<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1657-0790</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development.]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[profile]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1657-0790</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Departamento de Lenguas Extranjeras, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1657-07902005000100016</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Mediated Learning Experience and the Mediator&#8217;s Implications]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La experiencia de aprendizaje mediado y las implicaciones del mediador]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres Vigoya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fanny Stella]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Gimnasio Los Andes and Universidad Nacional de Colombia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>6</numero>
<fpage>177</fpage>
<lpage>186</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1657-07902005000100016&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1657-07902005000100016&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1657-07902005000100016&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[It is clear that educators can affect learning positively or negatively, that a personal or professional attitude will immediately change the awareness pupils have toward our classes. Furthermore, as educators, we can not encourage in our pupils the development of good cognitive and socioemotional strategies if we do not constitute ourselves as a model to be followed. On account of these considerations, this article focuses on what Feuerstein (1986) has termed &#8220;mediation&#8221;, its conditions and the mediator&#8217;s profile. Thus, as language teachers, we have to think about the way we could improve and enrich the experience we are offering our pupils in order to make them feel and be intelligent cognitively and emotionally.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Es claro que como educadores podemos afectar el aprendizaje de manera positiva o negativa y que una actitud personal o profesional podría cambiar de manera inmediata la disposición que tienen nuestros estudiantes hacia nuestra clase. Además, como educadores no podemos promover en nuestros educandos el desarrollo de estrategias cognitivas y socio-emocionales positivas si nosotros mismos no nos constituimos en un modelo digno de ser seguido. Teniendo en cuenta estas consideraciones, este artículo se enfoca en lo que Feuerstein (1986) llama &#8220;mediación&#8221;, sus condiciones y el perfil del mediador. Como profesores de idiomas debemos reflexionar acerca de las maneras como podríamos mejorar y enriquecer la experiencia que le estamos ofreciendo a nuestros estudiantes para que ellos se sientan y se hagan inteligentes tanto cognitiva como emocionalmente.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Mediation, mediator]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[cognitive development]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[socioemotional development]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[intention]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[reciprocity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[transcendence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[meaning]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[competence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[complexity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[shared conduct]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[individuality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[psychological difference]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[belonging]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[awareness]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Mediación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[mediador]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[desarrollo cognitivo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[desarrollo socio-emocional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[intencionalidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reciprocidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[trascendencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[significado]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[competencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[complejidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[conducta compartida]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[individualidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[diferencia psicológica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pertenencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[disposición]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font face="verdana" size="2">     <p><b>    <center><font face="verdana" size="4">The Mediated Learning Experience and the Mediator&#8217;s Implications</font></center></b></p>     <p>&nbsp; </p>     <p><b>    <center><font face="verdana" size="3">La experiencia de aprendizaje mediado y las implicaciones del mediador</font></center></b></p>     <p>&nbsp; </p>     <p><b>Fanny Stella Torres Vigoya</b></p>       <p><a href="mailto:fanito80@yahoo.com">fanito80@yahoo.com</a>    <br>   Gimnasio Los Andes and Universidad Nacional de Colombia</p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr size="1">     <p>It is clear that educators can affect learning positively or negatively, that    a personal or professional attitude will immediately change the awareness pupils    have toward our classes. Furthermore, as educators, we can not encourage in    our pupils the development of good cognitive and socioemotional strategies if    we do not constitute ourselves as a model to be followed. On account of these    considerations, this article focuses on what Feuerstein (1986) has termed &#8220;mediation&#8221;,    its conditions and the mediator&#8217;s profile. Thus, as language teachers,    we have to think about the way we could improve and enrich the experience we    are offering our pupils in order to make them feel and be intelligent cognitively    and emotionally.</p>     <p><b>Key words</b>: Mediation, mediator, cognitive development, socioemotional development,    intention, reciprocity, transcendence, meaning, competence, complexity, shared    conduct, individuality, psychological difference, belonging, awareness</p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr size="1">     <p>Es claro que como educadores podemos afectar el aprendizaje de manera positiva    o negativa y que una actitud personal o profesional podr&iacute;a cambiar de    manera inmediata la disposici&oacute;n que tienen nuestros estudiantes hacia    nuestra clase. Adem&aacute;s, como educadores no podemos promover en nuestros    educandos el desarrollo de estrategias cognitivas y socio-emocionales positivas    si nosotros mismos no nos constituimos en un modelo digno de ser seguido. Teniendo    en cuenta estas consideraciones, este art&iacute;culo se enfoca en lo que Feuerstein    (1986) llama &#8220;mediaci&oacute;n&#8221;, sus condiciones y el perfil del    mediador. Como profesores de idiomas debemos reflexionar acerca de las maneras    como podr&iacute;amos mejorar y enriquecer la experiencia que le estamos ofreciendo    a nuestros estudiantes para que ellos se sientan y se hagan inteligentes tanto    cognitiva como emocionalmente. </p>     <p><b>Palabras claves</b>: Mediaci&oacute;n, mediador, desarrollo cognitivo, desarrollo    socio-emocional, intencionalidad, reciprocidad, trascendencia, significado,    competencia, complejidad, conducta compartida, individualidad, diferencia psicol&oacute;gica,    pertenencia, disposici&oacute;n   </p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>  <hr size="1">     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">INTRODUCTION</font></b></p>     <p>   From the time a child is born, his learning processes are guided and shaped    through the intervention of adults who are significant in the newborn&#8217;s    life. These important people in the child&#8217;s development are known as mediators.    They are the people who select, organise and present stimuli they consider most    appropriate for the child. They also decide on the most convenient ways to use    them in the cognitive, social and emotional development of the infant. Moreover,    these mediators, at the beginning parents, but later educators, take part in    the first attempts children make to respond to a stimulus. They lead and motivate    the corresponding answers while explaining why one answer is more useful and    effective than others. In this way, it is evident how the interaction among    these meaningful adults and the child allows the latter to shape his world progressively    and comprehend his place within it and its wide variety of contexts.</p>     <p>   At first, the infant has direct interaction with just his parents, siblings    and relatives, but later his context is widened and enriched in the educational    environment, the community and neighbourhood, peers and friends, the media and    culture. It is here where the child starts establishing connections between    his family experiences and those he is already acquiring at school and some    other contexts that allow him to continue adding more elements to his life and    knowledge, from birth to maturity. <a href="#f1">(See Figure 1)</a></p>         ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="f1"><img src="img/revistas/prf/n6/n6a16f1.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>   It is undeniable the impact these family and scholastic experiences have on    the kids&#8217; attitudes, and, consequently, on the achievement of their short    and long-term learning goals. That is why it is so important that the experiences    offered in one field or the other be the most meaningful, positive and formative.</p>     <p>   Regarding this, Reuven Feuerstein (1986), proposes a mediation process, in which    teachers, more than going beyond the transfer of knowledge, set up an action    plan to encourage pupils learn to learn. In order to do so, it is essential    that pupils learn to think by solving problems and doing research, gain knowledge    by using strategies that permit them to learn using well-defined purposesby    them and for them, know their cognitive styles and develop all the potential    they have for increasingly complex and abstraction levels of knowledge, have    the leading role in their own personal and academic growth and, lastly, to be    more effective, independent and critical people. </p>     <p>   In connection with Feuerstein&#8217;s characterisation of mediation, Williams    and Burden (1997) state that &#8220;mediation is to find ways of helping the    other to learn. Particularly, this involves helping learners to move through    the next layer of knowledge or understanding&#8221;. </p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">MEDIATION CRITERIA AND THE MEDIATOR&#8217;S IMPLICATIONS</font></b></p>     <p>   Before going specifically into the issue of mediation criteria, I wish first    to state that the purpose here is not to draw &#8220;an ideal teacher profile&#8221;,    but to consider some aspects which would help us qualify our teaching practice.    Martinez (1991), Prieto (1992), and Williams &amp; Burden (1997) discuss Feuerstein&#8217;s    mediation criteria which are fundamental to carry out any teaching-learning    activity. Integrating the criteria proposed by these authors, in <a href="#d1">Diagram    1</a>, I present the twelve main actions of mediation a mediator is recognised    for. It means that by taking all these elements into practice, mediators would    dare to say that their teaching is as effective and efficient as their pupils&#8217;    learning is.</p>         <p>    <center><a name="d1"><img src="img/revistas/prf/n6/n6a16d1.gif"></a></center></p> 	     <p><b>Intentionality and Reciprocity</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   This first criterion has to do with establishing the mediation experience purposes    within the teaching-learning process. The mediator shares his intentions with    the learner to involve him in a mutual process of enrichment and development.    At the same time, it is vital to ensure and verify that our students have understood    what is required and what is expected of them, and that both parts are capable    and well-disposed to achieve the intended goals. </p>     <p><b>Transcendence</b></p>     <p>   Objectives and goals, apart from being clear, reachable and meaningful, should    guarantee that the mediator is confronting his learners with learning experiences    and proposed academic tasks that are not only useful to carry out, but to confront    efficiently a wide variety of real and authentic situations in any other context.    The fact is that the pupils should learn, internalise and use something of a    more general value than what is being taught by the task, the project or the    class.</p>     <p><b>Significance</b></p>     <p>   Learning situations need to be presented in an organised, sequenced, interesting    and relevant way, encouraging learners&#8217; active and emotional involvement    in the processes. Therefore, the mediator has to explain the intention of the    activities in order to give them sense. He/she should discuss the importance    tasks have, and look for mechanisms that raise interest in the task itself.</p>     <p><b>Searching, Planning and Achieving Objectives</b></p>     <p>   This criterion implies guiding pupils to achieve their individual and group    goals in the short, medium or long term by setting real work plans. To make    this process easier, the mediator helps children to set their objectives and    the way they will approach them with perseverance, patience and hard work. At    the same time, it is the mediator&#8217;s duty to keep pupils&#8217; attention    focused on the stated teaching-learning goals.</p>     <p><b>Sense of Competence</b></p>     <p>   This mediation characteristic is related to the effectiveness and efficacy an    educational process should have when learners feel competent and capable of    learning. It is the mediator&#8217;s responsibility to create an environment    where learners can develop a positive self-image, high self-esteem and self-confidence.    We need to motivate in our pupils the feeling of &#8220;I can&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;m    capable of doing this...&#8221; We facilitate the acquisition of competencies    through adapting learning according to our pupils&#8217; interests and ages,    selecting the right material, presenting and sequencing the information and    providing relevant teaching-learning strategies that allow the development and    reinforcement of the students&#8217; capabilities. It is necessary to say that    it is not enough for our pupils to feel competent, they have to become competent    by acquiring the necessary abilities and strategies to take control of their    own learning process.</p>     <p><b>Awareness of Change</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   Modification implies that through the experience of mediation, learners should    be conscious that they can change, improve and strengthen not only their cognitive    functions but also their behaviours and strategies in order to achieve their    objectives. In this way, the mediator is s/he who encourages pupils to have    an objective knowledge of themselves and their learning processes. At the beginning,    it is the mediator who guides, controls and evaluates the way pupils internalise    information, but students must gradually transform themselves into active, dynamic    and autonomous individuals, able to generate self-evaluation mechanisms that    will allow them to take the initiative to direct their own learning processes.</p>     <p><b>Novelty and Complexity</b></p>     <p>   This is characteristic of mediation to promote intellectual curiosity, originality,    innovation and creativity or divergent thought. The mediator encourages challenge    and hard work through the selection and assignment of activities that are sufficiently    difficult to provide a challenge, but are achievable. Apart from that, the mediator    should propose a wide range of interactions and confrontations of diverse points    of view that invite his/her children to participate actively. The mediator might    use methodological, didactic and pedagogic strategies that form students willing    to learn.</p>     <p><b>Active Participation and Shared Conduct</b></p>     <p>   Sharing and working in a co-operative way are part of our social existence;    that is why we are encouraged to share not only behaviours and attitudes but    also knowledge. The educator-mediator promotes collaborative work, self-confidence,    and active participation among pupils in order to make them socialise, negotiate,    agree, respect differences and achieve working in harmony. The teacher must    be part of the group in order to increase the opportunities of reflective discussions    and to tighten the empathetic relationships necessary to increase motivation.    All this contributes to the learners&#8217; cognitive and socio-emotional growth.    When learners develop their abilities in the acquisition and development of    concepts and cognitive operations, they also learn social strategies for the    development of competencies that permit them to establish, co-ordinate and cultivate    good personal and work relationships. </p>     <p><b>Regulation and Control of Conduct</b></p>     <p>   The mediation experience provides alternatives that allow pupils to consider    possibilities before making any decision. It means that through appropriate    mediation, children also learn to have logical and systematic processes to solve    problems by making use of previously acquired knowledge, by using it with form    and coherence, and by expressing it through reasoning procedures. The mediator&#8217;s    contribution is to provide pupils with all the necessary tools for them to take    control of their own learning and behaviour in such a way that, besides being    &#8220;effective learners&#8221;, they also become more independent to decide    what to do, how, when and why. </p>     <p><b>Individuality and Psychological Difference</b></p>     <p>   Mediation is based on learning models that are based on individual differences,    cognitive functions and styles, which characterise pupils according to their    age and developmental stage. The mediator accepts, helps and motivates his children    as unique beings with independent and divergent thought processes with regard    to other pupils and even the teacher. At the same time kids learn to co-operate,    their individuality may emerge and it should be accepted and supported as they    need to assert the fact that they think and feel differently from others.</p>     <p><b>Sense of Belonging</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   While pupils feel unique and different, they also need to feel they are a recognised    part of a work team, a group, an educational institution, a society, and a culture.    What the mediator can do at this point is to promote team work (more than group    work) with specific and meaningful purposes for the students; to propose activities    in which they interchange and reinforce not only academic knowledge but also    social and cultural knowledge. In order to achieve these goals, it is, first    of all, necessary that the teaching-learning process occur in a positive climate    created by reciprocal support, tolerance, respect, confidence, empathy and productive    work. The atmosphere in which a learning process takes place and the nature    of the personal and group interactions through which it is carried out, have    a powerful influence on what, how and why a child learns.</p>     <p><b>Optimistic Awareness</b></p>     <p>   Although the learning process starts with the conviction that any individual    is able to become a highly effective learner regardless of his age and possible    difficulties, we are always raising artificial barriers in the way of the learning    processes. We always tend to make it more difficult than it really is. The mediation    experience espouses that is not important how difficult an activity or task    seems to be to some pupils, all of them are capable of doing it. Williams &amp;    Burden (1997) state the importance of encouraging a strong belief in learners    that there is always a solution to any problem so that they learn to be persistent    rather than giving up. As long as the educator believes that his pupils are    capable of accomplishing any task, he will continue to seek effective and efficient    ways and actions of helping them to achieve the learning goals.</p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">MEDIATION THROUGH THE EYES OF THE TEACHING-LEARNING PRACTICE</font></b></p>     <p>   At this point, it is necessary to state that teachers do not need to consider    how to include the twelve aspects of mediation in each proposed activity. They    have to contemplate the particular characteristics of their pupils to decide    which areas of mediation to involve. The following two examples of mediation    applied to language teaching activities are not intended to give a teaching    formula but to illustrate some of the different ways in which educators might    mediate. </p>     <p>Activity 1 <a href="#f2">(see Figure 2)</a> is a role-play for groups of four students. It is    based on talking about a recent holiday. Each pupil in the group is given a    handout (figure 2); they have seven minutes to read and to work out where he/she    went on holiday. Before starting, chairs are arranged to resemble a train compartment,    with pairs of students facing each other.</p>         <p>    <center><a name="f2"><img src="img/revistas/prf/n6/n6a16f2.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>Intentionality and Reciprocity</p>     <p>   The teacher explains the purpose of the activity in order to help learners to    see the value at a learning level. So, the mediator tells pupils that the intention    of this simulation is to reinforce and internalise past tenses, to talk as fluently    and accurately as possible without writing a word but practising the mental    organisation of the ideas. At the same time, the mediator checks if the instructions    are clear enough to start.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Transcendence</p>     <p>   The activity itself makes pupils use English in a different setting. They will    feel they are speaking for different purposes, not only to accomplish an academic    task. Although it is a semi-controlled activity, pupils might feel free to talk    about the different given items and come up with their own ideas.</p>     <p>Sense of Competence</p>     <p>   Teachers present all their students the same material, the same information    and the same teaching strategies. In spite of that, it is quite rare to find    cognitive homogeneity in the learning groups. Not all pupils have the same knowledge    and level of understanding, but all of them can do what is proposed. Thus, the    mediator needs to deal with the situation by adapting and creating activities    according to her/his students&#8217; cognitive level. The mediator has to pre-teach    what is necessary to carry out this activity and guide, support his/her pupils    (mostly those with learning difficulties). Through this exercise, teachers can    benefit their teaching-learning practise by paying attention to the co-operation    of &#8220;more advanced&#8221; peers in the group.</p>     <p>Novelty and Complexity</p>     <p>   This activity provides certain guidelines the pupil needs to consider in order    to use specific knowledge in terms of verb tenses and vocabulary, but they do    not limit students&#8217; oral production. Through this activity, the mediator    is encouraging a wide range of interactions and confrontations that invite pupils    to be creative and inventive.</p>     <p>Active Participation and Shared Conduct</p>     <p>   Group work activities are one of the most effective strategies mediators have    to develop and encourage a sense of self-confidence, co-operation and participation    in their pupils. Through an activity like this, students are not only socialising    but negotiating, sharing knowledge, attitudes, and are learning to respect what    the others say. They are guided to talk but to let their classmates talk too.    Mediators need to control the activity by guiding pupils (directly or indirectly)    to listen attentively, to take turns, to avoid aggressive or disrespectful attitudes.</p>     <p>Regulation and Control of Conduct</p>     <p>   This criterion is closely related to the previous one; the success of the activity    depends on the self-control pupils have. Mediators might help by discouraging    impulsive behaviour in their students. Thus, it is important that mediators    provide time and strategies to approach this activity in an organised way. It    means that students must have time to understand the activity and its purpose,    to organise their ideas before starting the activity, to organise information    in a logical and coherent way and to choose the best moment to start.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   Activity 2 <a href="#f3">(see Figure 3)</a> is a guessing activity whose function is to describe    objects. It is to be done individually. The teacher cuts up pictures so that    there is a different one for each student in the class (see some examples given    in Figure 3, but if the mediator prefers, he/she can make his/her own collection,    using magazine pictures). The teacher gives the pictures out, and tells students    not to show their picture to any one else. They should write a descriptive paragraph    about the object in the picture (without naming it). They should use have got,    looks like, adjectives for physical description (colour, texture, shape, size,    breadth, length, weight, materials, pattern, etc), in the present simple. When    they have finished, the mediator collects the descriptions, pins them up around    the classroom and asks students to walk around, reading the descriptions and    making a list of (at least) ten described objects.</p>         <p>    <center><a name="f3"><img src="img/revistas/prf/n6/n6a16f3.gif"></a></center></p>     <p>Significance</p>     <p>   Mediators need to be careful to choose the activities for their pupils. They    should not only be meaningful for the mediators&#8217; teaching purposes but    for the learners&#8217; motivation and interests. In this activity, the mediator    might choose objects that mean something to their pupils (for instance, part    of their surroundings and things that may touch their feelings). Additionally,    teachers need to organise the activity from the beginning to the end. To do    that, they should consider the number of pupils in the class, the objects to    be described, what to include in the description in terms of grammar items and    functions, the length of time pupils need to write the paragraph, the time pupils    need to read some descriptions in order to make their lists, and the time teachers    need to check the answers.</p>     <p>Searching, Planning and Achieving Objectives</p>     <p>   As this criterion implies guiding students to achieve their individual and group    goals (In the given activity, the individual goal is to write a descriptive    paragraph. The group aim is to provide information that allows others to make    their lists.), mediators have to provide all the information and strategies    for them to do so by pre-teaching vocabulary and guiding pupils in how to write    descriptive paragraphs. It is easier for pupils to plan how to accomplish the    objectives if they have all the elements (or at least most of them) required    for carrying out the activity beforehand.</p>     <p>Awareness of Change </p>     <p>   The teaching-learning process makes evident the weaknesses and strengths our    pupils have. It is the mediator&#8217;s duty to let them know about their potentials    as well as their difficulties, and to encourage them to reflect on the way they    are learning in order to improve their processes. Through this activity mediators    have the opportunity to see how their pupils are &#8220;tackling the activity&#8221;;    how they are using the vocabulary; how they are organising sentences and ideas;    how they are using punctuation; and how they are reading and understanding their    classmates&#8217; texts. It is a chance pupils have to become aware of their    reading and writing processes and strategies, and to establish an action plan    for changing or improving what they are doing wrong by practicing self-evaluation.</p>     <p>Individuality and Psychological Difference</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>   It is an individual activity and it may reflect a particular style, way of thinking    and feeling. All the pupils know the objectives of the activity and everyone    will accomplish them by using different learning strategies and mental operations.    Mediators have to accept and encourage their pupils&#8217; individuality and    let them express their thoughts and feelings freely. Teachers need to make it    clear to the students that they have a right to their own uniqueness.</p>     <p>Sense of Belonging</p>     <p>   Although the proposed activity implies an individual task at the beginning,    later it is promoting the interchange of ideas, thoughts and feelings among    the group. This activity implies that every piece of information given by each    member in the group is important and necessary to bring the activity to its    end. Mediators promote the active participation of their pupils in an atmosphere    of respect, tolerance, reciprocal support and confidence. </p>     <p>Optimistic Awareness</p>     <p>   During the activity, mediators are encouraging the strong belief in their students    that they can do what they need to, that the objectives of the activity are    achievable. Furthermore, students might feel especially optimistic when they    know they have all the capabilities and skills to participate effectively and    efficiently. Mediators could facilitate the performance of the activity by giving    one or two examples of paragraphs describing objects. In this way, pupils may    realise that it is not as difficult as it seems to be. </p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">CONCLUSION</font></b></p>     <p>   Given the necessary and sufficient conditions (criteria) to carry out a mediation    process, it seems to be the characterisation of what is and has been a good    teacher&#8217;s work. Furthermore, it is the mediator who is and should be the    main stimulus that propels his learners towards learning, being whole people    and knowing how to exist side by side with others. It is the teacher who is    in charge of giving validity to the mediation experience purpose that is none    other than to provide the learners with a wide range of stimuli, strategies    and processes that lead them towards the development of intelligent behaviour,    which is a prerequisite for effective cognitive functioning. As language teachers    we can enrich and qualify our teaching process by facilitating the learning    processes of our pupils with all the tools and strategies provided by the mediation. </p>     <p><b><font face="verdana" size="3">ABOUT THE AUTHOR</font></b></p>     <p>   <b>Fanny Stella Torres</b> studied Philology and Languages at the Universidad    Nacional de Colombia. Then, she got her specialization in Applied Linguistics    to the Teaching of English. She also received her AS/A diploma in English Language    and Literature in England. Her professional life has been developing in the    teaching field at the Universidad Nacional, where she has worked in the Extension    Programme for seven years, but also in the field of training and guiding pedagogic,    methodological and didactic trends at Gimnasio Los Andes School.</p>     <p>   <b><font face="verdana" size="3">REFERENCES</font></b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>   Feuerstein, R. (1986). Mediated learning experience. Jerusalem: Hadassan-Wizo-Canadian    Research Institute.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000093&pid=S1657-0790200500010001600001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Mart&iacute;nez, J. et al. (1991). Metodolog&iacute;a de la mediaci&oacute;n    en el P.E.I. Madrid: Editorial Bru&ntilde;o.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000094&pid=S1657-0790200500010001600002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Prieto, M. (1992). Modificabilidad cognitiva y P.E.I. Madrid: Editorial Bru&ntilde;o.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000095&pid=S1657-0790200500010001600003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Watcyn-Jones, P. (2000). Group work intermediate. London: Pearson Education    Limited.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000096&pid=S1657-0790200500010001600004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>   Williams, M. &amp; Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social    constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000097&pid=S1657-0790200500010001600005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>&nbsp; </p>     <p>&nbsp; </p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feuerstein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mediated learning experience]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Jerusalem ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hadassan-Wizo-Canadian Research Institute]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Metodología de la mediación en el P.E.I]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Bruño]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prieto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Modificabilidad cognitiva y P.E.I]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Bruño]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Watcyn-Jones]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Group work intermediate]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pearson Education Limited]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
