<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1657-4702</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[rev.latinoam.bioet.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1657-4702</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Militar Nueva Granada]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1657-47022021000100011</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18359/rlbi.4758</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Considerações jurídicas, éticas e médico-legais sobre a reprodução post mortem em alguns países da Ibero-América: revisão integrativa]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Legal, Ethical and Medical Considerations about Post-mortem Reproduction in some Countries of Ibero-America: Integrative Review]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Consideraciones jurídicas, éticas y medicolegales acerca de la reproducción post mortem en algunos países de la Iberoamérica: revisión integrativa]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guzmán Lozano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jorge Armando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takitane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juliana]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brasil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brasil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>30</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1657-47022021000100011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1657-47022021000100011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1657-47022021000100011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo: A aplicação das técnicas de reprodução humana assistida após a morte de um dos genitores é uma realidade que vai ganhando relevância e apoio entre juízes e doutrinários, mas que ainda encontra uma ampia rejeição social, principalmente em face dos sérios conflitos moráis, éticos e religiosos. Vários países da região vêm discutindo a adaptação de suas leis diante do crescimento da casuística. Neste estudo, é realizada uma análise comparativa da esfera jurídica, ética e médico-legal dos países ibero-americanos, por meio de uma revisão integrativa. Foram recuperados 21 estudos primários que abordam a situação normativa da Argentina, do Brasil, da Colômbia , da Espanha, do Peru, de Portugal e do Uruguai. Do conjunto, unicamente o Uruguai e a Espanha têm normatização permissiva para a reprodução post mortem. O primeiro de forma expressa e o último de forma implícita. A legislação de Portugal é proibitiva para a maioria das técnicas, à exceção da transferência pòstuma de embriões. A Argentina, a Colômbia e o Peru estão desregulamentados. O Brasil encontra-se numa situação especial, pois, embora inexista regulamentação específica, debate-se o caráter vinculante de algumas normativas. Ainda, é discutido o papel da medicina legal ante os novos desafios bioéticos e biojurídicos, em termos práticos e teóricos, propondo uma participação no debate que antecede toda possível autorização.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: The application of assisted human reproduction techniques after the death of one of the genitors is a reality that has gained relevance and support among judges and doctrinaires, although it still finds a wide social rejection, mainly in the face of serious moral, ethical and religious conflicts. Several countries in the region have discussed adapting their laws to the growth of casuistry. In the study, a comparative analysis of the legal, ethical and medical sphere of ibero-American countries is carried out through an integrative review. 21 primary studies were obtained addressing the regulatory situation in Argentina, Brazil, Colômbia , Spain, Peru, Portugal and Uruguay. From these countries, only Uruguay and Spain have permissive regulation for post-mortem reproduction. The first, expressly and the last implicitly. Portugal's legislation is prohibitive for most techniques, with the exception of the posthumous transfer of embryos. Argentina, Colômbia and Peru are not regulated. Brazil is in a special situation, as, there is no specific regulation, the binding nature of some regulations is discussed. Finally, the role of legal medicine has been discussed in the face of new bioethical and biolegal challenges, in practical and theoretical terms, posing participation in the debate that precedes any possible authorization.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: La aplicación de las técnicas de reproducción humana asistida tras la muerte de uno de los genitores es una realidad que ha cobrado relevancia y apoyo entre jueces y doctrinarios, pero que aún encuentra amplio rechazo social, principalmente en cara a los serios conflictos morales, éticos y religiosos. Varios países de la región han discutido la adaptación de sus leyes ante el crecimiento de la casuística. En el estudio, se realiza un análisis comparativo de la esfera jurídica, ética y medicolegal de los países iberoamericanos, por medio de una revisión integrativa. Se rescataron 21 estudios primarios que abordan la situación normativa de Argentina, Brasil, Colombia , España, Perú, Portugal y Uruguay. De estos, únicamente Uruguay y España tienen regulación permisiva para la reproducción post mortem. El primero de forma expresa y el último de forma implícita. La legislación de Portugal es prohibitiva para la mayoría de las técnicas, a excepción de la transferencia póstuma de embriones. Argentina, Colombina y Perú están desregularizados. Brasil se encuentra en una situación especial, pues, aunque inexista regulación específica, se debate el carácter vinculante de algunas normativas. Por último, se ha discutido el rol de la medicina legal ante los nuevos desafíos bioéticos y biojurídicos, en términos prácticos y teóricos, planteando una participación en el debate que antecede toda posible autorización.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[reprodução póstuma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[legislação e jurisprudência]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[bioética]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[América Latina]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Espanha]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Portugal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[posthumous reproduction]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[legislation and jurisprudence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[bioethics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Latin America]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Spain]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Portugal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reproducción póstuma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[legislación y jurisprudencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[bioética]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[América Latina]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[España]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Portugal]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aziza-Shuster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ethics and society: A child at all costs: Posthumous reproduction and the meaning of parenthood]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod [internet]]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>2182-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sabatello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Posthumously conceived children: An international and human rights perspective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JL &amp; Health [internet]]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shefi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raviv]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eisenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Posthumous sperm retrieval: Analysis of time interval to harvest sperm]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod [internet]]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>2890-3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurwitz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Batzer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A guest editorial: Posthumous sperm procurement: Demand and concerns]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol Surv [internet]]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>806-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blyth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cameron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The welfare of the child. An emerging issue in the regulation of assisted conception]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod [internet]]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>2339-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tremellen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Savulescu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A discussion supporting presumed consent for posthumous sperm procurement and conception Reprod Biomed Online [internet]]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>6-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carbajal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Autorizaron la extracción de semen de un hombre fallecido: Para que haya vida tras la muerte. Página 12 [internet]]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rezzieri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direitos hereditários do concebido post mortem no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro: uma análise crítica a partir do sopesamento entre princípios sucessórios e constitucionais [monografia]]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>142</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nogueira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O regime jurídico da procriação medicamente assistida Post mortem e as suas implicações no direito sucessório português [Dissertação de Mestrado]]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>145</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Braga ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidade do Minho]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Orr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siegler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is posthumous semen retrieval ethically permissible?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Med Ethics [internet]]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>299-302</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guzmán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Aspectos bioéticos y jurídicos del manejo del cadáver: un análisis de su estatus mortem y su consonancia ética en la praxis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Vida y Ética [internet]]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>77-141</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ganong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Integrative reviews of nursing research]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Res Nurs Health [internet]]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Enguer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dilemas bioéticos y jurídicos de la reproducción asistida en la sociedad actual en España]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. latinoam. bioét. [internet]]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>104-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reprodução Assistida Post mortem no Direito Brasileiro]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Biodireito e D reito dos Animais [internet]]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>36-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Un debate complejo: la técnica de reproducción humana asistida post mortem desde la perspectiva comparada]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. ius [internet]]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>39</numero>
<issue>39</issue>
<page-range>185-206</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Análise crítica sobre a evolução das normas éticas para a utilizado das técnicas de reprodução assistida no Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ciénc. Saúde Colet. [internet]]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>917-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Panorama bioético e jurídico da reprodução humana assistida no Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. bioét. derecho [internet]]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>64-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consentimiento presunto a las técnicas de reproducción humana asistida post mortem. Criterios para su regulación en Argentina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. bioét. derecho [Internet]]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<page-range>149-65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Guitián]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La reproducción artificial post mortem en España: estudio ante un nuevo dilema jurídico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Bol. Der. [internet]]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<page-range>292-322</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reproducción asistida y filiación. Tres casos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Opin. jurid. [internet]]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>24</numero>
<issue>24</issue>
<page-range>135-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Varsi Rospigliosi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Determinación de la filiación en la procreación asistida]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. IUS [internet]]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>39</numero>
<issue>39</issue>
<page-range>109-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dantas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raposo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legal aspects of post-mortem reproduction: A comparative perspective of French, Brazilian and Portuguese legal systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Law [internet]]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>181-98</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abreu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Estudo das regulamentações de reprodução humana assistida no Brasil, Chile, Uruguai e na Argentina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Reprod Clim [internet]]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>27-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krasnow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AN]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La filiación por técnicas de reproducción humana asistida en el Código Civil y Comercial argentino. Un avance que permite armonizar la norma con la realidad]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Derecho Privado [internet]]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>175-217</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pisetta Cecchini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inseminación artificial y fecundación in vitro homólogas post mortem: la filiación y la sucesión según la ley brasileña]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Foro [internet]]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>355-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reprodução medicamente assistida: questões bioéticas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. bioét [internet]]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>66-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez Ruiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martinez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernandez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fecundación in vitro postmortem]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cultura de los cuidados [internet]]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>171-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Extracción de semen post mortem: aspectos éticos y legales. Descripción de caso y estudio en Colômbia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. colomb. bioét. [internet]]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>170-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moadie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OV]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reflexión crítica sobre la fecundación post-mortem como TRA en el ordenamiento jurídico Colômbia no y su incidencia en el ámbito filial y sucesoral]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta académica [internet]]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>1-18</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gomez Recuero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ley de Reproducción Humana Asistida y Capacidad para adquirir en materia sucesoria]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La justicia uruguaya: revista jurídica [internet]]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>150</volume>
<page-range>1-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morante]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Debería permitir la futura ley peruana sobre técnicas de reproducción humana asistida (Teras) la figura del Embarazo Post mortem?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Vox Juris [internet]]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>161-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reflexiones acerca del documento indubitado en la fecundación post mortem]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Actual. juríd. iberoam. [internet]]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>454-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Senna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O estabelecimento da filiação na lei de procriação medicamente assistida portuguesa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev. Eletrónica de Direito [internet]]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>70-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Argentina</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Proyecto de Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Infojus]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Argentina</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ley 26.994/2014. Código Civil y Comercial de 07/10/2014]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Infoleg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Argentina</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Proyecto de ley: Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida - Expediente 4058- D-2014 de 27/05/2014. Cámara de Diputados]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Brasil</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Resoluto do CMF n° 2.168/2017]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Conselho Federal de Medicina. Diário Oficial da União de 10 de novembro de 2017]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Brasil</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lei no 10.406/2002. Código Civil de 10/01/2002]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diário Oficial da União de 11 de janeiro de 2002]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Colômbia</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Proyecto de Ley 151/2001. Modificación del Código Civil y Penal referente a la aplicación de los métodos de procreación humana asistida]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gaceta del Congreso]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Colômbia</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ley 57/1887. Código Civil Colômbia no]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Congreso de la República de Colômbia]]></source>
<year>1887</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Espanha</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ley 14/2006. Sobre técnicas de reprodução humana assistida de 26/05/2006]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Boletín Oficial del Estado de 27 de mayo de 2006]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Espanha</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Constitución Española de 31/10/1978]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Boletín Oficial del Estado de 29 de diciembre de 1978]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Peru</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Anteproyecto de Reforma del Código Civil Peruano. Grupo de Trabajo Revisión y Mejoras Código Civil Peruano de 1984]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La Ley; 2019]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Peru</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Decreto Legislativo n° 295. Código Civil del Perú de 24/06/1984]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Congreso de la República]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Portugal</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lei 32/2006. Regula as Técnicas de reprodução medicamente assistida de 26/07/2006]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diàrio da República de 26 de julho de 2006]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Uruguai</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ley n° 19.167 sobre Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida de 22/11/2013]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diario Oficial de 29 de noviembre de 2013]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Uruguai</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ley n° 16.603 Código Civil de 19/10/1994]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diario Oficial de 21 de noviembre de 1994]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dostal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Post-mortem sperm retrieval in new European Union countries: Case report]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod [internet]]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>2359-61</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Batzer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurwitz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caplan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Postmortem parenthood and the need for a protocol with posthumous sperm procurement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>79</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1263-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bahadur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Death and conception]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod [internet]]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>2769-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stoker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Landry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The ethics of a postmortem testicular harvest]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Emerg Med [Internet]]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>178-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Policy on posthumous sperm retrieval: Survey of 75 Major Academic Medical Centers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology [internet]]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>113</volume>
<page-range>45-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53.</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pajot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz Sastre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mullet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mapping French people's views regarding posthumous reproduction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Reprod Infant Psychol [internet]]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>524-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
