aacute;sico    asociado con la temperatura superficial del mar como indicador del ciclo ENOS    en Colombia, 1980-1998. Informe Quincenal Epidemiol&oacute;gica Nacional, 1999;    4(21):322-327).</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000147&pid=S0124-0064200500010000100021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Received on 30    November 2004/Reviewed on 6 December 2004/Accepted 4 February 2005</font> </p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velandia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cedeño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MT]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Sistema de vigilancia sindrómica sobre enfermedades febriles transmitidas por vectores, con énfasis en fiebre amarilla, dengue y malaria en los departamentos de Guaviare, Putumayo, Caquetá y Norte de Santander]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Inf Qinc Epidem Nac]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<month>20</month>
<day>03</day>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>74-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Las jornadas departamentales, una estrategia fundamental para la prevención y control del dengue]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Boletín Epidemiológico de Cundinamarca]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>55-65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lwanga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lemeshow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Determinación del tamaño de las muestras en los estudios sanitarios]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[WHO]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Registro de altitud del Aedes aegypti en Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biomédica]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>225</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tauil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Urbanization and dengue ecology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saúde Pública]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>99-102</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaviria]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Estudio seroepidemiológico y de conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas sobre control y prevención del dengue. Colegio Mayor de Antioquia, 1998]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informe Quincenal Epidemiológica Nacional]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>15</numero>
<issue>15</issue>
<page-range>226-229</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farieta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estudio de identificación de áreas críticas del dengue en función del riesgo epidemiológica en el municipalidad de Girardot]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Barcelona]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Espinoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rendón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Transmisión ínterepidémica del dengue en la ciudad de Colima, México]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Salud Pública de México]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>365-370</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tinker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Ecología del Aedes aegypti en un pueblo de Colombia, Sur América]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biomédica]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>5-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reinaldo Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sá Carvalho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Spatial analysis of Aedes aegypti larval distribution in the Ilha do Governador neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saúde Pública]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>31-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Dengue y dengue hemorrágico en las Américas: Guías para su prevención y control]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Publicación Científica]]></source>
<year></year>
<numero>548</numero>
<issue>548</issue>
<page-range>3-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camacho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De la Hoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cárdenas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Calderón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Vigilancia epidemiológica incompleta de la epidemia de Dengue-2, en Ibagué, Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biomédica]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>174-182</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lloyd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mejores prácticas para la prevención y el control del dengue en las Américas]]></source>
<year>Febr</year>
<month>ua</month>
<day>ry</day>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[USAID]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Acha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ciprés]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Zoonosis y enfermedades transmisibles comunes al hombre y a los animales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Publicación Científica]]></source>
<year></year>
<numero>503</numero>
<issue>503</issue>
<page-range>302-305</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guzmán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kouri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Dengue: an update]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Lancet]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>33-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Center for Disease Control</collab>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Biología y control del Aedes aegypti]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Vector topics]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>1-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benenson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Manual de control de las enfermedades transmisibles en el hombre: Décimo quinta edición]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Publicación científica]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<numero>538</numero>
<issue>538</issue>
<page-range>82-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Aedes aIbopictus (Skuse) (Diptera, culicidae) en Buenaventura Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Inf Qinc Epidem Nac]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>15</numero>
<issue>15</issue>
<page-range>222-223</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuzzubo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaughn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nisalak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Solomon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kalayanarooj]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aaskov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparison of panbio dengue duo IgM and IgG capture ELISA and venture technologies dengue Ig M and IgG dor blot]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of clinical virology]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>135-144</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mancheno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kroeger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alvarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Manual técnico para el control de malaria, dengue, leishmaniosis y oncocercosis]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<page-range>81-98</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Servi offset]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giraldo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuevas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pabón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Padilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Comportamiento del dengue clásico asociado con la temperatura superficial del mar como indicador del ciclo ENOS en Colombia, 1980-1998]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informe Quincenal Epidemiológica Nacional]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>21</numero>
<issue>21</issue>
<page-range>322-327</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
