<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1657-0790</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[profile]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1657-0790</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Departamento de Lenguas Extranjeras, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1657-07902005000100014</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Tasting Teaching Flavors: A Group of Student-Teachers´ Experiences in their Practicum]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Saboreando el gusto de la enseñanza: Experiencias de un grupo de estudiantes-maestros en su práctica]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castañeda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Liliana Prada]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zuleta Garzón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Xatlí]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>6</numero>
<fpage>157</fpage>
<lpage>170</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1657-07902005000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1657-07902005000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1657-07902005000100014&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Student-teachers expect their experience in the practicum to show them what teaching truly involves. Most of them are willing to put into practice all the theories and concepts they have learned and to find out if these actually work. This article reports on a study conducted on the experiences of four primary school student-teachers. The study led to the identification of their difficulties, to looking at how they felt about those difficulties, and to how they dealt with them. Instruments for data collection were the journals and group conferences used by the practice counselor and a semi-structured interview. The study revealed that a constant reflective practice allows practitioners to deal with all the different situations they have to face, and more so, to go beyond them.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Los estudiantes-maestros esperan que la práctica docente les muestre lo que es realmente la enseñanza. La mayoría de ellos están deseosos de poner en práctica todas las teorías y conceptos aprendidos y averiguar si verdaderamente funcionan. Este artículo da cuenta de un estudio en el que se describe la experiencia de cuatro estudiantes-practicantes. El objetivo principal del estudio fue identificar las dificultades que enfrentan, examinar qué actitudes tuvieron frente a esas dificultades y cómo las superaron. Los instrumentos utilizados para la recolección de datos incluyeron diarios, charlas en grupo e individuales realizadas por el director de práctica y una entrevista semi-estructurada. El estudio reveló que una constante reflexión permite que los practicantes superen las dificultades y vayan más allá de las mismas.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Teacher preparation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[teaching practice]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[student-teachers]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[difficulties]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Formación de maestros]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[práctica docente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estudiantes-practicantes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[dificultades]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="verdana" size="2">     <p><b>    <center><font face="verdana" size="4">Tasting Teaching Flavors: A Group of Student-Teachers´ Experiences in their Practicum</font></center></b></p>     <p>&nbsp; </p>     <p><b>    <center><font face="verdana" size="3">Saboreando el gusto de la ense&ntilde;anza: Experiencias de un grupo de estudiantes-maestros en su pr&aacute;ctica</font></center></b></p>     <p>&nbsp; </p>     <p><b>Liliana Prada Casta&ntilde;eda<sup>1</sup>Xatl&iacute; Zuleta Garz&oacute;n<sup>1</sup></b>       <p><sup><b>1</b></sup>Universidad Nacional de Colombia    <br>   <a href="mailtoshakepaul@yahoo.com">shakepaul@yahoo.com</a>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br>   <a href="mailto:mi_zule@yahoo.com">mi_zule@yahoo.com</a>   </p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr size="1">     <p>Student-teachers expect their experience in the practicum to show them what    teaching truly involves. Most of them are willing to put into practice all the    theories and concepts they have learned and to find out if these actually work.    This article reports on a study conducted on the experiences of four primary    school student-teachers. The study led to the identification of their difficulties,    to looking at how they felt about those difficulties, and to how they dealt    with them. Instruments for data collection were the journals and group conferences    used by the practice counselor and a semi-structured interview. The study revealed    that a constant reflective practice allows practitioners to deal with all the    different situations they have to face, and more so, to go beyond them.</p>     <p><b>Key words</b>: Teacher preparation, teaching practice, student-teachers, difficulties</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr size="1">     <p>Los estudiantes-maestros esperan que la pr&aacute;ctica docente les muestre    lo que es realmente la ense&ntilde;anza. La mayor&iacute;a de ellos est&aacute;n    deseosos de poner en pr&aacute;ctica todas las teor&iacute;as y conceptos aprendidos    y averiguar si verdaderamente funcionan. Este art&iacute;culo da cuenta de un    estudio en el que se describe la experiencia de cuatro estudiantes-practicantes.    El objetivo principal del estudio fue identificar las dificultades que enfrentan,    examinar qu&eacute; actitudes tuvieron frente a esas dificultades y c&oacute;mo    las superaron. Los instrumentos utilizados para la recolecci&oacute;n de datos    incluyeron diarios, charlas en grupo e individuales realizadas por el director    de pr&aacute;ctica y una entrevista semi-estructurada. El estudio revel&oacute;    que una constante reflexi&oacute;n permite que los practicantes superen las    dificultades y vayan m&aacute;s all&aacute; de las mismas.</p>     <p><b>Palabras claves</b>: Formaci&oacute;n de maestros, pr&aacute;ctica docente, estudiantes-practicantes,    dificultades</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr size="1">        <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">INTRODUCTION</font></b></p>     <p>   There is a growing interest in preparing students to become effective teachers.    Therefore, some teacher preparation and teacher education programs have been    developed in order to enhance this process. The principles of some of these    programs for pre-service teachers state that "student-teachers need the    opportunity to experience how to teach concepts at first hand. They also need    the time to reflect on how new concepts affect their own thinking and principles    within their own teaching situation. In addition, they need time to put them    into practice in their own classrooms" (Vale and Feunteun, 1995).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   Bearing in mind this interest in achieving effective preparation and development    during the first teaching experience, we saw the importance of observing a specific    aspect perceived during the practicum, namely, difficulties faced and solutions    applied by student-teachers in order to overcome them. As a result of this reflection,    we decided to inquire into the experiences a group of primary school student-teachers    had during their practicum, and to describe those so that future student-teachers    could review this study, and, also, discover alternatives for dealing with their    practicum experiences. This was possible thanks to the collaboration of the    counselor who monitored the process by collecting data and sharing it with us    to fulfil our goals. It should be clarified that we got permission from the    participants to use the data their counselor had collected as well as to interview    them in order to explore certain aspects in more detail. </p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">LITERATURE REVIEW</font></b></p>     <p>   We started by making a distinction between teacher preparation and teacher education    approaches. After that, we presented the models for professional teacher education,    but we focused on the reflective model. This was due to the fact that our participants    were involved in this approach throughout their teaching practice experience.    Then, we presented the perspectives on teacher preparation and finally, the    importance of the practicum in the preparation and development of student-teachers.</p>     <p><b>Distinction between Teacher Preparation and Teacher Education</b></p>     <p>   Teacher preparation or pre-service teacher education should establish the bases    for professionals to engage in ongoing development. There is a process of preparation    towards the achievement of a range of results, which is specified in advance    (Widdowson, 1990). It means the practicum provides the opportunity to observe    some difficulties and find possible solutions which could be applied in many    other teaching settings. In other words, it is the teaching experience that    helps teachers to gain awareness of their performances, and gives them tools    to become effective managers of their classrooms. Thus, future teachers acquire    the "practical knowledge" that is defined as the knowledge that    teachers generate as a result of their experiences as teachers and their reflections    on these experiences (Fenstermacher, 1994. In Chiou-hui, 2001).</p>     <p>   On the other hand, teacher education provides for situations which cannot be    accommodated into preconceived patterns of response but which require a reformulation    of ideas and the modification of established formulae (Widdowson, 1990). So,    each teacher should make use of the preconceived patterns taking into account    his or her own situation and making the necessary changes so that those patterns    work.</p>     <p>   Nonetheless, we cannot assert that we have precise divisions between one and    another. For instance, from our experience in our teaching preparation program,    we could mention that we acquired some theory-based knowledge and some tools    we could use when we did our teaching practice. However, we found that those    tools were not enough to deal with the teaching situations observed in the practicum    because the context varied depending on students´ needs and the classroom.    Therefore, these situations required a reformulation of previous knowledge and    tools in order to identify what we had to change or improve in order to achieve    effectiveness in teaching.</p>     <p><b>Models for Professional Preparation</b></p>     <p>   Wallace (1990) describes three models of professional development, the craft    model, the applied-science model and the reflective model. In the following    paragraphs we briefly describe the first two models as the latter was the main    approach followed by the counselor in the teaching practice.</p>     <p>1. Craft Model</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   According to this model, the practitioner is supposed to learn by imitating    all the teaching techniques used by experienced teachers. The most relevant    strategies are those provided by experts, thus the student-teachers play a passive    role.</p>     <p>2. Applied Science Model</p>     <p>   In this model, student-teachers in their different situations put into practice    the findings of scientific knowledge. Changes at the practical level applied    by practitioners are not taken into account; therefore, their value is underestimated,    thereby creating a separation between research and professional practice.</p>     <p>3. Reflective Model</p>     <p>   This model consists of two kinds of knowledge development. Received knowledge,    that is related to all the theories, concepts and skills that are studied during    the student-teacher´s ELT methodology lessons, and, experiential knowledge    which is developed by the trainees throughout their teaching practice.</p>     <p>   Wallace (1990), presents the reflective model as a cyclical process <a href="#f1">(see Figure    1)</a> in which the trainees are involved throughout their teaching experience.    There is an assumption that they already have some knowledge that they acquired    as students and during the development of their English program. Once student-teachers    have the opportunity to enter the classroom environment, they discover the actual    framework of teaching and become aware of the different classroom situations.    Thus, they start thinking about their performance during the teaching practice,    how some experienced teachers deal with those situations, and also, how they    themselves could manage them. So, they make some decisions and think about possible    actions they could apply to their context. </p>         <p>    <center><a name="f1"><img src="img/revistas/prf/n6/n6a14f1.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>   We consider the craft and the applied-science models somewhat limited as they    do not foster student-teachers´ self-development or awareness of their    role not only as teachers but as teacher-researchers in their classrooms, which    is a very important issue of professional development as expressed by Camargo    (2003), who states that research in the ELT education field has become an important    aspect which has contributed to reflection and action to qualify teacher education    processes.</p>     <p>Wallace (1990) puts forward the three current models for professional preparation    in language teacher preparation. He states that all three are necessary, particularly    the reciprocity between the applied science and the reflective model. Due to    the limitations of the former, what most teachers have always felt is confirmed:    that their pre-service preparation has not fully equipped them for teaching    and that the real business of being a teacher is bound up with the classroom    (Houten, M., in McLean, A.C., 1997). In addition, Huberman (1996) says that    education at the university level provides some methodological procedures that    are supposed to deal with theory and practice, but in the real context of the    practicum, student-teachers find some difficulties related to teaching that    they have to solve by themselves.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   We agree that pre-service training should provide student-teachers with the    necessary tools to refine their abilities in order to create their own teaching    style. However, we can say from our teaching experience in the practicum that    this is not totally accomplished because we had to face different situations    we were not prepared for. We believe there is a gap between theory and practice    and we did not acquire strong theoretical knowledge that helped us to successfully    develop, deal with a particular topic or with a particular group of students    at a particular time and place (Johnson, 1996). As said by Frodden and L&oacute;pez    (1998), the disconnection between theory and practice is a consequence of the    isolated use of the applied science model which causes some difficulties for    the student-teachers when solving problems in a real professional context. </p>     <p>   Also, we can cite a study carried out in a university in Colombia concerning    student-teachers´ perceptions about their teaching experiences. In this    study, the researcher mentioned that one of the main problems that the student-teachers    had was the inability to integrate theory and practice. "They did not    find a clear way to articulate the theory they had learned at university to    the reality of their classrooms" (Camargo, 2003, p. 7).</p>     <p>   In short, the reflective model is considered the most appropriate approach because    it integrates the strengths of the other two models, and emphasizes the process    of reflection in order to improve teaching practice. It is supported by studies    conducted in our country. For instance, a study developed in order to update    the B.A. program at the Universidad Tecnol&oacute;gica del Choc&oacute; (Kalil,    2003) highlights the importance of adopting the reflective model in the curriculum    in order to avoid the gap between what is taught in the methodological component    and what is practiced in the language classroom. As a result of the study, the    university staff concluded that they should apply the reflective method to their    program and make some changes in the student-teachers´ and supervisor´s    roles such as from recipients to demanding and challenging ones. Thus, the reflective    model is considered to be a means of professional development which involves    the need to become a reflective practitioner and to develop abilities in learning    how to teach. </p>     <p><b>Perspectives in Teacher Preparation</b></p>     <p>   The main purpose of teacher preparation is to prepare students to become effective    language teachers. Richards and Nunan (1990) propose general principles that    account for effective teaching, the variables that can appear in language teaching    and how they are interrelated. They mention that it is important to study the    teaching process achieved by the micro and macro approaches. The former defines    the effective teacher as one who commands a set of intellectual abilities that    contribute to improving the teaching practice. It also examines the teacher´s    characteristics such as interests, attitudes, judgment, self-control, enthusiasm,    adaptability, personality, and how these factors influence learning outcomes.    The macro approach is the examination of the total context of classroom teaching    and learning in an attempt to understand how the interactions among the teacher,    learners and classroom tasks affect learning. </p>     <p>   In short, the aim of these approaches is to provide opportunities for student-teachers    to acquire skills and competencies for effective teaching as well as to discover    by themselves how experienced teachers manage their classes.</p>     <p>   On the other hand, Vale and Feunteun (1995) share Wallace´s point of view    about teacher preparation and the importance of reflecting. They agree that    student-teachers need the opportunity to experience how to teach concepts first    hand and that they also require time to reflect on how new concepts affect their    own thinking and principles within their own teaching situations. In addition,    student-teachers need time to put those concepts into practice in their own    classrooms, and it is strongly recommended that they regularly set aside time    for the purposes of reflection and assessment, in particular for teachers to    consider how the course content may affect their own teaching.</p>     <p><b>The Practicum</b></p>     <p>   The importance of the practicum in the practitioners´ development as future    teachers is recognized by teacher educators, who add every day to what has already    been said about this, and propose new approaches to preparation programs as    well as to the teaching practice itself.</p>     <p>   Wallace (1990) states that the practicum gives student-teachers the chance to    apply knowledge and skills gained elsewhere or to develop strategies for handling    the different dimensions of the language lesson. Practitioners are expected    to develop a critical view of the teaching situation and to implement their    previous knowledge in order to create new strategies for becoming effective    teachers.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   In this teaching practice, student-teachers face and respond to difficult situations    (Woodward, 1992), but they have many possible actions, reactions and strategies    to choose from. Therefore, it is necessary to place first-time teachers in situations    where they can listen to students, find out about them as human beings, find    out their level, and get used to being with them in a classroom and come out    unscathed. Thus, the practicum would become a relevant teaching experience in    which students apply their received knowledge and learn by themselves how to    handle daily situations in the classroom.</p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">RESEARCH QUESTIONS</font></b></p>     <p>   We intended to inquire into the experiences a group of primary school student-teachers    had during their practicum. Therefore, our main question was: How do primary    school student-teachers react to difficulties they face during their practicum?    And our sub-questions were: What are the most frequent difficulties primary    school student-teachers find in the teaching practice? What are their attitudes    towards difficulties? and What kind of strategies do they use to overcome difficulties    in the practicum?</p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">RESEARCH DESIGN</font></b></p>     <p>   A case study describes what happens in a specific context with a specific group    of individuals (Wallace, 1998). This research method gave us the opportunity    to have a very detailed contextual analysis of the events (Yin, 1984) that took    place during the practicum and the professional processes in which student-teachers    got involved throughout it. In addition, we believe that the results of our    study could be a reference for future practitioners, to help them to clarify    some doubts related to the teaching practice.</p>     <p><b>Context</b></p>     <p>   In the B. Ed. in philology and languages English program at the Universidad    Nacional de Colombia, students are required to do their teaching practice in    the 7th or 8th semester after having studied some theoretical components of    the program. The students must have taken and passed the following: Teaching    Principles (Fundamentos de la Educaci&oacute;n), Psychology and Language, the    sixth level of the Basic English Courses, and ELT Methodology I and II (Guidelines    for the teaching practice, 2003).</p>     <p>   The practicum is considered one of the basic components of the academic curriculum    whose </p> main goal is to enhance teaching-research. It takes place over a period of six  months (one semester), in which the practitioners´ role is to design the  syllabus and the different lesson plans which will be taught during the classes.  It can be developed in primary, high-school, university classes (electives) or  courses for university employees under the supervision of a counselor in charge  of guiding, assessing and evaluating the student-teachers and helping them during  the entire process.     <p><b>Participants´ Profile</b></p>     <p>   Our project was focused on four primary school student-teachers whose teaching    practice was developed at the IPARM (Instituto Pedag&oacute;gico Arturo Ram&iacute;rez    Mont&uacute;far). The participants did their practicum in 4th and 5th grades.    They were students in 8th semester majoring in English. They were four females    between the ages of 20-23 years old. Three of the student-teachers had not taught    before. The counselor in charge of the practicum was a teacher of the English    program at the university. He implemented the reflective method and developed    some specific tools to promote student-teachers´ self-assessment and reflection.    These instruments were journals, class observation sheets and one-on-one/group    conferences. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Data Gathering Procedures</b></p>     <p>   &#8226; Student-teachers and practice counselor´s journals:</p>     <p>   These were "a written exercise in which teaching practitioners describe    their routine and conscious actions in the classroom for later reflection"    (Richards &amp; Lockhart, 1994).</p>     <p>   &#8226; Student-teachers and practice counselor´s conferences:</p>     <p>   According to the practice counselor´s reflective approach, the conferences    were key tools that helped student-teachers to develop themselves as teachers    and be critical about their teaching performance. These conferences were audio-recorded    by the practice counselor and took place in group and individual sessions which    were held once a week throughout the teaching practice.</p>     <p>   &#8226; Student-teachers and practice counselor´s audio-recorded semi-structured    interviews:</p>     <p>   Our interview was designed in order to validate the information we had examined    through the journals and conferences. We decided to use individual interviews    in order to create a confidential atmosphere for the participants to express    their feelings about the practicum and the whole process during that experience.</p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">DATA ANALYSIS</font></b></p>     <p>   The first stage of our data analysis was carried out individually. This procedure    is called teaming (Stake, 2000) and its main goal is to compare different perceptions    regarding a particular aspect in order to validate and enrich its analysis.    We considered teaming and multiple methods of data collection and analysis to    accomplish triangulation, the process of using multiple perceptions, so it helped    us to clarify meaning by identifying the different ways in which the phenomenon    was observed by each one of us (Stake, 2000). In addition, we understand triangulation    strengthens reliability as well as internal validity (as said by Merriam, 1988).</p>     <p>   We carried out the process of triangulation in the following way: First, we    gathered the information from the student-teachers´ journals, then compared    it with the recorded conferences. We compared our findings after an individual    analysis of the data, and finally, we related these previous findings to the    information gathered from the interviews.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Categories and Sub-Categories</b></p>     <p>   The process of categorization was followed by a constant revision and re-organization    of the categories, but after that work, we classified the findings <a href="#f2">(see Figure    2)</a>. </p>           <p>    <center><a name="f2"><img src="img/revistas/prf/n6/n6a14f2.gif"></a></center></p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">TASTING TEACHING FLAVORS</font></b></p>     <p>   We consider this to be similar to the experience of tasting different types    of food, you like some, but you might not like some others; it is part of life    and you learn from it. Student-teachers lived in a new world, the classroom,    and learnt how to deal with all the new situations they had to confront in it.    In our study, through examining the frequency of our data, we found situations    that were "new flavors" for the student-teachers. These were related    to language use, how to organize children in the classroom, materials choice    and organization, management of mixed ability groups, how to give instructions,    and topic introduction; aspects belonging to classroom management, what is considered    to be the effective way in which the student-teachers develop their classes    in order to ensure that children work and learn in a comfortable and productive    environment. </p>     <p>   Regarding these classroom management issues, we found samples like the following:    Firstly, "I changed the organization of the class, but it didn´t    work." (Andrea, J, p. 7, line 11) shows a concern about seating arrangement,    as it either facilitated or hindered the learning process; to some extent the    development of the class depended on it. According to Gower and Walters (1983),    the organization of students in the classroom might determine their attitude    toward each other and toward the teacher, the teacher´s attitude toward    them, how students interact and the types of activities they can complete. "...half    of my class was o.k. and the other was a disaster. First, I asked children to    arrange desks in a U shape. With this organization children can see everybody´s    faces and I avoid the children´s talking too much or giggling or just    bothering all around the room" (Camila, J, p. 4, line 1).</p>     <p>   Sometimes student-teachers complained about their own materials design or when    the children forget to bring their materials to complete certain activities.    A student-teacher said: "The material was wrong, they could not see anything    from the back of the room" (Camila, J, p. 2, line 20). We called this    stuff planning, which we defined as the importance of working with the necessary    and appropriate materials. Also, student-teachers experienced difficulties when    managing different kinds of activities and appropriating time in order to get    good results during the lessons. As a matter of fact, the student-teachers noted    that careless materials planning and organization affected the development of    their lessons. "The main problem here is that I only have one copy per    group, and it makes the work with some students difficult" (Andrea, J,    p. 3, line 20); "I had a terrible problem with some activities because    I did not bring enough copies for all the children" (Sandra, J, p. 1,    line 3). The previous samples evidence how materials selected by the student-teacher,    their design, shape and size could help to develop a good lesson or to cause    disruption and suddenly cause the children to lose interest.</p>     <p>   Our participants were concerned about the way they could handle the lessons    when there were students with different abilities: "My class was not good    today, kids are very active and heterogeneous" (Camila, J, p. 2, line    2). They wondered about possible ways to facilitate dealing with mixed levels    and being able to help those students who seemed to work at a different pace    or level than the majority of the children in the course. "Some kids finished    quickly and I had to give them an extra activity. Others took a lot of time    to finish, so I had to collect the papers" (Andrea, J, p. 15, line 6).</p>     <p>    Handling mixed-levels represented a challenge for the student-teachers. However,    it led them to maximize class participation, try to increase the children´s    confidence, and help in their learning process.   Even though the student-teachers tried to make their words and expressions full    of meaning but uncomplicated in order to establish effective communication in    the lessons, the kids sometimes did not understand or did the opposite. "I    asked them to bring clocks and make the cards there, problems came...they didn´t    understand what they had to do. I had to explain again and again. (Camila, J,    p. 2, line 12) and "I noticed they even didn´t know what to do and    when I tried to explain, they didn´t understand me" (Sandra, J,    p. 18, line 8).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   These two samples show the relevant aspects that classroom management theory    states about giving instructions. The teacher´s instructions must be precise    and clear in order to avoid wasting time and uncertainty (Gower and Walters,    1983). Actually, one sample from our data confirmed this tenet. "...I    was thinking about yesterday in that meeting but I can´t complain about    my kids because they´re noisy. It´s because I don´t give instructions    at the right time..." (Camila, Conf-01: p. 3, line 132).</p>     <p>   Introducing topics became another difficulty the student-teachers had to face.    "Introducing a topic is very difficult for me" (Camila, J, p. 12,    line 10). Some of the student-teachers believed that they should work hard on    this in order to capture the students´ attention from the beginning of    the lesson. "I tried to explain some habits but some of them did not pay    attention" (Andrea, J, p. 19, line 2). They also mentioned that it was    very important to introduce the different topics in a very creative way. Children    like colorful things and visual aids that help them to understand what is going    on in the class and what the teacher wants them to do. "I brought different    visual aids in order to make the topic more comprehensible" (Sandra, J,    p. 12, line 1). </p>     <p>   Misbehavior commonly took place in the classroom when the students were not    really engaged in the learning activity or when they did not understand the    tasks they had been assigned, as we interpreted from our data. Student-teachers    faced difficult situations which caused a lack of discipline and did not allow    them to achieve the goals set for each class. This was one of their main concerns.  </p>     <p>   On the other hand, according to our findings, code-using dilemma was another    student-teachers´ concern. It referred to the use of the second language    during the lessons. The participants expressed the necessity to use the mother    tongue most of the time in order to avoid misunderstanding and make students    feel at ease. "I used the mother tongue in order to avoid misunderstanding,    to diminish students´ affective filter and to feel closer to them"    (Alejandra, J, p. 1, line 7). Moreover, other examples arose regarding using    Spanish and English during the lessons. "I have problems about talking    in Spanish and English. That constant code switching makes me mad...."    (Camila, J, p. 3, line 13) and "In this class, I spoke in English, but    I used Spanish many times" (Andrea, J, p. 1, line 4).</p>     <p>   Then, we concentrated on our second question: What are the student-teachers´    attitudes towards difficulties? So, we gave the name swinging into action to    this category in order to explain how they reviewed and evaluated their performance    as teachers when they had to react to and cope with difficulties. We found in    the data that the student-teachers were in a constant process of reflection    that made them question their actions regarding solving problems. "...Entonces    era un pensar todo el tiempo en qu&eacute; se iba a hacer, en c&oacute;mo lo    iba a hacer, en qu&eacute; les llevo y tengo que prepararles esta actividad"    (I constantly thought about what to do in class, how to do it, what to take    to the class, and also that I had to plan an activity for the student) (Camila,    Int.: p. 5, line 145). This process was led by the practice counselor with the    different tools he applied. "I used to ask them things like, ah, what    would you say for your case? Learn about this or what you have seen is important    in this experience, so they come to conclusions; for instance, what might be    implied by, what they have learnt, or what they were learning. So, all of this    is... is a cycle that I tried to prepare in terms of the students´ reflection"    (Juan, Int.: p. 2, line 18). </p>     <p>   We could see that this process helped them to improve their teaching by themselves    and also helped them to be constantly thinking about what should be done to    cope with difficulties. In other words, the student-teachers had the opportunity    to think deeply about their performance and learn from their own practice how    to deal with the new environment they were facing. "Siempre nosotros los    estudiantes estamos acostumbrados a que el profesor nos diga qu&eacute; debemos    hacer, y en este caso nadie me dijo que deb&iacute;a hacer, mi asesor fue una    gu&iacute;a, fue muy importante, pero &eacute;l nunca me impuso nada, yo misma    tuve que dise&ntilde;ar y tuve como que entender en qu&eacute; estaba fallando,    entonces para m&iacute; fue muy interesante porque me di cuenta que siempre    voy a tener la respuesta soy yo, pues obviamente uno se tiene que basar en muchas    teor&iacute;as y pedir ciertos consejos, pero b&aacute;sicamente uno mismo puede    controlar y puede buscar una soluci&oacute;n a esos problemas que se van a encontrar    en el aula de clase" (We, students, are used to having the teacher tell    us what to do, but in this case, nobody said it. The counselor was a guide.    He played a very important role, but he never imposed anything on us. I had    to plan, and I also had to identify by myself what I was doing wrong. Thus,    this experience was very interesting for me. I realized that I would always    have the answer, based on theory and following some advice obviously, but mainly    it is oneself who can take control and can deal with difficulties found in the    classroom.) (Andrea, Int.: p.4, line 99). Wallace´s reflective cycle (1990)    shows this progressive learning as a method student-teachers should apply while    carrying out their teaching practice.</p>     <p>   Throughout the data analysis, we noticed that student-teachers´ attitudes    towards difficulties evolved during their teaching experience. They reflected    upon their difficult teaching situations, they set objectives in order to deal    with those situations, and finally, after the implementation of some strategies,    they reflected once more upon the results. </p>     <p>1. Reflecting upon experiences and knowledge</p>     <p>   Bearing in mind that the English program at Universidad Nacional states that    students-teachers must complete some academic requirements before doing the    teaching practice, we can say that, to a certain extent, this previous theoretical    knowledge helped them to deal with problems in the practicum.</p>     <p>   The student-teachers tried to define the way they were conducting the lessons    by means of constant and deep reflection, and they felt confident enough to    express their feelings, and to try to find solutions based on their experiences    and knowledge. "I think that the last two classes I haven´t conclude    the topic. I think were very superficial, maybe the parts of the house and this    part of my clothes, I think they were very superficial so I need to improve    on that this class because sometimes, we have to... o.k. for example, you want    to teach something new every class, so I think that sometimes is not good,...    it could be a mistake to continue without checking some aspects, some important    aspects" (Andrea 02, Conf.: p. 4, line 205). Once more, we conclude that    the reflection process helped student-teachers to appropriately respond to the    difficulties related to their actual teaching context and gave them the necessary    tools to become very analytical and critical teachers as well. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>2. Setting goals for immediate action</p>     <p>   The student-teachers realized the importance of establishing goals and finding    solutions in order to manage problems which emerged in their classrooms. "...There´s    one thing that worries me, they are becoming reluctant to the teacher speaking    in English, so I think, I will have to monitor them in English" (Camila,    J, p. 10, line 13). They established specific goals to overcome the weaknesses    and difficulties they identified in their teaching practice. "&#8230;Next    class I´m going to use a U-shape, because I finally noticed that the old    group desk arrangement doesn´t work during individual activities, but    the U-shape does" (Sandra, J, p. 9, line 9).</p>     <p>   After observing and reflecting on the problems that arose, the student-teachers    evaluated their work as teachers and noticed what was going wrong in their classrooms    and looked for certain strategies to cope with problems. "...Obviously    I have to improve in many aspects; for example, how to catch their attention    without screaming, how to organize the class, the organization of topics and    the development of those aspects&#8230;" (Andrea, J, p. 3, line 18). </p>     <p>3. Feeling relieved after taking action</p>     <p>   Overcoming difficulties was a transition similar to a pendulous movement. Student-teachers    reflected, set goals and examined if their actions had been successful. We can    illustrate this with the next excerpt: "...They find the rewarding moments    because what they plan worked, because students have set certain attitudes,    that reveal that they are learning, ah!, because they feel that they have done    a lot to help students..." (Practice Counselor, Int, p. 3, line 23).</p>     <p>   After dealing with the process of overcoming difficulties, the participants    felt relieved. It was difficult for some of them, but that could be associated    with the personal construct theory that says: "There is often a difference    between espoused theory (theory claimed by a participant) and theory in action    (what a participant actually does in the classroom)" (Donaghue, 2003).    One of our participants commented that she felt discouraged when she noticed    that her strategies had not worked as expected "...ah, really disappointed...    because I imagined I had done a... better job, no...I imagined I had done better,    but when I saw the video I felt that I hadn´t done my best yet, I felt    like... Oh, my God... I felt frustrated" (Sandra, Conf-01, p. 01, line    38). </p>     <p>   However, we consider it of the utmost importance to mention that the student-teachers´    attitudes evolved during their teaching practice and that evolution caused them    to feel more comfortable and secure with their role as teachers, as shown in    this excerpt: "...he aprendido a organizar, igual preparando clases, yo    me acuerdo que era todo un d&iacute;a y por ah&iacute; escrib&iacute; que era    frustrante, saber que duraba horas y horas y buscaba informaci&oacute;n y al    final o no la usaba o no era relevante en ese instante,&#8230;ahorita no"    (I have learned to organize. Preparing classes, I remember that I spent all    day long, and I wrote that it was frustrating to know that I used to spend hours    and hours, and I looked for information, but at the end I did not use it or    it was not relevant at that moment, ... Now, it´s different) (Alejandra,    Conf.01, p. 9, line 408).</p>     <p>   We consider that future teachers in their first teaching experience are similar    to a caterpillar that has been in a chrysalis for a long time. It grows and    changes. Suddenly, it emerges to contemplate the world and tries to survive    by implementing different strategies. The student-teachers had theoretical backgrounds,    but once they faced the teaching experience, they found a new world waiting    for them to experiment and apply what they had learnt previously. Furthermore,    they created new strategies for overcoming difficult or unknown situations in    their classrooms. </p>     <p>   Therefore, we called our third category leaving the chrysalis; a category made    up of three sub-categories which helped us identify the kind of strategies student-teachers    used to overcome difficulties. </p>     <p>1. Going through literature</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   We noted the tendency of student-teachers to turn to research published on topics    related to the class difficulties that they had. "&#8230;I read about    Cooperative Learning and I was very interested in &#8230;try to enhance students    to cooperate among themselves and to work not for the purpose of grading but    just for learning" (Alejandra 02, Conf-01, p. 4, line 210).</p>     <p>   According to their factual teaching context, they adapted some theory-based    methods and strategies. Then, they applied them in their classrooms in order    to observe and analyse if they really worked or not. "&#8230;Luego lo    aplicaba otra vez, ya como m&aacute;s adapt&aacute;ndolo, y luego tra&iacute;a    cosas que hab&iacute;a le&iacute;do, entonces era una b&uacute;squeda constante    de c&oacute;mo hacer las cosas, &#8230;y me la pasaba leyendo. Ah&iacute; estuve    en una b&uacute;squeda bibliogr&aacute;fica extensiva en eso" (...Then,    I implemented it once more trying to adjust it, and I brought some information    I had read. So, it was a constant search for understanding how to carry out    the class, ...and I used to read a lot. It was an exhaustive literature review.)    (Camila, Int. p. 6, line 173).</p>     <p>   We could conclude that their wish to learn and to implement strategies that    could help them is like the story of "The Very Hungry Caterpillar".    They looked for more and more useful literature; sometimes they followed it,    other times they adapted it to suit their needs in order to overcome their teaching    problems.</p>     <p>2. Getting experts´ advice</p>     <p>   The student-teachers expected that experienced people like teacher educators,    peers, and homeroom teachers would provide them with some strategies and solutions    to be applied in their classrooms and specific situations like the following:    "...I´m trying to improve this by asking friends who have already    taught kids, recycling a lot about classroom management". (Camila, J,    p. 3, line 9) and "...They ended up talking about their personal circumstances,    a couple of pieces of advice" (Juan, J, p. 8, line 27). </p>     <p>   Additionally, the involvement of the student-teachers in reflective sessions    with the practice counselor helped them to get acquainted with some knowledge    that they could possibly apply in their lessons. This process was carried out    implicitly, by means of their practice counselor´s assessment when dealing    with classroom management. "Siempre nosotros los estudiantes estamos acostumbrados    a que el profesor nos diga qu&eacute; debemos hacer, y en este caso nadie me    dijo que deb&iacute;a hacer, mi asesor fue una gu&iacute;a, fue muy importante,    pero &eacute;l nunca me impuso nada, yo misma tuve que dise&ntilde;ar y tuve    como que entender en qu&eacute; estaba fallando..." (Andrea, Int.: p.    4, line 99).</p>     <p>3. Creating and experimenting with solutions</p>     <p>   From any sources they could consult such as colleagues, teacher educators and    theory from books, the student-teachers chose solutions they thought would work    best in each of their contexts. Sources became important tools for received    knowledge. This fostered in the student-teachers an interest in sharing concerns    with peers and experienced teachers in order to find some solutions already    tested in similar contexts. "...Igual frente a situaciones adversas y    superar esas situaciones, aprendes much&iacute;simo, y que igual el superarlas    te demanda crear estrategias..." (Likewise, when you face difficult situations    and then overcome them, you learn a lot, but also, overcoming those situations    forces you to create strategies...) (Alejandra, Int: p. 14, line 431). </p>     <p>   Based on their received knowledge and their experiential knowledge, the student-teachers    created strategies. After experimenting with some of them, and redesigning them,    the main strategies we identified through our data analysis were the implementation    of discipline codes by using color cards, the use of cooperative learning, counting,    writing names on the board, and a competitive game.  </p>     <p>"...Actually the only strategy that I used was to count and it worked    at the beginning, but maybe at the end, it didn´t work anymore, and I´ve    tried to do it now, but it is not the same like at the beginning" (Sandra    Conf-01, p. 5, line 191).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   "...A veces quedaban perdidos, hac&iacute;an lo contrario, entonces tuve    que hacer eh!, muchas ayudas visuales, de pronto repetici&oacute;n eh!, escribir    en el tablero, pero tocaba hacer de todo para que entendieran" (Sometimes,    the students got lost. They did the exercise the other way around, then I had    to make... many visual aids, to repeat, write on the board, but I had to do    different things to make them understand.) (Sandra Int, p. 2, line 23). "In    this class I introduced a new system of rules related to discipline. I chose    three words &#8216;silence´, &#8216;warning´ and &#8216;game over´.    The first one had the purpose of achieving students´ silence. &#8216;Warning´    is like an "aviso", if they continue talking I showed them &#8216;game    over´. The group loses the point related to discipline. I´m also    going to give them an extra point if they are quiet in the class" (Andrea,    J, p. 24, line 1).</p>     <p>   "...Tuve que inventarme un sistema de tarjetas con los ni&ntilde;os, de    puntos y de certificados al final, de tal modo que los ni&ntilde;os estuvieran    motivados y haciendo lo que estaban haciendo para que yo pudiera llevar un proceso    pedag&oacute;gico de las actividades" (I had to make up a card system    for the kids, using points and certificates at the end, for them to be motivated    and work so I could accomplish a pedagogical process through the activities.)    (Camila, Int, p. 6, line 191). </p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">CONCLUSIONS</font></b></p>     <p>   The findings revealed that at the beginning of the practicum the student-teachers    had plenty of expectations about the teaching experience and their reactions    included anxiety, doubt and stress. However, when they observed a difficulty    they took into account what they thought would suit the situations. Also, they    tried to search for solutions from different sources. Nonetheless, as they faced    this experience, their feelings changed. It was hard at the beginning, but at    the end, they were very happy with their results. </p>     <p>   Moreover, we found that the reflective approach chosen by the practice counselor    helped student-teachers to critically and analytically assess their practice.    This approach provided some tools which allowed student-teachers to take a look    at their process and become aware of their strengths and weaknesses, so they    established objectives in order to change or improve their teaching. It also    encouraged them to create their own strategies and search for solutions by themselves    in order to overcome classroom difficulties. And not only difficulties as we    had thought, but they also created strategies in order to improve their teaching    practice and provide children with a better and more productive environment.  </p>     <p>   We can also conclude that the most frequent difficulties were mainly related    to classroom management. It is therefore evident that most of these difficulties    were related to an effective way to control how the lessons were carried out.    This is, in turn, related to the macro approach to teacher education (Richards    &amp; Nunan, 1990) because this model for professional preparation seeks to    develop effective teachers by means of applying dimensions (classroom management,    structuring, tasks and grouping) in an effective way. </p>     <p>   Regarding student-teachers´ strategies to overcome problematic situations,    we can mention some discipline codes applied through games, symbolic cards and    the use of cooperative learning. The use of strategies showed their interest    in overcoming situations that were not so easy and their creativity to combine    elements from theory, colleagues´ advice, and input provided by the practice    counselor and peers´ reflections made during the conferences. Most of    the student-teachers created some strategies not only to get the children to    be silent, but to start developing values and reflective attitudes among the    children. </p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">IMPLICATIONS </font></b></p>     <p>   We found that one of the reasons student-teachers faced these problems was that    the teacher education program failed to provide them with a realistic view of    teaching that adequately prepared them to cope with the realities of the classroom.    We think that a seminar or another subject should be included in the B. Ed.    English program. Besides, more attention should be given to classroom management    in order to make student-teachers conscious of the classroom environment, to    familiarize them with real context and to examine implications of possible courses    of action.</p>     <p>   Furthermore, an earlier implementation of the research component should be obligatory    in our English program. Classroom research would give student-teachers some    tools to become autonomous and to raise their awareness. Thus, the B. Ed students    from the beginning of the program could learn how to deal with different situations    which arise in the classroom.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">FURTHER RESEARCH</font></b></p>     <p>   Based on our findings, we consider that it would be invaluable to all involved    to carry out future research on how the method applied by a practice counselor    influences the students-teachers´ decisions and attempts to cope with    difficult situations throughout the practicum. Along the same line, we could    further study how that approach could develop teaching skills and professional    competence in student-teachers.</p>     <p>   In addition, we find it very interesting to study the impact of the student-teachers´    roles in their practicum. Finally, we highlight the relevance of being aware    of the student-teachers´ transition throughout the teaching practice as    well as their beliefs vis-a-vis that experience in order to become effective    teachers.</p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">THE AUTHORS</font></b></p>     <p>   <b>Liliana Prada Casta&ntilde;eda, B</b>. Ed in philology and languages, English,    from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, is currently an English teacher in    the Extension Programs at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and also at    John Dewey School. In addition, she was research assistant for the project "Investigaciones    Pedag&oacute;gicas en la Carrera de Filolog&iacute;a e Idiomas- &Aacute;rea    de Pr&aacute;cticas Docentes".</p>     <p>   <b>Xatl&iacute; Zuleta Garz&oacute;n</b> holds a B. Ed in philology and languages,    English, from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. She is an English teacher    at Rosario de Santo Domingo School. Also, she is currently a tutor for the PROFILE    in-service programs. In addition, she is a member, as a research assistant,    of the research group "PROFILE", officially recognized by Colciencias,    Universidad Nacional de Colombia.</p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">REFERENCES</font></b></p>     <!-- ref --><p>   Camargo, C.A. (2003). Voices of student-teachers about their experiences in    learning to teach. Master´s thesis, Universidad Distrital Fancisco Jos&eacute;    de Caldas, Bogot&aacute;, Colombia.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000130&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Fenstermacher (1994). In Chiou-hui, J. (2001). Exploring English teachers´    beliefs and practical knowledge about communicative language teaching in EFL    contexts. Retrieved October 14th, 2004, from <a href="http://www.hiceducation.org/Edu_Proceedings/Joyce%20Chiou-hui%20Chou.pdf" target="blank">http://www.hiceducation.org/Edu_Proceedings/Joyce%20Chiou-hui%20Chou.pdf</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000131&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Donaghue, H. (2003). An instrument to elicit teachers´ beliefs and assumptions.    Retrieved October 14th, 2004, from <a href="http://www3.oup.co.uk/eltj/hdb/Volume_57/Issue_04/pdf/570344.pdf" target="blank">http://www3.oup.co.uk/eltj/hdb/Volume_57/Issue_04/pdf/570344.pdf</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000132&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Frodden, C. and L&oacute;pez, A. (1998) University schools collaboration through    the teaching practicum. &Iacute;kala 3 (6), 47-68.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000133&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Gower, R., Phillips, D., and Walters, S. (1983). Teaching practice handbook.    Great Britain: Heinemann.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000134&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Houten, M. (1997). Teacher development. Reflective practice-starting the cycle.    In A.C., McLean, SIG Selections. Special Interests in ELT (pp.97). Kingsdown,    UK: IATEFL.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000135&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Huberman, S. (1996). &iquest;C&oacute;mo aprenden los que ense&ntilde;an?. Buenos    Aires: Aique.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000136&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Johnson, K.E (1996). The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly,    30 (4), 765-772.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000137&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Kalil, M. (2003). Criterios para una propuesta reflexiva en la pr&aacute;ctica    docente. Universidad Pedag&oacute;gica Nacional, Bogot&aacute;, Colombia.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000138&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Lineamientos generales para la pr&aacute;ctica docente. (2003). Resoluci&oacute;n    del CSU &#8211;Consejo Superior Universitario. "Por la cual se reglamentan    las pr&aacute;cticas docentes para la carrera de Filolog&iacute;a e Idiomas".    Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogot&aacute;.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.    San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Richards, J. and Nunan, D. (1990). Second language teacher education. Cambridge:    Cambridge University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000141&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Richards, J.C., and Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language    classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Stake, R.E. (2000). Case studies. Handbook of qualitative research. Thoushand    Daks-London. New Delhi: Sage.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000143&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Vale, D., and Feunteun, A. (1995). Teaching children English. A training course    for teaching of English to children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p> Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge    University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Wallace, M.J. (1990).Training foreign language teachers.A reflective approach.    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Widdowson, H.G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University    Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000147&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Woodward, T. (1992). Ways of training. Singapore: Longman.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000148&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Yin, R.K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, California:    Sage.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000149&pid=S1657-0790200500010001400020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camargo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Voices of student-teachers about their experiences in learning to teach]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Distrital Fancisco José de Caldas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fenstermacher]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chiou-hui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Exploring English teachers´ beliefs and practical knowledge about communicative language teaching in EFL contexts]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<month>20</month>
<day>01</day>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Donaghue]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[An instrument to elicit teachers´ beliefs and assumptions]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frodden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[University schools collaboration through the teaching practicum]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Íkala]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>47-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gower]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Phillips]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walters]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teaching practice handbook]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Heinemann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Houten]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Teacher development: Reflective practice-starting the cycle]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McLean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>SIG Selections</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Special Interests in ELT]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>97</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Kingsdown^eUK UK]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[IATEFL]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huberman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[¿Cómo aprenden los que enseñan?]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Aique]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The role of theory in L2 teacher education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[TESOL Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>765-772</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kalil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Criterios para una propuesta reflexiva en la práctica docente]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Pedagógica Nacional]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Lineamientos generales para la práctica docente]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotá]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merriam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Case study research in education: A qualitative approach]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Francisco ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Jossey-Bass]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nunan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Second language teacher education]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lockhart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reflective teaching in second language classrooms]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stake]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Case studies: Handbook of qualitative research]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[LondonNew Delhi ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Thoushand DaksSage]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feunteun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teaching children English: A training course for teaching of English to children]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wallace]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Action research for language teachers]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wallace]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Widdowson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aspects of language teaching]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Woodward]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ways of training]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Singapore ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Longman]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Case study research: Design and methods]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Newbury Park ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sage]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
