Osteoporosis in childhood: related factors and prevention

Emilio González-Jiménez, MD¹, Judit Álvarez-Ferre, Enf²

1. Professor, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Granada. Granada, España. e-mail: emigoji@ugr.es
2. Nurse, University Hospital San Rafael, Granada, España. e-mail: jualfe82@gmail.com

Received for publication February 2, 2010                                         Accepted for publication May 25, 2010

SUMMARY

Osteoporosis is defined as a reduction in bone mass. This loss is more important in states of malnutrition, physical inactivity, and with a poor dietary intake of vitamin D and calcium. Bone mineralization depends on both genetic and nutritional factors, as well as endocrine, metabolic, and mechanical factors. Several studies in children have shown that the development of osteoporosis in adulthood may be influenced by the nutritional status during childhood, especially with regard to the contributions of calcium and vitamin D. However, currently there are many questions regarding its pathogenesis and diagnosis and its treatment, some of which are reviewed in this paper. The aim of this work has been to provide an update on the main factors associated with the development of osteoporosis and its prevention in infancy.

Keywords: Osteoporosis; Childhood; Related factors; Prevention.

Colomb Med. 2011; 42: 111-6

RESUMEN

La osteoporosis se define como una reducción de la masa ósea. Diversos estudios en niños han demostrado que el desarrollo de osteoporosis en la etapa adulta puede verse condicionado por el estado nutricional durante la infancia, sobre todo en lo referente a los aportes de calcio y vitamina D. No obstante, en la actualidad existen numerosos interrogantes en lo referente a los procesos fisiológicos implicados en su desarrollo precoz en el niño. El objetivo de este trabajo ha sido analizar los principales factores implicados en el desarrollo de la osteoporosis y su prevención en la etapa infantil. Para ello, se realizó una revisión sistemática que incluye un total de 46 artículos publicados en los últimos trece años en Medline. Los estudios analizados coinciden porque consideran que la osteoporosis en el niño representa una manifestación o, mejor, la consecuencia de una situación patológica de base, que condiciona su aparición y desarrollo. Su prevención debe ser considerada en un marco más amplio de estrategias de prevención.

Palabras clave: Osteoporosis; Infancia; Factores de riesgo; Prevención.

Colomb Med. 2011; 42: 111-6

Given the increase in longevity achieved at present, the population has determined a striking increase in the prevalence of certain diseases and, in other cases, the emergence of new forms of illness and during different life stages.

Currently, osteoporosis has become a public health problem predominantly affecting the elderly, demanding an important section of the total health expenditure. On the other hand, it is an important factor in reducing the quality of life of these individuals, preferably by increased risks of fractures^1,2.

Bone mass and assessment of their status. Bone mass means the total amount of bone tissue in the organism including the ossified extracellular matrix². At present, it is accepted that the acquisition of appropriate peak bone mass is essential to prevent osteoporosis later in life. Since this formation and accumulation of bone mass occurs during the first decades of life, control of bone mineralization during childhood is a significant aspect to assess interest (Graphic 1). This monitoring should aim at identifying children at risk of developing osteopenia. Also, in the general population, measures should be implemented to prevent the onset of the disease by promoting lifestyles and ways of increasing bone mass³.

Achieving an adequate level of bone mass is partly dependent on nutritional factors; therefore, it is necessary to maintain adequate nutrient supplies during the growing stage. Another aspect to consider is genetic factors, accounting for 60% of the total factors. In adulthood, neo-bone formation decreases after a period in which bone mass remains stable⁴.

Diagnosis and even preventive and therapeutical evaluation of osteoporosis may be specially hindered in children because of the need to use techniques that, although sensitive, reproducible, and precise, must be quick, painless, safe and noninvasive.

Of all the methods proposed by the National Osteoporosis Foundation to assess bone quality, the most used technique is dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The basis of this technique in the attenuation study is subjected to a dual X-ray beam through bone tissue⁷. Although it can be done at different levels, the benchmarks for determining the criteria of normality, osteopenia, or osteoporosis refer to data obtained at the height of the femoral neck or lumbar vertebrae (L2-L4) of the reference population. The interpretation of this technique raises some difficulties in children⁸. There is already benchmarks^9-11, although obtained from cross-sectional studies.

The measurements are available in axial regions (hip, spine) or peripheral regions (calcaneus, tibia, knee, radius and phalanges), although it has been shown that measurements of the spinal column predict risk of fracture at that level, but not others, and the same occurs with the rest of the locations where bone mineral density (BMD) is measured. In children, the area for selection is further complicated because the timing and rate of mineralization depends on the biological age¹². Sufficiently vascularized bone, with good motility and under some pressure should be selected. In this regard, the determination in the calcaneus could induce excessive bias to withstand pressure, although it is preferred by some authors¹³.
Other recent application techniques are ultrasound imaging and computerized tomography. It is a noninvasive technique, excellently accepted at any age, which has been effective as bone assessment procedures in adults and children¹⁴. But the excessive costs of computerized tomography limit its use as a technique for the prevention of osteoporosis (Table 1).

Bone mineralization. Bone mineralization is a complex process regulated by genetic and hormonal factors, as well as by environmental and nutritional factors¹⁵. From a genetic standpoint, mineralization is controlled by a large group of genes. Among the most studied is the gene controlling vitamin D receptor, which depends on calcium absorption in the intestine.

At the hormonal level, there are several hormones involved in bone mineralization. These include parathyroid hormone, which balances the mechanisms of formation and resorption of bone while enhancing vitamin D action. Calcitonin, which inhibits the action of osteoclasts, and growth hormone, HGH and IGF-1, that acts in the formation of cartilage and promotes the synthesis of the active metabolite of vitamin D¹⁵.

Other molecules with activity on bone mass are the corticosteroids. They only act on bone mineralization when increased above normal levels, decreasing bone mass and bone growth. This is an important consideration in children treated with corticosteroids. Thyroid hormones, in turn, are also involved in decreased mineralization with increasing concentrations. But all of these factors may also act on the environmental factors that can intervene by modifying diet and lifestyle¹⁵.

Osteopenia and osteoporosis. Osteopenia is defined by decreased bone mineral density between -1 and -2.5 SD for age, sex, height, and pubertal stage. Cases where decreased bone mineral density is below 2 SD are considered osteoporosis¹⁶.

However, there are childhood diseases that may be present with osteopenia; thereby, increasing the risk of osteoporosis during adulthood. Many mechanisms could be cited for the production of osteopenia; although, these could be divided into three main groups. One group includes those processes occurring with an inadequate intake of nutrients such as anorexia nervosa, bulimia, protein-calorie malnutrition, or poorly controlled diets¹⁸. A second group would be composed of those disorders with intestinal malabsorption boxes. Within this section, as possible symptoms of osteopenia generators we could include celiac disease, cystic fibrosis, intolerance to cow milk proteins, and inflammatory bowel disease. Other processes potentially involved in the development of osteopenia include neuropathy and liver disease present with impaired synthesis of active vitamin D metabolites. Other processes involve the states of metabolic acidosis and prolonged administration of certain drugs such as anticonvulsants or corticosteroids¹⁹.

Nutritional factors. Proper nutrition is a key factor in maintaining adequate skeletal mineralization. In this process of bone mineralization, energy and nutrients intervene in various ways, either by encouraging the development of cell mitosis, participating as visual elements to become vitamin sources, which will involve regulating the synthesis of bone matrix and promoting the absorption level of intestinal calcium or contributing to the synthesis of various hormones and growth factors²⁰.

Through feeding, the body receives visual elements; vitamins intervene by regulating the synthesis of bone matrix and intestinal absorption of calcium and other minerals whose primary function is to act on the formation and consolidation of mineralized bone. Another essential aspect of bone remodeling in children will be energy intake. This is essential because decreased energy intake induces delays in growth, maturation, and bone mineralization²¹. Then, in children with malnutrition, by default, it is necessary to control the state of bone mineralization.

The bone mineralization process will necessarily be regulated by protein intake through the diet. In this sense, in children, situations of inadequate intake may induce the emergence of problems of mineralization. On the contrary, when its contribution in the diet is excessive it can cause hypercalciuria boxes; this is due to increased excretion of acid produced during protein catabolism. At present, it is possible that the protein diet consumed in most developed countries is closely linked to increased osteoporosis in the population²².

Another aspect to consider is the ratio of sodium ingested to calcium excreted by the kidney. Sodium and calcium share the same carrier at the proximal renal tubule. There is yet no need to adjust the contribution of calcium to sodium intake through the diet in children²³.

Physical exercise, for its part, plays an important role in bone remodeling, especially weight-bearing exercise, i.e., one that creates pressure on the skeleton. In this sense, running would be one of the physical activities that would increase bone mass development to a greater degree. Moreover, at present it is unknown whether the amount of calcium ingested in the diet may or may not alter the beneficial effect of exercise^24,25.

Calcium. Calcium is an essential pillar in the prevention of osteoporosis. In our body and especially in the bones, it is deposited as hydroxyapatite crystals. Its deposit varies throughout life from 30 grams at birth to about 1300 grams in adulthood²⁶. Given this, it will be necessary to modulate calcium intake during periods of increased growth and, especially during adolescence. Adolescence tends to accumulate 40% of the total bone mass produced throughout life. Several studies have shown that calcium supplementation during adolescence increases bone mineral density²⁶. Administering 500 ml of milk per day during childhood will ensure intake of about 400 mg of calcium, equivalent to 60% of the recommended daily amount.

Moreover, we have to take into account the bioavailability of calcium in food. The presence of phytates inhibits absorption and, therefore, vegetables, legumes, and cereals despite containing high levels of calcium are not as comparable as milk. Similarly, oxalates, alcohol, caffeine, and phosphates hinder calcium absorption even when present in the diet^27,28. Finally, obesity and overweight conditions in children have been associated with increased bone density; nevertheless, there is evidence linking these situations to a higher incidence of fractures²⁹.

Appropriate strategies to prevent osteoporosis from childhood. To prevent osteoporosis, it is necessarily to have an assessment of bone mineralization status from early infancy, particularly in subjects at risk. In this sense, preterm infants, patients with malabsorption syndromes, and corticosteroid therapy patients constitute the population at greatest risk of poor bone mineralization^30,31.

In children one to eight years of age, there is no explicit consensus on the specific requirements for calcium. In any case, we recommend an intake of 500 mg per day for one- to three-year olds³³. This figure should be increased as they age and approach puberty. Thus, for those four to eight years of age, the requirements will amount to 800 mg of calcium per day. But overt health benefits by increasing the daily amount have not been found³⁴. And at puberty, it is estimated that for every inch of growth, 20 g of calcium are required^34,35.

It is estimated that the highest positive balance is achieved with an average daily intake of 1300 mg. In contrast, those exposed to lower levels will have a negative impact on the bone mineralization process³⁶. This corresponds to measurements made on white teens³⁷.

Excess calcium in the diet, in turn, can cause a deficiency of iron and zinc, while favoring the formation of kidney stones²⁶. Similarly, phosphates present in carbonated drinks can also act by inhibiting the absorption of calcium in the intestine²⁶.

In cases of subjects with lactose intolerance, the simple addition of commercial lactase or ingestion of fermented dairy products like yogurt can remedy this situation³⁸.

Finally, toxic habits such as snuff or alcohol may also interfere with bone mineralization³⁹. But if there is a successful strategy to prevent osteoporosis from childhood, it is regular physical exercise^40,41. Physical exercise from an early age not only guarantees us an optimal weight status, but also formidable skeleton mineralization of our circumstances is of great importance when the subject population is children and teenagers^42-44.

REFERENCES